recorded 15-3400 lambert appeal exhibit re document re mind control victims symptoms and...

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.coms [email protected]

717-669-2163

Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro SeAdvanced Media Group1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS_______________________________________________________________________________Lisa Michelle Lambert : PETITIONER :

: v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015

U.S. District Court Case No. 14-02559:

Lynn Bissonnette, et al., : RESPONDANT :

:Stanley J. Caterbone : APPELLANT :

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANTEXHIBIT re “Document re Mind Control Victims Symptoms and Demographics Sent

From My Friend Soleilmavis Liu of China, Sent January 1, 2016”_______________________________________________________________________

I hereby on this 2nd day of January, 2016, submit for considerations in the above captioned

case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this

case. The APPELLANT has maintained his victimization of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and the

attached EXHIBIT titled Social Security Disability Benefits for Mind Control with Application

Documents and Correspondence From SSA Examiners and Investigators of 2009,

December 27, 2015 provides the evidence and proof. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is

intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the

Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These

documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the

value of the Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case

No. 05-23059.

The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however

this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the

government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the

days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive

Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

15-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 1 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016

Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112168904 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2016

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/

This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of the APPELLANT'S situation and

persons under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Date: January 2, 2016 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603(717)-669-2163

http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__

15-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 2 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016



General Docket

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-3400 Docketed: 10/08/2015Nature of Suit: 3530 Habeas CorpusLisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et alAppeal From: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaFee Status: Due

Case Type Information:

1) civil 2) private 3) Habeas Corpus-prisoner

Originating Court Information:

District: 0313-2 : 5-14-cv-02559Court Reporter: Joan CarrTrial Judge: Paul S. Diamond, U.S. District Judge

Date Filed: 05/02/2014 Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed:

09/14/2015 09/14/2015 09/30/2015

Prior Cases:

None

Current Cases:

None

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT Plaintiff - Appellee

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.Direct: 215-568-1943Email: [email protected]: 610-456-2727[NTC Retained]P.O. Box 10251631 Baltimore PikeChadds Ford, PA 19317

v.

SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov]Lancaster County Office of District Attorney50 North Duke StreetLancaster, PA 17608

DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov](see above)

ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov](see above)

------------------------------

STANLEY J. CATERBONE Not Party - Appellant

Stanley J. CaterboneDirect: 717-669-2163Email: [email protected][NTC Pro Se]1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

15-3400 Docket https://ecf.ca3.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom

1 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

v.

SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI;DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY;ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

*Stanley J. Caterbone, Appellant

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed.R.App.P.)


2 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

10/08/2015

30 pg, 3.25 MB

CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone in District Court No. 5-14-cv-02559. [-The notice of appeal that was attached to the entry was the incorrect document. The notice ofappeal has been corrected and notice is being resent.]--[Edited 10/09/2015 by CJG] (SB)

10/08/2015 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB)

10/09/2015

2 pg, 27.26 KB

LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for adecision on the issuance of certificate of appealability and possible summary action. (JW)

10/21/2015

42 pg, 4.58 MB

ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificateof Service dated 10/21/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/21/2015

0 pg, 0 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificateof Service dated 10/21/2015. (SJC)

10/22/2015

312 pg, 15.13 MB

ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificateof Service dated 10/22/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/22/2015

1 pg, 28.36 KB

COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 10/21/2015 denying Mr. Caterbone's motion to proceed informa pauperis signed by Paul S. Diamond, filed. (CJG)

10/23/2015

44 pg, 4.6 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate ofService dated 10/23/2015.--[Edited 10/23/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/26/2015

194 pg, 22.28 MB

ECF FILER: Request by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for Oral Argument. [SEND TO MERITS] (SJC)

10/27/2015

2 pg, 21.62 KB

FOLLOW UP LETTER to District Attorney Lancaster County for Attorney General Pennsylvania,Superintendent Framingham MCI and District Attorney Lancaster County and Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr.,Esq. for Lisa Michelle Lambert requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before11/10/2015. (CJG)

11/02/2015

227 pg, 29.4 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit.Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2015.--[Edited 11/02/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/03/2015

8 pg, 1.94 MB

ORDER (Clerk) The motion proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance pending the submission of anadditional document. Appellant must submit this Court's affidavit of poverty within 14 days of the date ofthis order or the appeal may be dismissed, filed. (CJG)

11/03/2015

462 pg, 53.19 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENTS by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submissions as Exhibits.Certificate of Service dated 11/03/2015.--[Edited 11/03/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/04/2015

528 pg, 20.01 MB


11/04/2015

0 pg, 0 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificateof Service dated 11/04/2015. (SJC)

11/06/2015

6 pg, 134.36 KB

ECF FILER: ARGUMENT In Response to Summary Action from Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone, filed.Certificate of Service dated 11/06/2015 by ECF.--[Edited 11/06/2015 by MLR] (SJC)

11/06/2015

174 pg, 33.18 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate ofService dated 11/06/2015.--[Edited 11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/07/2015

45 pg, 312.16 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Consideration for fees in the amount of$284,702.50. Certificate of Service dated 11/07/2015.--[Edited 11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/09/2015

2 pg, 46.85 KB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit "AudioFile of Authentic Recordings of 1987 and 1991". Certificate of Service dated 11/09/2015.--[Edited11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/10/2015

102 pg, 4.75 MB


11/10/2015

91 pg, 21.28 MB


11/13/2015

1 pg, 6.04 KB

ORDER (Clerk) The Motion Proceed In Forma Pauperis is referred to a motions panel, filed. (CJG)

11/13/2015

185 pg, 19.73 MB



3 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

11/16/2015

91 pg, 37.06 MB


11/17/2015

1585 pg, 37.55 MB

ECF FILER: 3DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled submission as exhibit.Certificate of Service dated 11/17/2015.--[Edited 11/19/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/18/2015

807 pg, 79 MB


11/19/2015

232 pg, 10.74 MB


11/20/2015

232 pg, 9.11 MB


11/21/2015

69 pg, 17 MB


11/22/2015

275 pg, 20.95 MB


11/22/2015

3 pg, 1.86 MB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for 30 Day Continuance. Certificate ofService dated 11/22/2015.--[Edited 11/23/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/24/2015

1 pg, 71.71 KB

ORDER (Clerk) The motion for continuance is granted to the extent it can be construed as a motion forextension of time to file a response regarding possible summary action. Appellant's response must be filedand served within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, filed. (CJG)

11/25/2015

783 pg, 35.13 MB


11/27/2015

128 pg, 16.12 MB


11/28/2015

94 pg, 10.13 MB


11/29/2015

122 pg, 15.55 MB


11/30/2015

5 pg, 931.06 KB


12/02/2015

120 pg, 5.45 MB


12/03/2015

0 pg, 0 KB

ECF FILER: LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/03/2015.[As this document contains medical information, it has been locked from public view.]--[Edited 12/07/2015by CJG] (SJC)

12/06/2015

84 pg, 4.14 MB


12/08/2015

102 pg, 6.97 MB

ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis Fraud by the Judiciary of theLancaster County Courts, the U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015 filed byAppellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2015. (SJC)

