report on surveys: appendices a and b 770kb

49
Appendix A – Roadside Interview Questionnaire

Upload: duongnguyet

Post on 16-Jan-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Appendix A – Roadside Interview Questionnaire

Page 2: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

TfSH - ROADSIDE INTERVIEW FORMINTERVIEWER .......................................................... CODED BY .............................................. STATION DATE TIME PERIOD START

SERIAL NUMBER CHECKED BY .............................................. NUMBER ................ ...................... ………………………

1 1 2 5 9 15 0

VEHICLE NO. Would you please tell me the exact address Reason for being And the exact address you are going to now Reason for going Did you use the If yes, at which junction did At which junction did

TYPE OCC you have just come from? (your last stop please) there ? (your next stop please) there ? Motorway for part you join the Motorway? you leave the Motorway?

of your journey

1 Car/Taxi 1 8 Firm or 1 Home Firm or 1 Home 1 Yes Motorway Motorway

2 LGV 2 9 House Name 2 Hol Home House Name 2 Hol Home 2 No

3 OGV 1 3 10 Number & Street 3 Work Number & Street 3 Work Jn number Jn number

4 OGV 2 4 11 4 Empl Bus 4 Empl Bus

5 Buses/Coaches 5 12 Town 5 Education Town 5 Education

6 Motorcycles 6 13 6 Shopping 6 Shopping

7 Pedal Cycles 7 14< County 7 Pers Bus County 7 Pers Bus

8 Visit Friends 8 Visit Friends

Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure

……………. 0 OTHER (specify) 0 OTHER (specify)

19 1 23 .......................... 31 32 .......................... 40 41 42 46

1 Car/Taxi 1 8 Firm or 1 Home Firm or 1 Home 1 Yes Motorway Motorway

2 LGV 2 9 House Name 2 Hol Home House Name 2 Hol Home 2 No

3 OGV 1 3 10 Number & Street 3 Work Number & Street 3 Work Jn number Jn number

4 OGV 2 4 11 4 Empl Bus 4 Empl Bus

5 Buses/Coaches 5 12 Town 5 Education Town 5 Education

6 Motorcycles 6 13 6 Shopping 6 Shopping

7 Pedal Cycles 7 14< County 7 Pers Bus County 7 Pers Bus

8 Visit Friends 8 Visit Friends

Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure

……………. 0 OTHER (specify) 0 OTHER (specify)

19 2 23 .......................... 31 32 .......................... 40 41 42 46

1 Car/Taxi 1 8 Firm or 1 Home Firm or 1 Home 1 Yes Motorway Motorway

2 LGV 2 9 House Name 2 Hol Home House Name 2 Hol Home 2 No

3 OGV 1 3 10 Number & Street 3 Work Number & Street 3 Work Jn number Jn number

4 OGV 2 4 11 4 Empl Bus 4 Empl Bus

5 Buses/Coaches 5 12 Town 5 Education Town 5 Education

6 Motorcycles 6 13 6 Shopping 6 Shopping

7 Pedal Cycles 7 14< County 7 Pers Bus County 7 Pers Bus

8 Visit Friends 8 Visit Friends

Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure

……………. 0 OTHER (specify) 0 OTHER (specify)

19 3 23 .......................... 31 32 .......................... 40 41 42 46

1 Car/Taxi 1 8 Firm or 1 Home Firm or 1 Home 1 Yes Motorway Motorway

2 LGV 2 9 House Name 2 Hol Home House Name 2 Hol Home 2 No

3 OGV 1 3 10 Number & Street 3 Work Number & Street 3 Work Jn number Jn number

4 OGV 2 4 11 4 Empl Bus 4 Empl Bus

5 Buses/Coaches 5 12 Town 5 Education Town 5 Education

6 Motorcycles 6 13 6 Shopping 6 Shopping

7 Pedal Cycles 7 14< County 7 Pers Bus County 7 Pers Bus

8 Visit Friends 8 Visit Friends

Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure Postcode 9 Rec/Leisure

……………. 0 OTHER (specify) 0 OTHER (specify)

19 4 23 .......................... 31 32 .......................... 40 41 42 46

Page 3: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Site No.

Q1 - WHAT TYPE OF VEHICLE Q3 - PLEASE PROVIDE THE FULL ADDRESS YOU HAVE JUST COME FROM? Q4 - WHAT WAS YOUR REASON WERE YOU DRIVING? INC. POSTCODE IF POSSIBLE (i.e. the PREVIOUS stop before receiving this card) FOR BEING THERE?

07:00 1: Car/Taxi 1: Home07:30 2: Light Goods Vehicle Firm/House 2: Holiday Home08:00 3: HGV1 (2 or 3 axle RIGID) Name, No. & 3: Normal Place Of Work08:30 4: HGV2 Street 4: Employers Business09:00 (4 Axle RIGID or ALL ARTICULATED) 5: Education09:30 5: Bus/Coach Town 6: Shopping10:00 6. Motorcycle 7: Personal Business10:30 7: Other (please state) 8: Visit Friends11:00 9: Recreation/ Leisure11:30 County 10: Other (please state)

To maintain confidentiality, the addresses provided will be reduced to postcodes only. In addition, the results of the survey will contain no details of, or reference to, any individual journey. Thank you for taking the time to assist us in this process. Should you require any more information about these surveys please call Transport for South Hampshire on 01962 846288.

