refugee affairs secretariat -...

4
Key figures Total camp population as of 31 st Dec 2016: 154,947 Total camp population as of 16 th Jan 2017: 156,176 Total Registered refugees, Jan Dec 2016: 36,,992 Reporting months/quarter (Oct Dec 2016: 14,212 Report Prepared & Compiled by: ICTO ,RAS Kakuma: David LOCHAM Email : [email protected] Tel: 0724 -031 377 GOK Registration Update. As of 31st December 2016, Kakuma Refugee camp population stond at 154,947 with 37,813 from Somalia, 84,983 from South Sudan, 9,078 from Sudan, 1,159 from Uganda, 505 from Rwanda, 5,366 from Ethiopia, 55 from Eritrea, 9,753Congo(DRC) , 39 from COB, 6,164 from Burundi and 22 from Tanzania. In the reporting Quarter of 2016 as from 1st October – 31st December; Gok registered a total of 14,212 refugees and asylum seekers: 10,853 from South Sudan, 121 from Sudan , 1,608 from Somalia } ** continuos registration. 17 from Rwanda, 137 from Ethiopia, 482 from Congo(DRC), 841 from Burundi, 148 from Uganda, 4 from Eritrea and 1 from Central African Republic. Cumulatively from 1st January 31 Decemeber 2016 a total of 36,992 refugess / asylum seekers were registered } of which new arrivals account for 26,604 individuals . And as of Today 16th January 2017 the camp population stands at 26,604 accounts for new arrivals for period January December 2016: 22,358 from South Sudan , 1,323 from Burundi, 1,216 from DRC, 1 from Eritrea, 44 from Rwanda, 840 Sudan, 423 from Uganda, 192 from Somalia, 188 from Ethiopia, Congo (BR) 13, Angola 3 , Tanzania 2 and Nigeria 1 January 2017 As of 16 th REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT As of 16 th January 2017, GoK active registered population by country of Origin stands at 152,435 With 99,024 from South Sudan, 21,807 from Somalia, 6,901 from Sudan, 1,315 from Uganda, 447 from Rwanda, 5,787 from Ethiopia, 132 from Eritrea, 9,645 from Congo(DRC), 7,313 from Burundi,24 from the republic of Tanzania and 40 from other nationalities. As of 16 th Jan 2017 the number of new arrivals temporarirly accommodated at the Reception Centre stands at 2,780 (924 families) have successfully been registered with RAS/GOK. Only awaiting UNHCR Registration and onward relocation fro m Kakuma to Kalobeyei settlement. New arrivals from South Sudan The daily numbers is drastically decreasing from 200 individuals to 100 persons . Camp Population By Age Sex Break Down (As of 31 Dec 2016) Sex Total Age Group Male ( %) Female ( %) Total ( %) 0 - 4 12,974 50.9% 12,501 49.1% 25,475 16.4% 5 - 11 20,935 53.1% 18,470 46.9% 36,405 23.4% 12 - 17 18,784 60.1% 12,479 39.9% 31,263 21.2% 18 - 59 29,050 50.9% 28,072 49.1% 57,122 37.9% 60 and above 536 31.9% 1,146 68.1% 1,682 1.1% Total 82,279 53.1% 72,668 46.9% 154,947 100.0%

Upload: nguyendiep

Post on 22-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT - ReliefWebreliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RAS...REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT Cluster strategy and

Key figures

Total camp population as of 31st Dec 2016:

154,947

Total camp population as of 16th Jan 2017:

156,176

Total Registered refugees, Jan –Dec 2016:

36,,992

Reporting months/quarter (Oct –Dec 2016:

14,212

Report

Prepared &

Compiled by:

ICTO ,RAS Kakuma: David LOCHAM

Email : [email protected]

Tel: 0724 -031 377

Context and Response

What dynamic is present in the affected areas? Is i t the same across the affected zone, or are there di fferences?

Summarize the responses from the Government, Community and Other actors to the given situation –

what have been done, strategies, indicators, and their interaction with the cluster.

