References

Aissen, Judith and David Perlmutter1976 Clause reduction in Spanish. In: Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whis-

tler, Vicki Edge, Jeri Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck,Christopher Smeall and Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Proceed-ings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Soci-ety (BLS 2), 1-30. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.

1983 Clause reduction in Spanish. In: David Perlmutter (ed.) Studies inRelational Grammar 1, 360-403. Chicago: The University of Chi-cago Press.

Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele and Tomas Wasow1979 The category AUX in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10:

1-64.Alsina, Alex

1992 On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23:517-555.

Baker, Mark1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function Changing. Chi-

cago: The University of Chicago Press.Barbiers, Sjef

1995 The syntax of interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lei-den, The Netherlands. [Distributed by: Holland Academic Graphics(HIL), The Hague.]

Bayer, Josef and Jacqueline Kornfilt1990 Restructuring effects in German. In: Elisabet Engdahl, Mike Reape,

Martin Mellor and Richard Cooper (eds.), Parametric variation inGermanic and Romance: Center of Cognitive Science Working Pa-pers, 21-42. Edinburgh: ICCS, University of Edinburgh.

Bech, Gunnar1955 Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum. Tübingen: Max Nie-

meyer Verlag.Belletti, Adriana

1990 Generalized verb movement: Aspects of verb syntax. Turin: Rosen-berg & Sellier.

Bennis, Hans and Teun Hoekstra1989 Why Kaatje was not heard sing a song. In: Dany Jaspers, Wim

Klooster, Yvan Putseys and Pieter Seuren (eds.), Sentential com-plementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest,21-40. Dordrecht: Foris.

References 347

Besten, Hans den and Jean Rutten1989 On verb raising, extraposition and free word order in Dutch. In:

Dany Jaspers, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys and Pieter Seuren(eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in hon-our of Wim de Geest, 41-56. Dordrecht: Foris.

Bhatt, Rajesh1998 Obligation and possession. In: Heidi Harley (ed.), Papers from the

UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect: MITWorking Papers in Linguistics 32: 21-40.

Bobaljik, Jonathan David1995 Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. Dissertation,

MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

1998 Floating quantifiers: Handle with care. Glot International 3: 3-10.Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Höskuldur Thráinsson

1998 Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37-71.Bobaljik, Jonathan and Susi Wurmbrand

1999 Modals, raising & A-reconstruction. Talk given at Leiden Univer-sity, The Netherlands, and University of Salzburg, Austria[http://web.mit.edu/susi/www/Leiden.pdf].

2001 Reconstruction and A-traces: A reply to Lasnik (1999). Ms. Mon-tréal, Québec: McGill University.

Boivin, Marie Claude1998 Complementation and interpretation: The concrete and imaginative

readings of visual perception verbs. In: Uli Sauerland and OrinPercus (eds.), The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Lin-guistics 25: 103-123.

Bok-Bennema, Reineke and Brigitte Kampers-Manhe1994 Transparency effects in the Romance languages. In: Michael Maz-

zola (ed.) Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected pa-pers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII,199-217. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Borer, Hagit1989 Anaphoric AGR. In: Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth Safir (eds.), The

null subject parameter, 69-109. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub-lishers.

Bos�kovic

�, Z�eljko

1995 Principles of economy in nonfinite complementation. Ph.D. Dis-sertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. [Published asBos

�kovic

� 1997.]

1996 Selection and the categorial status of Infinitival Complements.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 269-304.

1997 The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

348 References

Bouchard, Denis1984 On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.

Brennan, Virginia1993 Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs in English. Ph.D. Dis-

sertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Distributed by:Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Amherst, Mass.]

Bresnan, Joan1971 Sentence stress and transformations. Language 47: 257-297.1982 Control and complementation. In: Joan Bresnan (ed.) The mental

representation of grammatical relations, 282-390. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press.

Brody, Michael1995 Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory. Cambridge,

Mass: MIT Press.Broekhuis, Hans

1992 Chain-government: Issues in Dutch syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation,University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [Distributed by: Hol-land Academic Graphics (HIL), The Hague.]

Broekhuis, Hans, Hans den Besten, Kees Hoekstra and Jean Rutten1995 Infinitival complementation in Dutch: On remnant extraposition.

The Linguistic Review 12: 93-122.Browning, Marguerite

1987 Null operator constructions. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cam-bridge, Mass.]

Burzio, Luigi1986 Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Cattell, R.1978 On the source of interrogative adverbs. Language 54: 61-77.

Chierchia, Gennaro1983 Outline of a semantic theory of (obligatory) control. In: Michael

Barlow, David P. Flickinger and Michael T. Westcoat (eds.), Pro-ceedings of the 2nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics(WCCFL 2), 19-31. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Associa-tion.

1984 Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds. In: Mark Cobler,Susannah MacKaye and Michael T. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings ofthe 3rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 3),28-39. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.

1984b Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds.Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Dis-tributed by: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Amherst,Mass.]

References 349

1989 Anaphora and attitudes de se. In: Renate Bartsch, J. van Benthemand P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression,1-32. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.1980 On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1-46.1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and

Binding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1986a Barriers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1986b Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik1993 Principles and parameters theory. In: Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von

Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syn-tax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 506-569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

1995 Principles and parameters theory. In: Noam Chomsky (ed.) TheMinimalist Program, 13-127. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo1990a Two classes of intransitive adjectives in Italian. In: Günther Gre-

wendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers,261-349. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

1990b Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1997a The interaction of passive, causative, and ‘restructuring’ in Ro-

mance. Ms. Venice: University of Venice.1997b Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. Ms.

