redor-determined distances from heterospins to clusters of13c labels

4
REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospins to Clusters of 13 C Labels Jacob Schaefer Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Received October 5, 1998 The use of rotational-echo double resonance NMR to measure distances from an observed tightly coupled cluster of 13 C spins to a distant 15 N, 31 P, or 19 F is practical if all homonuclear 13 C– 13 C dipolar interactions are suppressed by multiple-pulse decoupling during heteronuclear dipolar evolution. This scheme is first cali- brated by experiments performed on multiply labeled alanines and then applied in the measurement of 19 F– 13 C distances in p-trifluoromethylphenyl [1,2- 13 C 2 ]acetate. © 1999 Academic Press It is well known that the information content of REDOR experiments could be improved if more than just the two spins of an isolated pair were involved. Clusters of 13 C labels cou- pled to some heterospin are of particular interest. Unfortu- nately, the use of rotational-echo double resonance (REDOR) to measure distances from an observed tightly coupled cluster of two or more 13 C labels (in a uniformly labeled residue of a protein, for example) to a distant 15 N, 31 P, or 19 F is compro- mised by homonuclear dephasing of the 13 C echo train. Long- range distance determinations by REDOR require that rota- tional echo trains persist for times of the order of 30 ms (1). Even though the 5- to 10-kHz magic-angle spinning speeds most commonly used in solid-state NMR experiments reduce the homonuclear dephasing effects of the 2-kHz dipolar cou- pling between directly bonded 13 C’s, spinning at these rates does not completely remove them. In addition, spinning has no effect on 13 C– 13 C scalar couplings, which are typically 50 –100 Hz for directly bonded carbons and 10 Hz for carbons sepa- rated by two bonds (2). The result is that 13 C echo trains for coupled carbons are attenuated and lose coherence after about 15 ms (Fig. 1, top). One way to improve the integrity of the echo train is to spin much faster, on the order of, say, 30 kHz. Fast spinning quenches homonuclear dipolar (but not scalar) coupling. This is a promising approach that is being pursued in several labo- ratories (3, 4), despite the fact that the volumes of current high-speed rotors limit the sample size to about 10 mg. A second approach is to create multiple-quantum coherence whose time evolution is independent of 13 C– 13 C coupling within the cluster (5). However, this method gives up infor- mation (all 13 C spins within the cluster experience the same average heteronuclear dipolar coupling) and suffers from re- duced sensitivity when the clusters have more than two car- bons. A third approach to maintain the integrity of a rotational echo train for a cluster of 13 C spins is to suppress residual dipolar 13 C– 13 C interactions by multiple-pulse decoupling (Fig. 1, bottom). In this communication, we show that it is possible to observe heteronuclear REDOR dephasing for a 13 C cluster while using multiple-pulse decoupling (MPD) to suppress homonuclear interactions. The pulse sequence for multiple-pulse decoupled REDOR (MPDR) had 5-ms 13 C p/2 pulses on the rotor periods (four pulses in six T r ) and a pair of X-spin p pulses within each rotor period. The X-spin p pulse lengths were 10 ms for 15 N and 5 ms for 19 F. The complete MPDR pulse sequence is illustrated in Fig. 2. Standard MREV-8 phase cycling (6) was used for MPD, and XY-8 phase cycling (7) for REDOR. Data acquisition began after multiples of 48 rotor periods so that each phase- cycling scheme was performed an even number of times before and after the central p pulse for optimum refocusing. Results of MPDR experiments on a directly bonded 13 C– 13 C pair in alanine and in p-trifluoromethylphenyl acetate are shown in Fig. 3. If the 13 C carrier frequency is chosen so that none of the isotropic peaks are on resonance (or off resonance by a multiple of the spinning frequency), REDOR-difference and full-echo spectra remain in phase after 48, 96, and 144 rotor cycles with spinning at 6.250 kHz. The cycle time of the MPD is 6T r , which corresponds to about 1-kHz decoupling. This is apparently sufficient to suppress dipolar couplings only partially averaged by spinning. The observed MPDR values of DS/ S 0 (96 T r ) for the carboxyl carbons of [1- 13 C, 15 N]alanine, [1,2- 13 C 2 , 15 N]alanine, and [1,2,3- 13 C 3 , 15 N]alanine are 0.59, 0.48, and 0.35, respec- tively. The 48% dephasing in the 96-T r 13 C 2 -alanine spectra of Fig. 3 represents about 70% of that calculated in three-spin simulations (8) (assuming d-function pulses) explicitly includ- ing MPD. This limit is not related to the expected scaling (6) of the 13 C–X dipolar coupling which is taken into account in the simulation, and is not exceeded by increasing the dephasing time. Standard isolated two-spin REDOR experiments yield close to 100% of the calculated dephasing ( DS/ S 0 1 for 96 Journal of Magnetic Resonance 137, 272–275 (1999) Article ID jmre.1998.1643, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on 272 1090-7807/99 $30.00 Copyright © 1999 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Upload: jacob-schaefer

Post on 15-Jun-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospins to Clusters of13C Labels

daddbap

eopntopmrtEmtpdeHrc1

mqirhsww

Journal of Magnetic Resonance137,272–275 (1999)Article ID jmre.1998.1643, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on

1CA

REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospinsto Clusters of 13C Labels

Jacob Schaefer

Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130

Received October 5, 1998

13

Rpin-rtuO

rf a--rot(

eedduccoess n00eprab

pinninThlaben.

ren

r-

m mea re-d car-b nale uald ig.1 ibletw essh

OR( urp rpm d inF ,a nb ase-c eforea

p res hatn anceb ncea 144r theM ing.T onlyp

ca ec-t fF -spins -i (o int asingt ieldc

The use of rotational-echo double resonance NMR to measureistances from an observed tightly coupled cluster of 13C spins todistant 15N, 31P, or 19F is practical if all homonuclear 13C–13C

ipolar interactions are suppressed by multiple-pulse decouplinguring heteronuclear dipolar evolution. This scheme is first cali-rated by experiments performed on multiply labeled alaninesnd then applied in the measurement of 19F–13C distances in-trifluoromethylphenyl [1,2-13C2]acetate. © 1999 Academic Press

It is well known that the information content of REDOxperiments could be improved if more than just the two sf an isolated pair were involved. Clusters of13C labels couled to some heterospin are of particular interest. Unfoately, the use of rotational-echo double resonance (RED

o measure distances from anobservedtightly coupled clustef two or more13C labels (in a uniformly labeled residue orotein, for example) to a distant15N, 31P, or 19F is comproised by homonuclear dephasing of the13C echo train. Long

ange distance determinations by REDOR require thational echo trains persist for times of the order of 30 ms1).ven though the 5- to 10-kHz magic-angle spinning spost commonly used in solid-state NMR experiments re

he homonuclear dephasing effects of the 2-kHz dipolarling between directly bonded13C’s, spinning at these ratoes not completely remove them. In addition, spinning haffect on13C–13C scalar couplings, which are typically 50–1z for directly bonded carbons and 10 Hz for carbons s

ated by two bonds (2). The result is that13C echo trains fooupled carbons are attenuated and lose coherence after5 ms (Fig. 1, top).One way to improve the integrity of the echo train is to such faster, on the order of, say, 30 kHz. Fast spinuenches homonuclear dipolar (but not scalar) coupling.

s a promising approach that is being pursued in severalatories (3, 4), despite the fact that the volumes of currigh-speed rotors limit the sample size to about 10 mgecond approach is to create multiple-quantum cohehose time evolution is independent of13C–13C couplingithin the cluster (5). However, this method gives up info

272090-7807/99 $30.00opyright © 1999 by Academic Pressll rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

s

-R)

a-

se

u-

o

a-

out

giso-tAce

ation (all C spins within the cluster experience the saverage heteronuclear dipolar coupling) and suffers fromuced sensitivity when the clusters have more than twoons. A third approach to maintain the integrity of a rotatiocho train for a cluster of13C spins is to suppress residipolar 13C–13C interactions by multiple-pulse decoupling (F, bottom). In this communication, we show that it is poss

o observe heteronuclear REDOR dephasing for a13C clusterhile using multiple-pulse decoupling (MPD) to suppromonuclear interactions.The pulse sequence for multiple-pulse decoupled RED

MPDR) had 5-ms 13C p/2 pulses on the rotor periods (foulses in sixTr) and a pair of X-spinp pulses within each rotoeriod. The X-spinp pulse lengths were 10ms for 15N and 5s for 19F. The complete MPDR pulse sequence is illustrateig. 2. Standard MREV-8 phase cycling (6) was used for MPDnd XY-8 phase cycling (7) for REDOR. Data acquisitioegan after multiples of 48 rotor periods so that each phycling scheme was performed an even number of times bnd after the centralp pulse for optimum refocusing.Results of MPDR experiments on a directly bonded13C–13C

air in alanine and inp-trifluoromethylphenyl acetate ahown in Fig. 3. If the13C carrier frequency is chosen so tone of the isotropic peaks are on resonance (or off resony a multiple of the spinning frequency), REDOR-differend full-echo spectra remain in phase after 48, 96, andotor cycles with spinning at 6.250 kHz. The cycle time ofPD is 6Tr, which corresponds to about 1-kHz decouplhis is apparently sufficient to suppress dipolar couplingsartially averaged by spinning.The observed MPDR values ofDS/S0 (96 Tr) for the

arboxyl carbons of [1-13C, 15N]alanine, [1,2-13C2,15N]alanine,

nd [1,2,3-13C3,15N]alanine are 0.59, 0.48, and 0.35, resp

ively. The 48% dephasing in the 96-Tr13C2-alanine spectra o

ig. 3 represents about 70% of that calculated in threeimulations (8) (assumingd-function pulses) explicitly includng MPD. This limit is not related to the expected scaling6)f the 13C–X dipolar coupling which is taken into account

he simulation, and is not exceeded by increasing the dephime. Standard isolated two-spin REDOR experiments ylose to 100% of the calculated dephasing (DS/S0 ' 1 for 96

Page 2: REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospins to Clusters of13C Labels

T incp ngf olae terf gia ttet thee tioo sel e-ca td tran vet ngla

13 eo ypeso e. Ing showl larlyf esevt al tott roce-d has-i tlyb the1

dl wett isg hec r thec ictedD theda

Fg las clesa re ina seudot oxylc rines.Tr ygena att rei

l-l (leam h thX

np esi ).M

273COMMUNICATIONS

r). We attribute the shortfall in MPDR to (i) the difficultyompensating for the imperfections inp/2 pulses; (ii) theossibility that some13C spins may not be in the MPD toggli

rame, but rather along the static magnetic field during dipvolution, but not during detection; and (iii) destructive in

erence in coherent averaging by the combination of mangle spinning and imperfect MPD. With respect to the la

he difference in cycle times for MPD and spinning inxperiments of Fig. 3 is only a factor of 6, and the combinaf averaging techniques, although greatly extending the u

ifetime of the 13C rotational echo train, is limited. The drease in intensity of the full-echo spectrum of13C3-labeledlanine for 144Tr compared to 96Tr (Fig. 1, bottom) is abououble that observed in the standard Hahn-echo specatural-abundance13C alanine. Spinning faster should impro

his situation by reducing the cycle times of both magic-and MPD averaging.

FIG. 1. 125-MHz 13C NMR spectra ofL-[ 13C3,15N]alanine (5%, recrysta

ized with 95% natural-abundance alanine) obtained after 96 rotor cyclesnd 144 rotor cycles (right) of evolution with (bottom) and without (top)13Cultiple-pulse decoupling using the pulse sequence of Fig. 2 but wit-spin dephasing pulses omitted.

FIG. 2. Pulse sequence for multiple-pulse decoupled REDOR. Phaspulses, (x, y, x, y, y, x, y, x). The former is repeated 2n times (n 5 1, 2

sotropic chemical shifts), while the latter is repeated 6n times before andaximum REDOR dephasing occurs if the spacing between X-spin pu

r-c-r,

nful

of

e

Even in the presence of the sameC–X dipolar coupling, thbserved MPDR dephasing is not the same for different tf carbons, although the calculated dephasing is the sameneral, carbons with sizeable chemical shift anisotropies

ess dephasing than those with small shift tensors, particuor weak coupling after only 48 rotor cycles. Because thariations appear to be related to the response of the13C spinso imperfect MPD, REDOR dephasing remains proportionhe heteronuclear dipolar coupling for afixeddipolar evolutionime. We have therefore adopted an empirical scaling pure to determine internuclear distances from MPDR dep

ng, which we illustrate for the carboxyl carbons of direconded13C–13C pairs. The calculated MPDR dephasing for85-Hz (9), two-bond13C–15N dipolar coupling inL-[1,2-13C2,

15N]alanine after 96Tr is DS/S0 5 0.74, and theobservedephasing for the carboxyl carbon isDS/S0 5 0.48 (Fig. 3,

eft; Fig. 4, open circle). The ratio of the two is 0.65, whichake as the scaling factor for all calculated values ofDS/S0 forhis carbon in the 96-Tr experiment. A scaling factor of 0.67enerated for the 48-Tr experiment by comparison of torresponding calculated and experimental dephasing foarboxyl carbon. The resulting scaled versions of the predS/S0 (Fig. 4, solid lines) can now be used to determineipolar coupling between a carboxyl carbon in a13C–13C pairnd any X spin in an analytical sample.As a test of this method, the13C–19F coupling between the C3

roup and the carboxyl carbon in thep-trifluoromethylphenycetate of Fig. 3 (right) is measured in Fig. 4 (experimentalDS/S0

hown by solid symbols) as 75 Hz (7.1 Å) after 48 rotor cynd 70 Hz (7.3 Å) after 96 rotor cycles. These values agreement with the calculated, conformation-independent, p

wo-bond distance of 7.2 Å. This is the distance from the carbarbon to the center of the triangle defined by the three fluohis distance is long enough that the orientation of the CF3 coneelative to the internuclear vector connecting the acetate oxnd carboxyl carbon is not important (10), but short enough th

he dephasing behavior of the CF3 and that of a single fluorine andistinguishable. The13C–19F coupling between the CF3 group

ft)

e

ycling of the13C p/2 pulses is (x, 2y, y, 2x, 2x, 2y, y, x) and that of the X-spi, . . . ) in 24nTr before and after the central13C p pulse (this pulse refocuser the central Xp pulse (this pulse prevents refocusing of13C–X dipolar dephasingis2.

e c, 3aft

lsesTr/

Page 3: REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospins to Clusters of13C Labels

a linf l-ca tanfÅ

ent sta

d ionc sed.AN sed.F thath ore got and3 mustb ru ig.4 delc eu ro-n ex-p etheru onot -w ala lingsl

sionl ter

nine)a evolutionw topo s.T

c heh hes g (t ltst ,o ing6

274 COMMUNICATIONS

nd the methyl carbon is determined similarly, with a scaactor of 1.00 (48Tr) and 0.78 (96Tr) established by the methyarbon results (not shown) for both double- and triple-13C labeledlanines. The conformation-dependent experimental dis

rom the methyl carbon to the CF3 group is 8.1 Å (48Tr) or 7.7(96 Tr).We anticipate a broad applicability for MPDR. Ev

hough the dephasing is generally reduced relative to

FIG. 3. 125-MHz multiple-pulse decoupled REDOR13C NMR spectra ofL-ndp-trifluoromethylphenyl [1,2-13C2]acetate (right, 3% by weight, homogeneith magic-angle spinning at 6.250 kHz. The spacing between the15N (left) andf the figure and the full-echo spectra at the bottom. Solid circles indicate she sizeable dephasing of the natural-abundance13C methine-carbon peak sug

FIG. 4. Multiple-pulse decoupled REDOR dephasing (DS/S0) for thearboxyl carbon of a13C–13C directly bonded pair as a function of teteronuclear dipolar coupling to a spin-1

2 X nucleus. The solid lines show tcaled calculated dephasing in the presence of multiple-pulse decouplinext). The open and closed symbols are, respectively, experimental resuhe carboxyl carbons of the alanine and acetate13C–13C pairs of Fig. 3btained using the pulse sequence of Fig. 2 with magic-angle spinn.250 kHz.

g

ce

n-

ard REDOR for isolated pairs of spins, the informatontent of any single experiment is dramatically increas long as chemical-shift resolution is available in the13CMR spectrum, multiple independent clusters can be uor example, one could imagine a protein binding sitead both13C6-histidine and13C4-threonine so that sevenight distances could be measured to a ligand containin19Fr 31P. Preliminary results onL-[ 13C6,

15N3]histidine indicatehat MPDR works as well for 6-carbon clusters as for 2--carbon clusters. However, a dephasing scaling factore generatedfor each carbon typeby experiment and eithesed in conjunction with multispin simulations (as in F), or with calibration experiments on one or more moompounds containing theidentical 13C spin cluster to bsed in the analytical application but with known heteuclear dipolar couplings. In calibration and analyticaleriments, strong and weak couplings are measured togsing fixed dipolar evolution times by systematic variatif the separation of the REDOR dephasing pulses (11). In

he event that the natural-abundance13C background overhelms the signals of the13C clusters in the analyticpplication, one of a variety of homonuclear recoupchemes (12–16) can be used to isolate the signals from13C

abels and generate the spin count needed forS0.

EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

MPDR was performed using a 6-frequency transmisine probe having a 12-mm long, 6-mm inside-diame

-13C2,15N]alanine (left, 10%, recrystallized with 90% natural-abundance ala

ly dispersed in glassy polystyrene) obtained after 96 rotor cycles of dipolar(right) dephasing pulses wasTr/2. The REDOR-difference spectra are at thening sidebands; dashed lines connect peaks associated with the labeled acetate carbonts a preferred location for the CF3 group in the polystyrene glass.

seefor

at

[1,2ous19Fpinges

Page 4: REDOR-Determined Distances from Heterospins to Clusters of13C Labels

a atoP d it zirc peeu ascr ei ely

-kWC atA -Ts agn olai tod ionS -n atioo

ulat Wem at gtoU eta thot iftt

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

275COMMUNICATIONS

nalytical coil and a Chemagnetics/Varian ceramic stowdered samples (typically 100 mg) were containe

hin-wall Chemagnetics/Varian 5-mm outside diameteronia rotors. The rotors were spun at 6250 Hz with the snder active control to within62 Hz. The spectrometer wontrolled by a Tecmag pulse programmer.13C and 15Nadiofrequency pulses were produced by 1- and 2-kW Amcan Microwave Technology power amplifiers, respectiv

1H and 19F radiofrequency pulses were generated by 1reative Electronics tube amplifiers driven by 100-wmerican Microwave Technology power amplifiers. A 12tatic magnetic field was provided by an 89-mm bore Mex superconducting solenoid. Proton-carbon cross-p

zation transfers were made in 2 ms at 50 kHz. Proipolar decoupling was 100 kHz during data acquisitpectra of alanine standards and thep-trifluoromethylpheyl acetate analytical sample resulted from the accumulf 64 and 3072 scans, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by NIH grant GM-40634. The three-spin simions were performed using code generously provided by Shimon Vega (ann Institute) and described in Ref. (8). Experiments were performed with

ransmission-line probe designed and built by R.A. McKay (Washinniversity) supported by NIH grant RR09974, together with a spectromlso built by R.A. McKay supported by NSF grant BIR9400072. The au

hanks Yves Aubin and Cameron Black (Merck Frosst Canada) for the ghe labeled acetate.

r.n-d

r-.

t

-r-n.

n

-iz-

nerr

of

REFERENCES

1. L. M. McDowell, A. Schmidt, E. R. Cohen, D. R. Studelska, and J.Schaefer, J. Mol. Biol. 256, 160–171 (1996).

2. J. B. Stothers, “Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy,” Academic Press,New York (1972), p. 327; pp. 370–373.

3. A. K. Mehta, B. A. Tounge, S. T. Burns, X. Wu, and K. W. Zilm, 39thRocky Mountain Conference on Analytical Chemistry, Denver (1997).

4. M. Ernst, A. Verhoeven, and B. H. Meier, J. Magn. Reson. 130,176–185 (1998).

5. X. Feng, M. Eden, A. Brinkmann, H. Luthman, L. Eriksson, A.Graslund, O. N. Antzukin, and M. H. Levitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119,12006–12007 (1997).

6. P. Mansfield, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 299, 479–496 (1981).

7. T. G. Gullion, D. B. Baker, and M. S. Conradi, M. S., J. Magn.Reson. 89, 479–484 (1990).

8. S. M. Holl, G. R. Marshall, D. D. Beusen, K. Kociolek, A. S. Red-linski, M. T. Leplawy, R. A. McKay, S. Vega, and J. Schaefer, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 114, 4830–4833 (1992).

9. T. Gullion and J. Schaefer, Adv. Magn. Reson. 13, 57–83 (1989).

0. J. M. Goetz and J. Schaefer, J. Magn. Reson. 127, 147–154 (1997).

1. A. W. Hing and J. Schaefer, Biochemistry 32, 7593–7604 (1993).

2. D. P. Raleigh, M. H. Levitt, and R. G. Griffin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 146,71–76 (1988).

3. V. Bork and J. Schaefer, J. Magn. Reson. 78, 348–354 (1988).

4. R. Tycko and G. Dabbagh, Chem. Phys. Lett. 173, 461–465 (1990).

5. T. Gullion and S. Vega, Chem. Phys. Lett. 194, 423–428 (1992).

6. W. Zhu, C. A. Klug, and J. Schaefer, J. Magn. Reson. 108, 121–123(1994).