GOK Registration Update.

As of 31st December 2016, Kakuma Refugee camp population stond at

154,947 with 37,813 from Somalia, 84,983 from South Sudan, 9,078

from Sudan, 1,159 from Uganda, 505 from Rwanda, 5,366 from Ethiopia,

55 from Eritrea, 9,753Congo(DRC) , 39 from COB, 6,164 from Burundi

and 22 from Tanzania.

In the reporting Quarter of 2016 as from 1st October – 31st December;

Gok registered a total of 14,212 refugees and asylum seekers: 10,853

from South Sudan, 121 from Sudan , 1,608 from Somalia } **continuos

registration. 17 from Rwanda, 137 from Ethiopia, 482 from

Congo(DRC), 841 from Burundi, 148 from Uganda, 4 from Eritrea and

1 from Central African Republic.

Cumulatively from 1st January –31 Decemeber 2016 a total of 36,992

refugess/asylum seekers were registered } of which new arrivals

account for 26,604 individuals.

And as of Today 16th January 2017 the camp population stands at

26,604 accounts for new arrivals for period January –December

2016: 22,358 from South Sudan , 1,323 from Burundi, 1,216 from

DRC, 1 from Eritrea, 44 from Rwanda, 840 Sudan, 423 from Uganda,

192 from Somalia, 188 from Ethiopia, Congo (BR) 13, Angola 3 ,

Tanzania 2 and Nigeria 1

Context and Response Recently Kenya is experiencing more recurrent patterns of drought in its ASAL region (North and North-eastern part of the country. Flooding and land sliding have become eminent in Western and south parts of the country. Nevertheless

the devolution and impacts of the above has led to an increase of inter-clan confl ict. Kenya Humanitarian response team has adopted the sector/cluster system to absorb the impacts of the mentions events. The Shelter/NFI sector is recently reestablished as one main sector with IOM and KRCS responsible for i ts operation.

January 2017 As of 16th

REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT

Cluster strategy and objectives

Summary of the cluster strategy and the main goals.

Highlights

The most important information that will be tackled in this factsheet – from 2 to 5 highlights. These are the key points that you want high level people

(Humanitarian Coordinator, donors, Directors…) to know about your cluster. Keep the message clear .

Pictures

Latest pictures of local shelter situation and cluster initiatives. If pictures have logos try to ensure there are different pictures with logos from different cluster

partners not just one of them.

Map 1

Latest version of the map with the overall situation in the country. This should be a map showing the whole country and

ideally the affected areas. This map can be a product of OCHA or others, does not need to be a product of the Shelter Cluster.

As of 16th January 2017, GoK active registered population by country of Origin stands at 152,435

With 99,024 from South Sudan, 21,807 from Somalia, 6,901 from Sudan, 1,315 from Uganda, 447 from Rwanda, 5,787 from Ethiopia, 132 from Eritrea, 9,645 from Congo(DRC), 7,313 from Burundi,24 from the republic of Tanzania and 40 from other nationalities.

As of 16th Jan 2017 the number of new arrivals temporarirly accommodated at the Reception Centre stands at 2,780 (924 families) have successfully been registered with RAS/GOK. Only awaiting UNHCR Registration and onward relocation fro m Kakuma to Kalobeyei settlement.

Challenges

What issues are interfering with the response and/or the activi ties of the cluster (access, security, provision of material, transport, inflation) ?

Are the conditions for effective coordination met (local authorities, participants, communities)?

Do protection concerns impede return? Have people

missed the harvest season and therefore have no

money to build their house?

Contact details

Provide contact information of shelter cluster coordinator. Link to website should appear as hyperlink unless the address is extremely short (i .e. www.shelterhaiti.org). Hyperlinks can be made by selecting the text and typing Ctrl+K

Key Dates

Include the official s tarting date of the crisis, the activation of

the cluster, deployment, handover and GLIDE number, i f

exis ting. If doubts on the crises date, use the date that appears

in the GLIDE numbers. GLIDE numbers can be found here:

http://www.glidenumber.net/glide/public/search/search.jsp

New arrivals from South Sudan

The daily numbers is drastically

decreasing from 200 individuals to

100 persons .

