reconstruction, 1865–1877. presidential reconstruction lincoln’s approach the constitution did...

69
Reconstruction, 1865–1877

Upload: ezra-gibson

Post on 16-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Reconstruction, 1865–1877

Page 2: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Presidential Reconstruction• Lincoln’s Approach

• The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure for Reconstruction, so it did not say which branch of government was to handle the readmission of rebellious states.

• Lincoln offered general amnesty to all but high-ranking Confederates willing to pledge loyalty to the Union; when 10 percent of a state’s voters took this oath—and abolished slavery—the state would be restored to the Union.

Page 3: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Most Confederate states rebuffed the offer, assuring that the war would have to be fought to the bitter end.

• As some African Americans began to agitate for political rights, congressional Republicans proposed the Wade-Davis Bill, a stricter substitute for Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan, which laid down as conditions for the restoration of the rebellious states to the union.

Page 4: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The Wade-Davis Bill served notice that congressional Republicans were not going to turn Reconstruction policy over to the president.

• Rather than openly challenge Congress, Lincoln executed a pocket veto of the Wade-Davis Bill by not signing it before Congress adjourned.

• Lincoln also initiated informal talks with congressional leaders aimed at finding common ground; Lincoln’s successor Andrew Johnson, however, held the view that Reconstruction was the president’s prerogative.

Page 5: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

How might Reconstruction have been different if Lincoln had not been

assassinated?

• Lincoln would have allied himself with the moderate Republicans in support of a program less lenient than what he initially wanted but not as severe as what the Radicals desired.

• Reconstruction would have been more consistent, without changes in policy. Southerners would not have been encouraged by battles between the president and Congress, which would not have occurred.

Page 6: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Lincoln would have broken with congressional Republicans and would have had struggles with Congress similar to Johnson’s, although with less personal hostility because of Lincoln’s more tactful personality.

• Lincoln would have remained committed to full citizenship for ex-slaves; he would not have backed down before the Ku Klux Klan and would have used the force necessary to root it out. He could have co-opted Lee and other southerners with genuine honor to help him rebuild the Union

Page 7: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure
Page 8: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Presidential ReconstructionJohnson Seizes the Initiative

• A slave owner himself, he had little sympathy for formerly enslaved blacks.

• The Republicans had nominated Johnson for vice president in 1864 in order to promote wartime political unity and to court southern Unionists.

• After Lincoln’s death, Johnson offered amnesty to all southerners except high ranking Confederate officials and wealthy property owners who took an oath of allegiance to the Constitution.

Page 9: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Johnson also appointed provisional governors for the southern states and, as conditions for their restoration, required only that they revoke their ordinances of secession, repudiate their Confederate debts, and ratify the Thirteenth Amendment.

• Within months, all the former Confederate states had met Johnson’s requirements for rejoining the Union and had functioning, elected governments.

Page 10: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Presidential ReconstructionJohnson Seizes the Initiative

• Within months, all the former Confederate states had met Johnson’s requirements for rejoining the Union and had functioning, elected governments.

• Southerners held fast to the antebellum order and enacted Black Codes designed to drive the ex-slaves back to plantations; they had moved to restore slavery in all but name.

• Southerners perceived Johnson’s liberal amnesty policy as tacit approval of the Black Codes; emboldened, the ex-Confederates filled southern congressional delegations with old comrades, even including the vice president of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens.

Page 11: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Republicans in both houses refused to admit the southern delegations when Congress convened in early December 1865, blocking Johnson’s Reconstruction program.

• In response, some Black Codes were replaced with nonracial ordinances whose effect was the same, and across the South a wave of violence erupted against the freedmen.

• Republicans concluded that the South had embarked on a concerted effort to circumvent the Thirteenth Amendment and that the federal government had to intervene.

• Congress voted to extend the life of the Freedmen’s Bureau, gave it direct funding for the first time, and authorized its agents to investigate cases of discrimination against blacks.

• Lyman Trumbull, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, proposed a Civil Rights Bill that declared all persons—regardless of race—born in the United States to be citizens and gave them equal rights.

• Even the most moderate Republicans demanded that the federal government assume responsibility for securing the civil rights of the freedmen.

Page 12: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Presidential ReconstructionActing on Freedom

• Across the South, ex-slaves held mass meetings and formed organizations; they demanded equality before the law and the right to vote.

• In the months before the end of the war, freedmen had seized control of land where they could; General Sherman had reserved tracts of land for liberated blacks in his March to the Sea.

• When the war ended, the Freedmen’s Bureau was charged with feeding and clothing war refugees, distributing confiscated lands to “loyal refugees and freedmen,” and regulating labor contracts between freedmen and planters.

