rawcar group v. grace medical et. al

Upload: priorsmart

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    1/19

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Frank A. Angileri (MI BAR No. P45611)Thomas W. Cunningham (MI Bar No. P57899)Rebecca J. Cantor (MI Bar No. P76826)William E. Thomson, Jr. (SBN 47195)Roland J. Tong (SBN 216836)[email protected]

    [email protected]@[email protected]@brookskushman.comBROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 Town CenterTwenty Second FloorSouthfield, MI 48075Tel.: 248.358.4400Fax: 248.358.3351

    Attorneys for PlaintiffRawCar Group LLC dbaCFI Medical Solutions

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    RAWCAR GROUP, LLC d/b/aCFI MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, aMichigan corporation,

    Plaintiff,v.

    GRACE MEDICAL, INC., aNevada corporation, PULSEMEDICAL, INC., a Georgiacorporation, PREFERREDMEDICAL PRODUCTS, aTennessee company, and A&BMEDICAL SPECIALTIES,

    LLC, an Ohio company,Defendants.

    Case No.

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT,TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT

    JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

    '13CV1105 BLMAJB

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    2/19

    1 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND

    Plaintiff RawCar Group, LLC d/b/a CFI Medical Solutions (CFI Medical

    Solutions) by and through their undersigned counsel, as and for its Complaintagainst defendants Grace Medical, Inc., Pulse Medical, Inc., Preferred Medical

    Products and A&B Medical Specialties, LLC (collectively, Defendants),

    respectfully alleges as follows:

    I. PARTIES1. Plaintiff CFI Medical Solutions is a Michigan Corporation with its

    principal place of business located at 14241 Fenton Rd, Fenton, MI 48430.

    2. On information and belief, Defendant Grace Medical, Inc. (GraceMedical) is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business located at

    2620 S. Maryland Ave, # 849, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109 and a registered office

    address of 1135 Terminal Way Suite 209, Reno, Nevada. Grace Medical also has a

    field office at 1380 Oak Hill Dr Spc 54, Escondido, California, 92027.

    3. On information and belief, Defendant Pulse Medical, Inc. (PulseMedical) is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business located at

    1130 Ada Street Suite B, Blue Ridge, Georgia and a registered office address of

    730 E Second St, Blue Ridge, Georgia.

    4. On information and belief, Defendant Preferred Medical Products(Preferred Medical) is a Tennessee company with its principal place of business

    located at 191 Industrial Dr., Ducktown, Tennessee.

    5. On information and belief, Defendant A&B Medical Specialties, LLC(A&B Medical) is a purported Ohio company with its principal place of business

    located at 760 Dancaster Dr., Maineville, Ohio.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    3/19

    2 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE6. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws

    of the United States, title 35 of the United States, for trademark infringement in

    violation of the Lanham Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), and for

    copyright infringement under the copyright laws of the United States, title 37 of

    the United States.

    7. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims hereinpursuant to U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). This Court also has supplemental

    jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) over CFI Medical Solutions state law

    claims.

    8. Venue and personal jurisdiction are appropriate in this Court under 28U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1400(b) because one or more defendants are located in this

    District and/or have committed acts of infringement in this District, and because a

    substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to CFI Medical Solutions

    claims occurred in this District.

    III. FACTUAL BACKGROUNDA. CFI Medical Solutions Patent Rights

    9. CFI Medical Solutions develops, manufactures and sells, inter alia,medical products including, but not limited to, sterile equipment covers, patient

    positioning aids, radiation protection and rehabilitative aids.

    10. On October 25, 2011, U.S. Patent No. 8,042,549 (hereinafter the549 patent) entitledSterile Radiological Drape was duly and lawfully issued to

    Serge Kaska (Kaska). A true and correct copy of the 549 patent is attached as

    Exhibit 1.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    4/19

    3 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    11. Emerging Medical Technology is the owner by assignment of the 549patent. The assignment from Kaska to Emerging Medical Technology duly

    executed on September 29, 2009.

    12. CFI Medical Solutions is, and at all times relevant has been, theexclusive licensee of the 549 patent for the making, using and/or selling products

    embodying the invention of the 549 patent in connection with the medical

    industry.

