rca bi

25
ETR, TOV DAN PENCAPAIAN SPM 2014 A B C D E LULUS G % GPS SPM 2013 7 10 9 18 23 67 33 67 7.03 ETR MP 3 7 10 21 26 67 32 67.68 7.33 TOV 2014 1 7 27 7 8 50 48 51.02 7.42 UP1 0 3 20 14 11 48 42 53 7.71 UP2 1 7 27 4 11 50 45 52.63 7.37 PERCUBAAN 2 14 22 8 8 54 43 55.67 7.04 AR BAHASA INGGERIS

Upload: smkchemomoi

Post on 22-Jun-2015

199 views

Category:

Education


5 download

DESCRIPTION

BI

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rca bi

ETR, TOV DAN PENCAPAIAN SPM 2014

A B C D E LULUS G % GPS

SPM 2013 7 10 9 18 23 67 33 67 7.03

ETR MP 3 7 10 21 26 67 32 67.68 7.33

TOV 2014 1 7 27 7 8 50 48 51.02 7.42

UP1 0 3 20 14 11 48 42 53 7.71

UP2 1 7 27 4 11 50 45 52.63 7.37

PERCUBAAN 2 14 22 8 8 54 43 55.67 7.04

AR

BAHASA INGGERIS

Page 2: Rca bi
Page 3: Rca bi
Page 4: Rca bi
Page 5: Rca bi

STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &

STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS

WEAKNESSES

STUDENTS ARE VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 –i.e. CONTINUOUS

WRITING

STUDENTS LACK OF IDEA AND ELABORATE JUST

SUFFICIENTLY

VOCABULARY IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH

WEAK IN SECTION A-RATIONAL CLOZE

STRATEGIES

GIVE MORE GUIDED MODULE WRITING FOR

PRACTISE

50 ESSAY WRITING PROGRAMME SHOULD BE

CONTINUED

VOCAB THON –TO WIDEN THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY

DRILLING ON GRAMMAR PRACTISE EXERCISE

ENGLISH CLINIC

WRITE IT RIGHT

•EXCELLENT AND POTENTIAL STUDENTS

Page 6: Rca bi

STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &

STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS

* CRITICAL STUDENTS

WEAKNESSES

OVERALL VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 & 2

FOR PAPER 2 VERY WEAK IN SECTION A-ESPECIALLY RATIONAL CLOZE

FOR SECTION B- COULD NOT IDENTIFY AND TRANSFER INFORMATION CORRECTLY

SECTION C – ERRORS THROUGHOUT READING COMPREHENSION.STUDENTS NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE

MAIN IDEA/DETAILS IN TEXT

ONLY ABLE TO REWRITE THE EXTRACT FROM TEXT FOR SUMMARY-i.e. WHOLESALE LIFTING

NOT ABLE TO FIND THE MESSAGE FROM POEM IN SECTION D AND LACK OF POINTS FOR NOVEL

MOST STUDENTS DID NOT ATTEMPT FOR WRITING ESSAY

STUDENTS NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TOWARDS ENGLISH

STRATEGIES

DRILLING EXERCISE FOR PAPER 2 –ESPECIALLY ON GRAMMAR PART

FOCUS MORE ON SECTION WHERE MARKS COULD EASILY ACQUIRED

MEMORISING TECHNIQUE – FOR ESSAY AND NOVEL

VOCABTHON

GUIDED ESSAY MODULE

WRITE IT RIGHT

Page 7: Rca bi

STUDENTS’ WEAKNESSES &

STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE PROBLEMS

* BORDERLINE STUDENTS

WEAKNESSES

VERY WEAK IN PAPER 1 – BOTH SECTION A & B

IDEA IS SO VERY LIMITED TO WRITE

COULD NOT ELABORATE MORE AND LACK OF VOCABULARY

WRITING IS SHORT & SIMPLE WITH A LOT OF ERRORS IN SENTENCE

STRUCTURE

VERY WEAK IN NOVEL

PAPER 2 – LOW MARKS FOR EVERY SECTION ESPECIALLY FOR GRAMMAR

QUESTION IN RATIONAL CLOZE

STRATEGIESSIMPLE GUIDED MODULE

ESSAY

ENPHASIS TO WRITE-i.e. 50 ESSAY PROGRAMME

VOCAB THON –TO WIDEN THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY

MEMORISING ESSAY METHOD FOR e.g; ONE WORD ESSAY

GRAMMAR DRILLING EXERCISE

DRILLNG EXERCISE ON PAPER 2

REWRITING PROCESS FOR NOVEL

COACHING APPROACH

ENGLISH CLINIC

WRITE IT RIGHT

Page 8: Rca bi

NAMA GURU :NORLIAH BINTI MAHMOOD

MATA PELAJARAN : BAHASA INGGERIS

TINGKATAN : 5 SAINS/5EKONOMI

SUBJECT (TOV)

