redhawk security - blair competition 2013

30
Miami University, Oxford Ohio Connor McDonnell | Jake Simon | Jed Sekaran | Kathryn Amato RedHawk Security A Leader in IT Security Services Discussion Materials: November 2013

Upload: jed-sekaran

Post on 08-Aug-2015

49 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Miami University, Oxford Ohio ▪

Connor McDonnell | Jake Simon | Jed Sekaran | Kathryn Amato

RedHawk SecurityA Leader in IT Security Services

Discussion Materials: November 2013

Page 2: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Executive Summary

Company Overview2

Industry Landscape7

Valuation Analysis9

Strategic & Financial Buyers18

Summary & Recommendation20

1

AgendaTable of Contents

Page 3: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Executive Summary

Page 4: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

A Leading IT Security Company

Executive Summary

Key Highlights

A full-service IT Security company that focuses on customer needs, customization, and overall protection

Attractive Story

Strong Financials &

Valuation

Summary

RedHawk Security and Sea Capital should engage in the process of a sell-side M&A transaction in order to seek an optimal exit opportunity with a strategic or financial buyer

The most ATTRACTIVE opportunity that would derive the highest implied

valuation would be a strategic exit

Implied Valuation Range: ~$528 - $633M

The most APPROPRIATE and ideal consideration however would be a

leveraged buyout with a financial sponsor

Implied Valuation Range: ~$296 – $340M

The Company continues to perform remarkably well:

Revenue CAGR 2010 – 2013E = 23%

EBITDA CAGR 2010 – 2013E = 13%

Strong and consistent free cash flow generation

After conducting several methods of valuation and case scenarios, RedHawk’s total AVERAGE implied EV valuation is within a range of

~$383 - $477M (low: ~$184M | high ~$849M)

RedHawk Security provides customized security services and infrastructure solutions that enable businesses to better protect data and digital information, which in turn allows businesses to focus their energy on accomplishing their long term goals and aspirations

Unique business model that provides a variety of information and data security solutions

Structure the “right for me offering” to meet customer needs, drive innovation, and enable greater manageability

Profound executive leadership with extensive industry expertise and track record execution

18.0% 16.0% 17.8% 16.4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

2010 2011 2012 2013E

Extensive Experience

Revenue, CAGR, Gross Margin

Possible Strategic and Financial Buyers

Company Industry

Paul Brown | President and CEO 13 23

John Harbaugh | Chief Financial Officer 1 8

Woody Hayes | Executive VP of Sales and Marketing 1 6

Jim Tressel | Executive VP of Service 10 18

Sean Payton | Chief Technology Officer 3 3

1

Page 5: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Company Overview

Page 6: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Leading independent, pure-play IT security value-added reseller (VAR) with a powerful business model

70.1%

14.1%

7.0%

4.0% 3.0% 1.8%

Products Managed ServicesConsulting MaintenanceTraining Project Management Office

Customizes and resells IT security software products to fit customer’s

unique structure and desires (act as a VAR)

Advises customers/suppliers about which products to purchase/sell

Offers full spectrum of consulting, maintenance and training to ensure

proper implementation and operation

Specific offerings include: data and security management, application

security, and security assessment

RedHawk Security’s Story at a Glance

Business Profile National Footprint Across All Regions

Revenue Sources (% of 2012 Rev.)

•$600+ million in revenue

•300+ employees

•2,500+ customers (including 50 of Fortune 100)

•125+ product suppliers

•1,250 annual consulting projects

•27 offices nationwide; HQ in Oxford, Ohio

•75+ security services offerings

Solid Positioning

•Industry leader in a high growth field within a diverse

set of vertical and horizontal industries

•Inclusive portfolio of products and services

•#1 channel partner for suppliers

•Blue chip and Fortune 100 & 500 customer base

•Incomparable financial performance

•Extensive industry experience with Management

Strong Business

Highlights

Office LocationOffice Location with Training FacilityHeadquarters

2

Page 7: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Security Services

Compelling Business Structure Able to capitalize on accelerating IT security demand due to inclusive services and solution offerings

Supplier

•Utilize RedHawk Security to market and customize IT products for companies across various sectors

RedHawk Security

•Personalize supplied software products for unique demands of customers

Customer

•Use customized software from RedHawk to protect data and proprietary information, while utilizing consulting and advisory services in order to maximize security effectiveness

Nationwide teamfocused ondeliveringsolutions acrossall service lines

Project Management OfficeAdvise companies

strategically across several service lines such as information

assurance andsecurity integration

ConsultingUnique programs that provide customized education services via multiple outlets

TrainingInclusive set of risk management, compliance, and cost reducing services

Managed Services

Regular maintenance checks to ensure optimal performance of supplier products

Maintenance

IT security products enhanced to fit customer unique needs in order to protect and prevent all organizations from security and information threats

Products

Comprehensive Portfolio of IT Security Offerings

Security Solutions

70.1%

14.1%

3.0%

4.0%

7.0%

1.8%

3

Page 8: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014P 2015P

Service

Product

18.0% 16.0% 17.8% 16.4% 16.6% 16.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014P 2015P

Historical Performance and Management Projections

Revenue, CAGR, and Gross Margin EBITDA Growth and Margin

Revenue Streams Adjusted Free Cash Flow

RedHawk consistently produces strong recurring results while providing assertive projections

4.4%3.5%

5.4%3.4%

4.9% 5.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

$0.0

$10.0

$20.0

$30.0

$40.0

$50.0

$60.0

$70.0

2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014P 2015P

$0.0

$5.0

$10.0

$15.0

$20.0

$25.0

$30.0

$35.0

$40.0

2010 2011 2012 2013E

Source: Company Material4

2010-2015P

CAGR

21.4%

20.5%

Page 9: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Significantly help drive the sales of suppliers

