ref : 25formexa -...

SPO only

MPO only

SKILL TEST

ATO informations

Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens

* In capital letters

IR

Revalidation

Renewal

Type rating :

REVALIDATION

RENEWAL

Skill

test

Pr

ofic

ienc

y ch

eck

TRAINING AND REPORT FORM - HPA COMPLEX TYPE RATING, SKILL TEST AND PROFICIENCY CHECK AEROPLANES (A)

Date of birth:

Type of licence held:

Licence number:

State of licence issue:Appl

ican

t Last name(s)*:

First name(s)*:

CAT-II/III

ATO name : Dates :

Skill test and proficiency check details:

Aerodrome or site:

Total flight time:

Pass Partial Pass**

Date of exam:

FSTD variant registration:

Examiner’s certificate number:

Fail**

I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL. I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theoretical knowledge examination when applicable.

Revalidation of TR only: 10 route sectors or 1 route sector with an examiner or combined LPC/OPC acc. to FCL 740.A (a)(3)

I confirm that in the event of a partial pass or fail I must not exercise the privileges of the rating until a full pass has been obtained.

Applicant name(s)* and signature:

In case of Partial Pass or Fail :

Date of exam:

IR

CAT-II/III Pass Fail**

TR IRTR

Examiner’s certificate number:

Type and licence number :

Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:

I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL. I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theoretical knowledge examination when applicable.

Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:

Pass Fail**

Aerodrome or site:

FSTD variant registration:

Type and licence number :

Total flight time:

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

In case of aircraft used instead of an FSTD :

Block-off time:

Total flight time:

Aircraft variant/registration:

Block-off time:

Aircraft variant/registration:

Total flight time:

I, the undersigned TRE(A)/SP or Training Postholder ofDeclare that no simulator is currently available for the applicable type of aircraftRequest this unavailability to be taken into accountCertify that I will operate the flight test / check according to all safety procedures and notes included in the following safety manual:

o o Generic safety manual (MET or MER), published by DSAC and available here: http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/Manuels-securite-Avion-certifie.html

Aircraft

FSTD

Block-on time: Block-on time:

OPERATIONS :

MPO and SPO

First attempt Second attempt

** Give in page 06 reasons and details of any further training required*** The examiner will tick if the applicant doesn’t meet the requirements of

OSD Part 21 to act as a PIC

Date of exam: Date of exam:

SPO section Pass Fail**

Signature

I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 8 and 9 of this form.

Validation of European IR/PBN I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 8 and 9 of this form.

Validation of European IR/PBN

Pass Fail**European IR/PBN

Only in case of initial rating or renewal of expired rating:

EASA Part FCL Appendix 9

Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman

75720 PARIS CEDEX 1501/09

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

DGAC/EASA - 01.2019

Language in which the test has been conducted : EnglishFrench

Date : Signature :

NON-FRENCH EXAMINER ONLYI hereby declare that I, ____________________________ , have reviewed and applied the relevant national procedures and requirements of the applicant’s competent authority contained in the latest version of the Examiner Differences Document.

PRACTICAL TRAINING TYPE RATING SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK

Manoeuvres/ProceduresNote : Training shall includeMCC for each item, if MPO

Instructor initials &

date training completed

Checked inFSTD A/COTD FTD FFS

1.1 Performance calculation P

1.2 Aeroplane external visualinspection; location of each itemand purpose of inspection

P#

1.3 Cockpit inspection

1.4 Use of checklist prior tostarting engines, starting procedures, radio and navigation equipment check, selection and setting of navigation and communication frequencies

1.5 Taxiing in compliance withair tra�c control or instructions of instructor

1.6 Before take-o� checks

Applicant's licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens

DGAC/EASA - 01.2019 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman


2 attempt

FailPass

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

1 attempt

FailPass

FTD 2+

FNPT2A

2.1 Normal take-o�s withdi�erent �ap settings, includedexpedited take-o�s

2.2* Instrument take-o�; transition to instrument �ight isrequired during rotation orimmediately after becomingairborne

2.3 Crosswind take-o�

1. Flight preparation

SECTION 1 Insert examiner’s initials only

2. Take-o�s

SECTION 2

2.4 Take-o� at maximum take-o� mass (actual or simulatedmaximum take-o� mass)

2.5 Take-o�s with simulatedengine failure2.5.1* Shortly after reaching V2

OR2.5.2* Between V1 and V2

(in aeroplanes which are not certi�cated as transport category or commuter category aeroplanes, the engine failure shall not be simulated until reaching a minimumheight of 500 ft above runway end. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-o� mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure shortly after reaching V2)

