rebuilding the world with green brics

1
Rebuilding the World with Green BRICs Desiree Hubby, Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences & Honors College Faculty Mentor: Ryan Engen, Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences Developed nations grew rich in part through overexploiting natural resources, dumping greenhouse gases and other pollutants into the atmosphere and encouraging consumerist lifestyles with little concern for the long-term effects on the our collective home–Planet Earth. Today, these patterns are being replicated in developing nations. In particular, Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICs) have a rising global middle class that desires to live an American lifestyle, complete with cars, refrigerators, air conditioners and other sources of pollution. Factors contributing to this global problem include inadequate responses to climate change, increases in global consumption, and dangerous dependency on non-renewable resources of energy. What is needed is a Green Energy Revolution for developed and developing countries. Specifically, the international community needs to collectively explore green, energy-efficient ways of living use of fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy alternatives and more efficient systems, and, (2) closing the gap between rich and poor nations to alleviate poverty, especially with respect to energy-poverty in developing countries. ABSTRACT Benefits of a Green World: Improve overall human health by decreasing infant mortality rates and health problems, while increasing life expectancy Significantly reduce environmental impact of humans Switching to renewable energy would prevent acid rain and toxic and nuclear waste Create over four million green jobs for America Decrease greenhouse gases by at least 30% Supply global energy and food security New economic growth opportunities Reduce poverty and increase standard of living for developing countries Provide reliable energy and interconnected systems between countries WHY CODE GREEN? The first Green Revolution successfully increased food production through high-yielding crops and helped alleviate world hunger. The Green Energy Revolution should aim to include every country as a foundation for international cooperation. Saving the Earth, sustaining the global population, and ensuring the future livelihood of humankind are the principal goals of a green energy revolution. First, diminish U.S. dependency on and global demand for oil which fuels the growth of petro-dictatorships like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Russia. Access to oil and natural gas translates into economic growth and political power. The problem is the majority of these OPEC countries have corrupt leaders whose strategic interest is opposed to any greening of the world economy. In order to move forward, the U.S. must find alternative fuel sources to decrease the demand for oil. The end result will increase efficiency, lower production costs, and diminish the inverse relationship between oil and democracy. Secondly, make the switch to renewable and green energy sources as part of a low-carbon path to green energy production. Renewable energy is the most reliable and efficient way to produce energy with the least amount of harm to the environment. The U.S. has already started initiatives to make solar, bio-energy, hydro, and fuel cell acceleration major energy sources. There are numerous other clean- energy alternatives that are currently being developed such as biomass, geothermal, wind, and wave. California has enjoyed the most progress in switching to higher proportions of green energy through higher energy standards and investments in clean energy alternatives. Third, Code Green can only triumph if there is a worldwide effort aimed at reaching long-term sustainability goals. Even if America initiates the first green steps in the movement, if every country does not follow the U.S. lead, then any progress could be short-lived. Weaker countries are not capable of participating in a green energy revolution without the assistance of developed countries. Developing countries are contributing a rapidly increasing A GREEN ENERGY REVOLUTION SOLUTION Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2008. Print. Goldstone, Jack A. “The New Population Bomb.” Foreign Affairs 89:1 (2010): 1-7. PROQUEST. Web. 29 January 2010. Naim, Moises. “Can the World Afford A Middle Class?” Foreign Policy 22:165 (2008): 96. Print. O’Neill, Jim. “We need Brics to build the world economy; Before long Brazil, Russia, India and China will be bigger then all the G7 Countries combined.” The London Times Edition 1 (2009): 24. LEXISNEXIS. Web. 28. January 2010. Reinton, Per Olav.“The Development Perspective of the Green Revolution.” Sage Publications 4.2 (1973): 171-176. SAGEPUB. Web. 1 February 2010. Stern, Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print. Photos courtesy of: www.impactlab.com, www.wordpress.com, peltiertech.com BIBLIOGRAPHY Climate change is one of the most debated phenomena among scientists, politicians, leaders, and people all over the world. This is so, in part, because climate change is difficult to measure. More significantly, the long term catastrophic effects are seen as abstract threats in some undefined future, whereas the costs associated with addressing climate change are viewed as real and immediate. However, if the world does not collectively embrace “Code Green” as part of a Green Energy Revolution, it could cause irreversible damage to the Earth’s environment. We are already seeing many effects of “global climate disruption” (Friedman 134): rising oceans, changing weather patterns, deforestation, and biodiversity loss are a fraction of the environmental effects of climate change. Additionally, there are numerous predicted social and economic costs which would result in up to 10% loss of world GDP, and more devastating effects for economies of developing countries (Stern 9). An inescapable contributor to this global problem is the global population bomb, especially in the BRIC countries. The BRIC countries already contain 42% of the global population, and within the next 50 years it is expected that 70% of the population will be concentrated in the developing countries (Goldstone 3). For example, China has the fastest growing urban population and middle class. It already has a middle class of 600 million people whose consumption patterns are approaching those in the U.S. (Nam 96). This number will increase significantly in the next few decades. The Chinese economy is experiencing unprecedented growth rates and their GDP is expected to match or even surpass the U.S. GDP in the next twenty years (O'Neill 1). This growth is being fueled primarily through oil and coal. The increased production of consumer goods, food, energy, space, and more fossil fuels released in the atmosphere will overwhelm any green progress made in other countries. India, Brazil, and Russia are quickly following a similar path, resulting in an unsustainable future for the planet and humankind. WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Wendy K. Wilkins, Ph.D., Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Gloria C. Cox, Ph.D., Dean, Honors College Susan Brown Eve, Ph.D., Associate Dean, Honors College Ryan Engen, Ph.D., Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences

Upload: blake-garcia

Post on 03-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

ABSTRACT. WHY CODE GREEN?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rebuilding the World with Green BRICs

Rebuilding the World with Green BRICsDesiree Hubby, Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences & Honors College

Faculty Mentor: Ryan Engen, Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences

Developed nations grew rich in part through overexploiting natural resources, dumping greenhouse gases and other pollutants into the atmosphere and encouraging consumerist lifestyles with little concern for the long-term effects on the our collective home–Planet Earth. Today, these patterns are being replicated in developing nations. In particular, Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICs) have a rising global middle class that desires to live an American lifestyle, complete with cars, refrigerators, air conditioners and other sources of pollution. Factors contributing to this global problem include inadequate responses to climate change, increases in global consumption, and dangerous dependency on non-renewable resources of energy. What is needed is a Green Energy Revolution for developed and developing countries. Specifically, the international community needs to collectively explore green, energy-efficient ways of living and producing that include (1) switching from the use of fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy alternatives and more efficient systems, and, (2) closing the gap between rich and poor nations to alleviate poverty, especially with respect to energy-poverty in developing countries.

ABSTRACTBenefits of a Green World:

Improve overall human health by decreasing infant mortality rates and health problems, while increasing life expectancy

Significantly reduce environmental impact of humans

Switching to renewable energy would prevent acid rain and toxic and nuclear  waste

Create over four million green jobs for America

Decrease greenhouse gases by at least 30%

Supply global energy and food security

New economic growth opportunities

Reduce poverty and increase standard of living for developing countries

Provide reliable energy and interconnected systems between countries

WHY CODE GREEN?

The first Green Revolution successfully increased food production through high-yielding crops and helped alleviate world hunger. The Green Energy Revolution should aim to include every country as a foundation for international cooperation. Saving the Earth, sustaining the global population, and ensuring the future livelihood of humankind are the principal goals of a green energy revolution.