    13. On October 16, 2012, U.S. Patent No. 8,286,637 (hereinafter the637 patent) entitled Sterile Radiological Imaging Unit Drape and Method of

    Providing a Sterile Surface Therewith was duly and lawfully issued to SergeKaska. The 637 patent is a continuation-in-part of the 549 patent. A true and

    correct copy of the 637 patent is attached as Exhibit 2.

    14. Emerging Medical Technology is the owner by assignment of the 637patent, duly executed on September 29, 2009.

    15. CFI Medical Solutions is, and at all times relevant has been, theexclusive licensee of the 637 patent for the making, using and/or selling products

    embodying the invention of the 637 patent in connection with the medical

    industry.

    16. CFI Medical Solutions manufactures, markets and sells C-ARMOR,a sterile equipment cover made under the 549 patent and the 637 patent.

    17. CFI Medical Solutions sells its C-ARMOR product in the UnitedStates.

    18. CFI Medical Solutions marked the products embodying the inventionclaimed in the 549 patent and the 637 patent in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 287.

    B. CFI Medical Solutions Trademark Rights19. CFI Medical Solutions is the owner of all right, title and interest in

    and to, including all rights to recover for past infringement thereof, and goodwill

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    5/19

    4 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    associated with, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,994,704 for the trademark C-

    ARMOR, used in connection with, inter alia, sterile surgical drapes for use at

    surgical sites, for covering patients on surgical tables, and for covering radiological

    imaging equipment sold in interstate commerce, by virtue of an assignment from

    trademark registrant Emerging Medical Technology, Inc. A true and correct copy

    of the Trademark Registration No. 3,994,704 is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.

    20. CFI Medical Solutions continuously uses the C-ARMOR trademarkin connection with the promotion, advertising, and sale of medical equipment

    covers and other products and services and has since well before the acts of

    Defendants complained herein.21. CFI Medical Solutions spends thousands of dollars and expends

    significant effort in advertising, promoting, and developing the C-ARMOR

    trademark throughout the world. As a result of such advertising expenditures, CFI

    Medical Solutions established considerable goodwill in the C-ARMOR

    trademark. The C-ARMOR trademark is a valuable asset of substantial worth to

    CFI Medical Solutions.

    C. CFI Medical Solutions Copyright22. On May 24, 2010, CFI Medical hired Digital Outpost to create a 2-3

    minute video showing the benefits of the C-ARMOR product (the C-ARMOR

    video). CFI Medical has since published the C-ARMOR video on its website.

    CFI Medical has also made certain screenshots of the C-ARMOR video available

    on its website (the C-ARMORphotos). Examples of two of the C-ARMOR

    photos are shown below:

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    6/19

    5 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    23. The C-ARMOR video and the C-ARMOR photos were works madefor hire. CFI Medical Solutions is the owner if both the C-ARMOR video and the

    C-ARMOR photos.

    24. On April 29, 2013, CFI Medical filed copyright registrationapplications for the C-ARMOR

    photos with the U.S. Copyright Office.

    D. Defendants Common Activities (Facts Common to All Defendants)25. On information and belief, Defendants have made, used, sold, offered

    for sale and/or imported in the United States, a product under the name C-SHIELD

    lateral C-Arm drape.

    26. The C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape incorporates the patentedinvention claimed in the 549 patent.

    27. The C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape incorporates the patentedinvention claimed in the 637 patent.

    28. CFI Medical Solutions gave notice to Defendants that medicalequipment covers made and sold under the 549 patent and the 637 patent are

    patented by marking such products in accordance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C.

    287 and/or by giving direct notice of infringement to Defendants.

    29. On information and belief, CFI Medical Solutions gave verbal noticeto Grace Medical of infringement of its licensed patents through the

    manufacturing, marketing and sale of Defendants C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm

    drape.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    7/19

    6 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    30. On information and belief, Defendants have used, and continue to use,a mark confusingly similar to the C-ARMOR trademark to advertise and sell its

    products, namely the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape, throughout the United

    States.

