report 10 narrow lane

Upload: bpjervis

Post on 09-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Report 10 Narrow Lane

    1/5

    Post-Roman Pottery from Narrow Lane,

    Romsey, Hampshire

    Ben Jervis Archaeological Report 10

    By Ben Jervis MA PIFA

    INTRODUCTION

    This report discusses the post-Roman pottery from excavations at Narrow Lane, Romsey in 1981 by

    Test Valley Archaeological Trust. These excavations revealed a series of post-medieval and medieval

    garden soils, overlying a thick, dark layer containing metal working debris. It has been tentatively

    determined that the iron working activity dates to the Anglo-Saxon period. This layer overlay a series

    of features of Roman and Iron Age date.

    This report uses the data collected by Dr. Andrew Russel who first spot-dated the pottery from the

    site, but sherds have been re-assigned to a new fabric series defined by the author. The reason for

    this is that several different fabric recording systems have been used for material from Romsey. Dr.

    Russels system splits the fabrics into many types, meaning that it is a simple task to amalgamate

    them into new types. This was carried out by Helen Rees, however her types, particularly for the

    later medieval pottery have been determined as not being defined enough, meaning that a middle

    ground has been sought. The types mentioned here are defined in Jervis, B. Forthcoming Medieval

    Pottery from Romsey: An Overview and fabric descriptions have been lodged with Hampshire

    Museum Service.

    This report only deals with the Anglo-Saxon, medieval and post-medieval pottery from the site,

    those interested in the Roman and prehistoric pottery should refer to the report in the site archive

    (Rees 1990). Whilst the analysis is quantitative, it should be noted that several post-medieval

    features are simply recorded as having lots of post-medieval pottery. Therefore, for the later

    features a full quantitative analysis has not been possible. It may be worth re-assessing the pottery

    from these layers in the future. The report will first present a brief overview of the pottery types

    present, before discussing the post-Roman pottery present as residual material in Roman deposits,

    material from the iron working layers, material from Anglo-Saxon features not associated with the

    iron working activity and, finally, material from later deposits.

    OVERVIEW OF THEASSEMBLAGE

    Given that the bulk of the features are of Roman date, it is unsurprising that the vast majority of the

    pottery is Roman in date (table 1). These account for 1362 of the 1749 sherds from the quantified

    assemblage. The next most common ware is Wessex Coarseware, a common 12th

    -14th

    century type

    in Romsey, whilst flint and sand tempered wares are also common. Seven sherds each of mid-Saxon

    Organic tempered ware and the coarser flint tempered ware, similar to that from the latter phases

    of Hamwic, are present. There are also a small quantity of chalk tempered wares, identified as a

    major component of some Anglo-Saxon assemblages from Romsey (Lorraine Mepham, pers. comm).

    There are 22 sherds of fine quartz tempered ware, a type identified in Winchester, of whichMichelmersh-type ware is one variant. There are a small quantity of later medieval glazed sandy

  • 8/8/2019 Report 10 Narrow Lane

    2/5

    wares including Laverstock-type ware, South Hampshire Redware and Southampton-type Sandy

    Ware, all can be dated to the 13th

    -14th

    centuries. Sherds of 14th

    -15th

    century sandy wares MQ3 and

    Ware Name SC SW

    Prehistoric 2 28

    Roman 1362 20175Mid Saxon Organic Tempered 7 72

    Flint tempered ware 7 66

    Flint and sand tempered ware 38 431Flint and sand tempered ware (Newburytype) 16 129

    MQargf1 12 83

    Flint tempered with coarse sand and chalk 14 114

    Chalk tempered ware 5 49

    FQc1 1 5

    Wessex Coarseware 122 1058

    Fine sandy ware 22 210

    FQ2 1 14FQfeq1 2 11

    Laverstock-type Ware 17 123

    South Hampshire Redware 5 66

    Southampton Sandy Ware 6 48

    MQfe2 3 15

    MQfe3 1 21

    MQ3 1 4

    MQ4 11 74

    Misc. Medieval 15 115

    Border Ware 5 29

    Post Medieval Redware 9 133

    Tudor Green 2 27

    Verwood 24 178

    Tin Glazed Ware 1 5

    Misc. Post Med "Lots" "Lots"

    Modern "Lots" "Lots"

    Unid. 4 27

    Total 1743 23448

    Table 1: Pottery Types Present at Narrow Lane (from site archive data).

