report on assessment of male international airport privatization

33
Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization by Maldives Anti-Corruption Commission (Official E nglish tra nslation o f original Dhivehi report )  The assessment on the progress of operating and developing the airport together with the govt. started On 25 August 2010. The bid documents and other related papers were checked, revised and relevant persons in the Public Enterprises Monitoring and Evaluation Board ((PEMEB) of the Ministry of Finance were interviewed. Progress of events  As an announcement made by Invest ment Maldives in December 2008 seeking a par ty to operate Male International Airport failed to garner any attention from the public, a financial advisory agreement seeking professional advice on airp ort privatization was signed with International Finance Corporation on 28 July 2010. As per this agreement (annex 1), the purpose of the agreement to seek a partner to buy 49% of shares of MACL or a party to develop the airport together with MACL under private-public partnership for the GoM for a decided period, under a competitive bidding process. (The decision to handover the operations were made after RFQ stage.) In return, GoM was required to pay USD $15,000 to IFC on the day of signing the agreement. USD $ 15,000 was to be paid from the moment IFC starts work and USD $ 20,000 was to be paid upon submission of transaction structure report. Further, another USD $ 15,000 was required if IFC’s service period exceeded 12 months. Once the project was awarded, the bid winner too was required to pay IFC the higher amount between 1% of the project and USD $ 750,000.

Upload: maldivesleaks70

Post on 04-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 1/33

Report on Assessment of Male International Airport

Privatization by Maldives Anti-Corruption Commission

(Official English translation of original Dhivehi report ) 

 

The assessment on the progress of operating and developing the airport together with the govt.

started On 25 August 2010. The bid documents and other related papers were checked, revised

and relevant persons in the Public Enterprises Monitoring and Evaluation Board ((PEMEB) of 

the Ministry of Finance were interviewed.

Progress of events 

 As an announcement made by Investment Maldives in December 2008 seeking a party to

operate Male International Airport failed to garner any attention from the public, a financial

advisory agreement seeking professional advice on airport privatization was signed withInternational Finance Corporation on 28 July 2010. As per this agreement (annex 1), the

purpose of the agreement to seek a partner to buy 49% of shares of MACL or a party to develop

the airport together with MACL under private-public partnership for the GoM for a decided

period, under a competitive bidding process. (The decision to handover the operations were

made after RFQ stage.)

In return, GoM was required to pay USD $15,000 to IFC on the day of signing the agreement.

USD $ 15,000 was to be paid from the moment IFC starts work and USD $ 20,000 was to be

paid upon submission of transaction structure report. Further, another USD $ 15,000 was

required if IFC’s service period exceeded 12 months. Once the project was awarded, the bid

winner too was required to pay IFC the higher amount between 1% of the project and USD $

750,000.

Page 2: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 2/33

The bid documents and other necessary information under this agreement were prepared by

IFC. The following chart outlines the progress of the bid process.

1- IFC agreement 28/7/09

2- Transaction Structure Report

3- Announcement 6/10/09

4- EOI acceptance

5- Sending RFQ 23/12/09

6- Pre-qualification Application acceptance 17/1/10

7- Pre-qualification evaluation 20/1/10

8- Sending of RFP/IM 18/3/10

9- Bid opening 20/6/10

10- Bid Evaluation 24/6/10

11- Signing the agreement 28/6/10

Page 3: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 3/33

 

Transaction Structure Report

Since the senior officials associated with PEMEB were not available until the time of writing this

report, we could not get hold of the transaction structure report that IFC submitted to the GoM.

However, we have the IFC’s presentation of the transaction structure report. 

Looking at the information in this presentation (annex 2), the airport does not suit the standards

of the International Civil Aviation Organization. The GoM was advised that USD $ 377 was

required to upgrade the airport to meet those standards, airport development charge needed to

be applied, and that there were two ways of buying investment for the airport. One, selling the

shares and the other was making a concession agreement.

Thus, it was estimated that if 51% of MACL’s shares were to be sold the GoM will at net present

value receive a revenue of USD $203.9 Million as dividends and service charge. However,

according to the presentation, if a concession agreement is made, the occupier must pay an

occupancy fee and an estimated 5% of their income to the government. The net present value

of the GoM’s expected revenue under this concession is expected to be USD $ 243.6 million. 

EOI Phase 

The Ministry of Finance and Treasury on 6 October 2009 issued an announcement to seek

interested parties to buy MACL’s shares. In this announcement (annex 3) the GoM had said that

they would leave control of the airports company and restructure the building and agree for a

more flexible investment plan. The shortlisting criteria of parties submitting EOI (Expression of 

Interest), was said to be experience of serving more than 3 million passengers a year, and

financing and operating the airport. It was also mentioned, in relation to the initial announcement

that, a party could form a consortium with another party in order to achieve the mentioned

criteria. It was also mentioned that after the asseement, the shortlisted candidates would be

sent a Request for Qualification (RFQ) in December 2009 and a Request for Proposal would be

sent afterwards. Once the confidentiality agreement is signed and sent along with EOI, the party

Page 4: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 4/33

would get the opportunity to visit the venue and seek more information. The announcement

does not specify a deadline for submission of EOI.

Below are the details of parties that submitted EOI and their dates of submission.

Tepe Afken Airpoerts TAV (21/10/2009)

Informs that they currently operate 11 airports, serves 41 million passengers and the company

has a market value of USD $ 5 billion.

Flughafen Zurich AG (Unique) 29/10/2009

Operates 10 airports including (Zurich airport and Bangalore airport, serves 22.1 million

passengers and generates an income of USD $ 780 million a year and have won the best

airport in Europe for a second time in 2008.

However, they do not develop airports

GMR infrastructure Limited (30/10/2009)

The company has assets worth USD $ 2.98 billion, projects worth USD $ 9 billion are in

progress, is the designer, developer and operator of Rajeev Gandhi International Airport in

Hyderabad serving 6.2 million passengers and serves 22 million passengers in Delhi’s Indira

Gandhi International Airport. IN addition, they are also operating an airport in Istanbul Airport

that serves 5 million passengers. They also said that they would form a consortium as

mentioned in the RFQ and further claimed to be operating businesses in coal mining, highway

construction as well as other infrastructure development.

Aeroports de Paris Management (ADPM0 (30/11/2009)

Operates the airport in Paris, has invested and operates 30 airports from around the world and

serves a total of 130 million passengers. Also claims to generate revenue of Euro 2.5 billion.

Reliance Airport Developers Private Limited (30/11/2009)

Operates 5 regional airports in India and has formed a consortium with Mexico Airport operators

in 2007 to bid together. They also claim that the reliance group is worth USD $13.6 billion.

Larsen and Turbo Limited – Chennai 5/12/2009

Page 5: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 5/33

Claims to run different industrial businesses and worked in the infrastructure of airports in

Hyderabad, Bangalore, and Delhi of India and apart from road, harbor and power plant

infrastructure. The company is worth USD $ 7 billion. However, it is not known whether the

company operates airports.

Egis Projects, Aeroports de la Cote d’Azur and Mauritius Commercial Bank (MCB) Capital

Partners (9/12/2009)

The company’s assets are worth Euro 200 million, and operates 4 international airports

including Nice Airport in France. They also claim to have served 9 million passengers in this

airport.

SNC-Lavalian Inc/ Vienna International Beteiligungs Management GMHB on behalf of

Fulghafen Wein AG (Vienna International Airport VIE (19/12/2009)

It was informed that S.N.C was responsible for constructing and engineering International Airports at

Canada, Moscow, France, Spain, USA and Libya and also informed that V.I.E is in charge of Vienna

 Airport operations holding passenger traffic of 19.7 million and generates a revenue value of 548.1 million

Euros.

It is observed that there was no official attempt for registration of all the E.O.I applicants for this projected.

 As such, one of the above named, Larsen and Toubro Limited was not mentioned as one of the E.O.I on

the prequalification evaluation report. (Annex 6) But In this report, Incheon International Airport is listed

to have submitted E.O.I while there is no written evidence or that this company had ever submitted an

E.O.I. there is no available EOI from the company either. There’s no justif ication as to why Incheon

International Airport was listed as to have submitted EOI instead of Larsen and Toubro Limited.

Prequalification Process 

On 23rd December 2009, the previously mentioned submitters for E.O.I were shortlisted and a Request for 

Qualification was sent. (It is still unavailable to obtain the email sent from IFC regarding the RFQ)(Annex

4)It is mentioned in clause 1.2 that as the Government still haven’t concluded on the decision whether 

Male’ International Airport is to be operated under a share based privatization, or to lease (concession),

that the Government shall decide after the Prequalification process. Furthermore, it was mentioned that

Page 6: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 6/33

for those who pass through the FQ criterion, shall be prequalified and shall send “Request for proposal”

so that way they can be given the additional diligence for the preparation for the final bid. The deadline to

submit for prequalification process was 18:00 hours of 15th January 2010.

In RFQ clause 1.5, it says that those who were shortlisted E.O.I (even a consortium) is controlling a share

percent more than 5% of another shortlisted E.O.I (even a consortium), or if a director of a shortlisted

E.O.I (even a consortium) is controlling a share percent more than 5%, they cannot participate.

Furthermore, even those who are connected with anyone advising the Government on the project

proceedings are also barred from participating. Those involved in this project in advising the Government

were a technical consultancy firm, Halcro LLP (UK), a Legal firm Gide Layette Noel Law firm (France) and

from Maldives, there were Munawwar and Associates and Ernst and Young.

Furthermore, according to clause 1.4, those who were shortlisted can participate as a whole consortium

by joining in with an additional company or companies. They should have lead member who is assigned

by the consortium in representing, also that they could be assigned as financial investor or an AirportOperator.

The standards for evaluation of the prequalification applications as mentioned in clause 2.3 are listed

below.

Technical Criteria Candidate or in case of a consortium, at least 1 member of the consortium

must have within the past 10 years for a period of 5 years operated an

airport that serves more than 3 million passengers per year.

Financial Criteria 1 Candidate or in case of a consortium, the average annual turnover of the

financial investor for the past 5 years must be above USD $ 200 million.

Financial Criteria 2 Net worth must have been above USD $ 50 million every year during the

past 3years.

In case of a consortium, the net worth of the whole consortium must have

been above USD $ 100 million every year during the past 3 years

The net worth of the financial investor in the consortium must have been

above USD $ 50 million every year during the past 3 years.

The information required for evaluation based on the above points was supposed to be

according to the formats in RFQ annexes. Thus, Power of Attorney as per the RFQ, information

Page 7: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 7/33

forms of the candidates, financial information and experience form as well as pre-qualification

application form were required to be submitted. Other documents that were required along with

these forms was also mentioned clearly.

Request for Proposal (RFP) Phase

 An information memorandum inclusive of the request for proposal and information regarding the

project was sent on 18th March 2010 to the aforementioned 6 prequalified parties. (Annex 7

RFP) According to 1.2 of the RFP Male’ International Airport is being privatized under a

concession agreement (on to loan to be operated and developed for a specified period of time).

 According to 3.1 of the RFP the bid has to comprise of three parts. That is the legal bid,

technical bid and the financial bid. It was informed that within the evaluation the first to be

considered would be the legal bid. Those whose legal bids have been approved will pass to the

evaluation of their technical bid. Financial bid will be considered if the technical bid has passed

approval. As such 3.3.2 states that the evaluation of the technical bid would hold considerations

as specified in RFP Schedule 2’s Draft Concessional Agreement’s minimum technical

requirements and (MTR) its standards.

 As stated in 5.5.3 in approving the financial bid consideration is given to the net present valuethat is given after an annual 10% discount on of all government concessional fees. As follows,

the party that proposes the concessional fee with the greatest net present value would be

awarded the bid.

 Additionally when in view of the other specifications stated in the RFP, 6.6.2 states that the bid

successor is required to pay 1% of the total investment amount for the airport. In addition an

equal amount is deducted from the initial concession fee to be paid to the Maldivian

government. It is stated that the agreement must be signed within 15 days of being awarded bid

approval.

 According to 3.2.5, if the party is a consortium then the party within the consortium that is to be

responsible for operating the airport must own more than 5% of the consortium in shares. The

RFP states that for those wishing propose bids through RFP, the use and services of the date

Page 8: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 8/33

room would be available for purposes of analysis and obtaining further information, and that all

queries must be sent in writing to the Maldivian Government and additionally to IFC as well.

RFP provides complete detail regarding the content that is necessary to be included in every bid

and the documents that should be presented with the bid. Thus the following specifications are

required to be included in the legal bid;

Bid Form:- According to the sample on Schedule 4, Form 1

Bid Security:- According to the sample on Schedule 4, Form 2

Confirmation of Status:- According to the sample on Schedule 4, Form 3

Corporate Structure:- A report describing the corporate structure of the party proposing

the bid

Power of Attorney:- According to the sample on Schedule 4, Form 4

Report concerning Conflict Of Interest:- According to the sample on Schedule 4, Form 5

Initially proposed draft Concession Agreement:-According to Schedule 2

The specifics of the technical bid are based upon the specifics that need to be included in the

MTR of the draft agreement. The specifications that need to be included because of this are as

follows;

The strategic plan for development:- long term vision, means for raising capital for 

development, estimated traffic, strategy for expanding market and profitability, estimated

profits and expenditure, process for handling operation

Construction plan:- fulfillments to be met according to civil aviation regulations, terminal

building, airfield pavement, land acclamation, supporting services, landside development

Main plans for management:- safety plan, environmental plan, operational plan

The financial bid has to be presented according to the sample on Schedule 4’s Program 6. This

form as on the RFP is different from the forms presented on proposal. The RFP’s form does not

state the inclusion of a concession fee for oil. Instead it states that a percentage of total profits

will be paid to the government. The writing/email sent to notify the parties participating in the bidof the amendments made to this form has been as of yet unavailable from the IFC. According to

this form, the amounts for concession fee must be presented as stated below;

The amount payable for the initial concession fee before the bid it is handed over 

Page 9: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 9/33

The amount of USD 1.5 million payable as the annual concession fee (the amount stated

on the form)

The percentage payable to the government from profits excluding those obtained from

the sale of oil starting from the date of occupancy up till 2014

The percentage payable to the government from profits excluding those obtained from

the sale of oil starting from 2014 to the end of the contract

The percentage payable to the government from profits obtained solely from the sale of 

oil starting from the date of occupancy up till 2014

The percentage payable to the government from profits obtained solely from the sale of 

oil starting from 2014 to the end of the contract

The bid data sheet included with the RFP states that the last date for proposing the bid is at

17:00 of 13 June 2010. Also that the bid must be presented with a bid security of USD 750, 000,that is with the original document and three copies.

The memorandum that was set sent with the RFP (Annex 8) describes in detail the operation of 

the airport, the current situation, financial information and the legal information. In the

information given it is mentioned that in May 2007 a company called Dynatest was hired to do a

sustenance survey of the airport runway pavement and that the surveys indicated that 845

meters long area is below the ICAO’s (International Civil Aviation Organization) safety standards

and that although the airport is only 20 years old, that it would have to be repaved within 10

years’ time. Additionally Halcrow (one of IFC’s consultants on this project) stated on November 

2009 that when the condition of the apron was examined it was discovered that the drains of the

runway were damaged and that some of the drain covers did not have the required strength,

thus compromising the safety of parked air vessels.

In 2009 out due to Maldives Airport Company’s proposal to Maldives Civil Aviation Department

for obtaining Aerdome certification, an Aerodome audit was carried in which 53 points to be

addressed were noted including points such as the runway not being wide enough and the

safety zone at the end of the runway (R.E.S.A) failing to have adequate space.

The IM also states that the existing Terminal Building’s (International and Domestic together)

size is 12470 square meters which is smaller than IATA’s service level C standard facilities and

that there is not enough space south of the existing terminal, apron and taxi way therefore

requiring the construction of a new terminal on the east side of the runway along with an apron

and taxi way as well.

Page 10: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 10/33

In addition to the aforementioned information, information about the fact that the current fuel

farm is placed closer to the runway than the recommended safety standards, that the current

cargo terminal needs to demolished and a new one constructed due to the current cargo

terminal being timeworn and damaged, that the cosway bridging Hulhumale requires a new

connecting road to be built to link with the new terminal, that the sewage that is being emptied

into the sea currently has not been treated, as well as the fact that airport control is currently

being managed by the Airport Company was also stated. It was also noted that once the new

airport terminal is in service the Hulhumale Lagoon (near the seaplane terminal) would require a

 jetty to be constructed allowing for the docking of vessels.

 Amendments for the faults as dictated above were included in the minimum technical

requirements (M.T.R) for the development of the airport. As such the main clauses included are

as follows:

Demolition of the buildings towards the South of the Runway that are identified as

obstacles in the in the blueprints

Relocating the terminal to the East side: A terminal must 45000 square meters in size,

must have 11 Code C Stands and 6 Code E Stands out of which 4 Code E Stands and 1

Code C Stand must have an air bridge and also the building should be viable for at least

50 years of usage.

A V.I.P/C.I.P Terminal Building that has 42 000 square meters in floor size with one

Code C and one Code E stand, must be constructed

Laying of a fiber optical network for airport usage

   Airport’s ICT system: Information system, baggage system, check-in system, placing

information kiosk’s 

Changing the location of the M.N.D.F building

Apron: Be able to use for 25 years, meet the requirements of the ICAO, change the

drainage systems to meet the safety requirements, have the necessary power 

generation and communication infrastructure.

Have a taxi-way leading to the new apron: Being able to enter the new apron without

having to go the end of the existing runway and be able to use for another 20 years.

Have the necessary power generation and communication infrastructure.

Repairing the runway: Before the 2015, repair and upgrade to the necessary standards,

the 7600 square meter area indicated in the Dian Test report. The repaired area should

Page 11: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 11/33

be able to use for another 20 years. The drainage system should meet the necessary

standards and should be able to use for 50 years.

Road construction: Construct a road that leads from the East to the West of the runway.

This road (which estimated as to be 21000 square kilometers) should be able to use for 

20 years.

Land reclamation.

Make a new base for the ground handling.

Make a storage facility to keep the aircraft spare parts.

Relocating the existing fuel pump.

Relocate the fire station, construct a new building and develop the roads leading to the

new fire station

Build a harbor and develop the jetty

As per the security requirements, place fences around the airport and build a security

system.

In addition to this, other requirements and the details of those international standards and

Maldivian regulations that needed to be complied are included. Also in the annex 18, of the

draft agreement, the details of the level of the services that need to be provided at the

airport and the key-performance-indicators are included. According to estimations of I.F.C in

the Information Memorandum, to fulfill the requirements of the M.T.R a sum of 366.5 million

US Dollar is required. Also by 2014, to comply with the international and the Maldivian

regulations, a sum of 287 million US Dollar is needed.

The detail of the airport’s revenue and the traffic and included in the I.M. In this regard, there

are two different ways that the airport will be gaining the revenue. The revenue generated

from the traffic and the revenue generated from the non-traffic activities. In the traffic

revenue includes, landing fee, parking fee, navigation fee and the ground handling fee. The

total traffic revenue is less than 20% of the total. The non-traffic revenue includes

passenger service charge, fuel charges, rent charges and other revenue generations. It was

expected to have a 2.4 billion Rufiyaa by the end of 2008, of which 80% is from trading fuel.