12/09/2015

114 pg, 24.94 MB

ECF FILER: THE COMPUTER HACKER RUINED THIS FILE, BUT I AM TOO TIRED OF FIXING MYWORK EVERY DAY BECUASE OF HIM - DO WITH IT WHAT YOU WANT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J.Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/09/2015. (SJC)

12/12/2015

57 pg, 2.26 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled "Submission as Exhibit".Certificate of Service dated 12/12/2015.--[Edited 12/14/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

12/14/2015

1 pg, 38.48 KB

ECF FILER: Motion to Withdraw Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J.Caterbone without costs. Certificate of Service dated 12/14/2015. (SJC)

12/17/2015

1 pg, 41.47 KB

ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Clarification of December 14, 2015 Motion toDismiss be Dismissed WITHOUT Prejudice. Certificate of Service dated 12/17/2015. (SJC)

12/18/2015

643 pg, 76.22 MB

ECF FILER: Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/18/2015.--[Edited 12/21/2015 by CJG] (SJC)


4 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

12/19/2015

124 pg, 10.35 MB

ECF FILER: COMPLAINT to U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania re Fulton Bank CriminalConspiracy, December 19, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated12/19/2015. (SJC)

12/19/2015

4 pg, 1.02 MB

ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Samuel Caterbone Jr Evidence of MKULTRA Dates of1957 and 1943, December 19, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Servicedated 12/19/2015. (SJC)

12/25/2015

112 pg, 5.78 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled "Submission as Exhibit".Certificate of Service dated 12/25/2015.--[Edited 12/28/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

12/29/2015

161 pg, 24.06 MB

ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re IC3 Complaint Referral Form Receipt and RECORDEDComplaint I1512261722030362[1] of December 26, 2015 15-3400 EXHIBIT re Social Security DisabilityBenefits for Mind Control with Application Documents and Correspondence filed by Appellant Mr. StanleyJ. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 12/29/2015. (SJC)

12/31/2015

1 pg, 56.93 KB

ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Letter to Rescind Motion To Dismiss ofDecember 14, 2015. Certificate of Service dated 12/31/2015. (SJC)

01/02/2016

69 pg, 5.03 MB

ECF FILER: 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Document re Mind Control Victims Symptoms andDemographics Sent From My Friend Soleilmavis Liu of China, Sent Jan 1, 2016 Filed on January 2, 2016filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated 01/02/2016. (SJC)


5 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

Documents and Docket Summary

Documents Only

Include Page Numbers

Selected Pages: Selected Size: (Max: 50 MB)

Totals reflect accessible documents only and do not include unauthorized restricted documents.

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

Third Circuit - 01/02/2016 09:59:52

PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Description: Docket Report (filtered) Search Criteria: 15-3400

Billable Pages: 3 Cost: 0.30


6 of 6 1/2/2016 10:00 AM

1

Mind Control with Electromagnetic Frequency

Ms. Soleilmavis Liu Sponsor Activist of Peacepink

Yantai, Shandong Province, China

Recent years, the words “mind control abuse and torture” and “target individual” appears frequently on line.

Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic

mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and

hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human

rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

Abstract:

One of the twenty-first century’s greatest violations of human rights is the proliferationof mind control technologies and their accompanying abuse and torture. Thousands of innocent victims across the globe have become activists for their freedom.

Electromagnetic mind control technologies are weapons which use electromagnetic waves to

hijacka person’s brain and nervous system and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making. This article is a brief introduction to mind control technologies, the grave situation of hidden mind control abuses and tortures, and victims, includingSoleilmavis Liu, whose work is to expose mind control technologies and their torturous abuses, and to urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights.

Keywords: Mind control technology; voice-to-skull; victim, Human Rights; Torture; Abuse

Introduction

Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

This article will briefly introduce mind control technologies, current data of mind control

victims, Soleilmavis’ case summary, and their work to expose mind control abuse and torture. Soleilmavis’ case summary and her work will hopefully bring more public awareness to the secret crimes of mind control abuses and tortures.

Brief introduction of mind control technologies

Mind control technologies are weapons which use electronic microchip implants, nanotechnologies, microwaves and/or electromagnetic waves to subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. The development of these methods and technologies has a long history.

1.Nazi Wonder Drug

15-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 3 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 3 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


2

Nazi researchers used concentration camp inmates to test a cocaine-based “wonder drug” they hoped would enhance the performance of German troops. Hamburg-based criminologist Wolf Kemper believed that D-IX pills were Hitler’s last secret development. The so-called Experiment D-IX started in November of the year 1944 in Sachsenhausen concentration camp. The results of all those tests inspired their initiators to supply D-IX drug to the entire Nazi Army. However, they failed to launch the mass production of the substance. The allies’ victories at both fronts in winter and spring of in 1945 resulted in the collapse of the Nazi regime. The absurd dream of the wonder drug was crushed. [1]

According to the “Want to Know” information site, “After the end of World War II, German

scientists were held in a variety of detainment camps by the allies. In 1946, President Truman authorized Project Paperclip to exploit German scientists for American research, and to deny these intellectual resources to the Soviet Union.” Some reports bluntly pointed out that they were “ardent Nazis.” They were considered so vital to the “Cold War” effort that they would be brought into the US and Canada. Some of these experts had participated in murderous medical experiments on human subjects at concentration camps. A 1999 report to the Senate and the House said “between 1945 and 1955; 765 scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought to the US under Paperclip and similar programs.” (Bluebird Report)

2. Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence Agency mind control project. The Central Intelligence Agency’s Fact Book states the NSC (National Security Council) and the

CIA were established under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947. In December 1947, the NSC held its first meeting. James Forrestal, the Secretary of Defense, pushed for the CIA to begin a “secret war” against the Soviets. Forrestal’s initiative led to the execution of psychological warfare operations (psy-ops) in Europe. CIA personnel were not opposed to working with Nazi doctors who had proven to be proficient in breaking the mind and rebuilding it. In some cases, military bases were used to hide these covert activities. It was decided that the communist threat was an issue that took priority over constitutional rights.

One of the areas to be investigated by the CIA was Mind Control. The CIA’s human behavior

control program was chiefly motivated by perceived Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques. Under the protection of “national security,” many other branches of the government also took part in the study of this area. The CIA originated its first program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD, which in 1951, after Canada and Britain had been included, was changed to ARTICHOKE. MKULTRA officially began in 1953. Technically it was closed in 1964, but some of its programs remained active under MKSEARCH well into the seventies. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records. (MC 10, 17)

There is an overwhelming body of evidence that confirms the existence of Mk-ultra. More than

250 people who claim they were the victims of “brainwashing” by America’s Central Intelligence Agency were set to win a multimillion dollar legal battle for compensation. Nine already had each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from the spy agency, which had admitted to settingup an operation codenamed MK-Ultra during the Cold War. [Mike Parker, CIA’s Bourne Identity Plot (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007] [2]



3

3. Implantable electronic chip mind control Many researchers, using nanotechnologies had developed implantable electronic chips that

established new nerve connections in parts of the brain that controlled movement or even altered emotion and thought. Researchers at the University of Washington (UW) had been working on an implantable electronic chip that might help establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controlled movement. Their study, to be published in the November 2, 2006, edition of Nature, showed such a device could induce brain changes in monkeys lasting more than a week (Leila Gray, Tiny Electronic Chip, Interacting with the Brain, Modifies Pathways for Controlling Movement, University of Washington News, October 24, 2006). [3]

On March 18, 2008, the Central Intelligence Agency responded in writing to a Larson Media

Freedom of Information Act request. The document disclosed that the CIA’s use of biomedical intellectual property developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation, Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR) contract #N6600106C8005, was “currently and properly classified pursuant to an executive order in the interest of national security,” and applied to the CIA Director’s “statutory obligation to protect from disclosure, intelligence sources and methods.” The technology, developed under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col. Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, had been protected as a Defense “Special Access Program1” (SAP), which was the official terminology for a “black project.” The research had resulted in implantable devices that were millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, could be surreptitiously implanted (and had been fabricated in a manner that the devices could not be detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provided a shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities, which might include visual and auditory biofeedback data.

