regional safety action plan focus group meetings group presentation 2… · • involves 4e...

26
Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings May 24 and 25, 2018 © Insert image credit here (or delete)

Upload: others

Post on 10-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings May 24 and 25, 2018

© In

sert

imag

e cr

edit

here

(or d

elet

e)

Page 2: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Agenda

Welcome and Project Introduction Review survey feedback Data analysis initial findings/facts Open discussion Wrap-up and Next Steps

Page 3: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

CDTC Overview

Population 830,000+ 2 Urban Areas

Albany-Schenectady-Troy and Saratoga Springs, NY

4 Counties 77 Municipalities

Page 4: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Fast Act (2015)

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Reduce fatalities and injuries on all public roads Focus on a state’s most critical safety needs

(strategic) Data driven reporting requirements

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) - NYSDOT HSIP Annual Report - NYSDOT Performance Measures – NYSDOT/CDTC

Coordinated Targets

Page 5: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

SHSP is the Umbrella Document

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) • Coordinated by NYSDOT • Approved by FHWA • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP • 5 year update cycle (2017)

Highway Safety Plan (HSP) • Developed by NY GTSC • Plan submitted annually (July 2017) • Behavioral programs • NHTSA approves Identical

Targets • Number of fatalities • Rate of fatalities • Number of serious injuries

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) • Developed by NYSDOT • Report submitted annually (August 2017) • Infrastructure improvements • Requirement of HSIP

Page 6: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

CDTC Safety Planning

New Visions 2040 Safety Principle: Save lives and reduce injuries Decrease traffic crashes Better respond to traffic emergencies Consider community context Reduces risk

Regional Safety Action Plan

Page 7: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

What is the Regional Safety Action Plan?

Local version of the New York State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (NY SHSP)

NY SHSP involved a detailed evaluation of statewide crash data and identified 6 areas of emphasis to reduce fatal and serious injury accidents

Page 8: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

NY SHSP Emphasis Areas

Intersections Lane Departure Vulnerable Users (bicyclists, pedestrians,

motorcyclists, and individuals working/traveling in a work zone)

Age-Related (20 and younger & 65 and older) Road User Behavior (impaired driving,

occupant protection, distracted and drowsy driving)

Speed

Page 9: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Serious Injury Rate

New York State Capital Region

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

9

9.5

10

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*

Serio

us In

jurie

s/10

0 M

VM

T

Serious Injury Rate 5 Year Rolling Average

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

9

9.5

10

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*

Serio

us In

jurie

s/10

0 M

VM

T

Serious Injury Rate 5 Year Rolling Average

The rate for serious injuries associated with vehicle crashes in the state and in the region is trending up (blue line). We want these numbers to head back down.

Page 10: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Fatality Rate

New York State Capital Region

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*

Fata

litie

s/10

0 M

VM

T

Fatality Rate 5 Year Rolling Average

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*

Fata

litie

s/10

0 M

VM

T

Fatality Rate 5 Year Rolling Average

The rate for fatalities associated with vehicle crashes in the state is trending down, but the region is starting to go up. The regional safety action plan is going to provide strategies to reduce fatal crashes and have this line trending down.

Page 11: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Region Compared to State

The four county area accounts for 6.2% of statewide crashes and 4.7% of all fatal crashes

The four county area accounts for 7.6% of alcohol related and 7.5% of impaired driving crashes

Bicycle crashes and pedestrian crashes account for 3.0% and 2.5% of the statewide crashes

Motorcycle crashes account for 6.8% of the statewide motorcycle crashes

Page 12: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Are the regional local road emphasis areas the same as the statewide emphasis areas? We don’t know yet

Page 13: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Useful Definitions

Local Road- any road in the four county area that is owned and maintained by an entity other than NYSDOT. State roads travelling through towns are typically maintained by NYSDOT where state roads through villages and cities are typically maintained by the municipality. Fore example, US Route 9 in Clifton Park is state maintained.

Serious Injury Crash- crash that results in at least 1 serious injury

Fatal Crash- crash that results in at least 1 fatality

Page 14: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

KABCO Scale

K- Fatal injuries include deaths which occur within thirty days following injury in a motor vehicle crash.