Venice: University of Venice.1998 On clitic climbing and other transparency effects. Talk given at

MIT, Cambridge, Mass.1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Ox-

ford, UK: Oxford University Press.2000 “Restructuring” and functional structure. Ms. Venice: University of

Venice.Comrie, Bernard

1984 Subject and object control: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Ber-keley Linguistic Society, 450-464.

Cremers, C.1983 On two types of infinitival complementation. In: Frank Heny and

Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and re-lated puzzles, 169-221.1.) Dordrecht: Reidel.

Declerck, Renaat1981 On the role of progressive aspect in nonfinite perception verb com-

plements. Glossa 15: 83-114.

350 References

1982 The triple origin of participial perception verb complements. Lin-guistic Analysis 10: 1-26.

1983 On the passive of infinitival perception verb complements. Journalof English Linguistics 16:

Dikken, Marcel den1996 The minimal links of verb (projection) raising. In: Werner Abra-

ham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson and Jan-Wouter C. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in theminimalist framework, 67-96. (Linguistik Aktuell 12.) Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

DiSciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams1987 On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Erb, Marie Christine2001 Finite auxiliaries in German. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Til-

burg, The Netherlands.Evers, Arnold

1975a The Guillotine principle. In: A. Kraak (ed.) Linguistics in the Neth-erlands 1972-1973, 147. Amsterdam: Von Gorcu.

1975b The transformational cycle of Dutch and German. Ph.D. Disserta-tion, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

1986 Clause union in French and German. Groninger Arbeiten zur ger-manistischen Linguistik 28: 170-201.

1988 Non-finite verb forms and subject theta assignment. In: Martin Ev-eraert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybregts and Mieke Trommelen(eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of Henk Schultink,105-128. Dordrecht: Foris.

1990 The infinitival prefix “zu” as INFL. In: Günther Grewendorf andWolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, 217-238.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Fanselow, Gisbert1989 Coherent infinitives in German. In: Christa Bhatt, Elisabeth Löbel

and Claudia Schmidt (eds.), Syntactic phrase structure phenomenain noun phrases and sentences, 1-16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Farkas, Donka1988 On obligatory control. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 27-58.

Felser, Claudia1998 Perception and control: a minimalist analysis of English direct per-

ception complements. Journal of Linguistics 34: 351-385.Fiengo, Robert

1974 Semantic Conditions on Surface Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

References 351

Fox, Daniel1998 Economy and semantic interpretation: A study of scope and vari-

able binding. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Pub-lished as Fox 2000.]

1999 Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains.Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157-196.

2000 Economy and semantic interpretation. (Linguistic Inquiry Mono-graph 35.) Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/MITWPL.

Gonçalves, Anabela1998 On restructuring constructions in European Portuguese. In: Tina

Cambier-Langeveld, Aníkó Lipták and Michael Redford (eds.),Proceedings of ConSOLE 6, 75-88. Leiden: SOLE.

Goodall, Grant1987 Parallel structures in syntax. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge

University Press.1991 Wanna-contraction as restructuring. In: Carol Georgopolous and

Roberta Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language:Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 239-254. Dordrecht: Kluwer Aca-demic Publishers.

Grewendorf, Günther1984 Reflexivierungsregeln im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 1: 14-30.1987 Kohärenz und Restrukturierung. In: B. Asbach-Schnitker and J.

Roggenhofer (eds.), Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung undHistographie der Linguistik, 123-144. Tübingen: Narr.

1988 Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.Grewendorf, Günther and Joachim Sabel

1994 Long scrambling and incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 263-308.

Grimshaw, Jane1991 Extended projection. Ms. Waltham, Mass: Brandeis University.

Grinder, John T.1970 Super equi-NP deletion. Papers from the 6th regional meeting:

Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 6), 297-317.Groat, Erich and John O’Neil

1996 Spell-out at the LF interface. In: Werner Abraham, Samuel DavidEpstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson and C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.),Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, 113-139. (Linguistik Aktuell Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsPublishing Company.

Grosse, Julia2000 Kontrollprobleme bei Infinitiven: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit

“Infinitives” von Susanne Wurmbrand. M.A. Thesis, University ofTübingen, Germany.

352 References

Guasti, Maria Teresa1992 Incorporation, excorporation and lexical properties of causative

heads. The Linguistic Review 8: 209-232.1993 Causatives and perception verbs: a comparative approach. Turin:

Rosenberg and Sellier.1996 Semantic restrictions on Romance causatives and the incorporation

approach. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294-313.1997 Romance causative. In: Liliane Haegeman (ed.) The new compara-

tive syntax, 124-144. London: Longmans Linguistics Library.Guéron, Jacqueline and Teun Hoekstra

1988 T-Chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries. In: Anna Car-dinaletti, Giuliana Giusti and Guglielmo Cinque (eds.), Constituentstructure, 35-100. Dordrecht: Foris.

Hackl, Martin1998 On the semantics of “ability attributions”. Ms. Cambridge, Mass:

MIT.Haegeman, Liliane

1995 The syntax of negation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.

1996 Finite V-movement in embedded clauses in West Flemish. SouthAfrican Journal of Linguistics 29: 69-104.

Haegeman, Liliane and Henk van Riemsdijk1986 Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting

verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417-466.Haegeman, Liliane and Raffaella Zanuttini

1991 Negative heads and the NEG criterion. The Linguistic Review 8:233-251.

Haider, Hubert1986a Deutsche Syntax - generativ. Habilitationsschrift, University of

Vienna, Austria.1986b Fehlende Argumente: vom Passiv zu kohärenten Infinitiven. Lin-

guistische Berichte 101: 3-33.1986c Nicht-sententiale Infinitive. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanis-

tischen Linguistik 28: 73-114.1991a Fakultativ kohärente Infinitivkonstruktionen. Arbeitspapiere des

Sonderforschungsbereichs 340.1991b PRO-bleme? In: Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix (eds.), Struktu-

ren und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, 121-143. (Studien zurdeutschen Grammatik 39.) Tübingen: Narr.