Connects established software suppliers with Blue-Chips

customers

Considered an “essential” partner with suppliers

Considered the #1 or #2 partner for their top 20

suppliers

Top 10 suppliers demonstrate longstanding tenure

Product Suppliers & Customer Base

Partnerships with Top Suppliers Diverse Customer Base Strong Customer Relationships

Strong business model is derived from partnership with suppliers and diverse customer base

Suppliers Customers

2,500 + total customers across multiple industry verticals

Customers includes 50 Fortune 100 accounts across a

wide variety of different industries

Over 90% customer retention

298 new customers were added in 1H 2013

Top 10 customers demonstrate strong revenue growth

with greater manageability after initial contact with

RedHawk

Other, 27%

Federal Gov't, 19%

Tech. 9%

Financial 6%

Healthcare6%

Education5%

MFG. 5%

Banking 4%

Consulting4%

State & Local Gov't 4%

Retail 3%

Insurance 2% Food & Beverage 2%

Legal 2% Utilities 2%

Source: Company Material5

REDHAWKSECURITY

Page 10: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Key Opportunities & Potential Risks

IT security spending for large Fortune 100 type companies have projected to grow at a rate of 3% going forward, while medium sized businesses plan to spend nearly 7 to 10% more

Red Hawk is only in contact with ~50 of the Fortune 100 companies and only 33% of Fortune 1000

This ultimately leaves a significant amount of market share for RedHawk to capture

Fortune Company Analysis

Noteworthy growth opportunities outweigh potential headwinds

Growth Opportunities Risks & Threats• Growing need for security awareness• Rising demand for cloud computing• Constant changes in customer needs for

anti-virus software and new infrastructure • “Big Data” requires innovative security

systems that are more risk-aware• Growth in demand for intellectual

property, financial integrity, and identities• R&D investments to support core solutions

• Significant momentum in M&A; opportunity to acquire smaller/niche companies

• Opportunity to gain market share within the Fortune 100 companies

• Increased need to protect proprietary information especially within healthcare and financial industry

• Geographic and international expansion due to growth from emerging markets

• Litigation if a third party asserts security firms infringing on intellectual property

• Products may fail to protect customers, in turn destroying reputation

• Economies and financial markets remain volatile which limits technological expansions

• Rapid technological changes within the anti-virus software industry

• Government regulations; compliance with new and changing laws

• Dependent on supplier products• Difficulties in addressing new viruses with

other complex computer security problems

• Poor operating leverage • New entrants within the industry • Competition from larger IT firms

Near-Term

Long-Term

Source: Company Material, Industry Research6

Page 11: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Industry Landscape

Page 12: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Billions of dollars are lost to cyber crime, data loss, and security breaches each year

The private sector is a main customer for IT security, with exception of the Government

In order to fully understand business risks and create a defensive system with awareness, automation and visibility, there is an increasing need for security consulting

IT systems are increasingly complex and continually evolving, which underscores the need for managing security products

Since consumers needs continue to evolve (software preference, performance needs, mobility, cloud, privacy) demand for innovation and IT security understanding will continue to last

Industry Landscape

It Security & Consulting Background Security Software Publishing in U.S. (Billons)

40%

40%

20%

Corporate Data Security

Security Threat Protection

Cost Reduction and Risk Management

IT Security & Consulting Revenue (Billions) Products & Services Market Segmentation

IT Security & consulting continues to develop further, enabling growth opportunities

$3.0

$4.0

$5.0

$6.0

$7.0

$8.0

2012 2013E 2014P 2015P 2016P 2017P

Source:: Industry Research, Investor Presentations7

$3.0

$5.0

$7.0

$9.0

$11.0

$13.0

2012 2013E 2014P 2015P 2016P 2017P

Page 13: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Overall industry trends establish a need for RedHawk’s services and solution offerings

Demand and Profitability Online storage creates vulnerability for proprietary data

Growing demand for security in finance and insurance sectors

Computer investment growth facilitates demand for more secure and defensive software

Mobile security software will provide high revenue growth in the next five years

Industry wide revenue growth attracts strategic newcomers/investors

Technological Changes Cloud computing adds complexity to IT environment

Management teams feel more comfortable hiring IT consultants to prevent security issues rather then risking breach

Increased IT and Security Breaches Hackers cause brand, reputation, and financial damage

High-profile security breaches have drawn public attention

Acquisitive Environment Companies will continue to focus on industry vertical specialization

Strategic buyers are likely to stay acquisitive for next 3-5 years

Sticky revenue, higher margins and a shift to the cloud push software deals ahead

Large companies continue to integrate hardware and software business segments

Recurrent deal activity from traditional buyers with increasing growth from non-traditional buyers

Deal value has recovered to nearly 15.0x in 2011

PE industry continue fundraising while deal flow activity remains constant

IT Security Growth

Drivers of IT Security Growth Industry M&A Activity

Incredibly Large Universe Drives Demand

Accounts • 5 billion decoy accounts

Email • 294 billion email messages daily

Web • 1 billion requests daily

Devices • Over 4 billion used daily

Online• Over 260 billion hours spent online per

month

Social

Media• Over 1.8 billion social networking users

Source:: Industry Research, Investor Presentations8

3.0x

5.0x

7.0x

9.0x

11.0x

13.0x

15.0x

17.0x

19.0x

2009 2008 2010 2011

Median Mean

Page 14: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Valuation Analysis

Page 15: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Comparable Companies SnapshotCompetitive landscape strongly relates well with RedHawk Security

Source:: Bloomberg9

LTM

EBITDA Revenue/LTM

EPS

/Est. EPS

2014E

/ LTM

EBITDA

/ LTM

Revenue

/2014E

EBITDA

/2014E

Revenue

Primary

IT Security Services & Solutions

SYMANTEC CORP SYMC US 25.13$ 15,749$ 17,553$ 1,883$ 6,947$ 1.08$ 21.1x 11.8x 8.4x 2.3x 6.0x 2.2x 10.8% 27.1% 1.1x 1.80