Page 12: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 12/33

The parking fee is considerably higher than other airports in this region. But the fuel price is

cheaper than the others. By the end of 2009, it is expected to serve 2.6 million passengers

and handle 42,000 ton cargo. In addition the expected traffic details and different fees and

the rates are also mentioned. It also indicates that the ground handling charges will be

increased from January 2010.

In relation to this R.F.P, on 20 June 2010 3 parties submitted the bid proposal (Annex 9 Bid

receipt register). But in R.F.P the bid closing date is 13 June 2010 1700hrs. We are unable

to obtain the details of this change brought to the bid closing date and the email sent to the

parties from the I.F.C. The bidders are:

1. G.M.R Infrastructure limited / M.A.H.B

2. G.V.K / Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)

3. T.A.V / A.D.P.M (T.A.V and A.D.P.M, individually applied at the R.F.Q phase)

Bid Evaluation 

The bid evaluating committee comprises of:

1. Ali Shiyam: Economic Advisor of the President’s Office

2. Ahmed Nizam: Maldivian Air Taxi

3. Ahmed Mahreen: Regional Airport department

4. Ali Arif: Minister of Finance and Treasury

5. Abdulla Mohamed: Civil Aviation Department

In addition, the following took part as observers and technical advisors.

1. Mohamed Ibrahim: Managing Director of Maldives Airports Company Ltd2. Hussain Siraj: Board Director Maldives Airports Company Ltd

3. Ms. Ramatut Magagee: IFS

4. Ms. Nehaa Mehery: IFS

5. Mr. John D. Crothaz: Gide Loyrette Nouel

6. Mr. Fabian Lenteri Masa: Gide Loyrette Nouel

Page 13: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 13/33

7. Mr. William R. Milington: Halcrow Group

8. Mr. Christopher Penn: Halcrow Group

Legal bids presented

The three parties have submitted all afore mentioned documents as required in the legal bid

according to the RFS regulations. Looking at the corporate structure presented, GMR

consortium has 77% for the GMR Infrastructure Ltd and 23% for Malaysia Airports Holdings

Berhad. Unique Consortium has 80% for GVK Airport Developers Pvt Ltd and 20% for Zurich

 Airport International AG. Zurich Airport International AG is a 100% share holding subsidiary of 

Flughafen Zurich AG. T.A.V Consortium consists of 39.5% from T.A.V, 25.5% from A.D.P.M,

and 35% from Capital Advisors Partners Asia Pvt Ltd. (Anex 10 Corporate Structure)

 All three bids had passed the Legal Bid Evaluation and moved on to the technical evaluation.

(Anex 11 bid evalauation report)

TECHNICAL BID

 All three bids presented had passed the technical evaluation and gone to the financial

evaluation.

There was nothing that contradicted the technical requirements in all three bids. As per RFP

technical bid, all three had the necessary requirements as mentioned above.

The evaluation committee first looked at the GMR bid for the technical bid evaluation on 21st 

June 2010. The following points were noted from the evaluation.

1. GMR bid includes building a runway but has not specified a timeframe for it. The

agreement states in the 3.6 of the M.T.R that it should be finished before 2015.

However the evaluation committee did not see it as a point to fail the bid. It was said in

the report that the bids that were evaluated later were also similar to how the GMR had

presented it.

2. GMR had included in the operational plan, under seaplane operator’s responsibilities,

an emergency rescue plan. However in other parts of the agreement, fire extinguishing

Page 14: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 14/33

and emergency response is the responsibility of the renting party and therefore the

committee did not see it as a point to fail the bid.

3. Under 6.4 of the M.T.R, there has to be a ‘physical barrier’ to the area where the

seaplanes land so that no sea faring vehicles can enter it. GMR bid proposes that there

be buoys to mark the area. The evaluation committee decided that the M.T.R did not

specify what the ‘physical barrier’ should be and thus it is not against the requirements.

4. The drawings from the Unique GVK bid differed from the seaplane terminal and so the

matter was sent for clarification. Changing the seaplane terminal was not included in the

M.T.R. GVK replied that they had designed the terminal giving importance to the

comfort of the passengers to go from one place to another and therefore brought the

seaplane terminal in front of the airport terminal in the long term master plan. They also

said that if they are to do it, they will talk to all the necessary parties and do so only if 

there is no objection to it. Evaluation committee accepted the answer and so passed the

bid.

5. GMR bid’s Strategic development plan includes detail of the expenses of fuel trading

but because the expected expenses were not in the table on page 57, and due to the

estimated traffic volume for 2012 being lower than the 2009 actual value, and although

international traffic volume was greater than the estimate from IFC, the aeronautical

income was not increasing and therefore was sent to GMR for clarification.

GMR answered that the fuel trading expenses is included in the employees, utilities,

construction and other expenses details and that it has been sent. Also that theseaplanes have not been included in the domestic traffic volume and only land plane

passengers have been included in the Domestic Traffic Volume in page 12 of the bid.

The amount with the seaplane passengers included was given in the answer by GMR.

The evaluation report notes that the Evaluation committee accepted the answer and

decided that the bid was passed on 24th June 2010 with 3 votes for and 2 against.

In addition to this, we observed down the following points.

GVK/Unique bid proposes to reclaim land and make a road at the end of the runway and

instead of taking a safety area, to use the technology, which stops airplanes faster. They had

given different options for making the road at the end of the runway. The proposal was to make

the road using a jetty or a tunnel at the south end of the runway near the sea. The other two

Page 15: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 15/33

bids had proposed to take space from the south end of the runway for the road and safety area

and to reclaim and extend the runway from the north side.

In the technical requirements 3, airfield pavement should be made so that the apron can be

used for the next 25 years. Thus, it should be made up to the standards as said in F.A.A

advisory circular AC 150/5320-6E and I.C.A.O’s S.A.R.P.S annex 14 and I.C.A.O’s A.D.M.

However T.A.V/A.D.P.M bid’s page 40 says the duration is 20years. If the pavement is made as

per the F.A.A advisory circular AC 150/5320-6E, the pavement can be used for 20 years. The

other bids had no mention of this.

FINANCIAL EVALUATION

Since all three bids had passed the technical evaluation, the financial evaluations were done

next. The evaluation was done by referring to the net present value of the concession fee that is

paid to the government according to the R.F.P’s financial form. The form states that the

evaluation criteria will be based on the R.F.P.A’s baseline payment made to the government at

net present value. The details of the proposed concession fees are shown in the table below.

GMR/M.H.B Unique

 A/M.H.B

TAV/AD.P.M

Initial concession fee before handover 78 million

US dollar 

27 million

US dollar 

7 million US

dollar 

Percentage of the revenue gained other than from the oil

trade starting from the end of 2015 year contract.

1% 27% 31%

Percentage of the revenue gained other than from the oil

trade starting from the initial starting date till the end of 2014

year contract.

10% 9% 29.5%

Percentage of the revenue gained from the oil trade starting

from the initial starting date till the end of 2014 year 

contract.

15% 9% 16.5%

Percentage of the revenue gained from the oil trade starting

from year 2015 till end of contract.

27% 9% 16.5%

Page 16: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 16/33

 

 As such, I.F.C (International Finance Corporation) have calculated net present value revenue at a rate of 

240 million US Dollars rate for every year of the 25 years period. That is the revenue value of 180 million

US Dollars calculated for trade of oil and revenue value of 60 million US Dollars calculated for other trade

other than the trade of oil. Even though it’s mentioned on RFP’s 5.5.3 that net present value is estimated

by referring to I.F.C, it’s not mentioned exactly that this calculation’s real source comes from I.F.C. By

the end of year 2008, the revenue collected from Maldives Airports Company Limited (MACL) was 152.8

million US dollars from oil trade and another 38.1 million US dollars for trade generated from other trade,

together total revenue of 190.9 million US dollars.

It is predictable that from the calculations of IM that for every passenger of the estimated 2.5 passengers

for year 2008, there’s revenue of 75.1 for each and every passenger. And also from IM’s estimation for 

the backspace scenario for year 2010 was stated as 2.6 million passengers, as well as by the end of year 

2035, it is estimated that for every year there will be 5.1 million passengers. We can safely believe that

this calculation by IM for 240 million US dollar revenue as a prudent estimate.

From the above estimations, the net present value for the concession fee calculations are much higher for 

GMR consortiums, that is a net present value of 529.07 million US dollars. (Refer to annex 12, MPV

calculation) and furthermore, they have also offered to invest a value of 368 million US dollars for the

 Airport.

The second high concession fee was submitted by T.A.V/A.D.P.M bid, which was an amount of 483.45million US dollars together with their offer to invest 434 million US dollars for the Airport.

The Highest bid to invest on Airport was submitted by Unique A/G.V.K with an investment value of 594

million US dollar, but their net present value was 280.35 million US dollars only.

Thus, the bid was won by the GMR consortium by submitting a Net Present Value of the

highest concession fee.

Agreement

The agreement with the winning party, GMR was signed on 28th June 2010. (Annex 13-

 Agreement)

Page 17: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 17/33

Below mentioned are the key highlights of the agreement.

Leasing duration of the Airport is 25 years.

Air Traffic control and navigation services will be given by Maldives Airport Company Pvt

Ltd. Permitted to use all assets in Airport to gain economic profit.

Airport services must meet level C of IATA services.

The occupier does not have to take any responsibilities of the liabilities of Airports

Company Pvt Ltd.

Reports must be submitted with fees payable in every four months.

Current Employees can be terminated only after 2 years from the day of signing the

agreement.

Sea Planes will be operated by the current service providers. Fees can be charged according to the following.

o Fees charged by government

Passenger service charge

Air traffic fee

o Fees charged by occupier.

U SD 25.00 from every passenger from per passenger as Airport

Development Charge.

USD 2.00 per passenger as Insurance charge Landing fee

Parking fee

Ground handling charges

Aero Bridge Fee ( USD 100.00 per usage)

Fuel charges

Commercial revenue

Rent from leasing of property

Seaplane landing fees and other aeronautical fees.

In addition to these, all the aeronautical fees will be adjusted to inflation based on US consumer 

price index in every 3 years.

Page 18: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 18/33

Below are the details of share profits from MACL to the Government of Maldives in the previous

3 years. (Extracted from budget reports) 

2008 2009 2010

171,506,451.00 MVR 65,525,085.00 MVR 62,790,164.00 MVR

Since 2008 the revenue of MACL has gone down significantly. Considering 2008’s dividend’s

revenue to remain the same for the next 25 years, when discounting the revenue’s 10%, the

present value is identified as 121.14 million US Dollars (171.5/12.85x9.077). In GMR’s bid, the

figure indicated as the expected revenue to be generated, considered to remain the same for 

the next 25 years, when discounted at the rate of 10%, the present value is identified as 973.91

million US Dollars. (Annex 15). Therefore on a concession basis by handing the airport’s

management, the government will be able to gain a greater financial gain.

Till the time of compiling the report, we have not received some of the emailed from IFC. (Annex

14)

Though there are some minor issues in the technical bid evaluation (which does not affect the

outcome of the result), the whole process of the bidding process has undergone on a

professional basis.

Conclusion 

Page 19: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 19/33

ފް ނު ެނ ުނ ު ުރކް މުާ ބެހޭގޮތު ބ ްނބިެލެލ ުމ މާލ ޭ އިނ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޕ ްރ ައިވެޓައިޒ

 ކަނ ްތ ަކގުެ ިޕރ ޓޯް

25 ނ ީމާލ ޭ އިނ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލް  އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ސަރ ުކާރ ާގުޅިގެން  ިނހ ގްާ ތ ަރ ައްޤީކުރ ާނ ެ ފ ަރ ާތ އެް ހޯދ ުމގުެ މަސައްކަތ ް ގޮސްފ ައިވާގޮތ ް ބަލ ަނ ް ފ ށެު

ިވާމިގޮތ ުން  ިނމ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ިނ ޭން ގްެސ ޕ ްލބިަ އ ްކެނ ްޓޕަރ ްރ ައިސެސް ޮނމ ޓިަ.ގައވ2010ެެއޮގަސޓްް ގުޑައ ރ ިނ ެނއ ގް ޑްް އވެެއުލޭޝަނ ް ޯބ

ާޗލަ ެކްކށޮް ދ ިރ ސާާ)ީބ.ީއ.އމެް.ީއ.ޕ ީ( އެއާގޅުޭ ތ ަފ ާތ ު ލ ިޔ ުނ ްތ އަް ބ ަނމު ްޓްތ ަކއާި ބިޑްތ ަކާއި ކށޮް ކަމާގޅުެ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ކަާބިޑްޑޮކިއ

 . ސުވާލ ުކުރ ުނވެެ ވެެއ

  ގާނ ދ ިޔ ަގޮތ ްކަނ ހްި

ޑިސެމްބަރ 2008

ޅިގެނ ް ހިނ ާނގް ެ ފ ަރ ާތ ެއްހޯދ ުމށަް ކުރ ިމާލޭ  ިނއ ްޓނަރ ަނޝޭ ަލް  އެއޕާރ ޓރޯް ސަރ ުކގާުގއަި އިވްނެސޓްް މޯލ ްޑިސެވިނއް ް ެނގި ް އެކަށގީެވްާނ ތ ަރ ުޙީބއެް ލ ިބިފ ައި ވުނާތ ީ ިމ ޭނނި ސްް ކޯޕ ަރ ޝޭައާިނއިނ ްޓަނ ޭޝަނ ަލ ްމަސައކްަށަްތ ފ ަނ ްނ ީ ލ ަފ ާހޯދ ުމށަްއިޢްލ ާނ ާ ގުޅ ފ ައ

ިމ)1ެނއެ ސްްކ(.ެވއެގއަި ސޮއިކޮށްފ ައވ2010ެިޖުލ އ28ިަރ ީ ސވާރސިް އެގްރ ީމެނ ްޓއެްއަިގވައޒިަދ ެމެދ ު ފ ައިނ ޭނ ްޝަލ ް އޑެް

ުނލޫ ް މޯލ ވިްޑސްް އެއޕަރ ޓޯްކްސޮމްޕ ގީނެެވާގޮތު މ ްނިއެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓގްެ މަޤޞްައެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓްގއަި ްސާ%49ދ ކަީ ވާދ ަވެރ ި ބީމަލގުެ އުސ ހިއ

ްނނަ ާނ ެ ފ ަރ ާތ އެް ހޯދ ުނ ް ބަޕްލ ކިް ޕ ްރ ައވިެގ ެމް ނ ުވަތަ  ުނލޫ ް އ އެލ ް އއާި ގގިުޅެނ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކށޮް. ީސ.އޭ.ްޓ ޕ ްނޓާ ޝަރިޕް އ ެގުސ

ެވެއިދ ިނ މުެ ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ހޯދ ަަކޑނައޅެޭ މުއްދ ަތ ަކށަް ހިނ ްގާނ ެ ފ ަރ ާތ އެް ާލވަ ުކޮށްގެން  ިނހ ގްާ ގޮތ ށަް ނ ިނ ްމާފ ައިވަނ ީ(.އ ިއު.އާރ ު އެފ ްބަޔ ކަާ ޙ ކ

 ).އވެެ ސްޓޭޖަށްފ ހަު

ް-/15,000ބަދ ަލ ުގއަި އެގްރ ަނމީ ްޓްގއަި ސކިޮއުރ ާ ދ ުވހަު ސަރ ުކާރ ުނ ް އައިއެފ ސްީ އަށ

ޫ.ޔ 

ް.ެސއ

ެއަި.ޮލޑ ދ ަރ ައްކަނ ްޖހެެވެއ .އަދ ި އ

ްީގެ.އެފ   ސ

ެސް.ޔޫ-/15,000ޓީމގުެ މަސައްކަތ ް ފ ެށުމުނ ް ަރ ިޕ ޓޯް ހުށަހެޅުމުނ ް.އ ަރަދ ި ޓްރާ ސްނެކްޝަނ ް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ރ ެސް-/20,000ޑޮލ އ ޔ ޫއ

ެވެ  ަރ ައްކަނ ްޖެހެއ އަި.ޑޮލ ދ ަތކް ް ކުރ ަނ ްޖހެޭ މުއްދ ަތ ު.އެފ ް.މގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް އ ިނއީ ް މަސައ މަހަށްވުރ ެ އިތ ުރ ުވެއްޖެނ މަަ މަހަކށ12ްަ ސ

ެސް.ޔ ޫ-/15,000  ސީއށަް ޕ ްރ ޮޖެކްޓގްެ.އެފ ް.ްޓ އެވޑޯް ކުރ ުމުނ ް ބީލ ަނ ް ކާމިބާޔުކުރ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ްވސެް އއަިޕ ްރ ޮޖކެް.ޑޮލ ދ ަރ ައްކަނ ްޖހެެވެެއ.އ

ެވެ)ދ ެޢަދ ަދ ުނ ްކުރ ެ ބޑޮު ޢަދ ަދ އެް(ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރ -/750,000 ނ ުވަތ ަ%1އަގގުެ  .ދ ައްކަނ ްޖެހެއ

ަނމު ްޓްތ ަކއާި މަޢްލ ޫމާތ ުތ ށަް ތ އަް މިގޮތ ުން. ީއސްނނި ެވެ.އެފ ް.ޔ ާރ ުކޮށްފ ައިވާނ ީ އއަިމިއެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓގްެ ދ ަށުނ ް ބީލ ަމށަް ބޭނު ވްާނ ބިޑްޑޮކިއ

ާނވެަ ވެެއ ްނނަ  ިވގނެައަޑިގ  .މިބީލ ަމގުެ ކަނ ްތ އަް ެނގް ސޮގްފ ައިގާވޮތ ް ތ ިރ ީގައިމވިާ ޗ ޓާރުނ ް އ

 ީސ.އެފ ް.އއަި

އެގްރ ީމަނ ޓްް

28/7/09

ޓްރ ާނ ްސެކްޝަނ ް

  ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ާ ރ ިޕ ޓޯް

އިޢްލ ާނ ް

ކުރ ުނ ް

6/10/09

ައއި.އޯ.ީއ

 ބަލ ައިގަނުތް 

ކއިު.އެފ ް.އާރ ު

ފ ޮނ ުވުނ ް

23/12/09

ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް

އަލިގަތ ުނ ް ަނޝޭ ް ަބ އެޕ ްލ ިކ

17/1/10

ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް

އިވެލ ުއޓޭް ކުރ ުނ ް

20/1/10

އަިއ/ޕ ީ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު

އމެް ފ ޮނ ުނވު ް.