Purpose of the factsheet

This fact sheet is designed by the Global Shelter Cluster in an effort to gather certain basic information from all active Shelter Clusters. This will enable us to do global information management and identify some key overall figures, for instance how many people were on need of shelter worldwide and how many of them were reached. We hope that this information will help give a clearer picture of the shelter situation that will inform key decisions such as the allocation of resources.

We thank you for filling this form as best as possible and to try and follow its structure. When information is not available please indicate with N/A. If you need to expand on one section, feel free to enlarge the text box and reduce the size of other text boxes. Please try to avoid introducing new text boxes or sections or completely removing them.

If you have any comments or feedback please give it to the focal point for the Shelter Cluster in your agency (UNHCR: Miguel Urquia

([email protected]) IFRC: Pablo Medina ([email protected]) IOM: Nuno Nunes ([email protected])) or at the feedback section of sheltercluster.org here.

Challenges - Short time frame due to many consultations with all the participating agencies while

keeping in mind their internal policies. Different agencies, different policies i.e

procurement and response.

- The shelter/NFI sector was establish in lieu to the election period which has passed

smoothly and our challenge is to reform the response framework to suit the above

mentioned possible disaster while putting in mind the new administrative setup

(devolution) coming with county border’s and capacity building issues. Other

challenges which we have felt during election period preparedness was, the lack of the

sector capacities; mainly the limited shelter and NFI kits as well logistical and

operational capacities given the donor fatigue.

-

Camp Population

By Age Sex Break Down

(As of 31 Dec 2016)

Sex Total

Age Group Male ( %) Female ( %) Total ( %)

0 - 4 12,974 50.9% 12,501 49.1% 25,475 16.4%

5 - 11 20,935 53.1% 18,470 46.9% 36,405 23.4%

12 - 17 18,784 60.1% 12,479 39.9% 31,263 21.2%

18 - 59 29,050 50.9% 28,072 49.1% 57,122 37.9%

60 and above 536 31.9% 1,146 68.1% 1,682 1.1%

Total 82,279 53.1% 72,668 46.9% 154,947 100.0%

Page 2: REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT - ReliefWebreliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RAS...REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT Cluster strategy and

Report

Prepared &

Compiled by:

ICTO ,RAS Kakuma: David LOCHAM

Email : [email protected]

Tel: 0724 -031 377

Context and Response

What dynamic is present in the affected areas? Is i t the same across the affected zone, or are there di fferences?

Summarize the responses from the Government, Community and Other actors to the given situation –

what have been done, strategies, indicators, and their interaction with the cluster.

Context and Response Recently Kenya is experiencing more recurrent patterns of drought in its ASAL region (North and North-eastern part of the country. Flooding and land sliding have become eminent in Western and south parts of the country. Nevertheless

the devolution and impacts of the above has led to an increase of inter-clan confl ict. Kenya Humanitarian response team has adopted the sector/cluster system to absorb the impacts of the mentions events. The Shelter/NFI sector is recently reestablished as one main sector with IOM and KRCS responsible for i ts operation.

January 2017 As of 16th

REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT

Cluster strategy and objectives

Summary of the cluster strategy and the main goals.

Highlights

The most important information that will be tackled in this factsheet – from 2 to 5 highlights. These are the key points that you want high level people

(Humanitarian Coordinator, donors, Directors…) to know about your cluster. Keep the message clear .

Pictures

Latest pictures of local shelter situation and cluster initiatives. If pictures have logos try to ensure there are different pictures with logos from different cluster

partners not just one of them.

Map 1

Latest version of the map with the overall situation in the country. This should be a map showing the whole country and

ideally the affected areas. This map can be a product of OCHA or others, does not need to be a product of the Shelter Cluster.

