read (2010) a model for scaffolding writing instruction

Upload: catherinekexin

Post on 04-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    1/7

    S

    T

    EACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEAC

    HINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    The Reading Teacher, 64(1), pp. 4752 2010 International Reading AssociationDOI:10.1598/RT.64.1.5 ISSN: 0034-0561 print / 1936-2714 online

    A Model for Scaffolding WritingInstruction: IMSCI

    Sylvia Read

    If you were asked to write an insurance adjustors

    report following a car accident, could you do it?

    How about a legal brief on the subject of interna-

    tional adoption? Setting aside the fact that you would

    need to research the topic of international adoption,

    are you familiar with the legal brief genre? You

    may not know what sort of content is expected in a

    legal brief nor what form it should take. However, of-

    ten students are asked to write about topics they donot know much about and to write in a format with

    which they are not familiar.

    Just as we know that readers bring their prior

    knowledge with them when they read and construct

    meaning, writers also need to bring prior knowl-

    edge to the act of composing meaning through writ-

    ing. Often, though, teachers ask students to write in

    genres or modes of composition without building

    their prior knowledge of these types of texts.

    Genres of writing do not develop in a vacuum;

    they are socially constructed to suit the particular

    purposes of the writer and the particular needs of an

    audience (Martin & Rothery, 1986). Teaching writing

    through genres can help students understand and

    respond to the expectations of writing situations.

    This process demonstrates how and why texts are

    structured in certain ways (Hyland, 2004) and helps

    students to understand how those structures work to

    support the readers understanding of texts. When

    students are aware of the features of a genre, they

    are better able to organize texts, they understand

    the communicative purpose of a genre, and they be-

    come more aware of a readers expectations of a text(Swami, 2008).

    Teaching writing through a focus on genre also

    allows us to support students as they gain familiar-

    ity with the expectations and conventions of a genre.

    Using a social approach to learning, the teacher can

    assist learners to compose texts that they could not

    compose independently. Teachers support students

    as apprentices in writing through modeling and joint

    production of texts. Social learning theory (Bandura,

    1977; Vygotsky, 1978) suggests that students learn

    best when learning is situated in a context in which

    they interact with each other and the teacher in

    meaningful, purposeful ways.

    BackgroundGenre study has been a popular method for organiz-ing the writing curriculum in Australia, where educa-

    tors became concerned that students were not being

    taught a range of text types and that factual writing

    (Martin, 1989) was being neglected. The instruction-

    al framework that developed to address this concern

    began with a modeling phase, followed by a joint

    negotiation phase, and ended with independent con-

    struction of a text type.

    Genre study does not have to be rigid and for-

    mal in its approach. Rankers (2009) case study of a

    first-grade classroom showed how explicit, or overt,instruction can be effectively integrated in situated

    practice. Genres can be explored through an inquiry

    approach where many examples of a genre are ex-

    amined, and teachers and students together analyze

    their features to construct a definition that is acces-

    sible to students. Once students have experienced ex-

    amples of the genre, the teacher can model writing

    that genre and engage students in shared writing of

    the genre. Then students will more likely be ready

    to write independently. If the same genre is encoun-

    tered again, less scaffolding will be necessary, but ifa new genre is introduced, then the sequence can be

    repeated (Gibbons, 2002).

    Based on social learning theory and genre study,

    I developed the IMSCI model (described in the next

    section) for organizing and scaffolding writing in-

    struction that sequences instruction in such a way

    that teachers can model both product (the genre of

    focus) and process.

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    2/7

    HINGTIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGTIP

    S

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    T

    TIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACH

    INGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    48 The Reading Teacher Vol. 64, No. 1 September 2010

    successful writing independently if they have be-

    come familiar with the features of the genre during

    an inquiry phase, seen the teacher model the genre,

    and participated in writing in that genre through

    shared or collaborative writing.

    In the ClassroomAfter I presented this model to teachers at a local el-

    ementary school, two of the teachers decided that the

    approach was worth testing out in their classrooms.

