recreational carrying capacity assessment for the chikly island and surroundings (tunis)
DESCRIPTION
RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE CHIKLY ISLAND AND SURROUNDINGS (TUNIS). María José VIÑALS Imma MARTÍNEZ Aida ABDENNADHER Maryland MORANT Lola TERUEL. 1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES 2 RESEARCH SOURCES AND METHODS Field inspections (two field trips) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE CHIKLY ISLAND AND SURROUNDINGS (TUNIS)
María José VIÑALSImma MARTÍNEZAida ABDENNADHERMaryland MORANTLola TERUEL
1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
2 RESEARCH SOURCES AND METHODS Field inspections (two field trips) Collecting data Infrastructures and facilities analysis. Analysis of the current activities developed in the site. In-dept h interviews with stakeholders Analysis of comparative studies of the Spanish sites.
3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT Lagoon, Island and Fortress Spatial Analysis Study of the natural, cultural and scenic resources involved Critical revision of the recreational activities planned Visitors’ profile and behaviour study.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results from the Physical Carrying Capacity study Results from the Real Carrying Capacity study Results from the Effective Carrying Capacity Determining the Recreational Carrying Capacity and related-indicators.5 CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGERIAL GUIDE
6 REFERENCES
7 ANNEXES
8,13 KM
2,80 KM
6,45 KM1,39 KM
1,16 KM
1,43 KM
NORTH LAKE OF TUNIS
BIRDS HABITAT ZONING (NORTH LAKE OF TUNIS)
CHIKLY ISLAND
CHIKLY ISLAND (Constructions and Facilities)
FORT OF SANTIAGO
FAUNA & FLORA
HISTORIC BUILDING FORT OF SANTIAGO
FORT DU SANTIAGO
SCENIC RESOURCES: PANORAMIC VIEWS
SCENIC RESOURCES: PANORAMIC VIEWS
NORTH-WEST VIEW
SOUTH-WEST VIEW
SOUTH-EAST VIEW
NORTH-EAST VIEW
INTANGIBLE KNOWLEDGE REOOURCES: TRADITIONAL FISHING
1/ Interpretative Route in the Natural Reserve of the Chikly Island2/ Interpretative Visit of the Fort of Santiago3/ Birdwatching in the Northern Lagoon of Tunis
SUITABLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES
INTERPRETATIVE ROUTE IN THE NATURAL RESERVE OF CHIKLY
INTERPRETATIVE STATIONS 1/ Roman sites2/ Brackish Marsh areas3/ La Digue4/ Façade of the Fort
INTERPRETATIVE VISIT FORT OF SANTIAGO
BIRDWATCHING NORTHERN LAGOON
1.PHYSIOGRAPHIC UNITS MAPPING
5. RESOURCES INVENTORY AND APPLIED ASSESSMENT
2. NATURAL HAZARDS MAPPING
3. ACCES INFRASTRUCTURES MAPPING
4. AVAILABLE SURFACE FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
6. TERRITORY COMPETENCE MAPPINGZONNING
Spatial considerations
“The best place for hosting the planned activity”
Inventory and AssessmentIntrinsic Values: significance, representativeness and singularityRecreational Criteria: attractiveness, accessibility, fragility/vulnerability, feasibility, availability, educational values, and increasing awareness values
ZONING OF THE PHYSIOGRAFIC UNITS OF THE CHIKLY ISLAND
Circular Trail: 850 m x 2-3 m widthVisitor Spatial Standard: 4 m2
850 m x 2.5 m / 4 = 531.25
Coefficient of Land Use: 10%
531.25 /10= 53 Visitors
ZONING OF THE ACCESIBILITY OF THE FORT OF SANTIAGO
Access floor Main floor and court Terrasse Tower
EXHIBITION ROOMS IN THE MAIN FLOOR
6 Exhibition rooms about 8,00 m2 each oneVisitor Spatial Standard: 1,2 m2
8 m2 / 1,2 m2 = 6,66
Tower: 17,4 m2 / 1,2 m2 = 14.5
Ecosystems and Habitats to conserve Mapping
SUITABILITY FOR USE MAPPING
Physical and ecological, cultural and social Impact
Analisys due to the activity or users
Vulnerability Mapping
TERRITORY COMPETENCE MAPPING
“The best place for hosting the planned activity”… …where causes the least impacts
Limiting Factors - Analysis of the site
conditions (space limiting factors)
- Physical and ecological factors (Impacts study)
- Social factors (Visitors’ Psychological Comfort)
NESTING AREAS ZONING(Ecological limiting factor)
Visitor Spatial Standard: 10 m2 (instead 4 m2) in order to protect nests close to the trail. 850 m x 2.5 m / 10 = 212.50
Coefficient of Land Use 10%: 212.50 / 10= 21 Visitors
ISLAND VISUAL IMPACTS ZONING(site conditions limiting factor)
High Visual Fragility of the Island
20 Visitors is a large number of people to be held in an interpretation station (Group size: maximum 10 people)
Visitors themselves cause visual impacts (2 groups can’t visit at the same time the Island)
1 group visiting the Island1 group visiting the Fort
EXHIBITION ROOMS (site conditions limiting factor)
Reading focal length: 0,70 mWindows Safety distance: 0,70 m Final Available Surface: 2,00 m2
Visitor Spatial Standard: 1,2 m2
2 m / 1,2 m2 = 1,66
TOWER OF THE FORT OF SANTIAGO(Site conditions limiting factors)PhCC:Tower surface: 17,4 m2
Visitor Spatial Standard: 1,2 m2
17,4 / 1,2 = 14,5 people
RCC:Activity limiting factors: Space Availability in the front lineSpatial reference: available perimeter: 3,5 mVisitor Spatial Standard: 1,0 m 13,5 / 1,0 = 13,5 birdwatchers
(Managerial limiting factors)
Standars indicate the minimal acceptable conditions for the site. Fauna / Vegetation / Water / Landscape / Hitorical building
An Indicator is a type of performance measurement used by the administration to evaluate the established conservation standards
- Determining the Conservation Standards- Reinforce the preventive protection measures - Establish access restrictions in special periods
(nesting, etc.)- Set up physical barriers in order to protect roman
remains- Write a Ethical Code - Prepare a Management Plan - Implement an Interpretative Programme- Control the boat speed - Improve site facilities- Develop an integrated signage system - Facilitate the basic services (first aids, telephone,
chemical WC, drinkable water, etc.)- To provide the site with 2 wardens (1 day / 1
night) + 1 guide-interpreter (ToR must be writen)- Economic and material needs for conservation
purposes and for recreational uses must be evaluated
- Finantial strategies must be studied - Public-privat partnership implemented
EFFECTIVE CARRYING CAPACITITY RECOMMENDATIONS