re-inventing reference acrl 2011 a declaration of interdependence philadelphia, pa ~ april 1, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Re-Inventing Reference
ACRL 2011A Declaration of Interdependence
Philadelphia, PA ~ April 1, 2011
Challenges = opportunity
• Competing priorities for librarians’ time
• Planning of new library building • Shifting Reference environment
– Downward trend in usage of print collection
– Changing education of librarians– Informative statistics
Competing priorities
• New responsibilities for liaison librarians– Instruction – Outreach– Scholarly communications
Reference @ GVSU: Then
• Three locations with different environments, patrons, and staffing
• Hybrid staffing—Reference Desk Assistant (RDA) program
• Informative statistics (LibStats) beginning Fall 2008– Number of questions– Type of questions
Process
• Review of overall library services and trends
• Analysis of LibStats evidence• Examination of print reference
collection usage• Shift in attitudes toward reference
Review of services and trends
• Review of trends and literature• Vision of blended services and
single- service point to better serve patrons
• Our conclusions/vision
Analysis of LibStats evidence
• Reference Effort Assessment Data (READ) Scale from Dominican University http://www.dom.edu/library/READ/index.html
• Modified four-point READ scale:– 1-directional, technical, policy (student
worker)– 2-ready reference (paraprofessional)– 3-reference (may require librarian)– 4-request for citation information
Analysis of LibStats: Reference Desk
Fall 2008-Winter 2009
- Using modified READ scale– 11,330 questions reviewed– 377 required a librarian– 95% could be answered by
paraprofessional or student
Molaro, A. & Woods, L. (2009) Report of LibStats analysis. GVSU University Libraries.
Analysis of LibStats: Chat
• Fall 2008-Summer 2009– Modified READ scale– 1039 chats – 23.1% required librarian response
Bravender, P., Lyon, C., & Molaro, A. (2009 November). Analysis of Chat Reference: To Chat, or Not to Chat: That is the Question. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Michigan Library Association, Lansing, MI.
Analysis: Print reference collection usage
Winter 2009 LibStats• 4407 questions• 249 related to a Reference source
– 51 involved online source– 70 librarian referred patron to print source– 172 questions student requested a source– 46% (approx.) questions referred to
dictionaries, citation questions, or assignment-related sources
Way, D., & Lyon, C. (2009, November). Good Enough: The new face of reference. Presentation at the Charleston Conference, Charleston, SC.
Print reference collection
• Re-evaluating– Based on Millennium stats for usage of print
reference collection– LibStats review
• Re-locating– Single volume encyclopedias, handbooks,
and dictionaries– Biographical works– Dated multivolume sets with some value– Previous editions (keep latest in Reference)– Standard works in subscription services, e.g.
Current Biography
Changing attitudes
• Increased reliance on RDA staffing• Changes in Reference Education
(“What’s your favorite Reference book?” discussion was telling.)
• “Is Print Reference Dead?” Polanka, S. (2008, January 29) Gale online
session .
RDA training
• Shift in training philosophy– From quick referral to librarians
to teaching more in depth reference skills
• Provide deeper awareness and knowledge of resources
• Provide support to build confidence in answering questions
Reference @ GVSU: Now
• One desk at Zumberge Library• Staffed by full-time support staff
and students• Librarians available for callout via
Wimba Pronto• Other locations in flux due to local
environmental factors
ANSWER: Single-service point
• Currently @ Zumberge Library
• New building
Now what?
• Building relationships with other departments in library
• Dealing with loss of traditional librarian role
• Investigating reasons for decline in the number of reference transactions
References
• Allegri, F. & Bedard, M. (2006). Lessons learned from single service point implementations. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 25(2), 3147.
• Arndt, T. S. (2010). Reference service without the desk. Reference Services Review, 38(1), 71-80.
• McDermott, M. (2001). Staffing the reference desk: Improving service through cross-training and other programs. Legal Services Quarterly, 19(1/2), 207-219.
• Moore, M.E., McGraw, K.A., & Shaw-Kokot, J. (2001). Preparing staff to work at a single service desk. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 20(1), 79-86.
• Naismith, R. (2004). Combining circulation and reference functions at one desk. Journal of Access Services, 2(3), 15-20.
• Powell, J., Bryan, L., Michelson-Thiery, M., Koltay, Z., & Patterson, M. (2007). Integrating an engineering library's public service desk: Multiple perspectives. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 49(Winter).
Questions?