    Specifically, Mrs. Bagley and Mrs. Olsen wanted to

    teach their fourth graders to write historical fiction.

    The teachers and I discussed picture books that would

    be useful in the inquiry phase, and then they read

    aloud to their students a variety of books including

    Baseball Saved Usby Ken Mochizuki,Rose Blanche

    by Roberto Innocenti,Sarah, Plain and Tallby Patricia

    MacLachlan, andA Year Down Yonderby RichardPeck. As they read these books, they discussed the

    characteristics of them with the students. The students

    noticed that many of the books were written in first

    person from one characters point of view, but that the

    books were set in the past and that some of the events

    or people were grounded in historical fact.

    To build background knowledge about local

    history, the students took a walking tour of the his-

    toric sites of the town. At each location on the tour,

    the teachers told stories of historical events that oc-

    curred there. Students took notes on a graphic orga-nizer (see Figure 1). When they returned to school,

    the teachers provided the students with a booklet

    that included photos of the locations and summaries

    of the stories that went with each location.

    The next step was to model for the students the

    prewriting phase of the writing process. The model-

    ing was done with an overhead projector so that the

    students could observe and par ticipate. The shared

    writing element of the IMSCI model was included in

    this step as well. Students want to participate, and the

    teachers found that the students were more engaged

    when they were allowed to make suggest ions thatthe teachers incorporated into their prewriting plans.

    Mrs. Bagleys prewriting is shown in Figure 2.

    The prewriting organizer was designed to help

    students integrate the history they learned into a fic-

    tional plot. Iran decided to use the courthouse story

    as the basis for his historical fiction. Irans prewriting

    is shown in Figure 3. As often happens with historical

    fiction, some details are invented to suit the purposes

    IMSCI as a Model forScaffolding Writing InstructionIMSCI is an acronym for a series of steps, based on

    the concept of scaffolding.Istands for inquiry. As a

    classroom teacher in the first and second grades, I

    integrated reading and writing instruction. Duringread-aloud, I focused on a particular genre for a

    week or two and engaged my students in an inquiry

    into the features of that genre. I followed up this in-

    quiry into a genre with writing instruction focused

    on that genre.

    TheMin IMSCI stands for modeling. After devel-

    oping their understanding of texts that fit into the

    target genre, I modeled for my students how to write

    a text in that genre. I modeled how to brainstorm top-

    ics, prewrite using graphic organizers, draft, revise,

    and edit. The modeling was applied to every phase

    of the writing process so that students could see (andhear me think aloud about) how to accomplish the

    task at hand.

    Modeling was followed (or sometimes replaced)

    bysharedwr itingtheSin the IMSCI model. In ad-

    dition to modeling, the students and I cowrote a text

    in the target genre. When my students participated

    in the writing, they engaged in making decisions

    about topic, sentence structure, organization, and

    the likeall the decisions they will make when they

    write independently.

    The Cin IMSCI stands for collaborativewriting.As I gradually released responsibility to my students,

    an interim step between modeled or shared writing

    and independent writing is collaborative writing

    where two students work together to produce writ-

    ing. Sometimes they produced one text, with each

    student taking turns being scribe; other times my stu-

    dents wrote parallel texts that were similar but not

    the same. Decisions about this must be driven by

    your students personalities and abilities and your in-

    structional goals. Collaborative writing is especially

    helpful for English-language learners, who benefit

    from oral rehearsal of ideas and sentences beforecomposing (Gibbons, 2002).

    Independentwriting is the finalI in IMSCI. I gradu-

    ally released responsibility to my first and second

    graders; due to the previous scaffolding, they were

    ready to write independently. When teachers merely

    assign writing topics without teaching, they are es-

    sentially throwing non-swimmers into the pool and

    shouting Swim! from poolside. Students are more

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    3/7

    S

    T

    EACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEAC

    HINGT

    IPS

    TEACH

    INGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    A Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction: IMSCI

    of the story. In Irans story, he decided that the mur-

    derer should escape rather than be hung.

