region 11 january 2012 - in.gov filedepartment of child services practice indicator reports...

25
Department of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2019

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

Department of Child Services

Practice Indicator Reports

Published

For January 2012

January 2012

February 2012

Region 11

Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

Page 2: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected over a rolling three month period ending with the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use a rolling three month period ending with the historical month listed. Reports Taken – This section has data regarding the reports taken during the three month period ending with the report month.

Count – This is the total number of reports of abuse or neglect that are entered into ICWIS during the period ending with the report month.

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs – This is the percentage of reports that are screened out divided by the total reports taken during the period ending with the report month.

Assessments Substantiated – This section has data regarding the number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the three month period ending with the report month.

Count – This is the total number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the period ending with the report month.

Percent Resulting in Removal – This is the percentage of substantiated assessments during the period that resulted in removal of the child from the home by the end of the report month divided by the total number of substantiated assessments during the period ending with the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

For January 2012

Report Description

February 08 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

2

Page 3: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

1,807 39.40% 192 17.19%

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

Location Reports Taken

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs

For Nov 2011 to Jan 2012

Percent Resulting in Removal

CountCount

Assessments Substantiated

For Nov 2011 to Jan 2012

Statewide 35,974 37.0% 5,240 27.4%

Region 11

For January 2012

January 2012 Statewide Percent Removal Trend

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

30.8 30.830.4 30.6

30.3

28.9

27.226.9

27.6

28.729.0

28.1

27.4

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Percent Removal

Region 11 Percent Removal

Month Reports Taken

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs

For Nov 2011 to Jan 2012

Percent Resulting in Removal

CountCount

Assessments Substantiated

For Nov 2011 to Jan 2012 21.6

23.5

19.4 19.818.2

19.7

16.6

22.5

27.1 28.4

22.4

14.917.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Percent Removal

Hamilton 639 41.3% 43 20.9%

Hancock 268 43.3% 33 6.1%

Madison 840 36.7% 109 17.4%

Tipton 60 40.0% 7 42.9%

Jan 2012 1,807 39.4% 192 17.2%

Dec 2011 1,710 39.1% 188 14.9%

Nov 2011 1,813 37.8% 196 22.4%

Oct 2011 1,890 38.0% 243 28.4%

Sep 2011 1,863 37.3% 262 27.1%

Aug 2011 1,798 37.4% 253 22.5%

Jul 2011 1,813 37.4% 247 16.6%

Jun 2011 1,926 38.6% 234 19.7%

May 2011 2,073 39.9% 220 18.2%

Apr 2011 1,879 41.4% 212 19.8%

Mar 2011 1,781 40.1% 242 19.4%

Feb 2011 1,543 37.8% 268 23.5%

Jan 2011 1,727 36.9% 273 21.6%

February 08 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 3

Page 4: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, a child with a non-custodial parent is considered “in home”. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. CHINS – This section has data regarding all children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

Foster Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

Out of Home Placements – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement.

Relative Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Foster Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Residential – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Other – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Example would be a court ordered unlicensed placement.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator Report

CHINS Placements by County

For January 2012

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 4

Page 5: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2012

CHINS Placements by County

Location Total CHINS

Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other

Count % Count %Count % Count %

Region 11 427 199109 95 14 10318 29.9 62.6 4.4 3.1

Statewide 12494 44093754 3453 673 2058,740 39.5 50.4 7.7 2.3

Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

Region 11 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

01-'1

1

02-'1

1

03-'1

1

04-'1

1

05-'1

1

06-'1

1

07-'1

1

08-'1

1

09-'1

1

10-'1

1

11-'1

1

12-'1

1

01-'1

2

Relative Foster Home Residential Other

Foster Care

Out of Home Placements

%

25.5

30.0

%

74.5

70.0

Count Count Count

CHINS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

01-'1

1

02-'1

1

03-'1

1

04-'1

1

05-'1

1

06-'1

1

07-'1

1

08-'1

1

09-'1

1

10-'1

1

11-'1

1

12-'1

1

01-'1

2

Relative Foster Home Residential Other

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

Month Total CHINS

Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other

Count % Count %Count % Count %

Foster Care

Out of Home Placements

% %Count Count Count

CHINS

Hamilton 84 4320 18 2 123.8 28.1 67.2 3.1 1.664 76.2

Hancock 41 2312 4 0 229.3 13.8 79.3 0.0 6.929 70.7

Madison 284 12673 66 12 725.7 31.3 59.7 5.7 3.3211 74.3

Tipton 18 74 7 0 022.2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.014 77.8