• Johnson’s amnesty plan entitled pardoned Confederates to recover confiscated property, battering the freedmen’s hopes of keeping the land on which they lived.

Page 13: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• To try to hold onto their land, blacks fought pitched battles with plantation owners and bands of ex-Confederate soldiers; generally the whites prevailed.

• A struggle took place over the labor system that would replace slavery; because owning land defined true freedom, ex-slaves resisted working for wages as it implied not freedom, but dependency.

• To overcome any vestiges of dependency, formalizing marriage was an urgent matter after emancipation as was resisting planters’ demands that freedwomen go back to work in the fields.

• Many freed people abandoned their old plantations in order to seek better lives and more freedom in the cities of the South; those who remained refused to work under the gang-labor system.

• Whatever system of labor finally might emerge, it was clear that the freedmen would never settle for anything resembling the old plantation system.

Page 14: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The efforts of former slaves to control their own lives challenged deeply entrenched white attitudes and resulted in racial violence; the governments established under Johnson’s plan only put the stamp of legality on the pervasive efforts to enforce white supremacy.

Freedmen turned to Washington for help.

We Need to understand their dilemma

Page 15: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The average ex-slave, freed by the war and the 13th Amendment, was to a degree childlike. Life under the lash had unfortunately left him immature-socially, politically, emotionally.

Page 16: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

De mass a run, ha! Ha!

De darky stay, ho! Ho!

It must be now dat de kingdom am a-comin'

And de year of jubalo.

Page 17: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

"Black Codes" in the "Black Belt"

The crushed Cotton Kingdom could not rise from its weeds until the fields were once more put under the plow and hoe. This goal could not be attained without a dependable labor supply, which the now-restless black was not providing.

Page 18: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The so-called "Black Codes" were the answer of the white legisla tures in the South to the problem of a stable laboring force. The pre -Civil War laws governing enslaved Negroes were no longer binding, and substitute statutes had to be enacted. The new codes were naturally more liberal than the old ones, but they were not liberal enough in the eyes of Northern anti-slaveryites and many forward-looking Southerners

Page 19: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure
Page 20: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Titled "Selling a Freeman to Pay His Fine at Monticello, Florida,” this 1867 drawing from a northern magazine equates the black codes with the reinstitution of slavery. The laws stopped short of re-enslavement but sharply restricted blacks' freedom. In Florida, as in other southern states, certain acts, such as breaking a labor contract, were made criminal offenses, the penalty for which could be involuntary plantation labor for a year. Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1866 and ratified the 14th Amendment to the Constitution (protecting the rights of blacks) in 1868 to combat the black codes.

Page 21: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Presidential ReconstructionCongress versus President

• In February 1866, Andrew Johnson vetoed the Freedmen’s Bureau Bill and a month later vetoed Trumbull’s Civil Rights Bill calling it discriminatory against whites.

• Galvanized by Johnson’s attack on the Civil Rights Bill, Republicans enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1866; Congress had never before overridden a veto on a major piece of legislation.

• As an angry Congress renewed the Freedmen’s Bureau over a second Johnson veto, Republican resolve was reinforced by news of mounting violence in the South.

• Republicans moved to enshrine black civil rights in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

• Johnson urged the states not to ratify the amendment and began to maneuver politically against the Republicans; the Fourteenth Amendment became a campaign issue for the Democratic Party.

• Republicans responded furiously by decrying Democrats as traitors, a tactic that came to be known as “waving the bloody shirt.”

Page 22: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Johnson embarked on a disastrous railroad tour campaign and made matters worse by engaging in shouting matches and exchanging insults with the hostile crowds.

• Republicans won a three-to-one majority in the 1866 congressional elections, which registered

• overwhelming support for securing the civil rights of ex-slaves.

• The Republican Party had a new sense of unity coalescing around the unbending program of the radical minority, which represented the party’s abolitionist strain.

• For the Radicals, Reconstruction was never primarily about restoring the Union but rather remaking southern society, beginning with getting the black man his right to vote.

Page 23: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Radical ReconstructionCongress Takes Command

The Reconstruction Act of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, each under the command of a Union general

Page 24: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

What do the dates that southern states were readmitted to the Union and the years that Radical Reconstruction governments were defeated in the South tell us about the success or failure of Reconstruction between 1867 and 1877?

Page 25: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The price for reentering the Union was granting the vote to the freedmen and disenfranchising the South’s prewar political class.

• Congress overrode Johnson’s veto of the Reconstruction Act and, in effect, attempted to reconstruct the presidency with the Tenure of Office Act, by requiring Senate consent for the removal of any official whose appointment had required Senate confirmation and the president to issue all orders to the army through its commanding general.

