ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

23
Use of Personal Learning Environments by Security and Investigation Professionals Preparing for Presentation to the Personal Learning Environments Conference Berlin, July 11, 2013 A.E. (Tony) Ratcliffe University of Leicester

Upload: tony-ratcliffe

Post on 03-Jul-2015

44 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Use of Personal Learning

Environments by Security

and Investigation

Professionals

Preparing for Presentation to thePersonal Learning Environments Conference

Berlin, July 11, 2013

A.E. (Tony) RatcliffeUniversity of Leicester

Page 2: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Overview

• Getting it ready

• The content

Page 3: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Getting it Ready

• Acceptance process, full paper, 8K

• Template

• Shepherding and other review

• Presentation

• Publication

Page 4: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

The Content

Page 5: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Introduction

• Certification and ongoing learning after hiring

• Missed opportunities – collaboration, online tech

• Security management is one

• Network and collaborate f2f, some online

• Corporate security roles

Page 6: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Literature

• Informal, non-formal, and formal learning

• Personal learning environments and personal

learning networks

• Digital literacy skills

• Communities of practice and online affinity spaces

Page 7: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Research Question

• How are security management and investigation

professionals using personal learning

environments (PLEs) and digital literacies for

work-based learning and, in particular, continuing

professional development?

Page 8: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Research Design

• Exploratory, global

• Test instruments, but more to inform main study

• Qualitative description methodology, to provide a

“straight description of phenomena”

(Sandelowski, 2000)

• Reach large numbers followed by personal

interviews with small number

Page 9: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Sampling plan

• Non-probability, convenience, purposeful

• Requests posted in 13 discussion groups

• From 67 completed questionnaires, 11 interviews

Page 10: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Tools

• FluidSurveys

• Skype

• f5

• Dragon Dictate

• NVivo 9

Page 11: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Ethical Considerations

• University Research Ethics Code of Practice

• Association of Internet Researchers (guide)

• Other literature

• No issues of concern, posting for participants

• Moving forward, ethical issues to be addressed

later

Page 12: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Results

• 137 accessed questionnaire over 20 days

• 67 completed questionnaire

• 35 willing for interview

• 17 countries

• 91% male; 9% female (1 not specified)

• Under 35 - 1, 65 or older – 3, 35-64 - 62

• Canada (36%), UK (22%), USA (10%), Australia (7%)

Page 13: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Results

• 10 Skype or Skype to telephone interviews

• 1 email interview

• 21 to 78 minutes

• 6 guiding questions

Page 14: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Analysis

• 2 major themes

• Online activities

• Online challenges

Page 15: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Online activities

• From questionnaire

• Read group/discussion messages, 67%

frequent, 31% infrequent

• Respond to discussion messages, 96%, but 76%

infrequent

Page 16: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Other activities

Asked them about:

• Starting discussion topics

• Starting discussion topics by linking to an

article, story, etc.

• Writing blog posts

• Posting updates on Twitter, Facebook, or other social

media

• Gaming such as World of Warcraft

• Activities in a virtual world, such as Second Life

Page 17: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Response

• The highest participation by activity was

29%, providing regular updates on social media

Page 18: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Asked to identify other

activities

• Email

• Work related research

• Course work including research, online study portals, podcasts, course discussion boards

• Online training programmes for software and products

• Skype for overseas contacts

• Webinars, webcasts, and podcasts

• Virtual conferences

• YouTube for research including conferences and speakers

• Educational programming from Khan Academy and iTunesU

• News from local, national, and international sources

• Reading

• Restricted professional forums or sites

• Internet communities

• Language learning

Page 19: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Other Activities cont.

• Completing professional certifications

• Mentoring

• Solving client problems beyond own experience

• Sharing organisation knowledge with the public

• Maintaining currency in relation to industry trends

• Relationships with learners when teaching within online course platform

• Finding hard copy text books to order, preferring over e-books

Page 20: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

More Activities Identified in

Interviews

• Presentations from BrightTALK and TED Talks

• Global communication

• Making learning continuous, even after the course ends

• Accessing the opinions of many people, from different sides of an issue

• Course learning from anywhere

• Email distribution lists, as frequent as several times daily

• Using videos from YouTube when teaching subject area in which instructor does not have expertise

• Text alerts of major happenings before the news

Page 21: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Challenges with Online

Activities

• Current methods adequate, no need for online to

develop network, lack of need for information

feeds

• Concern with being accountable, ie to HR

• Security

• Privacy

• Authenticity

Page 22: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Conclusions

• Consumers more than contributors

• Concern with activity level to justify being

communities of practice

• Participatory culture missing

• Failed to identify those who ARE participating and

contributing

Page 23: Ratcliffe, research days, june 24, 2013

Future Research

• Main study for PhD

• Focus on identifying demonstrating collaboration

and sharing

• Seek examples of those using PLE as a Zone of

Proximal Development