reit - both benefits and costs

2
PROPERTY 60 today Friday Fe bruary 24, 2012  tan Chin Keong R ecent newspaper articles have increasingly laid blame on real estate invest- ment trusts (REITs) for the rising occupancy costs in retail and industrial properties. In fact, in my earlier ar- ticle in this newspaper titled “Hawker centres and REITs: An inflation face-off?” (Nov 25, REITs: Both benefits and costs CoMMentary 2011), I also highlighted that REITs, in their relentless pursuit of superior shareholder returns, have generally been very proac- tive and efficient in raising the rental rates of their investment properties. This is in the best interests of REIT shareholders; unfortunately, it also results in higher rental costs, which eventually filter through to the inflation basket. However, while poten- tially resulting in higher in- flation, REITs also have their benefits. And having followed the Singapore REIT sector since its birth in 2002, I feel it is my responsibility to also highlight such benefits. First, the introduction of REITs has provided a cost-ef- fective way for investors, espe- cially the retail investors, to gain exposure in a pool of diversified commercial or industrial prop- erties. Before REITs were intro- duced, ordinary investors were largely shut out of commercial and industrial real estate due to the generally large amount of capital involved. REITs have helped to attract retail money into these previously inacces- sible property sectors, thus ex- panding the investment options of ordinary Singaporeans. This, in turn, has boosted the supply of commercial and industrial properties in Singa- pore. Even if REITs mainly pur- chase existing buildings from property developers, they ef- fectively free up capital in the property developers, who then gain the incentive to build new commercial and industrial buildings. In fact, many property developers who are large REIT sponsors in Singapore, have been recycling the capital they generate from the sales of their investment properties to their sponsored REITs to build new retail properties. This helps to create a more vibrant retail mall scene in Singapore. One might even say REITs have helped to boost Singapore’s profile as a tourist and commercial hub. Second, REITs also help to improve the quality of exist- ing commercial and industrial buildings. Due to their focus on shareholder returns, REITs are normally very active in en- hancing the premises, facilities and services of their investment properties whenever the op- portunity arises. This has result- ed in better quality investment properties (especially the retail malls) that are more exciting to visit. For example, many retail malls (such as Plaza Singapura and IMM Building) have been successfully refurbished and enhanced by their REIT owners. Last but not least, the Sin- gapore REIT sector was cre- ated to provide an additional high-yielding financial instru- ment for Singaporeans to in- vest their savings in order to secure a steady income upon retirement. This is especially important given Singapore’s ageing society. The sector has developed well over the past decade with more than 20 REITs being listed currently, offering investment opportunities into different investment property asset classes. In fact, the Sin- gapore REIT sector is currently the second-largest in Asia, just behind Japan, another ageing society. Thus, like in most situa- tions, the case for or against REITs is not a straightforward one as it entails both social and financial benefits and costs. I guess the key question is wheth- er Singapore as a society values the social and financial benefits of REITs more than its costs.  ¢ Tan Chin Keong is an analyst at UBS Wealth M ms, sc s Pz Sp, v sccssf fs c reit ws. blooMberg

Upload: pierregunadi

Post on 02-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/10/2019 REIT - Both Benefits and Costs

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reit-both-benefits-and-costs 1/1

PROPERTY

60today Friday Fe bruary 24, 2012

 tan Chin Keong

R ecent newspaper articles

have increasingly laid

blame on real estate invest-

ment trusts (REITs) for the

rising occupancy costs in retail

and industrial properties.

In fact, in my earlier ar-

ticle in this newspaper titled

“Hawker centres and REITs:

An inflation face-off?” (Nov 25,

REITs: Both benefits and costs

CoMMentary

2011), I also highlighted that

REITs, in their relentless pursuit

of superior shareholder returns,

have generally been very proac-

tive and efficient in raising the

rental rates of their investment

properties. This is in the best

interests of REIT shareholders;

unfortunately, it also results

in higher rental costs, which

eventually filter through to the

inflation basket.

However, while poten-

tially resulting in higher in-

flation, REITs also have their

benefits. And having followed

the Singapore REIT sector since

its birth in 2002, I feel it is my

responsibility to also highlight

such benefits.

First, the introduction of

REITs has provided a cost-ef-

fective way for investors, espe-

cially the retail investors, to gain

exposure in a pool of diversified

commercial or industrial prop-

erties. Before REITs were intro-

duced, ordinary investors were

largely shut out of commercial

and industrial real estate due

to the generally large amount

of capital involved. REITs have

helped to attract retail money

into these previously inacces-

sible property sectors, thus ex-

panding the investment options

of ordinary Singaporeans.

This, in turn, has boosted

the supply of commercial and

industrial properties in Singa-

pore. Even if REITs mainly pur-

chase existing buildings from

property developers, they ef-

fectively free up capital in the

property developers, who then

gain the incentive to build new

commercial and industrial

buildings. In fact, many property

developers who are large REIT

sponsors in Singapore, have

been recycling the capital they

generate from the sales of their

investment properties to their

sponsored REITs to build new

retail properties. This helps to

create a more vibrant

scene in Singapore.

even say REITs have

boost Singapore’s p

tourist and commer

Second, REITs a

improve the qualit

ing commercial and

buildings. Due to t

on shareholder retu

are normally very ac

hancing the premise

and services of their i

properties whenev

portunity arises. This

ed in better quality i

properties (especiall

malls) that are more

visit. For example, m

malls (such as Plaza

and IMM Building)

successfully refurb

enhanced by their RE

Last but not lea

gapore REIT sector

ated to provide an

high-yielding financ

ment for Singapore

vest their savings i

secure a steady inc

retirement. This is

important given Si

ageing society. The

developed well ove

decade with more tha

being listed currentl

investment opportu

different investmen

asset classes. In fac

gapore REIT sector i

the second-largest i

behind Japan, anoth

society.

Thus, like in m

tions, the case for

REITs is not a straig

one as it entails both

financial benefits a

guess the key questio

er Singapore as a soc

the social and financ

of REITs more than i

Tan Chin Keong

analyst at UBS W

M ms, scs PzSp,v sccssffsc reitws.blooMberg