recent results from clas
DESCRIPTION
Recent Results from CLAS. K. Hicks (Ohio University) Hadron 2013 (Nara, Japan) Thursday, November 7. General Comments. There are is so much data from CLAS that it is not possible to cover it all in 25 minutes. I must make some choices: New resonances from KY photoproduction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Recent Results from CLAS
K. Hicks (Ohio University)Hadron 2013 (Nara, Japan)Thursday, November 7
![Page 2: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
General Comments
• There are is so much data from CLAS that it is not possible to cover it all in 25 minutes.
• I must make some choices:– New resonances from KY photoproduction– Meson photoproduction: , , , p h w pp– New cross sections: K*Y and KY* photoproduction– Dark photon search from p0 Dalitz decays
• Apologies to Stan: I have only 50 slides.
![Page 3: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The CLAS Detector
![Page 4: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Polarization observables in pseudoscalar meson production4 Complex amplitudes: 16 real polarization observables.
Complete measurement from 8 carefully chosen observables.
πN has large cross section but in KY recoil is self-analysing
I. S. Barker, A. Donnachie, J. K. Storrow, Nucl. Phys. B95 347 (1975).
πN KY
recoil targ γ
γ targ recoil
☻☻☻
☻
linearly polarized photons
☻☻☻☻☻☻
longitudinally polarized target
☻☻☻☻☻☻
circ polarized photons
☻☻☻☻☻☻
☻☻☻☻☻☻
transversely polarized target
Complete, andover-determined
![Page 5: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Establishing the nucleon spectrum
A.V. Anisovich et al (BnGa), EPJ A48, 15 (2012) M. Mc Cracken et al.(CLAS), Phys.RevC81,025201,2010
Essential new data on hyperon production γp→K+Λ→K+pπ- From elastic πN scattering to γN reactions.
![Page 6: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Strangeness production γp→K+Λ→K+pπ-
M. Mc Cracken et al. (CLAS), Phys. Rev. C 81, 025201, 2010 D. Bradford et al. (CLAS), Phys.Rev. C75, 035205, 2007
Λ Recoil polarization γ->Λ Polarization transfer
![Page 7: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
V. Crede & W. Roberts, Rept. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013)
Photoproduction data from JLAB, ELSA, GRAAL, LEPS
N/Δ spectrum in RPP 2012
![Page 8: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
N* spectrum in LQCD
mπ=396MeV
N(1860)5/2+
N(1900)3/2+
N(1880)1/2+
N(2060)5/2-
N(2120)3/2-
N(1875)3/2-
N(1895)1/2-
Do new candidate states fit in projected Lattice QCD spectrum?
Ignoring the mass scale, new candidate states fit in current LQCD projections
N(1675)5/2-
N(1700)3/2-
N(1520)3/2-
N(1650)1/2-
N(1535)1/2-
![Page 9: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Σ for γp → nπ+
60 1200 60 1200
DU12CM12MAIDBbGa
M. Dugger et al.
![Page 10: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Σ for γ p → p π0 DU12CM12MAIDBbGa
M. Dugger et al.
![Page 11: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Changes in couplingsSolution A1/2 A3/2
D(1700)3/2- DU12 132 ± 5 108 ± 5
CM12 105 ± 5 92 ± 4
BnGa 170 ± 20 170 ± 25
MD07 226 210
PDG12 104 ± 15 85 ± 22
D(1905)5/2+ DU12 20 ± 2 -49 ± 5
CM12 19 ± 2 -38 ± 4
BnGa 25 ± 5 -49 ± 4
MD07 18 -28
PDG12 26 ± 11 -45 ± 20
![Page 12: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
T for γ p → n π+
(new)
(new)
(new)
![Page 13: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
F for γ p → n π+
• Agreement with predictions get much worse at higher energies
• SAID13 are predictions based on preliminary fits to CLAS pion Σ measurements
(new) (new)
(new)
![Page 14: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
E for γ p → p π0
• Early stage results• Predictions agree better
at lower energies
(new)
Cos(θπc.m.)
![Page 15: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Summary of meson photoproduction σ Σ T P E F G H Tx Tz Lx Lz Ox Oz Cx Cz
Proton target
pπ0 ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
nπ+ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
pη ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
pη’ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
K+Λ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔
K+Σ0 ✔ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔
K0*Σ+ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
“Neutron” target
pπ- ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
K+Σ- ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
K0Λ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
K0Σ0 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✔ - published ✔ - acquired
![Page 16: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
N* states in γp pω pπ➝ ➝ +π-π0 ?
M. Williams, et al. (CLAS), Phys. Rev. C80:065209, 2009
W=1.7 – 2.4 GeV, ΔW=10 MeV bins
• Very precise cross sections in W, cosθω. From ω decays => SDME ρ0
00,
ρ01-1, ρ0
10, shown in blue - blue shades.
(ω data not yet included in coupled-channel amplitude analyses, in preparation by several groups.)
