religious liberty lesson 5

Upload: bill-of-rights-institute

Post on 05-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    1/24

    1

    The Supreme Court, the First Amendment, and Belief

    The curriculum, Religious

    Liberty: The AmericanExperiment, including a

    series of teacherprofessional development

    programs around thecountry, was made

    possible by generousdonations from the George

    Washington Institute forReligious Freedom.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    2/24

    2

    Religious Liberty: The American Experiment

    Lesson 5

    Religious Liberty and theSupreme Court

    Objectives:

    Understand the facts of landmarkSupreme Court cases on the FirstAmendments protection against

    established religion.

    Assess the Supreme Courtsinterpretations of the FirstAmendment with respect toreligion in public schools.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    3/24

    Mission Statement

    Established in 1999, the Institute is a 501(c)(3) notfor profit charity focused on providing educationalresources on America's Founding documents and

    principles for teachers and students of AmericanHistory and Civics. Our mission is to educateyoung people about the words and ideas of theFounders, the liberties guaranteed in our Founding

    documents, and how our Founding principlescontinue to affect and shape a free society.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    4/24

    Components of Professional Development

    Enhance our own knowledge

    Explore new teachingstrategies

    Enrich the expertise ofother teachers

    There is no knowledge that is not power.~Ralph Waldo Emerson

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    5/24

    Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts &Literacy in History/Social Studies

    8. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning inseminal U.S. texts, including the applicationof constitutional principles and use of legal

    reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Courtmajority opinions and dissents) and thepremises, purposes, and arguments inworks of public advocacy (e.g., TheFederalist, presidential addresses).

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    6/24

    6

    Important Definitions

    Tolerance: refers to individualsrelationships and attitudes toward oneanother; capacity for or the practice ofrecognizing and respecting the beliefs or

    practices of others.Toleration: government policy that permitsthe practice of certain religions; thepractice of religion is a privilege allowed

    by government.Religious liberty: the idea that freedom ofconscience is an inalienable right not under

    the legitimate control of government.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    7/24

    Lesson Five

    Document Based Question

    Jason is the valedictorian of a public high

    school. Is he allowed to mention his faithin his valedictory address?

    If he does so, has the school district

    violated the First Amendment? 7

    Background Essay tracesdevelopments through thecases shown in the followingslides.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    8/24

    Religious Liberty Landmark Cases

    Establishment Clause Issues in thePublic Schools

    Cases are presented here as a warm-upsee Lesson 5 in Religious

    Liberty: The American Experimentfor

    a Document-Based Question usingthis historical background.

    8

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    9/24

    A public school teacher may lead theclass in prayer at the beginning of class

    time.

    False: Engel v. Vitale(1962) New York Board of Regents suggestedprayer for the beginning of the school day violated the EstablishmentClause. Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee,and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and ourcountry. Amen. Students who objected could be excused during theprayer. The state school board did not require the use of this prayer,

    but did compose and endorse it.

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    10/24

    Teachers may teach about religionin public school.

    True: School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, 1963It might well be said that ones education is not completewithout a study of comparative religion, or the history ofreligion and its relationship to the advancement ofcivilization. Study of the Bible or of religion, (must

    be)presented objectively as part of a secular program of

    education

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    11/24

    Tax money may be used to help pay teacher

    salaries in church-related schools.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    False: In Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971, the Courtdeveloped the three-part Lemon Test for lawsdealing with religious establishment. Such a lawmust : 1. have a secular purpose, 2. haveprinciple effects that neither advance nor inhibitreligion, and 3.not foster an excessive

    government entanglement with religion.

    1. True

    2. False

    Alton Lemon

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    12/24

    A public school teacher may post the Ten

    Commandments in his or her classroom.

    False: Stone v. Graham 1980. Unless such a poster ispart of a historical display with a secular purpose,for example, in comparative religion or literaturestudies, the display would violate the Establishment

    Clause.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    13/24

    A state legislature may require publicschools to institute a moment of silence for

    meditation or voluntary prayer.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

    Depends on the true purpose of the law. In Wallace v. Jaffree1985, it was clear that the Alabama legislature intended to

    encourage school-sponsored prayer, so the Alabama statutewas unconstitutional.