2.6 Rejected take-o� at a reasonable speed before reaching V1

3. Flight manoeuvres andprocedures

SECTION 3

3.1 Turns with and withoutspoilers

3.2 Tuck under and Machbu�ets after reaching the criticalMach number, and other speci�c�ight characteristics of the aeroplane (e.g. Dutch Roll)

3.3 Normal operation of systemsand controls engineer’s panel

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

X

X

X

M

M

M if 2.5.2has not beencompleted

M FFS onlyif no FFS isavailable, item2.5.1 has to be completed

M

(an a/c may not be used)

PRACTICAL TRAINING

Manoeuvres/ProceduresNote : Training shall includeMCC for each item







2 attempt

FailPass

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

1 attempt

FailPass

FTD 2+

FNPT2A

3.4.0 Engine (if necessarypropeller)

3.4.1 Pressurisation andair-conditioning

3.4.2 Pilot/static system

3.4.3 Fuel system

3.4.4 Electrical system

3.4.5 Hydraulic system

3.4.6 Flight control andTrim-system

3.4.7 Anti-icing/de-icing system,Glare shield heating

3.4.8 Autopilot/Flight director

3.4.9 Stall warning devices or stall avoidance devices, andstability augmentation devices

3.4.10 Ground proximity warningsystem, weather radar, radioaltimeter, transponder

3.4.11 Radios, navigation equipment, instruments, �ightmanagement system

3.4.12 Landing gear and brake

3.4.13 Slat and �ap system

3.4.14 Auxiliary power unit

3.6.1 Fire drills e.g. engine, APU,cabin, cargo compartment, �ightdeck, wing and electrical �resincluding evacuation

3.6.2 Smoke control and removal

3.6.3 Engine failures, shut-downand restart at a safe height

3.6.4 Fuel dumping (simulated)

3.6.5 Windshear at take-o�/landing

3.6.6 Simulated cabin pressurefailure/emergency descent

3.6.7 Incapacitation of �ightcrew member

3.6.8 Other emergencyprocedures as outlined in theAeroplane Flight Manual

3.6.9 TCAS event

3.7 Steep turns with 45° bank,180° to 360° left and right

3.8 Early recognition and countermeasures on approaching stall (up to activation of stall warning device) in take-o� con�guration(�aps in take-o� position). In cruising �ight con�guration and in landing con�guration (�aps inlanding position, gear extended)

3.8.1 Recovery from full stall orafter activation of stall warningdevice in climb, cruise andapproach con�guration

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

P

P

PPPP

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

X

X

X

X

M in SPO only

TYPE RATING SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK

3.4 Normal and abnormal operations of following systems

M A mandatory minimum of 3 abnormal itemsshall be selected from 3.4.0 to 3.4.14 inclusive

3.6 Abnormal and emergencyprocedures

M A mandatory minimum of 3 abnormal itemsshall be selected from 3.6.1 to 3.6.9 inclusive

PRACTICAL TRAINING








2 attempt

FailPass

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

1 attempt

FailPass

FTD 2+

FNPT2A

3.9.1* Adherence to departureand arrival routes and ATCinstructions

3.9.2* Holding procedures

3.9.3.1* Manually, without�ight director3.9.3.2* Manually, with �ight director

3.9.3.3* With autopilot

3.9.3.4* Manually, with one engine simulated inoperative; engine failure has to be simulated during �nal approach before passing 1 000 feet above aerodrome level until touchdown or through the complete missed approach procedure

In aeroplanes which are not certi�cated as transport category aeroplanes (JAR/ FAR 25) or as commuter category aeroplanes (SFAR 23), the approach with simulated engine failure and the ensuing go-around shall be initiated in conjunction with the non-precision approach as described in 3.9.4. The go-around shall be initiated when reaching the published obstacle clearance height (OCH/A), however not later than reaching a minimum descent height/altitude (MDH/A) of 500 feet above runway threshold elevation. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-o� mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure in accordance with 3.9.3.4.

