rca bi
DESCRIPTION
BITRANSCRIPT
ETR, TOV DAN PENCAPAIAN SPM 2014
A B C D E LULUS G % GPS
SPM 2013 7 10 9 18 23 67 33 67 7.03
ETR MP 3 7 10 21 26 67 32 67.68 7.33
TOV 2014 1 7 27 7 8 50 48 51.02 7.42
UP1 0 3 20 14 11 48 42 53 7.71
UP2 1 7 27 4 11 50 45 52.63 7.37
PERCUBAAN 2 14 22 8 8 54 43 55.67 7.04
AR
BAHASA INGGERIS
STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &
STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS
WEAKNESSES
STUDENTS ARE VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 –i.e. CONTINUOUS
WRITING
STUDENTS LACK OF IDEA AND ELABORATE JUST
SUFFICIENTLY
VOCABULARY IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH
WEAK IN SECTION A-RATIONAL CLOZE
STRATEGIES
GIVE MORE GUIDED MODULE WRITING FOR
PRACTISE
50 ESSAY WRITING PROGRAMME SHOULD BE
CONTINUED
VOCAB THON –TO WIDEN THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY
DRILLING ON GRAMMAR PRACTISE EXERCISE
ENGLISH CLINIC
WRITE IT RIGHT
•EXCELLENT AND POTENTIAL STUDENTS
STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &
STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS
* CRITICAL STUDENTS
WEAKNESSES
OVERALL VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 & 2
FOR PAPER 2 VERY WEAK IN SECTION A-ESPECIALLY RATIONAL CLOZE
FOR SECTION B- COULD NOT IDENTIFY AND TRANSFER INFORMATION CORRECTLY
SECTION C – ERRORS THROUGHOUT READING COMPREHENSION.STUDENTS NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE
MAIN IDEA/DETAILS IN TEXT
ONLY ABLE TO REWRITE THE EXTRACT FROM TEXT FOR SUMMARY-i.e. WHOLESALE LIFTING
NOT ABLE TO FIND THE MESSAGE FROM POEM IN SECTION D AND LACK OF POINTS FOR NOVEL
MOST STUDENTS DID NOT ATTEMPT FOR WRITING ESSAY
STUDENTS NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TOWARDS ENGLISH
STRATEGIES
DRILLING EXERCISE FOR PAPER 2 –ESPECIALLY ON GRAMMAR PART
FOCUS MORE ON SECTION WHERE MARKS COULD EASILY ACQUIRED
MEMORISING TECHNIQUE – FOR ESSAY AND NOVEL
VOCABTHON
GUIDED ESSAY MODULE
WRITE IT RIGHT
STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &
STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS
* BORDERLINE STUDENTS
WEAKNESSES
VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 – BOTH SECTION A & B
IDEA IS SO VERY LIMITED TO WRITE
COULD NOT ELABORATE MORE AND LACK OF VOCABULARY
WRITING IS SHORT & SIMPLE WITH A LOT OF ERRORS IN SENTENCE
STRUCTURE
VERY WEAK IN NOVEL
PAPER 2 – LOW MARKS FOR EVERY SECTION ESPECIALLY FOR GRAMMAR
QUESTION IN RATIONAL CLOZE
STRATEGIESSIMPLE GUIDED MODULE
ESSAY
ENPHASIS TO WRITE-i.e. 50 ESSAY PROGRAMME
VOCAB THON –TO WIDEN THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY
MEMORISING ESSAY METHOD FOR e.g; ONE WORD ESSAY
GRAMMAR DRILLING EXERCISE
DRILLNG EXERCISE ON PAPER 2
REWRITING PROCESS FOR NOVEL
COACHING APPROACH
ENGLISH CLINIC
WRITE IT RIGHT
NAMA GURU :NORLIAH BINTI MAHMOOD
MATA PELAJARAN : BAHASA INGGERIS
TINGKATAN : 5 SAINS/5EKONOMI
SUBJECT (TOV)
Berasaskan RCA
TOTAL
STUDENT
A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT
INTERVENSI
B.INGGERIS 21 1 1 5 8 4 2 0 6
PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 pelajar ke gred C/Ct
6pelajar
sangat lemah
dlm kertas 1
bhgn A dan B
Tidak ada idea,terlalu banyak kesalahan dalam penulisan dan menghasilkan skrip yang pendek
FAKTOR GAGAL;DIRECTED AND CONTINUOUS WRITING.MENGHASILKAN SKRIP KARANGAN YANG SANGAT LEMAH
DALAM KEDUA-DUA BHAHAGIAN
Tidak dapat mengenalpasti tatabahasa yang tepat dan betul dalam membina ayat
walaupun mudahSangat lemah
perbendaharaan kata
Tidak dapat membina ayat yang betul dan salah yang
serius dalam ejaan
HEAD
COUNTPLAN
DO
(TIME FRAME)CHECK ACT
6
Bahagian A: Dan B KERTAS 1
1.Mengajar dan memberi panduan mengenalpasti kata kunci dan
tatabahasa dalam membina struktur ayat
2.Menggunakan model karangan yang mudah sbgai acuan
Dan latihan menulis
3latihan tatabahasa(grammar) membina ayat yang mudah
3,Menfokus satu tajuk karangan sebagai panduan
5 minggu
Iseptember-
Oktober 1 5
5
1. Sesi pengajaran diteruskan dan diberi penekanan yang
lebih pada bentuk bentuk soalan.