SOUTH HAMPSHIRE TRAFFIC SURVEY

Transport for South Hampshire is conducting roadside traffic surveys in South Hampshire. The information from these surveys will be used to inform future land use planning and transport development decisions. Please complete the questionnaire in relation to the journey you were making when you received the form. When you have done that please return it in the FREEPOST envelope provided.

Time of Issue(Office use only)

11:30 County 10: Other (please state)12:00

12:30 Postcode13:00

13:30

14:00 Q2 - NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS Q5 - PLEASE PROVIDE THE FULL ADDRESS YOU ARE GOING TO NOW? Q6 - WHAT IS YOUR REASON

14:30 IN VEHICLE? (including driver) INC. POSTCODE IF POSSIBLE (i.e. the NEXT stop after receiving this card) FOR GOING THERE?

15:00 1 1: Home15:30 2 Firm/House 2: Holiday Home16:00 3 Name, No. & 3: Normal Place Of Work16:30 4 Street 4: Employers Business17:00 5 5: Education17:30 6 Town 6: Shopping18:00 7 7: Personal Business18:30 8 8: Visit Friends

9 9: Recreation/ Leisure

10 County 10: Other (please state)

11

12 Postcode

13

14+

Q8 - IF YES, AT WHICH JUNCTION DID YOU JOIN THE MOTORWAY? Q9 - AT WHICH JUNCTION DID YOU LEAVE THE MOTORWAY?

1. YES 2. NO MOTORWAY JN NUMBER MOTORWAY JN NUMBER

Q7 - DID YOU USE THE MOTORWAY FOR PART OF YOUR JOURNEY?

Page 4: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

1301

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

Appendix B – RSI Information by Site

1 A35 Redbridge Westbound on slip

1.1.1 The RSI survey on the A35 Redbridge westbound slip road is situated on a key access route

from central Southampton to the west. The road serves a large industrial and commercial

area along Southampton docks, and connects to the M271 and in turn the M27. The road

comprises of sections of 2 and 3 lane dual carriageways. The slip road on which the RSI was

conducted comprised of 2 westbound lanes.

Figure 1.1 Location of A35 Redbridge RSI site and Approved Traffic Management

Plan

1.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established. Figure 1.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 5: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Number of Interviews  (All Vehicles)

Manual  Class ified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage  of vehicles  interviewed

Figure 1.2 Number of Interviews Completed

1.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 9.5%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 12.0%, IP was 9.1% and the PM peak was 8.4%.

1.1.4 Figure 1.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

Figure 1.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

1.1.5 Figure 1.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class ified Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

A35 redbridge  westbound on slip

Page 6: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Car 8042 75%

LGV 982 9%

HGV 1445 13%

Other 335 3%

MCC in Interview Direction: A35 redbridge westbound on slip

Car 765 79%

LGV 99 10%

HGV 100 10%

Other 8 1%

Number of Interviews: MCC in Interview Direction: A35 redbridge westbound on slip

Figure 1.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by A35 Redbridge

Road MCC

1.1.6 Figure 1.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

1.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. A stoppage in interviewing at the RSI is evident in the 1500-1530 period,

which will have been as a consequence of severe weather, safety concerns regarding the

traffic management, severe queuing or police officers operating the site having to temporarily

leave to attend urgent policing matters.

1.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 1.1 below. A reasonable proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 11.12. Car driver responses were

slightly underrepresented, partially as a consequence of the stoppage in interviews, but also

as a consequence of interviewing a greater number of HGVs, which tend to occupy more

interview bay capacity and so reduce the number of cars that can be interviewed per cycle.

Page 7: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Table 1.1 A35 Redbridge Road - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Redbridge

Road

(A335)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 11.4% 8.7% 7.7% 9.0% 8.78 11.44 13.03 11.12

Car 12.0% 9.1% 8.4% 9.5% 8.31 10.94 11.85 10.51

LGV 13.8% 10.3% 4.8% 10.1% 7.24 9.75 20.78 9.92

HGV 9.1% 6.8% 4.7% 6.9% 11.00 14.65 21.29 14.45

Other (TfSH) 1.2% 3.4% 2.0% 2.4% 86.00 29.60 50.50 41.88

Page 8: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

1304

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (All Vehicles)

Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Brownhill Way

2 Brownhill Way

2.1.1 The RSI survey on Brownhill Way was situated near the junction with the M271. The road

serves as a link between Romsey Road (A3057) and the M271. There are large areas of

employment close to the site at nearby Nursling Industrial Estate, as well as a number of

high profile premises lining the M271 to the north. The road comprises of single lane

carriageways.

Figure 2.1 Location of Brownhill Way RSI site and Approved Traffic Management

Plan

2.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established. Figure 2.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Figure 2.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Page 9: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Brownhill Way

Car 6995 89%

LGV 634 8%

HGV 183 2%

Other 92 1%

MCC in Interview Direction: Brownhill Way

Car 987 92%

LGV 68 6%

HGV 8 1%

Other 9 1%

Number of Interviews: Brownhill Way

2.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 14.1%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 11.2%, IP was 17.7% and the PM peak was 12.2%.

2.1.4 Figure 2.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. This data is

assessed alongside averaged ATC data, recorded over a period of 2 weeks from a location

within a reasonable proximity to the RSI/MCC site.