1993 Deutsche Syntax Generativ. Tübingen: Narr.Harley, Heidi

1995 Subjects and clause structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cam-bridge, Mass.]

References 353

Hegarty, Michael1991 Adjunct extraction and chain configurations. Ph.D. Dissertation,

MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

Higginbotham, James1983 The logic of perceptual reports: an extensional alternative to situa-

tion semantics. The Journal of Philosophy 80: 100-127.1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547-593.

Hinterhölzl, Roland1997 A VP-based approach to verb raising. In: K. Kusumoto (ed.), Pro-

ceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting(NELS 27), 187-201. Amherst, Mass.: Graduate Linguistic StudentAssociation.

1998 The syntax of IPP constructions and the structure of the lower mid-dlefield in Westgermanic. In: Alexis Dimitriadis, Hikyoung Lee,Christine Moisset and Alexander Williams (eds.), Proceedings ofthe 22nd annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium: UPenn WorkingPapers in Linguistics 5.1: 59-70.

1999 Restructuring infinitives and the theory of complementation. Ph.D.Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Hoeksema, Jacob1988 A constraint on governors in the West Germanic verb cluster. In:

Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybregts and Mieke Trom-melen (eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of HenkSchultink, 147-161. Dordrecht: Foris.

Hoekstra, Teun1984 Government and the distribution of sentential complementation in

Dutch. In: Wim de Geest and Yvan Putsey (eds.), Sentential com-plementation: Proceedings of the international conference held atUFSAL, Brussels (June 1983), 105-116. Dordrecht: Foris Publica-tions.

Höhle, Tilman1978 Lexikalistische Syntax: Die Aktiv-Passiv-Relation und andere In-

finitkonstruktionen im Deutschen. (Linguistische Arbeiten 67.)Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Hoji, Hajime1985 Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese.

Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Hornstein, Norbert

1995 Logical form: From GB to Minimalism. Oxford, UK; Cambridge,Mass: Blackwell.

1998 Movement and chains. Syntax 1: 99-127.1999 Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69-96.

354 References

Iatridou, Sabine1990 About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551-577.1994 Comments on the paper by Roberts. In: David Lightfoot and Nor-

bert Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement, 243-260. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass:

MIT Press.1977 X-bar-syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT

Press.Johnson, Kyle

1990 On the syntax of inflectional paradigms. Ms. Madison, Wisconsin:University of Wisconsin.

Kageyama, Taro1993 Bunpo to Gokeisei [Grammar and Word Formation]. Kasukabe:

Hituzi Syobo.Karttunen, Lauri

1971 Implicative verbs. Language 47: 340-358.Kawasaki, Noriko

1993 Control and arbitrary interpretation in English. Ph.D. Dissertation,University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Kayne, Richard1989 Null subjects and clitic climbing. In: Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth

Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 239-261. Dordrecht: Klu-wer Academic Publishers.

1990 Romance clitics and PRO. In: Juli A. Carter, Rose-Marie Dechaine,William Philip and Tim D. Sherer (eds.), Proceedings of the NorthEastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (NELS 20), 255-302.Amherst, Mass: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.

1991 Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22:647-686.

1992 Italian negative imperatives and clitic climbing. In: L. Tasmowskyand A. Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet, 300-312.Gent: Communication and Cognition.

1998 Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1: 128-191.Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky

1970 Fact. In: M Bierwisch and K.E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in lin-guistics, 143-173. The Hague: Mouton.

1971 Fact. In: D.D. Steinberg and L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: Aninterdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology,Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

References 355

Kiss, Tibor1995 Infinite Komplementation: Neue Studien zum deutschen Verbum

infinitum. (Linguistische Arbeiten 333.) Tübingen: Max NiemeyerVerlag.

Klein, Wolfgang1994 Time in language. London and New York: Routledge.

Koizumi, Masatoshi1995 Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT,

Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Lin-guistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi2000 Verbal complexes. (Current Studies in Linguistics 34.) Cambridge,

Mass: MIT Press.Koster, Jan

1984 On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417-459.1987 Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax.

Dordrecht: Foris.Kratzer, Angelika

1977 What must and can must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy1: 337-355.

1981 The notional category of modality. In: Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer andHannes Rieser (eds.), Words, worlds and C=contexts: New ap-proaches in world semantics, 38-74. (Research in Text The-ory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 6.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

1991 Modality. In: Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.),Semantik/Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenös-sischen Forschung. An Internatonial Handbook of ContemporaryResearch., 639-650. New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

1994 On external arguments. Functional projections: University of Mas-sachusetts Occasional Papers 17: 103-130.

1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. In: Johan Rooryckand Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. (Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33.)Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kroch, Anthony and Beatrice Santorini1991 The derived constituent structure of the West Germanic verb-

raising construction. In: Robert Freidin (ed.) Principles and Pa-rameters in Comparative Grammar, 269-338. Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.

Kulick, Seth1998 Generalized transformations and restructuring in Romance. Ms.

Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

356 References

Kuno, Susumu1973 The structure of the Japanese language. (Current studies in lin-

guistics series 3.) Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1975 Super-equi-NP deletion is a pseudo-transformation. Proceedings of

the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society(NELS 5), 29-44. Amherst, Mass: Graduate Linguistic Student As-sociation.