    MQ4 are present in very small quantities. A range of post-medieval types are present, including

    sherds of Verwood-type, Post Medieval Redware, Border Ware and Tudor Green, as well as sherds of

    Tin Glazed Ware.

    MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM PREHISTORIC AND ROMAN FEATURES

    Features of prehistoric and Roman date (phases 1-3) contained 672 sherds, 641 of which were

    prehistoric and Roman in date (Table 2). Sherds of both periods are large (ASW 18g). Sherds of

    medieval date are considerably smaller. The earliest wares present are 3 small sherds of mid-Saxon

    organic tempered ware and 5 sherds of coarse Flint Tempered Ware. Six sherds of Flint and Sand

    Tempered ware of Newbury type are present along with 4 sherds of Flint and Sand Tempered ware,

    a type dated to the Saxo-Norman period in Romsey. Twelfth-thirteenth century types are

    represented by sherds of Wessex Coarseware and Laverstock-type ware whilst a single sherd of Fine

    Sandy Ware is also present. There is clearly an intrusive element in these early features

    demonstrating that later gardening activity on the site disturbed these features.

  • 8/8/2019 Report 10 Narrow Lane

    3/5

    Ware Name SC SW ASW

    Prehistoric 1 18 18

    Roman 640 11687 18

    Mid Saxon Organic Tempered3 18 6

    Flint tempered ware 5 31 6

    Flint and sand tempered ware 4 39 10Flint and sand tempered ware (Newburytype) 6 30 5

    Flint tempered with coarse sand and chalk 1 10 10

    Wessex Coarseware 6 41 7

    Fine sandy ware 1 4 4

    Laverstock-type Ware 1 3 3

    Misc. Medieval 1 3 3

    Unid. 3 24 8

    Total 672 11908

    Table 2: Pottery from Roman Features.

    MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM THE IRON WORKING LAYER

    A total of 630 sherds were recovered from the dark layer of charcoal and metal working debris

    which covered the site. A total of 391 of these were of Roman date, possibly illustrating that this

    layer developed over several centuries, or possibly indicating a strong residual presence (table 3).

    Sherds are noticeably smaller than in the earlier deposits (ASW: 10g). The largest sherds of Anglo-

    Saxon date, including 2 sherds of Organic Tempered Ware and 2 sherds of coarse Flint Tempered

    Ware. There are 4 sherds of Chalk Tempered Ware and 5 sherds of Newbury type flint and sand

    tempered ware present, as well as 25 moderately sized sherds of Saxo-Norman flint and sand

    tempered ware. The fact that these Anglo-Saxon and Saxo-Norman types are present in a lessfragmented state than the later and earlier wares perhaps supports the attribution of an Anglo-

    Saxon date for the deposits. There is a great deal of intrusive material, although sherds are generally

    very small and a wide range of types are present, all in small quantities. These include 12th

    -14th

    century types such as Wessex Coarseware, Laverstock-type Ware and South Hampshire Redware, as

    well as sherds of various post-medieval earthenwares. Gardening activity in the medieval and post-

    medieval periods clearly disturbed this layer, leading to this mixing of material.

    MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM OTHER PHASE 4 FEATURES

    Phase 4 is deemed to be of potential Anglo-Saxon date. All but 5 of the 298 sherds from features of

    this phase are Roman in date however and sherds are considerably larger than those of later types

    (table 4). With the exception of the single small sherd of Organic Tempered Ware sherds are all of

    12th

    -14th

    century date and therefore are intrusive, given that these features are contemporary with

    or pre-date the iron working layer. The pottery suggests a Roman date.

