report vhsc monitoring (may 2010 – march 2012)sihfwrajasthan.com/vhsc consolidated report.pdf ·...

Report

VHSC Monitoring

(May 2010 – March 2012)

For

NRHM

By

State Institute of Health and Family Welfare, Jaipur

S

Inbea fo

T

P(1(7

B

T

Ppa

Squcom

*A20

Summary

n the state, been trained obacklog of 3

or the training

he distribution

RI members 13.3%), NGO7.5%), other m

y and large fe

he OBC pres

articipants grarticipation w

omehow the uestion the Voncerned NG

meager 11.7%

As per the o011.

34,0

36,0

38,0

40,0

42,0

44,0

by the end ofout of total 4348157 (14.9%.

n of participan

– 25431 (11O Members - members- 887

emales predo

ence was we

roups predomwas from the a

groups had VHSC memb

GO. The partic% in general, th

rder from MD

Figure 1

000

000

000

000

000

000

No.

f March, 201440 VHSCs.) members y

nts (total 217

1.7%), ANM’s4995 (2.3%)

748 (40.8%)

ominated in th

ell palpable.

minantly had age group of 2

ascendant per list prepar

cipation of elehe pattern be

D NRHM, No

1: Total number

. Of VHSC's tra

37,50(86.3%

2, 4991 batcA total of 217et to be train

344 members

s- 15095 (6.9), MSS memb

he trainings.

their educati25-45 years.

presence of “red by DPMUected PRI memeing replicated

o trainings we

r of VHSC's train

ained T

09%)

SIHFW

ches covering7344 (85.1%)ed out of a to

s trained) is a

9%), AWW’s-bers - 5756

ion between

“Other MembU/BPMU and mbers who ud in almost al

ere conducte

ned May, 2010‐ M

Total VHSC's to

W: an ISO:9001:

g 37509 (86.3) members wotal of 25550

as follows:

32129 (14.8(2.6%), SHG

5-10th standa

bers” giving convieniently

ltimately woul the districts.

ed in the mon

March, 2012

o be trained

43,440

:2008certified ins

3%) VHSC’s ere trained le1 members in

8%), ASHA -2G members- 1

ard and max

enough reasy accepted bld have a say

nth of July-A

stitution

1

have eaving nvited

28853 16337

ximum

son to by the y, was

August

P

*Aasst

Figure

Percentage comtrainin

>

71

51

50 oAs per the reps 101.1% (Tartates the achie

2: Category wis

Percentmpletion of VHngs (%) >80

1-80

1-70

or less ports sent by Jgeted VHSC: evement of 10

40

se percentage of

tage wise disSC

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.1.2.1.2.1.

Jalore, Nodal 840; VHSC co

02.0 % (Target

2

7.50%

0.80%

f participants w

stribution of Districts

Ajmer Baran Churu Dungarpur Jhalawar Kota Sirohi Bharatpur Bundi

Jhunjhunu Jaisalmer Jalore* Sawai Madho Tonk Karauli Jaipur Bhilwara Jodhpur Rajsamand Bikaner Pali Chittorgarh* Pratapgarh Nagaur Hanumagarh Ganganagar Sikar

Dausa Barmer Alwar Dholpur Udaipur

NGO for VAAompleted: 849ted VHSC: 156

11.70%

1

2.3%2.60%

SIHFW

ho were trained

Districts and

opur

ATSALYA, the ).Like wise ch

64 VHSC comp

6.90%

14.80%

13.30%

W: an ISO:9001:

d (May, 2010‐ M

d their Noda

R

VA

SU

VACECCEC

ECAT-VI

MSSSUR

U

current achiehitttorgarh, thepleted: 1596)

%

:2008certified ins

March, 2012)

l NGOs NGO

RCDSSS GVT BCT BCT IIRD

RVHA AATSALYA

LUPIN RVHA

SRKPS URMUL

AATSALYA COEDECON COEDECON - BODHGRAMSHAKHA

S, RCDSSS RE, URMUL

RVHA MVSS ACF

CUTS CUTS RMKM URMUL MDVS BCT

MSGD SURE HPPI

LUPIN JJVS

evement was se report from

PRI

ANM

AWW

AS

NGO

MSS

SHG

Others

stitution

2

stated CUTS

SIHFW: an ISO:9001:2008certified institution

3

Distribution of districts according to No. of VHSCs and members trained (May, 2010- March, 2012) (At Places the percentage does not add upto 100 % because initially the NGO’s were not

maintaining seggeragated data base) District No. of

Blocks NGO No. of

Batches No. of VHSCs

Trained Actual No. members

Trained

Ajmer 8 RCDSSS 151 1049(92.1%)N=1139 7053(88.2%)N= 7999

Alwar 14 HPPI 160 1114(51.9%)N= 2145 6869(81.9%)N=8385

Banswara 8 VAAGDHARA 258 1473(98.9%)N=1489 10529(83.3%)N= 12647

Baran 7 GVT 143 1052(93.4%)N=1126 6767(90.8%)N= 7451

Barmer 8 SURE 174 1633(70.7%)N=2311 7822(75.5%)N=10360

Bharatpur 9 LUPIN 195 1451(99.8%)N=1454 9353(95.8%)N=9768

Bhilwara 11 MSS 187 1574(87.7%)N=1794 8334(79.5%)N=10479

Bikaner 5 MVSS 134 881(100.0%)N= 881 6249(90.5%)N=6903

Bundi 4 RVHA 129 883(99.8%)N=885 5760(93.2%)N=6181

Churu 6 BCT 125 881(99.2%)N=888 5074(84.2%)N=6024

Dausa 5 MSGD 110 769(72.3%)N=1064 4665(86.7%)N=5383

Dholpur 4 LUPIN 80 562(70.3%)N=799 3768(83.8%)N=4495

Dungarpur 5 BCT 126 859(95.4%)N=900 5553(87.4%)N=6354

Ganganagar 7 MDVS 258 2678(98.0%)N=2733 11814(88.7%)N=13314

Hanumangarh 3 URMUL 157 1775 (100.0%)N=1775 7350(93.1%)N=7896

Jaipur 13 VISHAKHA 286 1947 (90.1%)N=2161 12063(79.7%)N=15131

Jaisalmer 3 URMUL 81 680(100.0%)N=680 3736(87.2%)N=4279

Jalore 7 VAATSALYA 121 849(101.1%)N=840 5573(91.9%)N=6066

Jhalawar 6 IIRD 214 1492(100.0%)N=1492 9797(93.8%)N=10444

Jhunjhunu 8 SRKPS 131 1001(100.0%)N=1001 5855(91.3%)N=6413

Jodhpur 9 SURE 240 1588(83.1%)N=1912 10374(88.4%)N=11739

Karauli 5 ECAT 88 715(80.5%)N=888 3690(68.8%)N=5360

Kota 5 RVHA 116 802(98.6%)N=813 5141(92.4%)N=5565

Nagaur 11 RMKM 204 1565(93.4%)N=1676 8843(77.6%)N=11392

Pali 10 ACF 129 888(84.7%)N=1049 5810(86.4%)N=6727

Rajasamand 7 RVHA 153 958(98.9%)N=969 4878(78.2%)N=6240

Sawai Madhopur 5 CECOEDECON 100 727(96.4%)N=754 4684(92.0%)N=5089

Sikar 8 BCT 136 1229(98.1%)N=1253 5479(82.8%)N=6621

Sirohi 5 VAATSALYA 74 519(98.7%)N=526 3488(95.5%)N=3677

Tonk 6 CECOEDECON 151 1074(99.4%)N=1080 6062(80.7%)N=7512

Udaipur 11 JJVS 47 458(18.6%)N=2465 1853(64.1%)N=2893

Chittorgrah 11 CUTS 199 1596(102.0%)N=1564 8220(76.5%)N=10749

Pratapgarh 5 CUTS 108 787(84.3%)N=934 4838(81.1%)N=5965

Rajasthan 4991 37509(86.3%)N=43440 217344(85.1%)N=255501 • Udaipur , Chittorgarh and Pratapgarh were assigned to NGOs only in December, 2010

• Alwar , Bhilwara and Rajsamand started late


4

Category wise distribution of participants of VHSC trainings (May, 2010- March, 2012)

District NGO

Actual Participants

(N) Category of participants

PRI ANM AWW ASHA NGO MSS SHG Others

Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 779

(11.0%) 384

(5.4%) 1226

(17.4%) 790

(11.2%) 168

(2.4%) 169

(2.4%) 1226

(17.4%) 2311

(32.8%)

Alwar HPPI 6869 805

(11.7%) 470

(6.8%) 101

(17.5%) 1152

(16.8%) 60

(0.9%) 88

(1.3%) 423

(6.2%) 2670

(38.9%)

Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529

1124 (10.7%)

488 (4.6 %)

1440 (13.7%)

1482 (14.1%)

11 (0.1%)

12 (0.1%)

24 (0.2%)

5948 (56.5%)

Baran GVT 6767 628

(9.3%) 386

(5.7%) 849

(12.5%) 884

(13.1%) 681

(10.1%) 0

(0.0%) 769

(11.4%) 2570

(38.0%)

Barmer SURE 7822 903

(11.5%) 788

(10.1%) 1308

(16.7%) 896

(11.5%) 254

(3.2%) 517

(6.6%) 726

(9.3%) 2430

(31.1%)

Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 1468

(15.7%) 532

(5.7%) 1167

(12.5%) 1267

(13.5%) 188

(2.0%) 246

(2.6%) 396

(4.2%) 4089

(43.7%)

Bhilwara MSS 8334 906

(10.9%) 537

(6.4%) 1301

(15.6%) 1085

(13.0%) 389

(4.7%) 8

(0.1%) 783

(9.4%) 3325

(39.9%)