    Before students began writing the first draft of

    their historical fiction piece, Mrs. Bagley also mod-

    eled drafting (see Figure 4). While modeling her

    rough draft, she integrated a minilesson on charac-

    ter development that focused on showing characters

    in action and providing physical description of the

    characters. Mrs. Bagley underlined action verbs,

    such as brushed off and stepped out. She also un-

    derlined examples of physical description, such as

    freshly ironed suit. The students spent several days

    drafting their stories, and Mrs. Bagley conferenced

    with students. During her conferencing she decided

    she needed to teach two more minilessons: She mod-eled how to use dialogue to show character develop-

    ment and how to add a description of the setting. As

    part of these lessons, Mrs. Bagley showed them how

    to use sticky notes as a strategy for adding text to a

    rough draft.

    The students met in peer revision groups to read

    their stories and get feedback. They made revisions

    in the margins, in the spaces between lines, and on

    Figure 1Historic Main Street Graphic Organizer

    Figure 2Mrs. Bagleys Prewriting

    Figure 3Irans Prewriting

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    4/7

    HINGTIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGTIP

    S

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    T

    TIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACH

    INGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    50 The Reading Teacher Vol. 64, No. 1 September 2010

    sticky notes (see Figure 5). The final stage of the writ-

    ing process was also modeled by the teacher with stu-

    dent participation. The students used an editing kit,

    with colored pens and an editing checklist to guide

    their work (see Figure 6). They used the editing kit

    with a par tner and then worked with an adult. They

    recopied their final draft on special paper. Figure 7shows the first page of Anas final draft.

    Figure 4Mrs. Bagleys Model of Rough Draft

    Figure 5Irans Rough Draft, Showing Additions and Editing

    Figure 6Editing Checklist

    Figure 7Anas Final Draft, Page 1

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    5/7

    S

    T

    EACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEAC

    HINGT

    IPS

    TEACH

    INGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    E A C H I N G

    T I P S

    T

    A Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction: IMSCI

    or with them as a shared writing task. Then, each

    step in the process was completed with a partner or

    alone.

    We repeated this set of steps with memoir, non-

    fiction, and persuasive writing. Each time, we began

    with an inquiry phase where we examined exem-

    plars of the genre and discussed their features beforeI began modeling. The writing process was modeled,

    keeping true to its recursive nature. Prewriting led to

    drafting, and drafting led to revising, but I returned

    to our prewriting or to drafting when the need arose.

    Modeling was always followed by or occurred

    simultaneously with shared writing. Having students

    participate keeps them engaged, but modeling ac-

    companied by think-aloud helps them to see that the

    teacher, too, struggles with word choice, syntax, and

    the like. The words dont just appearshazam!on

    the page. And rough drafts are rough!Collaborative writing or independent writing al-

    ways follows. Collaboration can precede indepen-

    dent writing for struggling writers, offering them a

    sheltered context in which to try out their new un-

    derstanding of how writing happens. Publication

    can be achieved through a variety of means from the

    simpleststudents reading aloud their work at

    Application of IMSCIWith Any Genre, Any GradeThe IMSCI model can be used to guide the teaching

    of any genre in almost any grade level. For example,

    I used the IMSCI model to teach poetry writing with

    a group of inservice teachers. For the inquiry phase,I read aloud examples of free verse poetry. We dis-

    cussed what these poems had in common and wrote

    our own definition of poetry. I then modeled for them

    a way to generate topics for poetry using a listing ap-

    proach. The teachers contributed to this list as well,

    which meant that this phase included both modeling

    and shared writing (both of which should occur for

    prewriting, as well as drafting and revising). Then,

    as a group, we decided on a topic we could all re-

    late to and wrote a very rough draft of a poem us-

    ing a shared writing approach. The teachers offered

    up phrases and words, and I served both as scr ibeand coauthor of the poem, providing my opinions on

    how to shape the poem. The teachers theneither

    working with a partner or alonechose a topic and

    drafted their own free verse poem.

    We worked to revise our group-authored poem

    before I asked them to revise their own poems. Each

    step in the process was modeled either by me alone

    Take ACTION!Begin by identifying a genre, mode,

    or form of writing that would benefit

    your students. For example, if your

    students are engaging in science

    inquiry and need to keep a science

    notebook, that would be an ideal

    form of writing to focus on.