TREND MICRO INC TMICF US 38.14 3,973 5,273 382 1,157 1.42 30.2x 26.6x 11.8x 3.9x 11.6x 3.6x 16.3% 33.1% 0.0x 2.22

AVG TECHNOLOGIES AVG US 24.28 1,314 1,320 125 396 1.29 17.0x 10.4x 10.5x 3.3x 8.3x 2.7x 17.7% 31.6% 0.5x 0.40

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECH CHKP US 57.57 7,931 11,458 765 1,364 3.14 18.8x 15.5x 10.4x 5.8x 9.0x 5.3x 45.9% 56.1% 0.0x 1.58

FORTINET INC FTNT US 19.69 2,699 3,201 104 571 0.38 60.0x 35.1x 26.0x 4.7x 17.5x 4.0x 10.5% 18.2% 0.0x 2.49

Secondary

BI Software | Data Management | Consulting

COMPUWARE CORP CPWR US 10.85$ 2,263$ 2,329$ 158$ 946$ (0.08)$ 50.5x 18.5x 14.3x 2.4x NA 2.2x -1.9% 16.7% 0.1x 2.28

MICROSTRATEGY INC MSTR US 97.39 769 1,101 35 576 5.59 173.9x 51.0x 21.8x 1.3x 15.8x 1.3x 10.9% 6.1% 0.0x 7.61

CA INC CA US 29.75 12,261 13,557 1,837 4,626 2.30 11.9x 11.7x 6.7x 2.7x 7.4x 2.7x 22.7% 39.7% 0.7x 1.52

CITRIX SYSTEMS INC CTXS US 57.21 10,007 10,720 610 2,785 1.68 34.3x 16.6x 16.4x 3.6x 9.8x 3.0x 11.4% 21.9% 0.0x 1.28

JUNIPER NETWORKS INC JNPR US 20.82 8,688 10,481 658 4,469 0.59 30.6x 15.5x 13.2x 1.9x 7.1x 1.8x 6.7% 14.7% 1.5x 1.52

Minimum 10.85$ 769$ 1,101$ 35.3$ 395.6$ (0.1x) 11.9 10.4x 6.7x 1.3x 6.0x 1.3x -1.9% 6.1% 0.0x 0.40

Maximum 97.39 15,749 17,553 1,883 6,947 5.6x 173.9 51.0x 26.0x 5.8x 17.5x 5.3x 45.9% 56.1% 1.5x 7.61

Median 27.44 5,952 7,877 496 1,260 1.4x 30.4 16.0x 12.5x 3.0x 9.0x 2.7x 11.2% 24.5% 0.0x 1.69

Average 38.08 6,565 7,699 656 2,384 1.7x 44.8 21.3x 13.9x 3.2x 10.3x 2.9x 15.1% 26.5% 0.4x 2.27

Weighted Average Analysis

LTM

EBITDA Revenue /LTM

EPS

/Est. EPS

2014E

/ LTM

EBITDA

/ LTM

Revenue

/2014E

EBITDA

/2014E

Revenue

Primary 70% 32.96$ 6,333$ 7,761$ 651.8$ 2,086.7$ 1.5x 29.4 19.9x 13.4x 4.0x 10.5x 3.6x 20.2% 33.2% 0.3x 1.70

Secondary 30% 43.20$ 6,797$ 7,638$ 659.7$ 2,680.3$ 2.0x 60.2 22.7x 14.5x 2.4x 10.0x 2.2x 10.0% 19.8% 0.5x 2.84

LTM

Profit

Margin

LTM

EBITDA

Margin

Total

Debt

/EBITDA

PEG

Ratio

PEG

Ratio

Company Name Weight PriceEnterprise

Value

Market

Cap

Trailing

EPS

Price Enterprise Value

Price Enterprise Value LTM

Profit

Margin

LTM

EBITDA

Margin

Total

Debt

/EBITDA

Company Name Ticker PriceEnterprise

Value

Market

Cap

Trailing

EPS

Page 16: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Key Statistics

LTM Profit Margin

LTM EBITDA Margin

LTM EV/EBITDA

LTM

EV/REV.

Exceptional Performance Compared to Peers

Competitive Landscape

RedHawk surpasses most peers in strategy, vision, and operational performance

12.0x13.0x14.0x15.0x

PrimaryGroup

SecondaryGroup

RedHawk

1.0x

3.0x

5.0x

PrimaryGroup

SecondaryGroup

RedHawk

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

PrimaryGroup

SecondaryGroup

RedHawk

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%

PrimaryGroup

SecondaryGroup

RedHawk

Strategy & Vision

Ex

ecu

tio

n &

Pro

du

ct O

ffe

rin

gs

RedHawk Security

Source: Bloomberg, Industry Research, Investor Presentations10

Page 17: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

The analysis included 10 comparable companies split between

two groups (Primary and Secondary) within the IT Security

Services and BI Software/Consulting industries

A Weighted Average Analysis was conducted within the two

groups in order to derive suitable average (mean) multiples (EV

/ EBITDA and EV / Revenue)

After careful consideration regarding RedHawk’s market size,

service offerings, and competitive landscape, weightings for the

comparable analysis consisted of the following:

Primary: 70% (Security Solutions)

Secondary: 30% (Security Services: Consulting,

Management, Training)

Based upon the weighting, the analysis implies the

following implied valuation for RedHawk:

Comparable Analysis Summary

Public COMPS Valuation Overview Implied EV and EV/EBITDA: RedHawk

Peer Group EV/EBITDA

Peer Group EV/Revenue

RedHawk’s implied valuation derives a superior result

$100

$300

$500

11.7x 12.7x 13.7x 14.7x 15.7x

Mil

lio

ns

5.0x

15.0x

25.0x

1.0x

3.0x

5.0x

7.0x

Source:: Bloomberg11

2013E

Revenue

2013E

EBITDA

2014P

EBITDA 768.9$ 26.4$ 44.3$

Weighted

EV / 2013E Revenue 3.5x

EV / 2013E EBITDA 13.7x

EV / 2014P EBITDA 10.3x

Implied 2013E EV: 362.43$

Implied 2014P EV: 458.01$

Valuation Summary

Page 18: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

The analysis includes deal activity within the IT Security Services &

Consulting Industry within the past 6 years

The universe selection includes a total of 10 transactions: 6 strategic

and 4 financial

Two notable transactions are included within the precedent list;

however the key statistics are not included within our valuation

summary due to abnormalities

Precedent Transaction Environment

Universe Analysis

Historical transaction comparable set benchmarks a strong exit multiple

2013E EV & Exit Multiple: RedHawk

$200

$300

$400

$500

15.0x 16.0x 17.0x 18.0x 19.0x

Mil

lio

ns

Source:: Bloomberg12

Target Target Target Target Transaction Value

EV LTM Rev. LTM EBITDALTM EBIT / LTM EBITDA / LTM EBIT / LTM Rev.

7/2/2012 BreakingPoint Systems Inc IXIA Cash 160$ 160$ 40$ 8$ 7$ 20.7x 23.0x 4.0x

9/1/2011 Paradigm Holdings Inc CACI international Inc Cash 62 71 44 3 3 19.1x 22.3x 1.4x

7/15/2011 SAVVIS Inc CenturyLink Inc Cash 3,065 3,049 973 232 41 13.2x 74.1x 3.1x

9/13/2010 ArcSight LLC Hewlett-Packard Co Cash 1,485 715 195 26 32 27.6x 31.5x 3.7x

8/19/2010 McAfee Inc Intel Corp Cash 6,594 6,111 2,065 453 22 13.5x 21.7x 3.0x

6/29/2006 RSA Security EMC Corp Cash 2,035 1,828 340 45 NA 40.8x 61.9x 5.4x

Financial

6/2/2010 SonicWALL Inc Thoma Bravo LLC Cash 485 263 209 32 12 8.3x 11.7x 1.3x

5/4/2010 Sophos Apax Partners Cash 581 NA 365 64 NA 9.1x NA 1.6x

4/13/2009 Entrust Inc Thoma Bravo LLC Cash 99 66 96 9 14 7.8x 14.2x 0.7x

4/26/2007 Websense/Surfcontrol Vista Equity Partners Cash 401 530 359 54 15 9.7x 15.5x 1.5x

7/23/2013 Sourcefire Inc Cisco Systems Inc Cash 2,185 1,548 247 17 9 90.9x 172.0x 6.3x

9/22/2008 Secure Computing Corp McAfee Inc Cash 412 407 252 5 NA 89.8x NA 1.6x

High: 6,594$ 6,111$ 2,065$ 453$ 41$ 40.8x 74.1x 5.4x

Mean: 1,497 1,421 469 93 18 17.0x 30.7x 2.6x

Median: 533 530 274 38 15 13.3x 22.3x 2.3x

Low: 62 66 40 3 3 7.8x 11.7x 0.7x

Notable Transactions

Announced

DateTarget Company Acquirer

Payment

Type

Transaction

Value

Strategic

EV / EBITDA 17.0x

RedHawk 2013E EBITDA 26.4

Implied EV: 448.45$

Valuation Summary

Total Analysis 17.0x

Strategic 22.5x

Financial 9.0x

Strategic & Financial 15.7x

Average Exit Multiples

Summary of Mean 15.0x 16.0x 17.0x 18.0x 19.0x

Implied Enterprise Value: 395.6$ 422.0$ 448.4$ 474.8$ 501.2$

Mean 20.0x 21.0x 22.0x 23.0x 24.0x

Implied Enterprise Value: 528.0$ 554.4$ 580.8$ 607.2$ 633.6$

Mean 7.0x 8.0x 9.0x 10.0x 11.0x

Implied Enterprise Value: 184.8$ 211.2$ 237.6$ 264.0$ 290.4$

Total Analysis

Strategic

Financial

Page 19: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Base Case – Financials & AssumptionsSolid performance among historical and projected years

Assumption Justification:

Model represents base case financials with conservative estimates overall

2010 – 2015P Assumptions and projections based off managements financial guidance

2016P – 2018P Assumptions and projections based on conservative estimates that step past growth and margins a bit downward, if not held relatively constant

13

Historical Estimated

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Net Revenue 411.5$ 544.5$ 636.2$ 768.9$ 906.9$ 1,052.2$ 1,189.0$ 1,307.9$ 1,399.4$

COGS 337.5 457.3 522.8 642.7 756.7 881.4 998.7 1,105.2 1,189.5

Gross Profit 74.0 87.2 113.4 126.2 150.2 170.8 190.2 202.7 209.9

EBIT 11.9 11.9 27.2 19.3 37.4 49.4 54.8 59.5 62.6

D&A 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.1 6.9 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4

Adj. EBITDA 18.2$ 18.8$ 34.6$ 26.4$ 44.3$ 56.2$ 61.8$ 66.7$ 70.0$

CapEx (1.6)$ (5.3)$ (12.5)$ (6.9) (1.8) (2.6) (2.9) (3.2) (3.5)

