regulating private hospitals
DESCRIPTION
Regulating private hospitals. Professor EK Yeoh. Harding-Preker Framework. Assessment. Strategy. Grow. Issues and Goals. Focus. Harness. Convert. Distribution (equity) Efficiency Quality of Care. PHSA Gather available information Identify additional needs In-depth studies. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Regulating private hospitals
Professor EK Yeoh
Harding-Preker Framework
•Distribution(equity)
•Efficiency
•Quality of Care
Source: Adapted from Harding & Preker, Private Participation in Health Services, 2003.
PHSA•Gather available
information
•Identify additional needs
•In-depth studies
PHSA•Gather available
information
•Identify additional needs
•In-depth studiesActivities• Hospitals• PHC• Diagnostic labs• Producers / Distributors
Ownership• For-profit corporate • For-profit small
business• Non-profit charitable
Formal/ Informal
Activities• Hospitals• PHC• Diagnostic labs• Producers / Distributors
Ownership• For-profit corporate • For-profit small
business• Non-profit charitable
Formal/ Informal
Grow
Harness
Convert
StrategyStrategyAssessmentAssessmentIssues and GoalsIssues and Goals
InstrumentsInstruments
FocusFocus
Private SectorPrivate Sector
PublicSectorPublicSector
Policy Tools• Regulation• Contracting• Training/Info• Social marketing• Social franchising• Info. to patients• Demand-side • (incl. Vouchers)• PPP transactions• Enable environment
improvement
Policy Tools• Regulation• Contracting• Training/Info• Social marketing• Social franchising• Info. to patients• Demand-side • (incl. Vouchers)• PPP transactions• Enable environment
improvement
Harding-Preker Framework
•Distribution(equity)
•Efficiency
•Quality of Care
Source: Adapted from Harding & Preker, Private Participation in Health Services, 2003.
PHSA•Gather available
information
•Identify additional needs
•In-depth studies
PHSA•Gather available
information
•Identify additional needs
•In-depth studiesActivities• Hospitals• PHC• Diagnostic labs• Producers / Distributors
Ownership• For-profit corporate • For-profit small
business• Non-profit charitable
Formal/ Informal
Activities• Hospitals• PHC• Diagnostic labs• Producers / Distributors
Ownership• For-profit corporate • For-profit small
business• Non-profit charitable
Formal/ Informal
Convert
StrategyStrategy
Policy Tools• Regulation• Contracting• Training/Info• Social marketing• Social franchising• Info. to patients• Demand-side • (incl. Vouchers)• PPP transactions• Enable environment
improvement
Policy Tools• Regulation• Contracting• Training/Info• Social marketing• Social franchising• Info. to patients• Demand-side • (incl. Vouchers)• PPP transactions• Enable environment
improvement
AssessmentAssessmentIssues and GoalsIssues and Goals
InstrumentsInstruments
FocusFocus
Private SectorPrivate Sector
PublicSectorPublicSector
Grow
Harness
Regulation
Outline for Presentation• Define regulations• Regulatory strategies and instruments• Regulating quality
– Compliance-based– Incentive-based– Self-regulation
• Regulatory regime and effectiveness• Key Messages• Further Reading and References
Regulation
• Regulation as setting forth mandatory rules that are enforced by a state agency
• Regulation incorporates all efforts by state agencies to steer the economy… include state ownership and contracting, taxation and disclosure requirements
• Regulation to include all mechanisms of both intentional and unintentional social control
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Baldwin et al (1998)
Three basic categories
Regulation
• Regulation is the range of factors exterior to the practice or administration of medical care that influences behaviour in delivering health care
Brennan and Berwick (1996)
Dimensions [Purposes] of health sector regulation
Policy Objectives • Normative and value driven• Broad public interest• Specific policy goals [ends and objectives]
Managerial mechanisms
• Specific regulatory mechanisms to attain policy objectives
• Technical in nature, emphasis on efficient and effective management of human and financial resources
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Social and economic policy objectives
• Equity and justice• Social cohesion• Economic efficiency• Health and safety• Informed and educated citizens• Individual choice
Harding and Preker (2003)
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Health sector management mechanisms
• Regulating quality and effectiveness• Regulating patient access• Regulating provider behaviour• Regulating payers• Regulating pharmaceuticals• Regulating physicians
Harding and Preker (2003)
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Regulatory strategy• Command and control• Self regulation• Incentive-based regimes• Market harnessing controls• Disclosure• Direct action• Rights and liabilities laws• Public compensation and social insurance
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Actors
• Government• Professional/ provider organizations• Patients’/ Consumers’ organizations
Regulatory actors
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Baldwin and Cave (1999)
• self-regulators tend to be strong on specialist knowledge but weak on accountability to the public;
• local authorities strong on local democratic accountability,weak on coordination;
• parliament strong on democratic authority, weak on sustained scrutiny;
• courts and tribunals strong on fairness, weak on planning;• central departments strong on coordination with the
government, weak on neutrality; • agencies strong on expertise and combining functions, weak
on neutrality; • directors general strong on specialization and identification of
responsibility, weak on spreading discretionary powers.