Figure 2.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

2.1.5 This assessment highlights possible anomalies in traffic flows encountered on the day of the

RSI, which may either be as a consequence of a road traffic accident, roadworks or an event.

Alternatively anomalies may occur because of the presence of the RSI itself, often through

‘site avoidance’. In this instance traffic flows recorded by the MCC correspond closely in both

directions with the ATC data.

2.1.6 Figure 2.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

Figure 2.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Brownhill Way

MCC

Page 10: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

2.1.7 Figure 2.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

2.1.8 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are slightly fewer completed interviews for HGVs than would be

anticipated based on the MCC.

2.1.9 HGVs can be problematic to interview as they often struggle to manoeuvre into the interview

bay, particularly with larger vehicles or at more constrained sites. In this case the interview

bay was narrow and so would not have been able to sample an equivalent proportion of HGVs

to cars and LGVs.

2.1.10 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 2.1 below. A reasonably high proportion of interviews were captured

relative to overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 7.37.

Table 2.1 Brownhill Way - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors Ratio of counts to interviews

Brownhill

Way

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 10.9% 16.9% 11.7% 13.6% 9.16 5.92 8.57 7.37

Car 11.2% 17.7% 12.2% 14.1% 8.93 5.66 8.23 7.09

LGV 9.4% 14.9% 6.6% 10.7% 10.59 6.71 15.09 9.32

HGV 5.1% 3.8% 5.0% 4.4% 19.50 26.00 20.00 22.88

Other (TfSH) 11.8% 3.7% 12.9% 9.8% 8.50 27.00 7.75 10.22

Page 11: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

1305

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

1305

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Romsey Road

3 Romsey Road (A3057)

3.1.1 The RSI survey on Romsey Road is situated on a key north-west access route into

Southampton. The road passes through largely residential areas in the outer suburbs, before

eventually becoming Shirley High Street. The road comprises of two single lanes.

Figure 3.1 Location of Romsey Road RSI site and Approved Traffic Management

Plan

3.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a northbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established. Figure 3.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Figure 3.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Page 12: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Romsey Road

Car 3789 91%

LGV 249 6%

HGV 51 1%

Other 72 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: Romsey Road

Car 1104 91%

LGV 81 7%

HGV 15 1%

Other 8 1%

Number of Interviews: Romsey Road

3.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 29.1%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 27.0%, IP was 37.0% and the PM peak was 22.3%.

3.1.4 Figure 3.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. This data is

assessed alongside averaged ATC data, recorded over a period of 2 weeks from a location

within a reasonable proximity to the RSI/MCC site.

Figure 3.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

3.1.5 This assessment highlights possible anomalies in traffic flows encountered on the day of the

RSI, which may either be as a consequence of a road traffic accident, roadworks, or an event.

Alternatively anomalies may occur because of the presence of the RSI itself, often through

‘site avoidance’. In this instance traffic flows recorded by the MCC correspond reasonably

closely in both directions with the ATC data, although the AM and PM peaks are notably lower

in the MCC flows. Figure 3.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the

survey site as recorded by the MCC.

Figure 3.4 Composition of traffic flow recorded by Romsey Road MCC

Page 13: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

3.1.6 Figure 3.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

3.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows.

3.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 3.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 3.44.

Table 3.1 Romsey Road - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Romsey

Road

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 26.6% 36.7% 22.6% 29.0% 3.77 2.73 4.42 3.44

Car 27.0% 37.0% 22.3% 29.1% 3.70 2.70 4.49 3.43

LGV 26.7% 36.5% 33.9% 32.5% 3.74 2.74 2.95 3.07

HGV 22.2% 32.4% 25.0% 29.4% 4.50 3.09 4.00 3.40

Other (TfSH) 4.2% 16.7% 13.3% 11.1% 24.00 6.00 7.50 9.00

Page 14: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

1303

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

Figure 4.2 Number of Interviews Completed

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Millbrook Road

4 Millbrook Road (A33)

4.1.1 The RSI survey on Millbrook Road (A33) was situated on the key westbound access route

between central Southampton and the west. The road serves large industrial and commercial

areas along Southampton docks, and connects to the M271 and in turn the M27. The road

comprises of sections of 2, 3 and 4 lane dual carriageway. The signalised junction with

Regents Park Road at which the RSI was conducted comprised of 3 westbound lanes, 1

southbound left turning lane and 1 northbound right turning lane.

Figure 4.1 Location of Millbrook Road (A33) RSI site and Approved Traffic

Management Plan

4.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 4.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 15: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Millbrook Road

Car 16698 86%

LGV 1374 7%

HGV 906 5%

Other 375 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: Millbrook Road

Car 1587 94%

LGV 66 4%HGV 29 2%

Other 7 0%

Number of Interviews: Millbrook Road

4.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 9.5%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 12.2%, IP was 8.8% and the PM peak was 8.9%.

4.1.4 Figure 4.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

4.1.5 Figure 4.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

Figure 4.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Millbrook Road

(A33) MCC

Figure 4.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 16: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

4.1.1 Figure 4.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

4.1.2 The figure indicates that fewer completed interviews for LGVs, HGVs and Other (TfSH)

vehicles were collected than would be anticipated based on the MCC. Postal surveys typically

draw greater responses from the public as opposed to commercial drivers, which make up a

large proportion of LGV and HGV drivers.