18/3/10

ބޑިް ހުޅުވުނ ް

20/6/10

ބޑިް އިވެލ އުޭކްޓުރ ުނ ް

24/6/10

އއެްސަބްވގުަ

 ސޮއިކުރ ުނ ް

28/6/10

Page 20: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 20/33

 ޓްރ ާނ ްސެކްޝަނ ް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ރ ަރ ިޕ ޓޯް

އަި ެނމު ށަް ރ ިޕ ޓޯް ލ ިޔ މުާ ހަމަޔ ށަް އ ަރ ިޕ ޓޯް ޕ ީއީއމެްގީެބ.އެފ ް.އަޅގުަޑނ  ސީ ިނއ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ހުށަހޅެި ޓްރ ާނ ްސެކްޝަނ ް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ރ

ެވެކަމާބހެޭ އަބއެް އިބްސޭފ ުޅުނ ް ނޫ އުޅްވާތ ީވެ ަނވ ީ އަި.ފ ްނނެ ަގޮތ ް ނ ުވެފ ައ  ސީ ިނއ ް ޓްރ ާން ކެސްޝަނ ް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ރ ަރ ިޕ ޓޯް.އެފ ް. ނ ަމަވސެް އ

ެވެ  ެނމު ށަް ހޯދ ިފ ައިވެއ  ނ ްޓޝޭަގުނައވިާ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ށަް ބަލ ާއިރ ުމިޕ ްރ ސެެ)2އެނ ެކސްް(.ހުށަހޅެި ޕ ްރ ެސެނ ްޓޭޝަނ ް އަޅގުަޑނަނގޮ ައިޒޝޭަގްެނ މިނ ގްަނ  ަނޝޭ ް އ އ ްށެއޕަރ ޓޯް ނ ުފ ެތ ޭކަމަށއާި މިމިނ ގްަޑނށަް ގެނ ައުމށަްއިނ ްޓނަރ ަނޝޭ ަލ ް ސިވިލ ް އޭވިއ ަނ377ްަޑ މިލ ިއ

ޭނހެ ެކަމަށއާި ދ ެގޮތ ަކށަް އެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އިނ ްވސެް ޮލޑް ބ ަރޭނު ވްާނކެނަމަށއާި މިކަމށަް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޑިވެލ ޮޕ ްމަނ ޓްް ޗ ާޖއެް ނ ަގަނ ްޖ ޓްމަނ ްޓްޔ ޫއެސ

ި އަ  ގްއޮތ ކަީ ހއިްވާސިކުނ ް ކަމަށާއ ާނދި ެކަމަށއާި ެއ  . ނެ ގްއޮތ ކަީ ކޮޝެސްނަނ ް އެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓއެް ހެދު ކްނަމށަް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ލ ަފ ާދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެގެނ ެވ

ގްެލ. ީސ.އޭ.އމެްމިގޮތ ުނ ް ަރވރާިހިއސްާ ވިއްކާފ ިނ މަަ ސަރ ުކާރ ަ%51ެއ ކެނަމށަް ްށ ޑިވިޑެނ ްޑއާި ޕ ެނސަ ްޖސ ބިޭލ ި  ސްޗ ާޖގްެ ގޮތ ުގައ

ަނޝެ ް އެގްރ ެނމީ ްޓއ203.9ްެލ ަފ ާކުރ ވެޭ އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ްޓްވެލި އުއކަީ މިލ ަނއި ް ޔ ޫއެސް ޮލޑ ަރ ުކަމަށއާި ނަ ވަމެސް ޮނކ ްސ

 ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ލ ިބޭނ ެކަމށަް%5ތ ަނ ށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނ ގީެހަދ ައިފ ިނ މަަ ޙަވާލ ވުާ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ޙަވާލ ުވުމށަް ފ ީއއެް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ލ ިބޭނެ މަކަށއާި އަދ ި

ސްނޝެަގްެނ އުސޫލ ުނ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ލ ބިޭކެނަމށަް ލ ަފ ާކުރ ވެޭ އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ.ލ ަފ ާކުރ ެވޭކަމށަް ޕ ްރ ެސެނ ްޓޭޝަނު އަގވިެވެެއ މިގޮތ ުނ ް ޮކ .މިލ ަނއި ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ ކ ަރަމަށްވެއވ243.6ެެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެސެނ ޓްް ވއިެލުއކަީ

 އއަި މަރ ުހަލ ާ.އޯ.ީއ

ާ ްނަނގ ަނ ް ޝައުޤުވެރ ވިާ ފ ަރ ާތ އެްއެއޕަރޯ ސްްޓ ކމޮް ނ ޭނ ްސް ެނއ ޑްް ޓްރ ެޒަރ ީއިނ ް މޯލ ްޑިސްްވމިނ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ި ެ އިޙްސ ޕ ެނ ީ ލ ިމިޓެޑްގ

ެވ2009ެއޮކްޓޯބަރ 6އިޢްލ ާނ ް ކޮށްފ ައިވަނ ީހޯދ ުމށަް ެނޕް ގީެ ކޮނ ްޓްރ ލޯްމއިި)3ެނއ ެކސްް. (ގައ ޢްލ ާނ ުގއަި ސަރ ުކާރ ުން  އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ކޮމ

ެވެދ ޫކށޮް އެތ ަނ ް ބްައވްާސކެނަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ ަނމް ްޓް ްލޕ ޭނ ަކށަް ެއ ަލބްި  ިނއ ްވެސްޓ ެނގި ް.ރ ިސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ކަރށޮް ފ ްލ ެކްސ ާނލް ާ ގުޅ މިއިޢ

ނަީ)އއަި.އޯ.ީއ(އެކްސްޕ ްރ ަނޝެ ް އޮފ ް އިނ ްޓްރ ެސޓްް ހުށަހޅަާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ށަް ޝޯޓްލ ިސޓްް ކުރ ުމުގއަި ބަލ ާނ ެ މިނ ގްައެޑންކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ވިައ

ސަޕެނ ްޖަރ ްނނު ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ފ ައިނ ޭނ ްސްކށޮް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކށޮް ހިނ ްގުމގުެ ތ ަޖުރ ިބާހުރ ުމވެެމިލ އ3ަިއަހަރ ކަު އަދ ި. ނ ަށްވުރ ެ ގިނަ 

ސނޮކއިޯޓަމްއެއގްެ ގޮތު އަިގ ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ެވިދ ާނ ެ ކަމަށްވެސް ުނބ ެފ ައިއެވވެެ .މިނ ގްަޑުނ ޙާސިކްލުރ ުމަށްޓަކއަި އެހެނ ްފ ަރ ާތ ކަާ ގުޅިގެން 

ގއ2009ިަޑިސެމްބަރ )ކއިު.އެފ ް.އާރ ު(ލ އަި ޝޯޓްލ ިސޓްް ކުރ ވެޭ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކށަް ރ ިކުއެސޓްް ފ ޯ ކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ްމިމިނ ގްަޑނށަް ަބ

ެވެ  އާއކެު ކޮނ ްފ ެނޑި ްޝިއަލ ިޓީ.އޯ.ީއ.ފ ޮނ ވުޭކެނަމަށއާި އޭގެފ ަހުނ ް ރ ކިުސެއޓްް ފ ޯ ޕ ޮރ ޮޕ ޯސަލ ްއއެް ފޮ ވުނޭނ ެކަމަށް ުނބ ެފ ައިވ އައި

ެވެއެގްރ ީމެނ ްޓްގއަި ސކިޮއށޮް ހުށަހޅެު އަި.މުނ ް ތ ަނ ށަް ޒިޔ ާރ ަތ ްކށޮް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ހޯދ ުމގުެ ފ ުރ ުސަތ ު ލ ިބޭނ ެކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައިއެވ މިއިޢްލ ާނ ުގ

ަނކާ ް ފ ާހަގަކުރ ެވެ.އޯ.ީއ .ައއި ހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖހެޭ އެނ ްމެފަ ގުެހ ތ ާރ ީޚއެް ދ ީފ ައިނ ުވ

ެނގި ް ީއމިއިޢްލ ާނ ާ  .ވއީަނވެެއއަި ހުށަހޅެި ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކއާި ހުށަހޅެި ތ ާރ ޚީް ތ ިރ ީގއަި ިމ.އޯ.ގުޅ

ިނ11ް ެސް.ބއިިލަނ ް ޔ 5ޫމާކޓެް އަގގުެ ގޮތ ުނ ް ނ ް ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ްނ ށަް ިދޚ ުމަތ ްދ ޭކަމަށއާިމިލ އ41ަިގާފ ަރ ާތ ެއްކަމަށއާިއެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހ ޑޮލ ަރ ުގެ.އ

 .ލ ޫމާތ ުދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެކުނ ްފ ުނ ޏްެކްއަމށަް މޢަު

Page 21: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 21/33

ެވެ(އެއޕަރ ޓ10ްޯ މިލ ަނއި 22.1ްހިނ ގްާ ފ ަރ ާތ ެއްކަމަށއާި އަހަރ ކަު.)މީގެތ ެރ ޭގއަި ޒިއުރ ކިް އެއޕަރ ޯޓއާި ބެނ ަލގް ޫރ ގުެ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިމެނ ެއ

ުނރަ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ް ދ ޭކަމށަް އަދ ި އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ގޮތ ުގއަި އަހަރ ކަު ަރ ިބޭކަމށަާ.ެސއް.މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔ 780ޫޕ ަސަނ ްޖ ަޅުޮލޑ ލ ިއ ޔ ޫރ ަޕ ގްެ އެނ ްމެރ ަގ

ެވ2008ެވަނ ަފ ަހަރ 2ުއެއޕަރ ޯޓގްެ މަޤމާު  .ގއަި ހޯދ ާފ ައިވާކަމށަް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވެއ

ެވެ  . ނ ަމަވސެް މިފ ަރ ާތ ކަީ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކުރ ާފ ަރ ާތ އެް ނ ޫނ ެއ

ެސް.ިލބ ަނއި ް ޔ 2.98ޫކުނ ްފ ުނީ އަިގ  މިލ ިއަނ 6.2ްބިލ ިއަނ ް ޑޮލ ަރ ގުެ މަޝްރ ޢޫު ކުރ ިއަށްދ ާކަމަށއ9ިާހަރ ުމުދ ާ ހުރ ިކަމަށއާިޑޮލ ަރ ގުެ.އ

ޭނންި ކްސށޮް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކށޮް ިނއަ ްކށޮް ފ ައ ުނރަ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭ ހައިދ ަރ ުއާބާދ ގުެ ރ ަޖވީް ގާނ ްދީ  ިނއ ޓްަޝޭނރަނ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޑިޒ ހިނ ގްާޕ ަސެނ ްޖ

ިނއް ްފ ަރ ާތ ްކަމަށއާި ދ ިއްލ ގީެ އިނ ްދ ިރ ާގދަނ ީ ިއ .މިލ ިއަން  ސަޕެނ ްޖަރ ްނނު ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައވިެވެެއ22 ނ ްޓނަރ ަނޝޭ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޯޓ

އަި.އެފ ް.އާރ ު.މއިިލަން  ސަޕެނ ްޖަރ ްނނު ށަް ޙިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭ އެއޕަރ ޯޓއެް ހިނ ްގާކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައވިެވެެއ5މީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ް އިސްތަ ބްނުލް އަިގ ވސެް ިއުކ ގ

ެވެބުނ ާގޮތެ ގްެއ މަތ ިނ ް ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއމަް ާނލާ ެ ކަމަށްވސެް ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ ުލކެ ަވ މގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ހަކަތ ައއާި ކޯލ ްނ ެގުމއާި ހވިައޭމަގުހެދ ުމގުެ އިތ ުރ ށަް.އ

ެވެ   .އެހެނ ެނހްި  ިނއ ްފ ްރ ާސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ބ ަރިނ ާ ކުރ ުމގުެ ވިޔ ަފ ާރ ީކުރ ާ ކަމަށްވސެް ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ

ވުނަތ ަ ހިނ ްގާކަމަށއާި އެތ ަނ ްތަ ނުްނ30ޕ ެރ ސިް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިނ ގްާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްކަމަށއާި ދ ުނ ިޔ ގޭެ އެކިތ ަނ ްތ ުނނަ ް އެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އިނ ްވެސްޓްކށޮް

ުނރަ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައިއެވވ130ެެ ިވ2.5ެއަދ ި.މިލ ިއަން  ސަޕެނ ްޖ ެވެބިލ ަނއި ް ޔ ޫރ ޯ އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ގޮތު އަގިލި ކޭބަމަށްވެސް ުނބ ެފ ައ  .އ

އ2007ިަ ސަރަ އަހްދ ީ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިން ކާގަމަށއާި މެކްސކިޯ އެއޕަރޯ ހ ްޓިނ ްގާފ ަރ ާތ ާއކެު އެއޕަރ ޯޓްތ ަކށަް ގުޅިގެނ ް ބިޑްކުރ ުމށ5ްައިނ ްޑިގާެއ ގ

ެސް.ިލބ ަނއި ް ޔ 13.6ޫއއެްސަބްވެފ ައިކާވަމަށއާި ރ ިލ ެނއަ ސްް ގްރ ޫޕ ގްެ  .ޮލޑ ަރ ގުެ އަގުހުރ ިކަމަށްވެސް ުނބ ެފ ައިއެވވެެ.އ

ބާދ ުމަގއާި ފ ާލ ަމއާި ޕ ަވޕަރ ާނލް ޓްް ޢިމާރ ާތ ްކުރ ުމގުެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ސިނ ޢާީ އެކިމަސައްކަތ ްތ އަް ކުރ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ެއްކަމަށއާި އިނ ްޑިއގާެ ހައިދ ަރ ުއާ

ބިލ ަނއި 7ްމުމްބާއގީެ އެއޕަރ ޯޓްތ އަް ޢިމާރ ާތ ްކުރ ުމގުެ މަސައްކަތ ް ކޮށްފ ައިވާނ ެކަމަށއާި ކުނ ްފ ުނ ގީެ އގަުދ ިއްލ ީ އަދ ިބެނ ަލގް ޫރ ު

ެސް.ޔ ޫ  .ކށަް ނ ެތ ވެެޭގއެއަޓޯޕްރ ހިނ ގްާ ކަމއެް އެނ  ނ ަމަވސެް މިފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް.ޑޮލ ަރ ށަް އަރ ާކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައވިެވެެއ.އ

އެއޕަރ ޓޯްިނއ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިގްނާކަމަށއ4ިާޔ ޫރ ގޯެ ހަރ ުމުދ ާހުރ ި ކުނ ްފ ުން އެޏްކަމަށއާިމިލ ިއަނ 200ް ސީްނ ފ ްރ ާން ގްސެ

ުނރަ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ީފ ައވ9ާިހިނ ްގާފ ަރ ާތ ްކަމަށއާި އެއޕަރ ޯޓްއިނ ް  .ކަމށަް މަޢްލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެމއިިލަން  ސަޕެނ ްޖ

Page 22: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 22/33

ެން.އސެް ސޮމކްޯ ފ ްރާ ސްްނ ސްޕ ިނއެް  ޔޫ.އ ީ ެނކ ޑެާ ިވާލ އިބީާއަިގ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޢިމާރ ާތ ކްުއޭ.ެސއް. ީސ އަކ ރ ުމގުެ މަސައްކަތ ްކޮށްފ ައ

އަި.ފ ަރ ާތ ެއްކަމަށއާި ީވ ީ އިވެނ ާ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ިނހ ގްާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްކަމަށއާި.އ ުނރަ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭކަމަށއ19.7ިާީއ އަކ މިލި ނައ548.1ްމިލ ަނއްި  ސަޕެނ ްޖ

.ޔ ޫރ ގޯެ އާމްދ ަނ ީ ލި ކޭބަމށަް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެ

ަނކާ ް ފ ާހަގަކުރ ވެެވެެއ.އޯ.އއަި ހުށަހޅެި ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކގުެ ީއ.އޯ.ޓށަް ީއމިޕ ްރ ޮޖކެް މިގޮތ ުން.އއަި ރ ެޖިސްޓއަރއެް ބަލ ަހައްޓާފ އަި ނ ުވ

ަނޝޭ ް ރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައި އީ  ވިއެލ ުއ އއަި ހުށަހޅެި ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކގުެ ލ ިސޓްްއަިގ މަތ ީގައިއވެާ ލ ސާރަން  ެނއ ޑްް ޓބރާޯ ލ ިމިޓެޑގްެ.އޯ.ޕ ްރ ިކިލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް

ެނޕް ީގެ ަނނ ް ީއ)6ެނއެ ސްްކ. (ެވ ނ ަމެއްނެ އެެތ އއަި ހުށަހެޅިކަމށަް.އޯ. ނ ަމަވސެް މިރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައި ިނއ ްޝޯން  ޓްނިއނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ކޮމ

ެވެ  ެވެއއަި ހުށަހެޅިކަމއެް.އޯ. ނ ަމަވސެް މިނ ަނ ް ކިކާޔުނ ުނފް ްޏަކުނ ް ީއ.ލ ިޔ ެފ ައިއެވ ުނކަ ް އެކޭގނަށްނ ެތ ެއ އަދ ި އެފ ަދ ަ.އެއްވސެް ލ ިޔ ިޔކެ ުމ

ޯނޝްް  ިނއ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލް  އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ކޮމްޕ ގީނެެ ނ ަން.ިއ އެއްފ ެނ ިފަ އެްއސެްވ ނު އެވވެެއަ.އޯ.ީއ ލ ސާރަން  ެނއ ޑްް ޓބާރޯގެ ަދބ ަލ ުގއަި އިނ 

 .ައއި ހުށަހެޅިކަމށަް ޖަހާފ ައިވަނ ީ ކއީްކެވަމއެް ގނެއޭކަށްނ ެތެ ވެެއ.އޯ.ީއ

 ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް މަރ ުޙަލ ާ

ަންގއަި ރި އުކެސޓްް ފ 2009ޯޑިސެމްބަރ 23ޝޯޓްލ ިސޓްް ކުރ ވެިރ ާތ ްތ އަްފ ަހުށަހޅެިއއަި.އޯ.ީއމަތ ީގއަި އވެާ ކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝއަި(.ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ައވިެވެެއ ިލއެ ް އަދ ިވަނ ީ ލ ިބޭގޮތ ް ނ ުވެފ ައިއެެވ.އެފ ް. ީސ އިނ ް އާރ ު.އެފ ް.އ މާލ ޭ)4އެނެ ސްްކ(.)ެވކއިު ފ ޮނ ވުި އީމ

ްޔއު ައްދ ެނގީ ްތ ޯއިނ ްޓނަރ ަނޝޭ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޕ ްރ ައވިެއަޓިޒްކުރ ާނ ީ ހިސްއއިާވކްަ ތް ުވަތ ަ ތ ަނ ް ހިނ ަނގް ް ކ ނޯ ަނޝެ ް(ިގއެނ  އަދ ި)ކޮނ ްސ

.މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައވިެވެެއގއ1.2ިަކަމށަްޕ ްރ ޮލކި ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް މަރ ޙުައާލަށްފ ހަު ވަކިގޮތ އެް ިނނ ްމާނ ެާކމަމަށއާި ނަ ވަމސެް ސަރ ުކާރ ުން  ުނނ ިނ ް

ރ ިކުއެސޓްް ފ ޯ ޕ ްރ ޮޕ ޯސަލ ްއއެް ފ ޮނ ުވޭނ ެކަމަށއާި އެފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކށަްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ައިކށޮްރ ާތ ްތ އަް ޕ ްިއުކއަގވިާ ކްރ ައިޓީރ ިއާއިނ ް ފ ާސްވާފ ަ.އެފ ް.މިއާރ ު

ެވެ  ަން.ފ ައިނ ަލ ް ބިޑްތ ައްޔ ާރ ުކުރ ުމށަް ބޭނު ވްާނ އިތ ުރ ު ޑިއުޑިލ ިޖެނ ސްް ހެދ ުމގުެ ފ ުރ ުސަތ ު ފ ޯރ ުކޮށްދ ޭނ ެކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައިވެއ ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝ

ަނޝޭ ް ހުށަހެޅުމގުެ އެނ ްމެފ ހަު ތ ާރ ީޚކަީ ެވ18:00ެެގ2010ެނޖ ުއަރ 15ީއެޕ ްލ ިކ  .އ

ިވާޮނކ ްސޯޓއިައްމަކުނ ް/ެސވްފ ަރ ާތ ަކުނ ްގވިައާގޮތ ުނ ް ޝޯޓްލ ިސްޓްކުރ ެވިފ ވިއަާ އއ1.5ްެކިއގުެ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ޝޯޓްލ ިސްޓްކުރ ެވިއަފގްެ/އަށްވުރެ  ިނގ ަހިސްާއ ކޮނ ްޓްރ ޯލ ުރކް ާނ މަަ ނ ުވަތ ަ ޝޯޓްލ ިސްޓްކުރ ެވިފ ައވިާ ފ ަރ ާތ އ5ްެ%ސްނޮކޯޓިއަމއްެގްެއ/އެހެނ ްފ ަރ ާތ ެއގްެ ކޮނ ްސޯޓއިައްމެއ

ެވެކށަް ވާނ މަަކޮނ ްސޯޓިއމަްއެއގްެ ޑައިރ ެކްޓަރ ަ/ްއ ޝޯޓްލ ިސޓްް ކުރ ެވިފ ައވިާ އެހެނ ްފ ަރ ާތ ެއގްެޑައިރ ެކްޓަރ ެ .އެފ ަރ ާތ ަކުނ ް ކުރ ިމައްޗ އެް ނ ުލ ޭނވެ ެއ

ެވެ  ްޗއަ ެއް ުލނ ޭނވެ ެއ .އަދ ި މގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ްވސެް ދި ހެވިސަރ ުކާރ ށަް މިޕ ްރ ޮޖެކްޓްގއަި ލ ަފ ާދ ޭ ފ ަރ ާތ ަކުނ ް ހިއްސވާާ ފ ަރ ާތ ަކަށްވސެް ކުރ ިމ

ކިްނަލް  ސްނޮކަލ ޓްެސްީނ ފ މރާް ހަލ ްކްރ ޯ ީގެސ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ގނިއިރ ިވޭސިލ ާތ ު.އެފ ް.މިޕ ްރ ޮޖެކްޓްގއަި ދ ިވެހިސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ލ ަފ ާދ ިނ މުުއަިގ އަިއ ެގ ޓެކ

އަންވަރު  ެނއ ޑްް ސެއޯސިއޭޓގްެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް.އެލ ް.އެލ ް ޓް ޮއެލް  އާިއ ރ ާއްޖގޭެ ުމ ނެ ފ ިއާ ްރ ާން ގްެސ ލ ީގަލ ް ފ މާރއްެކްއަމުގައވިާ ގޑިް ލޮ އެޔ ޕ ީއ

 .ރ ާއްޖގޭެ އާނ ެސްޓް ެނއ ޑްް ަނޔ ގްް ހަރ ަކާތ ްތ ެރ ިވެފ އަި ވެއވެެ

ިވ1.4ާމީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ް ސްނޯޓިއަމއްެގްެއގައ ގޮތ ުނ ް ޝޓޯް ލ ިސްޓްކުރ ެވިފ ވިއަާ ފ ަރ ާތ ަކށަް އިތ ުރ ު ކުނ ްފ ުނ ްޏއެް ނ ުވަތ ަ ކުނ ުނފް ިތ ަކކަާ ގގިުޅެނ ް ޮކެވެ  ަރޮނ ްސޯޓިއަމގްެ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް.ގޮތ ުގއަި ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ެވިދ ާނ ެއ ސްނޯޓިއަމެއގްެ ގޮތު އަިގ ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ާފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކުނ ް އެއްލ ޑީް މެމްބކ ޮކ

ި ުނހ ް ަނޔް ްކުރ ެވިފ ައ ްޔއަަ ކްނުރ ެވިދ ާނ ެ ކަމށަްއައ ޓްސެވއަރަކއާި އެއޕަރ ޓޯް އޮޕ ަރ ޭޓއަރެއްވސެް އ  ަނނ ާނވް ެކަމަށއާި އަދ ި ފ ިނއަ ޭނ ްޝަލް  ިނއް 

 .މިމާއްދ ާގއަި ބުނެ އަފވިެވެެއ

ވިއެލ ުއޭޓްކުރ މުުއަިގ ް ްލޕެ ިކޭޝަނ ްތ ައ ި ަޔބާ ކްނޮށްފ ައިވގ2.3ޮާބަކ ްނަލަޑނައަޅާފ ައވިާ ކްރ ައިޓީރ އިާޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް އ ތ ްގައ

 .ތ ިރ ީގައިމިވަނީ ވެެއ

Page 23: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 23/33

ސްނޮކޯޓިއަމގްެ ޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ކްރ ައިޓީރ އިާ ްނއެ މަަ މަދ ުވެގެން  ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ާފ ަރ ާތ ް ނ ުވަތ ަ ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއަމްއމިލ ަނއި ށަް ވުރ ެގިނ ަ ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ްނނު ށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ 3ޭއެއްމެމްބަރ ކަީ އަހަރ ކަު

ވާަހއަރ ުވަނ ެނދް ް ހިނ ްގާފ އ5ިައަހަރ ުތ ެރ 10ޭއެއޕަރ ޯޓއެް ވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަުން   .ފ ަރ ާތ ެއްކަމުގައިވ

ާ 1ފ ައިނ ޭނ ިއްޝަލ ް ކްރ ައިޓީރ ިއ

ެްނއެ މަަ ފ ައިނ ޭނ ްޝަލް  ިނއް ސެވްޓގަރ ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ް ނ ުވަތ ަ ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއަމްއ

ޑ ްސެއޮލ ަރ ށަް.މިލ ިއަން  ޔ200ޫއަހަރ ު އެވްރ ޖޭް އެނ ުއަލ ް ޓާން ވޯއަރ 5ވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަ ވުރ ެ ބޮޑުވުނ ް

ނަ 50ޫއަހަރ ު ކޮނ ްމެއަހަރ ކަުސެްވ ނ ެޓްވޯތ 3ުވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަ 2ފ ައިނ ޭނ ިއްޝަލ ް ކްރ ައިޓީރ އިާ ޔް ެސއް.މއިިލ .ޑޮލ ަރ ަށްވުރ ެ މަތ ީގައިވުނ ް

ްނއެ މަަ މުޅިކޮނ ްސޯޓިއަމގްެ ނ ެޓްވޯތ ު ނަ 100ޫކޮނ ްސޯޓއިައްމ ޔް އސެް.މިލ ިއުނ3ްޑޮލ ަރ ަށްވުރ ެ މަތ ީގއަި ވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަ  އަހަރ ުވެސްވ

ުނތޮ ް ބައިވެރ ިވާކޮނ ްސޯޓއިަގްމއަި ފ ިނއަ ޭނ ްޝަލ ް އިވްނެސްޓއަރެއގްެ ގއސެް ޑޮލ ަރ ަށްވުރ ެ މަތ ީގއަި.މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔ 50ޫފ ަރ ާތ ެއްވާނ މަަ އެފ ަރ ާތ ގުެ ނ ެޓްވޯތ ު

 އަހަރ ުވެސްނުވ3ްވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަވިއަާ ފ ޯމެޓަށވެެކިއގުެ އެނެ ސްްކ.އެފ ް.މިކަނ ްތ ަކށަް ބަލ އަި އވިެއުލޭޓްކުރ ުމށަް ބޭނު ވްާނ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ އަް ހުށަހަޅަނ ް ޖެހޭގޮތ ަށްއޮތ ީ އާރ ު .ތ ަކުގ

ެފް.މިގޮތ ުނ ް އާރ ު ކިގުއއަި ވާގޮތ ށަް ޕ ަވއަރޮފ ް އެޓާނީ އާިއ ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކގުެ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުފ ޯމަކއާި މާލ ީ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ އާި ތ ަޖުރ ިބގާެ ފ ޯމގުެ.އ

ަނޝޭ ް ފ މޯް ހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖެހެއވެެ ޖހެޭ ލ ިޔ ުނ ްތ އަް ވަރ ަށްސާފ ުކށޮްއަދ ި މިފ ޯމްތ ަކާއކެު ހުށަހަޅަނ ް.އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް އެޕ ްލ ިކ

ެވެ   .ބުނ ެދ ީފ ައިއެވ

ަނވި ީ.އެފ ް.މިއާރ ު ްލޕެ ިކޭޝަނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައ ެނގި ް ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިނއަ ް އ ެވ6ެިއކއުާ ގުޅ  :އެފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކކަީ.ފ ަރ ާތ ަކުނ ްނ ެއ

1.Reliance Airport Developers Private Limited and Aeroportos Y Servicio Auxilliares (ASA) -

“Reliance”

2.SNC-Lavalian Inc and Fulghafen Wien AG – “SNC-Lavalian”

3.GMR Infrastructure Limited and Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad(MAHB) – “GMR”

4.TAV Airports Holding Company

5.Flughafen Zurich AG. (Unique) and GVK Airport Developers Limited – “Unique”

6.Aeroport de Paris Management – “ADPM”

ްލޕެ ިކޭޝަނ ްތަ ވްއސެް މަތ ގީަ ަނޝޭ ްތ އަް އޅަުޑނަގުމެނ ް ބެލ ެލބި ުމުގއަި ހުރ ހިާ އ ވެާއމިފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކުނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ައިނ ް އެޕ ްލ ިކ އި

ެަނކާ ް ފ ާހަގަކުރ ވެެވެއ (.ކްރ ައިޓީރ ިއާއިނ ް ފ ާސްވެފ ވިައ

ް)5ެނއ ެކްސ

ިަދއ 

ެުނޔި ްތ ކަެވްއސެް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިެވެއ .ހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖހެޭ ހުރ ހިާ ލ ިޔ ެކ

ްނނު ެވެ  ްނނަ ަނވަ ީ ތ ިރ ީގައިމވިާ ބޭފ ުޅ ް ވިއެލ ުއޓޭް ކުރ ި ކޮމިޓީގއަި ހިމެޑަވިނައިގ ްލޕެ ިކޭޝަނ ްތ ައ  .މިޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ް އ

ރ ީީބ މިނ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ިނ ޭނ ްސް ޑްނެއް ޓްރ ޒެަ.އމެް.ީއ.ފ ާތ ިމަތ ު މުއޒާާ ޑކިރްޓޕ ަރ ީ.1

ޢަލ ީ ޝަރ ީފ ް ސީނ ިއއ ަރެޑްމސިިންޓްރ ޭޓވިް އޮފ ިސމ ަރިނ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ިނ ޭނ ސްް ެނއ ޑްް ޓްރ ެޒަރ ީ.2

ިނއެ ް ފ ަޒީލ ް ޑިޕ ާޓްމަނ ޓްް އޮފ ް ސިވިލ ް އއިޭވޭޝަނ ް.3 ޙުސ

ަރެނ ެރ ަލ ް މިނ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ިނ ޭނ ްސް ެނއ ޑްް ޓްރ ެޒަރ ީ.4 ޙުސެއިނ ް ފ ަޒީލ ގްެ ބަދ ަލު އަިގ ފ ަހުނ ް( ސމާީ ޢަޤީލ ް ޑައިރ ެކްޓޖ

)އިވެރި ވެވަޑައިގަތ ްަބ

Page 24: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 24/33

ީ ަދއ ި މސިް ނ ެ ީސ ެގ.އެފ ް.ައއިއަދ ި މގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ާހ މެހެރ ާ އަދ ި ގޑިް ލ ޮޔެ ގްެޓ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް މިސްޓަރ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް މސިް ރ ަމޓަު މަގާގ

ި ުނބ ެފ ައިއެވވެެ ކެނސްް. (ޖޯނ ް ީޑ ކްރ ޮތ ސރާް އޮބްސާވަރު ގްެނ ގޮތ ުގއަި ބައިވެރ ިވެފ ވިއަާ ކަމށަް އިވެލ ުއޭޝަނ ް ރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައ އިވެލ ުއޭނަްޝ6ެއ

 )ރ ިޕ ޓޯް

ަނޝޭ ް ރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައވިާ ގޮތ ުނ ް އެޕ ކިްލޭޝަނ ް ހުށަހެޅުމގުެ އެނ ްމެފ ހަު ތ ާރ ީޚކަީ 17 ނ ަމަވެސް ުނސ ްގޑ18:00ިަެގ2010ޖެނ ުއަރ 15ީއިވެލ ުއ

ެވ12:00ެެގ2010ޖެނ ުއަރ ީ ިން-ގއަި ީއ2010ޖެނ ުއަރ 13ީމިކަނ ް ޝޯޓްލ ިސޓްް ކުރ ެވުނ ު ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކށަް.އށަް އިތ ުރ ު ކުރ ެވިފ ައިވެއ މެއިލ ްއ

 .މަގގާީ އަނ ްގާފ ައިވާކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ވިއަެވެެއމސިް ރ ަމޓަު

 މަރ ުޙަލ ާ)ޕ ީ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު(ރ ިކުއެސޓްް ފ ޯ ޕ ްރ ޮޕ ޯސަލ ް

ެވ2010ާމޗާރ 18ްރ ިކުއެސޓްް ފ ޯ ޕ ްރ ޮޕ ސޯައްލއާި ޕ ްރ ޮޖެކްޓގްެ މަޢްލ ޫމާތ ު ހިމެނޭ  ްފިނއ މޯރޭޝަނ ް މެމޮރ ެނ ްޑމަް ގއަި މަތީ އަގިއ

ެއ6ެިވޕ ްރ ިކޮލ ިފ އަި ކެނސްް(.ެވފ ަރ ާތ އަް ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ައިވ އެއޕަރ ޓ1.2ްޯެގޕ ީ.އެފ ް.އާރ ުިމ)ޕ ީ.އެފ ް.އާރ 7ުެއ ގއަި މާލޭ  ިނއ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލް 

ަނޝެ ް އެގްރ ީމަނ ޓްްއެއގްެ ދ ަށުނ ްކަމށަް)ތ ަނ ިނހް ގްާ ތ ަރ ައްޤީކށޮް މަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ުނ ްވަކިމުއްދ ަތ ަކށަް ކއުްއަޔްދ ީގެނ ް(ޕ ްރ ައިވެޓައިޒްކުރ ާނީ  ޮނކ ްސ

ެވެ   .ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ

ޮނ3.1ްެގޕ ީ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ެވ3ެ ަނނ ްޖެހޭނ ީގައި ގާވޮތ ުނ ް ބިއްޑ ކަޔަށެއ ެވެ.ަބ ޭނނި ްޝަލ ް ޑިބެއ ކިްނަލ ްބިއާިޑ ފ ައ ޓ ިާއެކ ލީ އެ ީގަލ ް ބިޑ މިބިޑްތ ައް.އ

ދ ެނ ްލ ް ބިޑްއިނ ް ފ ާސވްާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ އަްމިގޮތ ުނ ް ލ ގީަ.މާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވާނ ީ ލ ީގަލ ް ބިޑަށވެެއިވެލ ުއޭޓްކުރ މުުއަިގ ފ ުރ ަތ ަމަބަލ ާނ ެ ކަމށަް މަޢުލ ޫ

ިނއް ް ފ ާސްވާނ މަަވެެއ.ޓެކްނ ަލކި ް ބިޑަށވެެއިވެލ ުއޓޭް ކުރ ާނ ީ ކިްނަލ ް ބިޑ ާނލަ ީ ޓެކ ޭނނި ްޝަލ ް ބޑިް ބ ކިްނަލ ް ބޑިް އވިެއުލޓޭް.ފ ައ މިގޮތ ުނ ް ޓެކ

ާނލަ ީ އާރ ް ގައވިާ ޑްރ ާފ ޓްް ކޮޝެސްނަނ ް އެގްރ ީމަނ ޓްްއަގވިާ ިނމ ިމމަް ޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ރި އުކމަރެނ ްޓސްްއާިއ2ލ ްީގެޕ ޝެޑއިު.އެފ ް.ކުރ ުމުގއަި ބ

ެވ3.3.2ެއޭގައވިާ ސްޓެނ ޑްާޑްރ ތ ަކަކށަް ކަމށަް)އާރ ު.ީޓ.އމެް( ަލްމިޑްރ ާފ ޓްް ކޮނ ްސެޝަނ ް އެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓކަީ. (ގއަި ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ ލ ީގ

ަލއި ްކޮށްފ އަި ެވެހުށަހަޅަނ ޖްެބިޑްތ ެރ ޭގއަި އިނ ީޝ ެނމު ްޓެކ  .)ޭހ ޑޮކިއ

ް ވިއެލ ުއޓޭް ކުރ ާނ ެ ގޮތ ްކަމށަް ަނިވއަ ީ ސަރ ުކާރ ަށްލ ބިޭ ހުރ ހިާ ކޮނ ްސެޝަނ ްފީ އެްއ އަހަރ ަކށ5.5.3ްަފ ައިނ ޭނ ްޝަލ ް ބިޑ އިނ ް%10ައިގ ބުނ ެފ 

ެނގި ްނ ެވެ  އަލ ްނނަ ަ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ޓްް ވއިެލުއށަް ަބ ުނއަ ޓްް ކޮށގްެއްނ ެއް.ޑިސްކ ަނޝެ ް ފ ީއ މިގޮތ ުނ ް ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ޓްް ވެލ ިއު ެނއ ްމެބޮޑު ޮނކ ްސ

ެވެ   .ހުށަހޅަާ ފ ަރ ާތ ަކށަް ބޑިް ކާމިޔ ބާު ވާނ ެކަމަށ

ވިއަާ އިތ ުރ ު ޝަރ ުޠ ުތ ަކށަް ބަލ ާއިރ ު.އެފ ް.މީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ް އާރ ު ޓަށްކުރ ާ މޅުިބިކްޑާމިބާޔުކުރ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް އެއޕަރ ޯގޮތ ުނ ްގއަި ާވ6.2.2ޕ ީގ

ގުެގއިން ސެވްޓްމަނ ޓްް ެވެ.އެފ ް.އއަި%1ައ ގެއްރ ީމަނ ްޓްގއަި ސޮއިކުރ ާވަގުތ ު ދަ ކްއަނ ޖްެއެހ އަދ ިހަމައއެާ އެއްވަރ ގުެ ޢަދ ަދ ެއް. ސީއށަް

ަނޝެ ްފ ިނއީ ް ެކޑނޭގޮތ ށަް ދ ިވހެި ސަރ ުކާރ ަށްވސެް ދ ައްކަނ ްޖހެެވެެއ ަލއި ް ކޮނ ްސ ޭނހެ ެކަމށަް.އިނ ީޝ ެގއްރ ީމަނ ްޓްގއަި ސކިޮއުރ ަނ ްޖ