Targets
• Quality• Capacity• Price• Market structure and levels of services• Entitlements
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Regulatory instruments• Control-based regulation
– Licensing– Registration
• Incentive-based regulation– Contracts– Accreditation
• Market-structure regulation– Encourage desired behaviour
Harding and Preker (2003)
Control-based regulatory instrument
Harding and Preker (2003)
Area Method of regulation
Application Target
Healthcare facilities
Facility licensing Operation of new facility Minimum facility structure
Certificate of need programs
New facility constructionor facility expansion
Community need for service Resource allocation
Health maps (carte sanitaire)
Health planning anddistribution of healthfacilities
Efficient distribution ofhealth facilities
Health system agencies
New facility constructionor facility expansion
Rationalization of capitalinvestment
Antitrust regulation Relationship betweenproviders
Price and quality of services
Facility accreditation Facility structure andperformance
Quality of services
Control-based regulatory instrument
Harding and Preker (2003)
Area Method of regulation Application Target
Healthcare personnel
Licensing Minimum qualifications Quality of services
Primary and specialty certification
Specialized competence Quality of services
Recertification Maintained competence Quality of services
Practice guidelinesand outcomes research
Clinical practice Quality of services
Professional standardsreview organizations
Utilization review Quality of servicesCost of care
Peer revieworganizations
Utilization review Quality of servicesCost of care
Fines, penalties andsanctions
Provider compliance withregulation
Varied
Incentive-based regulatory instrument
Harding and Preker (2003)
Financial Incentives
Capital markets• Provide government loans at low interest.• Provide government guarantees for borrowing on private markets.• Improve access to low-cost credit and simplified loan application processes.• Provide access to foreign currency.
Taxes and tariffs• Introduce tax waivers, exemptions, and deductibles.• Provide favorable tariffs and duty-free imports of medical equipment and supplies.
Other subsidies• Give direct government subsidies targeted to public health objectives.• Provide government grants targeted to public health objectives.
Provider payment• Ensure appropriate provider payment mechanisms.• Assure reasonable profit margins (if prices are controlled by the government).• Pay government obligations to providers in a timely manner.• Protect overdrafts in response to government payment delays.• Give bonuses to serve in underserved areas.
Incentive-based regulatory instrument
Harding and Preker (2003)
Nonfinancial Incentives
Regulatory environment• Improve ease of entry to the market.• Improve regulatory processes and reduce bureaucratic controls.• Disseminate information on regulations and laws.• Confer legal authority to transform public providers into public corporations.
Market and business environment• Purchase selectively.• Provide referral systems with the public sector.• Grant access to use government facilities and equipment.• Provide consumer and market information.• Support development of an adequately skilled work force.
Human resource development• Offer training and professional development opportunities in needed specialties.• Improve career path for specialties that are in short supply.
Public-private sector relations• Assure clarity and predictability of provider-performance expectations.• Promote public and private sector provider dialogue.• Formal partnership where appropriate (such as engage private providers in public health programs).
