REGION V

Work Plan Memorandum forIndustrial Excess Landfill Site

Uniontown, Ohio

Document Number 157-WP1-WM-AQZF-1

January 1985

? as-

COM CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

environmental engineers, scientists. ^S N°"h 1Z4th Streetplanners, & management consultants Brooktield. Wisconsin 53005

414 781-4590

January 15, 1985

Mr. Richard E. BarteltRegional Project OfficerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency230 South Dearborn StreetChicago, Illinois 60604

Mr. Jay D. PlucinskiRegional Site Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency230 South Dearborn StreetChicago, Illinois 60604

Work Assignment No.: 57-5LW2

EPA Contract No.: 68-01-6939

Subject: Work Plan Memorandum for Industrial Excess LandfillUniontown, Ohio

Document No.: 157-WP1-EP-AQZE-1

Dear Messrs. Bartelt and Plucinski:

Camp Dresser & McKee is pleased to submit this Work Plan Memorandum for theIndustrial Excess Landfill site located in Uniontown, Stark County, Ohio.

The Work Plan for the Industrial Excess Landfill site will follow closelythe Scope of Work ( S O W ) provided by USEPA under Work Assignment Number57-5LW2. There are no substantive exceptions to the Scope provided byUSEPA for this Work Plan Memorandum. Additions or deletions to this SOWwill be discussed with Mr. Plucinski and rationale for a modification tothe SOW included in the Work Plan.

Please note that the costs presented in this memorandum are based on costsdata for C.C. Johnson and Associates Inc. and represent direct and indirectcosts, without base fee or award fee. The detailed costs and fees will bepresented in the Work Plan and will be supported by optional forms 60 foreach REM II Team firm's participation in the work assignment.

It has been determined that no conflict of interest exists for the Regionaland Site Managers for this work assignment. Also, it has been determinedthat no organizational conflict of Interest exists for C.C. Johnson andAssociates Inc. Signed conflict of interest statements are included asAttachments F-lf F-2 and F-3.

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

Mr. Richard BarteltMr. Jay D. PlucinskiJanuary 15, 1985Document No.: 157-WP1-EP-AQZE-1

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Very truly yours,

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

W, Hawthorne, P.E.n V, Manager

Approved:

d F. Do<le,echnical Operations Manager

JWH/cam

Approved

Kmathan G. Cupfis,'Finance and Wmini stration Manager

cc: V.A. Joiner, Contracting Officer, USEPAW.M. Kaschak, Project Officer, USEPAN.M. Willis, Regional Coordinator, USEPA

Receipt by EPA Region V Acknowledged: Exceptions Taken

Regional Project Officer Date Yes No

Tte Project Officer '/ Date

Explanation of exceptions attached

Tes

Yes

Routing of Acknowledgement:

Return original to REM II Site Manager - Sidney F. Paige

Copies to:REM II Project Officer - W.M. KaschakREM II NPMO - J.G. Curtis

No

7777/3/19

JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS

January 14, 1985

Mr. John W. HawthorneREM II Regional Manager, Region VCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.11 East Adams Street, Suite 1500Chicago, Illinois 60603

Subject: Work Plan Memorandum for Industrial Excess LandfillWork Assignment No.: 57-5LW2Project: EPA Contract No. 68-01-6939Document No.: 157-WP1-IO-ARDD-1

Dear Mr. Hawthorne:

We are hereby transmitting to you the Work Plan Memorandum for theIndustrial Excess Landfill Site.

There are no substantive exceptions to the scope or budget hours estimateprovided by USEPA for this Work Plan Memorandum. We have revised theorder of the USEPA assigned tasks to conform to the REM II standard taskslist.

If there are any questions regarding the enclosed material, please contactme.

Very truly yours,

C. C. JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Sidney F. Paige, D. Env.REM II Site Manager

SFP/alo

Enclosures

11510 GEORGIA AVENUE • SUITE 220 • SILVER SPRING. MARYLAND 20902 • (301) 942-5600

TABLE OF CONTENTSWORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

FORINDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL SITE

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYUNIONTOWN, OHIO

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 SCOPE OF INITIAL SERVICESTask 1.0 Prepare Work Plan MemorandumTask 2.0 Description of Current Situation

Subtask 2.1 Obtain and Evaluate Existing InformationSubtask 2.2 Prepare Compiled Site Map(s) and Confirm

EPA GraphicsSubtask 2.3 Perform Initial Site CharacterizationSubtask 2.4 Prepare Existing Conditions Memorandum

Task 3.0 Prepare Project Plans

Health and Safety PlanQuality Assurance Project PlanQuality Assurance ProtocolsSite Management PlanSampling and Analysis PlanData Management PlanCommunity Relations Activit ies

Task 4.0 Prepare Work Plan

Subtask 4.1 Prepare Draft Work PlanSubtask 4.2 Agency ReviewSubtask 4.3 Prepare Final Work Plan

Technical and Financial Management

3.2.1

Subtask 3.1Subtask 3.2SubtaskSubtask 3.2.2Subtask 3.2.3Subtask 3.2.4Subtask 3.3

Task 5.0

3.0 BUDGET

4.0 SCHEDULE

5.0 KEY STAFF

6.0 ATTACHMENTSA. Labor CostsB. ExpensesC. Schedule of ActivitiesD. Schedule of DeliverablesE. Site Manager's ResumeF. Conflict-of-interest Declarations

Page

1

11

1213

13

14151618181819

19

192021

21

23

23

23

7777/3/20

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Work Plan Memorandum describes the initial tasks to be performedat the Industrial Excess Landfill Site in accordance with USEPA 's WorkAssignment Number 57-5LW2.

