relation between tmds and pdfs in the covariant parton model approach
DESCRIPTION
Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach. Petr Z a vada Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Rep. (based on collaboration and discussions with A.Efremov, P.Schweitzer and O.Teryaev). TRANSVERSITY 2011 Third International Workshop on TRANSVERSE POLARIZATION - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Relation between TMDs and PDFsin the covariant parton model approach
Petr ZavadaInstitute of Physics, Prague, Czech Rep.
TRANSVERSITY 2011Third International Workshop onTRANSVERSE POLARIZATION
PHENOMENA IN HARD SCATTERING29 August - 2 September 2011
Veli Losinj, Croatia
(based on collaboration and discussionswith A.Efremov, P.Schweitzer and O.Teryaev)
![Page 2: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline 3D covariant parton model PDF-TMD relations TMDs: numerical predictions general comment on DIS kinematics summary
![Page 3: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3D covariant parton model
Model of non-interacting quarks fulfils the requirements of Lorentz invariance & rotational symmetry of (3D) quark momentum distribution in the nucleon rest frame.
Model implies relations and rules: between 3D distributions and structure functions between structure functions themselves
For example: WW relation, sum rules WW, BC, ELT; helicity↔transversity, transversity↔pretzelosity,... Relations between different TMDs, recently also TMDs↔PDFs
See our recent paper and citations therein: A.Efremov, P.Schweitzer, O.Teryaev and P.Z., Phys.Rev.D 83, 054025(2011)
![Page 4: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
TMDs(Transverse Momentum Dependent parton distributions)
light-front correlators
[A.Efremov, P.Schweitzer, O.Teryaev and P.Z. Phys.Rev.D 80, 014021(2009)]
![Page 5: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PDF-TMD relations1. UNPOLARIZED
For details see: P.Z. Phys.Rev.D 83, 014022 (2011)A.Efremov, P.Schweitzer, O.Teryaev and P.Z. Phys.Rev.D 83, 054025(2011)
The same relation was obtained indepedently:U. D’Alesio, E. Leader and F. Murgia, Phys.Rev. D 81, 036010 (2010)
In this talk we assume m→0
![Page 6: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PDF-TMD relations2. POLARIZED
Known f1(x), g1(x) allow us to predict unknown TMDs
![Page 7: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Numerical results:pT/M
q(x)0.100.130.20
x
0.150.180.220.30
pT/Mx
Input for f1 (x)
MRST LO at 4 GeV2
Another model approaches to TMDs give compatible results:1. U. D’Alesio, E. Leader and F. Murgia, Phys.Rev. D 81, 036010 (2010)2. C.Bourrely, F.Buccellla, J.Soffer, Phys.Rev. D 83, 074008 (2011)
![Page 8: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
X0.150.180.220.30
Gaussian shape – is supported by phenomenology <pT
2> depends on x , is smaller for sea quarks
![Page 9: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
...corresponds to our former results on momentum distributions in the rest frame, seePZ, Eur.Phys.J. C52, 121 (2007)
f1q(x) → Pq(pT)
Input for f1 (x)
MRST LO at 4 GeV2
![Page 10: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What do we know about intrinsic motion?
?
Leptonic data:Models: statistical,
covariant<pT>≈0.1 GeV/c
Hadronic data:SIDIS, Cahn effect
<pT> ≈ 0.6 GeV/c
Further study is needed!
![Page 11: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
pT/Mg1q(x)0.100.130.20
X0.150.180.220.30
Input for g1 :LSS LO at 4 GeV2
![Page 12: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Comment
In general g1q (x,pT) changes signat pT=Mx. It is due to the factor:
The situation is similar to the g2 (x) case:
With our choice of the light-cone direction: large x are correlated with large negative p1
low x are correlated with large positive p1
both expressions have opposite signs for large and low x E155 experiment
![Page 13: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Kinematic constraintsBjorken variable satisfies:
For details see P.Z. arXiv:1106.5607[hep-ph]
For sufficiently large Q2,
one can replace (in any reference frame):
AND
![Page 17: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ANDrot. sym.
Combinations (+,-) of both imply:
rot. sym.
Rest frame:
![Page 18: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Shortly:
Conditions for equality x, xB
are satisfied
OR:
x, xB cannot beidentified!
We still assume rotational symmetry in the rest frame
![Page 19: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
x ≠ xB would imply experimentally measured structure functions (xB) cannot be compared with the light cone calculations (x)
x = xB and pT>M/2 - are contradictory statements Obtained constraints are model-independent Our covariant model assumes x = xB and we observe
that pT , p obtained from corresponding analysis of structure functions are always less then M/2. It is only consequence and illustration of general conditions above.
Remarks:
![Page 20: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary 1. We discussed some aspects of quark motion inside
nucleon within 3D covariant parton model: We derived the relations between TMDs and PDFs. With the use of these relations we calculated the set of
unpolarized and polarized TMDs. We again demonstrated Lorentz invariance + rotational
symmetry represent powerful tool for obtaining new (approximate) relations among distribution functions, including PDFs ↔ TMDs.
2. We discussed kinematic constraints due to rotational symmetry (model independent)
![Page 21: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Thank you !
![Page 22: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Backup slides
![Page 23: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
3D covariant parton model
e-e-
General framework
![Page 24: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Structure functions
Input:3D distributionfunctions in the
proton rest frame(starting representation)
Result:
structure functions
(x=Bjorken xB !)
![Page 25: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
F1, F2 - manifestly covariant form:
![Page 26: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
g1, g2 - manifestly covariant form:
![Page 27: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Comments In the limit of usual approach assuming p = xP,
(i.e. intrinsic motion is completely supressed) one gets known relations between the structure and distribution functions:
We work with a ‘naive’ 3D parton model, which is based on covariant kinematics (and not infinite momentum frame). Main potential: implication of some old and new sum rules and relations among PDF’s and TMDs.
![Page 28: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ROLE OF QUARKSIN PROTON SPIN
![Page 29: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Intrinsic motion1) electrons in atom:
2) nucleons in nucleus:
3) quarks in nucleon:
![Page 30: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Angular momentum Total angular momentum consists of j=l+s. In relativistic case l,s are not conserved separately, only j is conserved.
So, we can have pure states of j (j2,jz) only, which are represented by the bispinor spherical waves:
[P.Z. Eur.Phys.J. C52, 121 (2007)]
![Page 31: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
j=1/2
![Page 32: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Spin & orbital motion
In relativistic limit:
only 1/3 of j contributes to S
… in general:
![Page 33: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Interplay of spin and orbital motion
![Page 34: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Spin and orbital motion from PDF’s
H. Avakian, A. V. Efremov, P. Schweitzer and F. YuanPhys.Rev.D81:074035(2010). J. She, J. Zhu and B. Q. Ma Phys.Rev.D79 054008(2009).
Our model:
![Page 35: Relation between TMDs and PDFs in the covariant parton model approach](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081520/568160f2550346895dd02848/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
1. wavefunctions (bispinor spherical waves) & operators
2. probabilistic distributions & structure functions (in our model)
Two pictures:
Also in our model OAM can be identified with pretzelosity!