reasonable enforcement of deed restrictions - dallas … · · 2017-07-146 one purpose of deed...
TRANSCRIPT
Marc D. MarkelMarc D. Markel Roberts Markel P.C.Roberts Markel P.C. Attorneys and Counselors at LawAttorneys and Counselors at Law
Houston Houston ♦♦
Dallas Dallas ♦♦
San Antonio San Antonio ♦♦
Sugar Land Sugar Land ♦♦
BeaumontBeaumont
Dallas Bar AssociationDallas Bar Association Real Estate SectionReal Estate Section
Reasonable Enforcement of Deed Reasonable Enforcement of Deed RestrictionsRestrictionsSeptember 13, 2010September 13, 2010
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
2
Presentation GoalsPresentation Goals
What does it mean to be reasonable?
Understanding the authority of the association
Knowing when an association should take action
Knowing when an association should not take action
What is permissible action
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
3
Prevalence of Community Associations
– One out of eight new communities across the country
– Estimates are that there are over 300,000 mandatory community associations in existence
– It is estimated that 25-30,000 of them are in Texas
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
4
A man’s house is his castle
Creating & Enforcing Governing DocumentsCreating & Enforcing Governing Documents
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
5
Regulation of land use
– No one should tell a person what they can do on their own property
– But to preserve their property values they should be able to regulate what their neighbors are permitted and prohibited to do
– Thus the inherent conflict– And the birth of restrictive covenants and
the community association to administer the plan
Creating & Enforcing Governing DocumentsCreating & Enforcing Governing Documents
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
6
One purpose of deed restrictions is to protect property values. Violations of deed restrictions most directly affect the value of adjoining lots. Cox v. Melson-Fulsom, 956 S.W. 2nd 791, (Tex App. Austin 1997, no writ).
Creating & Enforcing Governing DocumentsCreating & Enforcing Governing Documents
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
7
An Owner burdens his own land with restrictions because of the fact that a like burden will be imposed on his neighbor’s lot and this will be beneficial to both lots. Curlee v. Walker, 244 S.W. 2 497, (Tex 1922).
Creating & Enforcing Governing DocumentsCreating & Enforcing Governing Documents
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
8
Sets Standards for the Community
Critical in importance without zoning
Necessary to maintain/improve property values in addition to zoning
Maintains Curb Appeal
Enhances and Maintains Property Values
Sets Guidelines for Communal Living
Why Have Deed Restrictions?Why Have Deed Restrictions?
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
9
Texas Uniform Condominium Act
Sec. 82.055. Contents of Declaration for all condominiums. The declaration for a condominium must contain:………
(9) any restrictions on use, occupancy, or alienation of the units
Origin of Deed Restrictions Origin of Deed Restrictions --
Condominiums Condominiums
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
10
Sec. 202.001. Definitions. In this chapter:(4) “Restrictive Covenants”
– Covenant, Condition or Restriction contained within a Dedicatory Instrument
(1) “Dedicatory Instrument”– Governing Documents covering the Establishment,
Maintenance and Operation of an Association– Includes:
• Restrictive Covenants• Bylaws• Rules and Regulations• All lawful Amendments
Origin of Deed Restrictions Origin of Deed Restrictions
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
11
Enforcement– By Owners
– By Community Associations
– By Community Managers
– Municipal Utility District
– By a City
– By a County
Enforcing Governing DocumentsEnforcing Governing Documents
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
12
Enforcement by Owners– Owners usually have the right to enforce all use
restrictions on the property– May be equal right to all others– May be inferior right to association
Does the violation affect the Community?– Community nuisance– Private nuisance
Enforcement Enforcement --
OwnersOwners
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
13
Enforcement by Community Association– As permitted by the Texas Property Code
• Due process per Chapter 209
– As permitted by the Restrictions• May be superior right to owners and others• May be equal right to owners• May be permissive• May be mandatory
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
14
Prerequisite Procedure: Condominiums§82.102 Texas Uniform Condominium Act
Before assessing property damage or fines the Association must provide notice:
– Of the violation or property damage– The amount of fine or damage charge– Opportunity for hearing if timely requested– Opportunity to cure by a specified date – unless
a similar notice was provided within the last 12 months
– Notice of the levy of a fine sent to owner within 30 days of the fine
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
15
Source of Authority to Enforce Deed Restrictions(Planned Unit Development “PUD”)
§204.010 Texas Property Code*Unless otherwise provided by the governing documents the association may:
(10) If notice and an opportunity to be heard are given, collect reimbursement of actual attorney’s fees and other costs incurred by the property owners’ association relating to violations of the subdivision’s restrictions or the property owners’ association’s bylaws and rules;
