regular hearing agenda february 28, 2019

Building Review Board February 28, 2019

Alan Cram, Chair City Council Chambers Tim Johnson, Vice Chair City Hall West Brad Massey 300 Laporte Avenue Bernie Marzonie Fort Collins, Colorado Katharine Penning Justin Robinson Staff Liaison:

Russ Hovland Chief Building Official

The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance.

Regular Hearing Agenda February 28, 2019

1:00 PM

• CALL TO ORDER

• ROLL CALL

• PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA

• DISCUSSION AGENDA

1. Consideration and Approval of the Minutes of the October 25, 2018 BRB Meeting2. Jason Jones Appeal of Denial of One Time Exemption of Class D1 License to Build a

Class C2 License-Level Project (4-Plex Multi-Family)3. Proposed Building Code Changes to Require Mixed Construction and Demo Waste Be

Sent to New County Recycle Sorting Facility4. Proposed Building Code Change to Allow Short-Term Rentals in Multi-Family Buildings

• OTHER BUSINESS

o Election of Officers

• ADJOURNMENT

Building Review Board

Packet Pg. 1

Date:

Roll Call Johnson Marzonie Massey Penning Vacant Robinson Cram Vote

- absent 5 present

1 – Minutes for October Massey Penning Johnson Robinson Vacant Marzonie Cram

Yes Yes Yes absent - Yes Yes 5-0

2 - Jason Jones Appeal - Modify CBO Decision Penning Johnson Robinson Vacant Marzonie Massey Cram

Yes Yes absent - Yes Yes Yes 5-0

2 - Jason Jones Appeal - Clarification amendment Marzonie Massey Penning Johnson Robinson - Cram

Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes 5-03 - Construction & Demo Waste Code Changes - Support Johnson Robinson Vacant Marzonie Massey Penning Cram

Yes absent - Yes Yes Yes Yes 5-0

4 - Short-Term Rentals Code Changes - Support Robinson Vacant Marzonie Massey Penning Johnson Cram

absent - Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5-0Election of Alan Cram as Chair and Tim Johnson as Vice Chair Vacant Marzonie Massey Penning Johnson Robinson Cram

- Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes 5-0

Roll Call & Voting RecordBuilding Review Board

2/28/2019

Building Review Board Hearing Date: 2-28-19 Document Log

(Any written comments or documents received since the agenda packet was published.) DISCUSSION AGENDA:

1. Draft Minutes for the BRB October 25, 2018 Hearing 2. Jason Jones Appeal of Denial of One Time Exemption of Class D1 License

to Build a Class C2 License-Level Project (4-Plex Multi-Family) • No new documents

3. Proposed Building Code Changes to Require Mixed Construction and

Demo Waste Be Sent to New County Recycle Sorting Facility • No new documents

4. Proposed Building Code Change to Allow Short-Term Rentals in Multi-

Family Buildings • No new documents

EXHIBITS RECEIVED DURING HEARING:

Item # Exhibit # Description: 2 A Appellant Bio

Agenda Item 1

Item 1, Page 1

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY February 28, 2019 Building Review Board

STAFF

Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant

SUBJECT

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 25, 2018 BRB MEETING

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes of the October 25, 2018 meeting of the Building Review Board.

ATTACHMENTS

1. BRB October 25, 2018 Minutes - DRAFT

Packet Pg. 2

DRAFT

City of Fort Collins Page 1 October 25, 2018

Alan Cram, Chair City Council Chambers Tim Johnson, Vice Chair City Hall West Brad Massey 300 Laporte Avenue Bernie Marzonie Fort Collins, Colorado Katharine Penning Rick Reider Staff Liaison:Justin Robinson Russ Hovland

Chief Building Official

The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance.

Regular Meeting Minutes October 25, 2018

A regular meeting of the Building Review Board was held on Thursday, October 25, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Fort Collins Municipal Building at 300 Laporte Avenue, FortCollins, Colorado.

• CALL TO ORDER

Chair Cram was unable to attend. Acting Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 1:06 p.m.

• ROLL CALL

PRESENT: Johnson, Massey, Marzonie, Penning, ReiderABSENT: Cram, Robinson STAFF: Hovland, Van Hall, Schiager, Poznanovic, Longstein

• PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA

None.

• DISCUSSION AGENDA

1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 MEETING.

Mr. Marzonie moved to approve the minutes of the September 27, 2018 meeting. Ms. Penningseconded. The motion passed 3:0 with Reider and Johnson abstaining having been absent for theSeptember meeting.

Building Review Board

ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1

Packet Pg. 3

DRAFT


2. IMPACT FEE UPDATE

Staff Report

Jennifer Poznanovic, Revenue and Project Manager, presented a condensed version of the staff report from the September meeting and noted that Council supports the concept of development paying for itself. She stated impact fees can provide revenue only for specific purposes as identified by the fee itself.

Ms. Poznanovic outlined the Council-approved impact fees, including six capital expansion fees, which are based on the replacement cost of existing infrastructure, five utility fees, and 45 development review and permit fees. She outlined the fee working group's recommendations, including better communication, outreach, and notice, highlighting the two- to four-year regular intervals for impact fee analysis, and examining progressive fees.

Ms. Poznanovic discussed the scenarios should Council opt to not adopt the increased impact fees: new infrastructure and service capacity would be put on hold, levels of service would need to be lowered, and alternative revenue sources, such as tax increases, would need to be examined.

Public Input

No members of the public were present.

Board Questions and Discussion

Mr. Reider asked what feedback staff has received on the impact fee update. Ms. Poznanovic replied she has received support of the process; however, there is not as much support for the fee increases, although no alternative funding sources have been identified.

Mr. Reider asked about operations and maintenance funding for existing facilities and infrastructure. Ms. Poznanovic replied that is a bit outside of the scope of this item as it relates to new growth paying for new facilities and infrastructure and impact fees are increasing due to replacement costs.

Mr. Johnson stated the methodology of this makes sense; however, not having the entire budget story makes it difficult to make a decision on the impact fee increases. Ms. Poznanovic replied she would share the fee position paper with the Board to provide additional detail.

Mr. Reider complimented the process and staff's openness and interest in feedback. He stated he is confident in supporting the staff recommendation given his trust in staff and the process.

Mr. Massey asked about the opinions of the Affordable Housing Board. Ms. Poznanovic replied the Board was in favor of looking at more progressive fees and additional levels for fee waivers as well as the policy components and levels of service requirements. She stated the Board was generally in favor of the process and its transparency.

Mr. Marzonie asked if there were solid numbers as to the impact of a tax increase should these fee increases not occur. Ms. Poznanovic replied that exploration of tax increase options would be the recommendation if there is inadequate support to update these fees to ensure levels of service are maintained for future growth.

Mr. Reider commented that implementing additional property taxes would change the philosophy to require the whole community to pay for growth rather than growth paying for itself.

Board Deliberation

Mr. Reider moved that the Building Review Board express support for the process of the Impact Fee recommendations.

Mr. Marzonie seconded. The motion passed 5:0.

3. 2018 I-CODES ADOPTION

Staff Report

Mr. Hovland presented the staff report and discussed each International Code being adopted. He noted the 2015 Codes were adopted late, in 2017, and the goal is to implement a regular adoption schedule every three years and to adopt the new Codes within 12 months of issuance.


Packet Pg. 4

DRAFT


Advantages of this schedule will be to minimize the impacts of changes and lessen the degree of construction cost increases as well as lessen ISO insurance rates.

Mr. Hovland discussed the process involved in examining the Codes for adoption, which began with the formation of a committee of staff and stakeholders to review the Codes and local amendments. He noted many of the local amendments are now in the Code which allowed about 1/3 of local amendments to be deleted.

Mr. Hovland highlighted some proposed local amendments to the Codes. For the International Building Code IBC, an amendment is planned to require a recycling chute next to any provided trash chute in multi-story, multi-family buildings.

Additionally, for multi-family buildings, 10% of parking spaces must have a conduit from the electrical room to the front of the parking space for the purpose of installing electric vehicle charging equipment in the future. Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the requirement causing a spider web effect in a small space. Mr. Hovland replied the Committee left flexibility on how the goal is achieved.

Mr. Hovland stated an emergency no-fee repair permit for disasters will be added to the IBC as well.

Mr. Hovland discussed minimal changes to the International Residential Code.

Mr. Hovland went on to discuss changes resulting from yesterday's final Committee meeting, one of which involved sprinkler requirements for in-home daycares of 5 or less children. The City does not receive notification of daycares as they are state regulated facilities; therefore, staff worked with Fire Chief Poncelow to remove the requirement as the home is not changing occupancy and there are 5 or less children. Mr. Reider expressed support for the change and Mr. Hovland noted there are other state fire requirements for such daycares.

Mr. Hovland stated City Council has asked about roof shingle waste over the last few years given the number of hail storms. Staff found construction materials, including shingles, make up 50% of landfill materials and there is no place for shingle recycling in Northern Colorado. The Committee discussed impact-resistant shingles at its meeting yesterday and ultimately voted to bring a local amendment to require class four impact-resistant shingles for all asphalt roofs. Mr. Hovland noted the class four shingles would likely still be destroyed in very severe hail storms with larger than golf ball size hail.

Mr. Reider expressed support for this amendment and asked if a re-roof would also require the class four shingles. Mr. Hovland replied in the affirmative.

Mr. Reider mentioned homeowner's insurance policies can include riders for Code updates which would enable homeowners to get replacement class four shingles. He suggested staff notify area insurance agents.

Mr. Massey asked for more detail about class four shingles. Mr. Hovland described the testing process and stated there are two types of class four shingles, one with a rubber backing and one with a fiberglass backing. The rubberized-backed shingles have been found to be much more storm resistant.

Mr. Massey asked if it is assumed an older roof structure could handle the weight of class four shingles. Mr. Hovland replied the Committee did not examine the potential weight of the shingles but stated older buildings with 2x4 rafters may need to be examined. He noted there is currently no requirement for a structural analysis unless the roof is concrete tile.

Ms. Penning expressed concern with imposing the requirement on older homes. Mr. Hovland replied he would be more concerned with the weight issue if roofs were getting an overlay. He noted the current Code only allows two layers and suggested language could be added to the amendment to require structural evaluation if an overlay is planned.