• After Congress adjourned in August 1867, Johnson “suspended” Edwin M. Stanton and replaced him with General Ulysses S. Grant; he then replaced four of the commanding generals governing the South.

• When the Senate reconvened, it overruled Stanton’s suspension, and Grant, now Johnson’s enemy, resigned so that Stanton could resume office.

• On February 21, 1868, Johnson dismissed Stanton; the House Republicans introduced articles of impeachment against Johnson, mainly for violations of the Tenure of Office Act.

• A vote on impeachment was one vote short of the required two-thirds majority needed, but Johnson was left powerless to alter the course of Reconstruction.

Page 26: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

How would American political development have differed if President Johnson had been removed from office?

• Reconstruction would not have changed much, since Congress took control of policy anyway, and the North was ambivalent.

• Impeachment and conviction would have occurred more often in American history because they would have resulted from a lack of political support, not from criminal activity.

• Congress’s power would have increased even more than it did in the late nineteenth century.

• Grant was the Republicans’ 1868 presidential nominee, and he won out over the Democrats’ Horatio Seymour; Republicans retained two-thirds majorities in both houses of Congress.

• The Fifteenth Amendment forbade either the federal government or the states to deny citizens the right to vote on the basis of race, color, or “previous condition of servitude,” although it left room fr poll taxes and property or literacy tests. o

• States still under federal control were required to ratify the amendment before being readmitted to the Union; the Fifteenth Amendment became part of the Constitution.

Page 27: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Radical ReconstructionWoman Suffrage Denied

• Women’s rights advocates were outraged that the Fifteenth Amendment did not address women’s suffrage.

• At the 1869 annual meeting of the Equal Rights Association, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony spoke out against the amendment.

• The majority, led by Lucy Stone and Julia Ward Howe of the American Women’s Suffrage Association, accepted the priority of black suffrage over women’s suffrage.

• Stanton’s new organization, the National Women’s Suffrage Association, accepted only women, focused exclusively on women’s rights, and took up the battle for a federal woman suffrage amendment.

• Fracturing of the women’s movement obscured the common ground of the two sides, but the issues raised during radical Reconstruction planted the seeds of the modern feminist movement.

Page 28: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

By 1872, when this cartoon appeared in Harper's Weekly magazine, suffragist Victoria Woodhull had gained considerable notoriety both for her dramatic pro-suffrage testimony before a congressional committee and for her bold critiques of sexual hypocrisy within the marriage relationship. Her proclamations and behavior won her the label of America's foremost "free lover." This image, created by the great nineteenth-century political cartoonist Thomas Nast, portrays her as the devil incarnate. He contrasts Woodhull to a heavily burdened drunkard's wife, who will be further weighted down by following her lead.

Page 29: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Radical ReconstructionRepublican Rule in the South

• Between 1868 and 1871, all the southern states met the congressional stipulations and rejoined the Union.

• Southern white Republicans were called “scalawags” by Democratic ex-Confederates; white northerners who moved to the South were called “carpetbaggers.”

Page 30: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Some scalawags were former slave owners who wanted to attract northern capital, but most were yeoman farmers who wanted to rid the South of its slaveholding aristocracy; some carpetbaggers were motivated by personal profit and brought capital and skills with them, while others were attracted to the South’s climate, people, and economic opportunities.

• Although never proportionate to their size in population, black officeholders were prominent throughout the South.

Page 31: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Republicans modernized state constitutions, eliminated property qualifications for voting, got rid of the Black Codes, and expanded the rights of married women.

• Reconstruction social programs called for hospitals, more humane penitentiaries, and asylums; Reconstruction governments built roads and revived the railroad network.

• To pay for their programs, Republicans introduced property taxes that applied to personal wealth as well as to real estate, similar to the taxes the Jacksonians had used in the North.

Page 32: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• In many plantation counties, former slaves served as tax assessors and collectors, administering the taxation of their onetime owners.

• Reconstruction governments’ debts mounted rapidly, and public credit collapsed; much of the spending was wasted or ended up in the pockets of state officials.

• Republican state governments viewed education as the foundation of a democratic order and had to make up for lost time since the South had virtually no public education.

Page 33: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• New African American churches served as schools, social centers, and political meeting halls as well as places of worship.

• Black ministers were community leaders and often political officeholders; they provided a powerful religious underpinning for the Republican politics of their congregations.

Page 34: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure
Page 35: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Radical ReconstructionThe Quest for Land

• The Southern Homestead Act of 1866 was mostly symbolic since the public land it made available to former slaves was in swampy, infertile parts of the lower South.

