region 10 accountability and assessment updates march 07, 2014 jana schreiner, accountability and...
TRANSCRIPT
Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates
March 07, 2014Jana Schreiner, Accountability and
State Assessment Consultant
Agenda, Webinar #7
• Double Testing• Accountability
– Federal • Priority/Focus/Reward• 1003(a) grant• Federal Report Card
– State • Final decisions in March• DVM
• Assessment– Questions from the field
DOUBLE TESTING
Two letters…
• Press release• TAA letter• To Administrator Addressed letter gives more
information….
Bottom line…
• No incentive to double test• Commissioner discourages double testing• Algebra I score will count at campus where
student tests• No plans to count as non-participants
Lingering Question
• SSI?
FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY
SIP
Title I, 1003(a) Priority and Focus School Grant • Application
– Scheduled to open in eGrants on 2-13-14– Closing date in eGrants 3-17-14– Amendment deadline 6-16-14– Grant ends on 9-30-14
• Allocations– Non-TTIPS Priority Schools $160,000– Focus Schools $20,000
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
8
NCLB Report Card
• Renamed• Different timeline this year
Questions?
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY
2014 Developmenthttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/materials.html
• ATAC preliminary recommendations—with targets…this posted 02/28/14
• Final decisions in March… the “end” of March
Performance Based Monitoring
Data Validation Monitoring
Staging for DVM-Leavers was posted in ISAM on Friday, January 31, 2014.
Staging for DVM-Discipline will be posted during the week of February 20th.
DVM-State Assessment reports were released to districts on February 21st. Staging is coming.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
13
• Districts at stage 3 or 4 will submit all interventions activities and documents, including supporting documentation and the improvement/corrective action plan, to TEA on or before April 9, 2014.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
14
DVM-Leavers and Discipline
Performance Based Monitoring
Important to Remember
Key difference between
DVM And PBM
PBMAS indicators yield a definitive result.
DVM suggests an anomaly that needs to be reviewed to determine whether the anomalous data are accurate--- raising a red flag
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
15
DVM-Student Assessment
• Student assessment data validation indicators have been implemented annually since 2005 (except for 2011).
• The 2013 student assessment data validation indicators are very similar to previous years’ indicators, with some minor changes.– A new indicator has been added
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
16
DVM-Student Assessment
• STAAR 3-8 Absent and “Other”– These are accountability system safeguard
indicators that are aligned with the student groups included in the state accountability system’s student performance results.
– They evaluate all subject areas.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
17
ASSESSMENT
Q: Are online TELPAS Reading rosters considered confidential & secure materials before or after proctor caching? (It lists PEIMS numbers and user id before proctor caching & adds authorization codes after). A: Yes to both.
Q: If a student’s years in schools was reported incorrectly last year, can we make a correction? This is not a recalculation based on 60 day rule, but a clerical error that that we’d like to resolve.A: Per TEA, you cannot correct last year, but enter the correct years this year and keep local documentation.
Q: A student eligible for special provisions has retested twice in English 1 EOC’s. However, the student has not earned credit for the 1st half of English 1 yet. Should the student retest in English 1 EOC once credit for the class has been earned (during fall 2014)?A: Since part of the provision is passing the class, the student would retest in the fall, after which (assuming credit is earned) he/she can take advantage of the provision and no longer retest.
Q: Where can we find the percentage of passing for new EOC English tests at Level 2 satisfactory (phase-in 1)?A: It is not yet postedQ: Are the compositions being graded by 2 scorers? If so, how are they arriving at the 1-4 score for students?A: Yes, two scorers. See next slides.
STAAR Writing Rubric
Score Point 1—VERY LIMITED
Score Point 2—BASIC
Score Point 3—SATISFACTORY
Score Point 4—ACCOMPLISHED
Teachers and students need to have anin-depth understanding of the writing rubric for each type of writing!
21
Scoring Model for STAAR
22
SCORE 1 SCORE 2
SUMMED
SCORE CSR RATING
0 0 0 Nonscorable Performance1 1 2 Very Limited Performance1 2 3 Between Very Limited and Basic Performance2 2 4 Basic Performance2 3 5 Between Basic and Satisfactory Performance3 3 6 Satisfactory Performance3 4 7 Between Satisfactory and Accomplished Performance4 4 8 Accomplished Performance