Mr. Hovland stated the next local amendment is to change the showerhead flow rate from 2.0 gallons per minute to 1.8 to lower water consumption. The estimate for water savings at total City build-out is 1.8 million gallons per year. Mr. Reider asked if the Committee considered longer shower use if the flow is decreased. Mr. Hovland replied the Committee ultimately felt the savings was still worth the change and stated the amendment can be reversed in three years if it is found to be an issue.

Mr. Hovland noted water conservation staff wanted to require low-flow toilets as well; however, the cast iron and clay sewer systems do not allow waste to get to the main sewer line with these low-flow toilets. Instead, staff opted to require increased MaP scores, which provide an indication of flush performance.


Packet Pg. 5

DRAFT


Mr. Reider asked if the City has any plans to research the regulation of flushable wipes. Mr. Hovland replied that issue will be examined over the next three years prior to the next Code cycle.

Mr. Hovland stated the last local amendment was a request from the Commission on Disability involving an increase to the 30" width required for roll-in showers in multi-family buildings. The Commission requested an increase from 30" x 60" to 36" x 60" minimum.

Mr. Marzonie asked about the number of accessible units required in multi-family buildings. Mr. Hovland replied buildings of 26 units must provide one roll-in shower, 55 or 56 units must provide a second, etc. The number of showers required will not change as part of this amendment.

Mr. Hovland reviewed the timeline for adoption of the Code changes.

Public Input



There was no further discussion.

Board Deliberation

Mr. Massey moved that the Building Review Board recommend the City adopt the 2018 International Codes with the local amendments as discussed.

Mr. Reider seconded. Motion passed 5:0.

4. NEW BUILDING ENERGY SCORING REQUIREMENTS

Staff Report

Kirk Longstein, Energy Services Project Manager, presented the staff report. He provided some background for the Building Energy Scoring (BES) initiative.

Mr. Longstein described the three components of BES: Benchmarking, Reporting and Transparency. Benchmarking would require building owners to collect energy and water usage data and enter it into the online EnergyStar Portfolio Manager tool. Reporting would require building owners to report the data annually to the City where it would be verified. Transparency makes the scores publicly available.

Mr. Longstein explained the phased implementation approach. Phase 1 would be for commercial buildings, not including industrial, with Benchmarking occurring in 2019, Reporting in 2020, and Transparency beginning in 2021. Multi-family buildings, which refers to large apartment or condominium complexes, would follow the same timeline, but one year later.

He discussed consequences of non-compliance, which would include notifications and warnings for 12 months after the reporting is due, followed by a $1,000 fine 60-90 days after the 12-month period.

Exemptions and variances from the plan will be offered for industrial buildings, financial distress, partial occupancy and new construction. Other hardship scenarios will be subject to review on a case-by-case basis through an appeal process.

Public Input



Ms. Penning asked about the new construction exemption. Mr. Longstein explained this was to allow time to collect a year’s worth of data after the Certificate of Occupancy is issued and reach greater than 60% occupancy.

Ms. Penning asked if the City would be providing the data collection and reporting tool. Mr. Longstein explained the City would provide training and would have support staff available to use the online Portfolio Manager.

Mr. Reider asked how building owners can access usage information since federal laws prohibit Utilities from disclosing tenant energy use, and who would pay for the data collection. Mr. Longstein said the intent is to make the information more readily available by providing aggregate anonymized data for buildings with four or more tenants. He said the only cost to building owners would be the staff time,


Packet Pg. 6

DRAFT


which is estimated to be four hours the first year and one to two hours for each subsequent year. Mr. Longstein said the City will validate the data through spreadsheet automation using existing staff resources.

Mr. Massey asked whether the City intends in the future to require building owners to make changes to reduce usage. Mr. Longstein said that is not the intent of this proposal, but he can’t predict the actions of a future Council.

Mr. Massey asked how building owners with fewer than four tenants can access usage data, and who would be responsible for data collection and reporting in a co-ownership situation. Mr. Longstein stated an owner of the building can get easily obtain aggregated data from City, while Xcel has a consent form process which might be more challenging. A shared ownership group can designate someone to be the responsible party.

Ms. Penning asked if the data can be auto-generated rather than manually entered. Mr. Longstein said this was possible with City Utilities, but not with Xcel, adding that engagement with the utility bills is what leads to behavioral savings. Ms. Penning expressed concern that building owners may opt to pay the fine in lieu of participating. Mr. Longstein stated non-participation may impact a building owner’s ability to be competitive in the market.

Mr. Johnson asked why the owner is responsible for reporting and not the tenant. Mr. Longstein said the market places value in the transparency of information which can serve to incentivize the owner, but tenants are unlikely to make improvements on a rental.

Mr. Reider said he would not support this initiative without much more information about the program, its components and the costs. As a building owner who would be personally impacted by the program, he will abstain from voting.

Mr. Massey expressed concerned about the uncertainties involving co-ownership.

Mr. Johnson sees value in the idea of scoring but is concerned it would become punitive and feels there is a lack of well-defined specifics.

Mr. Marzonie asked what feedback has been offered from other groups. Mr. Longstein shared that they have heard concerns about the time and cost involved, the impact on affordability, difficulty accessing data and fear of additional regulation in the future. He has also heard that this is a way for businesses to differentiate themselves in the market, adding that many national brands and big box retailers have already been voluntarily participating for years.

Mr. Marzonie asked if there was a possibility of starting as a voluntary program. Mr. Longstein said there is a high cost for incentives to make voluntary programs successful. Other communities who started with voluntary programs have moved to mandatory programs due to issues with predictability and insufficient mass of data.

Mr. Reider said people choose a building based on location, rather than minor variations in utility cost. He would be willing to entertain further should they come back with additional information.

Board Deliberation

Mr. Reider moved that the Building Review Board abstain from making a recommendation for or against Building Energy Scoring Requirements.

Mr. Marzonie seconded. The motion passed 5:0.

5. 2019 WORK PLAN

Staff Report

Mr. Hovland presented the proposed work plan.

Public Input



Mr. Reider asked a committee would be formed to work on the Property Maintenance Code. Mr. Hovland stated he will explore that. Mr. Reider requested written copy for input.


Packet Pg. 7

DRAFT


Board Deliberation

Mr. Massey moved that the Building Review Board approve the 2019 Work Plan as presented.

Ms. Penning seconded. The motion passed 5:0.

• OTHER BUSINESS

None

• ADJOURNMENT

Acting Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 3:05 p.m.

Minutes respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager.

Minutes approved by a vote of the Board on __________. _________________________________ ______________________________ Russell Hovland, Chief Building Official Alan Cram, Chair


Packet Pg. 8

Agenda Item 2

Item 2, Page 1

Staff Report February 28, 2019 Building Review Board STAFF Russ Hovland, Chief Building Official SUBJECT JASON JONES APPEAL OF DENIAL OF ONE TIME EXEMPTION OF CLASS D1 LICENSE TO BUILD A CLASS C2 LICENSE-LEVEL PROJECT (4-PLEX MULTI-FAMILY) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary: Jason Jones currently has a Class D1 license allowing him to build new housing of not more than two (2) dwelling units. Jason has built four (4) new single-family detached homes in city limits and is in good standing. Jason would like to be approved as the permit holder and general contractor (GC) to build a 4-unit multi-family building (4-plex) which requires a higher-level Class C2 license. Appeal: Jason requested from the Chief Building Official (CBO) a one-time exemption for a Class C2 level license to be allowed to perform as the GC for a new 4-plex using his existing Class D1 license. This request was denied by the CBO on February 1, 2019. Jason feels strongly that based on his knowledge and resources he can successfully complete such a project and thinks the request should be approved. See supporting attachments and documentation. The Board’s jurisdiction for this appeal is Municipal Code Section 5-27(11) Section 113.1, which empowers this Board to hear and decide appeals of decisions by the CBO relative to the application and interpretation of the Municipal Code and Section 15-158(a)(2), which relates to the contractor licensing requirements of the City of Fort Collins. Staff recommendation: A 4-plex is a multi-family building under the International Building Code (IBC), and a very different type of construction project compared to a single-family house (dwelling separations, fire sprinklers systems, etc.) built under the International Residential Code (IRC). When GC can show they have supervised the building of at least two (2) multi-family buildings, the CBO does approve a third project under the current lower license and this project can then be used to apply for the higher license with the 3 required project examples. Jason does not have this required experience and needs additional training and guidance on new multi-family construction. I recommend denial of a one-time license exemption for said project.

Packet Pg. 9

Agenda Item 2

Item 2, Page 2

Board or Commission may vote to: • Uphold the decision of the CBO and find that the Mr. Jones cannot perform as GC and obtain the permit for

this multi-family project.

• Overturn the decision of the CBO and allow Mr. Jones to act as the GC and permit holder for this project under his current D-1 license.

• Modify the decision of CBO. For example, the Board may allow Mr. Jones to act as GC and permit holder for this project with supervision by a current licensed C contractor (mentorship).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Appeal Application 2. Appellant Letter to Board 3. Appellant 4-plex Construction Plans.

Packet Pg. 10

Cltyof

~Colli~ Planning, Development & Transportation Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue, P.O. Box 580 Fort CoDlns, CO 80622.0580

970A16.2740 970.224.8134- fax fcgov.com

REQUEST FOR HEARING BY THE BUILDING REVIEW BOARD (Code Hearing)

Affected Property: ___ 2_1_2_s_c_a_n_·b_o_u_D_r_iv_e_F_o_rt_c_o_ll_in_s ________________ _

Owner: Jason Jones - NoCO Custom Homes

Address: 4181 Grand Park Drive Timnath

Appellant Name: Jason Jones

Address: 4181 Grand Park Drive Timnath

Phone #: Mobile # 970-581-0481 ------- E-mail: [email protected]

Description of request and mitigating factors ( attach additional information and/or materials): ------

1 request a one time exemption for the requirement to hold a "C" license for the construction of this

4-plex unit. I currently hold a "D" license in good standing with the City. I have the knowledge

and resources necessary to successfully construct this building while conforming with all code

requirements. This 4-plex building will be held personally upon completion as a rental property, we

are not building this to sell.