The Industrial Excess Landfill, located at 12646 Cleveland Avenue,N . W . , {aka 12464 Cleveland Avenue, N . W . ) , Uniontown, Lake Township, StarkCounty, Ohio, is presented in Figures 1 2, and 3. The Landfill is on a29.86 acre area and was operated as a dump-site from approximately 1966 to1980, when it was closed pursuant to court order.

From May 24, 1968, to date, the property where the Landfill is locatedhas been owned by Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc., an Ohio corporation.The property had been transferred to Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. byCharles and Merle Kittinger, who acquired title thereto from Richard andJanet Sheets in 1966.

The site may have been originally used as a coal mining operation,with some deep mine shafts. In latter years, when operated as a sand andgravel pit, a large quantity of sand and gravel were mined and removed fromthe area.

Soil tests done in the 1960's and 1970's of the site area, above theground water table, demonstrated a very mixed soil condition. Test holesmade and analyzed in 1973 of the eastern, low level sections of thedump-site, primarily indicate a sand and gravel composition, with somerelatively thin layers of clay in certain locations. Well logs of the sitefrom 1970 also indicated a very high sand and gravel composition of soilwith a static water level/depth to water of approximately 30'. Based upona test hole engineering report of this site, completed in 1973, groundwater levels in some areas of the dump site are a mere 5' or less from thethen existing surface, which of course, is now the bottom level of thedump-site and the commercial and industrial waste contained therein.

1

North Canton QuadrangleOhlo-7.5 Minute Series

V-V ' >'- •• r.A\^v , ,"/- ' f -JVU. !-*?7rri= -

= >: A V V. 3r =irO>J:?: &- • i J-:ii iJste Residence

>~"' • ' Pfif^JA^.. "v •• M&Residence

Residence

,. m* SR• ' J '.(~> "•*<*»'.' ' I.. ~^\ **. JT^^t^C} i J •

Figure 1. Site locations and locationof five residential wellssampled.

\ \ ?* ©;*

' • \ x v

*-' BORING LOCATION PLAN ,•

" ; _ x \ • • i •ft ; ^ INDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL H ** \'• ' t ',w -- . _* \ \ M i !

)1P ^<l i • tb ^:«?

Ul

k » * * 1 1 *^"^ > t » * i

J\ \ \ \ * \!

\ :-^\;V^l^.---"\ V\v \ v;

k * ^

r *J

:>—

16'u>

Id^JO=!zr<I

1314

CO ?

TCH CUBBOARD REST.-*• • .' - . » • - • i i__* .*. * • • i 4—J • •« • ». . —

'" «COM).ERCIAL TIRE CO.

LFG-1

aQ

v.

O

<t>

«D

LFG-2

-GG-1

GG-2

i -

i..

1 * • * • -' '• .—» • « I ! * » ' *S /' / *> '. ••» tf * / • * ! • ^"™ * ^ -^ * ^ r

* * LJ, '. ,-*'.' ^. \ » .'. ****'"• " ' • ' » , 11'. »* *.^*"• / */'' .' •*.."*'•.'•'•;:.•••'/ irfC*'-*r-T

^'~ ^— *r^*'•'.'A.'"/-'Vyv^^v *""

'V :' \ *. Methane Sampling Survey. 4-27-84~v--

Points sampled byEast Ohio Gas -I

r-trrJT.Vx*:.-.. Figure 2. Site location showing gas

V

— LAKE TWP.. STA8K COUNTY

ASSOCIATM

The original topography, when the property was converted to landfilluse, was contoured in such a way so as to slope from the western edge ofthe property where the elevation was approximately 1178.5' at its highestpoint, to the eastern edge of the property where the elevation wasapproximately 1117.3' at its lowest point. At its lowest elevation astream commonly known as the Metzger Ditch f lows in a southerly directionalong the eastern edge of the property.

Cover, during the operation of the Landfill, was obtained from thehigher western section of the land, and perhaps as much as 60' or more of

earth was removed from the original surface of the western edge to thebottom of the landfill floor, thus indicating that fill in this area is atleast 60' deep.

According to the bonding schedule required during the Landf i l l 'soperation, materials were filled in the dump-site in a several step

process. The north and western most acres were filled first, while thesite was gradually filled from 1966 to 1980, when it was ordered closed, ina north and western to south and eastern direction. During this time,cover for each day's or week ' s fill was obtained as aforesaid from thewestern edge of the property, which, of course, was among the last of theproperty to be filled.

Surface waters, based upon the present topography of the land, flowover the dump-site in a northwest to southeast pattern and into theexisting Metzger's Ditch, which ultimately flows into the Tuscarawas River.Ground water, according to the latest information, flows in a southern orwesterly direction. The ground water under the dump-site is a mere 5' orless from the bottom of the wastes buried in the landfill itself.

From 1968 to 1972, daily solid-waste volume at the site, for example,increased from 200 Tons a day to 375 Tons a day. Aside from solid waste,substantial quantities of chemical, liquid waste were dumped at this site.

For example, in 1969, chemical liquids were reportedly being dumped at thissite at the rate of perhaps as much as 27,000 gallons per week. By thetime liquid dumping was ordered stopped by the Stark County HealthDepartment in 1972, liquids were being dumped at the rate of 11,000 gallonsper day.

Although a great deal of liquid waste was alleged to be latex, or oil,much was also a vareity of solvents or industrial chemicals, often with

foul odors or explosive qualities. Frequently, much of these liquids weredumped open on the ground from barrels or tanker trucks or buried at the

site in barrel containers. One heavy equipment operator, who provided adeposition to the Committee, who worked at the site from 1971 to 1977,estimates that perhaps as many as 60,000 or more barrels may have beendumped on the ground at this site, and that of these only about 25% were

latex. The contents of the remaining 45,000 barrels, as he described inhis statement under oath, were unknown. Some were extremely flammable,while others had foul odors. In addition, he believed that perhaps as manyas 400 or 500 barrels, if not more, were buried at the site during histenure.