• After Johnson’s order restoring confiscated lands to the ex-Confederates, the Freedmen’s Bureau devoted itself to teaching blacks how to be good agricultural laborers.

• Sharecropping was a distinctive labor system for cotton agriculture in which the freedmen worked as tenant farmers, exchanging their labor for the use of land.

Page 36: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Sharecropping was an unequal relationship, since the sharecropper had no way of making it through the first growing season without borrowing for food and supplies.

• Storekeepers “furnished” the sharecropper and took as collateral a lien on the crop; as cotton prices declined during the 1870s, many sharecroppers fell into permanent debt.

Page 37: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• If the merchant was also the landowner, the debt became a pretext for peonage, or forced labor.

• Sharecropping did mobilize black husbands and wives in common enterprise and shielded both from personal subordination to whites.

• By the end of Reconstruction, about one quarter of sharecropping families saved enough to rent with cash, and eventually black farmers owned about a third of the land they farmed.

Page 38: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The battle over the South’s land was exceptional due to politics; elsewhere, emancipation rarely meant civil or political equality for freed slaves, but in the United States, the civil rights, suffrage, and measure of political power for freedmen allowed the development of sharecropping.

• While sharecropping beat laboring for their former slave owners, it was devastating to Southern agriculture; it committed the South inflexibly to cotton because it was a cash crop and limited incentives for agricultural improvements.

Page 39: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• It went too far. The attempt to give African Americans political equality with white southerners was fruitless. It could not, and did not, last.

• It did not go far enough. Land redistribution alone would have made a difference in the political and economic relationship between white southerners and freedmen.

• It was an impossible task. The North was never prepared to support the extent of change that was necessary in the South.

Page 40: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• African Americans who had been free before the war were more conservative in their goals for Reconstruction and were more protective of private property.

• Freedmen often sought the confiscation and redistribution of former Confederate estates.

• Freedmen enjoyed their new geographical mobility, often seeking out relatives who had been sold away.

Page 41: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Planters successfully appealed to white racism in order to prevent such an alliance.

• Freedmen and poor whites were in competition for land in the distressed southern economy after the war.

• Both groups distrusted each other and could not overcome latent racism.

Page 42: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The Undoing of Reconstruction• Counterrevolution

• The Acquiescent North

• The Political Crisis of 1877

Page 43: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

COUNTERREVOLUTION

• One by one, the Reconstruction state governments fell to counterrevolutions

• Could greater effort and commitment in Washington have saved the Republicans?

Page 44: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Hearings on the Ku Klux Klan

• Testimony Taken by the Joint Committee to Enquire into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States

Page 45: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Public debt of the Southern states doubled and trebled

• Disfranchised and propertied whites had to stagger along under a tax burden that sometimes rose ten or fifteen fold

Page 46: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Corruption was also rampant in the North

Tweed Ring of New York City

Page 47: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The Rule of Night Riders• Ku Klux Klan, founded in Tennessee in 1866 its

main purpose was to resist Reconstruction, and it focused as much on intimidating "carpetbaggers" and "scalawags" as on putting down the freed slaves.

• A former slave trader and plantation owner who

lost all his wealth in the Civil War, Forrest was the tough, respected figure who could impose order on the Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan and prevent it from spinning out of control. In late 1866, he accepted the job and donned the robes of Grand Wizard, the Klan's highest office. For him, the Klan was politics by other means, the vehicle by which disfranchised former Confederates like himself might strike a blow against the despised Republicans who now ran the South

Page 48: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• By 1870 the Klan was operating almost everywhere in the South as an armed force whose terrorist tactics served the Democratic Party

Page 49: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Striking fear in the hearts of its enemies was a favorite tactic of Forrest's Ku Klux Klan-- hence this menacing ceremonial flag from Tennessee, with its fierce dragon and mysterious Latin motto, "Because it always is, because it is everywhere, because it is abominable."

Page 50: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The KKK quickly adopted violent methods. A rapid reaction set in, with the Klan's leadership disowning violence and Southern elites seeing the Klan as an excuse for federal troops to continue their activities in the South. The organization was in decline from 1868 to 1870 and was destroyed in the early 1870s by President Ulysses S. Grant's vigorous action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act).

Page 51: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

Two armed Klansmen pose in their disguises, which they donned not only to hide their identity but also to intimidate their black neighbors. Northern audiences saw a lithograph based on this photograph in Harper's Weekly on December 28, 1868.

Page 52: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Many Negroes and carpetbaggers, quick to take a hint, were scared away from the polls. But those stubborn souls who persisted in their forward ways were flogged, mutilated, or even murdered.