  • 8/8/2019 Report 10 Narrow Lane

    4/5

    Ware Name SC SW ASW

    Prehistoric 1 9 8

    Roman 391 4043 10

    Mid Saxon Organic Tempered 2 36 18

    Flint tempered ware 2 35 18

    Flint and sand tempered ware25 305 12

    Flint and sand tempered ware (Newbury type) 5 88 18

    MQargf1 12 83 7

    Flint tempered with coarse sand and chalk 8 54 7

    Chalk tempered ware 4 46 12

    FQc1 1 5 5

    Wessex Coarseware 86 744 9

    Fine sandy ware 12 105 9

    FQfeq1 2 11 6

    Laverstock-type Ware 7 50 7

    South Hampshire Redware 5 66 13

    Southampton Sandy Ware 4 15 4

    MQfe2 1 7 7MQfe3 1 21 21

    MQ3 1 4 4

    MQ4 9 70 8

    Misc. Medieval 9 67 7

    Border Ware 4 24 6

    Post Medieval Redware 6 100 17

    Tudor Green 1 6 6

    Verwood 13 103 8

    Misc. Post Med 9 57 6

    Modern 1 5 5

    Total 622 6159

    Table 3: Pottery from the Iron Working Layer

    Ware Name SC SW ASW

    Roman 293 4086 14Mid Saxon OrganicTempered 1 6 6Flint and sand temperedware 2 6 3

    Wessex Coarseware 1 6 6

    Southampton Sandy Ware 1 29 29

    Total 298 4133

    Table 4: Pottery from Other Phase 4 Features

    POTTERY FROM LATER FEATURES

    A total of 157 sherds were recovered from later features, principally garden soil layers (table 5). The

    medieval pit 9002 only contained a small sherd of Chalk Tempered ware and sherds of Roman

    pottery, whilst the post-medieval pit 3063 only contained a single sherd of Flint and Sand Tempered

    Ware. The 38 sherds of Roman date are clearly residual and this is demonstrated by their small size

    (ASW: 9g). Sherds of most types are very small and this is typical of garden soil layers. The presence

    of sherds of Wessex Coarseware and glazed sandy wares of Laverstock and South Hampshire

    Redware types implies that this activity dates to at least the 13th

    century, whilst the presence of

    post-medieval types suggests this activity continued into at least the 17

    th

    century. A proper analysis

  • 8/8/2019 Report 10 Narrow Lane

    5/5

    of these layers may provide information on land use in different areas of the site through time, but

    such analysis would require full quantification of the post-medieval types present.

    Ware Name SC SW ASW

    Roman 38 359 9

    Mid Saxon Organic Tempered 1 12 12Flint and sand tempered ware 7 81 12Flint and sand tempered ware (Newburytype) 5 11 2

    Flint tempered with coarse sand and chalk 5 50 10

    Chalk tempered ware 1 3 3

    Wessex Coarseware 29 267 9

    Fine sandy ware 9 101 11

    FQ2 1 14 14

    Laverstock-type Ware 9 70 8

    Southampton Sandy Ware 1 4 4

    MQfe2 2 8 4

    MQ4 2 4 2Misc. Medieval 5 45 9

    Border Ware 1 5 5

    Post Medieval Redware 3 33 11

    Tudor Green 1 21 21

    Verwood 11 75 7

    Tin Glazed Ware 1 5 5

    Misc. Post Med "Lots" "Lots" N/A

    Modern "Lots" "Lots" N/A

    Unid. 1 3 3

    Total 151 1248

    Table 5: Pottery from Phase 5 Features

    CONCLUSIONS

    The bulk of the pottery is of Roman date and there are small quantities of intrusive material present

    in Roman layers. Phase 4 features not associated with the iron working layer are probably of Roman

    date, based on the ceramic evidence. The larger sherds of Anglo-Saxon pottery present in the iron

    working layer suggest that this is indeed of Anglo-Saxon date, with the types present demonstrating

    that it accumulated from, perhaps, the 7th

    /8th

    -10th

    /11th

    centuries. Later intrusive types are present

    from disturbance caused by later gardening activity which dates from at least the 13th

    -17th

    centuries.

    The later types present are all typical of medieval assemblages in Romsey.