Challenges

What issues are interfering with the response and/or the activi ties of the cluster (access, security, provision of material, transport, inflation) ?

Are the conditions for effective coordination met (local authorities, participants, communities)?

Do protection concerns impede return? Have people

missed the harvest season and therefore have no

money to build their house?

Contact details

Provide contact information of shelter cluster coordinator. Link to website should appear as hyperlink unless the address is extremely short (i .e. www.shelterhaiti.org). Hyperlinks can be made by selecting the text and typing Ctrl+K

Key Dates

Include the official s tarting date of the crisis, the activation of

the cluster, deployment, handover and GLIDE number, i f

exis ting. If doubts on the crises date, use the date that appears

in the GLIDE numbers. GLIDE numbers can be found here:

http://www.glidenumber.net/glide/public/search/search.jsp

Update

Please update the Factsheet as often as you feel i s needed. Probably at the beginning of the response updates will be needed on a weekly or bi -weekly basis while later they might be on a monthly or even bi-monthly basis. As a minimum i t should be updated every 3 months.

Purpose of the factsheet

This fact sheet is designed by the Global Shelter Cluster in an effort to gather certain basic information from all active Shelter Clusters. This will enable us to do global information management and identify some key overall figures, for instance how many people were on need of shelter worldwide and how many of them were reached. We hope that this information will help give a clearer picture of the shelter situation that will inform key decisions such as the allocation of resources.

We thank you for filling this form as best as possible and to try and follow its structure. When information is not available please indicate with N/A. If you need to expand on one section, feel free to enlarge the text box and reduce the size of other text boxes. Please try to avoid introducing new text boxes or sections or completely removing them.

If you have any comments or feedback please give it to the focal point for the Shelter Cluster in your agency (UNHCR: Miguel Urquia

([email protected]) IFRC: Pablo Medina ([email protected]) IOM: Nuno Nunes ([email protected])) or at the feedback section of sheltercluster.org here.

Challenges - Short time frame due to many consultations with all the participating agencies while

keeping in mind their internal policies. Different agencies, different policies i.e

procurement and response.

- The shelter/NFI sector was establish in lieu to the election period which has passed

smoothly and our challenge is to reform the response framework to suit the above

mentioned possible disaster while putting in mind the new administrative setup

(devolution) coming with county border’s and capacity building issues. Other

challenges which we have felt during election period preparedness was, the lack of the

sector capacities; mainly the limited shelter and NFI kits as well logistical and

operational capacities given the donor fatigue.

-

Population Of Concern To GOK By Their Country Of Origin

As of 31st December 2016

COO Individuals Percetage

Somalia 37,813 24.40%

South Sudan 84,983 54.85%

Sudan 9,078 5.86%

Ethiopia 5,366 3.46%

Dem. Rep. Congo 9,753 6.29%

Burundi 6,164 3.98%

Congo (Brazaville) 39 0.03%

Rwanda 505 0.33%

Uganda 1,159 0.75%

Eritrea 55 0.03%

Tanzania 22 0.01%

Others 10 0.01%

Total 154,947 100.00%

Others include: Angola, Zimbabwe,Bukinafaso, etc…

12,974

20,935 18,784

29,050

536

12,501 18,470 12,479

28,072

1,146 0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

0 - 4 5 - 11 12 - 17 18 - 59 60 and above

Male

Figure 1 - Kakuma Camp Demographic Breakdown * Age sex breakdown -CHART

Page 3: REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT - ReliefWebreliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RAS...REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT Cluster strategy and

Needs, response and gap

Indicators with needs, response and gaps in terms of HH and projects funding.

Fill the table with all the information, if possible.

Please ensure that you fill all the parts of the response even if the lines were

done in the past. Even if the emergency response finished 3 months ago it

should still be captured so that the Factsheet gives an overall idea of the whole

response. In the case of Cote d’Ivoire this information was not available, that is

why it was left emptz.

NFIs include mats, kitchen sets, clothes, stoves, blankets…

Emergency shelter includes tents, plastic sheeting for shelter, shelter ki ts that

address emergency needs, cash for emergency shelter needs.

