recent migration flows to the eu€¦ · frontex, the european border and coastguard agency,...
TRANSCRIPT
Frontex, the European border and coastguard agency, collects data on detections by national border-control authorities of illegal crossings of the EU’s external borders. External borders are those between Member States and third countries, as well as between Schengen Associated Countries (Norway, Iceland and Switzerland) and third countries.
Detections of illegal border crossings in the EU (2019)
141 741Detections of illegal border crossings in the EU in 2019 (149 036 in 2018) Migratory routes
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Western Balkans
Monthly average(in 1 000)
4
64
111 0.5 1
Central Mediterranean
Monthly average(in 1 000) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
14 13 15 10 2 1
Western Mediterranean
Monthly average(in 1 000)
1 1 1 2 5 22014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Eastern Mediterranean
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20194
74
154 5 7Monthly average
(in 1 000)
All routes 6-monthly data (in 1 000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
91 192 229
1 594
360151 114 91 62 87 44 98
9,9%
141 741
EasternMediterranean
WesternMediterranean
WesternBalkans
CentralMediterranean
Western African: 1,9 %
Circular Route: 1,4 % Other: 0,5 %
58,8%
16,9%
10,7%
EasternMediterranean 83 333
WesternBalkans 15 127
CentralMediterranean 14 003
WesternMediterranean 23 969
WesternAfrica 2 718WesternAfrica 2 7182 712 7182
Casablanca
Dakar
Accra
Agadez
Sebha
LampedusaTripoli
AlgiersOran
OujdaOuargla
Cairo
Addis Ababa
Nairobi
Alexandria
Lagos
Top 15 migrant nationalities (2019) (in 1 000)
Tunisia
Cameroon Bangladesh
Albania
Afghanistan, 34
Others, 29
Syria, 24
Morocco, 8
Turkey, 8
Iraq6
Pakistan 4
Algeria5
Congo 8
Tunisia, 3Cameroon, 2
Palestine 4
Bangladesh
2
Iran3
Somalia3
Albania2
The map shows the different routes and the number of illegal entries into the EU in 2019 for each route. The line chart shows the number of illegal crossings at six-monthly intervals, and the pie chart the share that each route represents in the total. The four boxes below denote the monthly average number of illegal border crossings for each route. The table shows the top 15 nationalities of migrants.
Recent migration flows to the EU
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service
Author: Giulio Sabbati Graphics: Samy Chahri, Lucille Killmayer Members' Research Service
PE 649.329 - April 2020
BRIEFINGInfographic
Missing migrants along the Mediterranean migratory routesThe International Organization for Migration (IOM) carries out the Missing Migrants project, aimed at compiling data on migrants who have died or gone missing, either at the external borders or in the migration process. It excludes, for instance, deaths in refugee camps or during return to a migrant’s homeland, or as a result of labour exploitation. Various sources of data are used such as relevant national authorities, IOM field missions, direct reporting by IOM and other organisations receiving survivors, and media reports. IOM and UNHCR make sure that data are consistent.
The map shows the number of deaths on the Mediterranean routes for the period 2015 to 2019. The bar chart below on the left compares the number of deaths for the last six years. The line chart shows the evolution of the phenomenon by six-monthly periods.The three boxes on the right represent the monthly average number of migrant deaths on the three Mediterranean routes in the last six years, as well as an estimated gender breakdown.It can be seen, for instance, that in 2015, despite the increase in migrant flows in the Eastern Mediterranean (see previous page), the Central Mediterranean remained the more deadly route, with nearly two deaths for every 100 travellers.
Eastern Mediterranean
567 36 5Monthly average
Gender
FM15 62014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Central Mediterranean264 262
382238
Monthly average
Gender
FM
110 105
2014 2015 2016 20175 9 11 19
Western Mediterranean
Monthly average
Gender
FM
2018 2019
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
68 46
6-monthly data (in 1 000)
2014 2015 2016 2017
0.7 2.5 1.8 1.9 2.9 2.1 2.3 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.6 1.3
2018 2019
201920182017201620152014
3 2834 054
5 143
3 1392 299
1 885
1 262Central Mediterranean (2019)
71Eastern Mediterranean (2019)
552Western Mediterranean (2019)
1 885Deaths of migrants recorded in the Mediterranean in 2019
Notes. Data on fatalities are challenging to collect because reporting on deaths is poor, countless bodies are never found and the involvement of criminal actors means there may be fear among survivors to report deaths, and some deaths may be actively covered up. For instance, in 2015, over 50 % of deaths recorded by the Missing Migrants Project refer to migrants who are presumed dead and whose bodies have not been found (mainly at sea). The sex of the deceased is unrecorded in over 80 % of cases.
