rationale for glif november 2004

14
Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Upload: tavita

Post on 11-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Rationale for GLIF November 2004. CA*net 4 Update. Network is now 3 x 10Gbps wavelengths Cost of wavelengths dropping dramatically 3 rd wavelength operational in June Support for e2e lightpaths for high end applications most top research institutions interested - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Rationale for GLIFNovember 2004

Page 2: Rationale for GLIF November 2004
Page 3: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

CA*net 4 Update

> Network is now 3 x 10Gbps wavelengths – Cost of wavelengths dropping dramatically– 3rd wavelength operational in June

> Support for e2e lightpaths for high end applications – most top research institutions interested– E.g. 10GbE CWDM to TRIUMF on UBC campus

> Future growth likely for international transit lightpaths> Korea, Taiwan, Ireland and others have purchased UCLP

lightpaths across CA*net4> In negotiation with other networks> UCLP being deployed on Internet2, TANet2, KREOnet,

i2CAT

Page 4: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

CA*net 4 is NOT an optical switched network

> CANARIE has no interest in optical experiments– E.g. HOPI, GMPLS, etc

> There are few applications that need 10 Gbps> There are few applications that require 2 Ghz + 2 Gbytes memory

on the PC> Cost of bandwidth is dramatically dropping

– Cost of wavelengths now affordable by individual researchers– CAVE*net good example

> CA*net 4 is made up of many parallel application empowered or customer empowered specific networks eg:– Computer back planes (Westgrid)– High energy physics network

> The CA*net 4 tries to answer the question how can these autonomous network islands interconnect to each other without a central organization like telco, CANARIE or Internet 2

Page 5: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

UCLP: Objectives

> Network management– integrate wavelengths and fiber from different suppliers – integrate within network management domain– offer VPNs to users

> Create discipline specific re-configurable IP networks– Multi-homed network which bypasses firewalls with direct connect to

servers and routers

> User controlled traffic engineering– Active replacement for Sockeye and Route Science– Alternative to MPLS

Page 6: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Today’s hierarchical IP network

ORAN

ORAN

ORAN

ORAN

University

Regional

National IP Network

Other national networks

Page 7: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Tomorrow’s peer to peer IP network

ORAN

ORAN

ORAN

ORAN

UniversityRegional

Anybody can peer with anybody

Server

World World

World

World

National IP Network

Page 8: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Creation of application VPNs

CommodityInternet

Bio-informaticsNetwork

University

University

University

CERN

University

University

High Energy Physics Network

eVLBI Network

Dept

Research Network

Page 9: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

UCLP intended for projects like National LambdaRail

NLR 2 partner acquires a separate wavelength between Seattle and Chicago and wants to manage it as part of its network including add/drop, routing, partition etc

NLR Condominium lambda network

Page 10: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

UCLP: Applications 1

> International Transit– Korea, Ireland, Taiwan layer 1 transit

– Other countries under negotiation> ORANs

– Layer 1 restoral and protections paths

– BCnet, ORANO and RISQ to date> Distributed back planes between HPC Grid centers

– Westgrid (1 GbE moving to 10 GbE)– AceNet to come

> Distributed Single Mount file systems– Yotta, Yotta - SGI

– Needs consistent performance and throughput – Frequent topology changes to meet needs of specific applications

Page 11: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

> ATLAS Canada – 980 Gbytes FCAL data once a month from CERN to Carleton U,

UoAlberta, UoArizona, etc– Will significantly increase to Terabytes when production runs start– Would take over 80 days on IP R&E network

> CERN Low level trigger data to UoAlberta– Initially streaming data rates 1 Gbps moving to 10Gbps later in the year

> Canadian virtual observatory– .5 Tbyte per day to UoToronto and UoHawaii– 250 Mbps continuous streaming from CCD devices

> Canada Light Source Synchrotron – remote streaming of data acquisition to UoAlberta – 2 to 5 Gbps continuously

UCLP: Applications 2

Page 12: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Typical Large system today

Sensor Sensor Instrument Instrument Sensor

Layer 2 switch

Layer 3 switch/router

SONET/DWDM

ProcessProcess

Process Process Process

SONET/DWDM

DMAS

Security Web Services OGSA

Internet

VPN

USER

Instrument Pod

Page 13: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Service Oriented Architectures

Sensor Sensor Instrument Instrument Sensor

Layer 2/3 switch

LAN

LAN

Data Management System

CA*net 4

VPN

USER

Instrument Pod

WS*

WS*WS

CA*net 4Lightpath

Process

ProcessWS**

WS*

Process

ProcessWS**

WS*

Process

ProcessWS

WS

Web serviceInterface

*CANARIE UCLP

**New web services

HPC

Page 14: Rationale for GLIF November 2004

Science user perspective

Sensor/InstrumentWS**

LANWS*Science Pod

LANWS*

Log Archive Process 1WS**

Log Archive Process 2WS**

ONS15454WS* NLR or CA*net 4

WS* CANARIE UCLP

WS* New Web service

DMAS

WS** New development

LightpathWS*

WS AAA process

WS**

User defined WSFL bindings

WS HPC Process

WS**

USER with WSFL binding software

UDDI orWSIL service registry