3.9.4* 2D operations down tothe MDH/A

3.9.5 Circling approach underthe following conditions(a)* approach to speci�ed minimum circling altitude/heightin simulated IMCFollowed by :(b) circling approach to anotherrunway at least 90° o�centreline from �nal approachused in item (a)Remark : if (a) and (b) are not possible due ATC, simulated lowvisibility pattern may beperformed

SECTION 4

4. Missed Approach Procedures

4.1 Go-around with all enginesoperating during a 3D operationon reaching decision height

4.2 Other missed approach

4.3* Manually go-around with critical engine simulated inoperative after an instrumentapproach on reachind DH, MDH,or MAPt

4.4 Rejected landing at 15m(50 ft) above runway thresholdand go-around

SECTION 5

5.1 Normal landings with visual refe-rence established when reaching DA/H following an instrument apporachoperation

5.2 Landing with simulatedjammed horizontal stabiliser inanyout-of-trim position

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

5. Landings

P

P

P

P

P

P

P*

P*

P*

P*

P*

P*

P

P

M

M

M

X

M skill testonly

M


3.9.3* 3D operations to DH/A of 200 feet (60 m) or to higher minima if required by the approach procedureNote: According to the AFM, RNP APCH procedures may require the use of autopilot or Flight director. The procedure to be �own manually shall be chosen taking

into account such limitations (for example, choose an ILS for 3.9.3.1 in case of such AFM limitation).

3.9 Instrument �ight procedures

PRACTICAL TRAINING








2 attempt

FailPass

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

1 attempt

FailPass

FTD 2+

FNPT2A

5.3 Cross wind landings

5.4 Tra�c pattern and landingwithout extended or with partly extended �aps and slats

5.5 Landing with critical enginesimulated inoperative

5.6 Landing with two enginessimulated inoperative

(aeroplanes with 3 engines : the centre engine and the outboard engine as far as practicable according to data ofthe AFM. Aeroplanes with 4 engines : two enginesat one side)

General remark :Special requirements for extension of a type rating for instrument approaches down to a decision height of less than 60m (200 ft) i.e. Cat II/III operations

SECTION 6

6. Type rating for instrument approaches down to a decision height of less than 60m (200 ft) ( CAT II/III)The following manoeuvres and procedures are the minimum training requirements to permit instrument approaches down to a DH of less than 60m (200 ft).During the following instrument approaches and missed approach procedures all aeroplane equipment required for type certi�cation of instrument approaches down to a DH of less than 60m (200 ft) shall be used.

6.1* Rejected take-o� at aminimum authorised RVR

6.2* CAT II/III approaches. In simulated IMC down to DH, using �ight guidance system. Standardprocedures shall be observed

6.3* Go-around from DH

6.4* Landings with visualreference established at DH.(auto-land if �tted)

Note : CAT II/III operations shall be accomplished in accordance with the applicable air operations requirements.

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

In case of SPO privileges in addition with MPO, following exercices must be accomplished in SPO: 2.5 Take-offs with simulated engine failure

2.5.1* Shortly after reaching V2

OR2.5.2* Between V1 and V2

4.3* Manually go-around with critical engine simulated inoperative after an instrumentapproach on reachind DH, MDH,or MAPt

P

P

P

P

P*

P

P

P

P

P

P*

X

X

X

M

M skill testonly

M

M

M

M

M in SPO

M in SPO

M in SPO

P


(in aeroplanes which are not certi�cated as transport category or commuter category aeroplanes, the engine failure shall not be simulated until reaching a minimumheight of 500 ft above runway end. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-o� mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure shortly after reaching V2)

(the training also shall include a go-around due to (simulated) insu�cient RVR, wind shear, aeroplane deviation in excess of approach limits for a successful approach,and ground/airborne equipment failure prior to reaching DH and, go-around with simulated airborne equipment failure.

3.9.3.4* Manually, with one engine simulated inoperative; engine failure has to be simulated during �nal approach before passing 1 000 feet above aerodrome level until touchdown or through the complete missed approach procedure

In aeroplanes which are not certi�cated as transport category aeroplanes (JAR/ FAR 25) or as commuter category aeroplanes (SFAR 23), the approach with simulated engine failure and the ensuing go-around shall be initiated in conjunction with the non-precision approach as described in 3.9.4. The go-around shall be initiated when reaching the published obstacle clearance height (OCH/A), however not later than reaching a minimum descent height/altitude (MDH/A) of 500 feet above runway threshold elevation. In aeroplanes having the same performance as a transport category aeroplane regarding take-o� mass and density altitude, the instructor may simulate the engine failure in accordance with 3.9.3.4.

