réduction des coûts de main-d’oeuvre et d’intrants chimiques … · 2016. 12. 20. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Réduction des coûts de main-d’oeuvre et d’intrants
chimiques grâce à la mécanisation
Alberto Dorigoni, spécialiste en
physiologie des pommiers,
Centre de transfert technologique,
Fondation Edmund Mach, Italie
NARROW CANOPY
- Mechanical pruning
- Mechanical thinning
- Mech. weed control
- Less spraying volume
Light interception /
penetration
(no distinction between
inside and outside)
- Hand pruning
- Harvest
- No limb bending
AGRONOMIC
ADVANTAGES
ECOLOGICAL
ADVANTAGES (physical/mech. tools)
MANAGEMENT
ADVANTAGES
(Economic
sustainability)
Cultural practices improved by a narrow canopy
- Hand thinning
- Reduced drift
- Mech. harvest aids
- Faster leaf drying
- Tunnel sprayers
- Multi-task nets
- Solid Set Canopy
Delivery system
- Branch renewal
- Less growth regulators
2
Any kind of mechanization requires accurate trellys sytem and
vertically trained trees
Year 1-32860 spindle trees
(=2860 leaders)
2560 Bibaum trees
(=5120 leaders)
1850 3-axes trees
(=5550 leaders
1820 4-axes trees
(=7280 leaders
Tree spacing 3,5 x 1,0 m 3,25 x 1,2 3,0 x 1,8 m 2,75 x 2,0
N. of wires 4 5 5 4
Binding of leaders 95 213 231 243
Limb bending 105 0 0 0
Summer pruning 0 0 60 60
Total (3 years) 200 213 291 303
Adult trees2860 spindle trees
(=2860 leaders)
2560 Bibaum trees
(=5120 leaders)
1850 3-axes trees
(=5550 leaders
1820 4-axes trees
(=7280 leaders
Pruning 95 80 80 80
Hand thinning 140 110 90 80
Harvest (70 tons) 614 560 516 483
849 750 686 643
pre-formed trees completed in the field trees
Hand labour needed to fill the allotted space (year 1-3) and
to manage the trees when fully grown
-16%
-43%
-21%
-24%
3
Pruning pedestrian ML fruit walls of Gala compared to standard
Pedestrian (2.5 x 1.6 m)
Date Intervention hours/ha %
22/05/2015 mech. Pruning 3
22/05/2015 hand pruning 15
30/06/2015 hand pruning 12 68 summer
07/09/2015 mech. Pruning 3
07/09/2015 hand pruning 11
25/01/2016 hand pruning 21 32 winter
Total 65
Standard (3.5 x 1 m)
Date Intervention hours/ha
22/01/2016 hand pruning 85 100 winter
Total 85
Harvest hourly output with long and short pruning
S. Giusto farm - Friuli
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
kg
harv
este
d / h
ou
r
2005 long pruning 104 118 134
2008 conversion 113 113 125
2011 short pruning 125 150 148
August September October
4
Training systems and cultural practices
N.
leaders
Dist btw.
Rows (m)
1 3,50
2 3,25
3 3,00
4 2,75
6 2,50
8 2,25
12 2,00
Mech.
Thinning
Mech.
Pruning
"Summer"
pruning
AltCarpò/
thinning
nets
Mech.
weed
control
Harvest
aids
Shelters
for trees
D D D D D P D
P P D P P P D
P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P
I Impossible arrow points to better suitability
D Difficult
P Possible
N.
leaders
Dist btw.
Rows (m)
Anti-rain
nets
Tunnel
sprayers
Multi-task
fixed
spraying
Pedestrian
orchard
Precision
agriculture
Robotic
harvesting
Double
rows
1 3,50 I I I I I I I
2 3,25 D D I I D D I
3 3,00 D P D I D D I
4 2,75 P P D D D P D
6 2,50 P P P D D P D
8 2,25 P P P P P P P
12 2,00 P P P P P P P
Make use of mechanical pruning
to shape trees
5
Mechanical pruning in the ’60-80
M.P. was performed on vigorous apple and pear trees in winter
Result: excessive regrowth and poor fruit quality
A simplified version of the Lorette pruning at the end of Spring, at 10-
14 new leaves, can help in shaping a thin fruit wall.