The dumping of chemical liquids was supposedly stopped by order of theStark County Health Department on January 24, 1972.

Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies are aimed at remedialactions that offer permanent remedies which prevent or control the releaseof hazardous wastes into the environment. The objectives for the Indus-trial Excess Landfill are to:

Determine the extent of landfilling.

Determine the nature and extent of groundwater, surface water, andsoil contamination on and adjacent to the site.

Assess the extent of offsite migration of contaminants and theirimpact on potential receptors.

Determine whether the site poses an imminent hazard to public health,welfare, or the environment.

Determine the safest, most cost-effective remedial actions.

Prepare a conceptual design of the remedial action selected.

7777/3/21

2.0 SCOPE OF INITIAL SERVICES

Task 1. Prepare Work Plan Memorandum

Objective: Prepare a Work Plan Memorandum describing the initialtasks to be performed regarding Work Plan Developmentfor the Remedia l Invest igat ion/Feas ib i 1 i ty Study( R I / F S ) for the Industrial E x c e s s Landf i11 si te.Identify the level of effort, associated costs andschedule of these tasks specified in the Work Plan.

Data Sources: As listed in Task 2

Del iverables: Work Plan Memorandum

Task 2.0 Description of Current Situation

Subtask 2.1 - Obtain and Evaluate Existing Information

Objective: Develop a database of existing available informationfor use in preparing the Work Plan for conducting theRemedial Invest igat ion ( R I ) and preparing theFeasibility Study (FS) .

Data Sources: Sources of information presently available from USEPARegion V file data are:

1. ERA Work Assignment for Industrial Excess Landfillsite. WA. No. 57-5LW2

2. Industrial Excess Landfill. A Report to theCommunity of Lake Township, Stark County, Ohio.Lake Township Trustees Commi ttee. September 7,1984.

3. Summary documents listing disposal activities ofPRP's at the Industrial Excess Landfill. A reportprepared by Techlaw Inc. Fairfax VA - November 1,1984.

4. Sampling Investigation Report of Five ResidentialW e ! 1 s Near the Industrial E x c e s s Landf i l l ,Union town, Ohio. Prepared by Ecology andEnvironment, Inc. January 1984.

5. Charcoal tube analysis, Industrial Excess Landfi l l .A report prepared by Roy F. We s ton Inc. RockyRiver, Ohio. October 18, 1984.

6. Landfi11 Gas Monitoring at Industrial ExcessLandfill, Uniontown, Ohio. A report prepared bySCS Engineers, Covington, Kentucky.

7. Legal briefs presenting testimony of individualsdescribing disposal activities at the site.

8. Other sources of information to be investigatedare:

o Ohio Environmental Protection Agencyo Ohio Health Departmento Lake Township Zoning Departmento Stark County District Board of Healtho Uniontown Fire Departmento Ohio Department of Natural Resourceso Geology Department, Cleveland State University

(Dr. Peter Clapham, Professor)o City of Uniontown records

o Local well drillerso Records from waste haulerso Landfill recordso ERA section 104 questionnaires to potentially

responsible partieso Other sources as appropriate

Assumptions: 1. Identified data sources wil l provide access to andfurnish required data for evaluation in a timelymanner.

2, Site data is valid with respect to QA/QC protocols.

Del iverables: Evaluation of avai lable and existing information toestablish a baseline data file of site conditionsto be summarized in the Ex is t ing Condi t ionsMemorandum (Interim Report) . A lso a chronologicalhistory of operat ions and response ac t i onsconducted at the site and a l ist ing of allmaterials known to have been deposited or stored atthe site will be prepared. The results of the datasources evaluation will serve as input into subse-quent tasks and shall consist of:

o General description of known or on-site andoff-site contamination

o Site character izat ion based on ava i lab legeological, hydrogeological, surface water, soiland air quality information

o Identification of technical and nontechnicaldata gaps

10

Subtask 2.2 - Prepare Compiled Site Map{s) and Confirm EPA GraphicsStandards

Objective: 1. Prepare site m a p ( s ) showing ex is t ing siteinformation. These maps will be used for fieldver i f i ca t ion of ex i s t i ng informat ion and siteconditions. The site maps will also be used toestablish the preliminary site boundary conditionsfor development of the Work Plan.

2. Obtain graphics standards from EPA for incorpora-tion into the final site maps and other graphics tobe included in the RI/FS.

Data Sources: o Existing site maps in the aforementioned September7, 1984 report on the status and activit ies of theIndustrial Excess Landfill Site presented to theCommunity of Lake Township, Stark County, Ohio.

o Quadrangle maps of the site

o Plat and property maps of the site

o Existing information developed in subtask 2.1

o Available historic and current aerial photographs

Assumptions: 1. Site survey information e.g., location of struc-tures, land features, property lines are valid.

2. Locations of sampling wells, borings, stations arevalid.

11

Deliverables: Compiled site map( s) as input into the Ex is t i ngConditions Memorandum and Work Plan.

Subtask 2.3 - Perform Initial Site Characterization

Objective: Conduct a site reconnaissance to confirm the existingsite conditions as shown on the compiled site map(s) ,to provide the on-site information necessary to preparethe Heal th and Safe ty plan, identi fy sens i t i vereceptors within the study area and to familiarize thesite manager and team members with the existing siteconditions.