2. Setiap pelajar dipantau dari masa ke semasa
3. Bentuk latihan diberi sama diberi diatas
4. Guru membimbing dan mengikuti pencapaian pelajar
3minggu
oktober
SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL
BIL NAMA MARKAH
1. Hanis Nasuha Bt Harith 41(E)
2. Norhasnie Bt Md Saad 40(E)
3. Nisreen Bt Ahmad Najid 48(D)
4. Nur Ain Shahira Bt Zamri 46(D)
5. Khairol Azman Bin Zakariya 47(D)
6. Nik Ahmad Firdaus Iqmal 49(D)
NAMA GURU : NORLIAH BINTI MAHMOOD
MATA PELAJARAN : BAHASA INGGERIS
TINGKATAN : 5 P/MPV(SET 4)
SUBJECT (TOV)
Berasaskan RCA
TOTAL
STUDENT
+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT
INTERVENSI
B.INGGERIS 27 2 25 10
PROBLEM STATEMENT 10 Orang Pelajar Galus Dari 25 Orang Gagal
10 orang
pelajar galus
Tidak mahir mencuri kata kunci dalam soalan
Faktor gagal:Tajuk :Bah.C ( kertas 2 )Teks bentuk bacaan kefahaman ,isi penting dalam petikan dan perbendaharaan kata/makna dalam konteks 0
Tidak dapat memahami dan mencari kata kunci dalam teks
Menjawab tidak mengikut kehendak
soalan
Tidak dapat memahami petikan dan perbendaraan
kata
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAM
HEAD
COUNTPLAN
DO
(TIME
FRAME)
CHECK A CT
10
Bahagian C Kertas 2
1. Mengajar mengenal pasti kata kunci penting dalam petikan
2. Dan cara menjawab mengikut kehendak soalan.
3. Teknik mencari jawapan dalam petikan
5minggu
SEPTEMB
ER -
OKTOBER
1 9
9
1.Memberi penekanan berterusan dan latihan dalam mengenal
pasti kata kunci penting yang biasa diguna dalam soalan.