    31. Defendants did not and do not have consent, license, approval or otherauthorization to use marks confusingly similar to the C-ARMOR trademark in

    the manner set forth herein.

    32. Defendants use of marks confusingly similar to the C-ARMORtrademark as alleged in the foregoing paragraphs clearly shows the willful intent of

    Defendants to misrepresent the source of Defendants goods so as to causeconfusion, mistake orto deceive as to Defendants connection or association with

    CFI Medical Solutions.

    E. Defendant Grace Medical, Inc.s Activities33. On information and belief, Grace Medical is a nationwide supplier of

    medical products, supplies and devices used in the operating room, radiology,

    catheterization laboratories, endoscopy suites, doctors offices and surgery centers.

    34. On information and belief, Grace Medical is a nationwide supplier ofthe C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape.

    35. On information and belief, Grace Medical attended the Association ofperiOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) trade show held from March 2, 2013

    to March 7, 2013 in San Diego, California.

    36. On information and belief, Grace Medical exhibited medical products,including C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape, at the AORN trade show.

    37. On information and belief, Grace Medical acted in concert with PulseMedical to exhibit medical products at a booth at the AORN trade show rented by

    the David Scott Company.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    8/19

    7 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    38. On information and belief, Grace Medical displayed the C-SHIELDlateral C-Arm drape at the AORN trade show.

    39. On information and belief, Grace Medical disseminated advertisementmaterials, including flyers, for the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape at the AORN

    trade show.

    40. On March 5, 2013, Gilbert Sierra, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Grace Medical, sent communications regarding the alleged infringement

    of its C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape to John Lochner, a CFI Medical Solutions

    employee, and to Dr. Serge Kaska, President of Emerging Medical Technology

    and the inventor of the 549 and 637 patents.41. On March 9, 2013, Gilbert Sierra sent e-mail correspondence

    regarding the alleged infringement of its C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape to Mike

    Czop, President of CFI Medical Solutions, and to Dr. Serge Kaska.

    F. Defendant Pulse Medical, Inc.s Activities42. On information and belief, Pulse Medical is a supplier of radiation

    protection and x-ray accessories specializing in leaded aprons and leaded eyewear.

    43. On information and belief, Pulse Medical is a supplier of the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape.

    44. On information and belief, Defendant Pulse Medical attended theAORN trade show held from March 2, 2013 to March March 7, 2013 in San

    Diego, California.

    45. On information and belief, Pulse Medical exhibited medical products,including the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape, at the AORN trade show.

    46. On information and belief, Pulse Medical acted in concert with GraceMedical to exhibit medical products at the AORN trade show.

    47. On information and belief, Pulse Medical and Grace Medical acted inconcert to display the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape at the AORN trade show.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    9/19

    8 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    48. On information and belief, Pulse Medical disseminated advertisementmaterials, including flyers, for the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape at the AORN

    trade show.

    G. Defendant Preferred Medical Products Activities49. On information and belief, Preferred Medical is a manufacturer of

    sterile and non-sterile equipment covers to the medical industry.

    50. On information and belief, Preferred Medical is a marketer,manufacturer and distributor of the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape and does so

    nationwide, including in this District.

    51. Upon information and belief, Preferred Medical manufactures the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape that is supplied by Grace Medical, Pulse Medical

    and A&B Medical.

    52. On information and belief, on or before February 12, 2013, DefendantPreferred Medical began manufacturing, marketing and/or distributing the C-

    SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape as evidenced by video on Youtube.com at

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tpV2qMWmlI.

    H. Defendant A&B Medical Specialties Activities53. On information and belief, A&B Medical is a supplier of medical

    products.

    54. On information and belief, A&B Medical is a supplier of the C-SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape as advertised on its websitehttp://www.abmedspecialties.com/NEW-PRODUCTS.html.

    55. On information and belief, A&B Medical has copied and publishedthe C-ARMOR photos for the purpose of advertising its C-SHIELD lateral C-

    Arm drape. Examples of the photos copied by A&B Medical are shown below:

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    10/19

    9 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    56. The photos that A&B Medical has copied and published aresubstantially similar to the C-ARMOR photos.