Data Sources: 1. USGS Maps2. Maps depicting property boundaries3. Avai lable local survey information4. Information such as soil and hydrogeological data

presented in subtask 2.1

Assumptions: Site access will be arranged by EPA in a timely manner.Compiled site maps will be used to confirm exist inginformation and to be a base to develop detailedmapping to be accomplished in the Remedial Investiga-tion.

Deliverables: 1. Revised compiled site map(s)

2. Data to be used in Existing Conditions Memorandum(Interim Report)

12

Subtask 2.4 - Prepare Exist ing Conditions Memorandum (Interim Report)

A Memorandum report will be prepared by COM summarizing theinformation gathered and evaluated under sub task 2.1 and 2.3.Also included in this interim report will be a synopsis of ourobservations during the initial site visit, and the level ofprotection required for working on the site. Much of this detailwill be presented in the Site Personnel Protection & SafetyEvaluating Forms accompanying the Memorandum report.

Task 3.0 Prepare Project Plans

Objectives: To prepare those project plans necessary for theexecution of the work and to ensure that the work isconducted in a consistent manner that satisfies thereviewing and using agencies' requirements prior toexecution.

Data Sources: 1. Information collected from site files compiled inTask 2 and the initial site inspection.

2. REM II Guidance Documents

3. U.S. EPA Region V directives and procedures

4. State and local directives and procedures

5. U.S. EPA approved REM II Health and SafetyAssurance Manual.

6. Quality Assurance Program Plan for Performance ofRemedial Response Ac t i v i t i es at UncontrolledHazardous Waste Sites

13

7. Avai lable Community Relations Information preparedby others

Assumptions: 1. A Site Health and Safety Plan will have to bedeveloped in its entirety. The plan will beprepared using input from Task 2.

2. A Community Relations Plan will have to be preparedin its entirety.

3. The REM II approved programs plans will be used asguidance for developing the respec t i ve si tespecific project plans.

4. The format of the Qua! ity Assurance Project Planwill be that of ERA Region V as specified in EPARegion V Guidance Memorandum from the RegionalProject Off ice and clarified in meetings with theRegional V Quality Assurance Off icer.

5. Laboratory Quality Control will be performed inaccordance with the requirements of E P A ' s ContractLaboratory program.

Subtask 3.1 - Health and Safety Plan

A site-specific Health and Safety Plan will be prepared usinginput from Task 2.0. The plan will include:

o Personnel protective equipment requirements keyed to sitespecific location and activities

o Safety equipment inventoryo Training requirements

14

o Medical surveillance programo Personnel hygiene requirements

o Contingency plan and emergency procedureso Site personnel/activity safety monitoring programo Decontamination procedures

The plan will be organized to apply to all Remedial Investigation(RI ) field work and will be consistent with:

o Section III (c) (6) of CERCLAo U.S. ERA Order 144.2 — Health and Safety Requirements for

Employees engaged in field activit ieso U.S. ERA Order 1440.3 ~ Respiratory Protectiono U.S. ERA Occupational Health and Safety Manualo U .S . ERA Interim Standard Operat ion Safety Procedures

(September 1982)o Site Conditions

Subtask 3.2 - Quality Assurance Project Plan { Q A P P )

A site-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) will bedeveloped in accordance with U.S. ERA Region V Quality AssuranceProject Plan Guidance. Preparation of this document will betailored to the specific requirements for the project in thefield and in the o f f i ce . A n a l y s i s wi l l be performed inaccordance wi th the requirements of U .S. E P A ' s ContractLaboratory Program.

The site-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan shall include:

o Project Descriptiono Project Organization and Responsibilityo Quality Assurance objectives for data (precision, accuracy,

completeness, comparability, and intended use).

15

o Sampling procedures, locations, parameters, and numbers ofsamples.

o Sample custody procedureso Calibration procedures, references, and frequencyo Internal quality control checks and frequencyo Quality assurance performance audits, system audits, and

frequencyo Quality assurance reportso Preventive Maintenance procedures and scheduleo Specif ic procedures to assess data precision, representative-

ness, comparability, accuracy and completeness of specificmeasurements parameters involved,

o Corrective actiono Quality assurance reports to managemento Internal quality control checks and frequency

Subtask 3.2.1 - Quality Assurance Protocols

There are two QA/QC protocols that apply to the Industrial ExcessLandfill site: A Quality Control Plan that governs office workand deliverables, and a site specific Quality Assurance Plan thatcovers field and laboratory work. The types of reviews includedin the QCP are shown in Table 1. As part of the Work Plan, asite-specific list of deliverables and reviews will be prepared.An example that applies to this memorandum is included asAttachment D. The field analyses and sample collection shall bedone in accordance with accepted operating procedures andchain-of-custody procedures as provided by the U.S. EPA. TheQuality Assurance rev iew procedures regarding field andanalytical work will be presented in the QAPP for the IndustrialExcess Landfill Site.

16

Table 1

TYPES OF QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWS

QCP Activities Legend

A. Single Person Review and Signoff

1. Supervisora. Regional Managerb. Health and Safety Managerc. Technical Operations Managerd. Finance and Administration Director

2. Peer Review and Signoff*

3. Technical Expert Review and Signoff*(Identify Individual, provide resume, and schedule time)

B. Committee Review and Signoff

1. Assembled committee

2. Blind committee(appropriate technical disciplines must be identified, resumeprovided, chairman identified, and time schedule)

Signoff consists of approval signature block on the transmlttal pageof the deliverable signed and dated by the responsible party(les) orcommittee chairman prior to electronic submittal to the NPMO forapproval for release to the U.S. ERA region

Subtask 3.2.2 - Site Management Plan

A plan detailing project operations at the site, including siteaccess and security, contingency plans for other than sitepersonnel, and the general coordination and operational planningof act ivi t ies to be performed at the site will be developed.