Applicable Code Sections:. __________________________ _

==-==~ ~ Appell ~ Signature

2/12/19

Date

Appellant may appear in person, in writing, or by agent and should be prepared to present all relevant details, specifications and plans, or other evidence in support of this hearing request at the hearing time indicated below.

Regular meetings are scheduled for the last Thursday of each month at 1 :00 p.m. In the Council Chambers at 300 LaPorte Avenue. Applications must be flled by the last day of the month prior to the desired hearing date to ensure consideration. A docket fee of $50.00 must accompany this hearing request.

OFFICE USE ONLY

Hearing Date ___________ _ Hearing Time ___________ _

Re~ewedby _________________________________________ ~

Distribution: Original - Appellant, Copy - File


Packet Pg. 11

NoCO Custom Homes PO BOX 187 Timnath CO 80547 www.NoCOCustomHomes.com

[email protected] To whom it may concern:

I am requesting a one-time exemption to the City of Fort Collins building services appeals board to build a 4-plex unit without the proper licensure. I currently hold a “D” license in good standing with the City since February of 2015. I have successfully completed numerous complex, high end single family residential projects within the city and dozens more in jurisdictions around the city since 2007. I have owned and operated NoCO Custom Homes since 2012 and have built a reputation of quality and attention to detail since day one. The 4-plex is located at 2126 Caribou dr Fort Collins and it is a building that we will be holding, upon completion as a rental property. I’m requesting to pull permits and manage this project myself and believe I have the experience and resources necessary to complete this project successfully. I commonly work closely with the architect, engineer and building department if there are any code or plan questions. The size and scope of this project is no different than what we build on a regular basis. Over the last 4 years we’ve averaged 10 high end custom homes per year that are often larger and more complex than the 4-plex we are requesting to build through this appeals process. The below link is my website portfolio for examples of these types of projects that I regularly manage:

https://nococustomhomes.com/portfolio/

I appreciate your consideration to my appeal. As I’m not building this 4-plex for a client or to sell, no one will benefit more than me for a speedy and successful project completion. I also believe that if my appeal is not granted, I would be putting another license holder in a position of liability that would make it inequitable to pull the permit on my behalf with my company listed as the supervisor. For these reasons I’m requesting a one-time exemption so that my company can pull the permits and build this 4-plex.

Thank you

Jason Jones

Owner


Packet Pg. 12

FORT COLLINS, CO

12.07

.11 P

ERMI

T

A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANA2.0 FOUNDATION PLAN (ARCHITECTURAL)A2.1 MAIN FLOOR PLANA2.2 UPPER FLOOR PLANA2.3 ROOF PLANA3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA4.0 BUILDING SECTIONSA4.1 MISC. DETAILSA4.2 MISC. DETAILSA6.1 MAIN FLOOR ELECT PLANA6.2 UPPER FLOOR ELECT PLAN

0.0 COVER SHEETPROJECT INFORMATION:PROJECT NAME: SUNSTONE 4-PLEXLOCATION: LOT 13 SUNSTONE SUBDIVISION, 2126 CARIBOU DRIVE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADOOWNER: NOCO CUSTOM HOMES, RE: JASON JONES

APPLICABLE CODES & REQUIREMENTS:2015 International Building Code with local Amendments2015 International Residential Code with local Amendments2015 International Energy Conservation Code with local Amendments2015 International Mechanical Code with local Amendments2015 International Fuel Gas Code with local Amendments2015 International Plumbing Code2017 National Electrical Code (effective July 3, 2017)2006 International Property Maintenance Code with local AmendmentsAccessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 and ICC A117.1-2017Snow Load - Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSFFrost Depth 30 inchesWind Load: 129 mph Vult, or 100 mph Vasd - Exposure BSeismic Design Category B

BUILDING CODE SUMARY:

OCCUPANCY GROUP R-2 SECTION 310

ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA7,000 PER STORY TABLE 503SPRINKLER SYSTEM INCREASE 200% (Is=2) SECTION 506.3

ALLOWED 14,000 SF PER STORYPROVIDED <4,000 SF PER STORY

PROVIDED BUILDING AREA (2-STORY) SECTION 503

1ST FLOOR FINISHED AREA 630 SF1ST FLOOR UN-FINISHED AREA 345 SF

TOTAL 1ST FLOOR AREA 975 SF2ND FLOOR FINISHED AREA 880 SF2ND FLOOR UN-FINISHED FINISHED AREA 0 SF

TOTAL 2ND FLOOR AREA 880 SFUNIT AREA TOTAL 1855 SF (UNIT TOTAL FINISHED SF=1,510 SF)NUMBER OF UNITS 4

TOTAL BUILDING AREA 7420 SF(14,000 SF ALLOWED BY TABLE 503, NO AREA INCREASE NECESSARY)

ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHTIN STORIES 2 TABLE 503

(SPRINKLER SYSTEM INCREASE +1 STORY, +20 FT PER SECTION 504.2, NO HEIGHT INCREASE NECESSARY)

IN FEET MAX (UNKNOWN)IN STORIES 3 MAX PER ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF FORT COLLINS

PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHTIN STORIES 2IN FEET 32'-0"

CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATIONV-B, WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM 13R SECTION 602.5

AREA SEPARATION CHAPTER 7FIRE PARTITION SECTION 420.2

BETWEEN DWELLINGS UNITS 1 HR W/ SPRINK. SYSTEM SECTION 709.3.2CORRIDOR WALLS (>10 OCC) 1 HR W/ SPRINK. SYSTEM NA TABLE 1018.1

CONTINUITY NOT REQUIRED AS ATTIC SPACE IS SUBDIVIDED INTOAREAS OF <3,000 SF. SECTION 709.4.5(1-HR WALL PROVIDED, GA WP 3370/UL U305 CONTINUOUS TO ROOF BETWEEN CENTER UNITS RE: PLANS)

HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SECTION 420.3BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS 1 HR W/ SPRINK. SYSTEM SECTION 712.3 (exception)

FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR V-B CHAPTER 6STRUCTURAL FRAME 0 HR TABLE 601BEARING WALLS EXT. & INT. 0 HR.NONBEARING WALLS EXT. 0 HR.NONBEARING WALLS INT. 0 HR.FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 0 HR.ROOF CONSTRUCTION 0 HR.

FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXT. WALLS BASED ON SEP. DIST. TABLE 602WITHIN 10 TO 30 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE FOR V-B CONSTRUCTION 0 HR.

OPENING PROTECTIVESDOORS IN CORRIDOR 20 MIN NA SECTION 715.4.3

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 9FIRE SPRINKLER YES SECTION 903.2.8EXTINGUISHERS YES (1 PER UNIT) SECTION 906.1.1FIRE ALARM SYSTEM YES SECTION 907.2.9.1SMOKE ALARM SYSTEM YES SECTION 907.2.11.2VISIBLE ALARM NOTIFICATIONS APPLIANCES YES SECTION 907.5.2.3.4

EGRESS REQUIREMENTSCORRIDOR WIDTH 44" NA SECTION 1018.2

WITHIN DWELING UNITS 36" PROVIDED SECTION 1018.2.2STAIRS WIDTH (> 50 OCC) 36" WITHIN UNIT SECTION 1009.1RISER 4"-7" SECTION 1009.4.2TREAD 10"HANDRAIL HT. 34"-38" SECTION 1012.2

BUILDING OCCUPANT LOAD (RESIDENTIAL) TABLE 1004.1.1200 SF GROSS PER OCCUPANTPER UNIT (1,510 / 200) 8 OCCUPANTSPER BUILDING (4 x 8) 32 OCCUPANTS

EGRESS WIDTHSTAIRS 8 OCCUPANTS x 0.3 = 2.4" REQUIRED SECTION 1005.1

36" PROVIDEDEXIT DOOR 8 OCCUPANTS x 0.2 = 1.6" REQUIRED

(2) 36" WIDE DOORS = 72" PROVIDED

PROJECT LOCATION

SITE LOCATION

TRAVEL DISTANCE TABLE 1016.1R OCC. W/ SPRINKLER SYSTEM 250' NACPET W/ SPRINKLER SYSTEM 125' NA SECTION 1014.3.4

CPET: COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL

EMERGENCY ESCAPE & RESCUE SECTION 1029SIZE MIN 5.7 SF, HEIGHT 24", WIDTH 20", MAX 44" AFF

ACCESSIBILITY CHAPTER 10TYPE A UNITS (>20 UNITS) MIN 2% OF ALL UNITS, (MIN 1) SECTION 1107.6.2.1.1

NOT REQUIRED, STRUCTURE WITH 4 UNITS TOTALTYPE B UNITS SECTION 1107.6.2.1.2

STRUCTURES WITHOUT ELEVATOR SECTION 1107.7.1- 1ST STORY ALL- B TYPE UNITS REQ'D SECTION 1107.7.1.1- 2ND STORY NO - B TYPE UNITS REQ'D SECTION 1107.7.2

PLUMBING SYSTEM CHAPTER 29FIXTURE REQ'D PROVIDED TABLE 2902.1WATER CLOSET 1 PER UNIT 3LAVATORY 1 PER UNIT 3TUB OR SHOWER 1 PER UNIT 2KITCHEN SINK 1 PER UNIT 1WASHER CONNECTION 1 PER 20 UNITS 1 IN EACH UNIT

STC RATINGS:FIRE PARTITION WALL WP 3370 (UL U305) WITH 6" SOUND BATTS CONTINUOUS WITH

STAGGERED STUDS

HORIZONTAL SEPARATION NA (NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATION NEC'Y IN SINGLE UNITS)

LOAD CALCULATIONS:Snow Load - Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load: 30 PSFFrost Depth: 30 inchesWind Load: 100 MPH - 3 Second Gust Exposure BSeismic Design Category B

SUNSTONE 4-PLEXLOT 13 SUNSTONE MULTI-USE2126 CARIBOU DRIVEFORT COLLINS, COLORADO

ARCHITECTSCH2 ARCHITECTSP: 970.817.5260E: [email protected]

WWW.SCH2ARCHITECTS.COM

BUILDER

PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEXSITE MAPPROJECT DATA

VICINITY MAP

ARCHITECTURAL:

5'-6"

6'-0

"7'

-6"

6'-8" 13'-0"

5'-5

"

CARIBOU STREET

TIMBE

RLIN

E RO

AD

STO

NEY

CREE

K DR

IVE

THE STANDARD GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE BUILDER. SHALLGOVERN EXCEPT AS MODIFIED AND SUPPLEMENTED BY THESE PLANS.

CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ON SITE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.

DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWINGS. DO NOT SCALE. ALLDIMENSIONS GIVEN TO FACE OF STUDS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ONPLANS.

ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCALCODES. SECURE ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO ANYCONSTRUCTION.

COMPONENT SUPPLIER/FABRICATOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALENGINEERING AND COMPLIANCE WITH BUILDERS WARRANTYSPECIFICATIONS.

FIRESTOP ALL FLUES

ALL G.W.B. TO BE INSTALLED

PROVIDE TILE (SIMILAR) TO 70" ABOVE SHOWER/TUB DRAIN.

WOOD LESS THAN 6" ABOVE GRADE OR IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE SHALLBE TREATED OR WOOD OF NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY

INSULATE PER THE FOLLOWING-MIN R-20 HIGH DENSITY BATT, IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS.-MIN R-49 IN ALL ROOF AREAS-MIN R-30 IN JOIST SPACES NEXT TO UNHEATED AREAS

PROVIDE GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS TO CREATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAYFROM BUILDING/FOUNDATION (MIN. 5'-0" REMOVAL DISTANCE FROM FACE OFSTRUCTURE). CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUTSPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

ALL WINDOWS WITH GRIDS AS SELECTED BY BUILDER. WEATHERSTRIPPEDAND DOUBLE GLAZED. ATRIUM AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS AT HAZARDOUSLOCATIONS TO BE TEMPERED GLASS

LOCATION OF METERS, UTILITIES AND MAJOR APPLIANCES (IE FURNACE,WATER HEATER, ETC.) ARE APPROXIMATE, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFYFINAL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION

STAIR ASSEMBLIES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF (3) STRINGERS

PROVIDE TRUSS & FLOOR JOIST BLOCKING RE: STRUCTURAL

STAIRS & LANDINGS

HANDRAIL - WIDTH TO BE 1 1/4" - 2" MAX

ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION MUST BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE,ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES AND BUILDER SPEC.

ALL FOUNDATION WALL W/ PERIMETER DRAIN ARE TO BE DAMP PROOFEDRE: SOILS

PROVIDE FIRESAFING AS REQUIRED EQUIVALENT TO THERMAFIBER BYUSG.

EXIT DOOR HARDWARE SHALL COMPLY WITH SPANJER HOMESSPECIFICATIONS.

ALL EXTERIOR DOORS TO BE WEATHERSTRIPPED.

INSTALL PEEPHOLE ON ENTRY DOORS AND SECURITY BAR ON SLIDINGGLASS DOORS

EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED INSUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WATERPROOF.

PROVIDE FIRE BLOCKING & DRAFTSTOP AT ALL CONCEALED SPACES OFWALLS, STAIR STRINGERS, FLOOR & CEILING OPENINGS AND SOFFITS

NORTH

NORTH

GENERAL NOTESVIEW FROM SOUTHEAST (INTERSECTION OF CARIBOU AND STONEY CREEK)

VIEW FROM NORTHWEST

3D IMAGES

08.21

.18 P

ERMI

T12

.08.18

CLIE

NT C

HANG

ES

NoCO Custom Homes, LLCTel: 970-581-0481www.NoCOCustomHomes.com

Re: Jason [email protected]

01.27

.19 C

ITY C

OMME

NTS

INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE

CLIENT UPDATE 07.12.18

2ND FLR 866 SFFIRST FLR 630 SF

TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO

DOUGLAS A. SCHOONOVERARCHITECT, NCARB

www.sch2architects.comt: 970.817.5260

e: [email protected]

SCH ARCHITECTS


CITY COMMENTS 01.27.19

COVERSHEET

0.0


Packet Pg. 13

5'-6"

6'-0

"7'

-6"

6'-8" 13'-0"

5'-5

"

5'-6"12'-0"5'-2"12'-0"1'-4"

12'-0"5'-2"12'-0"5'-5"5'-0" 5'-0"

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

NEWCONCRETESHOWNWITHHATCHPATTERN

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

BUILDER TO VERIFY BUILDING ENVELOPE LOCATION,SETBACKS AND PROPERTY LINE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION

4'-0

"5'

-0"

4'-0

"5'

-0"

20'-0

"

EXISTING PAVED ALLEY

EXIS

TIN

G P

AVED

DR

IVE

26'-6

"56

'-8"

25'-8"70'-7"30'-0"

27'-2

"

ATTIC AREA1,780 SF

ATTIC AREA1,780 SF

71'-0"

57'-6

"

92'-712"

4'-1112" 16'-8"

17'-5

1 2"7'

-41 2"

ASSUMEDPROPERTYLINE

BUILDINGENVELOPE

EXISTINGUTILITYEASEMENT

SIDEWALK

SLOPE GRADEAWAY FROMSTRUCTURE AT1:3 MAX

SLOPE GRADEAWAY FROMSTRUCTURE AT1:3 MAX

PRUNE ANDPROTECT ALLEXISTING SITESHRUBS ANDTREES

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

EXISTINGUTILITYEASEMENT

ASSUMEDPROPERTYLINE

BUILDINGENVELOPE

CONCRETECONTROLJOINTSPERBUILDERSPEC.

ELECTRICALMETERS

GASMETERS

NEW

SID

EWAL

K

NEW SIDEWALKNEW SIDEWALK

ACCESSIBLERAMPPERCITYSTANDARDS

NEW SIDEWALKNEW SIDEWALK

SCALE:1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1/8"=1'-0" -

ARCHITECTURALSITE

PLAN

1.0INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



NORTH


Packet Pg. 14

UNIT(1)

UNIT(2)

UNIT(3)

UNIT(4)

UNEXCAVATED 4" THICK CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE

UNEXC'TED 4" THICK CONCRETE


14.0

14.0

24.0

24.0

UNEXCAVATEDSLOPE 4" THICK CONCRETE TOWARD GARAGE DOORS

SLAB ON GRADE

1

3

3SIM

2

1

3

2

5'-3

1 2"56

'-8"


SLAB ON GRADE




SLAB ON GRADE

1

3

2

1

3

2


SLAB ON GRADE

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54

54 54

54

54

54

54




3'-7" 13'-0"8"

5" 5"

56'-8

"

70'-7"

11'-3" 11'-212" 6'-51

2" 11'-2" 11'-212"

17'-3"10"

16'-912" 10" 16'-91

2"10"

17'-3"6'-5"6'-5" 6'-51

2"

70'-7"5'-0" 13'-1" 5'-0" 12'-21

2" 5'-0" 13'-1" 5'-0"12'-212"10"

10"3'-91

2" 13'-0"10"

13'-0" 3'-912"

10"13'-0" 3'-7"

8"

5'-0

"30

'-5"

7'-1

1 2"14

'-11 2"

5'-0

"30

'-5"

7'-1

1 2"14

'-11 2"

5'-0

"30

'-5"

7'-1

1 2"14

'-11 2"

5'-0

"30

'-5"

7'-1

1 2"14

'-11 2"

SCALE:1 FOUNDATION PLAN (ARCHITECTURAL)1/4"=1'-0" -

FOUNDATIONPLAN

(ARCHITECTURAL)

2.0INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



(ALL NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET)PLAN NOTES

1. UNEXCAVATED 4" THICK SLAB, SLOPE FLOOR MIN 4" TOWARDSDOOR2. 4" CONCRETE SLAB. RE: STRUCT3. DEPRESS FOUNDATION WALL AS NEEDED AT AT GARAGE DOOROPENING4. PROVIDE HIGH AND LOW AIR SUPPLY/RETURN, ONE WITHIN 12" OFCEILING PLANE.

ONE AT 12" A.F.F., SIZE AND LOCATION PER IMC5. FOUNDATION LINE BEYOND6. STEP AT GARAGE/UNIT (FRAMED)7. DUST LIP8. GARAGE DOOR AS PER ELEVATIONS/BUILDERS SPEC9. GARAGE SEPARATION-1 LAYER 5/8" G.W.B. ON GARAGE SIDE AND 20MIN. DOOR

