reply to letter to the editor

1
children may prove to be a difficult conversation with parents. This conversation must balance the perceived benefits of laparoscopic repair with the potential, but as yet unproven, risk of neurotoxicity from general anesthesia. Robert Williams Ian Black Kennith Sartorelli College of Medicine University of Vermont Burlington, VT, USA E-mail address: [email protected] doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.055 References [1] Walker K, Halliday R, Holland A, et al. Early developmental outcome of infants with infantile hypertrophic stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45: 2369-72. [2] Williams R, Adams D, Eladjem E, et al. The safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia for surgery in infants: the Vermont Infant Spinal Registry. Anesth Analg 2006;102:67-71. [3] Lachko L, Simhi E, Freud E, et al. Impact of spinal anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy on operating room time. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44: 1942-6. [4] Somri M, Gaitini L, Vaida S, et al. The effectiveness and safety of spinal anesthesia in the pyloromyotomy procedure. Pediatr Anesth 2003;13: 32-7. Reply to Letter to the Editor To the Editor, Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the insightful comments from Dr Williams et al. They raise several important points that are worthy of further discussion. First, although our study revealed evidence of neurodevelopmental delay in infants after pyloromyotomy under general anesthesia (GA), this does not necessarily imply causation [1]. Although it remains possible that the delays we observed were solely the result of GA in these infants, it would seem perhaps more likely that they reflect a combination of factors that might include a link between those genes predisposing to infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), any residual electrolyte imbalances, mild starvation, and GA [1]. Certainly, as part of our continuing study, we propose to reevaluate these children at 3 years to assess for any long- term developmental delay. Rather than to engender panic, however, we agree that these data should stimulate colleagues to reflect upon their own practice and consider the need for a well-supported and properly funded randomized, controlled trial. In our own institution, the largest of 3 pediatric teaching hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, pyloromyotomy has generally been performed under GA. Although, in the past, this mode of anesthesia may have simply reflected a traditional attitude, during the last 3 years, many of our colleagues, after a careful review of the surgical literature, have moved to a laparoscopic approach to the operative treatment of IHPS [2]. A double-blind, randomized multicenter trial published in 2009 identified several advantages with this technique, including a shorter recovery, early time to full feeds, and reduced analgesic requirements [3]. We suspect that many pediatric surgeons would now be reluctant to revert to an open technique that the switch to spinal anesthesia would require without compelling evidence. Finally, although Dr Williams et al correctly identify many of the advantages associated with spinal anesthesia, such a technique requires considerable skill and is not itself without risk, including an inadequate block, respiratory insufficiency, and rarely, sepsis [4,5]. Karen Walker Robert Halliday Nadia Badawi Grace Centre for Newborn Care The Children's Hospital at Westmead The University of Sydney New South Wales, Australia E-mail address: [email protected] Andrew J.A. Holland Department of Surgery The Children's Hospital at Westmead The University of Sydney New South Wales, Australia doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.058 References [1] Walker K, Halliday R, Holland AJA, et al. Early developmental outcome of infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:2639-72. [2] Aspelund G, Langer JC. Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Sem Pediatr Surg 2007;16:27-33. [3] Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:390-8. [4] Luz G, Buchele H, Innerhofer P, et al. Spinal anaesthesia and meningitis in former preterm infants: cause-effect? Paediatr Anaesthesia 1999;9: 262-4. [5] Tobias JD. Spinal anaesthesia in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesthesia 2000;10:5-16. 1299 Correspondence

Upload: karen-walker

Post on 25-Oct-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

children may prove to be a difficult conversation withparents. This conversation must balance the perceivedbenefits of laparoscopic repair with the potential, but as yetunproven, risk of neurotoxicity from general anesthesia.

Robert WilliamsIan Black

Kennith SartorelliCollege of Medicine

University of VermontBurlington, VT, USA

E-mail address: [email protected]

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.055

References

[1] Walker K, Halliday R, Holland A, et al. Early developmental outcomeof infants with infantile hypertrophic stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:2369-72.

[2] Williams R, Adams D, Eladjem E, et al. The safety and efficacy ofspinal anesthesia for surgery in infants: the Vermont Infant SpinalRegistry. Anesth Analg 2006;102:67-71.

[3] Lachko L, Simhi E, Freud E, et al. Impact of spinal anesthesia for openpyloromyotomy on operating room time. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:1942-6.

[4] Somri M, Gaitini L, Vaida S, et al. The effectiveness and safety of spinalanesthesia in the pyloromyotomy procedure. Pediatr Anesth 2003;13:32-7.

Reply to Letter to the Editor

To the Editor,Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the insightful

comments from Dr Williams et al. They raise severalimportant points that are worthy of further discussion. First,although our study revealed evidence of neurodevelopmentaldelay in infants after pyloromyotomy under generalanesthesia (GA), this does not necessarily imply causation[1]. Although it remains possible that the delays we observedwere solely the result of GA in these infants, it would seemperhaps more likely that they reflect a combination of factorsthat might include a link between those genes predisposing toinfantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), any residualelectrolyte imbalances, mild starvation, and GA [1].Certainly, as part of our continuing study, we propose toreevaluate these children at 3 years to assess for any long-term developmental delay. Rather than to engender panic,however, we agree that these data should stimulatecolleagues to reflect upon their own practice and considerthe need for a well-supported and properly fundedrandomized, controlled trial.

In our own institution, the largest of 3 pediatric teachinghospitals in New South Wales, Australia, pyloromyotomyhas generally been performed under GA. Although, in thepast, this mode of anesthesia may have simply reflected atraditional attitude, during the last 3 years, many of ourcolleagues, after a careful review of the surgical literature,have moved to a laparoscopic approach to the operativetreatment of IHPS [2]. A double-blind, randomizedmulticenter trial published in 2009 identified severaladvantages with this technique, including a shorterrecovery, early time to full feeds, and reduced analgesicrequirements [3]. We suspect that many pediatric surgeonswould now be reluctant to revert to an open technique thatthe switch to spinal anesthesia would require withoutcompelling evidence.

Finally, although Dr Williams et al correctly identifymany of the advantages associated with spinal anesthesia,such a technique requires considerable skill and is not itselfwithout risk, including an inadequate block, respiratoryinsufficiency, and rarely, sepsis [4,5].

Karen WalkerRobert HallidayNadia Badawi

Grace Centre for Newborn CareThe Children's Hospital at Westmead

The University of SydneyNew South Wales, Australia

E-mail address: [email protected]

Andrew J.A. HollandDepartment of Surgery

The Children's Hospital at WestmeadThe University of Sydney

New South Wales, Australia

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.058

References

[1] Walker K, Halliday R, Holland AJA, et al. Early developmentaloutcome of infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J PediatrSurg 2010;45:2639-72.

[2] Aspelund G, Langer JC. Current management of hypertrophic pyloricstenosis. Sem Pediatr Surg 2007;16:27-33.

[3] Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, et al. Recovery after open versuslaparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blindmulticentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:390-8.

[4] Luz G, Buchele H, Innerhofer P, et al. Spinal anaesthesia and meningitisin former preterm infants: cause-effect? Paediatr Anaesthesia 1999;9:262-4.

[5] Tobias JD. Spinal anaesthesia in infants and children. PaediatrAnaesthesia 2000;10:5-16.

1299Correspondence