* §204 of the Texas Property Code only applies in limited areas
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
16
Source of Authority to Enforce Deed Restrictions
§209.006 Texas Property Code
The Association or its agent must give proper notice to an owner:
–Before an association may suspend an owner's right to use a common area–File a suit against an owner
•other than a suit to collect an assessment or •foreclose under an association's lien
– Charge an owner for property damage– Levy a fine for a violation of the governing documents
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
17
§209.006 Texas Property CodeThe notice must:– Describe the violation or property
damage that is the basis for the suspension action, charge, or fine
– State any amount due the association from the owner
– Inform the owner that the owner: • Is entitled to a reasonable period to cure the
violation and avoid the fine or suspension• Unless the owner was given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to cure a similar violation within the preceding six months; and
• may request a hearing under Section 209.007 on or before the 30th day after the date the owner receives the notice.
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
18
Source of Authority to Enforce Deed Restrictions
§209.007 Texas Property Code
Hearing before Board or Designated Committee
Upon timely written request
If the hearing is before a committee:–The notice must state right of appeal to the Board
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
19
§209.007 Texas Property Code– Hearing not later than the 30th day after the date the
board receives the owner's request for a hearing– Notification required to owner as to hearing specifics at
least 10 days before the hearing date• Date – time – location –etc.
– One postponement each is permitted for a period of not more than 10 days.
– Additional postponements may be granted by agreement of the parties.
– The owner or the association may make an audio recording of the meeting.
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
20
§209.007 Texas Property Code
– Notice and hearing provisions are not applicable:– If a suit is filed seeking a temporary restraining order or
temporary injunctive relief– If a suit is filed that includes foreclosure as a cause of
action– Either party may file a motion to compel mediation– to a temporary suspension of a person's right to use
common areas– if the temporary suspension is the result of a violation that
occurred in a common area and involved a significant and immediate risk of harm to others in the subdivision.
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
21
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Community AssociationsCommunity Associations
The Board
Ultimate responsibility for the enforcement of the Association’s deed restrictions lies with the Board of Directors
Failure to act can have legal consequences– Attractive Nuisance– Foreseeable Crime
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
22
The Manager’s RoleManager is an agent – and its authority can not exceed that of its principalManager’s authority is found in the management agreement and Board directivesManager’s role is to guide and assist the Board with the enforcement of the dedicatory instruments
Manager should refuse to act if directed to act in illegal, immoral, or unethical manner, outside the scope of the deed restrictions or management agreement
Enforcement Enforcement ––
The Community ManagerThe Community Manager
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
23
Enforcement by Municipal Utility Districts
– Standing to enforce dependent upon value of the property being in issue
– If non-enforcement effects property values of lot with restriction or others in the area
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Municipal Utility DistrictsMunicipal Utility Districts
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
24
Enforcement by a City
– The Local Government Code permits but does not require a municipality to pursue deed restriction violations
– Some municipalities have determined that they will in proper circumstances enforce restriction violations with limitations
– Example: Enforcement limited to set back and residential use
Enforcement Enforcement ––
The CityThe City
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
25
Associations should consider before enforcing a restrictive covenant if there is municipal authority for enforcement via an ordinance.
Enforcement Enforcement ––
The CityThe City
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
26
Enforcement by a County
– Texas Property Code Section 203
• County Attorney may sue to enforce restrictive covenants
• Applies only to counties with a population in excess of 200,000
Enforcement Enforcement ––
The CountyThe County
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
27
Sec. 203.003 Texas Property CodeCounty attorney authorized to enforce restrictions.
– (a) The county attorney may sue in a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin or abate violations of a restriction contained or incorporated by reference in a properly recorded plan, plat, replat, or other instrument affecting a real property subdivision located in the county, regardless of the date on which the instrument was recorded.