Jan 2012 427 199109 95 14 1025.5 29.9 62.6 4.4 3.1318 74.5

Dec 2011 432 192116 99 15 1026.9 31.3 60.8 4.7 3.2316 73.1

Nov 2011 441 206114 100 17 425.9 30.6 63.0 5.2 1.2327 74.1

Oct 2011 449 199120 104 19 726.7 31.6 60.5 5.8 2.1329 73.3

Sep 2011 485 205148 105 21 630.5 31.2 60.8 6.2 1.8337 69.5

Aug 2011 476 209128 112 21 626.9 32.2 60.1 6.0 1.7348 73.1

Jul 2011 502 210138 126 23 527.5 34.6 57.7 6.3 1.4364 72.5

Jun 2011 499 223117 124 26 923.4 32.5 58.4 6.8 2.4382 76.6

May 2011 515 218131 130 30 625.4 33.9 56.8 7.8 1.6384 74.6

Apr 2011 507 212120 137 32 623.7 35.4 54.8 8.3 1.6387 76.3

Mar 2011 512 204131 135 34 825.6 35.4 53.5 8.9 2.1381 74.4

Feb 2011 530 207143 137 37 627.0 35.4 53.5 9.6 1.6387 73.0

Jan 2011 547 193166 142 41 530.3 37.3 50.7 10.8 1.3381 69.7

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 5

Page 6: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, children with non-custodial parents are considered to be in

their own home. IA Count – This is the number of children that have an open Informal Adjustment case on the last day of the report month. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. IA and In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home.

Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month.

IA, In Home or Relative Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.

Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or Above) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

Non Relative Foster Care – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.

Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or below) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Safely Home Families First by County

January 2012

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 6

Page 7: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

Region 11 427 286 223

Statewide 12494 8970 5,287

Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

Region 11 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

01-'1

1

02-'1

1

03-'1

1

04-'1

1

05-'1

1

06-'1

1

07-'1

1

08-'1

1

09-'1

1

10-'1

1

11-'1

1

12-'1

1

01-'1

2

In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

56.2%

62.9%

43.8%

37.1%

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2012

Safely Home Families First by County

50%

50%

50%

50%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

01-'1

1

02-'1

1

03-'1

1

04-'1

1

05-'1

1

06-'1

1

07-'1

1

08-'1

1

09-'1

1

10-'1

1

11-'1

1

12-'1

1

01-'1

2

In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

82

1763

Location Total CHINS

Non-Relative Foster Care

% %Count Count Count

IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care

Target (At or

Above) %

Target (At or Below)

%

IA

Count %Count

IA and In Home CHINS

191

5517

37.5%

38.7%

Location Total CHINS

Non-Relative Foster Care

% %Count Count Count

IA, In Home CHINS, and Relative Care

Target (At or

Above) %

Target (At or Below)