Additionally, the devices were capable of delivering testosterone or any other biological agent. 4. Voice to Skull Technologies Artificial microwave voice-to-skull transmission was successfully demonstrated by researcher

Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar at the University of Utah in 1974, and in the journal “American Psychologist” in the March 1975 issue, the article was titled “Microwaves and Behavior” by Dr. Don Justesen (1975). [4]

In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a device: “a nonlethal

weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device, which broadcast sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device, which can transmit ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.” NOTE: The sound modulation might be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of voice-to-skull uses was an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports. [5]

5. Mind reading technologies A team of world-leading neuroscientists has developed a powerful technique that allowed them

to look deep inside a person’s brain, and to read their intentions before they act. The research broke controversial new ground in scientists’ ability to probe people’s minds and

eavesdrop on their thoughts, ethically to be condemned in its technology and applications.



4

“Using the scanner, we could look around the brain for this information and read out something that from the outside, there is no way you possibly could tell is in there. It is like shining a torch around, looking for writing on a wall,” said John Dylan Haynes at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Germany in 2007, who led the study with colleagues at University College London and Oxford University.

In 2011, neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the skulls

of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in the processing of speech and images. As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer program analysed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard.

The scientists believed the technique could also be used to read and report what they were

thinking of saying next. In the journal Plos Biology, they wrote that it took attempts at mind reading to “a whole new

level.” Harvard’s Buckner won the Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds in 2011. Researchers had

shown a capability to read a subject’s mind by remotely measuring their brain activity. This technique could even extract information from individuals, who were unaware of themselves. [6]

Those mind reading technologies use EEC with decoding of neurological signals remotely with

or without an implant through satellite or through TV Mobile transmission towers. The following data was from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab, “The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level.”

Scientists believed the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter was within the

detectable limits of the satellite. It was technically possible for a satellite to detect your thoughts, emotions and perceptions, and pass that information to a computer for interpretation. [7]

6.Patents of Mind Control Technologies Many patents had indicated the existence of mind control technologies, such as: USP # 6,729,337 (May 4, 2004), Sony owned a patent “Sony Brain Waves Manipulation By

Ultrasound” for an “ultrasound array” that supposedly stimulated your brain waves to simulate sensory experiences causing its users to experience smells, tastes and even touch without external stimuli.

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002), Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

7. More evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies. There is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies. I will only give

a few as example.



5

Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period, 1953-1977,prepared at the request of Howard W. Cannon, chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, published in 1979 by U.S. Government Printing Office in Washington, disclose that since 1952, the Soviet government began directing microwave beams at the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

A study funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, has perfected the art of

using electrical signals to manipulate the color of a squid’s iridescent skin over the entire color spectrum. The Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts carried out the research.[8] If they could manipulate animals, they could manipulate humans too.

A former KGB officer has divulged secrets of special mind control techniques that security

services in developed nations used during and after the Cold War, a Russian government daily said in December 2006.

General Boris Ratnikov, who served in the KGB department for Moscow and the Moscow

Region, told RossiiskayaGazeta that people in power had resorted to various methods of manipulating individuals’ thoughts since ancient times and that it was hardly surprising that secret services adopted the practice when it acquired a scientific foundation in the twentieth century.

In the mid-eighties, about fifty research institutes in the Soviet Union studied remote mind

control techniques backed by substantial government funding, but all such research efforts were halted with the demise of the Soviet empire in the early nineties.

Ratnikov, who subsequently served as deputy head and then senior consultant at the Federal

Guard Service from 1991 to 1997, said his department was in charge of safeguarding top officials in post-Soviet Russia against any external influence on their sub-conscious.

The general stated emphatically that he and his colleagues had never manipulated the minds of

the then president, Boris Yeltsin, or of economic reformer YegorGaidar, but claimed to have used mind-reading to save Russia’s first president and the country from a war with China.

Yeltsin had planned to visit Japan in 1992, but Ratnikov’s department detected attempts to

“program” the president’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan. The move would have led to demands from China that it regains its disputed territories from Russia as well, a conflict that could have sparked a war between the two neighbors. Yeltsin, therefore, was forced to cancel the trip.

Another of the general’s revelations is that senior officials in Western Europe and the United

States unwittingly provided information to his department, which was able to read their minds thanks to Soviet-era scientific achievements.

In the early nineties, Ratnikov and his colleagues “scanned” the mind of new U.S. Ambassador

Robert Strauss to see that the embassy building contained equipment to exert psychotronic influence on Moscow residents but, according to the general, it had been deactivated. [9]



6

Research into electromagnetic spectrums weapons had been secretly carried out in the US and

Russia since the fifties. Plans to introduce the super-weapons were announced quietly in March 2012 by Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, fulfilling a little-noticed election campaign pledge by president-elect Putin. Mr. Serdyukov said, “The development of weaponry based on new physics principles - Direct Energy weapons, Geophysical weapons, Wave-energy weapons, Genetic weapons, Psychotronic weapons, and so on - is part of the state arms procurement programme for 2011-2020.”[10]

There was no doubt that, notwithstanding that governments still covered-up the development

and research of mind control technologies, the government owned advanced technologies, which could read mankind thoughts remotely and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system with electromagnetic frequencies.

As early as 1998, scientists had warned that the control and manipulation of a human brain was

a terrifying possibility. Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas, US Army (ret), published an article in the military journal Parameters which likened the mind to a new battlefield. He quoted a Russian army major in relation to weapons that affected the mind, “It is completely clear that the state, which is first to create such weapons, will achieve incomparable superiority.” Thomas expressed concern about “information dominance,” though he stopped short of the moral implications. (Timothy L. Thomas,

The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92) [11] Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton raised high concerns of human rights

violations implemented with electromagnetic spectrums weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights.” (Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and

Human Rights, December 2006) [12] Carole Smith, a British psychoanalyst, in recent years has been openly critical of government

use of intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens, in the article “Diagnosis Psychosis in Light of Mind Invasive Technology - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology.”

The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 called for a worldwide ban on weapons

that might enable “any form” of the “manipulation of human beings.” [13] USA Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced bill H.R. 2977 (2001), which was referred to

the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

H.R. 2977 (2001) preserved the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all

humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and required the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.



7

In this bill, the terms “weapon” and “weapons system” included a device capable of the following: “directing a source of energy, including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultralow frequency (ULF) energy radiation, against that object,” “through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.”