Enforcement Enforcement ––
The CountyThe County
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
28
Restrictions and Zoning– The inter-relationship
– Which is more restrictive
– Zoning may not relax requirements of restrictions
– Restrictions are enforceable if more restrictive than zoning ordinances
Enforcement Enforcement ––
Restrictions & ZoningRestrictions & Zoning
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
29
Recovery of attorney’s fees:
The person/entity that brings an action to enforce restrictive covenants and prevails in that action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees (5.006 Property Code)
With a condominium the person/entity that prevails shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees (chapter 82 Property Code)
Authority to Enforce Deed RestrictionsAuthority to Enforce Deed Restrictions
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
30
Authority to Enforce Deed Restrictions Authority to Enforce Deed Restrictions
(Planned Unit Development)§ 209.008. Attorney’s Fees
The association may collect attorney's fees and costs for enforcing the governing documents, if:
Written notice is provided if the violation continues
An owner is not liable for attorney's fees if the attorney's fees are incurred before the conclusion of the hearing under Section 209.007, or
The owner does not timely request a hearing The owner's presence is not required to hold a hearing
under Section 209.007.
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
31
Authority to Enforce Deed RestrictionsAuthority to Enforce Deed Restrictions
(Planned Unit Development)§ 209.008. Attorney’s Fees
(c) All attorney's fees, costs, and other amounts collected from an owner shall be deposited into an account maintained at a financial institution in the name of the association or its managing agent. Only members of the association's board or its managing agent or employees of its managing agent may be signatories on the account.
(d) On written request from the owner, the association shall provide copies of invoices for attorney's fees and other costs relating only to the matter for which the association seeks reimbursement of fees and costs.
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
32
The Lawsuit The Lawsuit --
The Temporary Restraining Order
Issued by Court without testimony
Not favored
Should not be requested without a proper reason
Must have something to show the court to establish necessity
If granted is for very limited duration
Show cause is issued setting a hearing promptly
Bond is required
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
33
The Lawsuit The Lawsuit --
The Temporary Injunction
MINI TRIAL -Issued by Court with testimony and after:
Determination that money damages will not be sufficient
The applicant is determined to more than likely prevail at time of trial
Bond is set and postedCase is set for trial
Irreparable harm required?
Indian Beach v. Linden – required showing of irreparable injury
Most decisions state no burden of proving any actual harm
CPRCCopyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
34
The Lawsuit The Lawsuit ––
Permanent Injunction Permanent Injunction
Goal is an order that is enforceable by contempt
Must be clear and un-ambiguous
Specify what must be done
And when
Have a mechanism for verifying compliance
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
35
Free use of land
Liberal Interpretation
Reasonableness
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
36
Free use of land
– For many years the law as to enforcement of deed restrictions was (and still may be) to favor free use of the land and against those who seek to restrict the use of the property in cases of ambiguity.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
37
Liberal Interpretation
– A restrictive covenant shall be liberally construed to give effect to its purposes and intent.Texas Property Code Section 202.003(a)
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
38
The Current Balance (in most courts):
Covenants should be liberally construed to determine the framer’s intent, and if there is any ambiguity as to that intent, the covenant should then be strictly construed in favor of the free and unrestricted use of the premises.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
39
Presumption of Reasonableness:An Exercise of discretionary authority
by a
property owners’ association or other representative designated by an owner of real property concerning a restrictive covenant is presumed reasonable
unless the court
determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the exercise of discretionary authority was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.
Texas Property Code 202.0034(a)
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
40
Arbitrary– Failure to exercise honest judgment
Capricious– Freakish, whimsical, fickle, changeable,
unsteady, and arbitrary
Discriminatory– Failure to treat all persons equally
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
41
Statute of Limitations – 4 years– But beware of the discovery rule
Latches - equitable
Waiver
Abandonment
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
42
Waiver– Acquiesced to such substantial violations
within the restricted area as to amount to an abandonment of the covenant
– Change in conditions in the restricted area or surrounding area --- no longer possible to secure any substantial degree of benefits to be realized through the covenants.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
43
Waiver
A finding of waiver requires that a POA voluntarily and intentionally relinquished its right to enforce the restrictive covenants.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
44
Waiver– Of a provision or provisions– Of the entire set of restrictions– Would a reasonable person conclude that the
restrictions had been abandoned based upon the number, nature and severity of other existing violations.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
45
Waiver
– Equity test
– The fairness to a lot owner must be weighed against the fairness to their lot owners who have acquired their property on the strength of the restrictions.