ެބުނ ެފ ވިައަނ ީ އެޑޯްވ ކުރ ާދ ުވަހުނ ް ފ 

ް15 ށިގެނ 

ެ .ދ ުވަސްތ ެރ ގޭަވެއ

ސްނޯޓިއަމްގައި ިހބުނެ އަިފގއ3.2.5ިަ އަށްވުރ ެ%5ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއަމގްެމެނ ޭ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިނ ްގާނ ެފ ަރ ާތ ށަްވާގޮތ ުން  ޮނކ ްސޯޓއިައެމްނ މަަ ޮކ

ާނވެް ވެެއބޮޑުޙިސްާއއެްއ ެފް.އާރ ު.އޮނ ަނން  ެނގި ް ބޑިްށުހަހަޅަނ ް ބޭނު ވްާނ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކށަް ބޭނ ުނ ވްާ.އ އިތ ުރ ުމަޢުލ ޫމާތ އާިޕ އީާ ގުޅ

ހިެ  ުނތޮ ް ފ ޮނ ވުާ ިޔލ ުމއެް ދ ިވ  ސަރ ުކާރ ުގެދ ިރ ާސާކުރ ުމަށްޓަކއަި ޑޓާާ މޫރގްެ ޚިދ ުމަތ ް ފ ޯރ ުކށޮް ދ ެވޭނ ެކަމަށއާި ސާފ ުކުރ ަން  ޭނބު ވްާނ ކަމަކާގުޅޭގ

ެވެ.އެފ ް. ީއސަށްވސެް ފ ޮނ ަނވްު  ާނވ ެކަމށަް އާރ ު.އެފ ް.އިތ ުރ ުނ ް އއަި ެފނު ައިވެއ  .ޕ ީގއަި ބ

Page 25: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 25/33

ހަށަޅަނ ްޖހެޭ ިޔލ ުނ ްތ އަް ވަރ ށަް ތ ަފ ްސީލ ްކށޮް އާރ ުކޮނ މްެ ބިއެްޑއަިގ އަބިތ ަކއާި ބޑިާކެުއ ުހ ެނނެ ްޖހެޭ ެފް.ވސެް ހިމ ޕީ އަިގ.އ

ާނޔަ ްކޮށްދ ީފ ައވިެވެެއ ެވެމިގޮތ ުނ ް ލ ަލގީ ްބިގްޑއަި ތ ި.ބ ާނވި ްޖެހެއ  .ރ ީގައިމވިާ މވިާއަބިތ އަް ހިމަނ ާފ ައ

ްޯއެއްގޮތ ށ1ްަފ މ4ްޯޝެޑިއުލ ް-:ބިޑްފ މ ގައވިާ ނ ަމޫނ ާ ާއ

ީިއެއްގޮތ ށ2ްަފ މ4ްޯޝެޑިއުލ ް-:ބިޑްސއިެކުރ ޓ ގައވިާ ނ ަމޫނ ާ ާއ

ްަގައވިާ ނ ަމޫނާ  އާއެއްގޮތ ށ3ްަފ މ4ްޯޝެޑިއުލ ް-:ކޮނ ްފ މޯރެޝަނ ް އޮފ ް ސްޓޭޓސ

 ހުށަހަޅާފ ަރ ާތ ގުެ ކޯޕ ަރ ޓޭް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ އ ަރޮނ ަނ ޮތގް ގުެ ބަޔާ އެްނ-:ކޯޕ ަރ ޓޭް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ަރ

ީ އެއްގޮތ ށަްގއ4ިަފ މ4ްޯޝެޑިއުލ ް-:ޕ ަވއ ަރޮފ ް އެޓނާރ ާވ ނ ަމޫނ ާ ާއ

ނާ ިވައ ަމޫނ ާ އއާެގްއޮތ ށ5ްަފ މ4ްޯޝެޑިއުލ ް-: ނ ްފ ްލ ިކޓްް އޮފ ް އިނ ްޓްރ ެސޓްާ ބހޭެ ަޔބ ާންޮކ ގ

ްަލއި ް ކޮށްފ ައވިާ ޑްރ ާފ ޓްް ކޮނ ްސެޝަނ ް އެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓ ގައވިާ ގޮތ ށ2ްަޝެޑިއުލ ް.އިނ ީޝ

އަބިތ އަް ބިކާނޮށްފ ައިވާނ ީ ޑްރ ާ ެނނެ ްޖހެޭ ެމްޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ބިގްޑއަި ހިމ ްޗއަ ައް.ީޓ.ފ ޓްް އެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓްގައވިާ އ އާރ ުގއަި ހިމެނޭ  ަނކ ްތ ަކގުެ މ

ެވެ  ެނނެ ްޖހެޭ އަބިތ ަކކަީ.ބިނ ާކޮށްފ ައ  :މިގޮތ ުނ ް ހިމ

ް ފ ކިްގުމުއްދ ަތ ގުެ ވިޝަނ ް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކުރ ުމށަް ފ ައސިާ ހޯދ ާނ ެގޮތ ް ލ ަފ ާކުރ ާ ޓްރ ެދ ި-: ސްޓްރ ެޓެޖކިް ތ ަރ ައްޤގީެ ޕ ްލ ޭނ

 ސްޓްރ ެޓޖެީ ލ ަފ ާކުރ ާ އާމްދ ަނ ީއއާި ޚަރ ަދ ު އޮޕ ްރ ޭޝަނ ް ކުރ ިއށަް ގެނ ްދާ ގެނޮތ ްތ އަްވިޔ ަފ ާރ ި ފ ުޅާކުރ ާނ ެ ގޮތ ގުެ

ްާަނޝް ް ޕ ްރ ޮގްރ މ  ސިވިލ ްއއިޭވޭޝަނ ް ޤަވާޢިދ ގުެ ދ ަށުނ ް ފ ުރ ިހަމަކުރ ަނ ްޖެހޭކަނ ްތ ައްތަ ޓ ްއމާރިނ ަލ ް-:ކޮނ ްސްޓްރ ަކ

ަނމް ޓްް ިނބ ްހިކްއުނ ް ސަޕ ޓޯް ޚިދ ުމައްތ އަް ެލވި ޮޕ ްމެނ ްޓްބިލ ްޑިއ ގްނެއފަރ ިލ ޑްް ޕ ޭވ ލ ޭނ ްޑްސައޑިް ޑ

ްަެނއ ްވމަރެނ ްޓަލް  ްލޕ ޭނ އ ިާއޮޕ ަރ ޭޝަނ ަލް  ްލޕ ޭނ ް-:ހިނ ްގުމގުެ މގިއަަޑުނ ޕ ޭނލް ްތ އ ި   ސޭފ ޓްީ ޕ ްލ ޭނ ާއ

ަނޅަ ްޖެހެނ ީ ޝއިެޑުލ ް ެވ6ެެގ ފ މރ4ްޯފ ައިނ ޭނ ޝްަބ ްލޑިް ހުށަހ ީގޕައވިާ މިފ މޯރއާި ޕ ްރޮ ސޯޕަލް އަިގ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު.ައގވިާ މަނޫނ ާއއާި އެއްގޮތ ަށ

ވަނ ީ ލ ިބޭޖުމްލ ަ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް.ގައވިާ ފ ޯމުގއަި ތ ެލ ގުެ ކޮން ޝެސަނ ް ފ ީއއެް ނ ަގާގޮތ ަކށަް ނ ެތ ެއވެެީޕ.އެފ ް.އާރ ި.ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ފ މޯާ ތ ަފ ާތ ެއވެެް ޑިބްކުރ ާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކށަް ނ ޯޓިފ އަި ކުރ ެވުނ ު ލ ުނޔި ް.ޕ ަސެން އެްޓ ސަރ ުކާރ ަށްދ ައްކާގޮތ ަށވެެ ަނމް ްޓ ީމެ/މިފ ޯމށަް ގެނ އަި އެމެނ ްޑ  ީސ.އެފ ް.އިލް  އަިއއ

ެވެ.އިނ ް އަދ ަނވި ީ ލ ބިޭ ގޮތ ް ނ ުވެފަ ވެެއ  .މިފ މޯރްގައވިާ ގޮތ ުނ ް ތ ިރ ީގއަި މިގާވޮތ ށަް ކޮނ ްސެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ޢަދ ަދ ުތ އަް ހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖެހެއ

ީ ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ަނކް ްޖހެޭ އިނ ިއީޝަލ ް ޮކ ެގ ޢަދ ަދ ުޙަވާލ ވުުގުެމ ކުރ ިނ ް ދ ައ

ަްކ ަނޝެ ްފ ގީެ ގޮތ ުގއަި ދ ައ )ފ މޯރްގއަި ބުނ ެފ ައވިާ ޢަދ ަދ އެް(މއިިލަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ ަރ 1.5 ނ ްޖހެޭކޮނ ްމެއަހަރ ަކު ޮނކ ްސ

ް ނ2014ެާޙަވާލ ވުާ ތ ާރ ުނޚީ ްފ ެށިގެނ ަނދް ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކ ގިައެން  ޫނނ ްގޮތ ްގޮތ ށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމ އިވްކ ެގ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ

 ޕ ަސެނ ްޓޖޭް

ނާެއިނ ް ފ ެށިގެނ ް ކޮނ ްޓްރ 2015ެ ެނގްި  ޫނނ ްގޮތ ްގޮތ ށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ އީަނިނ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކ ކްޓގްެ މުއްދ ަތ ގުެ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ ވިކްއައ ޕ ަސެނ ްޓޖޭް

ް ިެނގ ްދމާ ަނ ީއިނ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކާނ ެ ޕ ެނސަ ްޓޖ2014ްޭޙަވާލ ވުާ ތ ާރ ީޚުނ ްފ ެށ ެނގި ް ލ ބިޭ އ  ެގ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ ވއިްއަކ

2015ްުލް ެނިގ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކާނ ެ ޕ ެނސަ ްޓޖޭްއިނ ް ފ ެށިގެން  ޮނކ ްޓްރ ޭކްޓގްެ މއ  ދ ަތ ގުެ ނ ިޔ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ ވިކްއައ

ެވ17:00ެެގ2010ޖޫނ 13ްޕ ީ އއާެވުާކ ބިޑްޑޓާާ ޝީޓްގައވިާ ގޮތ ުނ ް ބިޑްހުށަހެޅމުުއ ެގެނ ްމެފ ަހުތ ާރ ީޚކަީ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ދަި.ިނމ ިޓެއ އ

ެނހެ ީ އާކކެު އޮރ ިނޖި ަލް އާިއެގ ބިޑްސެކިއުރ ޓިީ-/USD750,000ބިޑްހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖ ެވެޮކ3ައ  .ޕ ީއ

Page 26: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 26/33

ކެނސްް(ޕ އީާކެުއ ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ައވިާ އިނ ްފ ޯމޭޝަނ ް މެމޮރ ެނ ްޑަމްގއަި.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ޕރ ޯޓގްެ ހިނ ްގުމއާި މިހާރ ގުެ ޙާލ ަތ އާި މާލ ީއއެަ)8ެއ

ގއ2007ިަމއެިމިގޮތ ުނ ް ދ ީފ ައވިާ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ ަކަށްބަލ ާއިރ ު .ފ ުރ ިހަމައށަް ހިމަނ ާފ ައިވެއވެެމަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ ަކއާި ޤާނ ޫނ ީ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ އަް ވަރ ށަް

ލާުޑައިނ ާ ަނމް ޓްްބ ެގާރ ުދ ަނ ެގަތ ުމގުެ ދ ިރ ާސާތ ަކއެް ކޮށްފ ައިވާކަމަށއާިޓެސޓްް ކިޔ ާ ކުނ ުނފް ްޏކަާ ޙަވ މިދ ިރ ާސާއިނ ްކޮށްގެނ ް ރ ަނ ވްޭ ޕ ޭވ

އަި ސަރ ަޙައްދ ެއްގއަިމީޓަރ ުދ ގ845ުިދ ައްކާގޮތ ުނ ް ަނޝޭ ް އގޮައަނިޒޭޝަނ ްއިޓްނނަރ ޭ(އޯ.އޭ. ީސ.އ މަތ ީ ސަލ ާ)ޝަނ ަލ ް ސިވިލ ް އޭވިއ

އ10ިައަހަރ ުކަމަށއާި ނ ަމަވސެް އަދ 20ިމިނ ްގަޑުތ ަކަށްވުރ ެ ބާރ ުދ ެރ ަކަމަށއާި އަދ ި މިހާރ ު އޮތ ްރ ަނ ްވގޭެ އުމުރ ކަީ އަހަރ ުފ ަހުނ ް މުޅިރ ަނ ްވޭގެވެ  އަިމިޕ ްރ ޮޖެކްޓްގއަި(އަދ ި ހަމަމއިާކެުއ ހަލ ްކްރ ޯ.އެއްކށޮް ތ ާރ ުއަޅަނ ްޖހެޭއެނ އ2009ިައިނ ް) ސީގެ ޮނކ ަލސް ްޓެނ ޓްްއެްއ.އެފ ް.އ  ނ ވޮެބްމަރ ުގ

އެްއ ާނކ ުތ ަ ުނތޮ ް ބބިެލެލ ުނމު ް ރ ަނ ވްޭކ ެގާނ ުތ ައްވަރ ަށްބޮޑށަް ހަލާ ވުކެފ ައވިާ ކަމަށއާި ަބ ކ ާވަމަށއާި މިގ ުގެއޭޕ ްރ ަނ ގްެ ޙާލ ަތ ުބަލާ އަިފ ކ

ި ުނހ ަނން ްޖހެޭ ބާރ ުމިނ ް ނ ެތ ްކަމަށއާި މިކަމަކީ ކާޕްކށޮް ޮނއި ްނ ަ މަތ ިނ ްދ ާބޯޓށަް ވަރ ަށްނ ުރ ައްކާތ ެރ ިމަތ ގިަޑނުގައ  .މަށވެެކަމެއކްަފ ައ

ެނޕް ިނއީ ް އެއަރ ޯޑމޯް ސެޓްފ ިކޓެް ހޯދ ުމށަް މޯލ ްޑިވސްް ސިވިލ ް އޭވިއޭޝަނ ް ޑިޕ ޓ2009ްާޖުލ އަި ަށްގއަި އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ކޮމ  ނ ްޓ

ޙާލްކުރ ަނ ްޖހެޭ ނ ް އެއަރ ޯޑމޯް އޮޑިޓެއްކޯށްފ ައވިާ ކަމަށއާި އެއޮޑިޓުނ ް ިއހުށަހެޅުމާގުޅުގެނ ް އެތ ަނު  އެްމ ފ ާހަގަކޮށްފ ައވިާ ކަމަށއ53ިާ ްސ ަކ

ަންނޮނ ްޖހެޭ ސަލ ާމަތ ީ ސަރ ަޙައްދ ު ކޭވްނޮޅުގއަި އ ި ުނހ ަނން ްޖހެޭ ފ ުޅާމިނ ްނ ެތ ުމއާި ރަ  ެސް.ީއ.އާރ ު(މިކަނ ްތ ަކގުެ ތ ެރ ޭގއަި ރ ަނ ްވޭގައ ައގި)ޭއ.އ

ިނމު ްނ ެތ ަނކް ް ފ ާހަގަކޮށްފ ައވިެވެެއ  .ހުނ ަނން ްޖހެޭ ބޮޑ

އަކަމީޓަރ ުކަމަށއާި މއިީ އައޓ12470ާާބޮޑުމިނ ކަީ)ިނއ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލ ް އަދ ި ޑމޮެޓްސކިް އެއްކށޮް(ޓާމިނ ަލ ް ބިލ ްޑިނ ގްެއަދ ި މިހާރ ުހުރ ި

 ސާވސިް ލ ެވެލ ް ސގީެ މިން ޑނަގށަް ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ވެޭ ވަރ ަށްވުރ ެ ޖާގަދ ަތ ި ވަރ ެއްކަމަށއާި އަދ ި މިހާރ ުހުރ ި ޓާމިނ ަލ ް އއާި އޭޕ ްރ ަނ ް)ޓއީޭ.އޭ.އއަި(

އާިއިރ ުމަތ ީއަދ ި ޓެކްސވީޭ ބޮޑުކުރެ ވޭވަރ ށަް ރ ަނ ްވގޭެ ހުޅގަނުފ ަރ ާތ ުގއަި ތ ަނ ެތން ުމުނ ް އާޓާމިނ ަލ އެް ރަ ވްނގޭެ ފ ަރ ާތ ުގއަި އޭޕ ްރ ަނ ްއ

ެވެ.އކެު އިމާރ ާތ ްކުރ ަނ ް ޖެހޭކަމަށްވސެް ިމ އއަިޓެކްސވީޭއާިއ  .އމެް ގައިއެވ

އިރީ އަިގމގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ދ ީފ ައވިާ އިތ ުރ ު މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ ަކށަް ބަލ ާއިރ ު މިހާރ ުހުރ ި ފ ިއުލ ް ފ މރާް އކަީ ސަލ ާމަތ ީ މިގްނަޑުތ ަކަށްވުރ ެ ރ ަނ ވްޭއާިއ ަކ

ަލނި ެއްލ ްއކަީ ށއާި މިހާރ ުހުރ ި ކގާޯ ޓާމިނ ަާވ ތ ަނ ެއްކމަަ ާވބެވަރ ށަް ބޮޑަށްހަލ ާކުވެފ ައވިާ ތ ަނެ ކްއަމުނ ް އެތ ަނ ް ތ ަޅާލ އަި އާޓާމ

އާި އުގސިއަް އާޓާމިނަ ގާލުޅުވއަި އިތ ުރ ު މަގުތ ަށްވސެް ހަދ ަނ ްޖެހޭކަމަށއާިއަޅަނ ްޖެހޭކަމަށ ވްސގޭެ ަމ ހުޅުމާލ ޭއއާި ދ ެމެދ ު އަޅާފ ވިއަާ ޯކ

ެނޕްީ ނިްއލ ްއިނ ް ނ ަޖސިް މޫދ ށަް ބޭރ ުކުރ ަނ ީ ޓްރ ޓީްކުނށޮް ކމަަމިހާރ ުހުރ ި ޓާމިނ ަ ާނޓް ީ އެއޕަރޯ ސްްޓ ކޮމ  ށއާި އެއޓަރްރ ެފ ކިް ކޮނ ްޓްރ ޯލް  ަލބ ަހައ

ަލނި ގްެ ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ޭނ ްފ ެށމުުހ ްނުޅުމާލ ޭ ފ ަޅުގއަި.ކަމށަް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެ އުޅދަނ ުފ ަހަރ ށަް) ސީޕ ްލ ޭނ ް ޓާމިނަ ކްލާރ ީގއަި(އަދ ި އާޓާމ

 .ކުރ ެވޭގޮތ ށަް ޖެޓީހަދ ަނ ް ޖެހޭކަމަށްވސެް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވވެެކާރ ި

ކިްނަލ ް ރ ިކުއމަރެނ ް ަނކާ ްތ ައްތ އަް ރ ގަނަޅުކށޮް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ތ ަރ ައްޤީކުރ ުމަށްޓަކއަި ކުރ ަނ ްޖހެޭ ކަނ ްތ ައްތ އަް މިނ ިމމަް ޓެކ ްސްމަތ ީގއަި އެވ ޓ

ަނމި ާފ ައވިެވެެއ)އާރ ު.ީޓ.އމެް( ަނމި ާ.ގއަި ހ ެވެފ ައވިާ މއަިމިގޮތ ުނ ް ހ  .ޑނަުގ ަނކ ްތ ައްތ އަް ތ ިރ ީގއަި މިވަނ ީއ

ަލކަ ްސގްެ ގޮތު އަިގ ކުރ ެހުމުގއަި ފ ާހަގަކށޮްއަފވިާ  ޢިމާރ ާތ ްތ އަް ނ ައްތ ާލ ުނ ްރ ަނ ްވގޭެ ހުޅގަނުގައި ބޮއްސްޓް އ45000ިާ-:އިރ ުމަތ ީފ ަރ ާތ ށަް ޓާމިނ ަލ ް ބަދ ަލ ުކުރ ުނ ޭނޓް ްޑއާި ކޑ11ްޯއަކަމީޓަރ ުހުރ ި ޓާމިނ ަލ ަކށަް ވުމ ީގެކޑޯް ީސ ސ އ

އަހަރ ގުެ މުއްދ ަތ ަކށ50ްަ.އެއބަރްރ ޖިް ހުރ ުނ ްގއަިކޑޯް ސގީެ ސްޓޭނ ޑ1ްްކޑޯް ީއ އަދ 4ިމިގޮތ ުނ ް. ސްޓޭނ ޑްް ހުރ ުނ 6ް

ުނނޭ ްކުރ ވެޭ ިނުވްބ  .އިމާރ ާތ އެް ކަމުގައ

ިައަި.އކަަ މީޓަރ ު ހުނ ްނ ަ ީވ42000ތ ަޅުމގުެ އޭރ ިއާގއ އަި. ީސ/ޕ ީ.އ ޕާމިނ ަލ އެް ޢިމާރ ާތ ްކުރ ުނ ް.އ ކޑޯް ީއ1ކޑޯް ީސ1.ޓީ

  ސްޓޭނ ޑްް ހުރ ުން 

ް ެުނޅ ާނރު ެ ފ ައިބއ ަރޮޕ ްޓކިް ނ ޓެްކޯވއެް އ ި ޭނބ ުނ ްކ  .އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ގައ

Page 27: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 27/33

ިައ ަން-:ީޓ ސިސްޓމަް. ީސ.އެއޕަރ ޯޓގްެ އ ކެޗިނއް ް ސިސްޓމަް އިނ ްފ ޯމޭޝ ގެބޖޭް ސިސްޓމަް ިސސްޓމަް އިނ ްފ ޯމޭޝަނ ް

 ކިއޯސކްް ހުނުރް 

ްެއެފ ް ޢިމާރ ާތ ް ބަދ ަލ ުކުރ ުނ ް.ީޑ.ެނއ ް.އމ. 