%

IA

Count %Count

IA and In Home CHINS

Hamilton 84 41 4647.1% 50%50% 52.9%3 23 26.4%

Hancock 41 36 2559.0% 50%50% 41.0%20 32 52.5%

Madison 284 192 14557.0% 50%50% 43.0%53 126 37.4%

Tipton 18 17 770.8% 50%50% 29.2%6 10 41.7%

January 2012 427 286 22356.2% 50%50% 43.8%82 191 37.5%

December 2011 432 284 21756.7% 50%50% 43.3%69 185 36.9%

November 2011 441 292 22756.3% 50%50% 43.7%78 192 37.0%

October 2011 449 299 22557.1% 50%50% 42.9%75 195 37.2%

September 201 485 327 23258.5% 50%50% 41.5%74 222 39.7%

August 2011 476 323 23657.8% 50%50% 42.2%83 211 37.7%

July 2011 502 342 23859.0% 50%50% 41.0%78 216 37.2%

June 2011 499 321 25855.4% 50%50% 44.6%80 197 34.0%

May 2011 515 339 25457.2% 50%50% 42.8%78 209 35.2%

April 2011 507 332 25057.0% 50%50% 43.0%75 195 33.5%

March 2011 512 345 24658.4% 50%50% 41.6%79 210 35.5%

February 2011 530 364 25059.3% 50%50% 40.7%84 227 37.0%

January 2011 547 394 23962.2% 50%50% 37.8%86 252 39.8%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 7

Page 8: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with their non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total Out of Home Placements – This is the total number of CHINS children that are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. Placed in Same County – This is the total number of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case. Percent Locally Placed – This is the percentage of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case divided by the total number of CHINS children which are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Locally Placed CHINS

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

8

Page 9: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

Locally Placed CHINS

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2012

318 167 52.5%

Location Total Out of Home

Placements

Placed in Same County

Percent Locally Placed

Statewide 8,740 6,184 70.8%

Region 11

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

71.0

71.5

71.1 71.1

71.3 71.2

70.7

70.9

70.6 70.670.7

70.7 70.8

70

70.2

70.4

70.6

70.8

71

71.2

71.4

71.6

Jan

'11

Feb '1

1M

ar '1

1A

pr '1

1M

ay '1

1Ju

n '11

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Statewide Percent Placed Locally

Region 11 Percent Placed Locally

53.3

56.655.9

57.1

55.7

53.7

51.150.6 50.7 50.8

52.6

51.6

52.5

46

48

50

52

54

56

58Ja

n '1

1Feb

'11

Mar

'11

Apr

'11

May

'11

Jun '1

1

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Month Total Out of Home

Placements

Placed in Same County

Percent Locally Placed

64 38 59.4%Hamilton

29 14 48.3%Hancock

211 109 51.7%Madison

14 6 42.9%Tipton

318 167 52.5%Jan 2012

316 163 51.6%Dec 2011

327 172 52.6%Nov 2011

329 167 50.8%Oct 2011

337 171 50.7%Sep 2011

348 176 50.6%Aug 2011

364 186 51.1%Jul 2011

382 205 53.7%Jun 2011

384 214 55.7%May 2011

387 221 57.1%Apr 2011

381 213 55.9%Mar 2011

387 219 56.6%Feb 2011

381 203 53.3%Jan 2011

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 9

Page 10: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. Average Number of Placements Per Child – This is the total number of out of home placements for each CHINS child in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. This includes all placements during the current removal episode. If a child had at least one placement end in the first 8 days from removal, then that child's number of placements was reduced by one. This number is divided by the total number CHINS children who are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Average Number of Placements

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 10

Page 11: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

Location Average Number of

Placements Per Child

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2011 to January 2012

Average Number of Placements

Statewide Average Number of Placements

2.49

2.5

2.51

2.52

2.53

2.54

2.55

2.56

2.57

2.58

2.59

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Average Placements

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012 Region 11 Average Number of Placements

2.5

Statewide 2.6

Region 11

Month Average Number of Placements Per

Child

2.05

2.1

2.15

2.2

2.25

2.3

2.35

2.4

2.45

2.5

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Average Placements

2.0Hamilton

2.9Hancock

2.6Madison

1.7Tipton

2.5January 2012

2.5December 2011

2.4November 2011

2.5October 2011

2.4September 2011

2.4August 2011

2.3July 2011

2.3June 2011

2.3May 2011

2.3April 2011

2.3March 2011

2.3February 2011

2.2January 2011

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 11

Page 12: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with a non-custodial parent are considered to be in their own home. Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children are placed in the same resource with the same resource ID. Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placed together divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month. Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in out of home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Sibling Placement Report

