rate dependent bundle branch block induced by hyperkalemia

2
Rate Dependent Bundle Branch Block Induced by Hyperkalemia NAVEEN MANOHAR and MING-LON YOUNG From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Florida Introduction An increase in serum potassium can be fol- lowed by severe and progressive cardiac electro- physiological derangement. In the surface elec- trocardiogram hyperkalemia is manifested with widening of the QRS due to the conduction de- lay in the specialized conduction system and the myocardium. This article describes an unique case of rate dependent bundle branch block caused by hyperkalemia. Case Report A.M. is a 14-day-old premature girl born at 29 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 730 g and good Apgar scores (1 minute, 8; 5 minutes, 9). Her blood urea nitrogen and creatinine started to increase at the 7 th day of life and remained fairly constant until day 14. Her electrolytes on day 13 showed a sodium of 132 meq/L, potassium of 4.2 meq/L, CO 2 of 23, urea nitrogen of 24 mg/dL, and creatinine of 1.3 mg/dL. She also developed episodes of apnea and bradycardia requiring intu- bation and ventilatory support on the 13 th day of life. On day 14 she developed a pnemothorax that prompted a chest tube insertion. Cardiac ar- rhythmias were noticed on the cardiac monitor. A rhythm strip (Fig. 1) showed sinus arrhyth- mia with varied P-P intervals (530–410 ms) and a relatively constant and prolonged P-R interval of 180 ms (because some P waves fell into the QRS-T complexes thus it was uncertain this was Mobitz type I atrioventricular block). Immediately follow- ing the ninth QRS-T complex after a long pause of 740 ms, the next cardiac cycle had a relatively narrow QRS (80 ms). This was followed by a rate dependent right bundle branch block; the R-R in- tervals decreased progressively from 740 to 380 ms with a gradual widening of the QRS complexes (80–150 ms). The arterial blood gas showed: pH 6.8, pCO 2 67, pO 2 75, HCO 3 12, and base excess - 22. The electrolytes drawn at this time showed: sodium 130 meq/L, potassium 8.8 meq/L, CO 2 11, urea nitrogen 72 mg/dL, and creatinine 2.7 mg/dL. Address for reprints: Ming Young, M.D., Department of Pedi- atrics, University of Miami, (R-76), P.O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. Fax: (305) 324-6012; e-mail: [email protected] Received January 14, 2003; revised March 21, 2003; accepted April 8, 2003. The baby was managed with kayexelate, NaHCO 3 , calcium, insulin, and glucose. The electrolyte abnormalities were corrected within 24 hours and her blood urea nitrogen and crea- tinine on day 20 were 28 mg/dL and 1.7 mg/dL. The cause for her sudden and profound metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, and renal failure has not been ascertained. After normalization of the electrolytes her electrocardiogram became un- remarkable. There was no recurrence of the rate dependent bundle branch block even when she had sinus tachycardia with a cardiac cycle length that was <400 ms. The baby was stable thereafter. Discussion The cardiac sensitivity to potassium is maxi- mal in the atrium and the ventricle and least in the specialized conduction system. There have been several reports of left- or right-axis deviation of the QRS, 1 bifascicular block, 2,3 and right bundle branch block that are normalized after treatment of hyperkalemia. 4 A rate dependent nature to these bocks have not seen described in hyperkalemia. Rate dependent bundle branch block occurs when the cycle length falls below the refractory pe- riod of the bundle branch. Normally, the refractory period of the bundle branch is shorter than the car- diac cycle length in a normal physiological range of heart rate. With a decrease in cycle length, the re- fractory period of the bundle branch normally de- creases. 5 Therefore, rate dependent bundle branch block might occur when there is an absence of this expected decrease in the refractory period of the bundle branch with the decrease in cardiac cycle length, or due to an absolute increase in the bun- dle branch refractory period, or a combination of the two. 6 In the present patient, below the cycle length of 440 ms there was a gradual progression into a complete bundle branch block manifested by a progressive widening of the QRS when the car- diac cycles were decreased further. The pause in the rhythm strip might be caused by an impair- ment of the sinus node impulse generation sec- ondary to hyperkalemia, or a subtle progressive lengthening of PR intervals followed by a blocked P wave that was buried inside the widened QRS-T complex (i.e., Mobitz type I atrioventricular con- duction block). This transient pause permitted the next atrial impulse conduct to the ventricle in a relatively normal pattern. PACE, Vol. 26 September 2003 1909

Upload: naveen-manohar

Post on 06-Jul-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rate Dependent Bundle Branch Block Induced by Hyperkalemia

Rate Dependent Bundle Branch Block Inducedby HyperkalemiaNAVEEN MANOHAR and MING-LON YOUNGFrom the Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Florida

IntroductionAn increase in serum potassium can be fol-

lowed by severe and progressive cardiac electro-physiological derangement. In the surface elec-trocardiogram hyperkalemia is manifested withwidening of the QRS due to the conduction de-lay in the specialized conduction system and themyocardium. This article describes an unique caseof rate dependent bundle branch block caused byhyperkalemia.