Berasaskan RCA

TOTAL

STUDENT

A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT

INTERVENSI

B.INGGERIS 21 1 1 5 8 4 2 0 6

PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 pelajar ke gred C/Ct

6pelajar

sangat lemah

dlm kertas 1

bhgn A dan B

Tidak ada idea,terlalu banyak kesalahan dalam penulisan dan menghasilkan skrip yang pendek

FAKTOR GAGAL;DIRECTED AND CONTINUOUS WRITING.MENGHASILKAN SKRIP KARANGAN YANG SANGAT LEMAH

DALAM KEDUA-DUA BHAHAGIAN

Tidak dapat mengenalpasti tatabahasa yang tepat dan betul dalam membina ayat

walaupun mudahSangat lemah

perbendaharaan kata

Tidak dapat membina ayat yang betul dan salah yang

serius dalam ejaan

Page 9: Rca bi

HEAD

COUNTPLAN

DO

(TIME FRAME)CHECK ACT

6

Bahagian A: Dan B KERTAS 1

1.Mengajar dan memberi panduan mengenalpasti kata kunci dan

tatabahasa dalam membina struktur ayat

2.Menggunakan model karangan yang mudah sbgai acuan

Dan latihan menulis

3latihan tatabahasa(grammar) membina ayat yang mudah

3,Menfokus satu tajuk karangan sebagai panduan

5 minggu

Iseptember-

Oktober 1 5

5

1. Sesi pengajaran diteruskan dan diberi penekanan yang

lebih pada bentuk bentuk soalan.

2. Setiap pelajar dipantau dari masa ke semasa

3. Bentuk latihan diberi sama diberi diatas

4. Guru membimbing dan mengikuti pencapaian pelajar

3minggu

oktober

Page 10: Rca bi

SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL

BIL NAMA MARKAH

1. Hanis Nasuha Bt Harith 41(E)

2. Norhasnie Bt Md Saad 40(E)

3. Nisreen Bt Ahmad Najid 48(D)

4. Nur Ain Shahira Bt Zamri 46(D)

5. Khairol Azman Bin Zakariya 47(D)

6. Nik Ahmad Firdaus Iqmal 49(D)

Page 11: Rca bi

NAMA GURU : NORLIAH BINTI MAHMOOD

MATA PELAJARAN : BAHASA INGGERIS

TINGKATAN : 5 P/MPV(SET 4)

SUBJECT (TOV)

Berasaskan RCA

TOTAL

STUDENT

+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT

INTERVENSI

B.INGGERIS 27 2 25 10

PROBLEM STATEMENT 10 Orang Pelajar Galus Dari 25 Orang Gagal

10 orang

pelajar galus

Tidak mahir mencuri kata kunci dalam soalan

Faktor gagal:Tajuk :Bah.C ( kertas 2 )Teks bentuk bacaan kefahaman ,isi penting dalam petikan dan perbendaharaan kata/makna dalam konteks 0

Tidak dapat memahami dan mencari kata kunci dalam teks

Menjawab tidak mengikut kehendak

soalan

Tidak dapat memahami petikan dan perbendaraan

kata

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAM

Page 12: Rca bi

HEAD

COUNTPLAN

DO

(TIME

FRAME)

CHECK A CT

10

Bahagian C Kertas 2

1. Mengajar mengenal pasti kata kunci penting dalam petikan

2. Dan cara menjawab mengikut kehendak soalan.

3. Teknik mencari jawapan dalam petikan

5minggu

SEPTEMB

ER -

OKTOBER

1 9

9

1.Memberi penekanan berterusan dan latihan dalam mengenal

pasti kata kunci penting yang biasa diguna dalam soalan.