6
Fuji mechanically pruned for 4 years (Friuli, 2011)
Fuji mechanically pruned for 4 years (Friuli, 2011)
7
WINDOW PRUNING MACHINE
Window pruning machine: Previously covered by PCT Patent Cooperation and confirmed in
EU, U.S.A. and Canada N. VI2012A000010 del 13.01.2013 as
“Apparato di cimatura per filari” of F. Mach
Cutting units
of 36 cm each
8
Flexibility of WPM
By changing over the years the height of the windows it is
possible to induce a cycle of new shoots
The number of cutting units can range from 1-2 (pre-
pruning) to 3-4 (almost full pruning).
The distance from the trunk of each cutting unit can range
from 10 to 50 cm
The proper setting for each orchard can be reached by
varying the angles of the outside and inside cutting bars.
WPM can effectively operate also in post-harvest.
By removing the inside cutting units WPM becomes a
traditional PM for summer pruning.
CUTS
REGROWTH
Regrowth of branches 2 years after WPM of a Gala branch
Flower buds
9
An apple 35mm
(1.4 inches)
diameter branch
cut by WPM
A 3 leader orchard well vertically trained and pruned by Window
Pruning Machine (November 2014, Mollerussa, Catalunya)
3 windows
10
Regrowth of a branch of Golden pruned by Window Pruning
Machine or by hand
By machine
(WPM)
By hand
The Window Pruning
Machine operates at
best only on well
vertically trained trees
“Windows”
11
The Window Pruning Machine at work in Belgium
Hand pruning time in winter (Golden Delicious)
Pruning type
hours/ha
2011
hours/ha
2012
hours/ha
2013
total
hours
% time
saved
Standard
Hand pruning85 78 75 238
WMP +
Hand pruning0 52 45 97 59%
Yield/tree (kg) Fruit weight (g)
Year 2012 2013 2012 2013
Hand pruning 17 b 20 a 294 a 230 c
Fruit wall 18 b 12 b 270 ab 265 a
WPM 25 a 18 a 252 b 244 ab
Yield of Golden Delicious with different pruning systems
12
Gala WPM in post-harvest (September 2013)
unpruned WM pruned
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
manual 87 76 78 77 74
WPM + manual 87 82 86 82 80
bb b
b
aa
aa
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Fru
it o
verc
olo
ur
(%)
Fruit overcolour of Gala pruned manually alone or by WPM + manually
13
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
manual 53 70 39 41 90
WPM + manual 61 73 37 56 93
b
b
a
a
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
To
ns
/ h
aYield of Gala pruned manually alone or by WPM and
manually
MECHANICAL THINNING OF
FLOWERS
14
Any kind of thinning (ch., mech, man.) is difficult when trees
have complex secondary structure like in «taille long»
Excessive fruit set of untreated Gala
15
Ideal branches for mechanical thinning with Darwin
60 cm
Mechanical thinning efficacy depends on tree training
A few clusters after mechanical thinning (6 km/h, 250 rpm)
16
•More consistent over the years;
•“Quantitative”: efficacy can be increased by changing rpm;
• Visibile: most of the effect can be seen, allowing corrections;
• Indipendent from meteo, cultivar (and species), but also from
PGR’s availability and from the market;
• Cheap, easy and fast to learn;
• Integrated if needed with chemicals (BA e NAA);
Advantages of mechanical thinnning versus chemical
Sustainabile environmentally and economically
Gala bi-axes (2415 trees/ha - val d'Adige 2009)
c
a
a
a
b
bab
b
a
bb
c
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
UNTREATED 87 34 309 109
MEC. TH.. 220rpm, 6 km/h 39 27 168 164
MEC. TH. 220rpm -> NAA+BA 34 22 116 198
fruit set (%) kg/tree N. fruits Fruit weight (g)
optimal crop load
P<0.001
P=0.007
P<0.001
P<0.001
adequate size
Thinning trial on Gala in Adige valley (2009)
17
UNTREATED MECH. THINN. 220 rpm
Gala trained bi-axes 2009 improve Darwin performance (V. Adige)
Return bloom of Fuji
Val di Non, Spring 2009return bloom index:
1=no flower clusters;
9=only flower clusters on >2 year old wood
D
B
C
A
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
Untreated 2xATS->NAA+BA Mec. Thin 280 rpm Mec. Th. 280 rpm ->
NAA+BA
retu
rn b
loo
m i
nd
ex
P<0.01
18
IASMA trials 2009: efficacy of mechanical/integrated thinning*
*Efficacy and increase in weight are both related to UTC as %
Note: Darwin with old set of brush
Cv / Location
Targeted
thinning
efficacy
Thinning
efficacy
mechanic
Thinning
efficacy
mech.+ chem.
increase in
fruit size
mechanic
increase in fruit
size mech. +
chem.
Fuji / v. Adige 57 45 58 39 55
Golden / v. Adige 44 55 73 36 52
Gala / v. Adige 51 46 62 50 82
Red / v. Adige 34 34 45 34 47
Pink Lady / v. Adige 48 37 62 14 38
Braeburn / v. Adige 31 26 --- 14 ---
Fuji / v. Non 53 61 71 89 124
Golden / v. Non 64 52 65 63 105
Average 48 45 62 42 72
optimal thinning
sligtht overthinning
overthinning
Legenda:
Trials with mechanical + chemical thinning 2010-2011 of Iasma
Light thinning
Optimal thinnig
Overthinning
Trials 2011
Cv / Location
Targeted
thinning
efficacy
Thinning
efficacy
mechanic
Thinning
efficacy
mech.+ BA
Increase in
fruit size
mechanic
Increase in
fruit size
mech. + BA
Fuji / v. Adige 59 21 31 18 28
Golden / v. Adige 40 28 34 19 27
Gala / v. Adige 52 15 29 9 24
Red / v. Adige 37 26 23 18 18
Fuji / v. Non 66 48 53 59 64
Golden / v. Non 53 21 48 32 73
Average 51 27 36 26 39
Trials 2010
Cv / Location
Targeted
thinning
efficacy
Thinning
efficacy
mechanic
Thinning
efficacy
mech.+ BA
Increase in
fruit size
mechanic
Increase in
fruit size
mech. + BA
Fuji / v. Adige 56 22 52 18 66
Golden / v. Adige 51 27 49 26 58
Gala / v. Adige 54 44 53 34 39
Red / v. Adige 46 30 29 6 28
Pink Lady / v. Adige 49 42 43 21 31
Modì 48 67 70 49 55
Fuji / v. Non 57 31 38 34 32
Golden / v. Non 47 39 36 33 30
Average 51 38 46 28 42
Note: Darwin with new set of brush
19
The drawbacks of mechanical thinning
• Risk of late frost (with aggressive rpm)
• Need for slender trees and suitable branches
• Not selective in terms of king flower
• Some damage on spur leaves and some shock on the whole tree
• Despite the early timing (bloom) and 15 years of observation without
a single case in Europe, some concern remains of fire blight
transmission in infected areas
• Psycological barrier for many growers/technicians
TUNNEL SPRAYING with and without nets reduce drift and save
30-40% of chemicals
20
MULTI-TASK SINGLE ROW NETS
The potential of nets is wide:
• Protection against hail, some insects (codling moth, stink
bug, etc.), birds, sunburn
• Thinning by early closure in bloom
• Reducing drift and facilitate mist fixed spraying
• Helping release of beneficial insects
• Controlling microcimate (anti-rain nets)
Multi-task single-row nets
Single-row nets require slender
canopies and short trees
21
The fruit wall is suitable to both tunnel sprayers and MT nets
Nets try to find a compromise between these 2 opposite goals:
•foster pollination by bees to have good yield and quality
• thin excessive crop by PGR’s
King flowers are free to be pollinised, while side flowers and
secondary blooming are at least in part excluded.
Shading by net also indirectely affects fruit set, causing
starvation of weaker fruitlets
Crop load control and MT nets
22
Azienda Coccinella in val di Chiana (Arezzo, IT) under MT nets
MT nets in an organic farm (Maso Ertis, Oscar Ioris - Povo, 2012)
23
Net closure at pink bud Net closure 5 days later
Thinning organic (2012)
Net closure at pink bud stage (Fuji, 28/3/2012)
24
Net closure at 18% open flowers Fuji (2/4/2012)
Untreated
Fuji (27/9/12)Net at 18% O.F.
25
Fruit set of Fuji thinned by means of nets or chemicals
C
BC
BBBB
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
n. fr
uit
s / 1
00 c
luste
rs
Fruit set 101 31 22 35 38 35 38
Untreated Pink bud net 8% O.F. net 18% O.F. net 48% O.F. net 71% O.F. 3XATS->BA
Trials 2012
Fruit production of Fuji thinned by M.P. nets (2012)
C
BCBC BC
BC
B
A
B
AB
AAA
AB
A
D
C
B B B
A
A
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Untreated net P.B. net 8%
O.F.
net 18%
O.F.
net 48%
O.F.
net 71%
O.F.
ATS - BA
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5N. fruits
Fruit weight
n. of seeds/apple
Optimum N. fruits
26
Prova di diradamento con mezzi chimici, fisici e meccanici
(Golden Delicious, val d'Adige 2013)
B
A
A
A
C
B
A
B
B
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Testimone 98 288 134
BA+NAA 67 157 215
rete chiusa al 20% F.A. 58 210 193
Allegagione (%) N. frutti Peso frutto (g)
P<0.01P<0.01
P<0.01
Diradamento di Red Delicious con mezzi fisici e meccanici
(val d'Adige 2013)
C
A
A
B
B
B
A
CC
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Testimone 84 148 194
Diradamento meccanico 230 rpm 41 70 275
rete 20% F.A. 21 22 360
allegagione % N. Frutti Peso frutto (g)
P<0,0001 P<0,0001P<0,0001
P<0,0001
Overthinning on Red Delicious
27
Untr. Pink bud 8% O.F 38% O.F. 76% O.F. NAD
Seeds in apples thinned by MT nets
Natural fruit set of unthinned Fuji 5/6/14
28
Fruit set of Fuji under MT nets 5/6/14
Thinning of Fuji by means of multi-tasking nets (V. Adige)
Uncovered 2013Net at 20% O.F. 2013
Net at 20% O.F. 2014
29
Thinning Fuji by net (4/27/15) – Maso Parti
Pedestrian Fuji thinned
by MT nets
30
Multi-leader fruit wall of Fuji in 2014 thinned
only by AltCArpò net (79.9 tons/ha - Avg Fruit weight: 255 g)
4 and 6 leader Golden Delicious thinned only by AltCArpò net
2.7 m
53kg/tree x 1650 trees/ha=87 tons/ha
31
Ritorno a fiore di Fuji 2014-2015
B
A A
A
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
10,0
1=
sen
za f
iori
, 9=
so
lo f
iori
I_fioritura 7,4 7,3 8,6 2,7
Altcarpò AP doppia Rete fina Scoperto
The protection against hail
32
2 hours after hail without net (24/6/14)
2 hours after hail under net (24/6/14)
33
Standard AltCarpòAnti-rain net
Fine AltCarpò
2.5 m
long
standard
AltCarpò
1.1 m wide anti-rain net
34
Pioggia raccolta in primavera nei pluviometri a centro fila (2014)
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
8/4 19/4 22/4 28/4 30/4 12/5 .
mm
AltCarpò
Anti-pioggia doppia
Anti-pioggia singola
scoperto
Untreated Fuji with 100% scab infection on shoots and 15% on
fruits (2016)
35
2 and 4 leader
Golden under anti-
rain nets without
spraying fungicides
Untreated Golden D. apples
Control not covered
(99% scab)
Covered by anti-rain net
(3% scab)
2015
36
Controlling microclimate (anti-rain nets) 2016
No fungicides No fungicides + A-R net
Wholly aphid is the
main problem under
anti-rain nets for some
cultivars like Fuji
37
FIXED SPRAYING on trellys under the nets opens up new
possibilities (timely spraying, m.o., organic compounds, etc.)
FIXED SPRAYING on trellys under the nets
38
Double Guyot under Whailex nets
Nets can be lifted on just one side to perform coltural practices
39
Pedestrian Golden with 70 tons/ha under anti-rain net (2015)
2 leader Golden after 25 cm of wet haevy snowfall (7/3/16)
AltCarpò Anti-rain
40
Thank you for your attention!