އ ިާއިކއާޯ މިގްަނޑނުތ ަކށަް ފ ެތ ުނ ް އޭޕ ްރ ަނ ގްެ ކާނ ުތ އަް ސަލ ާމަތ 25ީ-:ޕ ްރ ަނ ްޭއ އަހަރ ގުެ މުއްދ ަތ ށަް ބޭނ ުނ ްކުރ ެވުމ

ުނނޭ ވްާ ކަރ ަން އާިޓ މުވާސަލ ާތ ީ އިނ ްފ ްރ ާ ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ހ ަރުރ ުނ ްމިނ ގްަޑނުތ ކަާ އެއްގޮތ ށަް ބަދ ަލ ުކުރ ުން   .ބ

ް ރ ަނ ްވގޭެ ކޮޅށަް ނ ުގސޮް ވަކިހިބާސުނކަ ް ޓެކްސވީޭ އށަް އެރ ޭގޮތ ށަް ހުރ ުނ ް-:ާއ އޭޕ ްރ ަނ ްއށަް ވަދ ެވޭގޮތ ށަް ޓެކްސވީޭ އެޅުނ

 .ުނޭނބ ވްާ ކަރަ ޓްނއާި މުވާސަލ ާތ ީ އިނ ްފ ްރ ާ ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ހ ަރުރ ުނ ް.އަހަރ ގުެ މުއްދ ަތ ަކށަް ބޭނު ކްނުރ ވެޭ ފ ެނ ްވަރ ު ހުރ ުނ 20ް

ް ާޓ2015ް ސަރ ަޙައްދ ުަކއަ މީޓަރ ގ7600ެުޑައިނ ާޓެސޓްް ރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައވިާ-:ރ ަނ ވްޭ މަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ުނ ިނރު ް ކަމާގޅުޭ ސްޓެނ ްޑ އގިެ ކ

ުނނޭ ްކުރ ވެޭ ފ ެނ ްވަރ އެްއަިގ ހުރ ުނ ް ފ ެނ ްދ މެޭ ކާނ ުތ އ20ްަމަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ވެޭ ބއަި.ތ ަކާއެއްގޮތ ށަް މަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ުނ ް އަހަރ ުވަނ ްދ ެނ ް ބ

ުނ50ް ސްޓެނ ްޑޑާް ތ ަކއާެގްއޮތ ށަް މަރ ާމާތ ުކށޮް  .އަހަރ ު ބޭނު ކްނުރ ވެޭ ގޮތ ްވ

ް ުނޅޮ ްލ ާފ ަ ދ ެވޭގޮތ ށަް މަގުހެދ ުން-:މަގުތ ައްހެދ ުނ ލ ަފ ާކުރ ވެޭމިގޮތ ުނ ްއިރ ުމަތ ީ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ހުޅގނަު ފ ަރ ާތ އަް ރ ަނ ްވޭކ

ުނނޭ ްކުރ ވެޭ ފ ެނ ްވަރ ަކށަް ހެދ ުނ20ްއަކަމީޓާރ ގުެ މގ21000ުަ  .އަހަރ ށަް ބ

ް ްުނކ  ބިނ އިްހ

ް ެުނޅ  ާއ ގްރ ައުނ ޑްް ހޭނ ްލޑިް ބ ގްޭނއްސއެް އ

ްަނދު އެް ހެދ ުނ  .މަތ ިނ ްދ ާ ބޯޓށަް ބޭނ ުނ ްވާ ްޕސ ެއރ ަރ ައްކާކުރ ާނ ެ ގ

ްމިހާރ ުހުރ ި ފ ިއުލ ްފ މާް އެހެނ ް ސަރ ަޙައްދ ަކށަް ބަދ ަލ ުކުރ ުނ. 

ް މިހާރ ުހުރ ި ފ ަޔ ސަރްޓޭޝަނ ް ތ ަޅާލ އަި އެހެނ ްތ ަނ ަކށަް ބަދ ަލ ުކށޮް ތ ަނ ާގޅުޭ މަގުތ އަް ހެދ ުނ 

ް ފ ަޅުތ ެރ ޭ ބދަނ ަރ ެއްހަދ އަި ފ ާލ ަނ ްތ އަް އެޅުނ. 

ާ ފެ ސްންޖހަާ ސެކިއުރ ޓިީ ނ ިޒާމއެް ޤާއިމުކުރ ުނ ްއެއޕަރ ޓޯް ވަށައިގެނ ްމަތ ީ މިނ ގްަޑނުތ ކަާ އެއްގޮތ ށަް ސަލ 

ަލނި ްއަޤްވމާީ މިން ޑނަގުތ ަކއާި ަންނުންހ ްޖހެޭ ބައ ަނކެ ްތ ައ ރ ާއްޖގޭެ ޤަވާޢިދ ުތ ކަާމީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ްވސެް ފ ުރ ިހަމަކުރ ަނ ްޖހެޭ އހެެކްނަނ ްތ ަކއާި އ

ެވެ  ްނނު ަނ18ްއަދ ި މީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ް ޑްރ ާފ ޓްް އެގްރ ީމަނ ްޓގްެ އެނ ެކސްް.ބެހޭތ ަފ ްސީލ ް ހިމަނ ާފ ައިއެވ ައިގ އެއޕަރ ޯޓްއިނ ް ދ ޭޚިދ ުމަތ ގުެ ފ ެނ ްވަރ ު ހ

ިވާ.އެފ ް.އިނ ްފ ޯމޭޝަނ ް މެމޮރ ަނ ްޑމަްއަިގ އއަި.މިން ޑނަގުތ ަކއާި ކީޕ ާފ މޯެސްްނ އިން ކޮޑޭޓސާރްތ އަް ހިމަނ ާފ ައވިެވެެއޖެހޭނ ެ  ީސ އިނ ް ލ ަފ ާކޮށްފ ައ

ެވ366.5ެއާރު އަގވިާ ކަނ ްތ އަް ފ ުރ ިހަމަކުރ ުމަށްޓަކއަި.ީޓ.ގޮތ ުނ ް އމެް ޮލޑް ޚ ަރަރ ަދ ުކުރ ަނ ްޖެހޭއ  ނ ިމެނ ްވާއިރ ށ2014ްައަދ ި.ިލމ ަނއި ް ޔ ޫއެސ

ަލނި ްއަޤްވމާީ އަދ ި ރ ާއްޖގޭެ ޤަވާޢިދ ުތ ަކށަް ފ ެއްތ ުމަށްޓަކއަި ެވ287ެބައ ުނނޭ ާނވް ެއ .މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ ބ ަރ

އަިއެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނ ީއއާި ޓްރ ެފ ި މިގޮތ ުނ ް އެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އާމްދ ަނ ީ ލ ިބެނ ީ މައގިަޑުނ.އމެްއަިގ ހިމަނ ާފ ައވިެވެެއ.ކގްެ ތ ަފ ްސީލ ުވސެް އ

ެވެ  ގ ިާއުޅުމެއްނ ެތ ް އާމްދ ަނ ީއ ެނނެ ީ.ދ ެގޮތ ަކށަް ކަމަށއާި އއެީ ޓްރ ެފ ިކްއިނ ް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ އީަނއާި ޓްރ ެފ ިކްއ ޓްރ ެފ ިކްރ ެވެނ ިއގުެ ތ ެރ ޭގއަި ހިމ

ެވެލ ޭނ ްޑިނ ް ފީ އާިއ ޕ ިނކާ ްފ ީ ގ ިާއްރ ުނއަ ޑްް ހޭނ ްލޑް ިނ ް ފ ީއ ަނޝޭ ްފ ީއ ަނދް ީގެރ ެވެނ ިޓްރ ެފ ކިް.އއާި ނ ެވިގ ކަީއ އެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމ ުއ

އާި.އަށްވުރ ެވސެް މަދ ުޢަދ ަދ ެކެއވ20%ެެ ަރާވސިް ޗާ އާިޖ ތ ެލ ގުެ އާމްދ ަނ ީއ  ޮނނ ް ޓްރ ެފ ކިް ރ ެވެނ ިއގުެ ތ ެރ ޭގއަި ހިމެނ ެނ ީ ޕ ެނސަ ްޖސ

ުނތޮ ް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނީ ވެެއ ހެއެނ ެނހި ް ގޮތ ްގ އުްކއާިޔ އަި.ތ ަނ ްތ ަނ ުނ ބިލްޭ ބިލ ަނއި ް ރ ުފ ިޔ2.4ާ ނ ިމޭއިރ 2008ުިގމޮތ ުނ ް އާމްދ ގީނަެ ގޮތ ުގ

ެނގި ް ލ ބިޭ އާމަދަ މަކީނށަް މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ު ދ ީފ ައިވެއވެެއކަީ ތ ެ%80ލ ބިޭކޭނަމަށއާި މީގެތ ެރ ެއިނ ް  .ޔ ޮވއިްއަކ

ެވެ ެޔހު ޮކަމަށްވސެް ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ ަލބާ ާއިރ ު ބޑޮުމަކަށއާި ނ ަމަވސެް ތ ެލ ގުެ އަގ 2009.ޕ ކާރިނ ފ ްގ ީ މިސަރ ަޙައްއ ެގުދެނހެ ް އެއޕަރ ޯޓްތ ކަާ އަޅ

ގާޯކ ހޭނ ްލޑް ްކުރ ޭނވެ ެކަމށަް ުބ42މއިިލަނ ް ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ްނ ށަް ޚިދ ުމަށްދ ޭނވެ ެކަމަށއ2.6ިާ ނ ިމޭއިރ ު ދަި. ނ ެފ ވިއަެވެެއހސާް ޓަނ ގުެ އ

Page 28: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 28/33

ެވެ  ެގ ފ ަހުނ ް ގްރ ުނއަ ްޑ2010ްއަދ ި ޖެނ ުއަރ ީ.މީގެއިތ ުރ ުނ ްވސެް އެކިފ ީތ ަކގުެ ރ ޭޓްތ ަކއާި ލ ަފ ާކުރ ާ ޓްރ ެފ ިކގްެ މަޢުލ ޫމާތ ުތ ށަް ހިމަނ ާފ ައިވެއ

ިވެ  ަނރުް  ިނނ ްމާފ ައވިާ ކަމަށްވެސް ުނބ ެފ ައ ިނލް ޗ ްގ ޖާް ބޮޑުކ ެވެހޭނ ްޑ  .އ

ެނގި ް.އެފ ް.ިމ އާރ ު ޫނ20ްޕ ީއއާި ގުޅ ާނިވައ 2010ީޖ )ބިޑރްރ ިސިޕ ޓްް ރ ެޖިސްޓާރ 9ެނއެ ސްްކ(.ފ ަރ ާތ ަކުން ވެެނ3ައގި ބިޑްހުށަހަޅާފ 

ަނޅަ ްޖެހޭ ެނއ ްމެފ ހަު ތ ާރ ީޚކަީ.އެފ ް. ނ ަމަވސެް އާރ ު ެވ17:00ެެގ2010ޖޫނ 13ްޕީ އަިގ ބިޑްހުށަހ ަލދަ ު ނ ޯޓިފ އަި.މިނ ިޓ މިތ ާރ ީޚށަް ގެނ ުނވެ ު ބ

ެނމު ށަް އއަި ގުަޅޑނ  :ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކކަީމިގޮތ ުނ ް ބިޑްހުށަހޅެި. ީސ އިނ ްއވިަދަނ ީ ބިލޭގޮތް ވުނެފ ައވެެ.އެފ ް.ކުރ ެވުނ ު އީމެއިލ ް ައ

ެޗް.ޭއ.އމެް/އާރ ު އިނ ްފ ްރ ާސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ލ ާރ ިމިޓޑެް.އމެް.ީޖ.1  ީބ.އ

 )ީޖ.ފ ުލ ްގފަފ ަނ ް ޒިއުރ ކިް ޭއ(ޔ ކިުނއުޭ/ޭކ.ީވ.ޭޖ.2

ި އޭ.ޭއ.ީޓ(އމެް.ޕ ީ.ީޑ.ޭއ/ީވ.ޭއ.ީޓ.3 ެފް.އމެް އާރ ު.ީޕ.ީޑ.ީވ އާއ ިނކަ ް ކުރ ިމަތ ިލ ާފ އަި.އ ޙުރަލ ާގައި ކަވިވ )ކއިު ަމ

ެނނެ ީބިޑްއވިެއުލޓޭް  :ކުރ ި ކޮމިޓީގއަި ހިމ

 ރ ައސީް އޮފ ސީް އިކޮނ ޮމކިް އޑެްއަވިޒަރ -ޢަލ ީ ޝިޔ މާް.1

ާމް.2 ަނއި ް އެއޓ ަރެކސްީ-އަޙްމަދ ު ނ ިޒ  މޯލ ްޑިވ

 ރ ީޖަނ ަލ ް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޑިޕ ާޓްމަނ ޓްް-އަޙްމަދ ު މަހްރ ީން.3

 މިނ ިސްޓްރ ީ އޮފ ް ފ ިނ ޭނ ސްް އެނ ޑްް ޓްރ ެޒަރ ީ-ޢަލ ީ އާރ ިފ ް.4

ަދުهللا ޢަބްދ ު.5  ސިވިލ ް އއިޭވޭޝަނ ް ޑިޕ ާޓްމަނ ޓްް-މުޙައްމ

ްނކެ ިކަލ ް އޑެްއަވޒިަ ެވެމގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް އޮބްޒާވަރ ްނނު އާި ޓ  .ރ ުނ ގްެ ގޮތު އަިގ ތ ިރ ީގައިމވިާ ފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކުނ ް ބައިވެރ ިވެފ ައިއެވ

ީމް.1  މެނ ޭޖިނ ް ޑައިރ ެކްޓމ ަރޯލ ްޑިވސްް އެއޕަރޯ ސްްޓ މޮކްޕ ެނ ީ ލ ިމިޓޑެް-މުޙައްމަދ ު އިބްރ ާހ

ިނއެ ް ސިރ ޖާް.2 ެނޕް ީ ލ ިމިޓޑެް-ހުސ  ބޑޯް ޑައިރ ެކްޓމ ަރޯލ ްޑިވސްް އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ކޮމ

  ީސ.އެފ ް.އއަި-މސިް ރ ަމަޓޓުް މަގގާީ.3

  ީސ.އެފ ް.އއަި-މސިް ނ ހެާ މެހެރ ާ.4

 ގޑިް ލ ޮޔ ެއޓްެ ނ ޮއެލ ް-މިސްޓޖ ަރޯނ ް ީޑ ކްރ ޮތ ސރާް.5

 ގޑިް ލ ޮޔ ެއޓްެ ނ ެލއޮ ް-މިސްޓފ ަރ ަބިއަނ ް ލ ަނ ްޓެރ ި މސަާ.6

ަން.7  ހަލ ްކްރ ޯ ގްރ ޫޕ ް-މިސްޓވ ަރިލ ިއމަް އާރ ު މިލ ިނ ޓްގ

ހަލ ްކްރ ޯ ގްރ ޫޕ ް-މިސްޓކ ަރްރ ިސްޓޮފ ޕ ަރ ެނ ް.8

ެނމި ެނ ްޖހެޭ މަތ ީގއަި ދ ްނނެ ުނވެ ު ހުރ ހިާ ިޔލ ުނ ްތ ކަެ ެނމު ް ބބިެލެލ މުުއަިގ މިތ ިނ ް ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ލ ގީަބ ްލިޑްގއަި ހ އްއަޅގުަޑނ

އަި.އމެް.ހުށަހަޅާފ ވިއަާ ކޯޕ ަރ ޓޭް ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ އަރށަް ބަލ ައިއާލިރ ު ީޖ.ޕ ީ ގައިގާވޮތ ށަް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައިވެއވެެ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ސްނޯޓިއަމްގ ނަީއާރ ު ޮކ ވ

ަރ ިމިޓޑެް.އމެް.ީޖ ެވެ%23އަދ ި މެލ ޭޝއިާ އެއޕަރ ޯޓްސް ޯލހ ްޑިގްނސްް ބެރ ްހޑާް%77އާރ ު އިނ ްފ ްރ ާ ސްޓްރ ަކްޗ ލ ުއޭ.އ ުނޔ ިކ

%20ީޖ.އަދ ި ޒިއުރ ކިް އެއޕަރ ޓޯް އިނ ްޓނަރ ޭޝަނ ަލ ް ޭއ%80ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއމަް ގވިައަނ ީ ޖޭވކީޭ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޑިވެލ ޮޕ ސރާް ޕ ްރ ައިވޓެް ލ ިމިޓޑެް

