replication and modification of an experiment picnic ... · pdf filereplication and...
TRANSCRIPT
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
1
Psychology Internal Assessment
Replication and modification of an
Experiment “Picnic Basket” by Brewer and
Treyens in 1981
Non-IB Psychology
Candidate Name: Mugi Kito
School: Wells International School
Date of submission: 2015. 5. 9.
Word count: 1376
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
2
INDEX
ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4
METHOD ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
Design ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
Participants ............................................................................................................................................... 4
Materials ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Procedure .................................................................................................................................................. 5
RESULTS – DESCRIPTIVE ................................................................................................................................ 6
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................... 7
REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................................... 8
APENDIX ........................................................................................................................................................ 9
Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 9
Appendix 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 10
Appendix 3 .............................................................................................................................................. 11
Appendix 4 .............................................................................................................................................. 13
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
3
ABSTRACT
The experiment “Picnic Basket”, done by Brewer and Treyens in 1981, was conducted to
investigate to what extent the schema on human memory was reliable. Researchers hypothesized that a
stereotypical schema of an office room would affect memory of an office room. Schema is a mental
representation stored in human memory, which informs the expectation from experiences and cultures.
First, the researchers put some objects which did not conform to the office schema, such as a
picnic basket and wine bottle. The laboratory, an office room, also contained objects which conform to
the office schema, such as desks, typewriter and calendar. Then, 30 university students were gathered
as participants. They were, individually, left in the office and waited for 35 seconds. After that, they
were taken into another room. Then, researchers asked participants to write down the objects in the
office as many as they could remember.
As a result, the participants recalled the things in “typical office room” according to their
schema on their memories, such as desks and typewriter. Also, some students recalled things that would
be expected in a typical office but were not present in the one. In addition, some did not recall things
that were not supposed to be in their “typical office”, such as a wine bottle and picnic basket, because
their schema did not have those things. Researchers concluded that the memory was affected by their
social schema. Memory was, to some extent, unreliable.
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
4
INTRODUCTION
According to results and conclusion of the experiment done by Brewer and Treyens in 1981,
human memory was, to some extent, unreliable; it was influenced by the schema developed through
experiences and cultures. This fact was proven with the evidence. However, there was a limitation; the
experiment lacked ecological validity. Thus, this replication modified some procedures and aimed to re-
investigate the reliability of schema, as well as to lessen the possibilities of getting inaccurate results.
Because the actual experimental study lacked ecological validity, this replication used a room that
participants always used in order to make them feel as comfortable as possible. Therefore, researchers
hypothesized the result would be more accurate.
METHOD
Design
The type of this experiment was laboratory/controlled experiment in which the participants
were put under a controlled situation and researchers aim to measure certain data. There were six
possible ethical considerations (participants’ protection, consent, right to withdraw, confidentiality,
debriefing and deception) and all of them were strictly followed. The researchers asked participants to
sign the consent form and gave each participant a debriefing note after the process. Collected signs
were kept in a locked locker.
Participants
The participants were gathered by “opportunity sampling” because this was the most
convenient and not time consuming. The target populations were students and teachers in Wells
International School, including both Asians and Westerners. Each participant was experimented
individually. They were required to have enough English understanding ability because the instruction,
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
5
results, and debriefing note were shown in English. They were also required to be able to sign the
consent form and totally agree to be part of the experiment.
Materials
Consent form
Paper
Pencil
Room
Wine glass
Grape juice or apple juice
Picnic basket
Timer
Procedure
1. Prepare a picnic basket and wine glass filled with grape/apple juice in the office (Reference to
appendix 4)
2. Get the agreement sign by each participant through handing them a consent form
3. Leave one participant in the office
4. Count 35 seconds by using a timer
5. Let him/her come out of the office room
6. Give him/her a piece of paper and pencil
7. Ask him/her to recall things as many as they can for around 2 minutes
8. Debrief, or explain aim of the experiment to the participants
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
6
RESULTS – DESCRIPTIVE
The number of participants who recalled apples on the table was 7 out of 15, which was
approximately 47%. The number of participants who recalled wine glass and picnic basket was 6 each
out of 15, which was 40%. On the other hand, the number of participants who recalled desks, chair and
window was much higher, which was approximately 84%. However, as it was shown below on the table
and graph, there were other objects were recalled fewer than the non-typical objects, such as
bookshelves and computers. In addition to that, the participants who recalled apples tended to recall
picnic basket and wineglass as well.