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

12

Page 13: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

Location Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Average Number of Children per

Case

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

81 67 2.6582.7%

Statewide 2149 1595 2.7174.2%

Region 1170.7

71.671.9 71.9 71.9

72.7

73.6 73.7 73.673.2

74.1 74.6 74.2

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Percent Together

Statewide Percent Together

Region 11 Percent Together

DCS Practice Indicator Report

January 2012

Sibling Placement Report

75.076.0

76.876.0

76.8

80.8 80.6 80.7 81.2 81.2

82.481.7

82.7

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Percent Together

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Average Number of Children per

Case

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Hamilton 17 14 2.6582.4%

Hancock 7 7 3.00100.0%

Madison 53 42 2.6479.2%

Tipton 4 4 2.25100.0%

January 2012 81 67 2.6582.7%

December 2011 82 67 2.6581.7%

November 2011 85 70 2.5982.4%

October 2011 85 69 2.6081.2%

September 2011 85 69 2.6081.2%

August 2011 88 71 2.5980.7%

July 2011 93 75 2.6280.6%

June 2011 99 80 2.6180.8%

May 2011 99 76 2.6176.8%

April 2011 100 76 2.5976.0%

March 2011 99 76 2.5576.8%

February 2011 100 76 2.5576.0%

January 2011 96 72 2.5175.0%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 13

Page 14: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children that were in out of home placement at the end of the month. It measures the number of days since the child was last removed from its home. One Year - 0 to 365 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 366 to 730 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 731 to 1095 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 1096 Days+– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Length Per Child – This column shows data for length of time of CHINS children who were in out of home placement at the end of the report month have been in out of home placement since the child’s last removal from their home.

Average- This column calculates the average or “mean” length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Median- This column calculates the median length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal

For January 2012

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

14

Page 15: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

116 103 49 5036.5% 32.4% 15.4% 15.7% 653.5

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal

Location One Year0 to 365 Days

Two Years366 to 730 Days

Three Years731 to 1095 Days

Three + Years1096 Days+

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

For January 2012

Average Median

Length Per Child

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

Statewide Median Length

Region 11 Median Length

4,162 2,065 1,098 1,41547.6% 23.6% 12.6% 16.2% 631.8Statewide 393.0

Region 11 517.5398

402 402

409414 415

424 426 425429 428

417

393

370

380

390

400

410

420

430

440

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Median

390 398421 441 452 436 450 461 476

507 512 527 518

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Median

Month One Year0 to 365 Days

Two Years366 to 730 Days

Three Years731 to 1095 Days

Three + Years1096 Days+

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Average Median

Length Per Child

32 23 3 650.0% 35.9% 4.7% 9.4% 547.8Hamilton 364.0

3 16 8 210.3% 55.2% 27.6% 6.9% 655.9Hancock 642.4

75 57 37 4235.5% 27.0% 17.5% 19.9% 706.8Madison 585.5

6 7 1 042.9% 50.0% 7.1% 0.0% 329.5Tipton 383.0

116 103 49 5036.5% 32.4% 15.4% 15.7% 653.5January 2012 517.5

115 100 48 5336.4% 31.6% 15.2% 16.8% 656.2December 2011 527.0

119 100 54 5436.4% 30.6% 16.5% 16.5% 644.0November 2011 511.5

122 102 55 5037.1% 31.0% 16.7% 15.2% 646.8October 2011 507.4

133 95 59 5039.5% 28.2% 17.5% 14.8% 626.1September 2011 476.4

133 105 56 5438.2% 30.2% 16.1% 15.5% 630.0August 2011 461.0

145 103 64 5239.8% 28.3% 17.6% 14.3% 627.7July 2011 449.5

150 117 62 5339.3% 30.6% 16.2% 13.9% 616.9June 2011 436.0

155 113 60 5640.4% 29.4% 15.6% 14.6% 633.0May 2011 452.0

157 122 51 5740.6% 31.5% 13.2% 14.7% 624.8April 2011 440.6

163 114 48 5642.8% 29.9% 12.6% 14.7% 615.7March 2011 421.4

177 107 48 5545.7% 27.6% 12.4% 14.2% 587.9February 2011 397.6

185 96 44 5648.6% 25.2% 11.5% 14.7% 581.0January 2011 389.6

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 15

Page 16: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses CHINS and IA case types that have case type status end date occurring during the month. It then groups these cases using the closure reasons codes into categories of closure reasons. Case with closure reason code “Case opened in error – disregard” are filtered out for the purpose of this report. This report uses the reason codes selected by the worker at the date of case closure. Adoption closure reasons will not match the number of actual finalized adoptions reported from the hearing information fields in ICWIS/MaGik. Closure Reasons are group by:

Description Category Description Category

Child Reunited with Parents Reunification Case closed; AG case created Guardianship

Child never Removed from own home, wardship terminated

Reunification Child placed with relatives Relative

Extended wardship terminated (on court order for age 18 to 21)

Emancipation Child Placed with Legal guardian Guardianship

Child Returned to Primary Home Reunification Child Reached Age of Majority (age 18) Emancipation

Period of IA ended code used for Informal Adjustment cases only

Reunification Emancipated Court Ordered (age 18) Emancipation

Child Adoption Finalized Adoption Child Already Reunited with parent (s) when wardship terminated

Reunification

The Permanency column “Total” refers to the total case with reason codes in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories. The Permanency column “Total within 24 months” refers to the total case that ended within 24 month of the case status type begin date in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

CHINS and IA Permanency Report

For January 2012

Report Description

February 06 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

16

Page 17: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

DCS Practice Indicator Report

CHINS and IA Permanency Report

For January 2012

Statewide Permanency within 24 Months

Region 11 Permanency within 24 Months

Statewide

Region 11

86.1 88.4 87.0 85.5 83.7 85.1 85.1 82.880.0 82.1 81.7

68.4

82.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

653 120 14 63 32

10 2 1 0 0

Location

Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship Emanicipation

882

13

Total

Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes

82.9

84.6

24 Month Rate

731

11

Within 24 Months

Permanency

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

Location

Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship EmanicipationTotal

Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes

24 Month Rate

Within 24 Months

Permanency

92.196.0 93.3

88.5

80.8 81.586.2

79.1

65.6

75.0

84.6

63.6

84.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Hamilton 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.02

Hancock 0 0 1 0 0 1 100.01

Madison 7 0 0 0 0 7 100.07

Tipton 1 2 0 0 0 3 33.31

Jan 2012 10 2 1 0 0 13 84.611

Dec 2011 23 8 1 1 0 33 63.621

Nov 2011 17 6 0 2 1 26 84.622

Oct 2011 26 6 0 0 0 32 75.024

Sep 2011 20 10 0 2 0 32 65.621

Aug 2011 27 6 0 8 2 43 79.134

Jul 2011 22 3 0 4 0 29 86.225

Jun 2011 23 2 1 0 1 27 81.522

May 2011 18 5 0 1 2 26 80.821

Apr 2011 22 4 0 0 0 26 88.523

Mar 2011 22 2 0 4 2 30 93.328

Feb 2011 24 0 0 1 0 25 96.024

Jan 2011 33 1 0 4 0 38 92.135

February 06 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 17

Page 18: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

• Father

• Mother

• Stepfather

• Stepmother

• Grandfather

• Grandmother

• Pre-adoptive father

• Pre-adoptive mother

• Adoptive grandparent

• Legal Guardian Children Out of Home Entire Month – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have a removal date prior to the first of the report month. Contact Information – This section of the reports shows information regarding FCM contacts (from the contact screens) during the report month. FCM with Family – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

FCM with Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with the child divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