Bikaner MVSS 6249 692

(11.1%) 502

(8.0%) 711

(11.4%) 736

(11.8%) 169

(2.7%) 179

(2.9%) 536

(8.6%) 2724

(43.6%)

Bundi RVHA 5760 716

(12.4%) 264

(4.6%) 734

(12.7%) 660

(11.5%) 7

(0.1%) 19

(0.3%) 62

(1.1%) 3298

(57.3%)

Churu BCT 5074 510

(10.1%) 511

(10.1%) 899

(17.7%) 913

(18.0%) 24

(0.5%) 18 (0.4%)

424 (8.4%)

1775 (35.0%)

Dausa MSGD 4665 638

(13.7%) 219

(4.7%) 619

(13.3%) 709

(15.2%) 143

(3.1%) 48

(1.0%) 370

(7.9%) 1919

(41.4%)

Dholpur LUPIN 3768 551

(14.6%) 286

(7.6%) 519

(13.8%) 572

(15.2%) 32

(0.8%) 54

(1.4%) 57

(1.5%) 1697

(45.0%)

Dungarpur BCT 5553 909

(16.4%) 656

(11.8%) 1053

(19.0%) 1018

(18.3%) 8

(0.1%) 9

(0.2%) 906

(16.3%) 994

(17.9%)

Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1236

(10.5%) 473

(4.0%) 1148

(9.7%) 1043

(8.8%) 190

(1.6%) 142

(1.2%) 1018

(8.6%) 6564

(55.6%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350

893 (12.1%)

386 (5.3%)

669 (9.1%)

654 (8.9%)

688 (9.4%)

309 (4.2%)

610 (8.3%)

3141 (42.7%)

Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063

1126 (9.3%)

642 (5.3%)

2247 (18.6%)

1809 (15.0%)

66 (0.5%)

31 (0.3%)

472 (3.9%)

5670 (47.0%)

Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 648

(17.3%) 283

(7.6%) 428

(11.5%) 295

(7.9%) 211

(5.6%) 558

(15.2%) 806

(21.5%) 507

(13.6%)

Jalore VAATSALYA 5573

706 (12.7%)

620 (11.1%)

1012 (18.2%)

636 (11.4%)

4 (0.1%)

43 (0.8%)

208 (3.7%)

2344 (42.1%)

Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1027

(10.5%) 426

(4.3%) 1034

(10.6%) 1199

(12.2%) 50

(0.5%) 624

(6.4%) 361

(3.7%) 5076

(51.8%)

Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 719

(12.3%) 697

(11.9%) 1021

(17.4%) 1221

(20.9%) 36

(0.6%) 99

(1.7%) 164

(2.8%) 1898

(32.4%)

Jodhpur SURE 10374 919

(8.9%) 812

(7.8%) 1565

(15.1%) 1017

(9.8%) 1002

(9.7%) 865

(8.3%) 1517

(14.6%) 2677

(25.8%)

Karauli ECAT- 3690 490

(13.3%) 336

(9.1%) 773

(20.9%) 724

(19.6%) 23

(0.6%) 296

(8.0%) 30

(0.8%) 1018

(27.6%)

Kota RVHA 5141 554

(10.8%) 242

(4.7%) 653

(12.7%) 565

(11.0%) 70

(1.4%) 179

(3.9%) 249

(4.8%) 2629

(51.1%)

Nagaur RMKM 8843 1054

(11.9%) 902

(10.2%) 1479

(16.7%) 1516

(17.1%) 51

(0.6%) 282

(3.2%) 373

(4.2%) 3186

(36.0%)

Pali ACF 5810 671

(11.5%) 605

(10.4%) 961

(16.5%) 771

(13.3%) 104 (1.8%)

216 (3.7%)

211 (3.6%)

2271 (39.1%)


5

Rajasamand RVHA 4878 728

(14.9%) 277

(5.7%) 803

(16.5%) 705

(14.5%) 14

(0.3%) 92

(1.9%) 139

(2.8%) 2121

(43.5%) Sawai Madhopur

CECOEDECON 4684

531 (11.3%)

322 (6.9%)

654 (14.0%)

559 (11.9%)

24 (0.6%)

23 (0.5%)

829 (17.7%)

1742 (37.2%)

Sikar BCT 5479 633

(11.6%) 492

(9.0%) 889

(16.2%) 948

(17.3%) 20

(0.4%) 11

(0.2%) 314

(5.7%) 2172

(39.6%)

Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488

404 (11.6%)

323 (9.3%)

518 (14.9%)

342

(9.8%) 6

(0.2%) 210

(6.1%) 504

(144%) 1181

(33.9%)

Tonk CECOEDECON 6062

779 (12.9%)

358 (5.9%)

815 (13.4%)

660 (10.9%)

199 (3.3%)

89 (1.5%)

816 (13.5%)

2346 (38.7%)

Udaipur JJVS 1853 226

(12.2%) 167

(9.0%) 343

(18.5%) 277

(14.9%) 22

(1.2%) 69

(3.7%) 64

(3.5%) 685

(37.0%)

Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 891

(10.8%) 457

(5.6%) 1363

(16.6%) 1013

(12.3%) 33

(0.4%) 52

(0.6%) 176

(2.1%) 4235

(51.5%)

Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 567

(11.7%) 252

(5.2%) 727

(15.0%) 735

(15.2%) 48

(1.0%) 199

(4.1%) 775

(16.0%) 1535

(31.7%)

Total 217344 25431

(11.7%) 15095(6.9%)

32129(14.8%)

28853(13.3%)

4995(2.3%)

5756 (2.6%)

16337(7.5%)

88748(40.8%)

Age distribution of Participants (May, 2010- March, 2012) District NGO Actual participants

(N) Age

< 25 25-45 >45 Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1005(14.2%) 4753(67.4%) 1295(18.4%)

Alwar HPPI 6869 794(11.6%) 5279 (76.9%) 796 (11.6%)

Banswara* VAAGDHARA 10529 988(9.4%) 7411(70.4%) 706(6.7%)

Baran Gramin Vikas Trust 6767 1272(18.8%) 4654(68.8%) 840(12.4%)

Barmer SURE 7822 1788(22.9%) 4481(57.3%) 1334(17.1%)

Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 1186(12.7%) 6562(70.2%) 1605(17.2%)

Bhilwara MSS 8334 1333(16.0%) 5965(71.6%) 1036(12.4%)

Bikaner MVSS 6249 998(16.0%) 4067(65.1%) 1184(18.9%)

Bundi RVHA 5760 616(10.7%) 4603(79.9%) 541(9.4%)

Churu BCT 5074 753(14.8%) 3396(66.9%) 921 (18.2%)

Dausa MSGD 4665 789(16.6%) 3352(71.9%) 524(11.2%)

Dholpur LUPIN 3768 656(17.4%) 2553(67.8%) 559(14.8%)

Dungarpur BCT 5553 862(15.5%) 4033(72.6%) 658(11.8%)

Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1881(15.9%) 7763(65.7%) 2170(18.4%)

Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 1677(22.8%) 4460(60.7%) 1213(16.5%)

Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1594(13.2%) 8739(72.4%) 1730(14.3%)

Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 415(11.1%) 2719(72.8%) 602(16.1%)

Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 617(11.1%) 4060(72.9%) 896(16.1%)

Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1804(18.4%) 6450(65.8%) 1543(15.7%)

Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 663(11.3%) 4386(74.9%) 806(13.8%)


6

Jodhpur SURE 10374 1674(16.1%) 6757(65.1%) 1943(18.7%)

Karauli ECAT-BODHGRAM 3690 563(15.3%) 2621(71.0%) 506(13.7%)

Kota RVHA 5141 690(13.4%) 3822(74.3%) 629(12.2%) Nagaur RMKM 8843 1138(12.9%) 4251(48.1%) 1152(13.0%)

Pali ACF 5810 756(13.0%) 3966(68.3%) 1088(18.7%)

Rajasamand RVHA 4878 764(15.7%) 3378(69.2%) 736(15.1%)

Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 537(11.5%) 3734(79.7%) 413(8.8%)

Sikar BCT 5479 860(15.7%) 3718(67.9%) 901(16.4%)

Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 510(14.6%) 2386(68.4%) 592(17.0%)

Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 1044(17.2%) 4274(70.5%) 747(12.3%)

Udaipur JJVS 1853 182(9.8%) 1346(72.6%) 325(17.5%)

Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 1163(14.1%) 6100 (74.2%) 957(11.6%)

Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 799(16.5%) 3428(70.9%) 611(12.6%)

TOTAL 217344 32371(14.9%) 149467(68.8%) 31559(14.5%)

Sex distribution of Participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)

District NGO Actual Sex M F

Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1854(26.3%) 5199(73.7%) Alwar HPPI 6869 1452(21.1%) 5417(78.9%) Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 3556(33.8%) 6973(66.2%) Baran GVT 6767 2729(40.3%) 4038(59.7%) Barmer SURE 7822 2527(32.3%) 5295(67.7%) Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 3521(37.6%) 5832(62.4%) Bhilwara MSS 8334 2685(32.2%) 5649(67.8%) Bikaner MVSS 6249 1970(31.5%) 4279(68.5%) Bundi RVHA 5760 2244(39.0%) 3516(61.0%) Churu BCT 5074 1182(23.3%) 3892(76.7%) Dausa MSGD 4665 1679(36.0%) 2986(64.0%) Dholpur LUPIN 3768 1401(37.2%) 2367(62.8%) Dungarpur BCT 5553 1101(19.8%) 4452(80.2%) Ganganagar MDVS 11814 4608(39.0%) 7206(61.0%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 3132(42.6%) 4218(57.4%) Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 2707(22.4%) 9356(77.6%) Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 1288(34.5%) 2448(65.5%) Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 1774(31.8%) 3799(68.2%) Jhalawar IIRD 9797 3811(38.9%) 5986(61.1%) Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 842(14.4%) 5013(85.6%) Jodhpur SURE 10374 2568(24.8%) 7806(75.2%) Karauli ECAT‐BODHGRAM 3690 1007(27.3%) 2683(72.7%)