Regulatory instruments by regulatory strategy and target of regulation
Harding and Preker (2003)
Target of regulation/ regulatory strategy
Controls Incentives
Indirect regulatory instruments (aimed at the input-provider interface)
Capital funding • Regulation of capital markets• Mechanisms for allocating public funds (such as
contracting, prospective/ retrospective reimbursement)
• Government low-interest loans• Government guarantees for borrowing
on private markets
Manpower • Control of medical school admissions• Pay scales for public managerial personnel
• Accreditation of educational institutions
Facilities, equipment, and supplies
• Import restrictions• Global budgets• Testing requirements and quality controls on production
of equipment and supplies
• Health system agencies• Duty-free imports of medical equipment
and supplies
Technology/ knowledge • National health technology agencies/advisory panels • Research funding
Direct regulatory instruments (aimed at the provider-consumer interface)
Price of services • Rate setting and price controls • Government subsidies
Health system capacity (quantity and distribution of services)
• Certificate of need programs• Health maps
• Bonuses to serve in undeserved areas
Quality of services • Registration/licensing requirements• Practice guidelines• Medical technology/equipment safety acts
• Voluntary facility accreditation• Personnel credentialing
Combinations of the above targets
• Fines , penalties, and sanctions• Antitrust law (to control prices and quality of services).• Professional standards review organizations and peer review organizations (to control cost and quality of services)
• Tax laws (to influence volume and price of private provision
• Provider-payment schemes (can influence volume and quality of services)Harding and Preker
(2003)
Self-regulation• A state-generated mandate that allows certain
professionals or enterprises to set standards for the behaviour of its membership– Private self-regulation without state enforcement
e.g. some professional organisations or voluntary organisations
– Publicly mandated self-regulation e.g. professional self-regulation by physicians, dentists and pharmacists, etc.
– Joint self-regulation with non-governmental actors
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Baldwin and Cave (1999)
Self-regulationAdvantages Disadvantages
High commitment to ownership of rules Self-serving
Well-informed rule making Impetus toward monopolistic behaviour
Low costs to government Command and control problems cannot always be avoided
Close fit of regulatory standards with those seen as reasonable by actors
Exclusion of public from rule-making procedures
Potential for rapid adjustment Enforcement bias toward industry
Enforcement and complaints procedures potentially more effective
Public distrust of enforcers
Potential for combining with external oversight
Problematic legal oversight
Public preference for governmental responsibility
Harding and Preker (2003)
Baldwin and Cave (1999)
Regulatory body in Hong Kong
• The Medical Council of Hong Kong• Hong Kong Academy of Medicine• Hong Kong Hospital Authority
The Medical Council of Hong Kong
Empowered by the Medical Registration Ordinance, Cap. 161, Laws of Hong Kong, the Medical Council maintains a register of eligible medical practitioners, administers the Licensing Examination, issues guidelines and a Professional Code and Conduct, exercises regulatory and disciplinary powers for the profession, and answers general enquiries from doctors and the public.
http://www.mchk.org.hk
The Medical Council of Hong Kong• Standards of practice
– Licensing– Entry to the professions– Re-certification not required– Continuing medical education not required– Clinical audit and quality assurance not required
• Accreditation of specialties• Code of practices and ethics
The Medical Council of Hong Kong
• 24 medical members, 4 lay members• Preliminary Investigation Committee• Licentiate Committee• Education and Accreditation Committee• Ethics Committee• Health Committee
Hong Kong Academy of Medicine (HKAM)
In recognition of the need for essential postgraduate medical education and training in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine was formally established under the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Ordinance (Cap 419) with the statutory power to organise, monitor, assess and accredit all medical specialist training and to oversee the provision of continuing medical education.
http://www.hkam.org.hk
Role of HKAM
• To maintain the standard of specialist training and specialist continuing medical education (CME) and continuous professional development (CPD) in the territory
• To assists the Medical Council of Hong Kong, the Registration body, in the maintenance of the Specialist Register (SR) since its inception in 1997 (Medical Registration Ordinance)
Specialist training
• Standard 6-year format for basic and higher specialist training leading to Fellowship
• Examinations and assessment• Require continuing medical education and
continuous professional development to maintain specialist status
Hong Kong Hospital Authority
• Public hospitals were corporatized in 1991 under the holding of a single statutory nonprofit public corporation, the Hospital Authority, independent of the government bureaucracy and established with the mandate to manage all public hospitals.