Page 29: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 29/33

އިޒުރ ކިް ޭއ.ްކ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް އިނ ްޓނަރ ަނޝޭ ަލް  އޭޒިއުރ ި.އވެެ ެވެ%100ީޖ ެގ.ީޖ އކަީ ފ ުލ ްގަފ ަނ ް ީވ.އޭ.ީޓ.ހިއްސވާާ ބަސްސއިިޑަރ ީއެކ

ަނވި ީ ީޓ ިއާ%25.5އމެް ިނއ ް.ޕ ީ.ީޑ.އޭ%39.5ީވ އިނ ް.ޭއ.ކޮނ ްސޯޓިއމަް ބިވާނެފ ައ އަދ ި ކެޕ ިޓަލް  ޑެއްވައިޒސރާް ޕ ޓާރްނ ސރަް އޭޝ

ްރޓް ަކްޗ ަރ 10ެނއ ެކސްް. (ެގ މައްޗ ަށވެެ%35ޕ ްރ ައިވޓެް ލ ިމިޓެޑގްެ  )ކޯޕ ަރ ޓޭް ސ

ެވެ ަނޝޭ ށަް ގޮސްފ ައ ަނޝޭ ިނއް ް ފ ާސވްެ ޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް އިވެލ ުއ ެލވި ުއ ަނޝޭ 11ްއެނެ ސްްކ(.މިތ ިނ ްބިޑވްެވްސަނ ީ ލ ަލގީ ް ބިޑްއ ބޑިް އިވެލ ުއ

 )ރ ިޕ ޓޯް

ޭނނި ްޝަލ ް އވިެއުލޭޝަނ ށަް ގޮސްފަ ވެެއ3ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ކިްނަލ ް އވިެއުލޭޝަން  ިނއ ް ފ ާސވްެ ފ ައ  .ބިޑްވސެް ަނވ ީ ޓެކ

ެވެ ުނކަ ް ފ ާހަގަކުރ ެވިފަ އެްއ ނު އެވ އެއްވސެް ބިޑ ް ޚ ާއިލ ާފ ުކަމއެް ެނމު ް ބބިެލެލ މުުއަިގސެްވ ޓެކްނ ަލކި ް ރ ިކުއމަރެނ ްޓްސ .އަޅގުަޑނ

ްނކެ ިކަލ ް.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ޭނހެ ެ ކަމށަް މަތ ީގއަި ބުނ ެފ ައވިާ ހުރ ހިާ ބައިތ ަކއެްޕ ީގއަި ޓ ަނނަ ްޖ ެވ3ެބިގްޑއަި ހިމ  .ބޑިްއަިގސެްވ ހިމަނ ާފ ައިއެވ

ަނޝޭ ް ކޮމިޓީނ ް ޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ބޑިް އިވެލ ުއޓޭް ކުރ ިއިރ ު ފ ުރ ަތ މަަ ަނވި ީ ީޖގއ2010ިަޖޫނ 21ްއިވެލ ުއ ެވެ.އމެް.ބަލ ާފ ައ މިގޮތ ުނ ް.އާރ ގުެ ބިޑެއެވެބެލ ިބެލު ގުމއަި ތ ިރ ގީަ ަނކާ ްތ އަް ފ ާހަގަކޮށްފ ައިވެއ  .ިއ މިވ

ެންރ ަނ ވްޭ މަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ާނ ެ ކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ އަި ވީމަނަވސެްއާރ ު ބިޑުގއަި.އމެް.ީޖ.1 ަނކި ް ަކޑނައގިެޅ ކިހާމުއްދ ަތ ެއގްެ ތ ެރ ޭގައ

ވިއަާ.ެއއްނ ެތެ ވެެއބުނ ެފ ަ ިނަކްގއ3.6ިައާރ ގުެ.ީޓ.އމެްެގއްރ ީމަނ ްޓްގ ެވެެގ ކުރ ިނ 2015ްމ .ކުރ ަނ ްޖހެޭ ކަމަށް ުނބ ެފ ައިއެވ

ެވެ  ަނރު ް ޖެހޭވަރ ގުެ ކަމަކަށްނ ބުައަލ ަނޝޭ ް ކޮމިޓިނ ް މއިީ ފ ެއިލ ްކ ވިއެލ ުއ ެނހެ ް ބިޑްތ ައް ެލބ ިއިރ ު. ނ ަމަވެސް ފ ަހުނ ް އ

ަނކި ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައިވަނީ  ޖީ  ަނޝޭ ް ރ ި.އމެް.އެބިޑްތ ކަުއަގިވސެް މ އަިއާރ ުނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ގޮތ ާ އެއްގޮތ ަށްކަމށަް އިވެލ ުއ ޕ ޯޓްގ

ެވެ   .ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ

ްލޕީ ޭން  ިނހ ްގާފ ަރ ާތ ގުެ މަސްއޫލ ްޔއި ަތ ގުެ ތ ެރ ޭގއަި ސީޕ ްލ ޭން  ިނހ ގްާ ފ ަރ ާތ ގުެ.އމެް.ީޖ.2 އާރ ު ބީޑގުެ އޮޕ ަރ ޭޝަނ ަލް  ްލޕޭ ގްނއަި ސެވެ  ަނމި ާފ ައިވެއ ްލއަ ުކުރ ުނ ް ހ ކެއަމއެް ހ ެނހެ ްތ ަ.ބޯޓަކށަް ކުއްލ ާލޙި ަތ އެް ދ ިމާވެއްޖެނ މަަ ގެއްރ ީމަނ ްޓގްެ އ  ނ ްތަ ގުނއަި ނަ ވަމސެް

ްޔއު އަް ހިފ ާފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ޯނޕް ްޑްވުމކަީ ކ ޙިްލާލ އަްކަތުގއަި ރ ެސ ވާގޮތ ުނ ް އަލ ިފ ާނ ް ނ ިއވްުގުެމ ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ިނ ުމއާި ކުއ

ެލވި ުއޝޭަކްނމޮި ެވެޓީނ ް މއިީ ިބކުރ ަނ ްޖެހޭކަމެއްކަމަށްވާތ ީ އ  .ްޑ ފ ެއިލ ް ކުރަ ޖްނެހޭވަރ ގުެ ކަމެއްކަމށަް ނ ބުައަލ

އަިގ ދ ުއވްާ އުޅދަނ ުފ ަހަރ ށަް ނ ުވދަނ ެވޭގޮތ ށަްގއަި ސީޕ ޭނލް 6.4ްއާރ ގުެ.ީޓ.އމެް.3 ފ ިޒިކަލ ް"ތ އަް ޖައސްާ ސަރ ަޙައްދ ށަް ަކޑުނ

ޭނހެ ެކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ވިއަެވެެއ"ބެރ ިއަރ  ުނހް ަނން ް ޖ ެނގް ް ސަރ ަޙައްދ ު ވަކިކުރ ާ.އމެް.ީޖ.އެއ ުނނޭ ްކޮށ ި ަނވ ީ ބއޮެ ބ ޑިބުގައ އާރ ު

ަނވި ީ.ގޮތ ަށވެެ ަނޝޭ ް ކޮމިޓީން  ިނނ ްމާފ ައ ަނކްި  ުނބ ެދ ެވިފ ިނއަ ުވާތ ީ މއިީ އމެް"ލ ް ބެރ ިއަރ ފ ިޒކިަ"އިވެލ ުއ އާި.ީޓ.ަކީއ ކޮބައ އާރ ު އ

.ޚިލ ާފ ވުީ ކަމށަް ބެލ ެނވެ ް ނ ެތ ްކަމަށވެެ

ކިޑގްެ ކުރ ެހުނ ްތަ ގުކައި ީޕސ ޭނލް ް ޓާމިނ ަލ ް ދ ޮތގެ ަކށަް ހުނ ްނ ާތ ީ މިކަނ ްސާފ ުކުރ ުމށަް ކްލ ެރ ިފ ިކޝޭައެްނ.ީވ.ޔ ކީުނއުޭ ޭޖ.4 ބޭ

ެވެއާރ ު.ީޓ.އމެް.ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ައވިެވެެއ ި ީޕސ ޭނލް ް ޓާމިނ ަލ ްތ އަް ބަދަ ކުލުރ ުމއެް ނ ުހމިެއެނ ެނގި ް ޭޖ.ގައ ިނަީވ.ީވ.މިކަމާގުޅ ޭކ ިނއް  ުނބ ެފ ައ

ސަޕެނ ޖްަ  ން  ަނއ ެއްތ ަނ ށަް ދ ެވޭގޮތ ށަް ހަދ ަނ ްރ ްނނު ށަް ފ ސަޭކަހަމާއކެު އެއްތ ަނުއެފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ޓާމިނ ަލ ް ޑިޒައިނ ްކުރ ުމުގައި

ާނވި ޭކަމަށއާި އހެެކްނަމުނ ް ދ ގިު ަނކް ްދ ީފ ައ މުއްދ ަތ ގުެ މާސްޓޕ ަރ ްލޭ ގްނއަި ސީޕ ޭނލް ްޓާމިނ ަލް  އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޓާމިނ ަލ ގްެ ކުރ ިމައްޗ ށަްއިސ

ަންއަދ ި ިމ.ގެނ ސެްއަފިވަނ ީ ކަމށަެވެެއ ަރފާ ާތ ްތ ކަާ ވާހަކަދ ެއްކުމަށްފ ހަު އެކަމށަްކ އެއްވސެް ހުރ ަހއެްކުރ ަނ ޏްާ ކުރ ާނ ީ ކަމާބހެޭ ހުރ ިހ

ަނޝޭ ް ޮކ.ކަމށަް ބުނެ އަފވިެވެެއ ނ ެތ ިއްޔ ާ ެލވި ުއ .މިޓީނ ް މިޖަވބާު ޤަބޫލު ށޮްކ މިބޑިް ފ ާސްކޮށްފ ައިވެއވެެއ

Page 30: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 30/33

ިޔވެ ަފ ާރ ގީެ ޚަރ ަދ ގުެ ތ ަފ ްސީލ ް ދ ީފ ައިވީނ ަމަވސެް.އމެް.ީޖ.5 ޙަރ ަދ ށަްއާރ ު ބީޑގްެ ސްޓްރ ެޓެޖކިް ޑިވެލ ޮޕ ްމަނ ޓްް ޕ ްލޭ ގްނއަި ތ ެލ ުގ

ާނގނި ެ ޢަދ ަދ އެް ވިއަާ ތ ާވަލ ުގއަި ދ ީފ ައެއްނ ުވާތ ީ އއ57ިާހ ކޮށްފ ައވިާ ޑޮމެސްޓކިް ޓްރ ެފ ކިް ވޮލ ިއމުްއށަް ލ ަފ 2010ާވަނ ަ ސަފ ްޙާގ

އ2009ިަ  ީސ އިނ ް ލ ަފ ާކޮށްފ ައވިާ ވަރ ަށްވުރ ެ.އެފ ް.ެގ އަސްލ ު ޢަދ ަދ ައްވުރ ެ މަދ ުވާތ ީ އއާި އިނ ަނޓް ޭޝަނ ަލ ް ޓްރ ެފ ކިް ވޮލ ިއމުް އ

ފ ްށަ ެނ ްނ ާތ ީ މިކަނ ްކަނ ް ސާފ ުކުރ ުމށަް ީޖ ޢާރ ށަް.އމެް.ބޮޑުނ މަަސެްވ އެއިރ ޯ ނ ޯޓިކަލ ް އާމްދ ަނ ީ އިތ ުރ ުވެފ ިނއަ ުވާކަމ

.ކްލ ެރ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ އެް ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ވިއަެވެެއ

ުނފަ ގްެ ޚަރ ަދ އާި ޔ ުޓިލ ިޓީއްސއާި.އމެް.މގީެ ޖަވބާުއަިގ ީޖ އުރިނ ް ބުނ ެފ ވިައަނ ީ ތެ ގުލިޔވެ ަފ ާރ ގީެ ހިގްނުމގުެ ޚަރ ަދ ު މުވައްޒ ާއ

ެވެ  ގްެ.މަރ ާމާތ ުކުރ ުމއާި އެހެނ ިހެނ ް ޚަރ ަދ ުތ ަކގުެ ޢަދ ަދ ުތ ަކގުެ ތ ެރ ޭގއަި ހިމެނޭ މަކަށއާި އެޢަދ ަދ ުތ ަކގުެ ތ ަފ ްސީލ ް ފ ޮނ ުވާފ ައިވެއ ބިޑ

އަމެކަނި  ޭނލ ޑްް ޕ ޭނލް ގްެ ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ގްެ ޢަދ ަދ ު ކަމަށއާިވަނ ަ ަސ12 ެނނެ ީ ަހ ވިއަާ ޑޮމެސްޓކިް ޓްރ ެފ ކިް ވޮލ ިއމުްއަިގ ހިމ ްޙފާގ

ެވެ. ސީޕ ޭނލް ް ނ ުހިމަނ ާ ކަމަށވެެ ޓްރ ެފ ކިް އިތ ުރ ުވާރ ޭޓްއިނ ް.މިޖަވބާުއަިގ ސީޕ ްލ ޭނ ް ޓްރ ެފ ިކއްާ އެކުހިމެނ ޭ ޢަދ ަދ ު ހިމަނ ާފ ައިވެއ

ްދަ  ެވެއެއިރ ޯނ ޯޓިކަލ ް އާމ މ ްސެވި ކްލ ެރ ިފ ިކޭޝަނ ގްެ ޖަވާބުގއަި ހިމަނ ާފ ވިައެއ . ނ ީ އިތ ުރ ުވާކަނ ް ދ ައްކައިދ ީފ ވިއަާ ހސިާއެްބ

ަނޝޭ ް ކޮމިޓީއިނ ް މޖިަބާުވ ޤަބޫލ ުކށޮް ބޑިް ފ ާސކިްވަމށަް ނ ިނ ާފމް ައިވަނ ީ ވޓޯް އިކްނަމށ2ްަވޓ3ްޯގއ2010ިަޖޫނ 24ްއިވެލ ުއ

ި ުނބ ެފ ައވިެވެެއ ަނޝޭ ް ރ ިޕ ޯޓްގައ  .އިވެލ ުއ

ެނމު ް ބބިެލެލ ުނމު ްމގީެ ެވެއިތ ުރ ުނ ް އަޅގުަޑނ މ ިައިވަނ ީއ  .ފ ާހަގަކުރ ެވުނު  ަނކ ްތ އަް ތ ިރ ީގ

ޓޯް/ޖޭވކީޭ މ ިައަތ ިނ ްދ ާ ބ ނެ ަނ ވްޭ ކޮޅުނ ް މަގުހެދ ުމއާި ސޭފ ޓްީ އޭރ އިާ ގެނުމގުެ ބަދ ަލ ުގ ރް ގިައ ަނވި ީ ބިނ އިްހްކ ުނޔީ އުޭކ ބިގްޑއަި ހުށަހަޅާފ ައ

ް ުނޭނބ ްކުރ ާ ޓެކްނ ޮ ާފޅަ ައވެެއަވަހށަް ހުއްޓުވުމަށ ުނނޭ ްކުރ ުމށަް ހުށަހ ަނވި ީ ތ ަފ ާތ ު.ލ ޖޮީ ބ ުނޅޮ ް މަގުހެދ މުުއަިގ ދ ީފ ައ އަދި  ަނރ ވްޭ ކ

ެވެ  .އވެެއެޅުމށަް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިެމިގޮތ ުނ ް ދ ެކުނ ުކޮޅުނ ް މޫދ ުމަތ ިނ ް އޅަާ ފ ާލ ަމަކުނ ް ނ ުވަތ ަ ޓަނ ަލ ްއއެް ބޭނު ކްނޮށްގެނ ް މގަު.އޮޕ ްޝަނ ްތ ކަެއެކ

ސ ިާއޭފ ޓްީ އޭރ ިއާއށަް ރ ަނ ްވޭއިނ ް ތ ަނ ްނ ެގުމަށްފ ހަު އުތ ުރ ުކޮޅުނ ް ބިނ ްގޮތ ކަީއަނ އެް ދ ެ ބިޑްގއަި ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ރ ަނ ްވގޭެ ދ ެކުނ ުކޮޅުނ ް މަގަށ

ގިައެން  ބެއއަި ރ ަން އޭވށަް އިތ ުރ ުކުރ ުމަށވެެ  .ހިއްކ

ވޭޕްމަނ ޓްްއަިގ ުނބެ އަފިވަނ ީ އޭޕ ްރ ަނ 3ްޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ރި އުކމަރެނ ްޓސްް އަހަރ ގުެ މުއްދ ަތ ަށް ޭނބ ުނ ްކުރ ެވޭ ެނފ ްވަރ ަކށ25ްަައގި އެއފަރ ިލ ޑްް

ެވެ  ޭނހެ ެކަމަށ ޯއ ގެ.އޭ. ީސ.އަދ ި އއAC 150/5320-6Eިަޭއ އެޑްވސިައަރ ީ ސާކިއުލ ަރ .ޭއ.މިގޮތ ުނ ް އެފ ް.ހެދ ިފ އަި ހުނ ްނ ަނ ްޖ

ޭނހެ ެ ކަމށަް.ީޑ.ޯއ ޭއ.އޭ. ީސ.އަދ ި އއ14ިަެސއް އެނެ ސްްކ.ީޕ.އާރ ު.ޭއ.އސެް ގ ްމއަި ބުނ ެފ ައވިާ ފ ެނ ްވަރ ށަް ހެދ ިފ އަި ހުނ ްނ ަނ ްޖ ެއ

ެވެ  ަނވި ީ އޭޕ ްރ ަނ ގްެ މުއްދ ަތ ކ40ީައމެް ބިޑގްެ.ީޕ.ީޑ.ޭއ/ީވ.އޭ. ނ ަމަވސެް ީޓ.ބުނ ެފ ވިައެއ އަގާޙި ބުނ ެފ ައ މިގޮތ ުނ ް.އަހަރ ުކަމަށވ20ެެވަނ ަސަފް 

އަވިސަރ ީ ސއިާކުލ ަރ ޭއ ެއ.އޭ.އެފ ް ގައވިާ ގޮތ ށަް ޕ ޭވްމަނ ޓްް އަޅާފ ިނ ަމަ ޭނބު ކްނުރ ެވޭނ ެ މުއްދ ަތ ކAC 150/5320-6Eީަްޑ

ެނހެ ް ބޑިެގްއއަި މިހެން  ުނބ ެފަ އެްއ ނ ވުެވެެއ.އަހަރ ުކަމަށވ20ެެ  . ނަ ވަމސެް އ

ަނޝޭ ް އިނ ް ފ ާސްވމުާކެުއ ޭނނި ްޝަލ ް އވިެއުލޭޝަނ ް ހަދ ާފ ައވިެވެެއތ ިނ ްބޑިްސެްވ ޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ވިއެލ ުއ ަނޝޭ ް.ިމ ތ ިނ ްބޑިްވެގސެް ފ ައ ެލވި ުއ މިއ

ޭނނި ްޝަލ ް ފ މޯރްގއަި.އެފ ް.ހަދ ާފ ައިވަނ ީ އާރ ު ެނގްި ވެެނާވީގެޕ ފ ައ އަލ ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެސެނ ޓްް ެލވ ިއުއށަް ަބ .ގޮތ ށަް ސަރ ުކާރ ަށްދ ައކްާ ޮކ