• Radicals in Congress, outraged by this night-

riding lawlessness, passed the iron-toothed Force Acts of 1870 and 1871 that authorized federal prosecutions, military force, and martial law to suppress conspiracies that deprived citizens of the right to vote, hold office, serve on juries, and enjoy equal protection of the law.

Page 53: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Federal troops were able to stamp out much of the “lash law,” but by this time the "Invisible Empire" had already done its work of intimidation.

Page 54: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Large-scale disfranchisement of the Negro, starting conspicuously about 1890, was achieved by intimidation, fraud, and trickery. Among various underhanded schemes were the literacy tests, unfairly administered by whites to the advantage of illiterate whites.

Page 55: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The Grant administration's assault on the Klan illustrated how dependent African Americans and southern Republicans were on the federal government.

• Northern Republicans were growing weary of Reconstruction and the bloodshed it seemed to produce.

Page 56: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Prosecuting Klansmen was an uphill battle with U.S. attorneys, who usually faced all white juries and lacked the resources to handle the cases; after 1872 prosecutions began to drop off and many Klansmen received hasty pardons.

• Republican governments that were denied federal help found themselves overwhelmed by the massive resistance of their ex Confederate enemies; between 1873 and 1875, Democrats overthrew Republican governments in Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi.

Page 57: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• By 1876 Republican governments remained in only Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida; elsewhere the former Confederates were back in control.

Page 58: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The Acquiescent North

• Sympathy for the freedmen began to wane, as the North was flooded with one sided, often racist reports describing extravagant, corrupt Republican rule and a South in the grip of a "massive black barbarism.“

• The Civil Rights Bill introduced by Charles Sumner in 1870 was a remarkable application of federal power against dis crimination, but by its passage in 1875 it had been stripped of its key provisions. The Supreme Court finished its demoli tion when it declared the remnant Civil Rights Act unconstitutional in 1883.

Page 59: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The political cynicism that overtook the Civil Rights Act signaled the Republican Party's reversion to the practical politics of earlier days.

• Some Republicans had little enthusiasm for Reconstruction, except as it benefited their party, and as the party lost headway in the South, they abandoned any interest in the battle for black rights. They repudiated the wartime expansion of federal power and refashioned themselves as liberals who believed in free trade, market compe tition, and limited government.

Page 60: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• By 1877, however, three rights-defining amendments had been added to the Constitution, there was room for blacks to advance economically, and they had confidence that they could lift themselves up.

Page 61: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Democrats controlled the House and set about stalling a final count of the electoral votes, but on March 1 they suddenly ended their delaying tactics and Hayes was inaugurated. Reconstruction had ended.

Page 62: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Among the casualties of the poor economy was the Freedman's Savings and Trust Company, which held the small deposits of thousands of ex-slaves. When the bank failed in 1874, Congress refused to compensate the depositors, and many lost their life savings.

• In denying the blacks' plea for help with their banking disaster, Congress signaled that Reconstruction had lost its moral claim on the country.

Page 63: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The Constitution declares that Congress regulates its own elections, so Congress appointed an electoral commission; the commission awarded the disputed votes to Hayes by a vote of 8 to 7.

Page 64: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The Political Crisis of 1877

• Republicans nominated Rutherford B. Hayes as their presidential candidate, and his Democratic opponent was Samuel J. Tilden; both favored "home rule" for the South.

• When Congress met in early 1877, it was faced with both Republican and Democ ratic electoral votes from Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana.

Page 65: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Concerns about the economy and political fraud, not Reconstruction, absorbed the northern voter as another presidential election approached in 1876.

Page 66: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Grant won a second term overwhelmingly against Horace Greeley in the 1872 election.

• Charges of Republican corruption came to a head in 1875 with a scandal known as the "Whiskey Ring"; the scandal implicat ing Grant's cronies and even his private secretary engulfed the White House.

Page 67: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• The economy had fallen into a severe de pression, which was triggered in 1873 by the bankruptcy of the Northern Pacific Railroad and its main investor, Jay Cooke; many economically pressed Americans believed that Republican financial ma nipulation had caused the depression.

Page 68: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

The Political Crisis of 1877

• In early 1877 Congress was faced with both Republican and Democratic electoral votes from Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana.

Page 69: Reconstruction, 1865–1877. Presidential Reconstruction Lincoln’s Approach The Constitution did not address the question of secession or any procedure

• Democrats controlled the House and set about stalling a final count of the electoral votes, but on March 1 they suddenly ended their delaying tactics, and Hayes was inaugurated. Reconstruction had ended.