FCM with Family and Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) AND the child during the report month. Contact with both had to have occurred for the child to be included in this section. The family and child do not need to present at the same contact, contact with each could have been made in two separate contacts.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Family Case Manager Contacts Report

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

18

Page 19: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2012

Family Case Manager Contacts Report

Location

Children

Statewide Child Contact Rate

Region 11 Child Contact Rate

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

305 92 30.2%

Statewide

Region 11

98.1

92.6

99.7

97.197.8

99.5

96.0

98.5

96.7

98.2

95.696.4

97.4

88.0

90.0

92.0

94.0

96.0

98.0

100.0

102.0

Jan

'11

Feb '1

1M

ar '1

1A

pr '1

1M

ay '1

1Ju

n '11

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Child Contact

Contact Information

FCM with Family

Rate Children

FCM with Child

Rate Children

FCM with Family and Child

Rate

Children out

of home entire month

88 28.9%297 97.4%

8,351 2,540 30.4% 2,477 29.7%8,113 97.2%

Month

Children

Contact Information

FCM with Family

Rate Children

FCM with Child

Rate Children

FCM with Family and Child

Rate

Children out of home entire

month

97.597.3

98.1

97.2

96.9

98.2

96.7

97.8

97.4

97.196.9

97.097.2

96.0

96.5

97.0

97.5

98.0

98.5

Jan

'11

Feb '1

1M

ar '1

1A

pr '1

1M

ay '1

1Ju

n '11

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Child Contact

63 24 38.1%Hamilton 21 33.3%60 95.2%

27 12 44.4%Hancock 12 44.4%26 96.3%

203 50 24.6%Madison 49 24.1%199 98.0%

12 6 50.0%Tipton 6 50.0%12 100.0%

305 92 30.2%Jan 2012 88 28.9%297 97.4%

308 81 26.3%Dec 2011 78 25.3%297 96.4%

317 74 23.3%Nov 2011 73 23.0%303 95.6%

327 100 30.6%Oct 2011 99 30.3%321 98.2%

329 99 30.1%Sep 2011 99 30.1%318 96.7%

328 103 31.4%Aug 2011 103 31.4%323 98.5%

352 93 26.4%Jul 2011 90 25.6%338 96.0%

370 115 31.1%Jun 2011 114 30.8%368 99.5%

368 109 29.6%May 2011 106 28.8%360 97.8%

383 136 35.5%Apr 2011 131 34.2%372 97.1%

374 128 34.2%Mar 2011 127 34.0%373 99.7%

376 103 27.4%Feb 2011 103 27.4%348 92.6%

367 84 22.9%Jan 2011 84 22.9%360 98.1%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 19

Page 20: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

• Father

• Mother

• Stepfather

• Stepmother

• Grandfather

• Grandmother

• Pre-adoptive father

• Pre-adoptive mother

• Adoptive grandparent

• Legal Guardian Children out of home with case plan goal of reunification – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have reunification as the most recently entered primary case plan goal. Children with visits to their family during the month – This section of the report shows data regarding children who have had a visit with the child’s family (as described above) begin during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month with case plan goal of reunification(as described above).

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Child Visitation Report

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

20

Page 21: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

DCS Practice Indicator Report

For January 2012

Child Visitation Report

Location

Children

Statewide Visitation Rate

Region 11 Visitation Rate

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

175 29 16.6%

Statewide

Region 11

10.79.4

11.4

15.1 14.9

19.5 18.7

23.821.6

17.4

15.113.0

16.6

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0Ja

n '1

1Feb

'11

Mar

'11

Apr

'11

May

'11

Jun '1

1

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Visit Rate

Children with visits to

their family during the month

Rate

Children out of home

with case plan goal of reunification

4,722 1,055 22.3%

Month

23.625.1

27.626.3

22.824.1

25.927.0 26.9

25.1

21.1 21.5 22.3

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Jan

'11

Feb '1

1M

ar '1

1A

pr '1

1M

ay '1

1Ju

n '11

Jul '