First, diminish U.S. dependency on and global demand for oil which fuels the growth of petro-dictatorships like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Russia. Access to oil and natural gas translates into economic growth and political power. The problem is the majority of these OPEC countries have corrupt leaders whose strategic interest is opposed to any greening of the world economy. In order to move forward, the U.S. must find alternative fuel sources to decrease the demand for oil. The end result will increase efficiency, lower production costs, and diminish the inverse relationship between oil and democracy. Secondly, make the switch to renewable and green energy sources as part of a low-carbon path to green energy production. Renewable energy is the most reliable and efficient way to produce energy with the least amount of harm to the environment. The U.S. has already started initiatives to make solar, bio-energy, hydro, and fuel cell acceleration major energy sources. There are numerous other clean-energy alternatives that are currently being developed such as biomass, geothermal, wind, and wave. California has enjoyed the most progress in switching to higher proportions of green energy through higher energy standards and investments in clean energy alternatives. 

Third, Code Green can only triumph if there is a worldwide effort aimed at reaching long-term sustainability goals. Even if America initiates the first green steps in the movement, if every country does not follow the U.S. lead, then any progress could be short-lived. Weaker countries are not capable of participating in a green energy revolution without the assistance of developed countries.  Developing countries are contributing a rapidly increasing amount of greenhouse gases and their cooperation is crucial to a successful green energy revolution. 

Lastly, sustainable research and development are essential to improving current technologies, while creating new information and energy technology.  This involves two key players, the creative minds of entrepreneurs and the active participation of government institutions for policy implementation. The global recession has reduced R&D funds, which has brought green development to a standstill. Code Green is an expensive undertaking; however, through innovation and more efficient technology, it can become an affordable and even profitable new way of living.

A GREEN ENERGY REVOLUTION SOLUTION

Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2008. Print.

Goldstone, Jack A. “The New Population Bomb.” Foreign Affairs 89:1 (2010): 1-7. PROQUEST. Web. 29 January 2010.

Naim, Moises. “Can the World Afford A Middle Class?” Foreign Policy 22:165 (2008): 96. Print.

O’Neill, Jim. “We need Brics to build the world economy; Before long Brazil, Russia, India and China will be bigger then all the G7 Countries combined.” The London Times Edition 1 (2009): 24. LEXISNEXIS. Web. 28. January 2010.

Reinton, Per Olav.“The Development Perspective of the Green Revolution.” Sage Publications 4.2 (1973): 171-176. SAGEPUB. Web. 1 February 2010.

Stern, Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.

Photos courtesy of: www.impactlab.com, www.wordpress.com, www.dfg.ca.gov, www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au, peltiertech.com

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Climate change is one of the most debated phenomena among scientists, politicians, leaders, and people all over the world. This is so, in part, because climate change is difficult to measure. More significantly, the long term catastrophic effects are seen as abstract threats in some undefined future, whereas the costs associated with addressing climate change are viewed as real and immediate. However, if the world does not collectively embrace “Code Green” as part of a Green Energy Revolution, it could cause irreversible damage to the Earth’s environment. We are already seeing many effects of “global climate disruption” (Friedman 134): rising oceans, changing weather patterns, deforestation, and biodiversity loss are a fraction of the environmental effects of climate change. Additionally, there are numerous predicted social and economic costs which would result in up to 10% loss of world GDP, and more devastating effects for economies of developing countries (Stern 9).

An inescapable contributor to this global problem is the global population bomb, especially in the BRIC countries. The BRIC countries already contain 42% of the global population, and within the next 50 years it is expected that 70% of the population will be concentrated in the developing countries (Goldstone 3). For example, China has the fastest growing urban population and middle class. It already has a middle class of 600 million people whose consumption patterns are approaching those in the U.S. (Nam 96). This number will increase significantly in the next few decades. The Chinese economy is experiencing unprecedented growth rates and their GDP is expected to match or even surpass the U.S. GDP in the next twenty years (O'Neill 1). This growth is being fueled primarily through oil and coal. The increased production of consumer goods, food, energy, space, and more fossil fuels released in the atmosphere will overwhelm any green progress made in other countries. India, Brazil, and Russia are quickly following a similar path, resulting in an unsustainable future for the planet and humankind.

WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Wendy K. Wilkins, Ph.D., Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

Gloria C. Cox, Ph.D., Dean, Honors College

Susan Brown Eve, Ph.D., Associate Dean, Honors College

Ryan Engen, Ph.D., Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences