reducing embodied carbon - cote 3/8/2011

37
Larry Strain Siegel & Strain Architects www.siegelstrain.com Time Value of CO 2 e savings The importance of embodied CO 2 e CO 2 e Time

Upload: aiasf11

Post on 05-Dec-2014

1.624 views

Category:

Design


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Reducing Embodied Carbon in the built environment will play an increasingly important role in reducing overall carbon emissions over the next 20 years. For buildings, the focus has mostly been on reducing emissions by reducing the use of fossil fuels for operating energy. But we also need to reduce the carbon emissions embodied in the materials and resulting from the construction phase. As buildings become more efficient to operate, the embodied energy and emissions from materials and construction becomes an increasingly significant portion of total GHG emissions.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Larry  Strain      Siegel  &  Strain  Architects  www.siegelstrain.com  

Time Value of CO2e savings

The importance of embodied CO2e

CO2e

Time

Page 2: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

DEFINITIONS

 Carbon  Dioxide  (CO2)  –  a  colorless,  odorless  gas  1.98kg/m3  

           Density:  1.98kg/m3  (at  s.t.p.)  

           I  Ton  =  505  cubic  meters  

           1lb  =  2  ½  cubic  feet  

Each  year,  the  US  produces  enough  CO2    to  cover  the  enTre  land  mass  of  the  US  18”  deep  

Page 3: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Carbon  Dioxide  (CO2)          GWP  =  1  

Other  greenhouse  gasses:      Water  Vapor  

   Methane        GWP  =  21      Ozone  

   Nitrous  Oxide        GWP  =  310  

   Fluorinated  Gasses      GWP  =  140  to  11,700            HFC-­‐23      GWP      =  11,700            HFC-­‐32      GWP      =            650            HFC-­‐125          GWP      =      2,800            HFC-­‐134a      GWP      =      1,300            HFC-­‐143a          GWP      =      3,800            HFC-­‐152a                GWP      =            140            HFC-­‐227ea    GWP      =      2,900            HFC-­‐236fa        GWP      =      6,300            HFC-­‐4310mee    GWP      =      1,300  

     

DEFINITIONS

Page 4: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - BUILDING OPERATIONS

Page 5: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Page 6: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Construction Sources of CO2e

ConstrucTon  Materials  

ExtracTon,  Harvest  Manufacture  –  primary,  secondary  

Transport  

ConstrucTon  AcTvity  

Equipment  –  grading,  hauling,  cranes,  etc.  Labor  -­‐  transportaTon  

Energy  Use  –  tools,  temp  faciliTes    

Page 7: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Source:  NAHB  esTmates  based  on  Athena  Impact  EsTmator,  the  Department  of  Housing  and  Urban  Development’s  UTlity  Model  and  regressions  developed  from  the  Department  of  TransportaTon’s  NaTonal  Household  Travel  Survey  Data.    

Reducing Embodied CO2e in Buildings (lower emission materials - fewer materials)

Typical  Home  -­‐  51.4  MT    (Full  Basement)  

Fiberglass  Insula?on  Vinyl  frame  windows  Vinyl  Siding  Comp  shingle  roofing  2x4  framing  OSB  Sheathing  15%  fly-­‐ash  concrete  

“Greener”  Home  –  43.9  MT    (Full  Basement)  

-­‐3.64    Cellulose  Insula?on  -­‐1.94      Wood  frame  windows  -­‐1.77      Wood  Siding  +2.89    Steel  roofing  –  more  durable  +0.32    2x6  framing  –  more  insula?on  -­‐1.36      Plywood  -­‐1.98      35%  fly-­‐ash  concrete  

7.5  ton  reduc?on  

 “Greener”  Home    -­‐  30  MT  -­‐19.9    (No  Basement)  

-­‐3.64    Cellulose  Insula?on  -­‐1.94      Wood  frame  windows  -­‐1.77      Wood  Siding  +2.89    Steel  roofing  –  more  durable  +0.32    2x6  framing  –  more  insula?on  -­‐1.36      Plywood  -­‐1.98      35%  fly-­‐ash  concrete  

27.4  ton  reduc?on  

51.4  43.9  

24  

Page 8: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

LOW  CARBON  ALTERNATIVE   CO2  Unit   STANDARD  MATERIALS   MulTplier  

Aggregate  rubble  trench   1   Concrete  foundaTon   20x  

Earthen  floor  (from  site)   1   Raised  wood  floor   20x  

No  carpet   0   SyntheTc  carpet   N/A  

Wood   1   Engineered  wood  products   2  -­‐  10x  

Wood  window  frames   1   Aluminum  window  frames   20x  

Cellulose  insulaTon   1   Fiberglass  insulaTon   5  –  10x  

Strawbale  walls  (load  bearing)   1   Wood  frame  walls   2  -­‐  10  

Clay  paint  (from  site)   1   Paint   30x  

Adobe    (earth  from  site)   1   Fired  brick   20x  

Reducing Embodied CO2e in Buildings (Very low emission materials)

Page 9: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

PORTOLA  VALLEY  TOWN  CENTER    (PVTC) Goring  &  Straja  Architects  

Design  Team  Mechanical  –  Rumsey  Engineers        Electrical  –  IDeAs        Photovoltaics  –  High  Sun  Engineers        Structural  –  Forrell/Elsesser        Landscape  –  Lutsko  Associates        Civil  -­‐    BKF  

Page 10: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Old  Town  Center                Area                %  of  Total                                        New  Town  Center              Area                %  of  Total  Building  Footprint            25,000                    5.1%                                          Building  Footprint          20,500      4.2%  Paving                                                165,900                33.9%                                          Paving                                                146,400                29.9%  Playing  Fields                            96,000                19.6%                                              Playing  Fields                      100,000                  20.4%  Landscape                                  203,000                41.4%                                            Landscape                                223,000                  45.5%  

Goring & Straja Architects

BEFORE                    AFTER

PORTOLA  VALLEY  TOWN  CENTER    (PVTC)

Page 11: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Goring & Straja Architects PORTOLA  VALLEY  TOWN  CENTER    (PVTC)

Page 12: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

PVTC  -­‐  Building  Materials  –  Weight  –  1664  tons  

Concrete    -­‐    1324   Reinf.  Steel    -­‐    51  

Wood    -­‐    119   Engineered  Wood    -­‐    25  

Struct.  Steel    -­‐    10   Metal  roofing    -­‐    13  

Waterproofing    -­‐    3   InsulaTon  -­‐  Bak  -­‐  0  

InsulaTon  -­‐  XPS  -­‐  1   Fiber  Cement  Shakes    -­‐    1  

Steel  Doors    -­‐    1   Glass  -­‐  dbl  pane  -­‐  8  

Alum/glass  doors    -­‐    .6   Alum.  Clad  wndws    -­‐    .4  

Gyp.  bd.    -­‐    63   Clg.  Tile    -­‐    6  

Ceramic  Tile    -­‐    4   Carpet  Tile    -­‐    3  

Ceiling  Tile  -­‐  6   Linoleum    -­‐    .4  

DucTng    -­‐    6   Cast  Iron  pipe    -­‐    6  

Copper  Pipe    -­‐    2   Steel  pipe    -­‐    .4  

Wiring    -­‐    .4   Pex  Tubing  

Page 13: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Concrete  -­‐  172   Reinf.  Steel  -­‐  21  

Wood  Framing  -­‐  36   Eng.  Wood  -­‐  16  

Struct.  Steel  -­‐  7   Metal  Roofing  -­‐  31  

Waterproofing  -­‐  14   InsulaTon  -­‐  Bak    -­‐  13  

InsulaTon  -­‐  XPS  -­‐  28   Cem/fiber  Shakes  -­‐  2  

Steel  Doors  -­‐  3   Glass  -­‐  dbl  pane  -­‐  7  

Alum/glass  doors  -­‐  4   Alum.  clad  wndws  -­‐  3  

Gypsum  board  -­‐  22   Wood  -­‐  Finish  -­‐  17  

Carpet  Tile  -­‐  6   Ceramic  Tile  -­‐  6  

Ceiling  Tile  -­‐  1   Linoleum  -­‐  1  

DucTng  -­‐11   Cast  Iron  pipe  -­‐  11  

Copper  Pipe  -­‐  5   Steel  pipe  -­‐  1  

Wiring  -­‐  8   PEX  Tubing  -­‐  2  

PVTC  -­‐  Building  Materials  –  GHG  emissions  –  449  tons  

Page 14: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

GHG  Emissions  –  ConstrucTon  Materials  -­‐  Buildings                Base  Case  –  449  Tons                As  Built–  305  Tons  -­‐  ReducTon  -­‐  144  Tons  (32%)    

     Structure                                  Envelope                                    Finishes                                    MEP                  252                              106                                                                  53                  37                            166                              97                                                10                          32  

GHG  Emission

s  (Ton

s)  

-­‐30  -­‐20  -­‐10  0  10  20  30  40  50  60  70  80  90  100  110  120  130  140  150  160  170  180  190  

Concrete  

Reinf.  steel  

Woo

d  Fram

ing  

Engine

ered

 Woo

d  Struct.  Steel  

Metal  ro

ofing  

Waterproo

fing  

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  B

ak    

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  X

PS  

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  C

okon

 Ce

m/fibe

r  Shakes  

Steel  D

oors  

Glass  -­‐  db

l  pane  

Alum/glass  doo

rs  

Alum.  clad  wnd

ws  

Gyp.  bd.  

Woo

d  -­‐  Finish    

Salvaged

 Woo

d  Ce

ramic  Tile  

Carpet  Tile  

Ceiling  Tile  

Lino

leum

 

DucTn

g  Cast  Iron

 pipe  

Wiring  

Copp

er  Pipe  

Steel  pipe  

PEX  Tubing  

Page 15: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

GHG  Emissions  -­‐  ConstrucTon  Materials  –  Buildings  +  Site                Base  Case  –  772  Tons                As  Built  –  564  tons  -­‐  ReducTon  -­‐  208  tons  (27%)    

   Site                        Structure      Envelope      Finishes                          MEP                323                    252                                106                                53                  37                259                    156                                97                                10                  32  

GHG  Emission

s  (Ton

s)  

-­‐30  -­‐20  -­‐10  0  10  20  30  40  50  60  70  80  90  100  110  120  130  140  150  160  170  180  190  

AC  paving  

Site  Con

crete  

Reinf.  steel  

Trail  paving  

Woo

d  Co

nduit  

UTliTes  -­‐  piping  

Sewer  exten

sion

 Wire

 

Concrete  

Reinf.  steel  

Woo

d  Fram

ing  

Engine

ered

 Woo

d  Struct.  Steel  

Metal  ro

ofing  

Waterproo

fing  

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  B

ak    

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  X

PS  

InsulaTo

n  -­‐  C

okon

 Ce

m/fibe

r  Shakes  

Steel  D

oors  

Glass  -­‐  db

l  pane  

Alum/glass  doo

rs  

Alum.  clad  wnd

ws  

Gyp.  bd.  

Woo

d  -­‐  Finish    

Salvaged

 Woo

d  Ce

ramic  Tile  

Carpet  Tile  

Ceiling  Tile  

Lino

leum

 

DucTn

g  Cast  Iron

 pipe  

Wiring  

Copp

er  Pipe  

Steel  pipe  

PEX  Tubing  

Page 16: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

GHG  Emissions  –  Construc?on  Vehicle  Emissions                    Base  Case  –  306  tons                As  Built  –  290  -­‐  ReducTon  -­‐  16  tons  (9%)  

Site                Buildings            156                        150            145                        145  

GHG  Emission

s  (Ton

s)  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

140  

160  

Earthw

ork,  paving  

Conc.  D

emo  -­‐  o

maul  

Baserock  -­‐  im

port  

CMU  Dem

o  -­‐  o

maul  

Worker  commute  

Windo

ws  -­‐  M

anito

ba    

Gyp.  bd.    

Carpet    

Ceiling  Tile  s  

Woo

d  –  FSC    

Ceramic  Tile  

Woo

d  –  Site  salvaged  

Recycling  Hauling  

Concrete  cast  in  place  

Cellulose  InsulaTo

n    

Woo

d  –  En

gine

ered

   

Metal  Roo

fing  

Struct.  Steel  –  truck  

Struct.  Steel  –  train  

Waste  Hauling  

Reinf.  steel  -­‐  truck  

Reinf.  steel  -­‐  trail  

Page 17: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

GHG  Emissions  -­‐  Totals  Base  Case  –  1,078  tons          As  Built  –  854  tons  ReducTon  -­‐  224  tons  (21%)        

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1000  

1200  

Base  Case   As-­‐Built  

Vehicles

Materials

306

290

772 564

Goring & Straja Architects

Page 18: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Material    Baseline  –  Standard       As-­‐Built  –  Reduced  carbon   Savings  

Quant.  tons    

ton  CO2  /  ton  

Total    CO2  /  ton  

Quant.  tons    

ton  CO2  /  ton  

Total    CO2  /  ton  

Tons  of  CO2    

Source  

Structure  

Concrete   1324   0.13   172.4   1324   0.07   86   -­‐86   ICE  

Reinforcing  steel   51   0.4   21.42   51   0.4   21.4   0   ICE  

Wood   80   0.45   36   80   0.45   36   0   ICE  

Engineered  Wood   24.6   0.65   16   24.6   0.65   16   0     ICE  

Structural  Steel   10   0.68   6.8   10   0.68   6.8   0   ICE  

Structure  Total   252   166   -­‐86  

Weight  CO2/ton    material  

Total  emissions  

Source  of    CO2  emissions  

 data  

Weight  CO2/ton    material  

Total  emissions  

Portola  Valley  Town  Center  –  CalculaTng  CO2e  

Page 19: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Portola  Valley  Town  Center  

Material    Baseline   Reduced  Carbon  

t  saved    Quant.  t     t  CO2  /  t   Total    CO2  /  t   Quant.  t   t  CO2  /  t   Total    CO2  /  t  Structure  

Concrete   1324   0.13   172.1   1324   0.07   86.1   -­‐86  Reinf.  steel   51   0.42   21.4   51   0.42   21.4   0  Wood  Framing   80   0.45   36.0   80   0.45   36.0   0  Engineered  Wood   24.6   0.65   16.0   24.6   0.65   16.0   0  Struct.  Steel   9.8   0.68   6.7   9.8   0.68   6.7   0  

Structure  Total   252.2   166.1   -­‐86  

Envelope

 

Metal  roofing   12.5   2.50   31.25   12.5   2.50   31.3   0  Ice  and  water  shield   3.3   4.20   13.86   3.3   4.20   13.9   0  InsulaTon  –  Bak     7.5   1.50   11.25   47   0.04   1.9   -­‐9  InsulaTon  -­‐  XPS   6500  bf   8.67   28.20   6500  bf   8.67   28.2   0  InsulaTon  -­‐  Cokon   1.0   1.50   1.50   3   0.04   0.1   -­‐1  Metals  -­‐  Sunscreen   1.5   0.68   1.02   1.5   0.68   1.02  Fiber  Cement  Shakes   1.1   2.11   2.32   2.2   1.80   4.0   2  Steel  Doors   1.2   2.50   3.00   1.2   2.50   3.0   0  Glass  -­‐  double  pane   8.32   0.85   7.07   8.32   0.85   7.1   0  Alum.  sTle/rail  doors   0.59   8.20   4.84   0.59   8.20   4.8   0  alum.  Clad  frames   0.38   8.20   3.12   0.38   8.20   3.1   0  

Envelope  Total   107.4   98.3   -­‐9  

Finishes  

Gyp.  bd.   63   0.35   22.1   63   0.35   22.0   0  Wood  -­‐  Finish     39   0.45   17.6   0.0   0.45   0.0   -­‐18  Salvaged  Wood   0   0.00   0.0   39   -­‐0.67   -­‐26.1   -­‐26  Ceiling  Tile   6.4   0.20   1.3   6.4   0.20   1.3   0  Ceramic  Tile   4.4   1.40   6.2   4.4   1.40   6.2   0  Carpet  Tile   2.5   2.30   5.8   2.5   2.30   5.8   0  Linoleum   0.4   1.20   0.4   0.35   1.20   0.4   0  

Finishes  Total   53.2   9.5   -­‐44  

MEP

 

DucTng   6.0   1.75   10.5   3   1.75   5.3   -­‐5  Cast  Iron  pipe   5.7   1.90   10.8   5.7   1.90   10.8   0  Copper  Pipe   1.6   3.00   4.8   1.6   3.00   4.8   0  Steel  pipe   0.4   2.70   1.0   0.38   2.70   1.0   0  PEX  Tubing   0.5   4.00   1.8   0.5   4.00   1.8   0  Wiring   0.3   3.00   7.8   0.346   3.00   7.8   0  

MEP  Total   36.8   31.5   -­‐5  

Totals   Building  Total  CO2   449.6   305.5   -­‐144  

Building  sf   23273.0   23273.0  lbs  CO2/sf   38.6   26.2   -­‐12.4  

56%  -­‐  Structure  

24%  -­‐  Envelope  

12%  -­‐  Finishes  

8%  -­‐  MEP  

Page 20: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

PORTOLA  VALLEY  TOWN  CENTER

Passive  Design          Efficient  Systems:  

-­‐     Natural  light      -­‐  Radiant  Slabs  –  97%  efficient  Boilers  -­‐     Natural  VenTlaTon    -­‐  Ultra  efficient    air  condiToners  –  SEER  19  -­‐     Thermal  Mass      -­‐  100%  outside  air  venTlaTon  –  30%  above  ASHRAE  -­‐     Well  insulated  shell    -­‐  Indirect  energy  recovery  between  inlet  and  relief  air  -­‐     External  Shading              -­‐    76  KW  Photo  voltaic  roof  top  system      -­‐     ReflecTve  Roofs      -­‐    Low-­‐flow  fixtures  –  waterless  urinals,  dual  flush  

                 

ConstrucTon vs Operating Emissions

Page 21: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Embodied  Emissions  /  OperaTng  Emissions  –  over  100  years  

Tons  

0  

2000  

4000  

6000  

8000  

10000  

12000  

14000  

16000  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11  

1880  

15000  

 10          20                30                    40          50                    60                    70      80              90                  100       Years  

ConstrucTon  12%  of  OperaTng  

1080  ConstrucTon  

OperaTng  

Page 22: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Tons  

0  

2000  

4000  

6000  

8000  

10000  

12000  

14000  

16000  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   Years  

14%  

 10          20                30                    40          50                    60                    70      80              90                  100      

1200  

8500  

850  

Embodied  Emissions  /  OperaTng  Emissions  –  over  100  years  Efficient, Low Carbon Building

ConstrucTon  

OperaTng  

Page 23: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Tons  

0  

2000  

4000  

6000  

8000  

10000  

12000  

14000  

16000  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   Years    10          20                30                    40          50                    60                    70      80              90                  100      

1200  

8500  

850  

Embodied  Emissions  /  OperaTng  Emissions  

ConstrucTon  

OperaTng  

Page 24: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Tons  

Years  

1700    

Embodied  Emissions  /  OperaTng  Emissions  –  over  20  years  

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

2500  

3000  

3500  

4000  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20  

850    

Efficient, Low Carbon Building

ConstrucTon  

OperaTng  

ConstrucTon  50%  of  OperaTng  

Page 25: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Tons  

Years  

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

2500  

3000  

3500  

4000  

4500  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20  

1080  tons  

3000  tons  

4080  tons  

Embodied  Emissions  &  OperaTng  Emissions  are  addiTve  

Standard  Building  

Page 26: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Tons  

Years  0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

2500  

3000  

3500  

4000  

4500  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20  

850  Tons  

1700  Tons  

2550  tons  

Efficient, Low Carbon Building

Embodied  Emissions  &  OperaTng  Emissions  are  addiTve  

Page 27: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

WHY FOCUS ON EMBODIED CARBON?

•  Time Value of Carbon Savings Carbon saved now is worth more than Carbon later (area under the line is total carbon emitted)

10%  reduc?on  per  year  

Start  slow  -­‐  increase  rate  of  reduc?on  

Start  fast  -­‐  decrease  rate  of  reduc?on  

Time

Car

bon

Red

uctio

n

Page 28: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

82  

193  

Commercial

Residen?al

275  

Existing Building Stock - Billions Square Feet

Page 29: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Annual Construction – Billions of Square Feet

2.4  

2.2  

2.4  

2.2  

Commercial

Residen?al

~4.6  Billion  S.F.    

New      

~4.6  Billion  S.F.    

Renovated      

Page 30: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

90  

44  

~134  Million  Tons  

New  

Commercial  –  75lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  40lbs/sf  

24  

16.5  

~40.5  Million  Tons  

Renovated  

Commercial  –  20lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  15lbs/sf  

Annual Construction Emissions – 174 M tons

Commercial

Residen?al

Page 31: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

60  

27.5  

New  –  Reduced  CO2  

Commercial  –  50lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  25lbs/sf  

~87.5  Million  Tons  

24  

16.5  

~40.5  Million  Tons  

Renovated  

Commercial  –  20lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  15lbs/sf  

Reduced Carbon Construction Emissions – 128 M tons

Commercial

Residen?al

Page 32: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Reduce New Construction SF, Increase Renovations

1.9  

1.7  

3.6  Billion  S.F.    New      

2.9  

2.7  

~5.6  Billion  S.F.    (+1  billion  Renovated      

(-­‐1  billion)   (+1  billion)  

Commercial

Residen?al

Page 33: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

New  

Commercial  –  75lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  25lbs/sf  

~105  Million  Tons  

71  

34  

24  

16.5  

~40.5  Million  Tons  

Renovated  

Commercial  –  20lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  15lbs/sf  

Commercial

Residen?al

Reduce New Construction SF, Increase Renovations Annual Construction Emissions – 145 M tons

Page 34: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

24  

16.5  

~40.5  Million  Tons  

Renovated  

Commercial  –  20lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  15lbs/sf  

48  

21  

~69  Million  Tons  

New  –  Reduced  CO2  

Commercial  –  75lbs/sf  ResidenTal    –  25lbs/sf  

Commercial

Residen?al

Reduce New Construction SF, Increase Renovations, and Reduce Construction Emissions Annual Construction Emissions – 109 M tons

Page 35: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

Data Sources

Databases  

•  NREL  Data  (US  specific)  •  ICE  Database  (Inventory  of  Carbon  and  Energy)                                        

Bath  University  -­‐  UK  /  EU  /  Global  data  

•  Ecoinvent  (Global  /  European  data)  •  Franklin  Data  (transportaTon  of  materials)  

Carbon  Analysis  Programs  

•  Athena  InsTtute-­‐  reasonably  transparent  •  Assembly  Calculator  –  free  •  Impact  EsTmator  –  fee  for  download  

•  SimaPro  –  free  demo,  reasonably  transparent  •  URBEMIS  –  free,  transparent  •  EPA  WAste  ReducTon  Model  (WARM)  –  free,  transparent  •  ConstructCO2  –  beta  

Page 36: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

The Value of Data

Measurement  "  .  .  .  careful  measurement  is  a  way  of  discovering  new  things,  not  just  checking  the  status  quo.  Monitoring  is  not  just  a  necessary  handmaiden  of  science  -­‐  it  is  the  real  thing."    

(Economist,  March  6,  2010,  "Monitoring  Greenhouse  Gases:  Highs  and  Lows”,  thanks  to  Peter  Morris)  

Page 37: Reducing Embodied Carbon - COTE 3/8/2011

PORTOLA  VALLEY  TOWN  CENTER Goring & Straja Architects