Interpretation of Restrictive CovenantsInterpretation of Restrictive Covenants
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
46
Variance
Authority
– Governing Documents• Architectural Guidelines• Restrictive Covenants
– Thin Air
Utilization of Variances– Reasonable– Arbitrary – Discriminatory– Ethical Issues
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
47
Variance
Determination of authority
Presumption of authority
Reasons why variance is given:– Topography– Natural obstruction– Aesthetic considerations– Hardship considerations– Environmental considerations– Other
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
48
Variance
Variance
– The ARC may grant a variance to as to any provision in these restrictions as a result of hardship, natural obstruction, topography, environmental considerations or aesthetics
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
49
Variance
Sample Provision– “The ARC may grant a variance if in its sole and
absolute discretion the granting of the same will not change the overall appearance of the subdivision.”
– Yard Art • “Each Owner may, subject to approval of the architectural
committee, have one or more items in their front yard of an artistic nature”
– Driveways • “All driveways must be constructed of concrete and may be
sealed but not stained”
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
50
Yard Art
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
51
Yard Art
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
52
Variance
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
53
Driveways
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
54
Adopted by U.S. Congress in 1988
Amendment to the Civil Rights Act of 1968
Adoption of Act by Texas in 1993 as Chapter 301 Texas Property Code
Fair Housing ActFair Housing Act
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
55
The FHA prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status and disability.
Fair Housing ActFair Housing Act
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
56
Handicap:
“A physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person’s major life activities, a record of having such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment”
Fair Housing ActFair Housing Act
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
57
Gittleman v. Woodhaven Condominium Ass’n, Inc., and Maintenance Management, Inc., 972 F. Supp 894 (U.S. Dist. Ct. New Jersey, 1997).As condominium associations assume more powers traditionally associated with the state, it is only fair that they assume more of the obligations for ensuring that the rights of the unit owners they represent are protected.
Fair Housing Act Fair Housing Act ––
Reasonable AccommodationReasonable Accommodation
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
58
The Telecommunications Act of 1996The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
59
The Telecommunications Act of 1996The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
60
Restrictions which prohibit the following are void:
– Satellite dishes of 1 meter or less in size
– Broadcast antennas
– Multipoint multi-channel distribution service
The Telecommunications Act of 1996The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
61
No rule or regulation may unreasonably delay or add unreasonable costs to an individuals right to receive signals.
May not require a written request for approval that is not instantly reviewed
May not require any review fee
The location of the antenna is very site specific
The Telecommunications Act of 1996The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
62
1. Peer pressure
2. Revocation of vote or use privileges
3. Fines
4. Assistance from public agencies
5. Self help
6. Limited variance
7. Legal action
Examples of Remedies for ViolationsExamples of Remedies for Violations
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
63
QuestionsQuestions
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved
64
Houston Office:
2800 Post Oak Blvd. 57th Floor Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: (713) 840-1666 Facsimile: (713) 840-9404
Dallas Office: (By Appointment Only)
6116 N. Central Expressway Suite 1201 Dallas, Texas 75206 Telephone: (214) 365-9290 Facsimile: (214) 373-9879
San Antonio Office: (By Appointment Only)
750 E. Mulberry Ave. Suite 404 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Telephone: (210) 731-8858 Facsimile: (210) 731-8853
Beaumont Office: 2530 Calder Beaumont, Texas 77702 Telephone: (409) 212-0600 Facsimile: (409) 212-0604
Sugar Land Office: The Plaza Building 2277 Plaza Drive Suite 290 Sugar Land, Texas 77479 Telephone: (281) 207-7697 Facsimile: (713) 840-9404
Contact Us
Copyright © 2010 by Roberts Markel P.C., all rights reserved