Subtask 3 .2 .3 - Sampling and Analysis Plan

A site-specific sampling and analysis plan based on the findingsof the initial investigations phase will be developed. The planwill include sampling and analytical requirements for the RI/FSas part of QAPP. This plan will be developed in accordance withthe U.S. EPA approved Site Investigations Procedure Manual andthe Draft Site Investigation Protocol for Uncontrolled HazardousWaste Sites prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., December1984. The RI/FS program will include sampling of air, soil,surface water, sediment and groundwater. The Site Manager willrequest all primary data from the Central Regional Laboratory andwill provide a separate and independent evaluation of this data.Procedures for this verification will be identified in theSampling and Analysis Plan which will be part of the QAPP.

Subtask 3.2.4 - Data Management Plan

A Data Management Plan will be prepared for internal use to guidethe efficient management of the large quantity of data which willresult from this assignment. This plan will include:

o Data recording/gathering formato Data file type and locationo Data file control assignment {by individual) and sign-out

procedure

18

o Procedures/timing for return of information to file (e.g. , nodata left at work station overnight)

o Backup file procedures, requirements, locations and updatingperiods.

Standardized REM II Team procedures will form the basis for DataManagement Plan development and usage.

Subtask 3.3 - Community Relations Activi t ies

The Community Relations Plan preparation tasks will be performedand administered by ICF. These activit ies will be described in aseparate Work Plan submitted by ICF. The Community RelationsPlan will be prepared in its entirety since it is our understand-

ing that one does not presently exist.

Supportive act ivi t ies associated with the Community RelationsPlan that the REM II Team will perform are:

o Participation in public meetingso Provide information for press releases, fact sheets, and

technical summaries,o Prepare responsiveness summaries for records of decision.

A meeting will be held with USEPA Region V to discuss details ofthe Community Relations Plan prior to completing the Final WorkPlan.

Task 4.0 Prepare Work Plan

Subtask 4.1 - Prepare Draft Work Plan

Objectives: Prepare a Draft Work Plan detailing the scope, budgetand schedule necessary to conduct the RemedialInvestigation/Feasibi l i ty Study ( R I / F S ) using the

19

results and outputs of Tasks 2 and 3. The Work Planwill be developed following closely the Scope of Workfor the Industrial Excess Landfill site as provided byEPA under this Work Assignment. The Work Plan will bedeveloped to allow initiation of certain identifiedt asks based on limited EPA app rova l in order toexpedite the execution of the RI/FS work. The WorkPlan will also be developed, insofar as possible, toal low flexibility in the method of accomplishing thestated Work Plan objectives. These statements in theWork Plan will generally appear as IF statements.

Data Sources: 1. Outputs and information from Tasks 2 and 3

2. REM II Guidance Document

3. Statement of Work for the Industrial ExcessLandfill Site, WA-57-5LW2.

Deliverables: The draft Work Plan including scope, estimated budgetsand schedules for the Remedial Investigation andFeasibility Study for the long-term remedial actionaddress ing contaminat ion on-site and o f f -s i te forsoils, ground water, surface water, sediments, andlocal potable wells.

Subtask 4.2 - Agency Review

Objectives: 1. To interface closely with the EPA in discussing andreviewing the draft Work Plan prior to finaliza-tion.

2. To obtain timely EPA input and finalization.

20

Data Sources: EPA Region V and other state and local reviewingentities.

Assumptions: EPA will interface directly with other state and localreviewing bodies.

Deliverables: None

Subtask 4.3 - Prepare Final Work Plan and Obtain EPA Approval

Objectives: 1. To finalize the draft Work Plan with evaluation andincorporation appropriate comments, suggestions,and directives from EPA and other (state and local)reviewing bodies.

2. To obtain EPA approval for the entire Work Plan.

3. If EPA approval for the entire Work Plan cannot beprovided in a timely manner, obtain limi tedapproval for initiation of certain tasks which arenot dependent upon a re solut ion of unreso lvedissue(s) such as QAPP approval.

Data Sources: The results of Subtasks 4.1 and 4.2.

Assumptions: Timely review and approval of Work Plan by EPA

Deliverables: Final Work Plan for conducting the RI/FS for theIndustrial Excess Landfill site.

Task 5.0 Technical and Financial Management

Objectives; 1. Provide technical supervision for the project2. Prepare and submit monthly technical and financial

progress reports

21

Data Sources:

Assumptions

3. Attend progress meetings4. Conduct work effort quality control and Quality

Assurance audits5. Implement document control procedures and project

schedule controls6. Monitor schedule control project

1. Work Plan Memorandum2. Output from tasks 2 through 43. Management information system established for the

REM II Contract (REMIS)

1. Format adopted for REM II financial and managementreports are acceptable to EPA Region V.

Deliverables: Monthly Progress Reports will be prepared during theperformance of the initial tasks in conformance withstandard monthly report format.

7777/3/22

22

3.0 BUDGET

The costs assoc ia ted wi th the initial tasks are presented inAttachments A and B. Attachment A presents a summary of all costs

associated with the initial tasks and Attachment B presents a detailedbreakout of labor by category and task expenses and other direct costs

(ODC's) by Task. These costs are in accordance with our understanding ofthe requirements of this project.

4.0 SCHEDULE

The schedule of Activit ies by task and sub task is presented inAttachment C. As shown, we estimate that the final Work Plan will becompleted by April 12, 1985.

The Schedule of Deliverables is presented in Attachment D and showsdistribution and approval dates. We have not included distribution to anyidentified potential responsible parties; we look to your guidance in theseareas.