ާނލަ ީ އާރ ުއެފ ްޕ ީގއަި ދ ީފ ައވިާ ބސޭްއަިލމިގޮތ ުނ ް ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްބ ބިލޭނ ެ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ަށްދ ައކްާ ޮކ ސރެނ ްޓް ްއނިނ ް

ެވެމިގޮތ ުނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައިވާ ޮނކް ޝެސަނ ްފ ގީެ ތ ަފ ްސީލ ު.ގއަި ބުނ ެފ ވިއަެވެެއވެލ ިއުއަށްކަމށަް މިފ މޯު  .ތ ިރ ީގއަި މިވަނ ީއ

Page 31: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 31/33

ެޗް.އމެް/އާރ ު.އމެް.ީޖ  ޑޭީ/ޓީއވޭީ ކޭ.ީވ.ޖޭ/ޔ ކީުނއުޭ ީބ.އ ެމް.ީޕ.އ  އ

ާނކް ެަޙ ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ޢަދ ަދ ުވާލ ވުުގުެމ ކުރ ިނ ް ދ ައ ަލއި ް ޮކ މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔ ޫއސ78ްެ އިނ ީޝ ޑޮލ ަރ 

މިލ ިއަނ 27ް ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރ 

މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ7 ޑޮލ ަރ 

ިނެގ2014ްޙަވާލ ވުާ ތ ާރ ީޚުނ ްފ ެށިގެނ ް ެގ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ ވިއްކައ

 ނޫ ގްނޮތ ްގޮތ ށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކާނ ެ ޕ ެނސަ ްޓޖޭް 

1%27% 31% 

އިނ ް ފ ެށިގެނ ް ކޮނ ްޓްރ ޭކްޓގްެ މުއްދ ަތ ގުެ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ2015ޮގިައެން  ޫނނ ްގޮތ ްގޮތ ށަް ލ ބިޭ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްނާކެ ވިއްކ

 ޕ ަސެނ ްޓޖޭް

10% 9% 29.5% 

ެނގި ް ެނގި ް ލ ިބ2014ޭޙަވާލ ވުާ ތ ާރ ީޚުނ ްފ ެށ ެގ ނ ަލޔި ށަް ތ ެޔ ޮ ވިއްކައޭޖްއާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް  ދ ައްކާނ ެ ޕ ެނސަ ްޓ

15% 9% 16.5% 

އިނ ް ފ ެށިގެނ ް ކޮނ ްޓްރ ޭކްޓގްެ މުއްދ ަތ ގުެ ިޔނ ަލ ށަް ތ ެޔ2015ޮޭޖް  ގިައެނ ް ބިޭލ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކާނެ  ސަޕެނ ްޓ  ވިއްކ

27% 9% 16.5% 

އަި ެލވް އިު ކަލ އިްކުލ ޭޓްކުރ ުމުގއަި އ މިލި ނައ240ްހަރު ސެްވ އަހަރ ަކށަް ލ ިބޭއާމްދ ަނ ީައ25 ީސ އިބ ްނަލ ާފ ައިވަނ ީ.އެފ ް.މިގޮތ ުނ ް ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެސެނ ްޓ

ގިައެނ ް ނޫ ގްނޮތ ްގޮތ ުނ 180ްއއެީ ތ ެލ ގުެ ިޔވ ަފ ާރ ިނ ް.ޑޮލ ަރ ގުެ ރ ޭޓުނ ްނ ެވެ  ތި ދަ ެޔ ޮވިއްކ .މއިިލަނ ް ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލަ އެރވ60ެެމއިިލަނ ް ޑޮލ ަރ ު އ

ީނވި މަަސެްވ އއަި.އެފ ް.ގއަި ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ޓްް ވެލ އިު ހޯދ ާނ ީ އއ5.5.3ިަޕ ގީެ.އެފ ް.އާރ ު ެގ.އެފ ސްީ. އ ެގީސަނ ްދ ާޒާއށަް ބަލ ައިގެނ ް ކަމށަް ބުނ ެފ ައ

އަި/ީޕ.އެފ ް.އަނ ްދ ާޒާއކަީ މީކަމއެް އާރ ު ގްމއަި ބުނެ އަފއެް ނު އެވވެެ.އ އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ޮކ2008.ެއ އަނަހަރ ު ނ ިމުނ ުއިރ ު މޯލ ްޑިވސްް މްޕ ނެީަވ

ެނގި ް މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ38.1ިލމ ިއަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ ަރ އާި އެނޫ ގްނޮތ ްގޮތ ުނ 152.8ްލ ިމިޓެޑށަް އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ގޮތ ުގއަި ލ ިބިފ ައިވަނ ީ ތ ެޔ ޮވއިްއަކ

 .މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރެ ވެެއ190.9ޑޮލ ަރ ާއކެު މުޅިޖުމްލ ަ

ވެޭލ2008 ަނދް ިނއީް  ސަޕެނ ްޖަރ ަކށަް ޖހެޭ ޢަދ ަދ ކަީމއިިލަނ 2.5ްގއަި ޚިދ ުމަށްދ ެވޭނ ެ ކަމށަް ެބ އެއަހަރ ު ލ ބިޭ އާމ ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ް ލ ިބޭއިރު  އ75.1ިަ ެފް.އަދ ި އއަި.އމެް ގވިއަާ ހިސާބުތ ުނކްަ  ގނެެއވެެއ.ޫއޔސެް ޑޮލ ަރ ުކަމށަް އ  ސީ ިނއ ް ލ ަފ ާކޮށްފ ައވިާ ސޭބްކސޭް ސިނ ާރި ގޯއއަި.އ

ަށްމިލ ަނއި ް ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ް އަހަރ ކަު ިލ5.1 ނ ިމޭއިރ 2035ުިލމ ަނއި ް ޕ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ުނ ް ލ ޭނބި ެ ކަމަށއ2.6ިާގއ2010ިަ ބޭނ ެކަމ

ެވެ  ެފް.އހެެކްނަމުން  އަިއ.ލ ަފ ާކޮށްފ ައިވެއ ެވެމިލ ިއަނ ް ޑޮލ ަރ 240ަ ސީ ިނއ ް ބަލ ާފ ވިއަާ.އ  .ީކ ޕ ްރ ޫޑެނ ޓްް އެސްޓިމޭޓއެް ކަމށަް ބެލ ިދާ އެނ

ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެމަތ ީގއަި އވެާ އަނ ްދާ އާޒށަް ބަލ އަިމިގޮތ ުނ ް ެމް.އެނ ްމެބޑޮީ ީޖހޯދ ުނމު ް އެޢަދ ަދ ު ސެނ ޓްް ވެލ އިުޮކ ރާު.އ އ

ެވެ  އިެލުއކަީއެފ ަރ ާތ ގުެ.ކޮނ ްސޯޓއިަގްމެއ ކެނސްް. (މިލ ިއަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ އަރވ529.07ެެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެސެނ ްޓްވ ެނ12ްެއ ދ ިައ)ީވ ހިބާުސ.ީޕ.އ

ެވެިމ368އެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އާރު  ިނއ ް އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ގޮތު އަިގ ލ ިބޭނ ެ ކަމށަް.އމެް.އަދ ި ީޖ.ލ ިއަން  އޫޔސެް ޑޮލ އ ަރިން ސެވްޓްކުރ ަނ ް ހުށަޅާފ ވިައެއ

ަނކު ްލ ަފ ާކޮށްފ ައވިާ ޢަދ ަދ ުތ އަް  .ފ ާހަގަ ުރކ ެވެއވެެއެހެނ ް ބިޑްތ ަކާއޅަާ ބަލ ާއިރ ު ބޮޑ

ު ސްނޮކެޝަނ ްފ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ްޓްވެލި އުެއ ެވެ.ޕ ީ.ީޑ.އޭ/ީވ.ޭއ.ްއ ހށުަޅަހާފ ައިވަނ ީ ީޓދ ެވަނ ައަށް ެނއ ްމެބޮޑ ަނ483.45ްއއެީ.އެމގްެ ބިއެޑ މއިިލ

 .ކުރ ަނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިެވެެއއެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އިނ ްވެސޓްްމިލ ިއަން  އޫޔސެް ޑޮލ ަރ434ު ނ ަމަވސެް މިފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް.ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރެ ވެެއ

ިވަ ްނނި ެވެ.ީވ.ޖޭ/ ނ ީ ޔ ކީުނއުޭއެއޕަރ ޯޓށަް އެނ މްެ ބޮޑުޢަދ ަދ އެް ިނއް ސެވޓްް ކުރ ަނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައ މއިިލަނ ް ޔޫ ސެްއ594މިފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް.ޭކ ބިއްޑ

ަރިނ ްވެސޓްް ކުރ ަނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިެވެެއ ަނޝެ ްފ ގީެ ނ ެޓްޕ ްރ ެނސެ ްޓްވެލި އުއކަީ.ޑޮލ އ 280.35 ނަ ވަމސެް މިފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ހުށަހަޅާފ ައވިާ ކޮނ ްސ

ެވެ   .މިލ ިއަން  އޫޔސެް ޑޮލ ަރ ެއ

Page 32: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 32/33

ިފަ  ިޔމާ ާބުކުރ ެވ ުނމަ ް މިބޑިް ކ ސްނެޝަނ ްފ ނެ ގީ ޓެް ޕ ްރ ެސެނ ޓްް ވެލި އުއއެް ހުށަހޅެި ީޖއެހެނ ްކ ަނވި ީ އެނ މްެ ބޑޮު ޮކ ެމް.އ ަމް.އ އާރު  ޮނކ ްސޯޓިއ

 .އަށވެެ

 އެގްރ ީމަނ ޓްް

ްފށޮ ައިވަނ ީ.އމެް.ިމ ބީލ ަނ ް ކާމިބާޔުކުރ ި ީޖ ބްައވްސުމުގައި އޮސިކ ވެެއ2010ޖޫނ 28ްއާރ ު އާއކެު ެއ )އެގްރ ަނމީ ޓ13ްްެނއ ެކސްް(.ަގ

ެވެ  ަލބް ާއިރ ު ތ ިރ ީގއަި މިވާކަނ ްތ އަް ފ ާހަގަކުރ ެވެއ  .މިއއެްސަބްވމުުއަގވިާ މައިޑނަުގ ކަނ ްތ ަކަށ

ީައަހަރެ ވެެއ25އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ކުއްޔ ަށްދ ީފ ައވިާ މުއްދ ަތ ކ. 

ެްނނި ެވ ެނޕް ީ އ ަނޝޭ ގްެ ޚިދ ުމަތ ް ދ ޭނ ީ މޯލ ްޑިވސްް އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ކޮމ  .އެއޓަރްރ ެފ ކިް ކޮނ ްޓްރ ޯލ ް އއާި ނ ެވިގ

ިަެވެއެއޕަރ ޯޓްގއ ެނމި ޭ ހުރ ހިާ އެސަޓއެް އިޤްތ ިސާދ ީ ފ ައިދ ާ ހޯދ ަނ ް ހުއްދ ަދ ީފ ައިވެއ  .ހ

ިަޭއ ސވާރސިް ވެލެލ ް ީސ ެގ ފ ެނ ްވަރު އަިގ ޚިދ ުމަތ ްދ ވެޭ އެއަޓޯޕރަކށަް ވާނ ްޖެހޭނެ ވެެއ.ީޓ.ޭއ.އއ. 

ްީެނޕް ގީެ ލ ބިައިލ ިޓސ .ވެއށަް ޙަވާލ ވުާ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ޒިނ ްމާވާކށަް ނ ޖުެއެެހ)ދ ަރ ަނ ިތ ށަް(އެއޕަރ ޯޓސްް ކޮމ

ެްެވެމހ4ަަކޮނ މ ަނކް ްޖހެޭ ފ ީތ ަކާއކެު ރ ިޕ ޯޓްތ އަް ހުށަހަޅަނ ްޖެހެއ .ކުނ ް ދ ައ

ިިއަހަރ ުފ ަހުނ ްނ ެވ2ެކުރ ާތ ާމުވައްޒަފ ުނ ް ވަކިކުރ ެވޭނީ  ވަޙާލ ުމިހާރ ު ތ ބ.

ެެަނކެ ް ކުރ ާފ ަރ ާތ ްތ ަކުނ ްނ ވ . ސީޕ ޭނލް ް އޮޕ ަރ ޭޝަނ ްތ އަް ިނހ ާނގް ީ މިހާރ ުވސެް އ

ެްނނި ގަާ ފ ީތ އަް ނ ޭނގެ ީ ތ ިރ ީގައިމވިާ ގޮތ ގުެ މަތ ިނ ްނ ެވ .އެއޕަރ ޓޯް އ

oްަސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ނ ަގާފ ީތ އ 

ްާޕ ަސެނ ްޖސ ަރސިވާް ޗ ޖ

ީ އެއޓ ަރްރ ެފ ކިް ފ

o

ޙަވާލ ވުާ ފ ަރ ާތ ުނ ް ނ ޭނގެ ެ ފ ީތ އަްްާޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރ 25ުއިނ ް ފ ެށިގެން  ސަޕެނ ްޖަރެ ގްެއ އަތ ުނ 2012ްއެއޕަރ ޓޯް ޑިވެލ ޮޕ ަނމް ޓްް ޗ ޖ

ްާެނރަ ްސް ާޗސ ޖރ ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ޕ ަރ ެނސަ ްޖަރ ަކށ2ްައިނ ްޝުއ

ީ ލ ޭނ ްޑިނ ް ފ

ީ ޕ ާކިނ ް ފ

ްާގްރ ައުނ ޑްް ހޭނ ްލޑް ިނ ް ޗ ާޖސރ

ޯ ޔ ޫއސެް ޑޮލ ަރ 100ބްރ ޖިް ފ ީ ބޭނ ުނ ްކުރ ާ ކޮނ މްެ ފ ަހަރ ަކށަްއެއިރ

ްާފ ިއުލ ް ޗ ާޖސރ

ުިކޮމާޝަލ ް ރ ެވެނ އޭިްލނެ ބ ކުލ ިތ ަނ ްތ ަނ ް ކުއްޔ ށަް ދ ީގ

ޭ ހނެހެން  އެއިރ ޯނ ޯޓިކަލ ް ފ ީ ތ އަް ސީޕ ޭނލް ގްެ ލ  ްޑނިނ ް ފ ީ އއާި ެއ

ަރހަ ަކުނ ް އެއިރ ޯ ނ ޯޓިކަލ ްފ ީތ އަް ޔ ޫއސެް ކޮނ ްސިއމުާ ޕ ްރ ސިއަް އިނ ޑްެސްކްއށަް ނި ބްސަތ ްކށޮް އިނ ްފ ްލ ޭޝަނ ަށ3ްމގީެ އިތ ުރ ުނ ް ކޮނ މްެ އ

 .އެޖަސޓްް ކުރ ެވޭނެ ވެެއ

Page 33: Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

7/30/2019 Report on Assessment of Male International Airport Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-on-assessment-of-male-international-airport-privatization 33/33

  ނ ިނ ްމުނ ް

ޕރައއެ ޯޓސްް ކޮމްޕ އީެނިނ ް ވޭތ ުވެދ ިޔ ަ ީލ3ްމޯލ ްޑިވސްް އ އަހަރ ު ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ޙިއްސގާެ ފ ައިދ ގާެ ގޮތ ުގއަި ލ ިބިފ ައވިާ އާމްދ ަނ ގީެ ތ ަފ ްސ

ެވެ   )ބަޖޓެް ރ ިޕ ޓޯް ތ ަކުނ ް ނ ަގާފ އަި(.ތ ިރ ީގއަި މިވަނ ީއ

171,506,451.00

 ރ ުފ ިޔ ާ

65,525,085.00

 ރ ުފ ިޔ ާ

62,790,164.00

 ރ ުފ ިޔ ާ

ެވ2008ެ އ ަންނާމްދ ަނ ީ ވަނ ީ ވަރ ަށްބޮޑުތ ަނ ް ދ ަށަށްގޮސްފ ައ ެނޕް ީއިނ ް ބިލމެުއްަނ ަނވަ ހައަރ 2008ު.ވަނަ ހައަރ ުނ ް ފ ެށިގެނ ް އެއޕަރޯ ސްްޓ ކޮމ

ކ ެނަމށަް ބަލ އަި އެއާމްދ ަނ ީއަހަރ ށަް ލ 25ިޑިވިޑެނ ްޑގްެ ގޮތ ުގއަި ލ ުނބި ު އާމްދ ަނ ީ ކުރ ިއށަް އޮތ ް ެގ ރ ޭޓުނ ް ޑިސްކައުނ ޓްް ކުރ ުމުނ ް%10ޭބ

ްނނަ ަ ޕ ްރ ެސެނ ޓްް ވއިެލުއކަީ އާރ ު ބޑިްއަިގ އެއޕަރ ޓޯް.އމެް.ީޖ(171.5/12.85x9.077).މިލ ަނއި ް ޔޫ ސެްއ ޑޮލ ަރެ ވެެއ121.14އ

ނެ ޭނބި ެކަމށަް ލ ަފ ާކުރ ާ އާމްދ ަނ ިނއީ ް ލް ގިައ ްޓ ކުރ ުމުނ ް އަނ ންަެގ ރ ޭޓުނ ް ޑިސްކައުނ ް%10އަހަރ ުތ ެރ ޭ ސަރ ުކާރ ށަް ދ ައްކާފ ީތ އ25ްަހިނ ްގ

ްސް. (މިލ ިއަން  އޫޔެސް ޮލޑ ަރ ެއވ973.91ެެޕ ްރ ެސެނ ޓްް ވއިލެުކަީއ ކެނ ަން)15ެއ ުނލްޫ  އެއޕަރ ޓޯް ހިގްނ ަނޝެ ގްެ އުސ ުނމްަ  ޮނކ ްސ ެހއެނ ްކ

 .ފ ެނ ެއވެެރ ށަް ލ ބިޭ މާލ ީނ ަފ ާ މާބވޮާކެނަމށަްޙަވާލ ުކުރ ުނމު ް ސަރ ކުާ

ީ ން ިނއ ުލ ިބވިާ ަނކ ް.އެފ ް.އިލ ްތ އަް އަިއރ ިޕ ޓޯް ތ ައްޔ ާރ ުކުރ މުާ ހަމައަށްވސެް ބައއެް އމީެ  )14ެނއެ ސްްކ(. ސ

ދުިޓެކްނ ިކަލ ް ެލވި ުއޓޭް ކުރ ުމުގއަި ނ ަތ ީޖާއށަް ބަދ ަލ ު ނ ްނނާ ާނ ެ ކ ިނރު ަމަވސެްބޑިް އ މޅުި ބީލ ަމުގެ ަނކ ްތ އަް ކެއަށގީެވްާނމައްސަލ ަތ ަކއެް ހ

ެވެ  ގްނޮސްފ ައިކާވަނ ް ފ ާހަގަކުރެ އެވ  .ރ ގަނޅަު ފ ެނ ްވަރ އެްއަިގ ެގ

 2010ޑިސެމްބަރ 23ު