renaldo lorio adrian jongens gerrie van zyl emile du preez sat seminar feedback road noise study
TRANSCRIPT
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Renaldo LorioAdrian JongensGerrie van ZylEmile Du Preez
SAT Seminar Feedback
Road Noise Study
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDBackground
• National road network a generally high speed road network
• Many sections of the national road network traverse in close proximity to residential areas (noise sensitive areas)Development crept closer to the national roads
2
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
3
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
4
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
5
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Background
• More complaints are being received of late (Mossel Bay, Colchester amongst others)
• In the past road noise was dealt with intuitively (use of OGA and UTFC in close proximity to noise sensitive areas)
• Did not properly understand the properties of the materials w.r.t. noise
• Somewhat averse due to high L.C.C.• Initiated road noise study in 2012
6
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Scope
• Study Need Understand road noise RequirementsEffect of different surfacing typesMeasures to reduce noise levels on N2/6Recommend strategy
• Dissemination of informationSAT SeminarsSummary report after review
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Sources of traffic related noise
8
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Summary
• Understanding road noisePropulsion noise ( Engine, gearbox etc.)Rolling Noise
• Radial vibrations
• Air pumping
• Slip-stick (High frequency effect of tyre on smooth floor)
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Summary
• Rolling noise amplificationHorn effect
• Texture
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
12
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Noise mitigation
• Minimise at source (most effective)• Speed reduction (e.g.120km/h to 100km/h)
Not significant effect• Half the speed - 2dBA noise reduction
• Separation distanceDoubling the distance - reduce 3dBA
• Noise barriersExpensivePartially effective
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Road noise measurements
• Measurement methods Close Proximity Method
• Cannot be used to calculate LAeq
Statistical Pass-by Method• 7.5 – 10m from lane• 1.4m high
• Results LAmax
Calculation • LAeq
Microphone
Microphone pre-amplifiers
Sum sound intensities at each frequency
A-weighted sound spectrum levels
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Existing surfacings investigated
• Existing (old) surfacing types measured9,5 mm UTFC13,2 mm UTFC6,7 mm UTFC9,5 mm SMAContinuous graded asphaltCGA with rolled-in chips (13,2 mm)9,5 mm Single seal13,2 mm Single seal13,2 + 6,7 mm Double seal
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Results
Note: Values represent only single surveys – Not a representative sample
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Ideal
• Reduce road noise at source Reduce texture depth
• (Within safety limits)
Short & equal wave length (Aggregate size <8mm) Negative texture as far as possible
• Aggregate shape• Construction e.g. Rolling practices
Increase porosity/ interconnected voids and thickness Binder type (Bitumen rubber)
Positive textureNegative texture
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Ideal
Microflex 0/6
Porosity 15% Thickness 2.5 cm
2.5cm
4.5cm
Twinlay 4/8 – 11/16
• Affordability ?
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Seal trials to reduce noise N2-6
• Resealed with 19/9 double seal • Increase in road noise after reseal of N2/6• Complaints• Purpose of this experiment
Improve road noise through seal treatments Measure impact on road noise Measure texture depth and skid resistance
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Treatments
Existing 19/9 – No loss (Reference) 19/9 + Grit 19/9 + 6.7mm
19/9 + Fine Slurry 19/9 Close packing 19/9/9 Split seal
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
N2/6 Results – Noise Improvement Trials
4.7 dBA
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Conclusions
• Only one surfacing with LAeq less than 65 dBA
• Seals generally Higher LAeq than paved asphalt
• 9.5 UTFC not performing as expected• Speed does not make a big difference• More measurements required
To determine longer term effects and ranges• N2/6 trials
All trials showed improvementSlurry option LAeq = 4.7 dBA (significant reduction)
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
Strategy Forward
• Noise mitigationCombined responsibility
• Land use planning • Cost of noise barriers
Surfacing type selectionImprove rolling noise at source
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
25
MYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTDMYCUBE ASSET MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS (PTY) LTD
END