4.1.3 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 4.1 below. A reasonable proportion of interviews were captured relative to

very high overall traffic flows and the limitations of issuing postal surveys, resulting in a net

expansion factor of 11.46.

Table 4.1 Millbrook Road (A33) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Millbrook

Road (A33)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 10.8% 8.1% 8.3% 8.7% 9.24 12.39 12.03 11.46

Car 12.2% 8.8% 8.9% 9.5% 8.23 11.38 11.25 10.52

LGV 4.6% 5.4% 3.5% 4.8% 21.76 18.44 28.50 20.82

HGV 3.6% 3.6% 1.3% 3.2% 27.75 27.74 78.50 31.24

Other (TfSH) 4.3% 1.2% 0.8% 1.9% 23.00 82.50 118.00 53.57

Page 17: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 5.1 Location of Regents Park Road RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 5.2 Number of Interviews Completed

1303-5

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Regents Park Road ‐ right turn

5 Regents Park Road – right turn

5.1.1 The RSI survey on the right turning lane of Regents Park Road serves to capture westbound

traffic originating from this route. Regents Park Road is a north south route that links Shirley

High Street to the A33. The road also provides access to the large BAT (British American

Tobacco) facility. The road comprises of sections of 2 single lane carriageways. The signalised

junction with Millbrook Road where the RSI was conducted comprised of 2 lanes, a

westbound right turning lane and southbound/eastbound left hand lane.

5.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 5.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 18: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Regents Park Road ‐ right turn

Car 1576 88%

LGV 169 9%

HGV 31 2%

Other 22 1%

MCC in Interview Direction: Regents Park Road ‐ right turn

Car 327 92%

LGV 20 6%

HGV 4 1%

Other 2 1%

Number of Interviews: Regents Park Road ‐ right turn

5.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 20.7%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 21.9%, IP was 16.7% and the PM peak was 25.1%.

5.1.4 Figure 5.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

5.1.5 Figure 5.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

Figure 5.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Regents Park

Road MCC

Figure 5.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 19: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

5.1.6 Figure 5.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

5.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are periods of particularly high LGV interview samples as compared

to what would be anticipated based on the MCC. This RSI site encompassed relatively low

traffic flows in relation to other RSIs undertaken as part of this study, and so a cluster of LGV

responses for a particular period comprises a larger proportion of the overall responses.

5.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 5.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 5.09. HGVs and Other vehicles were

underrepresented by interview data in periods, but comprise only a small proportion of

overall vehicle movements. The lack of interviews for these modes was as a consequence of

very limited HGV and Other vehicle activity throughout these periods.

Table 5.1 Regents Park Road - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Regents

Park Road

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 21.2% 15.4% 24.5% 19.6% 4.72 6.50 4.08 5.09

Car 21.9% 16.7% 25.1% 20.7% 4.56 5.97 3.98 4.82

LGV 17.3% 8.0% 13.3% 11.8% 5.78 12.43 7.50 8.45

HGV 16.7% 14.3% 0.0% 12.9% 6.00 7.00 No Int 7.75

Other (TfSH) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 9.1% 4.72 6.50 4.08 5.09

Page 20: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 6.1 Location of The Avenue (A33) RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 6.2 Number of Interviews Completed

1308-1

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

The Avenue

6 The Avenue (A33)

6.1.1 The RSI survey on The Avenue was situated on a key access route from central Southampton

to the north. The road connects with M3 junction 14 and M27 junction 4 to the north. The

road comprises of sections of 1 and 2 lane two-way carriageways, stretches of which though

formally marked as single lanes in either direction effectively function as 3-4 lane

carriageways at peak times. The signalised junction with Highfield Lane at which the survey

was conducted comprised of 2 northbound lanes.

6.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a northbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 6.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 21: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

The  Avenue

Car 7231 86%

LGV 659 8%

HGV 301 4%

Other 174 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: The Avenue

Car 401 97%

LGV 13 3%

HGV 2 0%

Other 2 0%

Number of Interviews: The Avenue

6.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 5.5%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 8.8%, IP was 4.4% and the PM peak was 5.1%.

6.1.4 Figure 6.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

6.1.5 Figure 6.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

6.1.6 Figure 6.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

Figure 6.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by The Avenue (A33) MCC

Figure 6.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 22: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

6.1.7 The figure indicates that non-car interviews have been underrepresented in the sample of

interviews relative to observed flows. Postal surveys typically draw greater responses from

the public as opposed to commercial drivers, which make up a large proportion of LGV and

HGV drivers.

6.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 6.1 below. A relatively low proportion of interviews were captured in

relation to overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 20.01. HGVs and Other

vehicles were particularly underrepresented by interview data and so result in larger

expansion factors. The limitations of issuing postal surveys as compared to full interviews are

more apparent at sites such as this where traffic flows are high. However the strategic

importance of the route is such that delays brought about by the substantial traffic

management required to establish an interview bay were unacceptable.