![Page 17: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The data are used as input to a single channel event-based, energy independent partial wave analysis (the first ever for baryons).
ω photoproduction is dominated by the well known F15(1680) and G17(2190), and the “missing” ** F15(2000).
N* states in γp pω pπ➝ ➝ +π-π0
M. Williams, et al. (CLAS) , Phys.Rev. C80 (2009) 065208
F15(2000)/G17(2190)
![Page 18: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Differential cross sections γp pφFirst precision measurement in 80 energy bins at W=10 MeV, and nearly full angle range (CLAS).
φ K+K- φ K0sK0
l
• SDME from φ decay angular distributions.
![Page 19: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
The L=1 QM assignmentsFrom Klempt and Richard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010).
Note: x = “missing” state (not seen in experiments)
![Page 20: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
The L=2 QM assignmentsFrom Klempt and Richard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010).
Note: x = “missing” state (not seen in experiments)
Some of these are 2-star PDG
Unknown!
![Page 21: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
The L=3 QM assignmentsFrom Klempt and Richard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010).
Note: x = “missing” state (not seen in experiments).Half of these are 2-star = evidence is only “fair”.
![Page 22: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
K*Y Photoproduction
• The following work is done primarily by the Ohio group at CLAS:– Wei Tang and KH.
![Page 23: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Moorhouse Selection Rule• The transition
amplitudes for gp to all [70,48] are zero.
• For gn, these transitions are allowed, e.g. the N5/2-(1675).
N3/2-
N5/2-
Data from N. Bianchi et al., PRC 54 (1996).
N1/2+
![Page 24: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Lambda Selection Rule
• The [70,48] resonances decouple from the KL and K*L channels.– This assumes the spectator approximation, where
the [ud] quarks are coupled to s=0 in the L.– In the [70,48] N*’s, the [ud] are coupled to s=1.– The selection rule applies to both p and n targets.– This doesn’t apply to KS and K*S final states.
• A study of KL, K*L, KS and K*S final states will test this spectator (diquark) hypothesis.
Reference: Q. Zhao and F.E. Close, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 094014.
![Page 25: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Theoretical models for the K* photoproduction 1. Isobar models:evaluate tree-level Feynman diagrams that include resonant and non-resonant exchanges of baryons and mesons.
Advantage: Identify the dominant contributions to the final statesDisadvantage:Too many parameters, tuning and fixing of those parameters sometimes are tricky.
To describe the physics process completely, all possible Feynman diagrams that could lead to the final state are required to be taken into account in the calculation.
Mandelstam variables:
From: Wei Tang, Ph.D. Dissertation Defense, August, 2012
![Page 26: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
2. Regge-ized models:
Rather than focus on selecting of all possible s, t and u channel reaction processes, the reggeized models emphasis the t-channel.The standard propagators in the Lagrangian are replaced by Regge propagators.
Sho Ozaki, http://ific.uv.es/nucth/chirall10/talks/ozaki.pdf
Originally applied to high energy hadron reactions
Might not be able to produce the results in detail, but at least it can tell us about how t-channel mesons exchanges affects the reaction
From: Wei Tang, Ph.D. Dissertation Defense, August, 2012
![Page 27: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
K*+L Differential Cross Sections
Curves are simple fits using 4th order Legendra polynomials.
![Page 28: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
K*+S0 Differential Cross Sections
![Page 29: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Total Cross Sections
Both data peak at about W=2.25 GeV. There are 3 well-known N*’s there: the N7/2-(2190), N9/2-(2250) and N9/2+(2250).Note: the N9/2- is part of the L-forbidden [70,48] multiplet.
![Page 30: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Comparison with theoryCyan: Oh and Kim (O-K) Isobar ModelBlue: Kim, Nam, Oh, Kim (KNOK) Regge ModelDotted curves include additional s-channel N* with M<2.2 GeV and L<3.
Clearly, the currently available theoretical models cannot reproduce the data. This suggests that higher-mass and higher-L resonances are needed.
![Page 31: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Ratio of K*0S/K*+L and k-meson
Solid: mostly t-channel k-mesonDotted: very little k-meson
There is scarce evidence for the strange scalar called the kappa (k), which is the octet partner of the a0(980) and f0(980) mesons. The CLAS data support an earlier claim by LEPS that also measured K*0S+ photoproduction.
![Page 32: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
KY* Photoproduction
• The following work is done primarily by the Carnegie-Mellon University group at CLAS:– Kei Moriya and Reinhard Schumacher.