Change in NWC N/A (0.3)$ (0.2)$ (0.7)$ (1.3)$ 0.3$ 0.5$ 0.6$ 0.7$

Growth

Revenue NA 32.3% 16.8% 20.9% 17.9% 16.0% 13.0% 10.0% 7.0%

Gross Profit NA 17.8% 30.0% 70.5% 19.0% 13.7% 11.4% 6.6% 3.5%

Adj. EBITDA NA 3.3% 84.0% 45.1% 67.8% 26.9% 10.0% 7.9% 4.9%

Margins

Gross Margin 18.0% 16.0% 17.8% 16.4% 16.6% 16.2% 16.0% 15.5% 15.0%

Adj. EBITDA 4.4% 3.5% 5.4% 3.4% 4.9% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1% 5.0%

Management Expectations Bank Expectations

Projected

Cost of Debt

Pre-Tax Cost of Debt 4.0%

Assumed Tax Rate 38.0%

After-Tax Cost of Debt 1.5%

Cost of Equity

Beta 1.07

Risk-Free Rate 2.7%

Market Risk Premium 7%

Small Stock Premium 2.5%

Cost of Equity 10.0%

WACC Calculation

Equity Weight 94.1%

Debt Weight 5.9%

WACC 9.5%

WACC Analysis

Financial Statement

Beta & WACC Calculation

Company Beta D/E Bu

SYMANTEC 0.98 11.9% 0.91

TREND MICRO 0.38 0.0% 0.38

AVG TECHNOLOGIES 1.06 5.0% 1.03

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE 0.88 0.0% 0.88 D/E Ratio 6.4%

FORTINET 0.94 0.0% 0.94 Tax Rate 38.0%

COMPUWARE 0.87 0.6% 0.87 Average Bu 1.07

CITRIX SYSTEMS 2.24 0.0% 2.24

MICROSTRATEGY 1.05 0.0% 1.05

CA INC 1.00 0.6% 1.00

JUNIPER NETWORKS 0.98 0.0% 0.98

Average Beta (Public Comprable Set) 1.03

RedHawk Security

Page 20: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (Base Case)Conservative case assumptions derive a high implied valuation for RedHawk

14

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Revenue 906.9$ 1,052.2$ 1,189.0$ 1,307.9$ 1,399.4$

EBIT 37.4 49.4 54.8 59.5 62.6

Taxes at 14.2 18.8 20.8 22.6 23.8

EBIT After Tax 23.2 30.6 34.0 36.9 38.8

Plus: D&A 6.9 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4

Tax Adjusted Unlevered Operating CF 30.1 37.4 41.0 44.1 46.2

Less: Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) (1.8) (2.6) (2.9) (3.2) (3.5)

Less: Increase (Decr.) in NWC (1.3) 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7

Free Cash Flow (FCF) 33.2$ 39.7$ 43.5$ 46.7$ 48.9$

Date of Cash 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018

Exit Multiple Method

Terminal Value 944.6$

Cash Flow (FCF) 33.2$ 39.7$ 43.5$ 46.7$ 48.9$ 944.6$

Present Value of Cash Flow 30.3 33.1 33.1 32.5 31.1 600.0

Perpetual Growth Method

Terminal Value 716.7$

Cash Flow (FCF) 33.2$ 39.7$ 43.5$ 46.7$ 48.9$ 716.7$

Present Value of Cash Flow 33.2 36.3 36.3 35.6 34.0 498.5

Exit Multiple Perpetual Growth

Implied Enterprise Value 760.2$ 673.9$

Projected

Projected

#### 11.5x 12.5x 13.5x 14.5x 15.5x

7.5% 729.8$ 778.6$ 827.3$ 876.1$ 924.8$

8.5% 699.8 746.3 792.9 839.4 885.9

9.5% 671.3 715.8 760.2 804.7 849.1

10.5% 644.3 686.8 729.2 771.7 814.2

11.5% 618.7 659.3 699.9 740.5 781.1

Enterprise Value

Discoun

t Rate

WACC

Exit Multiple# #### 11.0% 13.0% 15.0%

3.0% 509.2$ 509.2$ 509.2$

4.0% 634.7 634.7 634.7

5.0% 760.2 760.2 760.2

6.0% 885.7 885.7 885.7

7.0% 1,011.2 1,011.2 1,011.2

Enterprise Value

Revenue Growth (Exit)

EBITDA

Margin

#### 1.5% 2.5% 3.5%

7.5% 802.1$ 933.4$ 1,130.4$

8.5% 690.8 782.0 909.8

9.5% 607.4 673.9 762.7

10.5% 542.5 592.9 657.7

11.5% 490.6 529.9 578.9

Enterprise Value

Perpetuity Growth

Discoun

t Rate

WACC

Sensitivity Analysis

Assumptions & InputsRedHawk

Taxes 38%

Exit Multiple 13.5x

Perpetuity Growth 2.5%

Discount Rate (WACC) 9.5%

Valuation Date as of 12/31/2013

Net Debt $3.6

Page 21: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Analysis proves that RedHawk Security is exceedingly valuable

Valuation is based on 5-year projection estimates of income statement and cash flow items in order to derive a terminal value and implied valuation

Exit Multiple: EV/EBITDA multiple benchmarked off Precedent Analysis and Public COMPS

Precedent Analysis = 17.0x

Public Comparable Analysis = 13.7x

Conservatively accepted a lower multiple for Base Case scenario:

DCF = 13.5x

Conservative Exit Multiple Range:

11.5 – 15.5x

Perpetual Growth: Benchmarked off GDP and inflation (2.5% growth)

Discounted Cash Flow Summary

Summary of Analysis Growth Scenario: Accelerated Case

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000

11.5x 12.5x 13.5x 14.5x 15.5x

5%

8%

11%

14%

17%

En

terp

rise

Val

ue

(M)