M if 2.5.2 has not been completed

M in SPO

PRACTICAL TRAINING








2 attempt

FailPass

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

1 attempt

FailPass

FTD 2+

FNPT2A

3.4 Normal and abnormal operations of following systems

3.4.0 Engine (if necessarypropeller)

3.4.1 Pressurisation andair-conditioning

3.4.2 Pilot/static system

3.4.3 Fuel system

3.4.4 Electrical system

3.4.5 Hydraulic system

3.4.6 Flight control andTrim-system

3.4.7 Anti-icing/de-icing system,Glare shield heating

3.4.8 Autopilot/Flight director

3.4.9 Stall warning devices or stall avoidance devices, andstability augmentation devices

3.4.10 Ground proximity warningsystem, weather radar, radioaltimeter, transponder

3.4.11 Radios, navigation equipment, instruments, �ightmanagement system

3.4.12 Landing gear and brake

3.4.13 Slat and �ap system

3.4.14 Auxiliary power unit

TRA

ININ

G A

ND

REP

OR

T FO

RM

HPA

CO

MPL

EX T

YPE

RA

TIN

G,

SK

ILL

TES

T A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K A

ERO

PLA

NES

5.5 Landing with critical enginesimulated inoperative P

P

P

PPP

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

SPO section Pass Fail

Remarks **Give reasons and details of any further training:

M in SPO

M in SPO

X

Result to be reported on page 01


M in SPO At least 1 abnormal itemshall be selected from 3.4.0 to 3.4.14 inclusive




Ref

: 25

Form

exaTR

AIN

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RT

FOR

M H

PA C

OM

PLEX

TYP

E R

ATI

NG

, S

KIL

L TE

ST

AN

D P

RO

FIC

IEN

CY

CH

ECK

AER

OPL

AN

ES

6. Multi-pilot aeroplanes and single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes:

(a) The following symbols mean:

P = Trained as PIC or Co-pilot and as PF and PNF for the issue of a type rating as applicable.

X = Simulators shall be used for this exercise, if available; otherwise an aircraft shall be used if appropriate for the manoeuvre or procedure.

P# = The training shall be complemented by supervised aeroplane inspection.

(b) The practical training shall be conducted at least at the training equipment level shown as (P), or may be conducted up to any higher equipment level shown by the arrow (———>).

The following abbreviations are used to indicate the training equipment used:

A = Aeroplane

FFS = Full Flight Simulator

FTD = Flight Training Device

OTD = Other Training Devices

(c) The starred items (*) shall be �own solely by reference to instruments. If this condition is not met during the skill test or pro�ciency check, the type rating will be restricted to VFR only.

(d) Where the letter ‘M’ appears in the skill test or pro�ciency check column this will indicate the mandatory exercise.

(e) An FFS shall be used for practical training and testing if the FFS forms part of an approved type rating course. The following considerations will apply to the approval of the course:

(i) the quali�cation of the FFS or FNPT II;

(ii) the quali�cations of the instructors;

(iii) the amount of FFS or FNPT II training provided on the course; and

(iv) the quali�cations and previous experience on similar types of the pilot under training.

(f) Manoeuvres and procedures shall include MCC for multi-pilot aeroplane and for single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes in multi-pilot operations.

(g) Manoeuvres and procedures shall be conducted in single-pilot role for single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes in single-pilot operations.

(h) In the case of single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes, when a skill test or pro�ciency check is performed in multi-pilot operations, the type rating shall be restricted to multi-pilot operations. If privileges of single-pilot are sought, the manoeuvres/procedures in 2.5, 3.9.3.4, 4.3, 5.5 and at least one manoeuvre/procedure from section 3.4 have to be completed in addition as single-pilot.

(i) In case of a restricted type rating issued in accordance with FCL.720.A(e), the applicants shall ful�l the same requirements as other applicants for the type rating except for the practical exercises relating to the take-o� and landing phases.

Extract of appendix 9 of EU regulation No 1178/2011:

(j) To establish or maintain PBN privileges one approach shall be an RNP APCH. Where an RNP APCH is not practicable, it shall be performed in an appropriately equipped FSTD.


DGAC/EASA - 01.2019 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman

75720 PARIS CEDEX 15

EASA-FCL Appendix 908/09

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

VALIDATION OF EUROPEAN IR/PBNINSTRUCTION TO EXAMINERSValid from 25/08/2017 until 25/08/2018

Introduction

Following the enforcement of EU 2016/539 regulation (training checking of pilots for PBN operations), the purpose of this note is to provide examiners (especially “non-French examiners”)with proper instruction to conduct the assessment of pilots holding an EASA licence administrated by France for transition to European IR/PBN.