![Page 33: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Detect K+pp-(p0) or K+p+p-(n)
L(1405)
S(1385)
S(1385) has small branching ratiointo the L(1405) state we want
L(1520)
![Page 34: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Events in K+S+p- Final State
Note K* overlap: must be subtracted in some W bins
![Page 35: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Differential S0(1385) Cross Section
• g + p K+ + S0 (1385)• Experiment: see t-channel-
like forward peaking & u-channel backward rise– Agreement with LEPS
• Theory by Oh et al.1: contact term dominant; included four high-mass N* and D resonances– Prediction was fitted to
preliminary CLAS total cross section
1. Y. Oh, C. M. Ko, K. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. C 77, 045204 (2008). .cos c m
K
![Page 36: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
g + p K+ + L(1520) Good agreement among Sp decay modes Corrected with 42% branching fraction to Sp
Differential L(1520) Cross Section
2.05<W<2.15 GeV
Agreement between S+p- decay modes: tests acceptance consistency
Agreement among S+p-, S0p0, S-p+
decay modes: tests acceptance consistency
2.45<W<2.55 GeV
![Page 37: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Differential L(1520) Cross Section g + p K+ + L (1520) Experiment: see t-channel-
like forward peaking & u-channel backward rise Agreement with LEPS1,2
Theories: Nam & Kao3: contact term
dominant; no K* or u-channel exchanges
He & Chen4: K* and N(2080)D13 JP=3/2- added
. .cos c m
K
1. H. Kohri et al. (LEPS) Phys Rev Lett 104, 172001 (2010)2. N. Muramatsu et al. (LEPS) Phys Rev 103, 012001 (2009)3. S.I. Nam & C.W. Kao, Phys. Rev. C 81, 055206 (2010)4. J. He & X.R. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 86, 035204 (2012)
![Page 38: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Differential L(1405) Cross Section g + p K+ + L (1405)
Experiment: each S pchannel yields a different cross section (! Not expected1 !)
Indication of isospin interference in (1405)L mass region Threshold < m Sp < 1.50 GeV
. .cos c m
K
1. K. Moriya, R. A. Schumacher et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 035206 (2013)
![Page 39: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Differential L(1405) Cross Section g + p K+ + L (1405) Experiment: first-ever
measurements See t-channel-like forward
peaking & u-channel backward rise at high W Same as other hyperons
See very different behavior at low W Charge channels differ
Channels merge together at high W
. .cos c m
K
![Page 40: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Differential L(1405) Cross Section g + p K+ + L (1405) Sum three Sp decay modes
“total” differ-ential cross section Mixed agreement with LEPS
data1
Theories: Nam et al.2: s-channel Born term
dominant ; K* exchange for 3 values of g K*NL*
Williams, Ji, Cotanch3: crossing and duality contraints; no N*, estimated g KNL*
1. M. Niiyama et al. (LEPS) Phys Rev C78, 035202 (2008)2. S.I. Nam et al., J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 59, 2676 (2011)3. R. Williams et al., Phys. Rev. C43, 452 (1991)
Nam
Williams
. .cos c m
K
![Page 41: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Direct Y* Cross Section Comparison
. .cos c m
K
g + p K+ + Y* Sum L(1405) channels Apply branching fractions for
(1520), (1385)L S
All three hyperons have Strong forward peaking Similar t-slopes Back-angle rises Similar-size cross sections
(1115)LS0(1193)S0(1385)(1405)L(1520)L
![Page 42: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
(1115)LS0(1193)S0(1385)(1405)L(1520)L
Direct Y* Cross Section Comparison
g + p K+ + Y* (showing spline fits)
All three have Near- threshold peaking Similar size cross sections Sp-fraction (42%) of
(1520)L has same cross section as (1405)L at high W!
L*’s have a hint of second peak/plateau
-0.2 < cos QK c.m. < +0.1
-0.7 < cos QK c.m. < -0.5
+0.6 < cos QK c.m. < +0.9
![Page 43: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Total Cross Section Comparison
(1115)LS0(1193)S0(1385)(1405)L(1520)L
1. R. Bradford et al. (CLAS) Phys. Rev. C 73, 035202 (2006)
g + p K+ + Y(*)
All three Y*s have similar total cross sections Ground states L and S0 are comparable to Y* in size1
![Page 44: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Dark Photon Search
• The following work is done primarily by the ODU group at CLAS:– M. Kunkel and M. Amaryan
![Page 45: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
![Page 46: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
![Page 47: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
![Page 48: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
![Page 49: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
![Page 50: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Summary
• Precise data from CLAS has contributed to identification of new baryon resonances.– Complete set of spin observables for PS mesons.
• New data from K*Y and KY* will likely help to identify new high-mass baryon resonances.– PWA for these data are in progress.
• Search for dark photons possible at CLAS using the high statistics data set.– Better limits on parameter space.
![Page 51: Recent Results from CLAS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813300550346895d99be9e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51R. A. Schumacher, Carnegie Mellon University 51
The Low-Mass S=-1 Hyperons
(1115)
Energ
y (
Mass
) M
eV
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
(1670)
…
(1670)
…
NK
(1385)
Mass thresholds:
1525
1432
1390
1331
Isospin = 0 Isospin = 1
(1405)L
(1520)L
(1385)S
(1192)