recommendations regarding the greene county...
TRANSCRIPT
The oldest part of the Greene County jail was built in 1905 and is the second oldest in the state
Does NOT meet current standards for correctional facilities and the County has been dealing with structural and operational challenges for many years
Various committees and task forces have been
convened to study the issue intermittently since 2004 State Commission of Corrections (SCOC) has, over
time, identified structural and administrative deficits that the County is mandated to address • Operating under variances for policy violations • Beds have been decertified so boarding out inmates to
Columbia County
Build a new COUNTY JAIL adjacent to Greene and Coxsackie STATE PRISONS on Route 9W in Coxsackie
67,000 square foot JAIL with a 126 bed capacity and
potential 148 bed capacity through double-bunking
Additional 17,000 square foot Sheriff’s Office
$52 million capital cost to be paid through 30 year municipal bond (approximately $81 million total debt service)
Public and Legislative reaction led to a decision to reevaluate
Established by the Legislature in April Met every two weeks for four months
Chair – Lori Torgersen, PhD
• Legislator
• Retired Judge, District Attorney, Director of Probation,
Public Defender, Defense Attorney
• Director of Mental Heath, Director of Substance Abuse
Treatment
• ATI Program Specialist
• Public Representative
1) How big should the jail be?
2) How can we most cost-effectively house
the inmate population?
3) How can we sustain a reduced jail
population in the future?
Ricci Greene analysis of 2015 data was the
basis for the preliminary proposal
ATI Committee expanded data analysis
• Updated historical data and revisited trends
• Obtained and examined Jail Management System
Data – every “booking” from 2004-2016
Utilized committee experience to evaluate
trends and project current and future needs
5/10/2004 through 12/31/2016
• 9,178 bookings
• 5,229 individual people
Min age – 16, Max age – 90, Mean age - 40
Females
20%
White
77%
Black
16%
Other 7%
Males
80%
1702 of 5229 individuals (33%) booked into
jail between 2004-2016 came back to jail at
least one time
• Max number of bookings for one person -18
62% of the bookings by this 33% of the
people
• Small # of people driving up the cost
• “Frequent flyers” - need to break the cycle
25756
40861
48195
47019
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
19
20
19
30
19
40
19
50
19
60
19
70
19
80
19
90
20
00
20
10
20
15
20
16
20
17
Source: US Census Bureau 1920-2016 and DCJS/FBI Data estimate for 2017
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Property crime
Violent crime
Source: NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Misdemeanor arrests
Felony arrests
Source: NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services
730
914
651
536
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: Greene County Jail
62 68
78 79
71
85
72 76
60
42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
through
9/25
Source: Greene County Jail
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
through
9/25
Ricci Greene Report Actual/Current Jail Data
Source: Greene County Jail and Ricci Greene Report
49 52
62 60
55
61
56
52
45
13 14 16
20
16
24
16
24
15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Males
Females
Source: Greene County Jail
31
26
33
29
34 32
35 35
44
39
45
42
29
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
through
9/26
2017 ADP (as of 9/25) is 42 • Again, includes boarded population
• Again, no concurrent increase in crime
Why the decline? • Informal use of ATI
Conscious effort by CJ system to only incarcerate
those who need to be
• Formal use of ATI
Drug Court
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
• Opening capacity of 126 (expandable to 148)
Two male pods - each 38 beds (expandable to 46)
One female pod - 32 beds (expandable to 38)
Pre-classification/Special Risk section - 18 beds
ATI RECOMMENDATION
• Opening capacity of 66 (78 with double bunking)
One male pod - 38 beds (expandable to 46)
One female pod - 16 beds (expandable to 20)
Pre-classification/Special Risk section - 12 beds
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
ATI proposal
Original proposal
Source: Greene County Jail
Max capacity is 86% above 2017 ADP
All indicators are down or flat
Answer is NOT to move the line up, but to
drive the curve down
• Invest in less expensive ATI alternatives
• Can board out on rare occasions to
accommodate spikes
What impact does the reduced capacity
have on overall space requirements?
• Inmate housing computed by cell floor space.
Single - 80 sqft
Double-bunk – 100 sqft
• Common spaces
If population reduced by 50%, common spaces by 20%
What’s the most fiscally responsible way
to meet these capacity needs?
Three options
• 1) Coxsackie
• 2) Catskill
• 3) Greene/Columbia
Locate at Coxsackie site
• Reduce opening beds from 126 to 66
• Reduce max from 148 to 78 inmates
Approximately 21,000 sqft reduction
• Save 22.5% of total building construction budget
• Save $11.6 million of $51.7 million budget
Advantages Room for future expansion
Disadvantages Cost of transportation to court
Accessibility to home/family and treatment providers
Catskill is primary source of inmates
Build new on current 19k sqft jail site
Same floor space as in Coxsackie
3 story jail @ ~16k sqft/floor
Basement parking
Rooftop exercise yard
Advantages • $5.6 million cost savings (Infrastructure)
• No transportation costs to County Court
• Accessible to home/family and treatment
providers
• Multi-story is usually lower construction cost per
sqft
• Options
4th floor - new Sheriff’s office
Adjacent lots on Broad St.
Disadvantages • Limited room for future expansion
• Need to board out inmates during construction
• Transportation costs for 1.5 years
• Multiple floors – more CO escorts?
