recent developments in group actions in the united states
DESCRIPTION
Recent Developments In Group Actions in the United States. Elizabeth Cabraser Sara Gourley Luanne Sacks John Sherk March 2, 2006. Agenda. Recurring Issues In U.S. Class Action Cases Litigation vs. Settlement Statewide vs. Nationwide Opt-in vs. Opt-out Classes Attorneys’ Fees - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Recent Developments In Group Actions in the United States
Elizabeth CabraserSara GourleyLuanne SacksJohn Sherk March 2, 2006
Agenda Recurring Issues In U.S. Class Action Cases
Litigation vs. Settlement Statewide vs. Nationwide Opt-in vs. Opt-out Classes Attorneys’ Fees
Efforts To Address These Issues
Multi-District Litigation Tort Actions Under CAFA Mass Actions under MMTJA Administrative Claims Processes
Vaccine Black Lung Asbestos?
Challenges
Which Forum’s Law Will Apply
In re Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 forum must have “significant contact or significant
aggregation of contacts” to claims of each class member such that applying law would not be arbitrary or unfair
Phillips determines which jurisdictions’ law could apply, not necessarily which jurisdiction’s law must
Analysis complicated by “Depecage” issue-specific choice of law
Why Does Choice of Law Matter ? No federal consumer fraud or tort damages
statutes
Each state legislates independently Some allow consumer class actions Some cap damages Some do not allow punitive damages Statutes of limitation differ
Choice of law can determine viability of claims Country State
MultiDistrict Litigation (“MDLs”)
MDL statute centralizes multiple federal cases in one forum
Coordinates pretrial litigationMechanism to aggregate claims even
absent class actionsNo statute requires state courts to
coordinateSome states have intra-state “MDLs”
Class Action Fairness Act - 28 U.S.C. § 1332
“Federalizes” Interstate Class Actions
2 main provisions:Expands federal jurisdiction/removalRequires notification to state and federal
authorities of all proposed settlements
Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act (“MMTJA”) – 28 U.S.C. § 1369
Federal jurisdiction requires:
Minimal (not complete) diversity between adverse parties
Single accident, discrete location, 75 deaths
The federal court must abstain from hearing such a civil action if:
The “substantial majority” of plaintiffs and the “primary defendants” are citizens of same state, AND
The laws of that same state will govern the claims asserted
MMTJA Trials
Liability and damages bifurcated: cases remanded to state courts for damages trials
Appeal of liability determination: prior to remand
Class Action Challenges
Industry Specific IssuesConsumer ElectronicsAutomobilesTobaccoPharmaceutical/Medical DeviceEnvironmentalAviation
Attorneys’ Fees Settlement
Recent Developments In Group Actions in the United States
Elizabeth CabraserSara GourleyLuanne SacksJohn Sherk March 2, 2006