11A

ug '11

Sep

'11

Oct

'11

Nov '1

1D

ec '1

1Ja

n '1

2

Visit Rate

Children

Chidlren with visits to their family during the

month

Rate

Children out of home with case plan goal of

reunification

Hamilton 41 7 17.1%

Hancock 14 0 0.0%

Madison 113 18 15.9%

Tipton 7 4 57.1%

Jan 2012 175 29 16.6%

Dec 2011 177 23 13.0%

Nov 2011 179 27 15.1%

Oct 2011 184 32 17.4%

Sep 2011 176 38 21.6%

Aug 2011 172 41 23.8%

Jul 2011 187 35 18.7%

Jun 2011 205 40 19.5%

May 2011 201 30 14.9%

Apr 2011 225 34 15.1%

Mar 2011 219 25 11.4%

Feb 2011 234 22 9.4%

Jan 2011 234 25 10.7%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 21

Page 22: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This is a description of the key elements used in this report.

Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.

Assessments during time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12

months prior to the month of the report).

Victim Selection – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period.

First Occurrence – This looks at the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect during the first 6 months of the time period (6 to 12 months prior to the month of the

report). If a child was a victim in multiple assessments with substantiated abuse or neglect, the assessment with the earliest report date is considered the first occurrence.

Recurrence Time Period – The time period used to see if a child is a substantiated victim in a recurring assessment of abuse or neglect is based off the report

date of the first occurrence. The recurrence period begins one day after the first occurrence report date and ends 183 after the first occurrence report date (>= 1st

Occurrence +1 and <= 1st Occurrence +183). If a child has multiple recurrences, the earliest report date in the recurring time period is considered the recurring

assessment.

Here is a visual representation of an example. This is a report for December of a given year. The time period to review assessments would run from Jan 1st to

Dec 31st. The time period for a first occurrence would be Jan 1

s t to Jun 30

th. If a child had a first occurrence on Feb 7

th, the recurrence period would run from Feb

8th to Aug 9

th. If the child had a recurrence in Aug 5

th, that would be considered repeat maltreatment. If the child had a recurrence Oct 10

th, that would not be

considered repeat maltreatment because it fell outside the recurrence period.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Time Period (Jan 1st to Dec 31

st)

1st Occurrence Time Period (Jan 1

st to Jun 30

th)

Recurrence Period (Feb 8th

to Aug 9th)

Percent of absence of repeat maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children with a first occurrence minus the number of children with a recurrence. The denominator is the number of children with first occurrence.

(1st Occurrence – Recurrence)

1st Occurrence

For the purposes of this report, the county the child is assigned to is based off the county of first occurrence. If a child has a recurrence in a different county, the repeat will show for the county of the first occurrence.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