WITH SELF-CLOSING HINGES.10. TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY-2X6 STUDS (UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED) AT 16" O.C. W/ 1/2" GWB OVER VAPORBARRIER ON INTERIOR FACE AND BLDG WRAP OVER 1/2" SHEATHINGON EXTERIOR FACE-FINISH AS PER ELEVATIONS.11. TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY - 2x4 STUDS (UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED) AT 16" O.C. WITH 12" GWB ON EACH FACEUNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.12. TYPICAL 1 HOUR FIRE PARTITION ASSEMBLY - ( UL# U305 / GA. WP3370 OR EQUAL) ONE LAYER 5/8" TYP X GWB APPLIED PARALLEL OR ATRIGHT ANGLES TO EACH SIDE OF DOUBLE ROW OF 2X4 WOOD STUDS 16"O.C. ON SEPARATE PLATES SET 1" APART WITH 6d COATED NAILS, 1 7/8"LONG, 0.0915" SHANK, 1/4" HEADS, 7" O.C.. JOINTS STAGGERED 16"OPPOSITE SIDES. HORIZONTAL BRACING REQUIRED AT MID-HEIGHT. FORSTC RATING OF >50, PLACE CONTINUOUS BLANKET OF 6" GLASS FIBERINSULATION IN STUD SPACE. DRAFTSOP AS REQUIRED13. 60"x30" TUB/SHOWER WITH TILE SURROUND W/INDIVIDUALPRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE ANDHANDLE POSITION STOPS ADJUSTED PER MFR'S INSTRUCTIONSFOR 120 DEG. F MAX WATER TEMP. PER THE IPC.14. 60"X36" SHOWER WITH INDIVIDUAL PRESSURE BALANCE ORTHERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE AND HANDLE POSITIONSTOPS ADJUSTED PER MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR 120 DEGREE F,MAX. WATER TEMP. PER THE IPC.15. WASHER/DRYER HOOKUPS, VENT DRYER TO EXTERIOR.16. COUNTER TOP.17. ROD AND SHELF.18. DOUBLE ROD AND SHELF. - NOT USED19. LINEN WITH 5 FIXED SHELVES.20. PANTRY W/ 5 FIXED SHELVES21. FROST FREE HOSE BIB.22. LINE OF VAULT/VOLUME SPACE.23. CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE.24. CONTROL JOINTS.25. DROPPED SOFFIT.26. SHELF.27. FIREPLACE, VENT PER MANFR'S SPES. - NOT USED28. WATERPROOF GYP BD AT TUB/SHOWER.29. CASED OPENING.30. 2x6 WALL.31. 22"X30" ACCESS PANEL W/ PULL-CHAIN LIGHT.32. RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. - NOT USED33. FLOOR DRAIN.34. FLUE CHASE-VENT TO EXTERIOR.35. STONE VENEER (RE: ELEV).36. STONE/TRIM PACKOUT.37. EGRESS WINDOW/WELL PER CODE.38. FRAMED PLATFORM 18" AFF.39. RE: STRUCTURAL40. LOW WALL (36" MAX. U.N.O.)41. LOW CABINETS42. HIGH CABINETS43. 1030 TRANSOM WINDOW44. WATER HEATER45. FURNACE46. GWB BULKHEAD47. MICROWAVE48. DISH WASHER49. REFERIGERATOR50. RANGE51. RAIL WITH BALLUSTERS AND NEWELL POST52. MIRROR-BY BUILDER53. LINE OF ROOF54. LINE OF SLAB ON GRADE LEDGE - 2"X4" LEDGE BLOCKOUT

FOUNDATION/FLOOR PLAN NOTESX

NORTH


Packet Pg. 15

14.0

14.0

24.0

24.0

70'-7"

56'-8

"

70'-7"

ENTRY9' CLG

11'-3" 11'-212" 6'-51

2"

1'-4

"56

'-8"

3'-8

"3'

-0"

3'-0

"3'

-0"

15'-0

"3'

-10"

23'-1

0"

PROVIDE (1)WATER RISER

ROOM NEARWATER

SERVICEENTRY

ENTRY9' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLGBATH

VINYL9' CLG

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

STORAGE4'-3" X 2'-6"

CONC

ENTRY9' CLG

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

ENTRY9' CLG

FIRE RISERCONC

UNIT (1)1,495 SF

UNIT (2)1,495 SF

UNIT (3)1,495 SF

UNIT (4)1,495 SF

1'-4"3'-8" 6'-5" 5'-10"

1012"

3'-3" 6'-5" 6'-5" 3'-212"

11"5'-10" 6'-5" 3'-8"

1'-4"

17'-3"10"

16'-912"

10"

10"5'-41

2"10"

5'-412"

5'-0"10"

1'-4

" 3'-8

"3'

-0"

3'-0

"3'

-0"

15'-0

"3'

-10"

9'-8

1 2"3'

-8"

UP 15R

4'-9" 12'-6"

4'-512" 7'-01

2" 5'-9"10"

3'-1112" 1'-91

2" 3'-1" 7'-3"10"

2'-6"2'-6"2'-6" 2'-6"

8'-1

0"4'

-11"

2'-4

1 2"6'

-10"

4'-3

1 2"3'

-31 2"

2'-0

"

3'-3

1 2"

6"1'

-4"3'-2

"

6"1'

-4" 3'

-2"

5'-0

"

1'-2"

4'-0

"2'

-0"

2'-1

"2'

-71 2"

111 2"4'

-0"

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

11'-5

1 2"5'

-0"

17'-8" 17'-712"

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLGBATH

VINYL9' CLG

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG


CONC

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

UP 15R

4'-312" 12'-6"

4'-0"

8'-1

0"4'

-11"

2'-4

1 2"6'

-10"

7'-7

"

3'-3

1 2"

CPT

VCT

5'-0

"

3'-6"

9080 OHD 9080 OHD

(2) 3060 SH

30-6

8

(2) 3060 SH

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

3060

SH

3068

3068

2868

3068

PR 2668

FD FD

PR 2668

3068

2868

3068

51

25

23

4021

HB

21

HB

48

4750

49

17

9

9

30

45

44

25

38

10

51

25

12

23

17

9

9

30

45

44

25

38

BATHVINYL9' CLG

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

17'-3"10"

16'-912"

UP 15R

4'-9"12'-6"

4'-0"

3'-6"10"

8'-7

"4'

-11"

2'-4

1 2"6'

-10"

7'-7

"

3'-3

1 2"

1'-2"

CPT

VCT

5'-0

"

17'-8"17'-712"

BATHVINYL9' CLG

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG


CONC

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

UP 15R

4'-312"12'-6"

4'-0"

8'-1

0"4'

-11"

2'-4

1 2"6'

-10"

7'-7

"

3'-3

1 2"

CPT

3'-6"1'-2"

9080 OHD9080 OHD

(2) 3060 SH(2) 3060 SH

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

3060

SH

3068

3068

2868

PR 2668

FDFD

3068

2868

3068

51

25

23

17

9

9

30

45

44

25

38

51

25

23

17

9

9

30

45

44

25

38

10

11'-2" 11'-212"

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

LAN

DSC

APE

AREA

SIDEWALK

BUILDING ENVELOPE

NEW CONCRETESHOWN WITHHATCH PATTERN

12

12


CONC

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

EXTEND THIS FIRE PARTIONTO UNDERSIDE OF ROOFDECK TO ACT AS DRAFTSTOP WITHIN THE ATTIC SPACE

NOTE:FIRST FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOBE DETERMINED UPON COMPLETION OF SITETOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY BUILDER.

16

5'-1112"

1112"

20 20

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

CPT

VCT 40

48

4750

49

16

1'-2"1'-91

2"

3'-1" 7'-3"

7'-0" 5'-912"

2'-1

"2'

-71 2"

111 2"4'-0

"

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

7'-012"5'-9"

1'-912"3'-1"7'-3"

2'-0

"4'

-0"

2'-0

"2'

-4"

2'-7

1 2"11

1 2"4'

-0"

CPT

VCT

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

40

48

4750

49

16

5'-1112"

1112"

20

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

CPT

VCT40

48

4750

49

16

1'-912"

3'-1"7'-3"

7'-0"5'-912"

2'-1

"2'

-71 2"

111 2" 4'

-0"

20

5'-612"

1112"

5'-6"111

2"

30-6

8

30-6

8

30-6

8

VCT

3010 FX TRANS ABOVE

17'-3"10"

16'-912" 10" 16'-91

2"10"

17'-3"

10"

6'-5"6'-5" 6'-512"

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

14'-1

1 2"

1012"

6"1'

-4"

13'-1" 5'-0" 12'-212"

1012"

5'-0"

6"1'

-4"

13'-1" 5'-0"12'-212"

3010 FX TRANS ABOVE3010 FX TRANS ABOVE3010 FX TRANS ABOVE

5'-0

"20

'-2"

PR 2668

SLOPEDCEILINGBELOWSTAIRSRATEDASSEMBLY




CONCRETE CONTROL JOINTSPER BUILDER SPEC.

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

AC

7'-0

"

7'-0

"

AC ACAC

COORDINATE EXACT AC CONDENSORLOCATION WITH BUILDER PREFERENCE

ELECTRICALMETERS

GASMETERS

4'-0

"

SCALE:1 MAIN FLOOR PLAN1/4"=1'-0" -

MAIN FLOOR

PLAN

2.1INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS








NORTH


Packet Pg. 16

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBTHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

5'-1" 12'-2"5'-012" 11'-9"

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBATHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBTHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBATHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

UNIT(1)

UNIT(2)

UNIT(3)

UNIT(4)

4'-2" 4'-1012" 4'-1" 4'-11

2" 3'-812" 4'-101

2" 4'-1" 4'-112" 3'-91

2" 4'-412" 4'-7" 4'-01

2" 3'-10" 4'-412" 4'-7" 4'-51

2"

7'-1112" 3'-11" 5'-41

2" 7'-6" 3'-1012" 5'-41

2" 5'-1" 3'-1012" 7'-91

2" 5'-1" 3'-11" 8'-3"

3'-6"

4'-0" 9'-312"

10"3'-6" 4'-0" 9'-3" 8'-111

2" 4'-312" 3'-6" 9'-0" 4'-31

2" 3'-6"

3'-1112" 4'-0" 3'-11" 5'-41

2"10"

3'-6" 4'-0" 3'-11" 5'-412" 5'-01

2" 3'-11" 4'-0" 3'-10" 5'-1" 3'-11" 4'-0" 4'-3"

DN 16R

2'-6"

11'-5"11'-1012" 5'-41

2" 5'-412"

2'-6"

2'-6"2'-6"

13'-2

"2'

-0"

8'-9

1 2"5'

-8"

2'-4

1 2"13

'-51 2"

5'-1

11 2"7'

-31 2"

4'-1

1"

5'-1

11 2"8'

-9"

2'-4

1 2"

13'-5

1 2"4'

-11 2"

3'-5

1 2"

2'-1

1"13

'-3"

2'-0

"8'

-91 2"

5'-8

"2'

-41 2"

2'-4

1 2"15

'-51 2"

5'-1

11 2"7'

-31 2"

2'-1

1"4'

-11 2"

5'-1

11 2"3'

-51 2"

5'-3

1 2"2'

-41 2"

15'-5

1 2"

5'-1

11 2"7'

-31 2"

3'-1

1"4'

-11 2"

5'-1

11 2"3'

-51 2"

5'-3

1 2"2'

-41 2"

14'-5

1 2"

5'-1

11 2"7'

-31 2"

4'-1

1"4'

-11 2"

5'-1

11 2"3'

-51 2"

5'-3

1 2"2'

-41 2"

13'-5

1 2"