Exit Multiple

WA

CC

##### 11.5x 12.5x 13.5x 14.5x 15.5x

7.5% 1,167.3$ 1,250.5$ 1,333.7$ 1,416.9$ 1,500.2$

8.5% 1,117.7 1,197.1 1,276.6 1,356.0 1,435.5

9.5% 1,070.6 1,146.5 1,222.4 1,298.3 1,374.2

10.5% 1,026.1 1,098.6 1,171.1 1,243.7 1,316.2

11.5% 983.8 1,053.2 1,122.5 1,191.8 1,261.2

Discount

Rate

WACC

Enterprise Value

Exit Multiple

$100

$600

$1,100

$1,600

11.5x 12.5x 13.5x 14.5x 15.5x

5%

8%

11%

14%

17%

20%

En

terp

rise

Val

ue

(M)

Exit Multiple

WA

CC

Reflects same exit multiple at 13.5x

2010 – 2015P projections based off managements financial guidance

2016P – 2018P Margins and growth slightly improve

Largest impact and value factor is the assumption of EBITDA margin improving

2016 2017 2018

Growth

Revenue 17.0% 17.5% 18.0%

Gross Profit 22.5% 24.4% 24.6%

Adj. EBITDA 31.4% 27.3% 27.1%

Margins

Gross Margin 17.0% 18.0% 19.0%

Adj. EBITDA 6.0% 6.5% 7.0%

15

Page 22: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

LBO Analysis Assumptions, calculations and return analysis

16

Total funded debt of 4.80x with estimated 2013 EBTIDA of $27.4 M

Assuming a 15.0x purchase and exit multiple due to company specific

initiatives, growth factors, and a higher implied value

Support: average exit multiple of strategic (22.5x) and financial (9.0x) precedents

Assuming a 9.0x purchase due to a more conservative approach and

valuation for a financial sponsor

Support: average exit multiple for financial precedents (9.0x)

Below is a sensitivity analysis reflecting the 15.0x LBO valuation

Analysis SummaryNormalized Assumptions

AssumptionsTransaction Close 12/31/2013

Senior Leverage at Closing 3.20x

Total Leverage at Closing 4.80x

Management Option Pool 0.0%

Purchase Price Assumptions2013E EBITDA $26.4 $26.4

Purchase Multiple 15.0x 9.0x

Enterprise Value $396.0 $237.6

Less: Net Debt ($3.6) ($3.6)

Implied Equity Value $392.4 $234.0

Assuming 9.0x Multiple

Sources $ % Leverage

Excess Cash $3.0 1.2%

Revolver # 0.0 0.0% 0.00x

Term Loan A (Senior Debt / EBITDA) 84.5 34.1% 3.20x

Term Loan B (Subordinated Debt / EBITDA) 42.2 17.1% 1.60x

Sponsor Equity 98.1 39.6%

Management 19.8 8.0%

Total (Total Debt / EBITDA) $247.6 100.0% 4.80x

2013 2018E

$ % $ % IRR

$98.4 # $557.8 ### 41.5%

Implied Sponsor Equity Contribution/Return

396.5$ 28.6% 31.6% 34.6% 396.5$ 28.6% 31.6% 34.6%

13.0x 391.0$ 361.8$ 336.2$ 4.3x 420.7$ 386.6$ 357.0$

15.0x 430.0 396.5 367.2 4.8x 430.0 396.5 367.2

17.0x 468.9 431.2 398.2 5.4x 439.3 406.2 377.5

Exit

Multiple

Total

Debt

IRR IRR

Assuming 15.0x Multiple

Sources $ % Leverage

Excess Cash $3.0 0.7%

Revolver # 0.0 0.0% 0.00x

Term Loan A (Senior Debt / EBITDA) 84.5 20.8% 3.20x

Term Loan B (Subordinated Debt / EBITDA) 42.2 10.4% 1.60x

Sponsor Equity 243.8 60.1%

Management 32.5 8.0%

Total (Total Debt / EBITDA) $406.0 100.0% 4.80x

2013 2018E

$ % $ % IRR

$244.1 # $961.6 ### 31.6%

Implied Sponsor Equity Contribution/Return

237.7$ 38.5% 41.5% 44.5% 237.7$ 38.5% 41.5% 44.5%

7.0x 223.9$ 213.3$ 203.9$ 4.3x 239.7$ 226.0$ 213.9$

9.0x 251.0 237.7 225.9 4.8x 251.0 237.7 225.9

11.0x 278.1 262.0 247.8 5.4x 262.4 249.3 237.9

Exit

Multiple

Total

Debt

IRR IRR

32.098% 3.3x 3.8x 4.3x 4.8x 5.3x 5.8x 6.3x

9.0x 47.9% 50.9% 54.3% 58.2% 62.8% 68.3% 75.2%

11.0x 39.1% 41.1% 43.3% 45.8% 48.5% 51.6% 55.1%

13.0x 32.7% 34.2% 35.8% 37.6% 39.5% 41.6% 43.8%

15.0x 27.7% 28.9% 30.2% 31.6% 33.0% 34.6% 36.2%

17.0x 23.7% 24.7% 25.7% 26.8% 28.0% 29.2% 30.5%

19.0x 20.4% 21.2% 22.1% 23.0% 23.9% 24.9% 26.0%

21.0x 17.5% 18.2% 19.0% 19.7% 20.5% 21.4% 22.3%

Purchase

/Exit

Multiple

Total Leverage Ratio

Page 23: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

$150.00 $350.00 $550.00 $750.00 $950.00

Precedent Transactions(Total - 17.0x)

Precedent Transactions(Strategic - 22.0x)

Precedent Transactions(Financial - 9.0x)

Public Comparables(Exit Multiple - 13.7x)

DCF Exit(Base Case - 13.5x)

LBO(Financial Precedents - 9.0x)

LBO(Normalized - 15.0x)