Long-term shelter includes transitional shelter support such as cash assistance for

longer term needs (rental support, repair), materials to build sheds, distribution of

sheds, support to build permanent houses in whatever form: cash, materials,

contractors…

Column A includes the latest figure on number of a ffected households.

Column B i s the number of HH who have self-recovered. It can be an estimation if

no hard data are available. At the beginning of an emergency this column might

not be so relevant and thus can be deleted.

Column C i s the result of A-B. At the beginning of an emergency this column might

not be so relevant and thus can be deleted.

Column D i s an estimation of how many of the households s till a ffected actually

need support. This depends on the resilience of the population, in the case of

Cote d’ Ivoi re this was estimated in 50% in other cases it can be 20% , 30%.... Very

often the cluster will target all these households, this is the case in Cote d’ Ivoire.

Column E captures how many HH are being assisted by the Government. This

column can be renamed “#HH assisted by the Government and other actors” i f

there are many other actors national (private companies…) or actors who do not

want to be considered part of the cluster l ike ICRC.

Column F captures the number of HH targeted by humanitarian actors and with

confi rmed funding .

Column G shows the number of HH served to date by the cluster, those that have

actually received the assistance. This column should capture support a lready

dis tributed, not i f they are in the warehouse ready for distribution.

Column H captures the gap. Depending on the advocacy needs of the cluster i t can

be ca lled # HH not yet served (F-G) or # HH not yet funded (D-E-F). If needed, a

new column can be added to capture both gaps.

Specify the budget gaps in terms of NFIs, Emergency Shelter and Long-term

shelter, in US$

Map 2

Map with the latest information of who is doing

what where (3W). Use the latest map. Make sure the

image stays within the grey line.

The 3W is an extremely useful tool for coordination

thus cluster coordinators are encouraged to produce

this map as soon as possible. However, if you have

not been able to produce this map yet, you can put

in the meantime some other map, table, diagram or

text that you think explains the situation. Please

change the title accordingly and try to produce the

3W map as soon as possible.

Logos

Logos of all the organizations part of the cluster.

The logos must be in alphabetical order.

Hyperlink to the map section of your website

Please make sure to update this hyperlink to the

map section of your website. Hyperlinks can be

modified by selecting them and typing Ctrl+K

Shelter solutions

Use the agreed categories (house, tent, shed,

col lective centers, improved shelter, no shelter).

Please note that shed refers to a transitional shelter

solution that can evolve into a house. As this i s a very

common transitional shelter solution, it is often

mistakenly ca lled transitional shelter.

Report

Prepared &

Compiled by:

ICTO ,RAS Kakuma: David LOCHAM

Email : [email protected]

