re-operative anti-reflux surgery: when and how? lee l. swanstrom, md division of minimally invasive...
TRANSCRIPT
Re-operative anti-reflux surgery: When and How?
Lee L. Swanstrom, MDDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Legacy Health System
Dept of Surgery, OR Health Sciences University
Results: Laparoscopic Nissen - Results: Laparoscopic Nissen - 10/91 to 9/9910/91 to 9/99
• 644 primary Nissens for GERD
• age = 52 (14 - 87)• 64% males• OR time 136 min (52 - 235)• LOS 1.6 days (0 - 17)• Mortality = 0• Complications 11%
• 599 good to excellent results (93%)
• early failure = 12 (2%)• reoperation = 32 (5%)• on medication = 103
(16%)• 241 with objective f/u:
– 38 (16%) had evidence of continued reflux
Swanstrom, Jobe; Surgical Endosc; 1999
What is a failed fundoplication?
• Continued use of peptic medication?• Heartburn/Reflux?• Side effects related to surgery?
– Dysphagia– Gasbloat– Nausea/diarrhea
• Objective test results?– 24 hr pH– EGD/UGI– manometry
Failure
• Residual or recurrent symptoms
• Wrap herniation or disruption
• Abnormal 24 hr. pH
• Non-dilatable dysphagia (worse than before)
• Do symptoms mean there is reflux?– 2/3 of patients c/o post op GERD sx have
normal 24 hr pH– 9% of patients with no symptoms have a pos.
24 hr pH.
Khajanchee YS, “Postoperative Symptoms and failure following antireflux surgery” Arch Surg, 2002. 137(9):1008-14.
Risk of recurrence
• Type V (recurrent, postoperative)
• Type IV (giant, multivisceral)• Type III (combined)• Type I (sliding)• Type II (rolling)
– Fundus herniated into mediastinum
– GE junction in normal position
Low
High
Modes of Failure After ARSModes of Failure After ARS
• h
Gastric retraction without adequate esophageal length
GEJ retracted below diaphragm under tension
GEJ retracted below diaphragm under tension
Malpositioning of the fundoplication
“Patients with substantial psychological overlay cannot be
expected to do as well with standard therapy…”
• Avoid the crazed, bulemic, voluntary wretching, aerophagic patients…
Mechanical problems:
• failures are due to:–wrap herniation*–wrap disruption*–malpositioned wrap–reflux through intact wrap
*mostly as a result of a repair under tension
Reasons for failure
Repairs under tension!Repairs under tension!
• Torsion = divide the short gastricsTorsion = divide the short gastrics
• Wrap = loose fundoplicationWrap = loose fundoplication
• Axial = beware the short esophagus!Axial = beware the short esophagus!
Who should be considered for another antireflux surgery?
• Patients with daily symptoms (heartburn/dysphagia) requiring chronic medical treatment
• patients who have complications from GERD coming back
• Patients with objective confirmation of failure• Patients with a defined mechanical or
physiologic reason for failure
An extensive preoperative evaluation is critical for the difficult patient• Complete medical evaluation• Comprehensive esophageal physiology testing
– UGI– endoscopy– motility testing– 24 hr pH test– gastric emptying study
• Don’t hesitate to say “No”
Motility for:• esophageal length•Esophageal function•LES function
pH for:•Reflux?•Correlation without•Symptom correlation
Shortened esophagus on preop imaging
Laparoscopic approach
Standard dissection to achieve 2 cm of intraabdominal length
Extensive Type II Fundoplication
dissection (Nissen)
No Almost Yes
Collis gastroplasty Hill procedure
no yes
Progressive failure
01234
initialsurgery
2ndsurgery
3rdsurg
4th surg
Visick scoreVisick score
***
***
* 209 patients** 82 patients*** 21 patients
Problem prevention:• Careful attention to patient symptoms and
complaints• A thorough and complete evaluation
– EGD– Motility– 24 hr pH– Gastric emptying– Bernstein– Bilitek– Impedance testing
• No hesitation to say “no”!
On all patients
Reoperative ARS
• Know ahead of time what went wrong• Tell the patient the bad news• Prep for a Collis• Have a flexible endoscope in the room• sharp, precise dissection• Completely take down the old repair• Check for leaks• Be patient