Landau, Idan1999 Elements of control. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

[Published as Landau 2000.]2000 Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival construc-

tions. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 51.)Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Larson, Richard K.1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.

Lasnik, Howard (ed.)1989 Essays on anaphora. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic

Theory 16.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Lasnik, Howard and Robert Fiengo

1974 Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 535-571.Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito

1984 On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 235-289.

Lebeaux, David1985 Locality and anaphoric binding. The Linguistic Review 4: 343-363.1995 Where does binding theory apply? University of Maryland Working

Papers in Linguistics 3: 63-88.Li, Yafei

1990 Conditions on X˚ movement. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cam-bridge, Mass.]

Luján, Marta1980 Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements. Lin-

guistics 18: 381-484.Lyons, John

1977 Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Manzini, Rita

1982 Italian prepositions before infinitives. In: Alec Marantz and TimStowell (eds.), Papers in syntax: MIT Working Papers in Linguis-tics 4: 115-155.

1983a On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 412-446.1983b Restructuring and reanalysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,

Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cam-bridge, Mass.]

References 357

Manzini, Rita and Anna Roussou2000 A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 110: 409-

447.Marantz, Alec

1993 Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In:Sam A. Mchombo (ed.) Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar,113-150. (CSLI Lecture Notes 381.) Stanford, CA: CSLI Publica-tions.

1995 ‘Cat’ as a phrasal idiom. Ms. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the

privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics4.2: 201-225.

Martin, Roger Andrew1992 On the distribution and case features of PRO. Ms. Storrs, CT: Uni-

versity of Connecticut.1996 A minimalist theory of PRO and control. Ph.D. Dissertation, Uni-

versity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. [Distributed by: MIT WorkingPapers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

May, Robert1977 The Grammar of Quantification. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cam-

bridge, Mass.1985 Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Mass:

MIT Press.McGinnis, Martha Jo

1993 The deontic/epistemic distinction in English modals: a composi-tional analysis. M.A. Thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario.

Melvold, Janis1991 Factivity and definiteness. In: Lisa Cheng and Hamida Demirdache

(eds.), More papers on Wh-movement: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics 15: 97-117.

Meurers, Walt Detmar2000 Lexical generalizations in the syntax of German non-finite con-

structions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tübingen, Germany.Mittwoch, Anita

1990 On the distribution of bare infinitive complements in English.Journal of Linguistics 26: 103-131.

Miyagawa, Shigeru1987 Restructuring in Japanese. In: Takashi Imai and Mamoru Saito

(eds.), Issues in Japanese linguistics, 273-300. Dordrecht: Foris.Montalbetti, Mario, Mamoru Saito and Lisa Travis

1982 Three ways to get tough. Papers from the 18th regional meeting:Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 18), 348-366.

358 References

Moore, John1990 Spanish clause reduction with downstairs cliticization. In: Ka-

tarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell and Errapel Mejias-Bikandi(eds.), Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, 319-334. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information.

1994 Romance cliticization and relativized minimality. Linguistic In-quiry 25: 335-344.

Müller, Gereon1996 A constraint on remnant movement. Natural Language and Lin-

guistic Theory 14: 355-407.Napoli, Donna

1981 Semantic interpretation vs. lexical governance: clitic climbing inItalian. Language 841-887.

Neeleman, Ad1994 Complex predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University, The

Netherlands. [Distributed by: LEd (OTS Dissertation Series),Utrecht, The Netherlands.]

Nemoto, Naoko1993 Chains and case positions: A study from scrambling in Japanese.

Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. [Distrib-uted by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

Newmeyer, Frederick J.1975 English aspectual verbs. The Hague: Mouton.

Nishigauchi, Taisuke1993 Long distance passive. In: Nobuko Hasegawa (ed.) Japanese syn-

tax in comparative grammar, 79-114. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.O’Neil, John H.

1997 Means of control: deriving the properties of PRO in the MinimalistProgram. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge,Mass.

Ouhalla, Jamal1991 Functional categories and parametric variation. London and New

York: Routledge.Palmer, Frank R.

1979 Why auxiliaries are not main verbs. Lingua 47: 1-25.1983 Modality and the English modals. London and New York: Long-

man.1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Perlmutter, David1970 The two verbs ‘begin’. In: Roderick Jacobs and Peter S. Rosen-

baum (eds.), English transformational grammar, 107-119.Waltham, Mass: Ginn & Company.

References 359

Pesetsky, David1992 Zero syntax II: An essay on infinitives. Ms. Cambridge, Mass:

MIT.1997 Optimality Theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In:

Diana Archangeli and Terence D. Langendoen (eds.), OptimalityTheory: an overview, 134-170. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.

Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego2001 T-to-C movement: causes and consequences. In: Michael

Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.

Petter, Marga1998 Getting PRO under control. Ph.D. Dissertation, Netherlands

Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT), Amsterdam, The Nether-lands. [Distributed by: Holland Academic Graphics (HIL), TheHague.]

Picallo, Carme1985 Opaque domains. Ph.D. Dissertation, CUNY, New York.1990 Modal verbs in Catalan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

8: 285-312.Pollock, Jean-Yves

1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Lin-guistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.

Prinzhorn, Martin1987 T-Struktur, S-Struktur und Lexikon. M.A. Thesis, University of

Vienna, Austria.1990 Head movement and scrambling domains. In: Günther Grewendorf

and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, 199-215.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Pylkkänen, Liina1999 Causation and external arguments. In: Liina Pylkkänen, Angeliek

van Hout and Heidi Harley (eds.), Papers from the UPenn/MITroundtable on the lexicon: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35:21-40.