http://www.ha.org.hk
30
Hong Kong Hospital AuthorityUnder the Hospital Authority Ordinance, the Hospital Authority is responsible for:
– Advising the Government on the needs of the public for hospital services and of the resources required to meet those needs;
– Managing and developing the public hospital system; – Recommending to the Secretary for Food and Health
appropriate policies on fees for the use of hospital services by the public;
– Establishing public hospitals; – Managing and controlling public hospitals; and – Promoting, assisting and taking part in education and training
of persons involved in hospital or related services.
Management structure
Functions:• Clinical effectiveness and
technology management• Patient safety and risk
management • Patient relations and
engagement • Quality and Standards• Infection, emergency and
contingency • Chief Infection Control
Office • Infectious Disease Control
Training Centre
Quality assurance/ clinical audit
• Monitoring, audit and inspection• Implement pilot hospital accreditation
program, which includes defining the quality of hospital services in line with international standards and review by an international accrediting agent
• Key performance indicators• Satisfaction survey
Regulating quality
• Structure– Facility licensing– Healthcare personnel licensing
• Process– Facility accreditation– Clinical practice guideline
• Outcome– Performance reporting– Clinical audit
Complementary/ synthetic role of regulatory instrument
• Licensing/ professional standards– Compliance/ control based– Self-regulatory
• Specialist practice– Self-regulatory– Non-financial incentive-based
A framework for comprehensive regulatory assessment
Overall countryprofile
Political economy
Demographic andhealth indicators
• Political ideology• Culture, values, and norms• Interrelationship or power balance between stakeholders• Per capita income level
• Demographic data• Literacy rates• Health status
Existing or potentialcapacity for regulation
Overall healthsector structure
Current regulatorysystem
Governmentcapacity
• Provider mix and extent and forms of private provision• Breadth of insurance coverage: public, private• Health care utilization indicators
• Status of current health care regulation• Effectiveness of current regulation in encouraging private participation and ensuring
desirable performance• Information systems, ease of data collection, and ability to process data efficiently
• Organizational structure• Level of government• Technical capacity to perform regulatory functions (set standards, monitor, evaluate
and enforce)• Availability of trained personnel• Funding (public and private)
Harding and Preker (2003)
Regulatory decision-makingIs the issue correctly defined?
Is government action justified?
Is regulation the best form of government action?
Is there a legal basis for regulation?
What is the appropriate level of government for this action?
Do the benefits of regulation justify the costs?
Is the distribution of effects across society transparent?
Is the regulation clear, consistent, comprehensible and accessible?
Have all interested parties had the opportunity to present their views?
How will compliance be achieved?
OECD (2002)
Regulatory activity
• Legislation• Implementation• Monitoring• Evaluation• Enforcement• Judicial supervision
Saltman and Busse (2002)
Regulating legitimacy• Acceptability
– Political– Social– Regulated
• Process– Communication– Transparency
• Independent creditability of regulatory body• Legal foundation
Regulation
Regulatory cycleDecide to regulate
Secure legal authority
Write rules
Monitor compliance
Impose penalties for
violators
Evaluate system
performance
Peter Berman
Key Messages• Regulations is an inherently complex and political
process.• Regulation is a strategic, dynamic and on-going
process.• Control/Compliance based regulations needs to be
complemented with other instruments (e.g. (purchasing, self-regulations) to be effective.
• Legitimacy and wide awareness of quality regulations are critical for effectiveness.
Reading and References• Busse R, Hafez-Afifi N and Harding A (2000). “Chapter 4:
Regulation of Health Services.” Private Participation in Health Services Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank
• Saltman R, Busse R and Mossialos Elias (2002). European Observatory on Health Care Systems Series: Regulating entrepreneurial behaviour in European health care systems. Open University Press. World Health Organization
• http://www.ps4h.org/hospital_documents• http://www.ps4h.org/Bali_documents