5.0 STAFF

1. Sidney F, Paige, C.C. Johnson and Associates Inc. will be the sitemanager for the Industrial Excess Landfill site assignment. Hisresume is included as Attachment E. He will work under thedirection of John W. Hawthorne, P.E., the Region V manager.

2. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. will provide direction and input onhealth and safety, quality assurance and on specific tasks asrequired.

3. ICF will prepare the Community Relations Plan and will providedirection and input into other Community Relations Activities asrequired.

4. Clement Associates will provide guidance on the exposure and riskassessment and on the endangerment assessment,

7777/3/23 23

ATTACHMENT A

UA Cod* _

WA Manager Na.e

SSAN 302-38-5914

Site Number

Site Naiie JMujitcial_E_xc&5.s Landfill

Phase WP1

Start Date ,J££26/84____ <4)

End Date 3/27/85 (5)

TASK

1.0 UORK PLAN MEMO

2.0 EVAL INFO

3.0 PROJECT PLANS

4.0 UORK PLAN

5.0 TECH/FINAN HGHT

T"l

' "i *'*'

TOTAL

US. SUMMARY UA«>

ProfessHours

50

300_— ___

152

220

36

——————

——————

758

(6)

ional*

S9SSSSSS

2430

10651

6104

8256

1692

— — —

29133

(7)

SupiHours

24

104

56

72——————

20

276

(8)

jort*

575

2494

1343

1726

478

6616

Equipment$

_ __ __300

300

———————

600_! —— _ _.(9) (10)

Travelt

240———————

1480

1960

1630

480

5790

ODC's»

300

875

750

725

175

2825— „ 1 _ — —(11) (12)

Sub-Pool*

— — — -——————

- ———— ~

—(13)

Indirect*

——————

(14)

Total$

3545

1522D

-10157...

2m

—————

44964

(2)

ATTACHMENT B

i t * ftrtwr: . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ P t i m : _ _ _ _ _ _ .

ite NM: ,Iad.U.strial..Excess Landfill n* ca*: A 1_2_I_Site Marnqer:. S. Paige

SSAN:. 302-38-5914Hat.: 1/15/85

!1 TASK1 ELEMENTf| a« •« mtfmtttmtif m»e . •»=«= g«» « gg=

11.0 HOIK PLAN HEW

[2.1 EXISTING INFO1 , - -

12.2 COMPILE SITE MAPS

12.3 SITE CHMMCTEt RATIONi ,

12.4 MEPAK EXIST COW HEW1 .

|3.1 HEALTH 1 SAFETT FLANI i i i i

13.2 DUALITY A-SM HAH

|4.1 DRAFT HOIK PUN1 .._„__,_.._„- ————— ......14.2 AGENCY IEVTEV1

|4.3 FINAL HOIK PLAN1 .

15.0 TECH/FItttN flWT,___,.—-___,-.—____—--.-__f

1i

1

1

1 i - i n

! TOTAL

Professional 458.68 */Hr.

Hours

26

B~ ———

B

16

16

B

24

16

8

34

16

170

1RIHV9-

15%

469

469

939

939

469

1408

939

469

1408

939

0

0

0

0

0

0

9976

Prof nsi mil 337.68 l/Hr.

Hour*x»2==rr

24

16

16

32

40

24

64

40

S

40

20

324

1«n«az=

9W

603

603

1206

1507,--.—.

»4

2412

1507

301, —— „

1507

754

0

0

0

0

0

0

12208

Professional 229.46 VHr.

Hours

40

16

20

32

8

24

32

IB

1B8

t

0

1138

453

569

911

228

6B3

911

0

455

•1

0

0

0

o

0

0

5350

Profusions! 1 Technical: TechMc.l 1 1 TOTAL TECHNICAL ! Clerical 3 [ Clerical 2 I Clerics: I-/*-. 21.03 I/Mr. 1 l/Hr. | U'E 1 1/Hr, 1 23.97 l/Hr. : t/Hr.

Hours

o————

* Hours

0

0

0 40

0

D

0

0

0 2*

r

0 12

0

0

0

0i

0

0

o 10 76

——— -„. ——

I | Hours

0— — -1— — —

0 1

°11 I0

0

0

0— - — I— — "

:05 |

0 t

252 |

0

0——"I—'-—

n

0

o I0 (

0

1598 0

* 1 Hours==„____,=„,__„

0 I 50— — -1— -— -

0 1 64i

0 ! 80

0 1 tB

0 1 ?Bi

0 1 40

0 1 112

0 1 112——— — I — — —

0 I 16

0 | 92— — "I— -— -

0 | 36^ _ _ _ _ _ |___ _ _ _

0 | 01

0 1 0

0 | 01

0 | 0— - — 1- ——

0 ) 0

0 | 0——— i ———

0 1 758_ ___ _. ___ t __ _ _ _ _ _ _

i | Hours

2130 )———I-

2-11 1— — — |- — — -

2369 1

2714 |_ I _-» ____

3357 I

1601 !

1503 |

?P^ I

771 •

3623 1

1692 t

0 1

fl 1I __— _

0 1— — — 1 -"—

0 !— — — | —— — -

0 I———!—— -

0 1— — — 1— -—

29133 | 0————— 1--- ——

t

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hours

21

40

.

8

48

16

40

10

32

20

————

276

1

575

959

192

192

1151

381

959—— —

959

0

767

4?1

0

0

0

0

0

0

6616

Hours

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

90

0— — —

0

0

0

0

0

0

.