22

Page 23: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

410 374 91.22%

10,083 9,324 92.47%Statewide

Region 11

Statewide Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

Region 11 Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

92.2

4

92.3

7

92.4

8

92.8

1

93.0

5

93.4

1

93.4

6 92.9

1

92.5

7

92.4

4

92.1

6

92.2

6

92.4

7

90.50

91.00

91.50

92.00

92.50

93.00

93.50

94.00

94.50

95.00

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

County Absence of Repeat

Maltreatment Percent

Victims from Feb 2011 to

Aug 2011

Victims without a recurrence within 6

months

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

For January 2012

January 2012

Region 11 For January 2011 to January 2012

County Victims from Feb 2011 to

Aug 2011

Absence of Repeat

Maltreatment Percent

Victims without a recurrence within 6

months

90.1

0

89.8

1

90.5

0

90.9

4

92.4

2

93.6

6

94.1

2

93.1

5 91.9

3

92.2

9

92.2

0

93.2

7

91.2

2

87.00

88.00

89.00

90.00

91.00

92.00

93.00

94.00

95.00

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

07-

'11

08-

'11

09-

'11

10-

'11

11-

'11

12-

'11

01-

'12

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

94.60%

94.60%

National Standard

National Standard

112 104 92.86%Hamilton 94.60%

68 64 94.12%Hancock 94.60%

205 184 89.76%Madison 94.60%

25 22 88.00%Tipton 94.60%

410 374 91.22%January 2012 94.60%

416 388 93.27%December 2011 94.60%

423 390 92.20%November 2011 94.60%

415 383 92.29%October 2011 94.60%

409 376 91.93%September 2011 94.60%

438 408 93.15%August 2011 94.60%

493 464 94.12%July 2011 94.60%

473 443 93.66%June 2011 94.60%

475 439 92.42%May 2011 94.60%

508 462 90.94%April 2011 94.60%

516 467 90.50%March 2011 94.60%

520 467 89.81%February 2011 94.60%

515 464 90.10%January 2011 94.60%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 23

Page 24: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

This is a description of the key elements used in this report.

Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report.

Assessments during the time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time

period (12 months prior to the month of the report).

Victim of maltreatment in Foster Care – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period where the perpetrator is a foster parent or institutional staff.

Children in Foster Care during the time period – All CHINS children with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month

of the report. Also included are Probation children (who are IV-E eligible) with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report.

Percent of absence of maltreatment – This calculation uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children in foster care minus the

number of victims of maltreatment in foster care. The denominator is the number of children in foster care.

(Children in Foster Care – Victims of maltreatment in Foster Care) Children in Foster Care

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

For January 2012

Report Description

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

24

Page 25: Region 11 January 2012 - in.gov fileDepartment of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For January 2012 January 2012 February 2012 Region 11 Data in the report (both

19,512 29 99.85%Statewide

Region 11 700 1 99.86%

Statewide Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

99.6

7

99.6

9

99.7

0

99.7

1

99.7

0

99.7

4

99.7

4

99.7

7

99.7

6

99.7

8

99.8

1

99.8

2

99.8

5

99.5

99.55

99.6

99.65

99.7

99.75

99.8

99.85

99.9

99.95

100

01- '

1102

- '11

03- '

1104

- '11

05- '

1106

- '11

07- '

1108

- '11

09- '

1110

- '11

11- '

1112

- '11

01- '

12

Maltreatment Standard

Region 11 Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

Location Absence of Maltreatment

Percent

For January 2012

Children in Foster Care

from Feb 2011 to Jan 2012

Substantiated Victims in Foster

Care

Region 11 for January 2011 to January 2012

Month Children in Foster Care

from Feb 2011 to Jan 2012

Substantiated Victims in Foster

Care

National Standard

99.68%

Absence of Maltreatment

Percent

National Standard

99.68%

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

For January 2012

99.7

6

99.7

6

99.7

5

99.7

5

99.7

5

99.8

7

99.7

4

99.7

4

99.8

7

99.8

6

99.8

6

99.8

6

99.8

6

99.5

99.55

99.6

99.65

99.7

99.75

99.8

99.85

99.9

99.95

100

01- '

1102

- '11

03- '

1104

- '11

05- '

1106

- '11

07- '

1108

- '11

09- '

1110

- '11

11- '

1112

- '11

01- '

12

Maltreatment Standard

Hamilton 137 0 100.00% 99.68%

Hancock 82 0 100.00% 99.68%

Madison 439 1 99.77% 99.68%

Tipton 42 0 100.00% 99.68%

January 2012 700 1 99.86% 99.68%

December 2011 698 1 99.86% 99.68%

November 2011 719 1 99.86% 99.68%

October 2011 738 1 99.86% 99.68%

September 2011 753 1 99.87% 99.68%

August 2011 765 2 99.74% 99.68%

July 2011 780 2 99.74% 99.68%

June 2011 790 1 99.87% 99.68%

May 2011 796 2 99.75% 99.68%

April 2011 791 2 99.75% 99.68%

March 2011 809 2 99.75% 99.68%

February 2011 818 2 99.76% 99.68%

January 2011 827 2 99.76% 99.68%

February 01 2012

Prepared by

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 25