Valuation SummaryAll analyses determine an optimal outcome for growth

Average$383 - $477

Low Base High Low Base High

Precedent Transactions (Total) $395.60 $448.45 $501.20 15.0x 17.0x 19.0x

Precedent Transactions (Strategic) $528.00 $580.80 $633.60 20.0x 22.0x 24.0x

Precedent Transactions (Financial) $184.80 $237.60 $264.00 7.0x 9.0x 11.0x

Public Comparables $309.63 $362.43 $415.23 11.7x 13.7x 15.7x

DCF Exit (Base Case) $671.30 $760.20 $849.10 11.5x 13.5x 15.5x

LBO (Financial Precedents) $225.90 $237.70 $251.00 38.5% 41.5% 44.5%

LBO (Normalized) $367.20 $395.60 $430.00 28.6% 31.6% 33.6%

Average Statistics $383.20 $431.83 $477.73 13.0x 15.0x 17.0x

33.6% 36.6% 39.1%

Valuation Method

Exit / IRRImplied Value

17

Page 24: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Strategic & Financial Options

Page 25: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Potential Strategic Buyers List

Source:: Bloomberg, Google Finance, Yahoo Finance, Company Websites18

Company Name Description

Enterprise

Value

Market

Cap

LTM

Sales Cash

EV/

EBIT Notable Acquisitions Rationale

Intel / McAfee

Designs and manufactures integrated digital

technology platforms and network security

products

$118,945.25 $106,792.26 $52,351.00 $4,881.00 5.3x

McAfee is one of the largest security software

companies; additional acquisitions will

further Intel's competitive advantage

SymantecGlobal provider of security, storage, and systems

management solutions $16,049.01 $17,738.01 $6,947.00 $3,749.00 8.5x

Backupify provides data backup that protects

companies from data corruption and hacking

Cisco / Sourcefire

Provides large to midsize organzations and

government agencies with intelligent cyber

security solutions

$123,106.55 $88,715.55 $48,607.00 $7,925.00 6.5x

Ironport added message security to Cisco's

Self-Defending Network. Ironport

complemented Cisco's threat mitigation

Hewlett-Packard Co.Provider of products, technologies, software, and

solutions $45,124.42 $56,996.42 $113,126.00 $13,251.00 4.3x

Aquiring ArcSight allows HP to provide

compliance management solutions and to

mitigate cyber threat

Juniper

Develops, and sells products and services that

together provide its customers with network

infrastructure

$10,552.38 $8,758.88 $4,469.01 $2,249.90 13.3x

FireEye provides Juniper with network threat

prevention solutions and malware protection

systems

Blue Coat Systems

Provides Web security and WAN optimization

solutions, while offering solutions that provide

visibility, acceleration and security

NA NA $467.18 $361.39 NA

Permeo Technologies gives Blue coat systems

patented dynamic port management and

circuit switching security

Citrix Systems, Inc

Designs, develops and markets technology

solutions that enable information technology (IT)

services

$10,729.50 $10,029.35 $2,784.70 $263.15 16.4x

Gizmox enabled Citrix Systems to improve

their Mobile and Cloud delivery platforms.

Also it enables new HTML-enabled devices to

provide anytime access

RadwareManufactures and markets integrated networking

solutions$642.85 $482.77 $189.30 $16.54 NA

Strangeloop simply improves Radware's

hosting capabilities and mobile sit

optimazation.

IXIADevelops networking testing and compliance

products with security solutions$1,192.82 $1,158.72 $472.35 $55.69 12.3x

BreakingPoint Systems utilizes real-world

applications to mitigate live-security attacks

CACI international Inc

Provides information technology products and

services while delivering client solutions for

system integration, information and security

$1,616.69 $2,163.31 $3,681.99 $64.34 6.7x

Pangia Technologies improves CACI's data

storage aility as well as network security. Six3

gives CACI a larger connection directly to US

Government agencies

CenturyLink

Integrated communications company that provides

comunication services, data management, network

acess, and wireless services

$19,828.31 $40,199.31 $18,192.00 $214.00 4.1x

AppFog and Savvis gave CenturyLink

increased cloud-based hosting serviecs for

web applications

EMC Corp

Provides enterprise storage systems, software,

networks, and services to retrive, manage and

protect information

$52,187.82 $49,571.82 $22,309.51 $7,526.00 8.6x

RSA added indrustry-leading ideantity and

access management encryption to EMC's

expanding security portfolio

Websense

Global provider of unified Web, e-mail and data

security solutions designed to protect data and

users from external and internal threats

NA NA $359.44 $83.69 NA

SurfControl enabled Websense to imrpove

product offerings that better protect cyber

attacks, data theft, and other security issues

Page 26: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Potential Financial Buyers List

Source:: Bloomberg, Google Finance, Yahoo Finance, Company Websites19

PE Capital Overhang / Dry PowderStrategic vs. Financial Industry: Strategic vs. Financial

26% 26%19%

30%

74% 74%81%

70%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011$0

$400

$800

$1,200

22.5x 9.0x

Mil

lio

ns

2013E 2017E

Based on the Precedent Analysis and the DCF projections conducted, below are the strategic and financial average exit multiples and implied value based on RedHawk’s 2013E and 2017E EBITDA:

Strategic

Financial

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Bil

lio

ns

Sponsor Name Description

Criteria /

Investment Size AUM($MM)