    1.Gather examples of thegenre, mode, or form of writing.

    For example, there are student-generated examples of science

    notebook entries at www.science

    notebooks.org. Other useful

    books for showing students what

    science notebooks look like are

    Neo Leo: The Ageless Ideas of

    Leonardo Da Vinciwritten and

    illustrated by Gene Barretta and

    Leonardos Machine: Da Vincis

    Inventions Revealedby Domenico

    Laurenza and Mario Taddei.

    2.Engage students in an inquiryabout the genre, mode, or form

    of writing of focus. Ask students

    to notice features of the writing in

    question. What kind of language

    is used? What organizational

    features are present? What doesthe writing look like on the page?

    What topics are covered?

    3.Model for students how to writein the genre, mode, or form. Actively

    modeling and thinking aloud in

    front of students allows them to

    understand the complexity of the

    writing process. Also, writing in draft

    mode allows students to see that

    spelling and punctuation are not as

    important as getting ideas down.

    4.From modeling, segue intoshared writing, during which

    students make suggestions for what

    to write next and how to compose

    phrases and sentences. This keeps

    them engaged and brings them into

    the process so that they can more

    easily imagine themselves writing.

    5.Allow students to writecollaboratively.

    6.Encourage students to writeindependently in the genre,

    mode, or form. Continue to

    provide support as needed.

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    6/7

    HINGTIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGTIP

    S

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    TEACHINGTIPS

    T

    TIPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TE

    ACHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    CHINGT

    IPS

    TEA

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACHINGT

    IPS

    TEACH

    INGT

    IPS

    TEACHI

    52 The Reading Teacher Vol. 64, No. 1 September 2010

    various stages of progressto more elaborate typing

    and displaying student work.

    Supporting Genre WritingThrough inquiry, we can build students background

    knowledge of genres. Then, through modeling,shared writing, and collaborative writing, we support

    students as they approximate the expectations and

    conventions of the chosen genre. By following the

    instructional model described here, we make our ex-

    pectations more explicit and overt, which increases

    the likelihood that students will feel successful as

    writers of many genres.

    ReferencesBandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

    Prentice-Hall.

    Gibbons, P. (2002).Scaf folding language, scaffolding learning:Teaching second language learners in the mainstream class-

    room. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writers. Ann

    Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Martin, J.R. (1989).Factual writing: Exploring and challenging so-

    cial reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Martin, J.R., & Rothery, J. (1986). What a functional approach to

    the writing task can show teachers about good writing. In

    B. Couture (Ed.),Functional approaches to writing: Research

    perspectives(pp. 241265). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Ranker, J. (2009). Learning nonfiction in an ESL class: The inter-

    action of situated practice and teacher scaffolding in a genre

    study. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 580 589. doi:10.1598/

    RT.62.7.4

    Swami, J.A. (2008). Sensitizing ESL learners to genre. TESL-EJ,12(3), 113.

    Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher

    psychological processes(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner,

    & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Har vard

    University Press.

    Read teaches at Utah State University, Logan,

    USA; e-mail [email protected].

    MORE TO EXPLORE

    ReadWriteThink.org Lesson Plan How-To Writing: Motivating Students to Write

    for a Real Purpose by Lisa Leliaert

    IRA Books Helping Children Become Readers ThroughWriting: A Guide to Writing Workshop inKindergartenby Arlene C. Schulze

    Marvelous Minilessons for Teaching BeginningWriting, K3by Lori Jamison Rog

    IRA Journal Articles An Effective Framework for Primary-GradeGuided Writing Instruction by Sharan A.Gibson, The Reading Teacher, December 2008

    Scaffolding Students Comprehension ofText by Kathleen F. Clark and Michael F.Graves, The Reading Teacher, March 2005

  • 8/13/2019 Read (2010) a Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction

    7/7

    Reproducedwithpermissionof thecopyrightowner. Further reproductionprohibitedwithoutpermission.