Totil 11

Ho'jrs

"4

!04

0B

76

I3t

56

152

152

16

121

56

0

0

0

0

0

0

1031

— —— —-I* I

30' 5 I———--I

3179 |

2561 1---——-I

2906 |-____--.._ 1

4507 i— _ ..._-_|

1985 1

5462 |-— —— --I

1820 |————-I

771 1

4^0 1__ ————— |

2!7^ |-—-- —— "I

0 1-- —————— 1

0 !— - — — 1

0 1... ——— ...,

0 1-———I

0 1

0 f———-I

357« |

;:TASK.LM

ATTACHMENT B

Site Number: _J._5_7___________

Site Naie: _JjxdjjstciaJ_-EAQ.e£S_Landfi 11

Phase: _ypl______

HA Code: 1121

Site Manager: _S.__Paicie

SSAN: _3_02-38r

Date: 1-14-85

TASK

1.0 UORK PLAN

2.0 EVAL INFO

3.0 PROJECT PLANS

4.0 UORK PLAN

5.0 TECH/FINAN MGMT

— ""^ - 1 1 -

——— „_„„„„_,___TOTAL

_ _____ _ ____„ _ „__ _

Xerox

1

50———————

200

200———————

200— — — —

25

675

Blue-prints

==========75

400

200———— ——

200——————

875

Mail/Courier

$

100

.100

150__________

150

25———————

———————

525

Snoplies

*?5fc*-J

75

50

50

25

———————

O»J<J

Tele-phone

$

50

100

100

100

50

400

Computer

—*

———————

50

25

50

———————

125

———————$

_,. — — ___,»- — —

0____ _ _ _ _

G I A ( TOTAL11

* 1 «= = = = = - = = = - 1 ———— = —— = =:=—— ____ | ———— ____ ——

| 300——— - -—— 1—— —— ——

1 8751| 750

_ _ _ i ___ _1| 725

j 175

1 0

I 0

I 0_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _„-I

11 0

1 00 | 2825

——— ——— i ———— . ——E:WA.ODC

ATTACHMENT B

Site Number:

Site Name: _LQdU5irJAl__Excess__Landfi 11

Phase: _WP1_______

WA Code: 1121

Sit?

_302-j3_8-_5914_

Date: 1-14-85

TASK

1.0 WORK PLAN MEMO

2.0 EVAL INFO

3.0 PROJECT PLANS

4.0 WORK PLAN

5.0 TECH/FINAN MGMT

TOTAL

EquipmentI/day

Days

T

2

4

$

300

300

———————600

Per Diem Transpor-$90AJay | tation

Days

1

i£<

14

13

nij

—————————

32

r* ! $

90 1 150

ieo 1.3001,260 700

1.170 460

180 ! 300

S.tb-Pool

G * A* | Total0.0% I

$ ) * ( $

————————

— | -!

2,880————————

2,910

— _ _ _ _ —— , ——— _ — _0 | 240

-- — "!- " —0 | 1,780

I0 | 1,960

10 | 1 . 930

I0 ! 490

i0 | 0

0 | 01

0 I 01

0 | 0!

0 | 01

0 | 0_ — _, _ _ —

0 0 | 6,390 !. _ —— _ _ —————————— - —— t

E l W A . E X P

A Subcontractor oool excluded from GXA computation

CHEDULE OF ACTIVITIESATTACHMENT C

INDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL SITE

1.0 Work Plan Memorandum

2.0 Site Definition

2.1 Exist ing Information Evaluat ion

2.2 Compiled Site Map (s)

2.3 Site Character izat ion

2.4 Prepare Ex is t ing Conditions Memo.

3.0 Project Plans

3.1 Health and Safety Plan

3.2 Qual i ty Assurance Project Plan fs)

a.O Work Plan

4.1 Draft Work Plan

4.2 Agency Rev iew Meet'nq

4.3 Final Work Plan

Monthly Reports

* Meetings

DECEMBER

/ 4 11 IB 25

•

J A N U A R Y

1

••M

8

••••

15

••

••

••

E

22

•••

•B

=

29

^^^

^

——

*

FEBRUARY

5

••

^B

12 19 26

E

*

/

» A

MARCH

5 1 2 19

s.«.vfw;_ -*

26

-

*

/

APRIL

2 9 16 23 30

REVIEW AND DELIVERABLE SCHEDULEMO: WA

ATTACHMENT D

REOKJW. RCOKMAL MANAGER: 8ITE MA**QFB-

TASK

1.0 Work Plan Memo

2.0 Site Definition2.1 Eval. Exist. Info.2.2 Compiled Site Map(s)2.3 Site Characterization2.4 Exist. Conditions Memo

3.0 Project Plans3.1 Health & Safety Plans3.2 Quality Assur. Proj. Plan:3.3 Cormunity Relations Plan

4,0 Work Plan4.1 Draft Work Plan4.2 Agency Review Meeting4.3 Final Work Plan

Monthly Reports

REM II APPROVAL

Str

L/14

-V13-

>/4

2/102/152/15

2/18-

3/20

SV)i

1/14

-2/14-

2/5

2/112/182/16

2/22-

3/22

SoH

1/14

-2/15-

2/5

-2/182/16

2/22-

3/22

2<u.

1/14

-2/15-

2/5

-2/182/16

2/22-

3/2?

QUALITYCONTROLREVIEW

ACTIVITY

\.l.a,c&d

^.l.aH.l.a*.l.aA. 1. a

d.l.aibA.l.aicA.I . a

B.I-

A.I. a

A.I, a

DATE

1/14

-2/13-

2/4

2/102/152/15

2/18-

3/20

DELIVERABLEDUE TO EPA

DATE

1/16

1/252/191/302/6

2/152/222/22

2/253/54/12

Ongoing

EPA REVIEWCOMPLETION DATES

OQ.