Notable/Historical

Acquisitions Rationale

Thoma BravoThoma Bravo is a private equity firm specializing in investing in middle-

market companies in fragmented and consolidating industries$25-$200M $2.73B

Thoma Bravo is interested in investing in businesses who can grow

organically and by acquiring and integrating similar businesses

InvestCorp

Investcorp firm that manages alternative investment products while its

principal client base is in the six countries of the Gulf Co-operation

Council with institutional clients in North America and Europe

$50-$800M $10.5B

Focuses on small to middle market growth companies with a key interest

for technolgoy related companeis, specifically IT security, consulting and

management

Apax Partners LLPApax Partners LLP is a UK-based private equity and venture capital firm

which invests exclusively in a variety of business sectors$10-$650M >$58B

Apax Funds have a proven strategy of sector focused investing, looking for

opportunities where capital, experience and insight can release the potential

of businesses and lead to significant growth

TA Associates Inc

TA Associates is one of early modern-era private equity firms in the US,

that uses a hybrid strategy making growth capital investments in

developing companies through leveraged buyout and recapitalization

transactions

$50-$500M $11.1B

TA Partners with managers of growth companies to help build outstanding

business. They focus on profitable businesses with strong management

teams. Two industry focuses are technology and business services

Vista Equity Partners Vista Equity Partners is a private equity firm focused on investing in

software and technology-enabled businesses$20-$500M $6.45B

The firm has a strong portfolio of software and technology-enabled

business with a focus on long-term value creation. However, they lack a

security software business

GTCR LLC

GTCR LLC is a private equity firm focused on leveraged

buyout, leveraged recapitalization, growth

capitaland rollup transactions

N/A $7B

GTCR is known for its deep expertise in three growth sectors of the

economy: Financial Services & Technology, Healthcare, and Information

Services & Technology

Bloomberg and Pitch Book state there is a substantial amount of capital that firms need to invest

Page 27: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Summary & Recommendation

Page 28: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

We recommend that RedHawk and Sea Capital engage in a sell-side M&A process/transaction in order to seek an exit opportunity with a strategic or financial sponsor

The Precedent and Leveraged Buyout analyses best reflect the implied valuation based on this recommendation

The most attractive opportunity that would derive the highest implied valuation will be a strategic exit

The most appropriate and likely consideration however would be a Leveraged Buyout with a financial sponsor

Based on the Precedent and LBO Analysis, RedHawk and Sea Capital should seek an implied valuation range of:

Strategic Buyer

Implied Value: ~$528 - $633

Exit Multiple: ~20.0x – 24.0x

Support: Precedent Analysis – Strategic

Financial Sponsor

Implied Value: ~$296 – $340

IRR: ~34% - 39%

Exit Multiple: ~10.0x – 14.0x

Support:

50% weighted LBO Financial Precedents (9.0x): ~$225 - $251

50% weighted LBO Normalized (15.0x): ~$367 - $430

LBO Total Range = ~$225 - $430

Closing Comments

Overall Recommendation Most Likely Financial Sponsors

A strategic acquisition would most likely derive the highest value for management and the Company

Most Likely and Favorable Strategic Buyers

20

Specific benefits to a strategic exit include: potential synergies, gain in competitive advantage, geographic expansion, product line expansion,

cost reduction, and demand for additional subsidiary companies

- Continues to make acquisitions and promote/raise new investment funds

- Specific IT Security portfolio company continues to make heavy acquisitions (Blue Coat/Crossbeam)

- Reported 56% increase in net income for Fiscal Year 2013

- Successful historical acquisitions for tech firms- Portfolio is full of related IT security companies

- Recently sold security and defense firm (Six3) after rapid expansion; potentially looking for a new security portfolio company

CompanyAnnounced

Deals LTM

25

24

5

1

6

Cash and Near-Cash Equivelents

$2.9

$3.8

$10.6

$19.1

$50.6B

est

Fit

Page 29: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Appendix

Page 30: RedHawk Security - Blair Competition 2013

Full Financial Statement (Base Case)

Historical Estimated Projected

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Revenue 411.5$ 544.5$ 636.2$ 768.9$ 906.9$ 1,052.2$ 1,189.0$ 1,307.9$ 1,399.4$

COGS 337.5 457.3 522.8 642.7 756.7 881.4 998.7 1,105.2 1,189.5

Gross Profit 74.0 87.2 113.4 126.2 150.2 170.8 190.2 202.7 209.9

SG&A 56.3 70.8 80.3 100.3 105.9 114.6 128.4 136.7 140.3

D&A 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.1 6.9 6.8 7.0 6.5 7.0

One-Time Adjustments (0.5) (2.4) (1.5) (0.5) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Amortization 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

EBIT 11.9 11.9 27.2 19.3 37.4 49.4 54.8 59.5 62.6

D&A 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.1 6.9 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4

Amortization 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Adj. EBITDA 18.2$ 18.8$ 34.6$ 26.4$ 44.3$ 56.2$ 61.8$ 66.7$ 70.0$

CapEx (1.6)$ (5.3)$ (12.5)$ (6.9) (1.8) (2.6) (2.9) (3.2) (3.5)

Change in NWC N/A (0.3)$ (0.2)$ (0.7)$ (1.3)$ 0.3$ 0.5$ 0.6$ 0.7$

Growth

Revenue NA 32.3% 16.8% 20.9% 17.9% 16.0% 13.0% 10.0% 7.0%

Gross Profit NA 17.8% 30.0% 70.5% 19.0% 13.7% 11.4% 6.6% 3.5%

Adj. EBITDA NA 3.3% 84.0% 45.1% 67.8% 26.9% 10.0% 7.9% 4.9%

EBIT 0.0% 128.6% 62.2% 93.8% 32.1% 11.0% 8.5% 5.2%

Margins

Gross Margin 18.0% 16.0% 17.8% 16.4% 16.6% 16.2% 16.0% 15.5% 15.0%

Adj. EBITDA 4.4% 3.5% 5.4% 3.4% 4.9% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1% 5.0%

EBIT 2.9% 2.2% 4.3% 2.5% 4.1% 4.7% 4.6% 4.5% 4.5%

D&A (as a % of Revenue) 1.5% 1.3% 1.2% 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5%

CapEx (as a % of Revenue) -0.4% -1.0% -2.0% -0.9% -0.2% -0.2% -0.2% -0.2% -0.2%

Change in NWC (as a % pf Revenue) NA NA NA -0.2% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

SG&A (as a % of Revenue) 13.7% 13.0% 12.6% 13.0% 11.7% 10.9% 10.8% 10.5% 10.0%