Table 6.1 The Avenue (A33) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

The Avenue

(A33)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average expansion

factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 7.8% 3.8% 4.9% 5.0% 12.87 26.04 20.40 20.01

Car 8.8% 4.4% 5.1% 5.5% 11.41 22.63 19.46 18.03

LGV 4.0% 0.8% 2.7% 2.0% 25.00 124.67 36.67 50.69

HGV 1.1% 0.0% 3.8% 0.7% 90.00 No Int 26.00 150.50

Other (TfSH) 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 30.00 No Int No Int 87.00

Page 23: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 7.1 Location of Highfield Avenue RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 7.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

1308-2

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Highfield Avenue ‐ right turn

7 Highfield Avenue (A3035)

7.1.1 The RSI survey on Highfield Avenue serves to capture northbound traffic joining The Avenue

(A33). The road is a northwest-southeast route that links the Portswood area and the main

University of Southampton campus with the A33. The road comprises of 2 lane carriageway.

The signalised junction with The Avenue where the RSI was conducted comprised of 2 lanes,

of which the left turning lane permitted southbound left turning movements and northbound

right turning movements, while the second right hand lane permitted only northbound

movements.

7.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a northbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 7.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 24: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Highfield Avenue  ‐ right turn

Car 2870 91%

LGV 158 5%

HGV 46 1%

Other 87 3%

MCC in Interview Direction: Highfield Avenue ‐ right turn

Car 597 96%

LGV 22 4%

HGV 2 0%

Other 2 0%

Number of Interviews: Highfield Avenue ‐ right turn

7.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 20.8%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 24.2%, IP was 19.9% and the PM peak was 18.8%.

7.1.4 Figure 7.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

7.1.5 Figure 7.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

Figure 7.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Highfield Avenue

(A3035) MCC

Figure 7.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 25: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

7.1.6 Figure 7.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

7.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are fewer completed interviews for HGV and Other (TfSH) vehicles

than would be anticipated based on the MCC. The Other vehicles subset includes public

service buses, which are not sampled as part of the interview process and consequently

result in a lower proportion of interviews. HGV movements through the site are comparatively

limited, and so in combination with the lower response rate from commercial drivers results

in the absence of completed HGV interviews throughout periods of the survey.

7.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 7.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 5.07. HGVs and Other vehicles were

underrepresented by interview data and so result in larger expansion factors, but comprise

only a small proportion of overall vehicle movements.

Table 7.1 Highfield Avenue (A3035) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and

Average Expansion Factors

Highfield

Avenue

(A3035)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 22.5% 18.9% 18.2% 19.7% 4.44 5.30 5.50 5.07

Car 24.2% 19.9% 18.8% 20.8% 4.13 5.02 5.33 4.81

LGV 13.3% 14.3% 13.8% 13.9% 7.50 7.00 7.25 7.18

HGV 8.3% 0.0% 14.3% 4.3% 12.00 No Int 7.00 23.00

Other (TfSH) 2.6% 3.1% 0.0% 2.3% 39.00 32.00 No Int 43.50

Page 26: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 8.1 Location of Burgess Road (A35) RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 8.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

1309

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Burgess Road ‐ lane 2 only

8 Burgess Road (A35) – right turn

8.1.1 The RSI survey on Burgess Road is situated within close proximity of the main University of

Southampton campus. The road serves as a significant east-west route across the outer

suburbs of the city area, and links Swaythling in the east to Shirley and Millbrook in the west.

The road comprises of 2 westbound lanes and a single eastbound lane. The signalised

junction on which the RSI was conducted comprised of 2 lanes, the left-hand lane permitted

southbound and westbound movements, while the right turning lane permitted westbound

and northbound movements.

8.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 8.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 27: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Burgess Road ‐ lane  2 only

Car 1272 89%

LGV 88 6%

HGV 20 1%

Other 57 4%

MCC in Interview Direction: Burgess Road ‐ lane 2 only

Car 365 97%

LGV 9 2%

HGV 0 0%

Other 4 1%

Number of Interviews: Burgess Road ‐ lane 2 only

8.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 28.7%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 50.0%, IP was 16.9% and the PM peak was 29.5%.

8.1.4 Figure 8.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

8.1.5 Figure 8.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

8.1.6 Figure 8.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

8.1.7 The figure indicates that non-car interviews have been underrepresented in the sample of

interviews relative to observed flows. Postal surveys typically draw greater responses from

Figure 8.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Burgess Road (A35) MCC

Figure 8.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 28: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

the public as opposed to commercial drivers, which make up a large proportion of LGV and

HGV drivers.

8.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 8.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 3.8. HGVs and Other vehicles were

underrepresented by interview data and so result in larger expansion factors, but comprise

only a small proportion of overall vehicle movements. A lack of HGV interviews throughout

the surveys is as a consequence of the relatively low flows in combination with the limitations

of postal surveys.

Table 8.1 Burgess Road (A35) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Burgess

Road (A35)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 44.5% 15.6% 28.0% 26.3% 2.25 6.42 3.58 3.80

Car 50.0% 16.9% 29.5% 28.7% 2.00 5.92 3.39 3.48

LGV 8.7% 6.5% 21.1% 10.2% 11.50 15.33 4.75 9.78

HGV 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% No Int No Int No Int No Int

Other (TfSH) 9.5% 8.0% 0.0% 7.0% 10.50 12.50 No Int 14.25

Page 29: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 9.1 Location of Bassett Green Road RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 9.2 Number of Interviews Completed

1310

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Bassetts Green Road

9 Bassett Green Road (A27)

9.1.1 The RSI survey on Bassett Green Road serves a predominantly residential areas, connecting

Swaythling in the east with Basset in the west of the outer Southampton suburbs. The route

runs parallel to the M27 and links into junctions 4 and 5. The road is wide in sections and

comprises a single lane in both directions. The section on which the RSI was conducted

comprised of 2 lanes and wide central hatched area.