Radford, Andrew1977 Italian Syntax: Transformational and Relational Grammar. Cam-

bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Raposo, Eduardo

1987 Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in EuropeanPortuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 85-109.

Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.

360 References

Reuland, Eric1981 On extraposition of complement clauses. In: Victoria Burke and

James Pustejovsky (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Lin-guistics Society Annual Meeting (NELS 11), 296-318. Amherst,Mass: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.

Riemsdijk, Henk van1984 On pied-piped infinitives in German relative clauses. In: Jindrich

Toman (ed.) Studies in German Grammar, 165-192. Dordrecht:Foris.

1985 Zum Rattenfängereffekt bei Infinitiven in deutschen Relativsätzen.In: Werner Abraham (ed.) Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, 75-99. Tübingen: Narr.

1998a Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distributionof projections. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 1-48.

1998b Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language and LinguisticTheory 16: 633-678.

Rizzi, Luigi1976 Ristrutturazione. Rivista di grammatica generativa 1.1978 A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In: Samuel Jay Keyser (ed.)

Recent transformational studies in European languages, 113-158.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

1982 Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.1990 Relativized minimality. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1993 Some notes on Romance cliticization. Paper presented at the ESF

workshop on clitics., Durham, Great Britain.1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Liliane Haegeman (ed.)

Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281-337.Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Roberts, Ian1985 Agreement parameters and the development of English auxiliaries.

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.1991 Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 209-218.1993 Restructuring, pronoun movement and head-movement in Old

French. Ms. Bangor: University of Wales.1994 Two types of head movement in Romance. In: David Lightfoot and

Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement, 207-242. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.

1997 Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28:423-460.

Rochette, Anne1988 Semantic and syntactic aspects of Romance sentential comple-

mentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributedby: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

References 361

1990 On the restructuring classes of verbs in Romance. In: Anna MariaDi Sciullo and Anne Rochette (eds.), Binding in Romance: Essaysin honour of Judith McA’Nulty., 96-128. Ottawa: Canadian Lin-guistic Association.

1999 The selection properties of aspectual verbs. In: Kyle Johnson andIan Roberts (eds.), Beyond Principles and Parameters: Essays inmemory of Osvaldo Jaeggli, 145-165. Dordrecht: Kluwer Aca-demic Publishers.

Rooryck, Johan1994 Against optional movement for clitic climbing. In: Michael Maz-

zola (ed.) Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected pa-pers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII,417-443. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Rosen, Sara Thomas1989 Argument structure and complex predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation,

Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass.1990 Restructuring verbs are light verbs. In: Aaron Halpern (ed.), Pro-

ceedings of the 9th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics(WCCFL 9), 477-491. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Rosengren, Inger1992 Zum Problem der kohärenten Verben im Deutschen. In: Peter

Suchsland (ed.) Biologische und soziale Grundlagen der Sprachen,265-296. (Linguistische Arbeiten 280.) Tübingen: Max NiemeyerVerlag.

Ross, John Robert1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cam-

bridge, Mass.1969 Auxiliaries as main verbs. In: W. Todd (ed.) Studies in philosophi-

cal linguistics, 1. Evanston, IL: Great Expectations Press.Rowe, Janet

1994 English modals and the functional-lexical distinction. M.A. Thesis,University of Toronto, Ontario.

Rutten, Jean1991 Infinitival complements and auxiliaries. Ph.D. Dissertation, Uni-

versity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Sabel, Joachim

1994 Restrukturierung und Lokalität: Universelle Beschränkungen fürWortstellungsvariationen. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Frank-furt, Germany. [Published as Sabel 1996.]

1996 Restrukturierung und Lokalität: Universelle Beschränkungen fürWortstellungsvariat ionen. (Studia Grammatica 42.) Berlin:Akademie Verlag.

362 References

Safir, Ken1993 Perception, selection, and structural economy. Natural Language

Semantics 2: 47-70.Saito, Mamoru and Hiroto Hoshi

1998 Control in Complex Predicates. Ms. Nanzan and London: NanzanUniversity and SOAS.

2000 Japanese light verb construction and the Minimalist Program. In:Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step bystep: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 261-295. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Sauerland, Uli1998a The meaning of chains. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

[Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge,Mass.]

1998b Scope reconstruction without reconstruction. In: Kimary Shahin,Susan Blake and Eun-Sook Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the 17thWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 17), 582-596. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Selkirk, Elisabeth1984 Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.1986 On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3: 371-405.

Shibatani, Masayoshi1978 Nihongo no Bunseki [Analysis of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan

Shoten.Sigur

�sson, Halldór Ármann

1991 Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327-364.

Sportiche, Dominique1996 Clitic constructions. In: Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.),

Phrase structure and the lexicon, 213-276. (Studies in NaturalLanguage & Linguistic Theory 33.) Dordrecht: Kluwer AcademicPublishers.

Stechow, Arnim von1984 Gunnar Bech’s government and binding theory: GB’s GB theory.

Linguistics 22: 225-241.1990 Status government and coherence in German. In: Günther Grewen-

dorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers,143-198. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Stechow, Arnim von and Wolfgang Sternefeld1988 Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens: Ein Lehrbuch der modernen gen-

erativen Grammatik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

References 363

Sternefeld, Wolfgang1990 Scrambling and minimality. In: Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang

Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, 239-257. Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Stowell, Tim1981 The origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cam-

bridge, Mass.1982 The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561-570.1996 The phrase structure of tense. In: Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring

(eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 277-291. (Studies in Natu-ral Language & Linguistic Theory 33.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Aca-demic Publishers.

Strozer, Judith Reina1976 Clitics in Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.1981 An alternative to restructuring in Romance syntax. Papers in Ro-

mance (PRom) 3: 177-184.Tada, Hiroaki

1992 Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics14: 91-108.