The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a special

category of psychotronic (psycho = “mind” &tronic= “electronic”) mind control and other electromagnetic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament. [14] Reported stories about people who claimed that they were mind control victims

There are many reported stories about people who have claimed that they were tortured and harassed by remote voice-to-skull and electromagnetic mind control technologies. Most of the public including media labeled them as conspiracy theorists, or mentally ill persons. Their stories were regarded as conspiracy work.

In the days and weeks before authorities say he shot three people at the Florida State University

library and was then gunned down by Tallahassee police, Myron May posted a video about mind control to Facebook, and earlier an image of a Google business card with the words “Targeted individual.” He also posted a video of former professional wrestler and Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura interviewing a man who claims to have created technology that allows the federal government to control people’s minds.

Jimmy Shao of Sacramento, California, was arrested for calling 911 more than one hundred

times in one month in May 2013. Shao said he would not stop until Congress investigates the shadow government who use satellites to control his mind and body.

Jared Loughner, 23, who accused of shooting a US congresswoman in Arizona and killing six

others on January 8, 2011, claimed that he was being mind-controlled. Fayette woman Angela Modispaw claimed she heard voices telling her to kill her mother in 2009.

Another suspected victim, Honduras’ fallen leader told The Miami Herald, he was being

subjected to mind-altering gas and radiation - and that “Israeli mercenaries” are planning to assassinate him.

Ronald Morgan, 18, a teenage high school dropout who told investigators he was acting on

God’s orders confessed to beating his father to death with a baseball bat on May 27, 2001. Morgan said God had told him in a dream to kill his parents. Michael Robert Lawrence, accused of murdering a vacuum cleaner salesman in Waialua, said he was on a “mission” to kill people and chop up their bodies after voices commanded him to do so, a psychiatrist testified on April 3, 2001. T.J.

Richard Scott Baumhammers, 34, was arrested Friday, April 28, 2000, following a shooting

rampage that left five dead and one seriously injured in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area. Baumhammers told a psychiatrist that he could hear people talking about him, and it interfered with



8

his work. Solomon, 15, allegedly opened fire on other students at Heritage High School on August 10,

1999. He heard voices telling him to do strange things, but they were robotic voices, not human voices.

Tami Stainfield is a woman with evidence that proves she and others are victims of predictive

analytics robotics and human logistics. She claimed that “we are tortured, hostages, and slaves to a network of technology void from identification and protection.”She had filed as a “no party” candidate in 2012 for the Presidency of the United States.

On February 28, 2011, many mind control victims provided statements to Presidential

Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues on a meeting in Washington, DC. These were only a very few reported stories from many victims all over the world. The majority

of victims’ stories had been ignored by the media and the public. Current data about mind control victims

Since 2006, many people who claimed to be mind control victims started connecting through the Internet, working together to write countless letters to government departments, social communities, human rights organizations, the media and the general public. Some victims organized some demonstrations in their countries and filed their lawsuits. Some victims organized meetings to meet together to discuss how to fight well. Some victims placed advertisements in major newspapers. Victims also launched worldwide conference calls.

Mind Control abuse and torture is becoming a larger issue worldwide. So far, USA, Europe, and

China are the most impacted areas. At least more than 2,000 victims in each of these areas have complained about being attacked by voice-to-skull and electromagnetic mind control technologies. There are also many victims in other countries, including over 200 in Russia, over 100 in India, and over 100 in Japan.

According to an anonymous survey (result on December 19, 2009) for 296 mind control victims

all over the world, including 130 females and 166 males, 71.29% of all victims had completed a college degree, with 13.86% of all victims attaining a Master or a Doctor degree. [15]

Their Ages were:10-20: 13 (4.39%); 21-30: 64 (21.62%); 31-40: 87 (29.39%); 41-50: 70 (23.65%); 51-60: 42

(14.19%); 61-70: 15 (5.07%); above 70: 5 (1.69%). Year Torture Began: 1970-1980: 29 (9.80%); 1981-1990: 40 (13.51%); 1991-1995: 34 (11.49%); 1996: 18

(6.08%); 1997: 5 (1.69%); 1998: 11 (3.72%); 1999: 6 (2.03%); 2000: 16 (5.41%); 2001: 17 (5.74%); 2002: 15 (5.07%);

2003: 12 (4.05%); 2004: 21 (7.09%); 2005: 15 (5.07%); 2006: 17 (5.74%); 2007: 11 (3.72%); 2008: 23 (7.77%). Ages when they were aware of being a target: 10-20: 69 (23.31%); 21-30: 92 (31.08%); 31-40: 49

(16.55%); 41-50: 59 (19.93%); 51-60: 21 (7.09%); 61-70: 5 (1.69%); above 70: 1 (0.34%). The possible reasons victims believed they became a target were:



9

(1) Government Secret Human Experiments or Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiments supported by

Government (58.11%);

(2) Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiment (36.82%);

(3) Government Secret War (33.45%);

(4) Secret Political persecution (32.77%);

(5) Terrorist violence (22.97%);

(6) Misuse of weapons by government corruption (45.27%).

The symptoms victims experienced as a possible result of this technology:

(1) Hot and Cold Flashes 148 50.00%

(2) Nausea 151 51.01%

(3) Severe sweating 119 40.20%

(4) Induced Sleep 193 65.20%

(5) Sleep deprivation 233 78.72%

(6) Extreme Fatigue 203 68.58%

(7) Blurred Vision 170 57.43%

(8) Sensations of pain in internal organs 183 61.82%

(9) Sensations of pain in backbone, arms, legs, and muscles 174 58.78%

(10) Numbness and tingling, Paresthesias, Loss of sensation 144 48.65%

(11) Muscle Cramps /Spasms/tension 167 56.42%

(12) Sudden Headaches 189 63.85%

(13) Irregular Heartbeat 180 60.81%

(14) False Heart Attacks 115 38.85%

(15) Tooth Pain 149 50.34%

(16) Diarrhea. 131 44.26%

(17) Acute inflammation/autoimmunity reactions 75 25.34%

(18) Autoimmune disorders like Fibromyalgia 50 16.89%

(19) Urinary tract infections 53 17.91%

(20) Skin problems and skin irritations 149 50.34%

(21) Change in growing of hair and nails 95 32.09%

(22) Female problems which eventually lead to hysterectomy 24 8.11%

(23) Cancer 13 4.39%

(24) Fevers 68 22.97%

(25) Flulike Symptoms /Sneezing 126 42.57%

(26) Dizziness or Loss of Balance 164 55.41%

(27) Sudden loss of consciousness 91 30.74%

(28) Benign or Malignant Tumors 24 8.11%

(29) Sensation of Electric Current Running through the Body 161 54.39%

(30) Induced Thoughts/ telepathic communication, messages 191 64.53%

(31) Hearing “voices” (reception of auditory acoustic weapon transmissions or similar) 201 67.91%

(32) Seeing "Holograms" 124 41.89%

(33) Dream Manipulation 211 71.28%

(34) Artificial Emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness) 201 67.91%

(35) Sudden “unexpected" Sexual Arousal 159 53.72%

(36) Genital manipulation 163 55.07%

(37) Induced Smells 154 52.03%



10

(38) Sudden extreme moodswings (depression - euphoria) 142 47.97%

(39) Induced pleasure-aversion reactions towards people or objects 133 44.93%

(40) Making you say things (forced speech) 135 45.61%

(41) General behaviour control in some situations 147 49.66%

(42) Manipulation of Memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories) 199 67.23%

(43) Remote steering of eye movements 114 38.51%

(44) Remote steering of body movements/motor control 126 42.57%

(45) Virtual reality experiences while awake 104 35.14%

50.34% of all victims have been forced to accept psychiatric treatment, the length of being

forced to accept psychiatric treatment were: (1) 1-3 months 66 22.30%

(2) 4-6 months 12 4.05%

(3) 7-12 months 4 1.35%

(4) 1 year 10 3.38%

(5) 2-3 years 17 5.74%

(6) 4-5 years 11 3.72%

(7) 6-8 years 9 3.04%

(8) 9-10 years 1 0.34%

(9) above 10 years 20 6.76% All victims claimed that the psychiatric treatment did not have any therapeutic effect.