9.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established. Figure 9.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 30: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Automatic Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Bassetts Green Road

Car 4736 89%

LGV 373 7%

HGV 79 1%

Other 139 3%

MCC in Interview Direction: Bassetts Green Road

Car 1034 97%

LGV 29 3%

HGV 4 0%

Other 1 0%

Number of Interviews: Bassetts Green Road

9.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 21.8%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 17.0%, IP was 27.2% and the PM peak was 20.1%.

9.1.4 Figure 9.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. This data is

assessed alongside averaged ATC data, recorded over a period of 2 weeks from a location

within a reasonable proximity to the RSI/MCC site.

9.1.5 This assessment highlights possible anomalies in traffic flows encountered on the day of the

RSI, which may either be as a consequence of a road traffic accident, roadworks, or an event.

Alternatively anomalies may occur because of the presence of the RSI itself, often through

‘site avoidance’. In this instance traffic flows recorded by the MCC correspond closely in both

directions with the ATC data.

9.1.6 Figure 9.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as recorded

by the MCC.

Figure 9.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Bassett Green Road (A27) MCC

Figure 9.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 31: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

9.1.7 Figure 9.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

9.1.8 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are fewer completed interviews for non-car vehicles than would be

anticipated based on the MCC. HGVs can be problematic to interview as they often struggle

to manoeuvre into the interview bay, particularly with larger vehicles or at more constrained

sites.

9.1.9 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 9.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 4.99. Other vehicles were

particularly underrepresented by interview data, with no responses obtained within the AM

and IP periods, and so resulting in larger expansion factors across the day.

Table 9.1 Bassett Green Road (A27) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and

Average Expansion Factors

Bassett

Green Road

(A27)

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 15.3% 24.7% 19.3% 20.0% 6.52 4.05 5.18 4.99

Car 17.0% 27.2% 20.1% 21.8% 5.88 3.68 4.97 4.58

LGV 6.4% 6.8% 13.2% 7.8% 15.70 14.80 7.56 12.86

HGV 3.6% 2.4% 20.0% 5.1% 28.00 41.00 5.00 19.75

Other (TfSH) 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.7% No Int No Int 39.00 139.00

Page 32: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 10.1 Location of Stoneham Way RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 10.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

1311

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Stoneham Way at junction with Bassett Green Road

10 Stoneham Way (A335)

10.1.1 The RSI survey on Stoneham Way is situated on a key access route from central

Southampton to the north. The link connects the A33 in Southampton to Eastleigh, as well as

Southampton Airport Parkway and junction 5 of the M27. The road comprises of sections of 2

lane dual carriageways. The signalised junction at which the RSI was conducted comprised of

2 southbound lanes and 1 westbound right turning lane.

10.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 10.2 reports the number

of interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 33: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Stoneham Way at junction with Bassett Green Road

Car 11077 85%

LGV 1178 9%

HGV 532 4%

Other 250 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: Stoneham Way at junction with Bassett Green Road

Car 860 94%

LGV 48 5%

HGV 12 1%

Other 0 0%

Number of Interviews: Stoneham Way at junction with Bassett Green Road

10.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 7.8%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 9.6%, IP was 6.4% and the PM peak was 7.5%.

10.1.4 Figure 10.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

10.1.5 Figure 10.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

Figure 10.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Stoneham Way MCC

Figure 10.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 34: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

10.1.6 Figure 10.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

10.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows, particularly as the site was a postal only site. There are fewer completed

interviews for HGV and Other (TfSH) vehicles than would be anticipated based on the MCC.

Postal surveys typically draw greater responses from the public as opposed to commercial

drivers, which make up a large proportion of LGV and HGV drivers.

10.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 10.1 below. A reasonable proportion of interviews were captured relative

to very high overall traffic flows and the limitations of issuing postal surveys, resulting in a

net expansion factor of 14.17.

Table 10.1 Stoneham Way (A335) - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and

Average Expansion Factors

Stoneham

Way (A335)

Percentage of Vehicles

Interviewed

Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 8.6% 5.8% 7.0% 7.1% 11.61 17.23 14.27 14.17

Car 9.6% 6.4% 7.5% 7.8% 10.37 15.61 13.42 12.88

LGV 3.7% 4.2% 4.5% 4.1% 27.00 24.00 22.10 24.54

HGV 3.3% 1.7% 2.1% 2.3% 30.67 60.00 48.00 44.33

Other (TfSH) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% No Int No Int No Int No Int

Page 35: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 11.1 Location of Charles Watts Way RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 11.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

1401

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Charles Watts Way

11 Charles Watts Way (A334)

11.1.1 The RSI survey on Charles Watts Way was situated on a significant eastbound link connecting

central Southampton to Bitterne and Hedge End east of the River Itchen. The road provides

access to a large retail park area in Hedge End via junction 7 of the M27. The road comprises

of single lanes in either directions throughout. The approach to the signalised junction with

the M27 on which the RSI was conducted comprised of 3 lanes.

11.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 11.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 36: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Automatic Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Charles Watts Way

Car 8688 87%

LGV 842 8%

HGV 269 3%

Other 203 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: Charles Watts Way

Car 1200 95%

LGV 65 5%HGV 4 0%

Other 5 0%

Number of Interviews: Charles Watts Way

11.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 13.8%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 18.7%, IP was 13.5% and the PM peak was 10.2%.