7

Kota RVHA 5141 1792(34.9%) 3349(65.1%) Nagaur RMKM 8843 2037(23.0%) 4775(54.0%) Pali ACF 5810 1737(29.9%) 4073(70.1%) Rajasamand RVHA 4878 1094(22.4%) 3784(77.6%) Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 1079(23.2%) 3605(77.0%) Sikar BCT 5479 1218(22.2%) 4261(77.8%) Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 1032(29.6%) 2456(71.4%) Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 2209(36.4%) 3853(63.6%) Udaipur JJVS 1853 545(29.4%) 1308(70.6%) Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 3327(40.5%) 4893(59.5%) Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 1422(29.4%) 3416(70.6%)

TOTAL 216293 66886 (30.9%) 147378(68.1%)

Caste distribution of participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)

District NGO Actual trained (N)

Category

ST SC OBC Gen Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 188(2.7%) 911(12.9%) 4635(65.7%) 1319(18.7%) Alwar HPPI 6869 412(6.0%) 1756(25.6%) 3462(50.4%) 1239(18.0%) Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 8031(76.3%) 185(1.8%) 343(3.3%) 520(4.9%) Baran GVT 6767 1964(29.0%) 1192(17.6%) 2746(40.6%) 865(12.8%) Barmer SURE 7822 458(5.9%) 1277 (16.3%) 5045(64.5%) 823(10.5%) Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 324(3.5%) 1574(16.8%) 5643(60.3%) 1812(19.4%) Bhilwara MSS 8334 970(11.6%) 1013(12.2%) 4078(48.9%) 2273(27.3%) Bikaner MVSS 6249 26(0.4%) 1662(26.6%) 3173(50.8%) 1388(22.2%) Bundi RVHA 5760 1427(24.8%) 806(14.0%) 2257(39.2%) 1270(22.0%) Churu BCT 5074 58(1.1%) 1091(21.5%) 2758(54.4%) 1167 (23.0%) Dausa MSGD 4665 1428(30.6%) 775(16.6%) 1257(26.9%) 1205(25.8%) Dholpur LUPIN 3768 292(7.7%) 673 (17.9%) 1206(32.0%) 1597(42.4%) Dungarpur BCT 5553 3828(68.9%) 337(6.1%) 605(10.9%) 783(14.1%) Ganganagar MDVS 11814 27(0.2%) 4726(40.0%) 5850(49.5%) 1211(10.3%) Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 13(0.2%) 2315(31.5%) 4235(57.6%) 787(10.7%) Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1351(11.2%) 2177(18.0%) 5018(41.6%) 3517(29.2%) Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 188(5.0%) 669(17.9%) 920(24.6%) 1959(52.4%) Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 418(7.5%) 1313(23.6%) 2882(51.7%) 960(17.2%) Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1298(13.2%) 1298(13.2%) 5389(55.0%) 1812(18.5%) Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 216(3.7%) 1427(24.4%) 3682(62.9%) 530(9.1%) Jodhpur SURE 10374 335(3.2%) 1685(16.2%) 6104(58.8) 2254(21.7 %)

Karauli ECAT 3690

800(21.7%) 522(14.1%) 1177(31.9%) 1191(32.3%) Kota RVHA 5141 968(18.8%) 1029(20.0%) 2405(46.8%) 739(14.4%)

Nagaur RMKM 8843 64(0.7%) 1092(12.3%) 4073(46.1%) 1585 (17.9%)

Pali ACF 5810 436(7.5%) 1263(21.7%) 2857(49.2%) 1254(21.6%)

Rajasamand RVHA 4878 345(7.1%) 603(12.4%) 2351(48.2%) 1579(32.4%)


8

Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684

980(20.9%) 833(17.8%) 1761(37.6%) 1110(23.7%)

Sikar BCT 5479 193(3.5%) 854(15.6%) 3314(60.5%) 1118(20.4%)

Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488

1133(32.5%) 481(13.8%) 1030(29.5%) 844(24.2%) Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 862(14.2%) 865(14.3%) 2918(48.1%) 1417(23.4%)

Udaipur JJVS 1853 964(52.0%) 107(5.8%) 355(19.2%) 427(23.0%)

Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 1205(14.7%) 1123(13.7%) 3675 (44.7%) 2217(27.0%)

Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 3020(62.4%) 335(6.9%) 638(17.3%) 645(13.3%)

TOTAL 217344 34222(15.7%) 37969(17.5%) 98042(45.1%) 43417(20.0%)

Education level of participants (May, 2010- March, 2012)

District NGO Actual trained

(N) Education

IL 1-5th 5-10th 11-12th 12th Ajmer RCDSSS 7053 1527(21.7%) 1477(20.9%) 2822(40.0%) 676(9.6%) 551(7.8%)

Alwar HPPI 6869 621(9.0%) 1148(16.7%) 3619(52.7%) 784(11.4%) 697(10.1%)

Banswara VAAGDHARA 10529 426(4.0%) 3913(37.2%) 3668(34.8%) 746(7.1%) 329(3.1%)

Baran GVT 6767 539(8.0%) 1881 (27.8%) 3019(44.6%) 622(9.2%) 706(10.4%)

Barmer SURE 7822 857(11.0%) 2604(33.3%) 2598 (33.2%) 754(9.5%) 673(8.6%)

Bharatpur LUPIN 9353 638(11.6%) 2046(21.9%) 4562(48.8%) 1139(12.2%) 968(10.3%)

Bhilwara MSS 8334 1199(14.4%) 2041(24.5%) 3438 (41.3%) 93611.2%) 720(8.6%)

Bikaner MVSS 6249 850(13.6%) 2134(34.1%) 2404(38.5%) 438(7.0%) 423(6.8%)

Bundi RVHA 5760 1405(24.4%) 1194(20.7%) 2223(38.6%) 509(8.8%) 429(7.4%)

Churu BCT 5074 297(5.9%) 1364(26.9%) 2210(43.6%) 638(12.6%) 572(11.3%)

Dausa MSGD 4665 315(6.8%) 937(20.1%) 2359(50.6%) 461(9.9%) 593(12.7%)

Dholpur LUPIN 3768 346(9.2%) 882(23.4%) 1549(41.1%) 508(13.5%) 483(12.5%)

Dungarpur BCT 5553 186(3.3%) 1338(24.1%) 2668(48.0%) 848(15.3%) 513(9.2%)

Ganganagar MDVS 11814 1634(13.8%) 3203(27.1%) 4868(41.2%) 1160(9.8%) 949(8.0%)

Hanumangarh URMUL 7350 972(13.2%) 1539(20.9%) 3076(41.9%) 908(12.4%) 855(11.6%)

Jaipur VISHAKHA 12063 1358(11.3%) 2693(22.3%) 5581(46.3%) 1007(8.3%) 1424(11.8%)

Jaisalmer URMUL 3736 786(21.0%) 1172(31.4%) 833(23.6%) 569(15.2%) 348(9.3%)

Jalore VAATSALYA 5573 1760(31.6%) 1064(19.1%) 1824(32.7%) 481(8.6%) 444 (8.0 %)

Jhalawar IIRD 9797 1165(11.9%) 3337(34.1%) 3318(33.9%) 978(10.0%) 999(10.2%)

Jhunjhunu SRKPS 5855 181(3.1%) 841(14.4%) 3099(52.9%) 970(16.6%) 764(13.0%)

Jodhpur SURE 10374 2131(20.6%) 2990(28.8%) 3696(35.6%) 844(8.1%) 713(6.9%)

Karauli ECAT-BODHGRAM 3690 170(4.6%) 869(23.6%) 1827(49.5%) 414(11.2%) 410(11.1%)

Kota RVHA 5141 349(6.8%) 1488(28.9%) 2465(47.9%) 436(8.5%) 403(7.8%)

Nagaur RMKM 8843 791(8.9%) 1319(14.9%) 3084(34.9%) 805(9.1%) 815(9.2%)


9

Pali ACF 5810 481(8.3%) 1400(24.1%) 2570(44.2%) 688(11.8 %) 671 (11.5%)

Rajasamand RVHA 4878 550(11.3%) 1283(26.3%) 2147(44.0%) 510(10.5%) 388(8.0%) Sawai Madhopur CECOEDECON 4684 450(9.6%) 1441(30.8%) 1994(42.6%) 367(7.8%) 432(9.2%)

Sikar BCT 5479 337(6.2%) 1089(19.9%) 2518(46.0%) 729(13.3%) 806(14.7%)

Sirohi VAATSALYA 3488 970(27.8%) 856(24.5%) 1163(33.3%) 291(8.3%) 208(6.0%)

Tonk CECOEDECON 6062 395(6.5%) 1762(29.1%) 2509(41.4%) 608(10.0%) 788(13.0%)

Udaipur JJVS 1853 84(4.5%) 624(33.7%) 798(43.1%) 185(10.0%) 162(8.7%)

Chittorgarh CUTS 8220 786(9.6%) 2134(26.0%) 3705(45.1%) 875(10.6%) 720(8.8%)

Pratapgarh CUTS 4838 538(11.1%) 1530(31.6%) 2082 (43.0%) 406(8.4%) 282(5.8%) TOTAL 217344 25094(11.5%) 55593(25.6%) 90346(41.6%) 22281(10.3%) 20238(9.3%)

The concept of telephonic monitoring was also added to keep an eye on each and every batch being

conducted at the block from the state level through the VHSC training and coordination unit at SIHFW.

All the batches, except those being physically monitored by Team SIHFW were screened telephonically to

gain knowledge of the quality of trainings.

The basic details were seeked through the round of questions to the trainers and few participants chosen

randomly.Noted details are then compiled and sent to consultant, NRHM on monthly basis.


10

Report Introduction As community empowerment approach, the NRHM envisaged to put village health and sanitation committee as incharge for local decentralized planning & monitoring at the village level. With 43,440 VHSCs constituted across the state, it was a humangous task to sensitize the VHSC members towards health issues particularly in relation to their rights and duties

Village Health & Sanitation committee (VHSC) which is the fifth committee (Development Committee) of the Gram Panchayat level, is the key agency for developing Village Health Plan in view of the prevalent problematic health issues and execute pragmatic and prudent solutions in consultation with the stakeholders. Village Health Committees are the first step towards communitization of health care services and for making health as a people's movement.

This committee comprises of Panchayat representatives, ANM, MTW, Anganwadi workers, Teachers, Community health volunteers, ASHA besides representative from SHG, NGO, and MSS etc.

ASHA Sahyogini is the Convener for this Committee. Village Health Committee will facilitate in addressing the health needs of the entire village with the help of health providers and health institutions. VHSCs will play an important role in planning and monitoring of the health care services through community monitoring mechanism.

Composition of the Village Health & Sanitation Committee

To enable the Village Health & Sanitation Committee to reflect the aspirations of the local community especially of the poor households and women, it has been suggested that:

a. At least 50% members on the Village Health & Sanitation Committee should be women. b. Every hamlet within a revenue village must be given due representation on the Village

Health and Sanitation Committee to ensure that the needs of the weaker sections especially Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes are fully reflected in the activities of the committee.

c. A provision of at least 30% representation from the Non-governmental sector. d. Representation to women’s self-help group etc. on these committees etc. will enable the

Committee to undertake women’s health activities more effectively. e. Notwithstanding the above, the overall composition and nomenclature of the Village

Health & Sanitation Committees is left to the State Governments as long as these committees were within the umbrella of PRIs.

VHSC composition:

• Gram Panchayat members • ASHA, AWW, ANM • SHG leader • Village representative of any CBO • User group representative

Number of VHSC constituted in Rajasthan: 43,440


11

Roles and Responsibilities of VHSC members • Awareness Generation • Supervision and Monitoring and Death Audit • Health problems Identification and development of a VHP • Feedback for corrective measures. • Maintenance of Village Health Register and Calendar • Ensuring Visits of MPW, ANM • Management of Untied fund for VHC

Role of Village Health Committee: Activities

a. Create Public Awareness about the essentials of health programs. b. Discuss and develop a Village Health Plan based on an assessment of the village

situation and priorities identified by the village community. c. Analyze key issues and problems related to village level health and nutrition activities,

give feedback on these to relevant functionaries and officials. Present annual health report of the village in the Gram Sabha.

d. Participatory Rapid Assessment: to ascertain the major health problems and health related issues in the village. Estimation of the annual expenditure incurred for management of all the morbidities may also be done. The mapping will also take into account the health resources and the unhealthy influences within village boundaries.

e. Maintenance of a village health register and health information board/calendar: The health register and board put up at the most frequented section of the village will have information about mandated services, along with services actually rendered to all pregnant women, new born and infants, people suffering from chronic diseases etc.

f. Ensure that the ANM and MPW visit the village on the fixed days and perform the stipulated activity; oversee the work of village health and nutrition functionaries like ANM, MPW and AWW.

g. Get a bi-monthly health delivery report from health service providers during their visit to the village.

h. Take into consideration all the problems of the community and the health and nutrition care providers and suggest mechanisms to solve it.

i. Discuss every maternal death or neonatal death that occurs in their village, analyze it and suggest necessary action to prevent such deaths. Get these deaths registered in the Panchayat.

j. Managing the Village health fund. Village Health Fund: Untied Fund An untied fund for VHCs- There is a provision of Rs.10, 000/- as untied funds for each VHSC per year. This untied fund is to be deposited in concerned Subcenters Account which is jointly operated by ANM and Sarpanch. The untied fund is utilized for demand generation for health care services, sanitation drives, emergency health care needs, rewards for exceptional work in health sector, publicity of MCHN days, RCH camps etc. The untied funds are to be used for the community actions for improvement of health status of the community, for any of the following activities: -


12

a. As a revolving fund from which households could draw in times of need to be returned in installments thereafter.

b. For any village level public health activity like cleanliness drive, sanitation drive, school health activities, ICDS, Anganwadi level activities, household surveys etc.

c. In extraordinary case of a destitute women or very poor household, the Village Health & Sanitation Committee untied grants could even be used for health care need of the poor household.

d. The untied grant is a resource for community action at the local level and shall only be used for community activities that involve and benefit more than one household. Nutrition, Education & Sanitation, Environmental Protection, and Public Health Measures shall be key areas where these funds could be utilized.

e. Every village is free to contribute additional grant towards the Village Health & Sanitation Committee. In villages where the community contributes financial resources to the Village Health & Sanitation Committee untied grant of Rs.10, 000/-, additional incentive and financial assistance to the village could be explored. The intention of this untied grant is to enable local action and to ensure that Public Health activities at the village level receive priority attention.

Training of VHSC Capacity building of VHSCs for making them functional in terms of developing the Village Health Plan, monitoring of the health activities and to ensure the access and utilization of services by all villagers is the key objective of the training of VHSC. State has decided to organize the Training of VHSC in a cascading model, the monitoring of which is assigned to SIHFW besides coordinating trainings with the help of SPMU, DPMU and Nodal NGOs. Objectives of Constitution of VHSCs and Capacity Building (Training) of the members

• Communitization of Health Services • To ensure decentralized planning from village level • To ensure the community monitoring. • Promote access to improved health care specially the vulnerable groups. • Capacity building of PRIs

Training of trainers

a. State Level: SIHFW Rajasthan along with CHETNA and NRHM Rajasthan did conducted the sensitization meet for the 31 representatives of selected NGOs who in turn were expected to take up the task to reach with the process and messages to VHSC members across all the villages in Rajasthan that shall empower the community through VHSC to take collective decision on issues pertaining to Health and sanitation specific to a village.

• District Level- 6 selected trainers from each District –(2 from Health department and 4 NGO representatives) were to be trained at SIHFW to impart trainings at the block level as distict level trainers DTT Training Load for 34* 6= 204

• In total a strength of 196 district level trainers were trained. Later in the month of January, 2011 , another set of 16 district level trainers were trained , including the staff of newly selected nodal NGO from Chittorgarh, Pratapgarh and Udaipur were trained. Batch Size 30


13

Batches- 7 at SIHFW 14 man days at SIHFW Time line –Feb- March 2010

b. Block Level – With a collaborative effort, department and concerned NGOs did train 6 trainers per block and a total of 1422 trainers were trained at block level. At District level Training load- 1422 Batch size- 40 1 or 2 batches on the basis of No. of Blocks Training by DPMU 6 trainers per block- 3 NGO, 1 Block ASHA Coordinator, 1 BPM, 1 free lance trainer Time line - March 2010

Training of Village Health Committee Members- The total training load is of approximate. The trainings at grass root level are being conducted by identified NGOs. SIHFW is the monitoring agency and provides supportive supervision.

Training Load: 2, 50,000 members Training Agency: Identified NGO in the district Time Span- One Year Batch Size – Minimum 49 members (7 VHSC in one batch) Total projected batches- 5000 Training Duration: Two Days Minimum attendance- 70% Responsibility of ensuring attendance- NGO and BPMU Venue- Panchayat Bhawan, Dharamshalas, Cost per batch Rs. 27,000/- April 2010- March 2011

Training material

Two Books- Trainers Guide - Reading material for members

• Development by SIHFW,VHAI and CHETNA • Field testing of reading material at Ajmer • Participatory Training Methodology

Printing of Modules

• Facilitators Guide- 5000 copies @ Rs. 45.81/- • Reading material- 1.50 lakh copies @ Rs. 27.77 /- • Printing through SIHFW

Content of training module and reading material • Determinants of Health • Burden of disease on families, community • Causes of diseases • Health institutions, Health Programmes, Service guarantees


14

• Village Health Committees- Constitution, Roles and Responsibilities • Untied Funds for VHCs • Monthly meetings • Development of Village Health Plans • Community Monitoring

Selection of NGOs

1. Advertisement published on 20.1.2009 in two newspapers. 2. Eligibility criteria of the selection of NGOs was finalized with prior approval of NRHM-

a. Registration under Rajasthan Societies Registration Act 1958 or Companies Registration Act or Under Trust

b. At least 10 years working experience in health and especially community level interventions after its registration.

c. Experience of organizing the mass scale training of grass root level Government and Non government functionaries’ like PRIs, AWW, ASHAs, SHGs etc at mass scale (documentary evidence required with proof).

d. Annual Financial Turnover Rs. 50 Lacs excluding the land and building. e. Should have infrastructure for training like training space-hall (desirable but not

essential. However, the NGO should be in position to make provision thereof), LCD, OHP, Vehicle etc and qualified trainers.

f. Should have working experience and linkages with Government departments. Applications received: 100 against the advertisement. Each of the eligible NGO was assessed on scale and status of each applicant and the selection was finalized by the committee for VHSC training.