Objects Numbers recalled / 15 Percentage
Desk 14 93.3%
Books 14 93.3%
Chairs 10 71.4%
Whiteboard 9 60%
Paper 9 60%
Apples 7 46.7%
Window 7 46.7%
Wineglass filled with juice 6 40%
Picnic basket 6 40%
Door 5 33.3%
Book shelves 5 33.3%
Computer 4 26.7%
Pencils 4 26.7%
Bags 4 26.7%
Pens 4 26.7%
Markers 4 26.7%
Notebooks 4 26.7%
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
7
As the table and graph show, the typical objects such as desks, books and chairs are ranked in the first
three. Then, untypical objects are ranked. After those objects, other typical objects are ranked. Thus, the
untypical objects are recalled less than some typical objects, but also more than some others.
DISCUSSION
The objects which were not supposed to be in the office were recalled by less than 50% of the
participants while the objects which were typically in the office were recalled by more than 80% of the
participants. Therefore, it can be concluded that the replication experiment gets almost the same result
and conclusion as the actual “Picnic Basket” study. The hypothesis of schema theory was proven.
However, as a limitation, the number of participants was less than the actual one. Thus, it may be not as
accurate as the actual one. Also, the experiment lacked ecological validity as it was carried out under a
controlled situation although the room was familiar to all of the participants. In addition to that, as
shown above, there were some typical objects which were not recalled by many participants. It means
that human memory was, to some extent, not trustable if only put for 30 seconds in a room. Finally, the
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
8
participants who recalled apples tended to recall wine glass and picnic basket as well. It means they
somehow realized the room was set artificially in order to carry out an experiment. Thus, it lacked
ecological validity.
However, the experimental research also had strengths as well as limitations. First, because it
had got similar results to the replicated study “Picnic Basket”, replication research could support the
schema theory stronger. Human memory was, to some extent, unreliable. Second, the experiment could
conduct a cause-and-effect relationship of how human memories were unreliable. The schema which
has been developed through participant’s experience and culture was the cause, affecting their
memories’ reliability.
In conclusion, the replication of “Picnic Basket” had both limitations and strengths. But it could
have similar results after all, proving the schema theory was true and the research study “Picnic Basket
(1981)” done by Brewer and Treyens was almost accurate and reliable.
REFERENCE
"Picnic Basket IA Experiment." Picnic Basket IA Experiment. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 May 2015.
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1y9kjea7fmRXCXpiaw0TZxD80a1Fnq0MSiXrp9zagfl4/pubhtm
l>.
"Experimental Methods in Psychology | Simply Psychology." Experimental Methods in Psychology |
Simply Psychology. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 May 2015. <http://www.simplypsychology.org/experimental-
method.html>.
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
9
"Psychology Internal Assessment." IB, n.d. Web. <https%3A%2F%2Fibpublishing.ibo.org%2Flive-
exist%2Frest%2Fapp%2Fpub.xql%3Fdoc%3DEX_instructions_2013_e%26part%3D8%26chapter%3D7%2
6page%3D1>.
Psychology Internal Assessment. Geneva: International Baccalaureate Organisation, 1996. Web. 25 Apr.
2015.
APENDIX
Appendix 1
Consent form:
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
10
Appendix 2
Debriefing Note:
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
11
Appendix 3
Result table
Objects Numbers recalled / 15 Percentage
Desk 14 93.3%
Books 14 93.3%
Chairs 10 71.4%
Whiteboard 9 60%
Paper 9 60%
Apples 7 46.7%
Window 7 46.7%
Wineglass filled with juice 6 40%
Picnic basket 6 40%
Door 5 33.3%
Book shelves 5 33.3%
Computer 4 26.7%
Pencils 4 26.7%
Bags 4 26.7%
Pens 4 26.7%
Markers 4 26.7%
Notebooks 4 26.7%
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
12
Desk: 14/15*100=93.33333
Books: 14/15*100=93.33333
Chairs: 10/15*100=66.66666
Whiteboard: 9/15*100=60
Paper: 9/15*100=60
Apples: 7/15*100=46.66666
Window: 7/15*100=46.66666
Wine glass: 6/15*100=40
Basket: 6/15*100=40
Door: 5/15*100=33.33333
Bookshelves: 5/15*100=33.33333
Computer: 4/15*100=26.66666
Pencils: 4/15*100=26.66666
Bags: 4/15*100=26.66666
Pens: 4/15*100=26.66666
Markers: 4/15*100=26.66666
Notebooks: 4/15*100=26.66666
Wells International School Non-IB Psychology Internal Assessment
13
Appendix 4
The room which was used for this experiment (with wineglass filled with juice, picnic basket, and apples)