recruitment and selection session 7 - february 26

31
Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Post on 19-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Recruitment and Selection

Session 7 - February 26

Page 2: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

“What’s difficult about hiring people?” Suppose you work for a company and in

charge of hiring new employees. Consider these problems:

What if you somehow you don’t seem to attract the right employees (or too few)?

What kind of questions to ask during an interview? Applicants only give socially desirable answers: they are team players, hard working etc.

Page 3: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Agenda

Recruitment Selection

Page 4: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Difference Recruitment and Selection Recruitment: the process through which the

organization seeks applicants for potential employment.

Selection: the process by which the organization attempts to identify applicants with the necessary knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics that will help the organization to achieve its goals.

Page 5: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Recruitment Recruitment is necessary to:

Fill vacancies created by departures (vacancy chain) Staff new positions generated by growth

Recruitment however may not be perfectly matched to positions available Analysis of labor needs (HR planning) and over-recruit

current situation Recruit when openings occur Promote internally

Page 6: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Recruiting Yield Pyramid

Offers Made (2 : 1)

New Hires

Candidates Invited (4 : 3)

Candidates Interviewed (3 : 2)

Leads generated (6 : 1)1,200

200

150

100

50

Page 7: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Yield Ratios Applied to screened 6:1 Screened to interviewed 4:3 Interviewed to offered 3:2 Offered to accepted 2:1 Overall yield ratio

144:6 or 24:1 or 1200:50

Page 8: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

How many will be hired in a pool of 300 applicants? Is this pool size enough if there are three vacancies?

Different sources may have different yield ratios

Yield Ratio

Page 9: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Evaluating Recruiting Sources

Table 5.3

Page 10: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Your Experience? How did you learn about your current or past job?

a. Advertisement in newspaper

b. Referral from friend or relative

c. Internet search

d. Signs posted on workplace or elsewhere

e. Called by a recruiter

f. Other

Page 11: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Pros and Cons Referrals

Eases burden on recruitment process and cheap Likely to have a better fit Con: sometimes associated with nepotism

Advertising in newspapers Large pool of applicants, which can make

selection process complex. Difficult to target to particular segments.

Page 12: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Pros and Cons Online recruiting

Cheap and can be done either on the company’s website or at a career website (e.g. Monster.com.hk)

But may be difficult to target to particular types of applicants

For more specific target groups: Executive search firms (headhunters) Universities

Page 13: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Agenda Recruitment Selection

Page 14: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Selection Will provide information that is reliable and

valid and can be generalized to apply to the organization’s group of candidates

Should measure characteristics that have practical benefits for the organization

Must meet legal requirements in effect where the organization operates

Page 15: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

MGTO 121 Revisited! Decision-making biases

Halo effect Horn effect Contrast effect Similarity-attraction Primacy and recency effects

All these biases could affect personnel selection

Page 16: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Some solutions to assessment bias Three different approaches of solution based

on different definitions of bias have been proposed Unqualified individualism Quota Qualified individualism

Page 17: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Unqualified Individualism Use test to select the most qualified individuals they

could find The goal is to predict those who would perform best

on the job or in school If race or gender was a valid predictor of

performance, the unqualified individualist would see nothing wrong with using these variables for assessment and selection

Page 18: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Quota Explicitly equalizing race and gender

differences Population has 20% minority groups, then

20% of the employees or students must be from the minority groups

Page 19: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Qualified Individualism Compromise between unqualified

individualism and quota It selects the best qualified people But it does not take information about race,

gender, and religion into consideration for assessment and selection

Page 20: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Legal Issues: Equal Opportunity Core Principle: Recruitment and selection need to be

undertaken without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Applicants with better qualifications should have a higher chance of getting the job.

Female

Male

Qual. Qual.

Female

MaleQual.

Female Male

DISCRIMINATION REVERSE

DISCRIMINATION

AFFIRMATIVE

ACTION ?

Page 21: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Example: Johnson case Both Paul Johnson and Diane Joyce applied for the

position of road dispatcher, a job dominated by males.

Both had about 4 years of work experience, but Diane Joyce’s experience was a bit more recent.

Paul Johnson scored 75 on an graded oral interview, Diane Joyce scored 73.

Diane Joyce got the job, and Paul Johnson claimed reverse discrimination.

Court ruled it was lawful because never before had a woman held the position of road dispatcher.

Page 22: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) in Hong Kong

Established in 1996 Goals

To work towards the elimination of discrimination on the grounds of sex, marital status, pregnancy, disability and family status.

To eliminate sexual harassment, and harassment and vilification on the ground of disability.

To promote equality of opportunities between men and women, between persons with and without a disability and irrespective of family status

Page 23: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

EOC implements three Ordinances to achieve these goals Sex Discrimination Ordinance Full text Disability Discrimination Ordinance Full text Family Status Discrimination Ordinance Full text

Some of the laws are highly relevant to the HR context

Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) in Hong Kong

Relevant sections SDO: S7, S8, S11, S12, S13, S18, S19, S20, S23, S24.Relevant sections DDO: S11, S12, S13, S18, S 19, S20, S22, S23, S83.Relevant sections FSDO: S8, S9, S14, S15, S16, S20.

Page 24: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Interviews Nondirective interview

The interviewer has great discretion in choosing questions to ask each candidate

Structured interviewConsists of a predetermined set of questions for the

interviewer to ask

Page 25: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Interview Types Situational interviews

The interviewer describes a situation likely to arise on the job, then asks the candidate what he or she would do in that situation

Behavior description interview The interviewer asks the candidate to describe how he or

she handled a type of situation in the past. Pros and cons of each?

Page 26: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Interviewing Advantages

Can provide evidence of communication and interpersonal skills

Most valid when they focus on job knowledge and skills. Disadvantages

Can be unreliable Low on validity Costly Subjective/biased

Page 27: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

How Organizations Select Employees Multiple Hurdles

Establishing a minimum score for each employment test thereby gradually narrowing the candidates down

Example, passing scores are: Math test - 70% Conscientiousness test - 90% Interview - 80%

Applicant A: Math 80%, Conscientiousness, 92%, Interview 85% = Eligible to Hire?

Applicant B: Math 60%, Conscientiousness, 95%, Interview 95% = Eligible to Hire?

Page 28: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Selection at Goldman Sachs “It begins in the recruitment process, long before a

formal offer is extended. Brains are not enough. The first couple of interviews determine whether a candidate meets the firm’s intellectual standards; the remainder, where far more candidates stumble, are used to determine “fit”. It is a grueling process that tests endurance as well as aptitude. Those candidates who do not evince a scorching ambition, total commitment, and an inclination for teamwork are quickly weeded out”.

From: Endlich, L. (1999), Goldman Sachs: The Culture of Success. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Page 29: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Compensatory approach Scores on all predictors are added together, allowing a higher

score on one predictor to offset a lower score on another predictor. Example, Total points must equal 200:

Applicant A: Math 60, Conscientiousness 100, Interview 90 = 250 points

Applicant B: Math 95, Conscientiousness 75, Interview 80 = 250 points

Applicant C: Math 50, Conscientiousness 65, Interview 80 = 195 points

Who is eligible to hire?

How Organizations Select Employees

Page 30: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Other ways of selecting employees Competitions!

Main prize: A position at Microsoft Shanghai Google case (end of Chapter 6, p. 203)

Page 31: Recruitment and Selection Session 7 - February 26

Hot Seat Case Introduction

Diversity in Hiring:

Candidate Conundrum