Soleilmavis’ Case summary of Mind Control abuse and torture

Soleilmavis is a Chinese citizen, born and raised in China, who was first attacked in December, 2001 when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia. At the time she was unfamiliar with remote electromagnetic weapons which can control thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. Eventually, she would come to learn of these technologies that are being secretly used or covered by governments worldwide to control and harass the populace.

Noticeable effects started with some noises (whispering voices) which she heard from the floor

below her or from the neighbors’ houses. The other people who lived in the same house could not hear them. Soon she started to experience a wide variety of symptoms.

Majority of the symptoms were: pain all over the body, stomach pain, toothaches, headaches,

involuntary hand tremors, inability to stand firmly on her legs, alternation of cold and hot sensations, excessive perspiration,high fevers, constipation, faece and piss incontinence,sexual harassment, sleep deprivation, dream manipulation, artificial emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness), andmanipulation of memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories). Torturers also can make her say things (forced speech).All those symptoms would disappear without any medical treatment, or sometimes, a pain would persist, even if she had strong medication.

She was like a little trapped marionette being controlled by invisible strings. Some unknown

people held the strings and controlled her actions: speaking, walking, eating, sleeping, and even her thoughts and emotions.



11

On April 5, 2002, she left Australia, and went to Hong Kong, Thailand, Shanghai andNew

Zealand, but could not escape the harassment and torture. When she was in Hong Kong, her brain was controlled by voice-to-skull and remote electromagnetic mind control technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in HongKong. It was strange that there were so many Security Guards outside the US Embassy, but nobody stopped her or asked her anything.

During the past years, Soleilmavis worked hard to expose mind control technologies and their

torturous abuses, and urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights.She wrote her book “Twelve Years in the Grave - Mind Control with Electromagnetic Spectrums, the Invisible Modern Concentration Camp” to let the public know details of her story.She and other victims in her network have started a concerted campaign against secret mind control weapons abuse and torture. They are demanding an international investigation into these crimes which constitute immense violations of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Provided the fact that her brain was remotely controlled by voice-to-skull and electromagnetic

mind control technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in Hong Kong, she urges the US government to investigate her case. She also requires the cooperation and support of the governments of Australia and China, and requests assistance from the United Nations and other governments in investigating her case. She wishes the public help her to urge governments to take immediate actions.

Conclusions

It can be seen that mind control weapons are well developed and they are being used secretly to torture and harass innocent citizens. Many victims are currently working in conjunction with Soleilmavis to start a worldwide campaign against secret mind control weapons abuse and torture.

In this research, the following conclusions were reached: 1) Many countries have developed various types of mind control methods: drugs, microchips,

nanotechnologies and electromagnetic waves. Could these governments also introduce legislation to regulate the use of such weapons?

2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the misuse of such weapons.

3) In the event of misuse of such weapons, government intervention is required to protect the victims’ and prosecute torturers to the fullest extent of the law.

It is hoped that this paper will bring about public awareness and solutions to mind control

weapons abuse and torture.

References: [1] Nazi Wonder Drug, http://www.amphetamines.com/nazidrug.html, 9/11/2002, accessed August 19, 2013

[2] Mike Parker , CIA'S BOURNE IDENTITY PLOT (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007,

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/12781/CIA accessed August 19, 2013

[3] Leila Gray,Tiny electronic chip, interacting with the brain, modifies pathways for controlling movement, University

of Washington News, October 24, 2006

http://www.washington.edu/news/archive/27624 accessed August 19, 2013

[4] Dr. Don Justesen,Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975,



12

http://www.randomcollection.info/ampsychv2s.pdf accessed August 19, 2013

[5] Voice-to-skulldeviceshttp://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html accessed August 19, 2013

[6] Harvard’s Buckner wins Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds, February 24, 2011,

http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/goodage/2011/02/24/harvards-buckner-wins-alzheimers-award-for-reading-our-minds/#axz

z1U2ENzowU accessed August 19, 2013

[7] Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/satellite-surveillance accessed August 19, 2013

[8] T. J. Wardill, P. T. Gonzalez-Bellido, R. J. Crook, R. T. Hanlon. Neural control of tuneable skin iridescence in

squid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1374

[9] Ex-agent reveals KGB Mind Control techniques – paper 22/12/2006

http://www.en.rian.ru/russia/20061222/57596889.html accessed August 19, 2013

[10] ChristopherLeake and Will Stewart,Putin targets foes with 'zombie' gun which attack victims' central nervous

system Could be used against Russia's enemies and perhaps its own dissidents, March 31, 2012

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123415/Putin-targets-foes-zombie-gun-attack-victims-central-nervous-system.

html accessed August 19, 2013

[11] Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92.

[12] Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December

2006,

http://www.earthpulse.com/epulseuploads/articles/MindControlHumanRights.pdf?/ accessed August 19, 2013

[13] Environment, security and foreign affairs, A4-0005/1999, The European Parliament

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//E

N#Contentd14937e476 accessed August 19, 2013

[14] 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva,

A Joint Initiative of: Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva

United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research

Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, IUHEI

http://www.unidir.ch/pdf/activites/pdf2-act201.pdf accessed August 19, 2013

[15] An anonymous Survey for Mind Control Victims (result on 19 Dec 2009)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Peacepink/message/2569

January 2015



Business Leadership M.S. - Earn your Master's in Business Leadership 100% online. Learn more now! | Read More »

Soleilmavis Liu | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAkAAAJyDFQBjNFL9KT...

1 of 8 1/2/2016 9:48 AM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 15 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


4Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Advanced


2 of 8 1/2/2016 9:48 AM



Sponsor/Activist

(

(

(

(

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Advanced


3 of 8 1/2/2016 9:48 AM



The Book: "The Queen of the South in Matthew 12:42", is a strong and well-reasoned piece that

(

(

(

(

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Advanced


4 of 8 1/2/2016 9:48 AM



Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 1 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 1 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 201515-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 15 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 19 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


[email protected]

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED

STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.

The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to

individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic

telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts. We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this

legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: [email protected] and visit our library of

documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

_________________________________________________

The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

Page 1Advanced Media Grop Page 1 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 2 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 2 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 201515-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 16 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 20 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


Advanced Media Grop Page 2 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 3 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 3 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 201515-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 17 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 21 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


District Office

Second Street

King City Mo.