11.1.4 Figure 11.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

11.1.5 Figure 11.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

11.1.6 Figure 11.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

Figure 11.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Charles Watts Way

MCC

Figure 11.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 37: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

11.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are fewer completed interviews for HGV and Other (TfSH) vehicles

than would be anticipated based on the MCC.

11.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 11.1 below. A reasonably high proportion of interviews were captured

relative to overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 7.85. HGVs and Other

vehicles were underrepresented by interview data and so result in larger expansion factors,

but comprise only a small proportion of overall vehicle movements. A lack of HGV interviews

throughout the PM peak period was as a consequence of very limited HGV activity.

Table 11.1 Charles Watts Way - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Charles Watts

Way

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 17.2% 12.3% 9.5% 12.7% 5.81 8.13 10.54 7.85

Car 18.7% 13.5% 10.2% 13.8% 5.34 7.42 9.78 7.24

LGV 11.4% 7.1% 4.5% 7.7% 8.75 14.18 22.22 12.95

HGV 2.5% 1.3% 0.0% 1.5% 39.50 77.50 No Int 67.25

Other (TfSH) 3.9% 3.3% 0.0% 2.5% 25.50 30.67 No Int 40.60

Page 38: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 12.1 Location of West End Road RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 12.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

1403

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

West End Road

12 West End Road

12.1.1 The RSI survey on West End Road is situated on a route that runs parallel to the M27 and

junctions 7 and 8, as well as providing onward linkages to Bursledon and Locks Heath. The

road comprises of single lanes running northbound and southbound.

12.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and stop/go interview bay to be established. Figure 12.2 reports the

number of interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC,

which provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 39: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Automatic Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

West End Road

ar 4334 89%

LGV 323 7%

HGV 53 1%

Other 127 3%

MCC in Interview Direction: West End Road

Car 1204 92%

LGV 72 6%

HGV 11 1%

Other 12 1%

Number of Interviews: West End Road

12.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 27.8%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 28.1%, IP was 32.8% and the PM peak was 21.1%.

12.1.4 Figure 12.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

12.1.5 Figure 12.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

Figure 12.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by West End Road MCC

Figure 12.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 40: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

12.1.6 Figure 12.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

12.1.7 The figures indicate that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows.

12.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 12.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 3.72.

Table 12.1 West End Road - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

West End

Road

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 27.8% 31.5% 20.0% 26.9% 3.60 3.17 5.00 3.72

Car 28.1% 32.8% 21.1% 27.8% 3.56 3.05 4.74 3.60

LGV 27.8% 23.9% 11.0% 22.3% 3.60 4.18 9.13 4.49

HGV 41.2% 7.4% 22.2% 20.8% 2.43 13.50 4.50 4.82

Other (TfSH) 12.5% 16.2% 2.0% 9.4% 8.00 6.17 50.00 10.58

Page 41: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 13.1 Location of Providence Hill RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 13.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

1404

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Providence Hill

13 Providence Hill

13.1.1 The RSI survey on Providence Hill is situated on a route that runs parallel to the M27

between junction 8 and on to the junction with Botley Road (A3051) to the east, as well as

providing onward linkages to Bursledon and Locks Heath. An inbound only access to a large

supermarket is provided in close proximity to the RSI site. The road comprises of single lanes

running northwest and southeastbound.

13.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was sufficient to enable a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established. Figure 13.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 42: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Automatic  Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Providence  Hill

Car 3676 83%

LGV 421 10%

HGV 143 3%

Other 176 4%

MCC in Interview Direction: Providence Hill

Car 1033 86%

LGV 111 9%

HGV 38 3%

Other 25 2%

Number of Interviews: Providence Hill

13.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 28.1%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 22.9%, IP was 32.0% and the PM peak was 28.3%.

13.1.4 Figure 13.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

13.1.5 Figure 13.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

Figure 13.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Providence Hill MCC

Figure 13.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 43: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

13.1.6 Figure 13.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

13.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows. There are slightly fewer completed interviews for LGVs than would be

anticipated based on the MCC.

13.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 13.1 below. A high proportion of interviews were captured relative to

overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 3.66.

Table 13.1 Providence Hill - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Providence

Hill

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 23.0% 30.3% 27.7% 27.3% 4.35 3.30 3.60 3.66

Car 22.9% 32.0% 28.3% 28.1% 4.36 3.12 3.54 3.56

LGV 30.5% 23.4% 28.6% 26.4% 3.28 4.27 3.50 3.79

HGV 22.5% 28.4% 26.7% 26.6% 4.44 3.52 3.75 3.76

Other (TfSH) 13.2% 12.1% 18.0% 14.2% 7.56 8.29 5.56 7.04

Page 44: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 14.1 Location of Hamble Lane RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 14.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

1405

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Hamble Lane

14 Hamble Lane

14.1.1 The RSI survey on Hamble Lane is situated on a route that runs north-south from junction 8

of the M27 to Hamble. The main access to a large supermarket is provided in close proximity

to the RSI site. The road comprises of single lanes throughout, while the signalised

roundabout at which the RSI was conducted comprised of 3 northbound lanes.

14.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a westbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 14.2 reports the number

of interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 45: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Automatic Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Hamble  Lane

Car 10606 89%

LGV 846 7%

HGV 350 3%

Other 148 1%

MCC in Interview Direction: Hamble Lane

Car 1387 95%

LGV 53 4%HGV 17 1%

Other 4 0%

Number of Interviews: Hamble Lane

14.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 13.1%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 16.2%, IP was 11.8% and the PM peak was 12.3%.

14.1.4 Figure 14.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

14.1.5 Figure 14.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

Figure 14.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Hamble Lane MCC

Figure 14.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 46: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

14.1.6 Figure 14.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

14.1.7 The figure indicates that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows, particularly as the site was a postal only site. There are fewer completed

interviews for LGVs, HGVs and Other (TfSH) vehicles than would be anticipated based on the

MCC. Postal surveys typically draw greater responses from the public as opposed to

commercial drivers, which make up a large proportion of LGV and HGV drivers.

14.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 14.1 below. A reasonable proportion of interviews were captured relative

to overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 8.18.

Table 14.1 Hamble Lane - Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Hamble Lane Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 14.9% 11.0% 11.8% 12.2% 6.69 9.10 8.50 8.18

Car 16.2% 11.8% 12.3% 13.1% 6.18 8.47 8.11 7.65

LGV 6.5% 5.6% 7.9% 6.3% 15.31 17.96 12.67 15.96

HGV 5.7% 4.8% 3.6% 4.9% 17.67 21.00 27.50 20.59

Other (TfSH) 5.1% 3.3% 0.0% 2.7% 19.50 30.00 No Int 37.00

Page 47: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

Figure 15.1 Location of Bursledon Road RSI site and Approved Traffic Management Plan

Figure 15.2 Number of Interviews Completed

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

Interview

Postal

RSI Sampling Method

1406

© OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 18300%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Number of Interviews (All Vehicles)

Manual Classified Count (AllVehicles)Percentage of vehicles interviewed

Burlesdon Road

15 Bursledon Road (A3024)

15.1.1 The RSI survey on Bursledon Road is situated on a key access route from central

Southampton to the east. The road passes through the residential areas of Thornhill and

Bitterne and their local centres, before accessing Southampton via Northam Bridge. The road

comprises of 2 lanes of varying width. The signalised junction with the roundabout on which

the RSI was conducted comprised of 3 lanes.

15.1.2 The RSI survey sampled a proportion of vehicles travelling in a eastbound direction through

the site. The carriageway width and configuration was unsuitable for a temporary traffic

management layout and interview bay to be established, so postal questionnaires were

distributed during the red phase at the signalised junction. Figure 15.2 reports the number of

interviews completed at the site relative to the traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

provides an indication of the sample rate achieved by the RSI.

Page 48: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830

Forward Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Reverse Manual  Class i fied Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Forward Automatic  Traffic  Count (Al l  Vehicles )

Reverse Automatic Traffic Count (Al l  Vehicles)

Burlesdon Road

Car 8327 85%

LGV 823 8%

HGV 450 5%

Other 193 2%

MCC in Interview Direction: Burlesdon Road

Car 1008 93%

LGV 67 6%

HGV 8 1%

Other 0 0%

Number of Interviews: Burlesdon Road

15.1.3 In this instance the overall sample of interviews relative to net traffic flow was 12.1%, where

the AM peak sample rate was 14.9%, IP was 11.0% and the PM peak was 11.3%.

15.1.4 Figure 15.3 below serves to highlight fluctuations in traffic flow recorded by the MCC, which

was undertaken in conjunction with the RSI survey and at the same location. There was no

available ATC data against which the MCC data could be validated.

15.1.5 Figure 15.4 below shows the modal share of traffic passing through the survey site as

recorded by the MCC.

Figure 15.4 Composition of traffic flow and interviews recorded by Bursledon Road MCC

Figure 15.3 Comparison of MCC and ATC by direction of travel

Page 49: Report on Surveys: Appendices A and B 770kb

15.1.6 Figure 15.4 reports the percentage of interviews completed by mode; this enables a

comparison to be drawn between the proportion of vehicles recorded by mode and the

composition of the interviews.

15.1.7 The figures indicate that a broadly comparable set of interviews have been captured relative

to observed flows, particularly as the site was a postal only site. There are fewer completed

interviews for HGVs and Other (TfSH) vehicles than would be anticipated based on the MCC.

Postal surveys typically draw greater responses from the public as opposed to commercial

drivers, which make up a large proportion of HGV drivers.

15.1.8 The expansion factors derived through applying the interview data obtained from this site are

presented in Table 15.1 below. A reasonable proportion of interviews were captured relative

to overall traffic flow, resulting in a net expansion factor of 9.04.

Table 15.1 Bursledon Road – Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed and Average

Expansion Factors

Bursledon

Road

Percentage of Vehicles Interviewed Ratio of Count to Vehicles (average

expansion factor)

AM IP PM Overall AM IP PM Overall

All 13.7% 9.8% 10.6% 11.1% 7.31 10.23 9.44 9.04

Car 14.9% 11.0% 11.3% 12.1% 6.72 9.12 8.82 8.26

LGV 11.2% 6.6% 6.1% 8.1% 8.94 15.17 16.40 12.28

HGV 3.3% 1.4% 0.0% 1.8% 30.25 70.75 No Int 56.25

Other (TfSH) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% No Int No Int No Int No Int