3minggu

oktober

Page 13: Rca bi

SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL

BIL NAMA MARKAH

1. Muhd Amir Hamzah Bin Osman 25

2. Nor Syafiqah Bt Mohd Sefeandi 21

3. Nor Shuhadah Bt Azizi 29

4. Siti Atiqah Bt Abd .Aziz 21

5. Mohd Syafiq Mohd Yusop 29

6. Siti Nor Hamizah Bt Razali 19

7. Shahrol Amir Bin Roslan 19

8. Hazril Abu Hassan 30

9. Mohd Nor Issam Bin Zainor 21

10. Nira Norfarizaaida Daud 19

11. Muhd Damsyik 12

12. Suhaida Bt Zaabarudin 16

13. Zulaily Shafina 12

14. Abdul Hakim Bin Jamil 13

Page 14: Rca bi

SENARAI PELAJAR GAGAL

BIL NAMA MARKAH

15. Mohd Zulfitri Abd Rashid 13

16. Shahrol Amirol Bin Roslan 8

17. 26

18. Mohd Nor Issam Zainor 10

19. Mohd Zulfitri Abd Rashid 13

20. Shahrol Amirol Bin Roslan 17

21. Muhd Muaiyim 14

22 Nik Mohd Mazrin Nik Mazli 14

23. Azizi Ariff Bin Ab.Hamid 12

24. Muhd Fazrul Izwan Mat Peddeli 10

25. Muhd Shafiq Bin Zolkifli 8

26. Muhd Hafiz Hashim 10

27. Siti Atiqah Aziz 21

Page 15: Rca bi

*

Page 16: Rca bi
Page 17: Rca bi
Page 18: Rca bi
Page 19: Rca bi

NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD

MATA PELAJARAN : ENGLISH 1119

TINGKATAN : FORM 5 SET 1

SUBJECT

Berasaskan RCA

UP 1

TOTAL

STUDENT

A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT

INTERVENSI

ENGLISH 23 1 1 6 5 4 4 1 1 0 6

PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 ss DID NOT GET AT LEAST A-

6 ss did not

get at least

A-

Weakness in writing complex sentences

Weakness in Subject Verb Agreement and using linkers Weakness in

generating ideas

Weakness in writing compound sentences

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMPAPER 1 DIRECTED WRITING & CONTINUOUS WRITING

Page 20: Rca bi

HEAD

COUNTPLAN

DO

(TIME

FRAME)

CHECK ACT

6

Sentence Building Practice

-Teach students how to write compound sentences and

complex sentences.

-Drilling students to write simple sentences and turn them into

compound and complex sentences.

-Drilling students to use expressions and idioms

Sept - Okt 4 2

2

Expose students to sentence patterns for directed writing

Drilling students on sample sentence patterns for directed

writing.

Drilling students to use linkers

Sept - Okt 2 0

0

Memorizing technique for continuous essay

Sept - Okt

Page 21: Rca bi

NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD

MATA PELAJARAN : English 1119

KELAS : FORM 5 SET 1

SUBJECT

Berasaskan

RCA

UP 1

TOTAL

STUDENT

A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT

INTERVENSI

ENGLISH

1119

23 1 1 6 5

1

4

1

4 1 1 0 6PROBLEM STATEMENT 6 ss DID NOT GET AT LEAST C+

6 students

did not get

at least C+

Inability to answer HOTS questions

Weakness in vocabularyWeakness in tenses

and SVA

Inability to remember facts on poems learnt

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMKERTAS 2 Rationale Cloze & Short Texts and Literature

Page 22: Rca bi

HEADCOUNTPLAN

DO

(TIME

FRAME)

CHECK ACT

6

• Drilling questions on grammar : SVA, tenses

• Intensive exercises on grammar work Sept - Okt 2 4

4 Memorizing techniques – poems Sept - Okt 2 2

2 Smart Novel – techniques in answering novel

questions

Sept - Okt

Page 23: Rca bi

NAMA GURU : YUSNIZA BT AHMAD

MATA PELAJARAN : ENGLISH 1119

TINGKATAN : FORM 5 SET 3

SUBJECT

Berasaskan

RCA

UP 2

TOTAL

STUDENT

A+ A A- B+ B C+ C D E G HEAD COUNT

INTERVENSI

ENGLISH 26 2 3 3 18 18

PROBLEM STATEMENT 18 STUDENTS FAIL

18 ss fail

Unable to lift details in summary

Weakness in understanding simple sentences Very weak in grammar

Unable to match questions with possible answers

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DIAGRAMPAPER 2 READING COMP & GRAPHIC MATERIALS

Page 24: Rca bi

HEAD

COUNTPLAN

DO

(TIME

FRAME)

CHECK ACT

18

1) Identify key words : WH questions

2) Drilling of questions for Sec A – Rationale Cloze

3) Identifying keywords for each questions

4 weeks

Sept - Okt

5 13

13 1) Drilling of lifting techniques for reading comprehension

2) Drilling of lifting techniques for summary

4 weeks

Sept - Okt 5 8

8 1) Drilling of lifting techniques for reading comprehension

2) Drilling of lifting techniques for summary

4 weeks

Okt

0

0

Page 25: Rca bi

*

*Fariz Muhd Husaini 25

*Mohd Hafiz Basar 29

*Muhd Nurfikri Jafri 29

*Kamasuriza M.Ariffin 32

*Nazratul Nadhirah 32

*Nor Hafizah 20

*Nur Aishah Zulkifli 33

*Nurul Syafieka 23

*Raja Muhd Syafiq 32

*Nur Liyana Md Rosni 34

*Nurul Shuhada 32

*Siti Natrah 32

*M.Arrisham 26

*M. Shazrin 33

*M. Fahmi 34

*M.Iqram 27

*M.Khairul Bhe 22

*M. Khairul Shahdan 28