    57. Because the C-ARMOR photos were published on CFI Medicalswebsite, A&B Medical had access to the C-ARMOR photos.

    58. On information and belief, A&B Medical has sales representativeslocated in Northern and Southern California.

    IV. COUNT I:INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,042,549

    (Alleged against All Defendants)

    59. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of thepreceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    60. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, the 549 patent is presumed valid.61. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe, directly,

    contributorily or by inducement, one or more claims of the 549 patent by making,

    using, selling, and/or offering to sell in this country, without a license, the C-

    SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271.62. On information and belief, Defendants infringement of the 549

    patent has been and continues to be willful and carried out with full knowledge of

    the 549 patent.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    11/19

    10 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    63. By reason of Defendants infringing activities, CFI Medical Solutionshas been and will continue to be damaged by Defendants infringement of the 549

    patent.

    64. CFI Medical Solutions has been irreparably harmed by Defendantsinfringement of the 549 patent. CFI Medical Solutions will continue to be

    irreparably harmed unless that infringement is enjoined.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    12/19

    11 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    V. COUNT IIINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,286,637

    (Alleged against All Defendants)65. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of the

    preceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    66. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, the 637 patent is presumed valid.67. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe, directly,

    contributorily or by inducement, one or more claims of the 637 patent by making,

    using, selling, and/or offering to sell in this country, without a license, the C-

    SHIELD lateral C-Arm drape, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271.

    68. On information and belief, Defendants infringement of the 637patent has been and continues to be willful and carried out with full knowledge of

    the 637 patent.

    69. By reason of Defendants infringing activities, CFI Medical Solutionshas been and will continue to be damaged by Defendants infringement of the 637

    patent.

    70. CFI Medical Solutions has been irreparably harmed by Defendantsinfringement of the 637 patent. CFI Medical Solutions will continue to be

    irreparably harmed unless that infringement is enjoined.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    13/19

    12 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    VI. COUNT IIITRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

    (Alleged against All Defendants)71. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of the

    preceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    72. Defendants wrongful use of the name C-SHIELD infringes CFIMedical Solutions registered trademark C-ARMOR and is likely to cause

    confusion, mistake and deception of the public as to the identity and origin of

    Defendants goods, causing irreparable harm to CFI Medical Solutions for which

    there is no adequate remedy at law.

    73. By reason of the foregoing acts, Defendants are liable to CFI MedicalSolutions for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125(a).

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    14/19

    13 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    VII. COUNT IVCOPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT UNDER 17 U.S.C. 501

    (Alleged against Defendant A&B Medical)

    74. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of thepreceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    75. CFI Medical has complied with all aspects of the law of copyright,and secured the exclusive rights and privileges in the copyrights for the C-

    ARMOR photos, including filing an application for registration with the

    Copyright Office.

    76. Defendant A&B Medical has infringed upon the copyrights for the C-ARMOR photos under 17 U.S.C. 501 through copying and displaying the C-

    ARMOR photos.

    77. On information and belief, the infringement by A&B Medical hasbeen willful.

    78. The acts by A&B Medical will continue and will cause irreparableharm to CFI Medical unless restrained by the Court. There is no adequate remedy

    at law to compensate for the continued harm.

    79. By reason of the foregoing acts, A&B Medical is liable to CFIMedical Solutions for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. 501.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    15/19

    14 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    VIII. COUNT VSTATUTORY UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FALSE ADVERTISING

    UNDER CALIFORNIA STATE LAW(Alleged against All Defendants)

    80. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of thepreceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    81. Defendants actions described above and specifically, withoutlimitation, Defendants use of the C-ARMOR trademark, and confusingly similar

    variations thereof, in commerce to advertise, market, and sell the C-SHIELD

    lateral C-Arm drape constitute trademark infringement, false advertising, and

    unfair competition in violation of the laws of the State of California.

    82. By these actions, Defendants engaged in false advertising and unfaircompetition in violation of the statutory law of the state of California, Cal. Bus. &

    Prof. Code 17200 and 17500, et seq., and, as a result, CFI Medical Solutions

    has suffered and will continue to suffer damage to its business, reputation, and

    goodwill.