• Entryway for vehicles
Do not build a new jail
• Share services with Columbia County and
house inmates at jointly operated jail
Negotiated long-term rate (MOU/contract)
Integration of Greene and Columbia CO’s
Invest in ATI solutions in Greene
County Possible profit center
$5.16 million
Personal Service
$2,417,830
Employee Benefits
$1,331,401
Equip/Vehicles $49,500
Boarding Prisoners $875,000
Contractual Expenses $484,836
At an ADP
of 42 that’s
$337 per
person per
day
$8.01 million
Personal Service
$2,881,193
Employee Benefits
$1,527,412 Equipment/
Vehicles $55,000
Contractual Expenses $946,400
Debt Service $2,600,000
Advantages • Save construction capital costs $500,000 to raze existing jail
• Lower annual budget costs
• Potential NYS cost-sharing funds
• Available sooner than a new facility
Disadvantages
• Cost of transportation to Greene County court
• Less accessible to home/family
• CO’s transfer to Columbia County
• Less “control” over costs (i.e. medical ~170k)
1) Coxsackie – Capital Cost ($40.1million)
2) Catskill – Capital Cost ($34.5 million)
3) Greene/Columbia – Capital Cost ($500,000)
WHATEVER choice you make…
• Run it like a business
• Track data, focus on opportunities
• Make use of low-cost ATI alternatives
• Use boarding to accommodate peak loads
Most people do not reoffend:
only ~1/3 of detained population are
“frequent flyers” – repeat jail bookings
Many struggle with treatable issues:
Drugs/Alcohol drive crime: 23% of new
crime bookings; up to at least 50% with
drug-related probation violations
People addicted to…
…more likely to be
addicted to heroin
Crosses class, gender,
and age. White males
age 18-25 are
particularly high-risk
Greene Co. has
3rd highest OD
rate in NYS
Most common response: incarceration
without treatment • Often worsens social isolation, trauma, economic
poverty that drives addiction and crime
• Average total cost per booking = $13,143
Impact of ATI: Greene County Drug Court • Avoid incarceration costs ($337/day/person)
• High program success rates (77%)
• Participants are able to break addiction cycle
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
Recommendation 1A:
Fully implement the Crisis Intervention Training
(CIT) working group recommendations
Recommendation 1B:
Invest in a detox/crisis stabilization center for
alternative placements
Reduced rates of injuries for officers
• The San Jose (Calif.) CIT program reported a
32% decrease in officer injuries
Greater access to care for mentally ill
• The Memphis (Tenn.) CIT program reported a
42% increase in referrals by law enforcement
officers to psychiatric emergency services
Recommendation 1A: Fully implement the CIT working group recommendations Recommendation 1B: Invest in a detox/crisis stabilization center for alternative placements Recommendation 1C: Explore collaborating with Albany County to implement the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program
Rearrest rates (6 months after program completion)
• LEAD: 58% Control Group: 80%
System Utilization • 1.4 fewer jail bookings
• 39 fewer days in jail
• 87 percent lower odds of at least one prison
incarceration subsequent to evaluation entry.
Resulting Cost Savings: $8,061 per person
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
Recommendation 2A:
Re-establish pre-trial release program that
expands conditional release options for judges
Agreement between Court and accused
Allows conditional release in pre-trial phase
with supervision by probation department
Risk assessments can determine eligibility;
Violation(s) of terms may lead to detention
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
Recommendation 3A:
Establish a Case Management System that
facilitates timely case resolution
Case Manager position
Individual evaluations of needs
Cross-system database for information
sharing purposes
Recommendation 3B:
Expand defender-based advocacy and case
management services through contract with
Center for Community Alternatives (CCA)
Cost to county subsidized by NYS DCJS
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
Recommendation 4A:
Invest in a transitional/alternative housing
model for high-need people
Small, scatter-site model that integrates
supervision with treatment
Increase community safety
• No midnight drop-offs from jail to the street
• Last 3 reported deaths by MCAT were people
released from hospital to “homeless” status
Recommendation 4B:
Provide robust mental health and substance
abuse treatment in jail and post-release with
holistic support
Vivitrol program in jail underway
Supported by $1.1M SAMHSA grant
Recommendation 4C:
Increase treatment retention by investing in
peer support navigators and providing
support to families of justice-involved people
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
Recommendation 5A: Legislative commitment to developing ATI’s as a long-term cost saving measure that will improve the health and safety of Greene County residents Recommendation 5B: Establish a coordinating committee to support the implementation process and track progress/make updates as needed Recommendation 5C: Work with state officials to identify policy and funding opportunities to support our efforts
1. Create alternative law enforcement responses to low-level crimes/people in crisis
2. Prioritize community-based supervision for lower-risk pre-trial population
3. Use strong defender advocacy and case management to connect people in jail to needed treatment in a timely manner
4. Strengthen treatment & services that reduce recidivism and support addiction recovery
5. Build system-level accountability for results
1. Explore private/state/federal funding (available throughout the country)
2. Implement with existing probation resources
3. Hire case management position; CCA contract funded by DCJS; invest in alternative housing
4. Leverage SAMHSA grant; Hire peer & family support navigators
5. Hire criminal justice coordinator position
TOTAL INITIAL INVESTMENT: $330,000
CURRENT ANNUAL JAIL EXPENDITURES: $5,160,000
The Greene County Jail population has
fallen dramatically
No data predict a rise in that population
A jail with a maximum capacity of 78
inmates should meet our needs
There are three alternatives to
incarcerating a population that size
Reasonable estimates of capital costs
associated with each are (approximately):
1) Coxsackie – $40million
2) Catskill – $35 million
3) Greene/Columbia –$500,000
The best way to ensure that the jail is large
enough is by creating alternatives to
incarceration
• The criminal justice system has control
• Divert low-risk people at an operational cost far
less than incarceration ($337 per person/per day)