It is reminded that European IR/PBN will be mandatory (and be recorded in the licence) to operate PBN classified airspaces or PBN approaches procedures latest from 25/08/2018.

The procedure described thereafter will enable examiners to deliver the European IR/PBN :

• to pilots having attended an EASA approved PBN course in an ATO, or

• to pilots holding a RNAV/GNSS course certificate provided by an EASA approved ATO or anEuropean Airline (grandfathering procedure)

Procedure for Grandfathering

These pilots must attend an approved PBN course in an EASA approved ATO (ground + flight/FSTD training + checking).

Until 25/08/2020, French licence holders are eligible for validation of European IR/PBN during their LPC, provided they :

1. can justify to their examiner having completed a PBN course (equivalent to the coursedescribed in regulation EU 2016/539 article 1 (1)(2)) by providing a certificate delivered byan European AOC operator,

2. answer to a satisfactory level an oral questionnaire covering main PBN topics during thebriefing prior to the LPC session (see guidance further in this note),

3. are assessed as competent when performing at least one 2D or one 3D approach based onGNSS during the flight/FSTD session of the LPC.

All 3 items above must be covered

Note 1: the certificate stated in (1) has no formal defined format. It must clearly state that the applicant has been trained (theoretical course + in-flight/FSTD training) in all PBN concepts, especially RNP GNSS approaches. Once checked, the certificate is to stay with the holder.

Preparation of the applicant for the oral questionnaire

It is highly advisable that applicants self-prepare themselves for the oral examination. For this purpose, they can study any updated and detailed document on the subject (the list of training objectives is detailed in AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS”). Normally, knowledge and guidance included in the Operator Manual should be sufficient. Note that DGAC provides a comprehensive PBN guide (in French language) downloadable on DGAC website.

Procedure for the validation of European IR/PBN for pilots not eligible for the RNAV/GNSS course certificate (not eligible for grandfathering)


DGAC/EASA - 01.2019 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman

75720 PARIS CEDEX 15

EASA-FCL Appendix 909/09

Ref

: 25

Form

exa

Examiners entitled to conduct IR/PBN evaluationDuring the transition period (from 25/08/2017 until 25/08/2018), only EASA certified examiner are entitled to conduct the evaluation for validation of European IR/PBN and only if they:

• hold an European IR/PBN, or

• are trained in RNAV/GNSS procedures via the completion of a course provided by an EASAapproved ATO or a European AOC operator

Revalidation of IR/PBN

Once validated, IR/PBN must be revalidated at each LPC by the successful completion of either one 2D or one 3D approach based on GNSS. The examiner shall confirm the revalidation by ticking the corresponding box on the paper or electronic report form.

Additional information to examiner concerning the oral questionnaire

Examiners are requested to ask 8 questions. Pass rate is 75% (6 good answers)

Questions must cover both theoretical aspects of RNAV/PBN (principles, parameters like accuracy, integrity, continuity, functionality, navigation specifications, designation of specifications especially the ones commonly used by the candidate in operations) and practical aspects (use of PBN, SOPs, MEL practice, associated NOTAMs, RNP APP technique, etc.). When preparing their questions, examiners can use the operator OM and/or official documents like AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS” and ICAO doc 9613. French readers can usefully refer to the comprehensive document mentioned earlier in this note.

Paperwork to be completed by examiner for the validation of European IR/PBN

After having conducted the evaluation as described above, the examiner shall either:

• Tick the corresponding boxes on the paper Training and Report Form for LPC, or

• For examiner having access to the internet system SIGEBEL, tick thecorresponding box on the test record page.

Note: it is mandatory to use the latest version of the French TRF (Training and Report Form) including the corresponding tick-boxes. It is downloadable on DGAC website.

Reminder: only examiners administrated by France are entitled to write on the licence of the holder of an EASA licence administrated by France (under conditions). Non-French examiners must only fill-in the TRF. The LPC and the PBN mention will be entered in the licence by a French licence officer.

The box « European IR/PBN » / PASS/FAIL must be ticked for the first validation of European PBN and on each revalidation.

The box « Validation of European IR/PBN » must be ticked for the first validation only.

ref : 25formexa -...

Documents