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    14/24

    Public school students have the right to

    pray individually or in groups while atschool.

    True: Board of Education of Westside Schools v. Mergens 1990

    Students may discuss religious topics with their peers as longas they are not disruptive. The Establishment Clauseprohibits school endorsement of religious views, but it doesnot apply to purely private speech; the same rules of orderapply to voluntary religious speech as apply to anyother type of voluntary student speech.

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    15/24

    Public school students may express their

    religious beliefs in the form of reports,homework, and artwork.

    True: (Mergens, 1990) Teachers must not reject or correct such submissionssimply because they include a religious symbol or address religious

    themes. These assignments should be judged by ordinary academicstandards of substance, relevance, appearance and grammar. There is acrucial difference between government speech endorsing religion, whichthe Establishment Clause forbids, and private speech endorsing religion,which the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses protect.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    16/24

    Public school students may meet in a Bible

    Study Club on school grounds after schoolhours.

    True: (Board of Education v. Mergens, 1990) According to the

    Equal Access Act, students must be allowed to participatein religious clubs on the same terms as any other non-curricular club. School officials may not actively participatein club activities and non-school persons may not control

    or regularly attend club meetings.

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    17/24

    A Rabbi may lead the audience in a non-

    denominational prayer at public schoolgraduation.

    False: Lee v. Weisman1992: The Establishment Clause wasinspired by the lesson that in the hands of government whatmight begin as a tolerant expression of religious views mayend in a policy to indoctrinate and coerce. Prayer exercises inelementary and secondary schools carry a particular risk ofindirect coercion. (Providence, RI)

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    18/24

    Public school officials may plan

    religious baccalaureate ceremonies.

    False: Lee v. Weisman. School officials, when acting in theirofficial capacities, are representatives of the state and mayneither encourage nor impede student religious activity. TheEstablishment Clause means that the school must maintain aposition of official neutrality. If the school rents out itsfacilities to private groups, it must rent them on the same

    terms to organizers of religious activities.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    19/24

    Public school teachers and administrators may

    actively participate in the annual See You at thePole observance.

    False: Peloza v. Capistrano Unified Sch. Dist. ; Lee vs. Weisman;

    others.Such events are permissible for students, subject to ordinarytime, place, and manner policies set by the schools. However,school officials, acting in an official capacity, may neitherdiscourage nor encourage participation in such an event. Anyschool officials attendance at such events in a custodial

    oversight role must be voluntary and non-participatory.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    20/24

    Students may lead the student body in

    prayer on the P.A. system before publicschool football games.

    False: In Santa Fe Independent School District v.Doe, 2000, the Supreme Court ruled that sucha practice indicates school support for

    religious views, and is impermissible.

    1. True

    2. False

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    L d k S C C R li i F d

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    21/24

    State funding may be used to purchasecomputer equipment for religious schools.

    True: Mitchell v. Helms 2000 Supreme Court held that thegovernment could pay for computer equipment for public,private, and religious schools because the secular goal wasimproved education for students.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

    L d k S C t C R li i F d

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    22/24

    A public school coach may encourage andparticipate in a student-led pre-game prayerwith his/her team.

    False: Borden v. School District of the Township of EastBrunswick . However, teachers may engage in privatereligious activity in faculty areas. Supreme Court

    denied Bordens request on March 2, 2009.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    23/24

    A public school student may post the

    Ten Commandments in his or herlocker.

    True: Various. If students are permitted topersonalize or decorate the inside of their lockers,schools must not discriminate against religious

    messages.

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases-Religious Freedom

    1. True

    2. False

  • 7/31/2019 Religious Liberty Lesson 5

    24/24

    Educating Young People about the Constitution

    www BillofRightsInstitute org

    We WantYOU

    To use ourcurriculum

    To let us know how

    these resources work

    in your classroom

    To pilot or evaluate

    our curriculum