1/23

2/12/26-

2/13

2/223/13/1

3/5-

4/4

OO

1/23

2/12/26-

2/13

2/223/13/1

3/5-

4/4

Oo.cr

1/23

2/12/26-

2/13

2/223/13/1

3/5-

4/4

OaV)a:

1/23

2/12/26-

2/13

2/223/13/1

3/5-

4/4

OTHER AGENCYREVIEW COMPLETION

DATES

«iQ_UJo

1/28

2/83/4

2/20

2/283/83/8

3/12.

4,49

* nnfll [TY MMIPflNCF rnnpnTNflTOR Prv iTW

ATTACHMENT E

C.C. JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.

SIDNEY F. PAIGE - PROJECT ENGINEER

EDUCATION BS (Chemistry) 1966, Antioch CollegeMS (Biology) 1970, George Washington UniversityMPH (Environmental Health Sciences) 1974, UCLAD. Env. (Environmental Science and Engineering) 1978, UCLA

REGISTRATION Registered Sanitarian (R.S.), State of California

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Mr. Paige has more than 18 years of increasingly responsible experience in theenvironmental field. He has provided technical support and limited projectmanagement in the areas of air pollution control planning, environmentalassessments, pollution control technologies, safety and health, and develop-ment of regulatory strategies for hazardous waste management.

He is currently working as an Environmental Scientist on the RI/FS project forthe Lang Property Site in New Jersey. This is a 10-acre illegal dump sitewhere approximately 1500 drums of waste materials were emptied on the ground.Surface water, groundwater, and soil contamination has been documented. Inthe past, he has served as task manager and key contributor to the developmentof the JRB Site Ranking Methodology, now used by the EPA. He prepared preli-minary designs and cost estimates for remedial actions prescribed by EPA foruncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites identified as Hyde Park, 102ndStreet, S Area and Love Canal. The results were used in the Department ofJustice suit and evaluated the land disposal technologies for land disposal ofhazardous wastes. He served as principal scientist on projects to assess themanagement practices of wastes generated by the chlorinated organic and otherselected organic chemical manufacturing industries. He has been an assistantprofessor of Environmental and Occupational Health Science, teaching courses inenvironmental epidemiology, environmental toxicology and environmental health.He has completed the 40-hour Hazardous Waste Site Investigation Trainingcourse.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Public Health Association, AmericanChemical Society, Environmental Sciences and Engineering Society (CharterMember), Society of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology

ATTACHMENT F-l

MEMORANDUM:

To:

From:

Date:

Project:

Document No,

Subject:

Action:

D.F. DoyleManager of Technical OperationsCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.One Center PlazaBoston, MA 02108

John W. Hawthorne

January 15, 1985

EPA Contract No.: 68-01-6939/NPM/NPMO

Staff Conflict of Interest DeclarationSite: Industrial Excess Landfill Site, Um'ontown, OhioWork Assignment No.: 57-5LW2

Immediate Response

I have reviewed the above work assignment for the U.S. EPA Contract68-01-6939, Remedial Response Activities at Uncontrolled Hazardous WasteSites. Based upon this rev iew and my understanding of the legalrequirements of this work, I certify that I have no known conflict ofinterest associated with this assignment based upon the known potentialresponsible parties or my past work experience with this site, if any.Also, I understand my professional obligation to inform any staff workingat my direction on this assignment of the conflict of interest requirementsand ensure that such staff have no such conflicts of interest.

Hawthorne,•esidentiV Manager

F.E.

cc: J.G. CurtisCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.7630 Little River TurnpikeSuite 500Annandale, VA 22003

ATTACHMENT F-2

MEMORANDUM COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

TO:

FROM:

DATE :

PROJECT:

DOCUMENT NO:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

J.G. CurtisCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.7630 Little River TurnpikeSuite 500Annandale, Virginia 22003

Charles C. Johnson, Jr.

January 14, 1985

ERA Contract No.: 68-01-6939/NPMO

157-WP1-CD-ARDF-1

Corporate Conflict of Interest DeclarationSite: INDUSTRIAL EXCESS

Immediate Response

The attached information provided by USEPA for the above NPL Site has beenreviewed for the US ERA Contract 68-01-6939, Remedial Response Activities atUncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites. Based upon this review and our under-standing of the legal requirements of this work, C.C. Johnson & Assoc., Inc.certifies that it has no known conflicts of interest based upon the knownpotential responsible parties, previous or ongoing work at this site orpotential organizational conflicts. We understand our professional obligationto ensure that the staff assigned to this work understand the legal implica-tions of these conflict of interest requirements and have no such conflicts.I am authorized by C.C. Johnson & Assoc., Inc. to sign this declaration.

x*

Signature Charges C. Johnson Jr

1/14/85Date

cc: D.F. DoyleManager of Technical OperationsCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.One Center PlazaBoston, MA 02108

MEMORANDUM

ATTACHMENT F-3

C.C. JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

PROJECT:

DOCUMENT NO.

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

Jonathan G. CurtisFinance and Administration ManagerCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.7630 Little River TurnpikeSuite 500Annandale, Virginia 22003

Sidney F. Paige, CCJA

January 14, 1985

EPA Contact No. 68-01-6939

157-WP1-CD-ARDE-1

Staff Conflict of Interest DeclarationSite: Industrial Excess LandfillWork Assignment No.: 57-5LW2

Immediate Response

I have reviewed the above work assignment for the USEPA Contract No.68-01-6939, Remedial Response activities at Uncontrolled Hazardous WasteSites. Based upon this review and my understanding of the legal re-quirements of this work, I certify that I have no known conflict ofinterest associated with this assignment based upon the known potentialresponsible parties or my past work experience with this site, if any.Also, I understand my professional obligation to inform any staff work-ing at my direction on this assignment of the conflict of interestrequirements and ensure that such staff have no such conflicts.

Signature

Sidney F. PaigeName

AK0-16