3minggu
oktober
SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL
BIL NAMA MARKAH
1. Muhd Amir Hamzah Bin Osman 25
2. Nor Syafiqah Bt Mohd Sefeandi 21
3. Nor Shuhadah Bt Azizi 29
4. Siti Atiqah Bt Abd .Aziz 21
5. Mohd Syafiq Mohd Yusop 29
6. Siti Nor Hamizah Bt Razali 19
7. Shahrol Amir Bin Roslan 19
8. Hazril Abu Hassan 30
9. Mohd Nor Issam Bin Zainor 21
10. Nira Norfarizaaida Daud 19
11. Muhd Damsyik 12
12. Suhaida Bt Zaabarudin 16
13. Zulaily Shafina 12
14. Abdul Hakim Bin Jamil 13
SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL
BIL NAMA MARKAH
15. Mohd Zulfitri Abd Rashid 13
16. Shahrol Amirol Bin Roslan 8
17. 26
18. Mohd Nor Issam Zainor 10
19. Mohd Zulfitri Abd Rashid 13
20. Shahrol Amirol Bin Roslan 17
21. Muhd Muaiyim 14
22 Nik Mohd Mazrin Nik Mazli 14
23. Azizi Ariff Bin Ab.Hamid 12
24. Muhd Fazrul Izwan Mat Peddeli 10
25. Muhd Shafiq Bin Zolkifli 8
26. Muhd Hafiz Hashim 10
27. Siti Atiqah Aziz 21
*
NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD
MATA PELAJARAN : ENGLISH 1119
TINGKATAN : FORM 5 SET 1
SUBJECT
Berasaskan RCA
UP 1
TOTAL
STUDENT
A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT
INTERVENSI
ENGLISH 23 1 1 6 5 4 4 1 1 0 6
PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 ss DID NOT GET AT LEAST A-
6 ss did not
get at least
A-
Weakness in writing complex sentences
Weakness in Subject Verb Agreement and using linkers Weakness in
generating ideas
Weakness in writing compound sentences
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMPAPER 1 DIRECTED WRITING & CONTINUOUS WRITING
HEAD
COUNTPLAN
DO
(TIME
FRAME)
CHECK ACT
6
Sentence Building Practice
-Teach students how to write compound sentences and
complex sentences.
-Drilling students to write simple sentences and turn them into
compound and complex sentences.
-Drilling students to use expressions and idioms
Sept - Okt 4 2
2
Expose students to sentence patterns for directed writing
Drilling students on sample sentence patterns for directed
writing.
Drilling students to use linkers
Sept - Okt 2 0
0
Memorizing technique for continuous essay
Sept - Okt
NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD
MATA PELAJARAN : English 1119
KELAS : FORM 5 SET 1
SUBJECT
Berasaskan
RCA
UP 1
TOTAL
STUDENT
A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT
INTERVENSI
ENGLISH
1119
23 1 1 6 5
1
4
1
4 1 1 0 6PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 ss DID NOT GET AT LEAST C+
6 students
did not get
at least C+
Inability to answer HOTS questions
Weakness in vocabularyWeakness in tenses
and SVA
Inability to remember facts on poems learnt
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMKERTAS 2 Rationale Cloze & Short Texts and Literature
HEADCOUNTPLAN
DO
(TIME
FRAME)
CHECK ACT
6
• Drilling questions on grammar : SVA, tenses
• Intensive exercises on grammar work Sept - Okt 2 4
4 Memorizing techniques – poems Sept - Okt 2 2
2 Smart Novel – techniques in answering novel
questions
Sept - Okt
NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD
MATA PELAJARAN : ENGLISH 1119
TINGKATAN : FORM 5 SET 3
SUBJECT
Berasaskan
RCA
UP 2
TOTAL
STUDENT
A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT
INTERVENSI
ENGLISH 26 2 3 3 18 18
PROBLEM STATEMENT 18 STUDENTS FAIL
18 ss fail
Unable to lift details in summary
Weakness in understanding simple sentences Very weak in grammar
Unable to match questions with possible answers
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMPAPER 2 READING COMP & GRAPHIC MATERIALS
HEAD
COUNTPLAN
DO
(TIME
FRAME)
CHECK ACT
18
1) Identify key words : WH questions
2) Drilling of questions for Sec A – Rationale Cloze
3) Identifying keywords for each questions
4 weeks
Sept - Okt
5 13
13 1) Drilling of lifting techniques for reading comprehension
2) Drilling of lifting techniques for summary
4 weeks
Sept - Okt 5 8
8 1) Drilling of lifting techniques for reading comprehension
2) Drilling of lifting techniques for summary
4 weeks
Okt
0
0
*
*Fariz Muhd Husaini 25
*Mohd Hafiz Basar 29
*Muhd Nurfikri Jafri 29
*Kamasuriza M.Ariffin 32
*Nazratul Nadhirah 32
*Nor Hafizah 20
*Nur Aishah Zulkifli 33
*Nurul Syafieka 23
*Raja Muhd Syafiq 32
*Nur Liyana Md Rosni 34
*Nurul Shuhada 32
*Siti Natrah 32
*M.Arrisham 26
*M. Shazrin 33
*M. Fahmi 34
*M.Iqram 27
*M.Khairul Bhe 22
*M. Khairul Shahdan 28