NGOs and District

S.No. Name and Address of NGO Representative District

1 Maharishi Dayanand Vikas Samiti, Sri Ganganagar 2 Humana People to People India Alwar 3 Shikshit Rojgar Kendra Prabandak Samiti Jhunjhunu 4 URMUL Hanumangarh and Jaisalmer 5 CECOEDECON Sawai Madhopur, Tomk 6 Maru Vikas Evam Shod Sansthan Bikaner 7 Indian Institute of Rural Development Jhalawar 8 Mata Shree Gomti Devi Jan Seva Nidhi Dausa 9 Vatsalya Jalore and Sirohi 10 Society to uplift Rural Economy (SURE) Jodhpur, Barmer 11 VAAGDHARA Banswada 12 Mewar Seva Sansthan Bhilwara 13 Gramin Vikas Trust Baran 14 EACAT-BODHGRAM Karauli 15 Ambuja Cement Foundation Pali 16 RCDSSS Ajmer 17 Rajasthan Mahila Kalyan Mandal Nagaur 18 Rajasthan Voluntary Health Association Kota, Bundi, Rajsamand 19 Bhoruka Charitable Trust Dungarpur, Sikar , Churu


15

20 Lupin Human Welfare and Research Foundation Dholpur, Bharatpur 21 Vishakha Jaipur 22 CUTS Pratapgarh, Chittorgarh 23 Jagran Jan Vikas Smiti Udaipur Co-ordination Unit for VHSC

Coordination unit for VHSC training was established at SIHFW from 1.12.2009. One Consultant VHSC and four ROs are appointed (financial support from NRHM) and each of them has been made responsible for coordinating & monitoring the activities of VHSC training at districts.

Responsibility of Co-ordination Unit

• Coordination of the state level sensitization workshop on VHSC for the NGOs • Coordinating the Zonal level workshop. • Planning and coordinating the state level district training program. • Coordinating the block level training with the help of nodal NGOs • Monitoring of the block level training program. • Development of checklists for monitoring • Monitoring of Trainings at district and block level • Telephonic monitoring of each batch at block level. • Development of reports and documentation • Workshops and seminars

IEC-

The component of VHSC needs to be widely publicized, so that it could be robustly rooted in the institutional framework. The IEC were done through posters prepared and circulated by UNICEF. The issues like health rights, services to be rendered through PHC, CHC and subcenter, roles and responsibilities of committees were addressed through posters.

Objectives The project was taken up by State Institute of Health & family Welfare, Jaipur in the month of December, 2009 with the following objectives.

1. Training planning 2. Develpoment of formats /checklists/ Reading materials 3. Development of Reporting Mechanism 4. Generating the reports , its rnalysis and provision of feedbacks 5. Field level Monitoring, documentation and Evaluation 6. Involved in the development of Village Health Plans 7. Printing and Distribution of Training Modules and Reading Materials

DNTTTBTbltainrem

D

District: AjmeNGO: Roman

otal No.of Blotal VHSC tootal Trained

Batches comphe Trainings locks covered

arget coveringncluded 11.0%epresentative

members of VH

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Percen

tage

of p

articipa

nts

Disrtrict spe

er Catholic Dioc

locks: 8

o be trained:

VHSC: 1049

pleted: 151

in Ajmer Disd under the g 88.2% me% PRI Memes 2.4% membHSC.

10.99%

PRI (n=779) (

ecific Mon

cesan social S

1139

9

stict initiated district. The mbers leavinbers, 5.4% Abers from MS

Figure

5.40%

17.4

ANM n=384)

AW(n=12

itoring Re

Service Socie

in the monthNGO comple

ng 11.8% untANM’s, 17.4%SS,17.4% me

3:Category wise

40%

11.20%

WW 226)

AS (n=790)

Category of Pa

N=705

SIHFWport: Some

ety (RCDSSS

h of May, 20eted 151 battrained. The

% AWW,11.2%mbers from S

e divison of par

2.40% 2

NGO (n=168) (n

articipant

3

W: an ISO:9001:e observat

)

010 simultanetches achieveparticipants

% Asha SahySHG and rest

ticipants

2.40%

17.40

MSS n=169)

SHG(n=122

:2008certified ins

tions

eously in all eing 92.1% owho were tr

yogini’s 2.4% t 32.7% were

0%

32.70%

G 26)

Others (n=2311)

stitution

16

the 8 of the rained NGO other

Mfr

F

Maximum partom age group

emale’s partic

Percen

tage

of p

articpan

ts

ticipation (67.p <25 years a

cipation (73.8

F

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

gp

p

.4%) was recand 18.4% fro

Figure 4

8%) surmount

Figure 5: Distrib

1(n

Male (n=1

26.

Sex dis

corded from aom age group

4: Age distributio

ted male part

bution of particip

14(n=

67.40%(n=475

18.40%n=1295)

N=7053

854)

.30%

stribution of th

N=705

SIHFWage group of 2p >45 years

on of participan

ticipation of on

pants according

4.20%=1005)

%53)

3

Female(n=51

73.7

he participants

3

W: an ISO:9001:25-45 years,

nts

nly 26.3%

g to Sex

199)

70%

s

:2008certified ins

while only 14

<2

25

>4

stitution

17

4.2 %

25

5‐45

45

O

be

M

(2

st

OBC represen

eing the lowe

Most of the pa

20.9%), 7.8%

tandard .Apar

0

20

40

60

80

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

ntation in train

est with 2.7%

articipants (40

who had stu

rt from these

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

ST

nings was 65

attendance.

Figure 6:

0.0%) were e

udied 12th sta

21.7% partici

Figure 7: Leve

(n=188)

2.70%

40.00%

9.60%

5.7% followed

Caste distributi

educated in th

andard while 9

ipants were il

el of Education o

SC (n=911)

12.90%

Caste Of Part

N=7053

21

%

%

7.80%

N=7053

SIHFWd by general

ion of participan

he range of 5

9.6% particip

literate.

of participants

OBC (n=4635

65.70%

ticipants

3

.70%

20.90%

W: an ISO:9001:(18.7 %), SC

nts

5-10th followed

pants fall in th

5) GENERA(n=1319

%

18.

:2008certified ins

C (12.9%) an

d by of 1-5th

he range of 1

AL 9)

70%

Illitrate(n=15

1‐5th(n=1477

5‐10th(n=282

11‐12th(n=67

>12th(n=551

stitution

18

nd ST

grade

1-12th

527)

7)

22)

76)

1)

DNTTTBTof83TS%

F

Nw

District: BanswNGO: VAAGD


Batches comphe NGO, VAAf Banswada d3.3% of the ehe total particahyogini’s, 0

% others.

emale Partici

Note: Data onwas not obtai

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

Percen

tage

Of P

articipa

nts

wara HARA locks: 8 o be trained: VHSC: 1473

pleted: 258 AGDHARA wdistrict .of the expected 1264cipants distrib.1% members

pation of 66.2

Figu

n bifurcation ned for the i

0%

0%

0%

0%

PRI (n=1124)

10.70%

1476 3

was delegatedtotal target ,

47 participantbution is : 10.7s form NGO,0

Figure

2% outsmarte

ure 9: Distributio

of participannitial month

)ANM

(n=488)A

(n=

%4.60%

1

66.20%

d with the res98.9 % was a

ts to be traine7% PRI Mem0.1% membe

e 8: Category w

ed male partic

on of participan

nts based ons from the N

AWW =1440)

AS (n=148

13.70%14.1

Category

N=10

33.80

%

N=10529

SIHFW

ponsibility of achieved. Th

ed leaving a bbers, 4.6% A

ers from MSS

ise divison of pa

cipation (33.8

nts based on Sex

n age group, NGO.

82)NGO (n=11)

10%

0.10%

Of Participant

529

0%

W: an ISO:9001:

organizing trae total partici

backlog of 20.ANMs,13.7% AS 0.2% SHG m

articipants

8%)

x category

caste and le

MSS (n=12)

SH(n=

0.10% 0.

ts

Male (nFemale

:2008certified ins

ainings at 8 bpants trained.1%. AWW, 14.1% members and

evel of educa

HG 24)

Others (n=5948)

.20%

56.50%

n=3556)e(n=6973)

stitution

19

blocks d were

Asha d 56.5

ation

)

%

DNTTTBTtha

AAM

District: Baran

NGO: Gramin


Batches Comhe training in

he end of Martotal of 90.8%

Actual numbeANM’s,12.5% Members and

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

n Vikas Trust

locks: 7

o be trained:

VHSC: 1052

pleted: 143

n Baran Distrirch, 2012,93.4% of the total

er of trained AWWs, 13.138.0% Others

PRI (n=628) (

9.30%

1126

2

ict began in t4% of the totainvited partic

participants 1% Asha Sas; with no me

Figure 10

ANM n=386)

AW(n=8

5.70%

12.

the month of al VHSC (112ipants (7451)

was 6767ahyogini’s, 10embers from M

0: Category wise

WW 849)

AS (n=884)

50%13.10

Category O

N=6

SIHFW

July, 2010 in26) were train) leaving 9.2 %

comprising o0.1 % membMSS .

e divison of part

NGO (n=681)

M

0%

10.10%

Of Participants

767

W: an ISO:9001:

n 2 blocks (Aed completin% backlog ag

of 9.3% PRbers from NG

ticipants

MSS (=0) SH(n=7

0.00%

11.4

:2008certified ins

Anta and Barag 143 batche

gainst the targ

I members, GO, 11.4 %

HG 769)

Others (n=2570

40%

38.00%

stitution

20

an).By es and get.

5.7% SHG

0)

%

Mw

Mm

40pa

Maximum Partwhile participa

More of Femamale’s attende

0.6% participarticipants fro

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

50.

60.

70.

Percen

tage

atten

dance

ticipation wasnts form age

ale Participaned the training

Fig

ants belongeom ST .Only 1

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

<25 Ye

s noticed fromgroup <25 ye

Figure 1

nts marked thgs.

gure 12: Distrib

d to OBC cat12.8% particip

ears (n=1272)

18.80%

Ag

59.7%,

m the age grears and >45

11: Age distribu

heir presence

ution of particip

tegory followepants from Ge

25‐45 Ye(n=465

6

ge groups of P

N=6767

4

N=6767

SIHFWroup of 25-45years were 1

ution of particip

e with 59.7%

pants based on S

ed by 17.6% peneral catego

ears 54)

>45

8.80%

Participants

7

40.3%,

7

W: an ISO:9001:5 years with 8.8% and 12

ants

% attendance

Sex

participants frory were train

5 Years (n=840

12.40%

Males(n

Female

:2008certified ins

68.8% attend.4% respectiv

while only 4

rom SC and 2ed.