14.0

14.0

24.0

24.0

3131

31

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

31

12

12

10

52

17

19

13

1551

30

41 42

17

52

14

12

52

17

19

13

1551

30

41 42

17

52

14

31

12

12

10

52

17

19

13

1551

30

4142

17

52

14

52

17

19

13

1551

30

4142

17

52

14

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

CPT

VCT

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020

FX

2020 FX

2020 FX

2020 FX

2020 FX

NOTE:FIRST FLOOR WINDOW HEAD HEIGHT AT 8'-0" AFFSECOND FLOOR WINDOW HEAD HEIGHT AT 7'-0" AFF

(2) 2650 SH(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

(2) 2650 SH

2020

FX

2020

FX

3040

SH

3040

SH

286826

68

2868

2868

2868

2668

3068

5068 BI-PARTING

2868

2868

2868

2868

2668

5068 BI-PARTING

5068 BI-PARTING

5068 BI-PARTING26

68

2668

286828

68

306830683068

2868

286828

68

2868

2668

2868

2668

2668

2868


DN 16R DN 16R DN 16R

10"

10"

10"

70'-7"21'-101

2" 13'-312" 13'-6" 21'-11"

11'-2" 10'-812" 6'-71

2" 6'-8" 6'-1012" 6'-71

2" 10'-9" 11'-2"

70'-7"5'-0" 13'-1" 5'-0" 12'-4" 12'-01

2" 5'-012" 13'-1" 5'-0"

3'-6" 6'-212" 3'-41

2" 5'-0" 3'-6" 8'-10" 2'-912" 5'-9" 3'-6" 5'-01

2" 3'-412" 6'-21

2" 3'-6" 5'-0"

10" 10" 10"

10"

10"

10"

5'-0

"2'

-11"

3'-0

"3'

-0"

18'-1

1"16

'-01 2"

3'-1

11 2"2'

-0"

52'-1

0"

5'-0

"

1'-0

"

4'-0

"

5'-0

"

5'-0

"3'

-0"

3'-0

"3'

-0"

18'-1

0"16

'-0"

4'-0

"1'

-0"1'

-0"

52'-1

0"

13'-2

"

13'-2

"10

'-91 2"

10'-9

1 2"

13'-2

"10

'-91 2"

12'-8

1 2"10

'-91 2"

SCALE:1 UPPER FLOOR PLAN1/4"=1'-0" -

UPPERFLOORPLAN

2.2INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS








NORTH


Packet Pg. 17

2'-0"

1'-6"

1'-6"

1'-6"

2'-0"

1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"

2'-0"2'-0"

2'-0"

1'-0"

1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6"

1'-0"

2'-0"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

1'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

3'-0

" 1'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"

2'-0

"1

4.0

14.0

24.0

24.0

4'-0

"

8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0"

4'-0

"

4'-0

"

4'-0

"

1'-0

"

4

8

21

1

7

7

3

3

6

5

3

3

5

5

33

3

3

NOTE:ALL ROOF STOPES TO BE 6:12 U.N.O.


ATTIC AREA1,780 SF

ATTIC AREA1,780 SF

5:12

PITC

H

5:12

PITC

H

SCALE:1 ROOF PLAN1/4"=1'-0" -

ROOFPLAN

2.3INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



NORTH

(ALL NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET)ROOF PLAN NOTES

1. RIDGE2. VALLEY3. GUTTER4. ASPHALT SHINGLES5. LINE OF FIRST FLOOR6. LINE OF SECOND FLOOR7. HIP RIDGE8. VENT

ROOF PLAN NOTESX


Packet Pg. 18

TOP OF PLATE

FINISHED FLOOR

FINISHED FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

BUILDING HEIGHT

TOP OF PLATE

FINISHED FLOOR

FINISHED FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

BUILDING HEIGHT

SLOPE GRADEFROM WALK AT1:3 MAX

TEMPERED GLASS

ELECT METERS

SCALE:1 FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH)1/4"=1'-0" -

EXTERIORELEVATIONS

3.0INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



SCALE:2 RIGHT ELEVATION (EAST)1/4"=1'-0" -

(ALL NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET)ELEVATION NOTES

1. SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER - BY BUILDER2. CAST STONE CAP-PROVIDE SLOPE FOR

DRAINAGE3. PRECAST STONE WINDOW SILL.4. OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR, RE: PLAN FOR

SIZE5. TAPERED WOOD BUILT-UP COLUMN RE:6. PROVIDE FLASHING AND DRIP CAP OVER ALL

DOORS, WINDOWS AND AT ALL TRIMTRANSITIONS

7. ENTRY DOOR PER BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS8. RE: STRUCTURAL9. CARRIAGE-TYPE GARAGE DOOR, PAINT TO

MATCH TRIM, OR WOOD STAIN.

1. 1X6 HARDI TRIM FRIEZE2. 1X12 HARDI TRIM-BELLY BAND3. 1X8 HARDI TRIM4. HORIZONTAL SIDING-6" HARDIPLANK LAP

SIDING W/ INDIVIDUAL METAIL CORNER TRIM5. ACCENT SIDING-HARDI SHINGLESIDE SIDING

STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL STYLE6. 1X6 HARDI TRIM7. 1X4 HARDI TRIM8. 1X12 HARDI TRIM9. NOT USED10. 1X2 OVER 1X4 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW SILL11. 1X2 OVER 1X6 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW HEAD

AND SILL12. WOOD BRACKET/CORBEL13. SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT14. BOARD AND BATTAN SIDING 2" BATTANS AT

12" O.C.

1. ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES2. ROOF VENTS - SEE ROOF PLAN FOR

LOCATION AND QUANTITY3. 1X8 HARDI FASCIA (TYPICAL)4. 1X3 SHINGLE STRIP5. PREFINISHED GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS

PER BUILDER6. SOFFIT - HARDI-SOFFIT - VENTED7. LINE OF 3/12 VAULT8. 2X8 RAFTER TAIL ENDS-PAINTED

ROOFING AND MISC. NOTES

SKIN, GLAZING AND LIGHTING NOTES

BASE, COLUMNS AND DOOR OPENINGS

R-

S-

B-


Packet Pg. 19

AC CONDENSOR

TOP OF PLATE

FINISHED FLOOR

FINISHED FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

BUILDING HEIGHT

SLOPE GRADEFROM WALK AT

1:3 MAX

TEMPERED GLASS

ELECT METERS

SCALE:1 REAR ELEVATION (NORTH)1/4"=1'-0" -

EXTERIORELEVATIONS

3.1INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



SCALE:2 LEFT ELEVATION (WEST)1/4"=1'-0" -

(ALL NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET)ELEVATION NOTES





7. ENTRY DOOR PER BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS8. RE: STRUCTURAL9. CARRIAGE-TYPE GARAGE DOOR, PAINT TO

MATCH TRIM, OR WOOD STAIN.

1. 1X6 HARDI TRIM FRIEZE2. 1X12 HARDI TRIM-BELLY BAND3. 1X8 HARDI TRIM4. HORIZONTAL SIDING-6" HARDIPLANK LAP

SIDING W/ INDIVIDUAL METAIL CORNER TRIM5. ACCENT SIDING-HARDI SHINGLESIDE SIDING

STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL STYLE6. 1X6 HARDI TRIM7. 1X4 HARDI TRIM8. 1X12 HARDI TRIM9. NOT USED10. 1X2 OVER 1X4 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW SILL11. 1X2 OVER 1X6 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW HEAD

AND SILL12. WOOD BRACKET/CORBEL13. SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT14. BOARD AND BATTAN SIDING 2" BATTANS AT

12" O.C.



PER BUILDER6. SOFFIT - HARDI-SOFFIT - VENTED7. LINE OF 3/12 VAULT8. 2X8 RAFTER TAIL ENDS-PAINTED

ROOFING AND MISC. NOTES



R-

S-

B-


Packet Pg. 20

TOP OF PLATE

FINISHED FLOOR

9'-1

"1'

-05 8"

FINISHED FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

8'-1

"13

'-83 4"

BUILDING HEIGHT

31'-1

13 8"

6'-5

"RAILPERCODE

3'-0

"

7'-2

"

12'-6"

10'-2

"12

612

6

BATHVINYL9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

STOR'G4'-3" X 2'-6"

CONC

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

FIRE RISERCONC

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

15 TREADS

16 R

ISER

S

1'-6

"

PREMANUFACTUREDROOFTRUSSES

2" RIGIDINSULATION

2" RIGIDINSULATION

PLATFORMHEIGHT

125

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

4" SLAB, SUBGRADE PERSOILSRECOMENDATIONS

2"

3'-0

"6"

5'-1

"6"

9'-1

"

2X RAFTERRE: STRUCT

R-49INSULATION

R-20INSULATION

SOUND BATTSAT MASTERBEDROOMWALL

SOUND BATTSAT MASTERBEDROOMFLOOR

INSULATEFLOORSPACE ABOVEGARAGE

DRAINAGE PER SOILSREPORT

5"

TOP OF PLATE

FINISHED FLOOR

9'-1

"1'

-05 8"

FINISHED FLOOR

TOP OF PLATE

8'-1

"13

'-83 4"

BUILDING HEIGHT

31'-1

13 8"

126

126

126

126

126

126

PREMANUFACTUREDROOFTRUSSES

PREMAN'DROOFTRUSSES

R-49INSULATION

SITTING SHOWER SITTING SHOWER SHOWER SHOWERSITTING SITTING

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

R-20INSULATION



SOUND BATTSAT MASTER

BEDROOMFLOOR

SOUND BATTSAT MASTER

BEDROOMFLOOR

R-13 INSUL'NEA. WALL ATPARTY WALL

ROOF LINE INFOREGROUND

EXTEND PARTITION WALLTO ROOF SHEATHING

EXTENDPARTITIONWALL TO ROOFSHEATHING

EXTEND PARTITIONWALL TO ROOF

SHEATHING

R-20INSULATION

PARTITION WALL WITHSOUND BATTS.

PARTITION WALL WITHSOUND BATTS.

PARTITIONWALL WITHSOUND BATTS.