2
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service
Asylum applicants in the EU-27The bar chart shows the number of asylum applicants in the European Union. ‘Applicants’ refers to anyone applying for asylum or similar protection – as defined in the Qualification Directive – or included in an application as a family member. The table shows the breakdown of those Member States which together represent more than 90 % of the total requests for asylum in 2019.
The map shows the relative weight of the number of applicants per million inhabitants in the ‘country of arrival’ (the EU Member State in which asylum has been requested) for the year 2019. The EU average is 1 513 applicants per million inhabitants. The bar below the map shows the range of applicants within the Member States. The horizontal bar chart shows the top 20 countries of origin for the year 2019. The value in parenthesis represents changes with respect to 2018; a positive value shows an increase, negative a decrease (e.g. there was a decrease of 6 000 applicants from Syria in 2019 compared to the year 2018).
In 1 000 applicants
Top 20 countries of origin
(-6)(13)(23)(22)
(-10)(1)(2)(0)(2)
(-1)(-2)(1)(2)
(-1)(-1)(-3)(1)(2)
(-0.1)(-0.5)
SyriaAfghanistan
VenezuelaColombia
IraqPakistan
TurkeyNigeria
GeorgiaAlbania
IranBangladesh
SomaliaRussia
GuineaEritrea
MoroccoDemocratic Republic of the Congo
AlgeriaUkraine
7757
4532
3127
2424
221919
15141413
101010109
Asylum applicants per million inhabitant(2015)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 100000
5000
10000
15000
20000
More than 3 500
1 900 - 3 500
700 - 1 899
150 - 699
Less than 150
Applicants per million inhabitants
15 584423 5001 900700150
Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular group or political opinion in their country of origin or residence. In the EU, this consists of refugee status as defined in the UN Geneva Refugee Convention, plus subsidiary protection for persons who do not qualify as refugees but in respect of whom substantial grounds exist that the person concerned, if returned to their country of origin, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm as defined in the Qualification Directive.Not all those who cross the EU’s external borders illegally will seek asylum, or indeed qualify under the definition above. They thus form part of the broader category of ‘irregular immigrants’, i.e. those who do not fulfil, or no longer fulfil, the conditions of entry as set out in Article 5 of the Schengen Borders Code or other conditions for entry, stay or residence in that Member State.
Country code (ordered by number of asylum applicants in 2019): Germany (DE), France (FR), Spain (ES), Greece (EL), Italy (IT), Belgium (BE), Sweden (SE), Netherlands (NL), Cyprus (CY). Others: Austria (AT), Ireland (IE), Finland (FI), Malta (MT), Poland (PL), Slovenia (SI), Den-mark (DK), Romania (RO), Luxembourg (LU), Bulgaria (BG), Czechia (CZ), Portugal (PT), Croatia (HR), Lithuania (LT), Hungary (HU), Slovakia (SK), Latvia (LV), Estonia (EE)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
DE 127 203 477 745 223 184 166FR 66 64 76 84 99 120 129ES 4 6 15 16 37 54 118EL 8 9 13 51 59 67 77IT 27 65 84 123 129 60 44BE 21 23 45 18 18 23 27SE 54 81 162 29 26 22 26NL 13 24 45 21 18 24 25CY 1 2 2 3 5 8 14Others 79 117 364 131 64 47 50
In 1 000 applicants
In 1 000 applicants
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20192008 2009 2010
225 232 235 282 306401
594677 676
608
1283128312211221
3
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service
First instance decisions (in Eurostat data) refer to decisions taken by administrative or judicial bodies in Member States on refugee status and subsidiary protection, as well as authorisations to stay for humanitarian reasons. First instance decisions also include decisions granted to persons who are subject to the Dublin Regulation.The number of asylum applicants and the number of first instance decisions during a given year differs. This is due to the time elapsed between a request being submitted and the decision. This time varies considerably, depending on national asylum procedures and the administrative workload of Member States.The first graph shows the aggregate of positive decisions for the EU-27. The bar represents the positive decisions in thousands while the circles give the percentage that positive decisions represent in total decisions. The second graph presents the distribution between positive and negative decisions by Member State for the year 2019.