0)

n=2729)

s(n= 4038)

stitution

21

dance vely

40.3%

29.0%

44st1

4.6% of the ptandard, 10.41-12th grade,

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

50.Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

participants we% participantwhile only 8.0

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

ST (n

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illiter(n=53

8

Figure 13: C

ere educatedts who had pa0% of the par

Figure 1

n=1964) SC

29.00%

rate 39)

1‐5t(n=18

.00%

27

aste distributio

upto 5-10th gassed12th starticipants wer

14: Level of Edu

C (n=1192)

17.60%

Caste of the p

N=6767

th 881)

5‐10(n=30

7.80%

44

Level Of Ed

N=67

SIHFW

on of participant

grade followedndard and 9.2

re illiterate.

cation of partic

OBC (n=2746)

40.60%

participants

0th 019)

11‐12(n=62

4.60%

9.2

ducation

767

W: an ISO:9001:

ts

d by 27.8% e2% participan

ipants

General (n=865)

12.80

2th 22)

>12(n=70

20% 10.

:2008certified ins

ducated uptonts educated

0%

th 06)

.40%

stitution

22

o 1-5th upto

DNTTTBScopa10m

F

Nw

District: BarmNGO: Society


Batches ComURE compleovered (2311articipants in0.1% ANMs,

members and

emales active

Note: Data onwas obtained

0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

mer for Rural Upllocks: 8 o be trained: VHSC: 1633pleted: 186 ted 186 batc1).The actuavited (1036016.7% AWW31.1 % were

ely participate

n bifurcation from the mo

00%00%00%00%00%00%00%00%

PRI (n=903

11.50

0.00%

50.00%

100.00%

Percen

tage

of p

articpan

ts

iftment (SUR

2311 3

ches by the el number of ) .Out of the

W, 11.5% AS,other membe

Figure 15

ed with a high

Figure

of participanonth of Septe

3)ANM

(n=788) (n

0%10.10%

%

%

%

Male (n

E)

end of March members tr

e total of 782 3.2% NGO ers of VHSC.

5: Category wise

her attendanc

16: Sex distribu

nts based onember from t

AWW n=1308)

AS(n=89

16.70%11.5

Category

N=

n=2527)

32.30%

Sex of the pa

N=7822

SIHFW

2012 coverained were 22 participanmembers, 6.6

e divison of part

e of 67.7% th

ution of particip

n age group, the NGO.

S 96)

NGO (n=254)

50%

3.20%

y Of Participan

=7822

Female (n=52

67.7

rticipants

2

W: an ISO:9001:

ring 70.7% of75.5% of the

nts 11.5% we6% MSS me

ticipants

han the male

pants

caste and le

MSS (n=517)

S(n=

6.60%

9.

nts

295)

70%

:2008certified ins

f total VHSCe total numbere PRI memmbers, 9.3%

(32.3 %)

evel of educa

HG =726)

Others(n=2430

.30%

31.10

stitution

23

to be ber of mbers,

SHG

ation

s 0)

%

DNTTTBT

an

co

pa

le

T

13

m

District: Bhilw

NGO: Mewar S


Batches comphe training at

nother NGO

onducted till

articipants tra

eft untrained.

he total parti

3.0% Asha S

members. Only

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

wara Sewa Sansth

locks: 11

o be trained:

VHSC: 1574

pleted: 187

t Bhilwara sta

(RCDSSS)

March, 2012

ained were 7

cipants traine

Sahyogini’s,

y 0.1 MSS me

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

PRI (n=9.6)

10.90

an (MSS), RC

1794

4

arted towards

was barged

2 completing

79.5% of the

ed can be bi

4.7% memb

ember were r

Figure 17: C

ANM (n=537)

A(n=

0%

6.40%

CDSSS

the end of Au

in the mont

87.7% of th

invited partic

furcated into

ers from NG

registered.

Category wise d

AWW =1301)

AS (n=108

15.60% 13.

Category

N=8334

SIHFW

ugust, 2010.In

th of Decem

he VHSC to

cipants (1047

10.9% PRI’s

GO, 9.4 % S

ivison of partici

85)NGO

(n=389)

00%

4.70%

y Of Participan

4

W: an ISO:9001:

n view of slow

mber, 2010. 1

be trained

9).20.5 %par

s, 6.4% ANM

SHG’s, and 3

pants

MSS (n=8)

S(n=

0.10%

ts

:2008certified ins

w pace of train

187 batches

.Actual numb

rticipants wer

Ms, 15.6% AW

39.9% were

HG =783)

Others(n=3325

9.40%

39.90

stitution

24

nings,

were

ber of

re still

WW’s,

other

s 5)

0%

7be

67

48co

1.6% participelonging to <2

7.8% Female

8.9% of the Oompared to 1

0

20

40

60

80

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pnats belonge25 years of a

e participants

OBC attended2.2% SC and

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<25 Y

ed to the agege while only

Figur

appeared for

Figure 19: Dist

d the training wd 11.6 % ST c

Years (n=1333)

16.00%

A

67.8%,

e group of 2y 12.4 % parti

re 18: Age distti

r the training a

ribution of part

while 27.3% Gcategory.

25‐45 Y(n=596

71

Age groups of

N=8334

3

,

N=8334

SIHFW5-45 years, fcipants were

bution of partic

as compared

icipants based o

General categ

ears 65)

>45

1.60%

f Participants

4

32.2%,

4

W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1in age group

cipants

to 32.2% ma

on Sex

gory participa

5 Years (n=1036

12.40%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

16.0% partici >45 years

le participant

ants appeared

6)

es(n=2685)

ales(n=5649)

stitution

25

ipants

s

d as

24ed8

4.5% of the pducation betw.6% participa

0

10

20

30

40

50Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

participants weween 5-10th snts were edu

F

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

ST

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Illitera(n=119

14.

Figure 20: C

ere educatedstandard, 11.2cated upto 12

igure 21: Educa

(n=970) S

11.60%

ate 99)

1‐5th(n=204

40%

24.

Caste distributio

upto 1-5th gr2% participan2th standard.

tional level of p

SC (n=1013)

12.20%

Caste of the p

N=8334

h 41)

5‐10t(n=34

50%

41

Level Of Ed

N=83

SIHFW

on of participant

rade while a mnts were in 1114.4% partic

participants

OBC (n=4078)

48.90%

participants

4

th 38)

11‐12(n=93

1.30%

11

ducation

334

W: an ISO:9001:

ts

maximum of 4-12th standaripants were il

) General(n=2273

27.3

2th 36)

>12(n=7

1.20%8.

:2008certified ins

41.3% had therd category anllitrate.

l )

0%

2th 20)

.60%

stitution

26

eir nd

DNTTTBIn

20

topa

1

2

65be

District: Bikan

NGO: Maru Vi


Batches Comn Bikaner, the

010.The total

otal VHSC toarticipants (69

1.1% PRI’s, 8

.9% members

5.1 % particielonging to ag

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

ner kas Evam Sh

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 881 pleted: 134 e training was

l number of b

o be trained (903).

8.0% ANMs,

s from MSS, 8

pnats belongge group >45

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

PRI (n=692)

11.10%

hod Sansthan

881

s started sim

batches comp

(881). Actual

11.4% AWW

8.6 % SHG’s

Figure 22

ged to the ag5 years while

ANM (n=502)

AW(n=7

%8.00%

1

multaneously i

leted till Marc

numbers of p

W’s, 11.8% As

, and 43.6% o

2: Category wise

ge group of 2only 16.0% p

WW 711)

AS (n=736)

1.40% 11.80

Category Of

N=6249

SIHFW

n 2 blocks n

ch, 2012 was

participants tr

sha Sahyogin

other membe

e divison of part

25-45 years, articipants we

NGO (n=169)

M(n=

%

2.70%

f Participants

W: an ISO:9001:

amely Nokha

134 complerained were 9

ni’s, 2.7% me

rs were traine

icipants

followed by 1ere in age <2

MSS =179)

SHG (n=536

2.90%

8.60

:2008certified ins

a, Kolayat in

eting 100 % o0.5% of the in

embers from

ed , respectiv

18.9% partici5 years

6)Others (n=2724)

0%

43.60%

stitution

27

June,

of the nvited

NGO,

vely.

ipants

Fpa

Mtr

emales got articipation

Maximum of trainings while

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0Pe

rcen

tage

atten

dance

the upper h

ainees were fthe participa

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

<25 Ye

Figure

hand with 68

Figure 24: Se

from OBC (50tion of SC an

ears (n=998)

16.00%

A

68.5%

23: Age distribu

8.5% particip

ex distribution o

0.8%). 22.2%d ST was lim

25‐45 Y(n=40

6

Age groups of

N=6249

31.

%,

N=6249

SIHFW

ution of particip

pation as co

of participants

% General cateited to 26.6%

Years 67)

>4

5.10%

Participants

5%,

W: an ISO:9001:

ants

ompared to

egory particip% and 0.4 % re

45 Years (n=11

18.90%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

only 31.5%

pants attendedespectively.

184)

%

es(n=1970)

ales(n=4279)

stitution

28

male

d the

3410th

4.1% of the p0th standard,

heir education

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

participants we 7.0% particip

n completed u

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n

0

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=8

13

Figure 25: C

ere educatedpants were edupto 12th stan

Figure 26:

=26) SC

0.40%

C

rate 850)

1‐5(n=21

3.60%

34

Caste distributio

till 5th grade ducated upto dard.13.6% p

Level of Educat

(n=1662) O

26.60%

Caste of the pa

N=62

th 134)

5‐10(n=24

4.10%

3

Level Of Ed

N=6249

SIHFW

on of participant

while 38.5% 11-12th stan

participnats w

ion of participan

OBC (n=3173)

50.80%

articipants

249

0th 404)

11‐12(n=43

38.50%

7.

ducation

9

W: an ISO:9001:

ts

had their edudard and 6.8%

were illetrate.

nts

General (n=1388)

22.2

2th 38)

>12t(n=42

.00% 6

:2008certified ins

ucation betwe% participant

)

0%

th 23)

.80%

stitution

29

en 5- s had

DNTTTBR

co

th

D

S

.

