report on polish students' performance year 1

E R A S M U S + P R O J E C T

MULTIDISCIPLINARY FLIPPED LEARNING

WITH ICTREPORT ON POLISH STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

YEAR 1prepared by Joanna Wilczyńska

from Publiczne Gimnazjum nr 30 im. Adama Mickiewicza w Łodzi, POLSKA

2015 – 2017Turkey is the Main Coordinator of the Project

Participant Schools are Lithuania, Poland, Italy, Latvia, France, Portugal, Spain

KA2 - Cooperation for Innovation and the Exchange of Good PracticesStrategic Partnerships for Schools Only

Project Number: 2015-1-TR01-KA219-021988

KA2 - Cooperation for Innovation and the Exchange of Good PracticesStrategic Partnerships for Schools Only-European Union Project

Web Page : http://flippedlearning.wix.com/homee-Twinning : https://twinspace.etwinning.net/12713/homeBlog : http://flippedlearning2015.blogspot.com.trFace Page : www.facebook.com/FLwICTFace Group : FLwICT 2015-2017 (students) – Closed Group

Multidisciplinary Flipped Learning with ICT-FLwICTThe Project Call: 2015 - 2017The Main Coordinator Country: TurkeyProject Number: 2015-1-TR01-KA219-021988 Participant Countries: Turkey-Lithuania-Latvia-Italy-Poland-Portugal-Spain-France

2

The goal of this evaluation is to obtain information about the quality of the Polish students’ performance in terms of 4 key competences in the frame of lifelong learning:

Digital skills Cultural awareness and expression Communication in mother tongue Communication in foreign languages

The evaluation was made mostly for 33 Polish students who constitute the project group. Some questions, though, were intended for only 12 students who attended meetings in Italy, Spain and Latvia during the 1st year of the FLwICT project.

http://flippedlearning.wix.com/home




3

SEPTEMBER 2015PREPARATION OF THE PROJECT BOARD




4

He/she ooperated with other students

His/her motivation is high

He/she studied consistently and productively

He/she completed the work on time

He/she did the work selflessly

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

4321

CONCLUSION:

Students agreed in 100% that cooperation with others is not a problem to them. The work in the project gave them satisfaction and they performed all the tasks according to the deadline.




5

OCTOBER 2015CREATING THE PROJECT LOGO




6

He/she

used th

e com

puter p

rogram

for d

esign

ing the

logo p

roperl

y

He/she

design

ed re

ally cr

eative

logo

He/she

did the w

ork se

lflessl

y

He/she

coop

erated

with ot

her stu

dents

His/her

motivat

ion is

high

He/she

studie

d consi

stentl

y and p

roducti

vely

He/she

comple

ted th

e work

on tim

e

He/she

publish

ed th

e work

on th

e e-tw

inning w

ithou

t any p

roblem

s

He/she

publish

ed th

e work

on fa

ce grou

p05

101520253035

1234




7

CONCLUSION:Students recognized their work on the logo design as creative and fully satisfying. 100% of all questions were given the highest number of points defining the cooperation with others, their motivation and the use of time as perfect.




8

NOVEMBER 2015PREPARING A DIGITAL POSTCARD




9

He/she used the logos of Erasmus+ and NA correctly

He/she used the name of the project

He/she defined the sources

He/she improved language skills

He/she took care to use proper English language

He/she researched enough

He/she cooperated with other students




He/she published the work on the e-twinning without any problems

He/she published the work on face group

0 10 20 30 40

4321




10

CONCLUSION:100% of students were rated highest in terms of their cooperation with others, motivation to work and the use the time. The survey also indicates that there were no problems with publishing materials on educational platforms. The execution of the tasks in time was done productively.




11

JANUARY 2016PREPARING A PRESENTATION ABOUT CYBERBULLYING




12













0 1 2 3 4 5

4321




13

CONCLUSION:The survey was carried out for 4 students who represented the school at the 2nd meeting in Italy: Jakub, Krzysztof, Dawid and Patryk. All the questions were given the highest number of points, thus assessing their work, motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time, the use of computer technology and English, as very good.




14

FEBRUARY 2016PREPARING A PRESENTATION ABOUT CULTURE




15













0 1 2 3 4 5

4321




16

CONCLUSION:The survey was carried out for 4 students who represented the school at the 3rd meeting in Spain: Aneta, Natalia, Paweł and Filip. All the questions were given the highest number of points, thus assessing their work, motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time, the use of computer technology and English, as very good.




17

MARCH 2016PREPARING AN E-GUIDE ABOUT CULTURE




18













4321




19

CONCLUSION:The survey was carried out for all 12 students who represented the school at all the meetings so far (in Italy, Spain and Latvia). All the questions were given the highest number of points, thus assessing their work, motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time, the use of computer technology and English, as very good.




20

APRIL 2016PREPARING A PRESENTATION ABOUT CUSTOMS AND ETIQUETTE




21













0 1 2 3 4 5

4321




22

CONCLUSION:The survey was carried out for 4 students who represented the school at the 4th meeting in Latvia: Magdalena, Monika, Michał and Przemysław. All the questions were given the highest number of points, thus assessing their work, motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time, the use of computer technology and English, as very good.




23

SEPTEMBER - MAY 2016WORKING WITH PEN PALS




24

He/she registered on Facebook group for students

He/she registered on eTwinning platform

He/she registered on any other platform

He/she was active in chats, e-mail exchange and group work during meetings


His/her posts were popular among peers from abroad


His/her impressions after international meetings were posted on platforms

0 10 20 30 40

4321




25

CONCLUSION:In the survey summarizing the work in one year of the

project, it is shown that 100% of the students did not have any problems using educational platforms used in the project. It is evident that the work on these platforms was interesting for them.

So far more than half of them was collaborating actively with others on Facebook. Others were passive. This is mainly due to the fact that not all of them were involved in the foreign visits so far. Hence, 39% of the students were rated in their activity in chat rooms and e-mail exchange, as very poor. We should pay more attention to that in the following year and encourage students to more contacts and not only right before an international exchange.

The same 39% of students were rated as poor in using their English effectively. Only 50% of students’ actions were considered attractive for colleagues from abroad. 28% were considered to be very good. 35% of students in question were not involved actively on Facebook and in exchanging e-mails in the first year. This is due to the fact that they were not among the students going abroad. They will improve their performance next year.

Half of the students were assessed very good, meaning that they had no problems with the publication of materials on various platforms.




26




27




28




29

Evaluation prepared by

Dorota Zajączkowska, Agnieszka Pawlak and Joanna Wilczyńskafrom

Publiczne Gimnazjum nr 30 im. Adama Mickiewicza w Łodzi, Polska

‘This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the

information contained therein.’

report on polish students' performance year 1

Documents