Case ReportA.M. is a 14-day-old premature girl born at

29 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 730 gand good Apgar scores (1 minute, 8; 5 minutes,9). Her blood urea nitrogen and creatinine startedto increase at the 7th day of life and remainedfairly constant until day 14. Her electrolytes on day13 showed a sodium of 132 meq/L, potassium of4.2 meq/L, CO2 of 23, urea nitrogen of 24 mg/dL,and creatinine of 1.3 mg/dL. She also developedepisodes of apnea and bradycardia requiring intu-bation and ventilatory support on the 13th day oflife.

On day 14 she developed a pnemothoraxthat prompted a chest tube insertion. Cardiac ar-rhythmias were noticed on the cardiac monitor.A rhythm strip (Fig. 1) showed sinus arrhyth-mia with varied P-P intervals (530–410 ms) anda relatively constant and prolonged P-R interval of180 ms (because some P waves fell into the QRS-Tcomplexes thus it was uncertain this was Mobitztype I atrioventricular block). Immediately follow-ing the ninth QRS-T complex after a long pauseof 740 ms, the next cardiac cycle had a relativelynarrow QRS (80 ms). This was followed by a ratedependent right bundle branch block; the R-R in-tervals decreased progressively from 740 to 380 mswith a gradual widening of the QRS complexes(80–150 ms). The arterial blood gas showed: pH6.8, pCO2 67, pO2 75, HCO3 12, and base excess- 22. The electrolytes drawn at this time showed:sodium 130 meq/L, potassium 8.8 meq/L, CO2 11,urea nitrogen 72 mg/dL, and creatinine 2.7 mg/dL.

Address for reprints: Ming Young, M.D., Department of Pedi-atrics, University of Miami, (R-76), P.O. Box 016960, Miami, FL33101. Fax: (305) 324-6012; e-mail: [email protected]

Received January 14, 2003; revised March 21, 2003; acceptedApril 8, 2003.

The baby was managed with kayexelate,NaHCO3, calcium, insulin, and glucose. Theelectrolyte abnormalities were corrected within24 hours and her blood urea nitrogen and crea-tinine on day 20 were 28 mg/dL and 1.7 mg/dL.The cause for her sudden and profound metabolicacidosis, hyperkalemia, and renal failure hasnot been ascertained. After normalization of theelectrolytes her electrocardiogram became un-remarkable. There was no recurrence of therate dependent bundle branch block even whenshe had sinus tachycardia with a cardiac cyclelength that was <400 ms. The baby was stablethereafter.

DiscussionThe cardiac sensitivity to potassium is maxi-

mal in the atrium and the ventricle and least in thespecialized conduction system. There have beenseveral reports of left- or right-axis deviation ofthe QRS,1 bifascicular block,2,3 and right bundlebranch block that are normalized after treatmentof hyperkalemia.4 A rate dependent nature to thesebocks have not seen described in hyperkalemia.

Rate dependent bundle branch block occurswhen the cycle length falls below the refractory pe-riod of the bundle branch. Normally, the refractoryperiod of the bundle branch is shorter than the car-diac cycle length in a normal physiological rangeof heart rate. With a decrease in cycle length, the re-fractory period of the bundle branch normally de-creases.5 Therefore, rate dependent bundle branchblock might occur when there is an absence of thisexpected decrease in the refractory period of thebundle branch with the decrease in cardiac cyclelength, or due to an absolute increase in the bun-dle branch refractory period, or a combination ofthe two.6

In the present patient, below the cycle lengthof 440 ms there was a gradual progression intoa complete bundle branch block manifested by aprogressive widening of the QRS when the car-diac cycles were decreased further. The pause inthe rhythm strip might be caused by an impair-ment of the sinus node impulse generation sec-ondary to hyperkalemia, or a subtle progressivelengthening of PR intervals followed by a blockedP wave that was buried inside the widened QRS-Tcomplex (i.e., Mobitz type I atrioventricular con-duction block). This transient pause permitted thenext atrial impulse conduct to the ventricle in arelatively normal pattern.

PACE, Vol. 26 September 2003 1909

Page 2: Rate Dependent Bundle Branch Block Induced by Hyperkalemia

MANOHAR, ET AL.

Figure 1. Rhythm strip showing rate dependent right bundle branch block (the middle third of this rhythm strip leadII is enlarged for clarity)(see Text for details).

References1. Pryor R, Blount SG Jr. The clinical significance of true left axis de-

viation, left intraventricular blocks. Am Heart J 1966; 72:391–413.2. Punja MM, Schneebaum R, Cohen J. Bifascicular block induced by

hyperkalemia. Electrocardiology 1973; 6:71–76.3. O’Neil JP, Chung EK. Unusual electrocardiographic finding—

bifascicular block due to hyperkalemia. Am J Med 1976; 61:537–540.4. Fisch C, Knoebel SB, Feigenbaum H, et al. Potassium and monopha-

sic action potentials, electrocardiogram, conduction and arrhyth-mias. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 1966; 8:387–418.

5. Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra R, et al. The effects of cycle length on cardiacrefractory periods in man. Circulation 1974; 49:32–41.

6. Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, et al. Electrophysiological observationsin patients with rate dependent bundle branch block. Circulation1975; 51:244–250.

1910 September 2003 PACE, Vol. 26