    83. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants willful and intentionalactions, CFI Medical Solutions has suffered damages and, unless Defendants are

    enjoined, CFI Medical Solutions will continue to suffer irreparable damage.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    16/19

    15 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    IX. COUNT VICOMMON LAW INJURY TO BUSINESS REPUTATION

    (Alleged against All Defendants)84. CFI Medical Solutions repeats and realleges the allegations of the

    preceding paragraphs as of set forth herein.

    85. CFI Medical Solutions alleges that Defendants wrongful use of CFIMedical Solutions trademark inures to and creates a likelihood of injury to CFI

    Medical Solutions business reputation because persons encountering CFI Medical

    Solutions and its products and services will believe that CFI Medical Solutions is

    affiliated with or related to or has the approval of Defendants, and any adverse

    reaction by the public to Defendants and the quality of its products and the nature

    of its business will injure the business reputation of CFI Medical Solutions and the

    goodwill that it enjoys in connection with its mark C-ARMOR.

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    17/19

    16 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief:

    a. A judgment that Defendants infringed the 549 patent;

    b. A judgment that Defendants infringed the 637 patent;

    c. A preliminary and permanent injunction, issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C.

    283, restraining and enjoining Defendants and their officers, agents, attorneys and

    employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from infringing the 549

    patent for the full term thereof;

    d. A preliminary and permanent injunction, issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C.

    283, restraining and enjoining Defendants and their officers, agents, attorneys and

    employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from infringing the 637

    patent for the full term thereof;

    e. A declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award of attorneys

    fees, disbursements, and costs of this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;

    f. A judgment that Defendants infringed the C-ARMOR mark;

    g. A preliminary and permanent injunction, issued pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

    1116(a), restraining and enjoining Defendants and their officer, agents, attorneys and

    employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from infringing the C-

    ARMOR mark;

    h. An order requiring Defendants to deliver up for destruction or other

    disposition by Plaintiff all advertisements, brochures, labels, packaging, signs, prints,

    decals, business cards, order forms, and all other materials in Defendants possession,

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    18/19

    17 COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    custody, or control that are labeled with C-SHIELD, alone or in combination with

    other words pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1118;

    i. A judgment that Defendants be required to pay damages pursuant to 15

    U.S.C. 1117(a), including Defendants profits, damages that Plaintiff has sustained

    as a result of Defendants trademark infringement, and the costs of this action;

    j. A declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award of attorneys

    fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a);

    k. A judgment that A&B Medical has infringed Plaintiffs copyrights;

    l. An award of statutory damages against A&B Medical under 17 U.S.C.

    504(c), and costs, including attorneys fees, under 17 U.S.C. 505;

    m. A declaration that this case is an exceptional case and an award of

    attorneys fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1117(a);

    n. A preliminary and permanent injunction, issued pursuant to 17 U.S.C.

    502(a), restraining and enjoining A&B Medical and its officer, agents, attorneys and

    employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from infringing

    Plaintiffs copyrights;

    o. A judgment that Defendants conduct constitutes unfair competition and

    false advertising under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 and 17500, et seq.;

    p. A preliminary and permanent injunction, issued pursuant to Cal. Bus. &

    Prof. Code 17203, restraining and enjoining Defendants and their officer, agents,

  • 7/30/2019 Rawcar Group v. Grace Medical et. al.

    19/19

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from

    committing acts of unfair competition and false advertising; and

    q. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

    Dated: May 8, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

    By: /s/ William E. Thomson, Jr.Frank A. Angileri (MI BAR No. P45611)Thomas W. Cunningham (MI Bar No. P57899)Rebecca J. Cantor (MI Bar No. P76826)William E. Thomson, Jr. SBN 47195)Roland J. Tong (SBN 216836)

    [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected] KUSHMAN P.C.1000 Town CenterTwenty Second FloorSouthfield, MI 48075Tel.: 248.358.4400 / Fax: 248.358.3351

    Attorneys for Plaintiff