1993 A/A-bar partition in derivation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cam-bridge, Mass.

Tappe, Hans Thilo1984 On infinitival clauses without COMP. In: Wim de Geest and Yvan

Putsey (eds.), Sentential complementation: Proceedings of the in-ternational conference held at UFSAL, Brussels (June 1983), 227-237. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Terzi, Arhonto1996 Clitic climbing from finite clauses and tense raising. Probus 8:

273-295.Thráinsson, Höskuldur

1996 On the (non)-universality of functional projections. In: WernerAbraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson and C.Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in theminimalist framework, 253-281. (Linguistik Aktuell 12.) Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Sten Vikner1995 Modals and double modals in the Scandinavian languages. Working

Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 51-88.Travis, Lisa deMena

1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Ph.D. Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

364 References

1994 Event phrase and a theory of functional categories. In: Päivi Koski-nen (ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of the Ca-nadian Linguistic Association (CLA), 559-570. Toronto, Ontario:Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.

2000 The L-syntax/S-syntax boundary: evidence from Austronesian. In:Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips and Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), For-mal issues in Austronesian syntax, 167-194. (Studies in NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory 49.) Dordrecht/Boston/London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Truckenbrodt, Hubert1995 Extraposition from NP and Prosodic Structure. In: Jill N. Beckman

(ed.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society AnnualMeeting (NELS 25), 503-517. Amherst, Mass: Graduate LinguisticStudent Association.

Warner, Anthony1993 English Auxiliaries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Watanabe, Akira1993 The role of equidistance in restructuring verbs: Italian vs. French.

Proceedings of the Eastern State Conference on Linguistics(ESCOL ‘93), 360-371.

Williams, Edwin1980 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203-338.

Wurmbrand, Susi1994 The German leicht construction. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 48-

50: 87-100.1997 Restructuring infinitives. In: Tina Cambier-Langeveld, João Costa,

Rob Goedemans and Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), Proceedings ofConSOLE 5, 277-292. Leiden: SOLE.

1998a Downsizing infinitives. In: Uli Sauerland and Orin Percus (eds.),The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 141-175.

1998b Infinitives. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.1999a Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In: Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie,

Jason D. Haugen and Peter Norquest (eds.), Proceedings of the18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 18),599-612. Somerville, Mass: Cascadilla Press.

1999b Where do verbs cluster: West Germanic perspectives. Paper pre-sented at the Workshop on Verb Clusters, Öttevény, Hungary[http://web.mit.edu/susi/www/Hungary.pdf].

2000a A-movement in German: AGREE and ATTRACT. Colloquiumtalk Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass [http://web.mit.edu/susi/www/Harvard.pdf].

References 365

2000b Verb clusters: variation at the right periphery. Paper presented atthe workshop on Syntactic Microvariation, Meertens Instituut, Am-sterdam [http://web.mit.edu/susi/www/SAND.pdf].

2001 Back to the future. Snipppets 3: �������� .to appear AGREE: The other VP-internal subject hypothesis. In: Karine

Megerdoomian and Leora A. Bar-el (eds.), Proceedings of the 20thWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 20).Somerville, Mass: Cascadilla Press.

in prep. Verb raising, verb clustering, and restructuring. Case entry to beincluded in The Syntax Companion (SynCom). Oxford: Blackwell.

Wyngaerd, Guido J. Vanden1994 PRO-legomena: Distribution and reference of infinitival subjects.

(Linguistic Models 19.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Yatsushiro, Kazuko

1999 Case-licensing and VP structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, University ofConnecticut, Storrs, CT. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers inLinguistics, Cambridge, Mass.]

Zagona, Karen1982 Government and proper government of verbal projections. Ph.D.

Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Zanuttini, Raffaella

1991 Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study ofRomance languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylva-nia, Philadelphia.

1996 On the relevance of tense for sentential negation. In: Adriana Bel-letti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Es-says in comparative syntax, 181-207. (Oxford studies in compara-tive syntax New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa1982 On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation,

MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Index

adjunct theta roles, 179argument structure merger, 147aspectual infinitives, 96–98, 208–14Authors

Aissen and Perlmutter, 6, 8, 12,343

Akmajian, Steele and Wasow,139

Alsina, 217Baker, 12, 14, 124, 128Barbiers, 182, 203, 204Bayer and Kornfilt, 40, 293Bech, 5, 113Belletti, 115, 124, 126Bennis and Hoekstra, 102, 103,

126, 220Bhatt, 188Bobaljik, 122, 124, 140–43Bobaljik and Thráinsson,

140–43Bobaljik and Wurmbrand, 192Boivin, 79, 217Bok-Bennema and Kampers-

Manhe, 13, 15, 123, 128Borer, 247Bos

�kovic

�, 63, 69, 70, 112, 228

Bouchard, 247Brennan, 171, 182, 189, 194Bresnan, 29, 228Brody, 122Broekhuis, 15, 23, 24, 120Broekhuis, den Besten,

Hoekstra, and Rutten, 11,102, 103, 120

Browning, 28Burzio, 14, 113, 226, 343Cattell, 303

Chierchia, 228, 248, 249, 251,253–63, 297

Chomsky, 12, 18, 28, 55, 139,188, 200, 228

Chomsky and Lasnik, 28, 69,111, 228

Cinque, 2, 8, 11, 15, 28, 31, 78,130, 131, 134, 135, 138,142, 146, 176–82, 184, 303,345

Comrie, 237Cremers, 11, 79, 100, 297, 306Declerck, 217den Besten and Rutten, 103, 120den Dikken, 20, 22–25DiSciullo and Williams, 8, 11,

12, 20Erb, 92, 163, 202Evers, 5, 12, 13, 97, 120–21Fanselow, 8, 11, 273, 344Farkas, 238Felser, 79, 217, 220Fiengo, 139Fox, 192, 195Gonçalves, 13, 15, 122Goodall, 12Grewendorf, 12, 233Grewendorf and Sabel, 8, 13,

14, 60, 122Grimshaw, 160Grinder, 247Groat and O'Neil, 122Grosse, 267, 287, 293, 317, 328,

329, 333, 334, 335, 345Guasti, 13, 15, 79, 123–24, 221Guéron and Hoekstra, 15, 126Hackl, 169

Index 367

Haegeman, 32, 79, 116Haegeman and van Riemsdijk,

12, 125Haegeman and Zanuttini, 115Haider, 11, 13, 15, 26, 29, 44,

115, 267, 287, 317, 333,335, 344

Harley, 18, 143, 155Hegarty, 303–5Higginbotham, 147, 217Hinterhölzl, 14Hoeksema, 97Hoekstra, 12, 102Höhle, 19Hoji, 51Hornstein, 177, 178, 195, 200,

246, 247Iatridou, 129, 141, 170Jackendoff, 139Johnson, 141Kageyama, 89Karttunen, 79, 153, 298Kawasaki, 237Kayne, 8, 13, 32, 101, 104, 105,

116, 123, 124, 126, 129,131

Kiparsky and Kiparsky, 299,302, 303

Kiss, 8, 15, 267, 287, 293Klein, 72Koizumi, 33, 34, 49, 53, 89Koopman and Szabolcsi, 14Koster, 23, 247Kratzer, 18, 182, 183, 226Kroch and Santorini, 103Kulick, 189Kuno, 33, 247Landau, 237, 238, 239, 240,

241, 246, 247, 250, 307Larson, 18Lasnik, 55Lasnik and Fiengo, 29Lasnik and Saito, 304

Lebeaux, 192, 246, 247Li, 11, 15Luján, 8, 130Lyons, 182Manzini, 12, 113, 237, 246, 247Manzini and Roussou, 247Marantz, 18, 108, 143, 215Martin, 63, 69, 70, 112, 228,

237May, 192McGinnis, 140, 189, 203Melvold, 303, 304Meurers, 8Mittwoch, 217, 220Miyagawa, 54, 88Montalbetti, Saito and Travis,

28, 29, 32Moore, 11Müller, 273Napoli, 8, 15, 108, 130, 146–55,

343Neeleman, 97Nemoto, 34, 87Newmeyer, 203Nishigauchi, 89O'Neil, 247Ouhalla, 141Palmer, 171, 182Perlmutter, 158, 168Pesetsky, 63, 64, 69, 79, 122,

153Pesetsky and Torrego, 307Petter, 237, 238Picallo, 8, 11, 15, 150, 184, 343Pollock, 115, 124, 125Prinzhorn, 13, 15, 179, 209Pylkkänen, 216Radford, 129Raposo, 70Reinhart and Reuland, 55Reuland, 103Rizzi, 6, 12, 13, 29, 32, 79, 104,

105, 113, 121–22, 132, 159,

368 Index

275, 343Roberts, 8, 13, 15, 29, 32, 105,

122, 123, 126, 127–29, 131,133, 146, 148, 179, 187,274

Rochette, 8, 11, 15, 100, 113,146–55, 228, 297

Rooryck, 11, 13, 15, 105–7, 123Rosen, 8, 11, 15, 113, 146–55Rosengren, 8, 11, 15Ross, 121, 187Rowe, 140Rutten, 8, 11, 13, 15, 97, 102,

103, 120, 209, 272, 284,344

Sabel, 8, 13, 14, 40, 60, 61, 115,123, 127, 128, 230, 279,293, 317, 329, 344

Safir, 217Saito and Hoshi, 34, 49Sauerland, 192Selkirk, 294Shibatani, 89Sigur

�sson, 190

Sportiche, 274Sternefeld, 8, 13, 14, 15, 122Stowell, 62–63, 69–70, 91, 99,

112Strozer, 8, 11, 15, 61Tada, 47, 49Tappe, 11, 273Terzi, 13, 123, 128Thráinsson, 140–43Thráinsson and Vikner, 189,

191Travis, 18, 114, 124, 128, 143,

155Truckenbrodt, 160van Riemsdijk, 97–98, 144, 155,

287Vanden Wyngaerd, 188, 198von Stechow, 12, 287von Stechow and Sternefeld, 12

Warner, 171, 182, 189, 199, 203Watanabe, 131Williams, 236, 243, 246Wurmbrand, 8, 15, 29, 66, 92,

237, 270, 328Yatsushiro, 50, 53Zagona, 8, 11, 15, 343Zanuttini, 115, 116Zubizarreta, 179, 187

auxiliary-infinitive construction,29–31, 37–38

binding, 229–36, 278–80Burzio’s Generalization, 18, 55

Catalan, 184, 343causative construction, 123–24,

215–23control

arbitrary, 237exhaustive, 237, 239, 241–46,

249–51, 253implicit, 230–33, 237, 239, 240,

321, 323long-distance, 237meaning postulates, 248,

254–57, 261obligatory vs. non-obligatory,

241, 245, 246–51, 260partial, 237, 245, 247, 258–60,

277PRO-less approach, 228, 229,

232–33, 235–36, 248–51,254–57

split, 237strict vs. sloppy interpretation,

253–63variable, 237, 241–43, 247, 259,

277, 333control vs. raising, 167–75, 176–82,

208–14. See also modalconstructions

copy theory of movement, 122

Index 369

dative antecedents, 233de se interpretation, 246Doubly Filled Comp filter, 109, 128Dutch

infinitival complementizer,102–4

IPP effect, 102–4, 162, 223,283–85, 341

particle constructions, 97–98remnant extraposition, 102–4,

283–85restructuring classification, 6–7,

223, 283–85, 341–43, 344tense interpretation, 79, 223,

283–85verb raising, 5, 20, 22–25,

97–98, 102–4, 120–21, 125,283–85, 341

easy-to-please construction, 27–29,32, 37–38, 79

event structure, 146–55, 304excorporation, 106, 107, 123, 129extraposition, 40–42, 156–61, 167,