EXTEND PARTITION WALLTO ROOF SHEATHING ATEAST/WEST GABLE

612

126

PREMAN'DROOF

TRUSSESR-49

INSULATION

PREMAN'DROOFTRUSSESR-49

INSULATION

PREMAN'DROOFTRUSSESR-49

INSULATION

4.0

BUILDINGSECTIONS

SCALE:2 EAST TO WEST ELEVATION1/4"=1'-0" LOOKING SOUTH

INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



SCALE:1 NORTH TO SOUTH ELEVATION1/4"=1'-0" LOOKING WEST

(ALL NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET)SECTION NOTES





7. ENTRY DOOR PER BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS

1. 1X6 HARDI TRIM FRIEZE2. 1X12 HARDI TRIM3. 1X8 HARDI TRIM4. HORIZONTAL SIDING-6" HARDIPLANK LAP

SIDING5. ACCENT SIDING-HARDI SHINGLESIDE SIDING

STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL STYLE6. 1X6 HARDITRIM7. 1X4 HARDITRIM8. 1X12 HARDITRIM9. 20" FRIEZE BOARD AT TOWER10. 1X2 OVER 1X4 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW SILL11. 1X2 OVER 1X6 HARDITRIM AT WINDOW HEAD

AND SILL12. WOOD BRACKET/CORBEL13. SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT



PER BUILDER6. SOFFIT - HARDI-SOFFIT - VENTED7. LINE OF 3/12 VAULT

B-

S-

R- ROOFING AND MISC. NOTES




Packet Pg. 21

11 1/2"=1'-0"

TYPICAL TRIM DETAIL-EXTERIOR 4.1

MISC.DETAILS

21 1/2"=1'-0"

ATTIC ACCESS

31 1/2"=1'-0"

STONE WAINSCOT-SILL

41 1/2"=1'-0"

STONE WAINSCOT

61 1/2"=1'-0"

HEAD DETAIL

51 1/2"=1'-0"

SILL DTL AT SIDING81"=1'-0"

RAILING SECTION

71"=1'-0"

PILASTER DETAILINTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



1x HARDITRIM ATINSIDE CORNER TYPICAL

1x6 HARDBD ATOUTSIDE CORNERTYPICAL

TYPICAL EXTERIORWALL CONSTRUCTION

HARDBD SIDINGOVERBLDG WRAPOVER 7

16" OSB.SHEATHING

R-30 INSULATIONATTACH INSULATIONTO BACK OFACCESS PANEL

12" INSULATION DAM

GYP. BD. CEILING

TRUSSES

GYP. BD. CEILINGPANEL

CAST STONE CAP

VA

RIES

SEE

ELE

V.

G.I. FLASHING

SEALANT

TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL

PRECAST STONE

HARDBOARD SIDINGINSTALLED PER MANUF.SPEC'S

2x6 HARDITRIM-OR OTHERSEE ELEVATIONS

G.I. FLASHING


VINYL WINDOW

BACKER ROD AND SEALANT


VINYL WINDOW


BACKER ROD AND SEALANT


G.I. FLASHING

G.I. FLASHING

VINYLWINDOW


CAST STONE CAP

SYNTHETIC STONE

BACKER ROD ANDSEALANT

DEP

TH P

ERPL

AN

2x4 FRAMING

HARDBDPANEL

STONE VENEER

STONE CAP ABOVE

WIDTH PERPLAN


Packet Pg. 22

WEATHER - RESISITIVE BARRIER

MORTAR JOINT

MORTAR SETTING BED

STUD WALL

STONE VENEER

METAL LATHSCRATCH COAT

INSULATION (WHERE OCCURS)

SHEATHING

WEATHER-RESISITIVE BARRIERSHEATHING

SEALANT

RIGHT ANGLECONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE

MORTAR SETTING BED

STONE VENEER

WAINSCOT

METAL LATH

SIDING

INTERIOR FINISH

METAL FLASHING (GALVANIZED)

INSULATION (STUD WALL)

SIDING

METAL FLASHING

2x WOOD TRIM

DOOR FRAME

BUILDING PAPERSEALANT

ML BEAMS

PAINTED HARDI BOARDTRIM RE: ELEVATIONS

EAVE ANDHI-HEAL

CONDITIONMAY VARY

SEEPLAN

VARI

ES P

ER E

LEV.

2x4 TREATED PLATES.ANCHOR SECURLY TO CONC.

CAST STONECAP

HEADER. SIZE AND LOCATION PERSTRUCTURAL

SEE

ELEV

.

214"

STONE VENEER

1x HARDI TRIMCAP

HARDIPANEL

214"

5/8" G.B. ON 2x4STUDS AT 16" O.C.

WITH BATTINSULATION FOR

SOUND

2 5 1

123

RE: STRUCT FORWALLANCHORAGERE: STRUCT FOR

ADDITIONALSUPPORT

FRAMING FORUPPER WALL

RE: STRUCT FORADDITIONAL

SUPPORTFRAMING FOR

UPPER WALL


WITH BATTINSULATION FOR

SOUND

RE: STRUCT FORWALLANCHORAGE

10"

RUN WALL TOUNDERSIDE OFCLASS 'C' ORBETTER ROOFINGWITH 58" TYPE 'X'G.B. ONUNDERSIDE OFROOF SHEATHING,FIRE CAULK JOINT.

PRE-ENGINEEREDROOF TRUSSES

R-49 BATTINS.

RE: STRUCT FORADD'L SUPPORT

FRAMING FORUPPER WALL.




DRAFT STOP

11 1/2"=1'-0"

TYPICAL TRIM DETAIL-EXTERIOR 4.2

21 1/2"=1'-0"

EXTERIOR TRIM DETAIL

31 1/2"=1'-0"

EXTERIOR TRIM DETAIL

41 1/2"=1'-0"

CRAFTSMAN COLUMNINTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



63/4"=1'-0"

FIRE PARTITION WALL

51"=1'-0"

FIRE PARTITION PLAN DTL

MISC.DETAILS


Packet Pg. 23

ENTRY9' CLG

ENTRY9' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLGBATH

VINYL9' CLG

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG


CONC

ENTRY9' CLG

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

ENTRY9' CLG

FIRE RISERCONC

UNIT (1)1,495 SF

UNIT (2)1,495 SF

UNIT (3)1,495 SF

UNIT (4)1,495 SF

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLGBATH

VINYL9' CLG

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG


CONC

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

BATHVINYL9' CLG

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM

BATHVINYL9' CLG

DINETTE12'-2" X 10'-7"

CARPET9' CLG

LIVINGROOM

17'-0" X 14'-8"CARPET9' CLG


CONC

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

MECH4'-0" X 6'-8"

PLATFORM


CONC

HALL4'-0" x 8'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

KITCHEN12'-2" X 14'-0"

VINYL9' CLG

GARAGE12'-8" X 21'-0"

CONC

AC AC ACAC

SCALE:1 MAIN FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN1/4"=1'-0" -

MAINFLOOR

ELECT PLAN

6.1INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



NORTH

ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS


Packet Pg. 24

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBTHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBATHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBTHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

BEDROOM 117'-0" x 11'-0"

CARPET8' CLG

BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-8"

CARPET8' CLG

LAUNVINYL8' CLG

CLOSET8'-7" x 8'-11"

CARPET8' CLG

BATHVINYL8' CLG

MBATHVINYL8' CLG

HALL-

CARPET8' CLG

SITTING

LINEN

UNIT(1)

UNIT(2)

UNIT(3)

UNIT(4)

SCALE:1 UPPER FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN1/4"=1'-0" -

UPPERFLOOR

ELECT PLAN

6.2INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L C

OPY

RIG

HT

LAW

S PR

OH

IBIT

TH

E U

SE O

F TH

ESE

DRA

WIN

GS

WIT

HO

UT

THE

EXPR

ESS

WRI

TTEN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N O

F TH

E A

RCH

ITEC

T. T

HE

DES

IGN

S C

ON

TAIN

ED W

ITH

IN T

HES

E D

OC

UM

ENTS

BO

TH IN

WH

OLE

AN

D IN

PA

RT A

RE IN

TEN

TED

FO

R C

ON

STRU

CTI

ON

AT

THE

AD

DRE

SS L

ISTE

D O

N T

HE

TITL

E BL

OC

K.

ISSUED FOR: DATE:

-

SUNSTONE4-PLEX

SUN

STO

NE

4-PL

EXST

ON

EY C

REEK

DRI

VE

AN

D C

ARI

BOU

DRI

VE



TOTAL 1,496 SF

GARAGE AND

UNIT AREAUNITS 1-4

MECHANICAL343 SF

LOT

13 S

UN

STO

NE

MU

LTI-U

SEFO

RT C

OLL

INS,

CO

LORA

DO




SCH ARCHITECTS



NORTH

ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS


Packet Pg. 25

ITEM 2, EXHIBIT A Appellant Bio - Submitted at Hearing

Packet Pg. 25-1


Packet Pg. 25-2


Packet Pg. 25-3


Packet Pg. 25-4


Packet Pg. 25-5


Packet Pg. 25-6

Agenda Item 3

Item 3, Page 1

Staff Report February 28, 2019 Building Review Board STAFF Russ Hovland, Chief Building Official SUBJECT PROPOSED BUILDING CODE CHANGES TO REQUIRE MIXED CONSTRUCTION AND DEMO WASTE BE SENT TO NEW COUNTY RECYCLE SORTING FACILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary: Honore Depew, Sr. Sustainability Specialist for Waste Reduction & Recycling, will present the details of a proposed ordinance to amend the I-codes to help divert construction and demolition debris (C&D) and enable the construction of a new C&D sorting facility. This item will be considered for first reading by City Council at the March 5 regular meeting. Action Requested: Feedback from the BRB will be provided to Council in a read-before memo, or the BRB may choose to send a memo directly to City Council. Details of the proposed code change:

• All co-mingled loads of C&D trash and recycling debris from building sites would have to go to a specific, County-owned facility.

• Although the building code would change now, the requirement would only be triggered by an operational facility (expected 2022).

• Requirement would be in effect for ten years from when the new facility begins accepting materials. • Code change would apply to the same sizes and types of projects as current recycling requirements. • New system would provide the convenience of “all in one bin” collection service. • Options still remain; separating recyclables on site would be permissible under code amendments.