Tel: 0724 -031 377

FM

FM

FM

FM

FM

FM

ANG

-

-

01

-

-

1

1

-

-

2

1

3

BDI

562

599

658647

379

382

1,232

1,720

41

21

2,872

3,369

6,241

BKF-

-

0

0-

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

1

CAR

-

-

00

-

-

-

2

-

-

-

2

2

COB

6

2

43

6

2

6

13

-

-

22

20

42

COD

933

925

1,1091,066

670

784

1,848

2,411

39

12

4,599

5,198

9,797

ERT

1

2

33

1

2

12

29

1

1

18

37

55

ETH448

461

433

472347

393

1,142

1,645

25

24

2,395

2,995

5,390

GUI-

-

0

00

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

1

SUD300

379

584

850650

1,348

1,326

3,716

20

8

2,880

6,301

9,181

RW

A29

44

61

4626

35

131

132

2

2

249

259

508

SAU

-

-

10

-

-

1

-

-

-

2

-

2

SOM

3,161

3,207

3,919

4,0793,070

3,403

8,435

7,977

343

290

18,928

18,956

37,884

SSD

5,989

6,206

10,87612,563

7,757

12,156

15,221

14,105

735

231

40,578

45,261

85,839

OTH

ERS

80

82

125104

88

127

274

335

3

12

570

660

1,230

Total

11,509

11,907

17,773

19,834

12,994

18,632

29,629

32,088

1,209

601

73,114

83,062

156,176

%7.4%

7.6%11.4%

12.7%8.3%

11.9%19.0%

20.5%0.8%

0.4%46.82%

53.18%

As of 16th January 2017

Sub TotalCountry of O

rigin0-4

12-1718-59

Total

Age Breakdow

n

60+5-11

40,578

45,261

45,000 50,000

Page 4: REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT - ReliefWebreliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RAS...REFUGEE AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT Kakuma Refugee Camp, Statistics REPORT Cluster strategy and

Needs, response and gap

Indicators with needs, response and gaps in terms of HH and projects funding.

Fill the table with all the information, if possible.

Please ensure that you fill all the parts of the response even if the lines were

done in the past. Even if the emergency response finished 3 months ago it

should still be captured so that the Factsheet gives an overall idea of the whole

response. In the case of Cote d’Ivoire this information was not available, that is

why it was left emptz.

NFIs include mats, kitchen sets, clothes, stoves, blankets…

Emergency shelter includes tents, plastic sheeting for shelter, shelter ki ts that

address emergency needs, cash for emergency shelter needs.

Long-term shelter includes transitional shelter support such as cash assistance for

longer term needs (rental support, repair), materials to build sheds, distribution of

sheds, support to build permanent houses in whatever form: cash, materials,

contractors…

Column A includes the latest figure on number of a ffected households.

Column B i s the number of HH who have self-recovered. It can be an estimation if

no hard data are available. At the beginning of an emergency this column might

not be so relevant and thus can be deleted.

Column C i s the result of A-B. At the beginning of an emergency this column might

not be so relevant and thus can be deleted.

Column D i s an estimation of how many of the households s till a ffected actually

need support. This depends on the resilience of the population, in the case of

Cote d’ Ivoi re this was estimated in 50% in other cases it can be 20% , 30%.... Very

often the cluster will target all these households, this is the case in Cote d’ Ivoire.

Column E captures how many HH are being assisted by the Government. This

column can be renamed “#HH assisted by the Government and other actors” i f

there are many other actors national (private companies…) or actors who do not

want to be considered part of the cluster l ike ICRC.

Column F captures the number of HH targeted by humanitarian actors and with

confi rmed funding .

Column G shows the number of HH served to date by the cluster, those that have

actually received the assistance. This column should capture support a lready

dis tributed, not i f they are in the warehouse ready for distribution.

Column H captures the gap. Depending on the advocacy needs of the cluster i t can

be ca lled # HH not yet served (F-G) or # HH not yet funded (D-E-F). If needed, a

new column can be added to capture both gaps.

Specify the budget gaps in terms of NFIs, Emergency Shelter and Long-term

shelter, in US$

Map 2

Map with the latest information of who is doing

what where (3W). Use the latest map. Make sure the

image stays within the grey line.

The 3W is an extremely useful tool for coordination

thus cluster coordinators are encouraged to produce

this map as soon as possible. However, if you have

not been able to produce this map yet, you can put

in the meantime some other map, table, diagram or

text that you think explains the situation. Please

change the title accordingly and try to produce the

3W map as soon as possible.

Logos

Logos of all the organizations part of the cluster.

The logos must be in alphabetical order.

Hyperlink to the map section of your website

Please make sure to update this hyperlink to the

map section of your website. Hyperlinks can be

modified by selecting them and typing Ctrl+K

Shelter solutions

Use the agreed categories (house, tent, shed,

col lective centers, improved shelter, no shelter).

Please note that shed refers to a transitional shelter

solution that can evolve into a house. As this i s a very

common transitional shelter solution, it is often

mistakenly ca lled transitional shelter.

Report

Prepared &

Compiled by:

ICTO ,RAS Kakuma: David LOCHAM

Email : [email protected]

Tel: 0724 -031 377