A- Severe injuries include skull fractures, internal injuries, broken or distorted limbs, unconsciousness, severe lacerations, severe burns, and unable to leave the scene without assistance.

B- Moderate injuries include visible injuries such as a “lump” on the head, abrasions, and minor lacerations.

C- Minor injuries include hysteria, nausea, momentary unconsciousness, and complaint of pain without visible signs of injury.

Unk Severity- Severity of injury unknown O- No fatality or injury; property damage only

Definitions directly from the Institute for Traffic Safety Management and Research (ITSMR). The crash data being evaluated includes KABC data.

Page 15: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

What’s Going On? (2011-2016)

30,405 = Total crashes on all roads in the four county area

15,996 = Total local road crashes in the four county area

1,810 = Total local road serious injury and fatality crashes 1,683 serious injury

127 fatality

Serious injury and fatality crashes include K and A data.

Page 16: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Local Roads: All Crashes vs. Severe Crashes

A higher percentage of severe crashes occur on dark road and curve conditions

Weather conditions do not result in increased severe crash percentages

The highest percentage of severe crashes on local roads occur where there is no traffic control

More than half of severe crashes on local roads are single vehicle crashes

Source Data from ALIS

Page 17: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Serious Injury Crashes and Fatalities Compared to VMT

Vehicle Miles Traveled

39%

16%

31%

14%

Albany Rensselaer Saratoga Schenectady

Serious Injuries & Fatalities

33%

18%

30%

19%

Albany Rensselaer Saratoga Schenectady

Page 18: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Vulnerable Users – By County

All Crashes

47%

15%

15%

23%

Albany Rensselaer Saratoga Schenectady

Serious Injuries & Fatalities

39%

16%

23%

22%

Albany Rensselaer Saratoga Schenectady

Vulnerable users includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists

Page 19: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Vulnerable Users – By User

All Crashes

26%

23%

51%

Motorcycle Bicycle Pedestrian

Serious Injuries & Fatalities

40%

17%

43%

Motorcycle Bicycle Pedestrian

Motorcycle crashes account for 26% of all crashes, but 40% of all serious injuries and fatalities.

Page 20: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Just the beginning

Urban vs Rural Roadway character Driver demographics Type of vehicle

The data will continue to be evaluated to find the emphasis areas for the four county area.

Page 21: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

11.3% of all local road crashes are fatal and serious injury crashes What do YOU think?

Page 22: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Survey Feedback

Wide range of respondents including governing and policy agencies, agencies, municipalities, citizens groups, elected officials, and hobbyists.

Frequency of transportation safety involvement ranged from daily to monthly.

The major area of concern and largest contributor to crashes was identified as distracted driving (drug use, cell phone, etc.)

Page 23: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Local Roads Crashes

Cell phone use accounted for 0 fatalities and 16 serious injury crashes regionally from 2011 to 2016 (all roads) Cell phone data wasn’t collected until part way

through the data set

Difficult to collect this data

Distracted driving accounted for 49 fatalities and 702 serious injury crashes regionally from 2011 to 2016 (all roads)

Source Data from ITSMR

The crash data doesn’t tell the whole story.

Page 24: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Measures that Improve Safety

Traffic calming High visibility

crosswalks Safe rider/driver

classes Increased

enforcement Bike paths

Uber/Lyft (other ride choice options)

Upgraded signals and infrastructure

Greater visibility of traffic control

What else?

Page 25: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

What else should we discuss?

Improve operations in areas with bad safety records

Autonomous vehicles and small vehicle detection

Improved communication between agencies, enforcement, and auto industry

Increased education (specifically power outages) Bike paths What else?

Page 26: Regional Safety Action Plan Focus Group Meetings Group Presentation 2… · • Involves 4E stakeholders • Infrastructure and behavioral countermeasures • Requirement of HSIP

Wrap Up & Next Steps

Regional Safety Summit on June 13th Continued data evaluation Stay connected!

Website: www.cdtcmpo.org/safetyplan

Email: [email protected]