Staff recommendation: Because the details of how Fort Collins policy can trigger new County facility development only became clear in the last month, these proposed building code amendments were not considered during the 2018 building code update cycle. Staff recommends supporting this code amendment to the adopted 2018 IRC and IBC which will require the C&D waste in mixed containers be brought to the new county facility when operational. Board or Commission may:

• Vote in support or non-support of this code change. • Give input to the Chief Building Official which may include recommending changes this code amendment

proposal. • Do nothing.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Staff Presentation

Packet Pg. 26

1

Staff Report to Building Review BoardRegional Wasteshed Project

Honore Depew; Sustainability Services

2-28-19

Subject

March 5 Regular Meeting: • City Council will be considering an ordinance to amend the building

codes to require all mixed loads of construction and demolition wastebe sent to a future County-owned sorting facility, once it isconstructed (2022, expected).

1. Does the BRB have specific feedback on the proposed changes?2. Would the BRB like that feedback delivered by staff or by direct

memo to Council?

2

1

2


Packet Pg. 27

3

Strategic Plan Goals Impacted

3.2 Maintain and grow diverse employment opportunities

4.5 Achieve the 2020 Road to Zero Waste goals and work toward 2030 zero waste goals

4.1 Achieve Climate Action Plan (CAP) 2020 goals and continue progress toward the 2030 goals

2016 Landfill Waste - Fort Collins

4

3

4


Packet Pg. 28

Wasteshed Coalition

TACTechnical Advisory

Committee

PACPolicy Advisory

Committee

Stakeholder Advisory Group

5

Master Plan For Solid Waste

Infrastructure

Stakeholder Engagement

6

• Stakeholder Advisory Group• 50+ Diverse Members• 7 Meetings over 10 Months• Strong Support for Coalition

Recommendations

• Multiple Meetings with:• Private Haulers• Fort Collins Chamber

• Four 2018 Open Houses• Regional Elected Officials’ Meetings

5

6


Packet Pg. 29

Larimer County Capital Investments

7

• Over $50 million invested

• No tax revenue needed

• No capital expenditure from Fort Collins

• Potential to address 75%+ of our landfilled waste

New Landfill

Central Transfer Station

Yard Waste Composting Facility

Construction & Demolition Debris Processing Facility

Food Waste Composting Facility

Recycling Center Improvement

8

• Obligations of Larimer County: • Fund, build, own, and manage new facilities

• Obligations of All Parties:• Consider code changes for solid waste• Participate in a solid waste Policy Council • Coordinate data tracking and education

• IGA does not obligate Fort Collins to enact new policy

Intergovernmental Agreement

7

8


Packet Pg. 30

Code Changes Needed in Fort Collins to Enable Construction

9

New Landfill None

Central Transfer Station None

Yard Waste Composting Facility None

Recycling Center Improvement Flow Control • for curbside “single stream” recyclables

Food Waste Composting Facility Local policy needed; no flow control

Construction & Demolition (C&D) Debris Sorting Facility

Flow Control• for mixed loads of C&D debris

Landfilled Construction Debris

Recyclable

52%Compostable

27%

Not Currently Recyclable

21%

Fort Collins Landfilled Industrial/Construction Waste

10

• Represents 33% of progress needed to meet 2025 Zero Waste diversion goal

9

10


Packet Pg. 31

Mixed loads of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris must be delivered to County-owned facility, for a period of 10 years

Proposed Flow Control Ordinance

11

Proposed Flow Control Ordinance

12

• Would go into effect once new facility is built• Aligns with current construction site recycling standards• Offers “all-in-one-bin” service for jobsite convenience• Positive feedback from builders and roll-off haulers

11

12


Packet Pg. 32

Next Steps

March 5 Regular Meeting: • City Council will be considering an ordinance to amend the building

codes to require all mixed loads of construction and demolition waste be sent to a future County-owned sorting facility, once it is constructed (2022, expected).

1. Does the BRB have specific feedback on the proposed changes?2. Would the BRB like that feedback delivered by staff or by direct

memo to Council?

13Honore Depew, Sr. Sustainability Specialist for Waste Reduction & Recycling; [email protected] (970) 221-6604

Additional Slides

link

13

14


Packet Pg. 33

Code Changes Needed in Fort Collins to Enable Construction

15

New Landfill None

Central Transfer Station None

Yard Waste Composting Facility None

Recycling Center Improvement Flow Control • for curbside “single stream” recyclables

Food Waste Composting Facility Local policy needed; no flow control

Construction & Demolition (C&D) Debris Sorting Facility

Flow Control• for mixed loads of C&D debris

Regional WasteshedResource Recovery Center (Proposed)

16

New Landfill

Construction & Demolition Debris Sorting

Food Waste Composting

Recycling Center Upgrades

Intersection Improvement

Transfer Station

Yard Waste Composting

15

16


Packet Pg. 34

Facility Build Timeline

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Central Transfer Station

New County Landfill

Yard Waste CompostingOpen Windrow

Construction and Demolition Debris Processing

Food Waste Composting Aerated Static Piles

17

Proposed Facilities

18

RECYCLING CENTER UPGRADES

CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS PROCESSING FACILITY

17

18


Packet Pg. 35

Proposed Facilities

19

NEW LANDFILLCENTRAL TRANSFER STATION

Proposed Facilities

20

FOOD WASTE COMPOSTING FACILITY

YARD WASTE COMPOSTING FACILITY

19

20


Packet Pg. 36

Estimated Tipping Fees

21

Facility Cost per ton

Current Landfill $22

Transfer Station: Trash $29

Compost: Yard $38

Compost: Food $38

Construction Debris $37

Larimer County Capital Investments

22

Facility Initial Capital

New Landfill $11.7M

Central Transfer Station $15.8M

Recycling Center Upgrades $3.0M

Yard & Food WasteComposting Facilities

$11.8M

Construction & Demolition Debris Processing Facility

$13.7M

Total: $56MNo tax revenue used

No capital expenditure from City

21

22


Packet Pg. 37

Larimer County Landfill:Remaining Air Space

23

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

Air S

pace

Rem

aini

ng (c

ubic

yar

ds)

2004 Final Expansion

Wasteshed Coalition Goals

1. Establish regional materials management system• 390k tons landfilled/year (2017); 540k tons/year by 2025• Proposed system would divert ~40%

2. Implement programs and facilities• Five facilities and supportive policies recommended

3. Develop waste diversion/reduction goals for all jurisdictions• 40% by 2025 for total material currently received at facility

4. Conduct strong, consistent public education and outreach• Part of proposed Hauler Licensing and Intergovernmental Agreement

23

24


Packet Pg. 38

Council-Adopted Goals

25

GHG emissions 20% below 2005 levels

GHG emissions 80% below 2005 levels

90% diversion

2.8 lbs/person landfilled per day

Carbon Neutral

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030 2050

Road to Zero Waste Goals Adopted

75% diversion

Approaching Zero Waste

Climate Action Goals Adopted

26

25

26


Packet Pg. 39

27

27


Packet Pg. 40

Agenda Item 4

Item 4, Page 1

Staff Report February 28, 2019 Building Review Board STAFF Russ Hovland, Chief Building Official SUBJECT PROPOSED BUILDING CODE CHANGE TO ALLOW SHORT-TERM RENTALS IN MULTI-FAMILY BUILDINGS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary: Building Services and Poudre Fire Authority have identified a short term rental (STR) licensing policy that conflicts with current Building and Fire codes adopted by the City. In 2008, Fort Collins adopted the 2006 International Building Code. That code established transient dwellings and non-transient dwellings as two different occupancies: R-1 for hotel/motel transient occupancy and R-2 for non-transient multi-family condo/apartment occupancy. Since that time these have been identified as different occupancies and have different code requirements. Short term rentals (30 day stay or less) located within a multi-family building (3 units or more) is a change to transient R-1 use/occupancy. To change building code occupancies, the IBC requires the building must be modified with a building permit to meet the new code requirements required for that occupancy. Transient dwellings like hotels are required to be safer because transient occupants are less familiar with the building layout and emergency safety measures than permanent residents. Transient occupancies have higher, more stringent building code standards including fire safety (fire sprinkler systems), egress, accessibility, elevators, and electrical.

The City has approved approximately 88 STR licenses in multi-family buildings, but a full change of occupancy process would be very expensive to make some of these buildings code compliant. Staff recommendation: The Chief Building Official (CBO) recommends adding language to the occupancy description section of Chapter 3 in the adopted 2018 IBC to allow R-2 multi-family buildings to have not more than 25% of units/dwellings with occupants that are transient in nature thereby keeping the primary use of the building permanent residents. The building would then not be considered a change occupancy. City staff will be presenting this change to City Council on March 26. Board or Commission may:

• Vote in support or non-support of this code change. • Give input to the CBO which may include recommending changes this code amendment proposal. • Do nothing.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Amendment to section 310.3 of the 2018 IBC.

Packet Pg. 41

Draft #4 Fort Collins Amendments to the 2018 International Building Code

The 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE adopted herein is hereby amended in the following respects:

SECTION 310 RESIDENTIAL GROUP R

310.1 Residential Group R. Residential Group R includes, among others, the use of a building or structure, or a portion thereof, for sleeping purposes when not classified as an Institutional Group I or when not regulated by the International Residential Code.

310.2 Residential Group R-1. Residential Group R-1 occupancies containing sleeping units where the occupants are primarily transient in nature, including:

Boarding houses (transient) with more than 10 occupants Congregate living facilities (transient) with more than 10 occupants Hotels (transient) Motels (transient)

310.3 Residential Group R-2. Residential Group R-2 occupancies containing sleeping units or more than two dwelling units where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature, including:

Apartment houses Apartment houses where a maximum of 25% of the units/dwellings include occupants that are transient in nature. A three unit R-2 building is allowed to have one unit/dwelling with occupants that are transient in nature.

Congregate living facilities (nontransient) with more than 16 occupants Boarding houses (nontransient) Convents Dormitories Fraternities and sororities Monasteries Hotels (nontransient) Live/work units Motels (nontransient) Vacation timeshare properties


Packet Pg. 42

regular hearing agenda february 28, 2019

Documents