660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly

by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical

injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on

men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use

of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.

Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their

knowledge or consent.

There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of

Veri-chip and RF signals.

I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,

Rep. Jim Guest

May 21, 2009

Capitol Office

State Capitol

Jefferson City Mo.

573-751-0246



Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title -

This bill may be cited as the “Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

Bill”””

Section 2. Findings and Purpose

A) Findings

1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration

of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among

these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, “the framers of the Constitution sought

"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for

this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.“

3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the

voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.

4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the

Convention.

B) Purpose

To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,

directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to

purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.

Section 3. Organized Stalking

If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously

harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,

or by imprisonment in a federal prison.

If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,

injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,

or four years.

For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of

conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the

person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *



For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a

period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected

activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that

performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern

of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target

of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to

prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."

For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited

to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any

contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his

or her immediate family.

For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person

related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly

resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

Section 4. Punishment for threats

Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great

bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in

writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and

thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year..

For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or

not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly

resided in the household.

"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,

computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices

Obscene, threatening or annoying communication

(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by

means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the

person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.



(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by

means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or

electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand

dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:

(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any

combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.

(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of

an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic

contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.

(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where

the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed

when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a

telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.

(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person

or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.

(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not

limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault

upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by

imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that

directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of

inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,



mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies

directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.



Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based weapons

May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore9 comments

The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically

and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.

Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),

introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident who claims she’s been targeted by “remote transmission” from space-based weaponry.

Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around the country to speak at Tuesday’s council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been

zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.

The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty

permanently banning “space-based weapons,” even though the legislation first introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that

Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.

Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly

emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.

RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two

yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.

“I’m going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of



http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/#comments

https://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/

dumb ideas,” Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based

weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the

past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.

The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.

The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that

supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from long-range missiles might not be wise.

Pimple disputed what he called “knee-jerk” reactions from RPA members who depicted President Ronald Reagan’s proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as

the “Star Wars” initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the project’s

moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.

The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, “is you can knock out someone’s weapons long

before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.

RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for

the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college

that predicted truths 20 years in advance.

“It’s easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the

wrong mindset,” Martinez said.

Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesn’t support war.

“The weaponization of space…is something I think is extremely immoral and we should not be as a nation engaging in,” Myrick said. “Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that

may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset…..that’s why I support this resolution.”

Amy Lee Anderson, a “targeted individual” who brought the matter to Beckles’ attention, was thankful that the council took up the issue.

“No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support,” Anderson said. “We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are

dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no experience to fathom it, it’s so sophisticated.”

Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning ‘exotic’ space-based

weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones

Comments

1. C’mon Richmond Standard….your bias is showing!



http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/dirty-bomb-drill-in-richmond-alarms-conspiracy-theorists-including-alex-jones/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

[email protected]

717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower and

Targeted Individual (Victim) of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

Executive Summary©

Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced MediaGroup are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both

Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties andhis Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he

founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblowerwhen, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer

and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted andplead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via

South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Courtfor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus

Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court ofAppeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Page 1 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015Advanced Media Grop Page 10 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 11 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 11 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 201515-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 25 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 29 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,

&

STAN J. CATERBONEFederal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)

Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Controland Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

copyright 2009

“Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding

it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or theHatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards

America and the West?

See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, aU.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this

HATRED towards America.

Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to mywww.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most

prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a weekor so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.

You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the

U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and ourTroops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I

Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. Whatdo you believe in?”

Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated: October 10, 2015

Date Completed: July 28, 2009

Date Initiated: July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com



http://www.scribd.com/amgroup



http://www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,

state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,

trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.

Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and

rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By

the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the “Attacks” and “Torture” from the

employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.

Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking

Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in

an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state

and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White

House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and

Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.

Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer

hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus

Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul

Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to

be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling

evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of “Entrapment” that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the

Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-

3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free




Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary

Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated

Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in

the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a

desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in

the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far

as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions

of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of

$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,

Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert

case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the

fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on

August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey

Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of

Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing

Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the

U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County

community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.

John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the

Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.



In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to

1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and

Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of

Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National

Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to

find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am

alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and

provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.



HISTORY

In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal

and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since

1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which

resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,

Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public

allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials

and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the

selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims

Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of

all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and

local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most

valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-

Work under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies

since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National

Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL

SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with

over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable

organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United

States as of 1992.



The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:

George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current

Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and

currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of

Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con

scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms

merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle EasternCountries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.

Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great

Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's

subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel

regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraqstory and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert

Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam

Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by

Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster

Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph

Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would notbelieve him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal

counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,Lancaster, County.




Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented JamesGuerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police

Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007

Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger

negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;

burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender

liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had

to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being

uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these

activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The

pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over

time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order

to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way

possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.

Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.

Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.

Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.

Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family

into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of

action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community

away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort

any monies and/or possessions of value.



Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues

from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of

specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited

and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are

now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted

these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved

such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or

their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and

the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be

influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in

nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant

representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-

2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of

Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security

of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May

16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.

One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,

Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under

the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet

another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking

with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total

Mind Control.



REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud

within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to

suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or

"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and

never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of

Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie

Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was

the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the

topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental

telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices

and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.

This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action

in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The

main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is

connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of

Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person

without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of

Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into

mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program

labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.



FAMILY HISTORY

If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,

Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like

the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family

because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning

business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his

father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as

his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and

finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and

had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services

industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue

everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is

against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and

has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,

father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began

during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is

most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA

or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions

with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that

were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school

documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's

subprograms.



The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and

graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional

student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well

as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a

successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the

solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was

definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities. His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized

stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a

world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a

covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history

laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of

MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City

Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking

account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster

Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his

only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President

Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the

County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own

corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial

Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more

on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his

life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised

from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of

his record online. On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate. The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend

of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per

Julianne McKinney, former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and “the one thing that I worry



about is that of dying of cancer” (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was

a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.

In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of

October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,

with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"

trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others

questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately

responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara

Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than

suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The

hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set

a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic

Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.

Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and

lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and

Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.

FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this

day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an

exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the

Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey

and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and

selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,

Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars

of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith



Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High

School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a

federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries

and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and

will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his

legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,

without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most

likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster

Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B

grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in

computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and

continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business

administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power

Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of

impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they

were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,

despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a

close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in

very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:

One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated

with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word

"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.

Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August

10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005

by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302

Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.

The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false

arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary

appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as



pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE

v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;

Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000

pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary

offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and

several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an

exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as

plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local

courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County

Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High

School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his

court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service

records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social

Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;

and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster

Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County

Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment

records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and

documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.freedomffchs.com

https://www.scribd.com



https://www.scribd.com/

http://www.freedomffchs.com/


DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently

been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are

using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is

often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay

secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist

turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

[email protected]

The following are no longer in service:www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://ww w.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup




http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup


http://www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.twitter.com/scaterbone

http://www.facebook.com/scaterbone

http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01

http://www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/


September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advance Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Derrick RobinsonFreedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

P.O. Box 9022Cincinnati, Ohio 45209

Phone 1-800-571-5618Fax 1-866-433-4170

email: [email protected]

Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking andCovert Surveillance?