175, 209–10, 212, 224–25,291–96, 308–16. See alsoremnant extraposition

factive infinitives, 80, 286–87,298–307, 317, 323–26

focus scrambling, 40–42, 116–17,222, 270–83, 308–16, 317,327, 337–40

French, 32functional restructuring predicates,

137, 155, 224

Guillotine principle, 5, 121

Head Movement Constraint, 124,128

Icelandic, 189–92

idiomatic wh-infinitives, 107–8implicative infinitives, 79, 153–54,

298–302, 336implicit arguments, 230–33indexical modifier, 65–68, 74, 77infinitival marker, 109–15

and case, 111–12and negation, 114and tense, 112–13distribution, 110, 161, 166, 167,

175intensionality, 75–76intraposition, 39–40, 291–96IPP effect, 162–67, 175, 224–25. See

also Dutch IPP effectirrealis vs. propositional, 62–71,

284, 305–7, 317control vs. raising/ECM, 69–70temporal modification, 65–68,

319–23truth/falsity predication, 64–65,

325Italian

causative construction, 79,123–24

control vs. raising, 191dislocation, 132–35event modification, 148–52infinitival complementizers, 104long object movement, 31–33negation, 129–32restructuring classification, 6–7,

341–43, 345short verb movement, 126verb raising, 121–22wh-specifiers, 105–7

It-anaphors, 253–63

Japaneseaffixal verbs, 89binding, 54–56nominative objects. See stative

construction

370 Index

restructuring classification, 6–7,91, 92–94, 341–43

scope, 49–53stative construction, 33–35,

46–51tense morphology, 85–91,

92–94, 341

Lexical Functional Grammar, 228lexical restructuring predicates, 16,

155, 225, 327lexical/functional distinction, 17,

144, 155–82, 308lexicalism, 20light verbs, 147long passive, 19–27, 31–32, 36, 57,

82, 84, 96, 118, 133, 178,213, 267, 271, 273–81,286–93, 299–300, 308–16,317, 327–32

modal constructionscase of subject, 189–92control vs. raising, 187–204co-occurrence restrictions, 139,

184–87dynamic modals, 158, 171,

182–83, 186–87, 189, 196,201–2, 205

non-directed deonticinterpretation, 203

passive, 196–202scope, 192–96

motion verb construction, 215–23

negation, 115–18, 129–32, 283Null Case, 69, 111, 228

optionality of restructuring, 35–56,179–81, 231, 233–35,289–90, 312–16

perception verb construction, 79,

215–23presupposition generation, 304Projection Principle, 12, 228pronoun fronting, 223, 267–81,

286–87, 289–92, 295,299–300, 306, 308–16, 317,327, 332–37, 345

propositional infinitives, 302–7,323–26. See also irrealis vs.propositional

prosodic restrictions, 160, 294–96PRO-theorem, 228

quirky case, 189–92

raising constructions, 205–15raising vs. control. See control vs.

raisingreanalysis, 12, 125reconstruction, 192–96reduced non-restructuring, 41, 105,

115, 131, 272–96, 308–16,345

relative clause pied piping, 290–91,308–16

remnant extraposition, 102–4. Seealso Dutch remnantextraposition

remnant topicalization, 43–46, 134restructuring approaches

auxiliary, light verb approaches,15, 146–55

bi-clausal approaches, 9, 11–14,57–62, 108, 119

head movement approaches,12–14, 59–60. See also verbraising

mono-clausal approaches, 9,10–11

reduced clausal approaches, 11structure changing approaches,

12topicalization, remnant

Index 371

movement approaches, 14,60–61

restructuring configuration, 4, 94,99–101, 108, 119, 155, 214,275–84, 308–16

scrambling, 40–46, 116–17, 222,270–83, 286–93, 299–300,308–16, 317, 327, 337–40

Spanishlong passive, 31–32negation, 130restructuring classification, 6–7,

341–43wh-specifiers, 105–7

special meaning, 143split IP parameter, 140–43structure pruning principle, 5, 12,

121

tense, infinitival. See also irrealis vs.propositional

deficient, 15, 74–76, 79–85,126–27, 216

irrealis, 62–63, 70–71, 72–78,319–23

past future interpretation, 66–68simultaneity. See deficient tensetemporal modification, 65–68,

73–74, 76–78, 276, 323thematic deficiency, 15, 146–55Theta Criterion, 179, 188Third construction, 103. See also

remnant extraposition

Underspecification, 147

verb classifications, 6–7, 91, 93,245, 271, 318, 326, 327,341–43. See also irrealis vs.propositional

verb projection raising, 22–25, 125verb raising, 5, 14, 118–35. See also

Dutch, Italian verb raisingverbs of saying, 326VP-ellipsis, 114

Wackernagel, 267, 274, 275weather-predicates, 167–72West Flemish, 22, 125West Germanic, 102, 125, 162wh-extraction, 302–5