District: Bund

NGO: Rajastha


Batches ComRVHA started

ompleted till M

he invited part

Distribution of

ahyogini’s, 0.

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

i an Voluntary

locks: 4

o be trained:

VHSC: 883

pleted: 129 the VHSC fie

March, 2012 w

ticipants (618

f trained part

.1% NGO, 0.3

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=716)

12.40%

Health Assoc

885

eld level train

were 129 (99

81).

ticipants is 1

3% MSS, 1.1

Figure 27: Cat

ANM (n=264)

AW(n=7

%

4.60%

12

ciation (RVHA

ings in Bund

9.8%). Actual

2.4% PRI’s,

% SHG’s, an

tegory wise divis

WW 734)

AS (n=660)

2.70% 11.50

Category Of

N=5760

SIHFW

A)

i in June, 201

number of pa

4.6% ANMs

nd 57.3% othe

son of participa

NGO (n=7)

M(n

%

0.10%

f Participants

W: an ISO:9001:

10 .The total

articipants tra

s, 12.7% AW

er members.

nts

MSS n=19)

SHG (n=62

0.30% 1.10

:2008certified ins

number of V

ined was 93.2

WW’s, 11.5%

)Others (n=3298)

0%

57.30%

stitution

30

HSCs

2% of

Asha

65fr

6

5.2 % participom age group

1.0% Female

0

20

40

60

80

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pants belongep >45 years w

e participants

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

<25 Y

ed to the agewhile only 10.

Figure

attended the

Figure 29: Sex

Years (n=616)

10.70%

A

61.0%,

e group 25-457% participan

28: Age distribu

training as co

x distribution of

25‐45 Y(n=460

79

Age groups of P

N=576

39

N=5760

SIHFW5 years, follownts who belon

ution of particip

ompared to o

f participants

ears 03)

>4

9.90%

Participants

0

9.0%,

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 9.4 %nged to <25 y

pants

nly 39.0% ma

5 Years (n=541

9.40%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

% participantsyears age gro

ale participan

1)

es(n=2244)

ales(n=3516)

stitution

31

were up

ts

39ca

E(8

9.2% of the Oategory, 14.0

Educational le8.8%) particip

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participa% SC and 24

evel of traineepants; passed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

2

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illiter(n=14

24

ant’s were trai4.8 % ST.

Figure 3

es was 1-5th g 12th standard

Figure

=1427) SC

24.80%

ate 405)

1‐5t(n=11

4.40%20

ned till March

30: Caste distribu

grade (20.7%)d (7.4%). 24.4

31: Level of Edu

C (n=806)

14.00%

Caste of the p

N=5760

th 194)

5‐10(n=22

0.70%

38

Level of Ed

N=576

SIHFWh, 2011, 22.0%

ution of particip

) 5-10th stand4% participna

ucation of partic

OBC (n=2257

39.20

participants

0th 223)

11‐12(n=50

8.60%

8

ducation

0

W: an ISO:9001:% belonged to

pants

dard (38.6%),ats were illetra

cipants

7) Gener(n=127

%

22

2th 09)

>12(n=4

8.80% 7

:2008certified ins

o General

, 11-12th stanate.

ral 70)

2.00%

th 29)

7.40%

stitution

32

ndard

DNTTTBV

ag

of

T

fr

66wag

District: Churu

NGO: Borukha


Batches compVHSC training

gainst the set

f participants

here were 10

om NGO, 0.4

6.9 % particiwere in the ag

ge.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

u a Charitable T

locks: 6

o be trained:

VHSC: 881 pleted: 125

gs were initiat

t target of 88

trained were

0.1% PRI’s, 1

4% members

pants belongge group >45

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=510)

10.10%

Trust

888

ted in churu d

8 (99.2%) at

84.2% of the

0.1% ANMs,

from MSS, 8.

Figure 3

ed to the ag5 years while

ANM (n=511)

AW(n=8

% 10.10%

17

district in Jun

6 blocks of c

e invited partic

17.7% AWW

.4 % SHG’s, a

32: Category wis

e group of 25only 14.8 %

WW 899)

AS (n=913)

7.70%18.00%

Category Of

N=5

SIHFW

ne, 2010. In t

churu coverin

cipants (5074

W’s, 18.0% As

and 35.0% ot

se divison of par

5-45 years, f% participnats

NGO (n=24)

M(n

%

0.50%

f Participants

5074

W: an ISO:9001:

total, 881 VH

g 125 batche

4).

sha Sahyogin

ther members

rticipants

followed by 1who belonge

MSS n=18)

SHG (n=424

0.40%

8.40

:2008certified ins

HSC’s were tr

es. Actual num

i’s, 0.5% mem

s.

8.2 % particied to <25 yea

4)Others (n=1775)

0%

35.00%

stitution

33

rained

mbers

mbers

ipants ars of

76

54paS

6.7% Female

4.4% of the Oarticipants attC and ST cat

0

20

40

60

80Pe

rcen

tage

atten

dance

es participants

OBC participatended the trategories, resp

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<25 Y

Figure 3

s were trained

Figure 34:

ant’s attendedainings as compectively.

Years (n=753)

14.80%

Ag

76

33: Age distribut

d as compare

: Sex distributio

the training smpared to 1.1

25‐45 Ye(n=339

66

ge groups of P

N=507

2

6.8%,

N=5074

SIHFW

tion of participa

ed to only 23.3

n of particpants

sessions whil1% and 21.5

ears 6)

>45 Y

6.90%

Participants

74

23.2%,

W: an ISO:9001:

nts

3% males’ pa

s

e 23.0% Gen% participant

Years (n=921)

18.20%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

articipants

neral categoryts who belong

es(n=1182)

ales(n=3892)

stitution

34

y ged to

N

Note: Data on

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

n education l

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

Figure 35: C

evel of partic

n=58) SC

1.10%

C

Caste distributio

cipants was

(n=1091) O

21.50%

Caste of the pa

N=5

SIHFW

on of participant

not obtained

OBC (n=2758)

54.40%

articipants

074

W: an ISO:9001:

ts

d from the st

General (n=1167)

23.00

:2008certified ins

tart from the

0%

stitution

35

NGO

DNTTTBIn

V

pa

T

A

4

District: Daus

NGO: Mata Sh


Batches compn Dausa distr

VHSC’s to be

articipants.

he total partic

Asha Sahyogi

1.1% were ot

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

a hree Gomati D

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 769 pleted: 110 ict VHSC trai

e trained till

cipants traine

ni’s, 3.1% m

ther members

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=638)

13.70%

Devi (MSGD)

1113

inings are be

March 2012

d can be divid

members from

s.

Figure 36:

ANM (n=219)

AW(n=6

%

4.70%

13

ing undertake

2. 86.7% par

ded into 13.7

m NGO, 1.0%

: Category wise

WW 619)

AS (n=709)

3.30% 15.20%

Category Of

N=4665

SIHFW

en in 5 blocks

rticipants wer

% PRI’s, 4.7%

% members f

divison of partic

NGO (n=143)

M(n

%

3.10%

f Participants

5

W: an ISO:9001:

s completing

re trained ou

% ANMs, 13.3

from MSS, 7

cipants

MSS n=48)

SHG (n=370

1.00%

7.90

:2008certified ins

72.3% of the

ut of 5383 in

3% AWW’s, 1

7.9 % SHG’s

0)Others (n=1919)

0%

41.10%

stitution

36

e total

nvited

15.2%

s, and

7fr

94

1.9 % particiom age group

4.0% Female

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pants belongp >45 years w

es participants

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

<25

ed to the agwhile only 16.

Figure

s as compare

Figure 38: S

5 Years (n=789

16.90%

A

64.0%,

e group of 259% participan

e 37: Age distrib

ed to only 36.0

Sex distribution

9) 25‐45 Y(n=33

7

Age groups of

N=4665

N=4665

SIHFW5-45 years, fnts who belon

bution of particip

0% males app

of participants

Years 352)

>45

1.90%

Participants

5

36.0%,

W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1nged to <25 y

pants

peared for the

5 Years (n=524

11.20%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

1.2 % particiyears of age g

e training.

4)

es(n=1679)

ales(n=2986)

stitution

37

ipants group.

Cpa

20uppa

Category specarticipants be

0.1% of the ppto 5-10th staassed 12th sta

0

10

20

30

40

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

cific distributioelonged to gen

participants weandard, 9.9% andard.Only 6

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

ST (

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illiter(n=31

6

on of participaneral categor

Figure

ere educatedparticipants s

6.9% participn

Figure 4

(n=1428)

30.60%

ate 15)

1‐5t(n=93

.80%20.

ants was 26.9ry.

e 39: Caste distr

upto 1-5th grstudied till 11nats were ille

40: Level of Educ

SC (n=775)

16.60%

Caste of the

N=46

h 37)

5‐10t(n=235

.10%

50.

Level Of Ed

N=4665

SIHFW9 % OBC 30.6

ibution of partic

rade another 5-12th standar

etrate.

cation of partici

OBC (n=1257

26.90%

participants

665

th 59)

11‐12t(n=461

60%

9.90

ucation

5

W: an ISO:9001:6 % ST, 16.6%

cipants

50.6% had thrd and 12.7%

pants

7) Genera(n=120

% 25

th 1)

>12th(n=593

0% 12.7

:2008certified ins

% SC and 25.

eir education% participants

al 5)

5.80%

h 3)

70%

stitution

38

.8 %

n

DNTTTBL

tr

83

O

S

ot

District: Dholp

NGO: LUPIN


Batches compUPIN was as

ained till Mar

3.8% membe

O the total tr

ahyogini’s, 0

ther members

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

pur

locks: 4

o be trained:

VHSC: 562 pleted: 90 ssigned VHS

rch 2012 is 7

ers out of the 4

rained,14.6%

0.8% member

s.