Derrick,

My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center

Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like tosend your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,

unless you think the exposure would be harmful.

I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on mehere in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the

country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras acrossLancaster City — making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article

attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.

I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking andharassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some

history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in ournew convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint

venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the

CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in thedomestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the

Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,see attached.

Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were

several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.

Click here for an overview of ISC.

Click here to see t he Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or

ISC.

Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the eveningof the ISC indic tments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press

Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ BillionDollar Fraud.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kOIOTpxtj8





advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/isc-search-lancaster-newspapers-archives-dec-25-2007.pdf



http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage13.html

advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lnp-isc-headlines-may-22-2007.pdf



mailto:[email protected]

http://www.freedomfchs.com/

http://www.freedomfchs.com/

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one ofthe oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster

has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administrationhas a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with

ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline

regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained inmy Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his

relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of RobertGates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forthquestions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members

of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISCand the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa

and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.

Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here afew months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,

Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.

Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,National Security Agency:

"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a super-

secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listeningposts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to

follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSAmade sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma

Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in

1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firmsto stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some

civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify itsefforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its

top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been thefather of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense

structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, beganregular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,

1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.

Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, fromJanuary 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,

including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegaland unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the

agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to JimmyCarter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of

remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according toWikipedia.

Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),

former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Controlindustry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:



http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LC&p_theme=lc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_dispstring=headline(Robert%20Gates)%20AND%20date(last%206%20months)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=-6qzM&p_field_advanced-0=title&p_text_advanced-0=(%22Robert%20Gates%22)&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via

their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big timedefense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.

Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman

requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his criticsspeculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a

member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent orapproved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).

Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:

George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.

James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of

International Signal & Control, (ISC).

My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.

His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.

George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).

George W. Bush flew with the Navy.

James Cross

I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was JosephTate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin

and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick

Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letterinvolves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame

and eventually outing her.

Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense IntelligenceAgency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and

airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way toCalifornia. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense

Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making meconfirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's

Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents forCATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military basesbefore releasing me.

In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me

at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a trainingexercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield

Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weekslonger than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.

We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her newalbum, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed

by other telepathic assailants.My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was

hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon

after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.

I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.






advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-roda-documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf




Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone












AFFIDAVIT

BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced

Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science

Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal

age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed

to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone

was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words. The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning

by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited

me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my

demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that

the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in

financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders

and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station

Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and

James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;

Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.

And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as

S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my

immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies

would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT

is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.



s [email protected]

www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.comwww.scribd.com/amgroup01

www.facebook.com/scaterbonewww.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbonehttp://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPViolations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination

and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to AuthoritiesDecember 6, 2015

Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy – Issue a few everyyear to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition toisolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit fromdefending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strongChristian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. TheMillersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial ofentitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC duringthe same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of2005, original not signed by David Pflumm

2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing

Fulton Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,

Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with BarleySnyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster CityPolice in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006

7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael

Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John

Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in

March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by

Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.












14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No

Formal Notice16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police

Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security

Officer.19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian

Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on myWordpress Blog.

20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reasonwas for complaining of harassment and stalking.

21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University PoliceChief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,Debra Hoeckler

22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,with no reason and no written notice.

23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside andwas told by bartender to leave and not come back.

24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let mecommunicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.

25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complainregarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged inDiscrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to LegalCounsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.

Dated: December 6, 2015



of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015Advanced Media Grop Page 36 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 37 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 37 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 201515-3400 Lamber Appeal re Mind Control Page 51 of 65 Saturday, January 2, 201615-3400 Lambert Appeal re Mind Control Page 55 of 69 Saturday, January 2, 2016


��

�

��

�!" ��# ��"��$%�&�� !�� "�#��$��%��

�� "&#� �� '�� $��(��%�� '�� (�� "� � ")��"�� *�� )�� !�� "� !��+ �"� *�� "� ,�

!�� ,�""�� !�" � ��!��"� �� !�� "��!�� ,��,�

��+ �� "�-�� !��!� �� )��

�� *�� %� �� (�� *�� (��

��%�� !�� .�� /"0��!�� , �*��1��!��+��2"3��

�

� � 4��- �� 1 �� "��"� 1�,� � !�� !� � ��4�� 1�,� � �� !��!� �� )�� ** !"��

�� ! ��5� ��6 )��"��"�� #��4��4��+��&,,-��.��.��$��/��..$/�� &,,0��

��%��%��1��2��1��%�� &,,� � � � 3�� &,,�� %�� 4��%��

��%��

& � �� ,��,"� �� " �"�� !,�� " � �5�� 00�� 6��

��7��8��9��%��

: � 7-�� 8, �9��, �"2��! "�,��,�, ��!��1� �, �� ** !��

��, �!� ��:��7 �� ),��.��4��;��

��&,,-��(��&<;=�� 5��(�� >�� $;$��?�� $��

�� !��%��%��4�� 1��&,,@��&,,=��,�� $��>��

�� A��1�B3��.+�� &,,= ��1�B3�� 2�� >��

��%��



�

< � � )�� *� "� )� �� !�� A�� 24��1��!��'��&,,��&,�, ��A��%��

1�� 2��5�� %��%�� "��#9� �� 9� ��

- � ��!��)��"��"��"�� ;��"� ��,�� .��4��4��"$��C#��&,,@(&,,= ��A��D��$��

3�� 1�� B�� 3�� 24�� %�� 5�� !�� %��

��% � ��&,,0��4��%�� %�� !��%�3��%� ��

@ � <�� "�- �� "" ��*�� ,�!� "��+��,�� :��

!�� *�� %�� E�� %�� 0�=� ��

�� 9� �� 9� �� $�� 0�=9��00&9�00��&,,-��&,�, �$�� !��

��%��%�� !�� %�� D��3��$�� !��%��%�� 3��

= � �))��/4��0��),�� "��$��;��F��G��+��0�=��/��F��G��%�� !��+��$��3��00� ��&,,<��

�� 3�� *�� E�� 3�� 3�� "�� H��%#� �� $��/��%��$��D��$��$��.��+��

��&,,-��&,�, ��

� � 4�!-��"�� , ��- ��.�� 3�� *�� &,,@� �� D�� $�� /�� B��$��&,,� ��

0 � 6��-)�! � �� 24�� 0�=� �� .�� A�� *�� D�� /��4� �� /�� 00�� 3�� $�� 00=;�00� � � .�� 5��:��

��

�, � #��!� 7�� 3�� %�� &,,-� �� &,�,� �� !�� D�� $��

$��!��D��$��3��D��3��$��D�%��A��D��E�� 7F��!��8�F��D��$��&,,-��&,,0��>�� %�� !��D��$��

3��D��A��%�� ;��%�� .��+�%� ��%�� 4 ��E�� $��



�

�� ) �� 7�� 24�� 00�� F��F��A��$;$��(F��7��8 ��!��

�� .�� ,-(&&��&,,-��1��$��2��1��3��

�& � # � =�� $�� %�� &,,-� �� D�� $�� /��B��3��1��

�: � �� 5�� "� �*� <�� :#��) �� "�� .�� 0�=� ��/��F��G�� 00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3��1�� $�� 3�� .��/��$��

�< � �� > )�"" ""��"�� 0�=� �� /��;3��$��&,,@��

�- � #,�"�!��""��"��E��%��D��E��$��&,,-��$��D�� 3��

�@ � ��" � �� ""�� 24�� =� �� 0�=� �� &,� �� &,,-� �� &,,@� �� $��3��D��$��$��$��3�� !��

�= � ��" � ��)��"�� "�� =� ��,�� D��$��3�� 0�=��@,��&,,@�� !��@,�1�� &,,@� �� 9��

�� !��@,�� !��

�� #"�!,��!��" "�1�,��" ��!�� "�*��# �) ��":��- �"��E�� 0�=� �� /�� F��

G�� .�� &,,-� �� !�� !��B��3��

�0 � ��"�� #��) ��.��0�=��/��F��G��00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3�� 1�� $�� 3�� /��$�� :�� &,,-��

��'��9��9��9��9��9�� A�� %��

��

&, � ("� ��,�� !�� .�� 00�� $�� 3�� $�� !��7��8��

&,�,�� !�� F��&,,��&,�, �



�

&� � �, *"��*�#��) ��F��)��$��

&& � ��"��:��!-�� &,,-��4��%�� A��D��$��3��1��

&: � ��;�!��, ��!��"��>��?�" �� 24��&,,0�� 5��>��;�� B��

��%� ��

&< � ��)� �� <!-�� $��/��%�� $��D��$��$��.��+��&,,-��

&,�, ��F�� $��%��&,�, ��5��%��%��(�� 2�� %��

&- � �� -�� A�� &,,-� �� &,�, � � $�� A�� )��A��+��.+��$��$��

&@ � �� * � �! :� ��:�, *� �*� @�� 7��"�� .�� 3�� 0�= � � ��&,,�� &,,0�� 3�� *��

&= � 5� !�� !� 6 )��"� ��"�� 7�"!� � �)"�":��)"�� .��4��&,,@�� E��4��&,,@��"��#��

&� � 5� !�� !�6 )��"��"�� ;��.��4��&,,- ��

&0 � ��! ��<�")��+��"��.��/��0�=�"&#��@��-��9�&,,@��:��9�&,,0��

��9��&,�,�� .��$��$��/��B��00��&,,� ��

:, � 7��)�� , *� �*��!�� "��F�� 0�= ��

A��;A�� 0�=� �� F��0�= ��



� � �3� � ��!�� !��6��0�= � ��0�=� �� "��$��.��.��

�� +�� 1�� $�� .�� #� �� I�$��$��"2��!��$��+��#�� '��J��+�� .�� 00&� ��

�+$;F��&,;&,��F��00� �!��'�� D�� 3�� $� 24��"$��A�� +��1��.��#�� $��$� ��$��1��1��"1E1#�$��

�� K�� 0=,K� ��E�� K�� 3��>��L��F��F��.� �A��A�� .��F��+��B��+��1��$�

��+��1��$��$ ��$��1��1�� B�� 6�� $� �� 3��>�� +�� B�� 1�� $��

��$��!�� 00,K�� >�� 1�� B�� 3��>�� 1�B3�� F�� !�� F��!� �� !�A�! � � � � !�� >��

�� 1��1�� 00��%�� F��F�� )��%��3��F��7��8 � � � ��

&,,-��&�1��1�� !�4�� '�� A��.��3��!�4��

�� A�� F�� 4�� 0<,K�� 4��

��0=,K��0�,K��00,K��9�� A� ��.��1�� 3��>�� %�� 2!� �4�� /��&,,��F��)��%�$�� A�� .��

�� 0@,K�� D�1� �4�� A?�D!B�� 0@,K��"��#��+��$��0�<9��F��$��$��*��00� �/��

��7��D�18�� .�� E��%��0�=��

��$ ��%��0�,K��M��M � 1�� $�� 0�=�� 00�� 00=� E�� %�� /�� %�� 4�� !�� &,,-�� (

�� 9� �� 9� �� ;�� !�� 1��$��$�!2B+EF2��

D��$��3�� ,-(��(&&�� !��



�

�� # �") !�� "�7!��N��(�� O� �� O� �� N��

�� .�� !�� 5��4��(��F�� 5��(

�� G��A�� 8� A'��, �? ��*��? 1�� *��"�"��*�#"�!,�"�"� ��, � ��,��*�7��"��

� !,��A�� ,�

(��> " �!,��'!�� B��$C��*�#"�!,�D��!�� "��&��

�73��"��

��#��(��K��;�� 2�� .��

��"��#�(��K�� !�� ;�� 5�� 7�� !��8� �� 9� ��9� ��9� ��9�

��9��9�� %�� !��%��(�� %�� '�� 5��

��%�� !��7A��8�!��$��'��O��7D�.2��(��8�!��8 ��*��

��O��%�8 ��

�

'��+ ��(��-��

7��(�� '��%��(

�� %��

!��%��%��%�� 4��%�� K��

�� K�� M��M� �� M�%��M� �� %��(��K�� 8

'��+ ��-��6 �"� �

� ��7E��%�� '��N�� %(�� (

�� 4�� (��;�� !��(�� (

�� 7��8��(��7��8�� 8�7�-�7��>�!,



!�� *�, " ��1"�

��!�� , �*��1��3��@��E��!� ��DD� �! ��1��*��))��)��

��@��E��!� ��DD��-��

�B��&.��@��DD��

�B�@��.��DD��")��!��"��,"��*�"�� *� ��(��!� ��")��"��

� ��"�

�B�@��&�DD�� )��"� ��

�B�@��.��DD�� )��*��,"�� !��*��1�

�B�@��&��DD��)��!�� *�" ��*��

�B�@��$�DD��")��!��7��

�B�@��DD�7��

�B�@��E��DD��"!��"�� *��*��

.��@��EB&�DD��!��*�� )��*��,"�

.��@��EB��DD��")��!�� * � �1�,�!��,"�

&��@��&�B�DD�6,�"� ��1 ��)�� !��"�

�B�@��DD�5��"� ��!��!�

�B�@��&�DD��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD��) ��1�,��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��&�DD�> ��"��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD�'�"��!��!�� "��!��*��!��*�� "�� "��

��

�B�@��E�DD��) �� ; �!�" ��*��,"�� )��)� � ��"��!��

��) � �� * � �1�,�"� �

�B�@��%��DD��*�) �F��)��!��, ��!��) �F��

�"E��#��PPPPPPP�"��%# ��

�

��>7��'?��

�� %��4��%��

�� "��#�PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��"��# �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��1�� PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�$��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��PPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��&,PP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��3��24� �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��I�� .��.��$��/��I�� $��Q�&,�,�"!��

��&,�,��.��.��$��/��I�� #�

Stan J. CaterboneStan J. Caterbone

June 19, 2015

Pennsylvania

Lancaster

19 June 15

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 Don't Know When

SJC



THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007



THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007



recorded 15-3400 lambert appeal exhibit re document re mind control victims symptoms and...

Documents

mind control page

sponsored mind control

district court case

mind control victims

lambert appeal

united states district

appellants obligation

appellants pleas