First instance decisions on asylum in the EU-27
Positive first instance decisions on asylum in the EU-27
First instance decisions on asylum by Member State (2019)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% Negative decision
Positive decision
CZPLFRUK
HUHR
DKESBGITELSE
EU-2
8FINL
DE
CYBEPTATROEESILUSKMTLVLTIE
Negative decision
Positive decision
HUCZPLHRITLVPTFRLTSEBGFINLBEEU27SKMTSICYRODEEEDKIEELATLUES
89%
77%
74%
69%
67%
66%
63%
61%
60%
53%
52%
52%
51%
50%
49%
48%
46%
44
%4
3% 41%
36%
35%
34%
32%
31%
31%
29%
25%
12%
66%
57%
53%
53%
52%
52%
50%
46% 44
%4
0%
40
%39
%39
%38
%38
%37
%34
%32
%29
%28
%25
%23
%23
%20
%17
%13
%10
%8%
11%
23%
26%
31%
33%
34%
38%
39%
40
%4
7%4
8%4
8%4
9%50
%51
%52
%54
%56
%57
%59
%64
%65
%66
%68
%69
%69
%71
%75
%88
%
34%
43%
47% 47%
48%
48%
50%
54%
56%
60%
60%
61%
61%
62%
62%
63%
66%
68%
71%
72%
75%
77%
77%
80%
83%
87%
90%
92%
Negative decisionsPositive
HUCZPLHRITLVPTFRLTSEBGFINLBE
EU-2
7SKMTSICYRODEEEDKIEELATLUES
Positive decisions (left axis, in 1 000)Positive decisions as % of total decisions(right axis)
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
201920182017201620152014201320122011
24.7%
31.9%33.9%
46.1%
52.6%
61.6%
45.9%
37.5% 38.1%443
5283 99
157
294
663
429
207 206
Positive decisions
Negative decisions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% Negative decision
Positive decision
CZPLFRUK
HUHR
DKESBGITELSE
EU-2
8FINL
DE
CYBEPTATROEESILUSKMTLVLTIE
Negative decision
Positive decision
HUCZPLHRITLVPTFRLTSEBGFINLBEEU27SKMTSICYRODEEEDKIEELATLUES
89%
77%
74%
69%
67%
66%
63%
61%
60%
53%
52%
52%
51%
50%
49%
48%
46%
44
%4
3% 41%
36%
35%
34%
32%
31%
31%
29%
25%
12%
66%
57%
53%
53%
52%
52%
50%
46% 44
%4
0%
40
%39
%39
%38
%38
%37
%34
%32
%29
%28
%25
%23
%23
%20
%17
%13
%10
%8%
11%
23%
26%
31%
33%
34%
38%
39%
40
%4
7%4
8%4
8%4
9%50
%51
%52
%54
%56
%57
%59
%64
%65
%66
%68
%69
%69
%71
%75
%88
%
34%
43%
47% 47%
48%
48%
50%
54%
56%
60%
60%
61%
61%
62%
62%
63%
66%
68%
71%
72%
75%
77%
77%
80%
83%
87%
90%
92%
Negative decisionsPositive
HUCZPLHRITLVPTFRLTSEBGFINLBE
EU-2
7SKMTSICYRODEEEDKIEELATLUES
Positive decisions (left axis, in 1 000)Positive decisions as % of total decisions(right axis)
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
201920182017201620152014201320122011
24.7%
31.9%33.9%
46.1%
52.6%
61.6%
45.9%
37.5% 38.1%443
5283 99
157
294
663
429
207 206
Positive decisions
Negative decisions
Data source: Frontex, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Eurostat (migr_asyappctza and migr_asydcfsta)Extraction date: data were extracted in March 2020.This Infographic updates and complements previous editions issued in September 2015 (PE 565.905), in April 2016 (PE 580.893), in February 2017 (PE 595.918), in December 2017 (PE 614.604) and in May 2018 (PE 621.862).
DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.© European Union, 2020.
[email protected] (contact)http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet)http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet)http://epthinktank.eu (blog)
4
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service