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=551)

14.60%

799

SC field level

70.3%.out of

4495 participa

were PRI

rs from NGO

Figure 41:

ANM (n=286)

AW(n=5

7.60%

13

training at 4

targeted 799

ants invited.

members, 7

O, 1.4% mem

: Category wise

WW 519)

AS (n=572)

3.80%15.20%

Category Of

N=376

SIHFW

4 Blocks of D

9. Total 90 ba

.6% ANMs,

mbers from M

divison of partic

NGO (n=32)

M(n

%

0.80%

f Participants

68

W: an ISO:9001:

Dholpur distr

atches were

13.8% AWW

MSS, 1.5 % S

cipants

MSS n=54)

SHG (n=57

1.40% 1.50

:2008certified ins

ricts. Total VH

conducted to

W’s, 15.2% A

SHG’s, and 4

7)Others (n=1697)

0%

45.00%

stitution

39

HSCs

o train

ASHA

45.0%

67ye

M

7.8 % participears while on

Male: Female

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pnats belongely 17.4 % par

ratio of partic

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

<2

ed to the age rticipants who

Figure

cipants was 3

Figure 43: Sex

25 Years (n=65

17.40%

62.8%

group 25-45 o belonged to

e 42: Age distrib

37.2%: 62.8%

x category distir

56) 25‐45(n=2

6

Age groups o

N=3

N=3768

SIHFWyears, 14.8 % <25 years ag

bution of partici

%

rbution of partic

Years 253)

>4

67.80%

of Participants

768

37.2%

W: an ISO:9001:% participantsge group

ipants

cipants

45 Years (n=55

14.80%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

s in age grou

9)

es(n=1401)

ales(n=2367)

stitution

40

p >45

32tr

Dst

2.0% of the Oaining

Distribution of tandard: 41.1

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

50.

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC, 7.7 % S

Participants a%, 11-12th st

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

Illiterate (n=346)

9.20%

T, 17.9% SC

Figure

according to etandard: 13.5

Figure 45: Le

n=292) S

7.70%

1‐5th (n=882)

23.40%

L

and 42.4 % g

44: Caste distri

educational le5%, 12th stand

evel of Educatio

SC (n=673)

17.90%

Caste of the

N=37

5‐10th (n=1549)

%

41.10%

Level Of Educat

N=3768

SIHFWgeneral categ

bution of partic

evel was, 1-5t

dard: 12.8%, I

on of participant

OBC (n=1206

32.05%

participants

768

11‐12th (n=508)

%

13.50%

tion

W: an ISO:9001:gory participa

cipants

th grade: 23.4Ililterate: 9.2%

ts

6) Gener(n=159

%

42

>12th (n=483)

% 12.80

:2008certified ins

nts attended

4%, 5-10th %

ral 97)

2.40%

%

stitution

41

the

DNTTTBT

ta

T

A

17

District: Dung

NGO: BCT


Batches comphe total VHS

arget of 900. 8

he total partic

Asha Sahyogi

7.9% were ot

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

18.00%

20.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

garpur

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 859 pleted: 126 Cs trained in

87.4 % of the

cipants traine

ni’s, 0.1% m

ther members

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=909)

16.40%

900

n dungarpur d

invited partic

ed are divided

members from

s.

Figure 46: Cat

ANM (n=656)

AW(n=

%

11.80%

1

district till Mar

cipants (6354

d into 16.4%

m NGO, 0.2%

tegory wise divis

WW 1053)

AS (n=101

19.00%18.3

Category

N=

SIHFW

rch 2012, are

) were trained

PRI’s, 11.8%

% members fr

son of participa

18)NGO (n=8)

30%

0.10%

Of Participant

=5553

W: an ISO:9001:

e 95.4% agai

d in 126 batch

% ANMs, 19.0

rom MSS, 16

nts

MSS (n=9)

S(n=

0.20%

1

ts

:2008certified ins

nst the const

hes.

0% AWW’s, 1

6.3 % SHG’s

HG =906)

Others(n=994

6.30%17.90

stitution

42

tituted

18.3%

s, and

s 4)

0%

72w

80pa

2.6 % particiwere in age gr

0.2% Femalarticipants

0.

20.

40.

60.

80.

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pnats belongoup >45 year

e participant

F

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

<25 Y

ed to the agrs while only 1

Figure 4

ts appeared

Figure 48: Sex di

Years (n=862)

15.50%

Ag

80.2%

e group of 2515.5% particip

47: Age distribut

for the tra

istribution of pa

25‐45 Ye(n=403

72

ge groups of P

N=55

19.8%

N=5553

SIHFW5-45 years, fpnats belong

tion of participa

aining as co

articipants

ears 33)

>45

.60%

Participants

553

W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1ining to <25 y

ants

mpared to o

5 Years (n=658

11.80%

Males(n=1

Females(n

:2008certified ins

1.8 % particiyears age gro

only 19.8%

8)

1101)

n=4452)

stitution

43

ipants oup

male

10ban

Th

0.9% of the Oelonged to Snd general ca

he education

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participaST category aategories, res

al level of the

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illitera(n=18

3.

ant’s attendedas compared

spectively.

Figure 49: C

e participants

Figure 50

=3828) S

68.90%

ate 86)

1‐5th(n=133

30%

24.

the training sto 6.1% and

Caste distributio

s is depicted i

0: Level of Educa

SC (n=337)

6.10%

Caste of the

N=5553

h 38)

5‐10t(n=266

10%

48.

Level Of Edu

N=555

SIHFWsessions whil14.1 % partic

on of participant

n the followi

ation of participa

OBC (n=605

10.90%

participants

3

h 68)

11‐12t(n=848

00%

15.

ucation

53

W: an ISO:9001:e 68.9 % parcipants who b

ts

ng bar diagra

ants

5) Gene(n=78

%14

th 8)

>12th(n=513

30% 9.2

:2008certified ins

rticipants belonged to S

am

ral 83)

4.10%

h 3)

20%

stitution

44

C

DNTTTNT

V

T

A

m

District: Gang

NGO: Maharis


No. of batchehe training a

VHSC’s to be t

he total of Ac

AWW, 8.8% A

members and

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

articipa

nts

ganagar shi Dayanana

locks: 7

o be trained:

VHSC: 2678

s completedt Ganganaga

trained .The t

ctual participa

Asha Sahyogi

55.6% others

PRI (n=1236)

A(n=

10.50%

d Vikas Sami

2733

8

d: 258

ar district star

total of 98.0 %

ants (11814) c

ni’s, 1.6% me

s.

Figure 51

ANM =473)

AWW(n=114

4.09%

9.7

iti (MDVS)

rted as early

% VHSC were

can be split in

embers form

1: Category wise

W 48)

AS (n=1043)

70%8.80%

Category O

N=1

SIHFW

as May, 201

e trained till M

nto 10.5% PR

NGO, 1.2% m

e divison of part

NGO (n=190) (

%

1.60%

f Participants

1814

W: an ISO:9001:

0 owing to it

March 2012 .

RI Members,

members from

ticipants

MSS (n=142)

SH(n=1

1.20%

8

:2008certified ins

ts large numb

4.0% ANMs,

m MSS 8.6%

HG 1018)

Other(n=656

8.60%

55.6

stitution

45

ber of

9.7%

SHG

rs 64)

60%

Tbe

F

he age distribelonged to ag

emale particip

0.

20.

40.

60.

80.

Percen

tage

atten

dance

bution of the pge group of 25

pation was m

Fig

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

<25 Ye

61

participants is5-45 years.

Figure 5

much higher (6

gure 53: Sex dist

ears (n=1881)

15.90%

Ag

1.0%

s reflected in t

52: Age distribut

61.0%) compa

tribution of par

25‐45 Ye(n=776

65

ge groups of P

N=1181

39

N=11814

SIHFWthe bar diagra

tion of participa

ared to 39.0%

rticipants

ears 63)

>45

.70%

Participants

14

9.0%

W: an ISO:9001:am below whe

ants

% male partici

Years (n=2170

18.40%

Males

Fema

:2008certified ins

ere 65.7 %

pants

0)

s(n=4608)

les(n=7206)

stitution

46

Wpa

M5t

cl

With 49.5% of articipants be

Maximum (41.th grade and aleared 12th st

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participelonged to gen

2%) had theiranother 9.8%tandard.13.8%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illitera(n=163

13

pants, ST acconeral categor

Figure

r education u with educatio% participnats

Figure 55: L

n=27) SC

0.20%

ate 34)

1‐5th(n=320

.80%

27.1

ounted for onry.

54: Caste distri

pto 5-10th ston upto 11-12s were illetrat

Level of Educatio

C (n=4726)

40.00%

Caste of the

N=11814

h 03)

5‐10t(n=486

10%

41.2

Level Of Edu

N=1181

SIHFWnly 0.2 %, SC

bution of partic

tandard follow2th standard ate.

on of participan

OBC (n=5850

49.50%

participants

4

h 68)

11‐12t(n=116

20%

9.8

ucation

14

W: an ISO:9001:for 40.0% an

cipants

wed by 27.1%and 8.0% par

nts

0) Gene(n=12

%

10

th 60)

>12th(n=949

80% 8.0

:2008certified ins

nd 10.3 %

% in the rangerticipants who

eral 211)

0.30%

h 9)

0%

stitution

47

e of 1-o

DNTTTN

U

to

12

4

District: Hanu

NGO: URMUL


No of batches

URMUL at han

otal of 93.1 %

2.1% PRI’s,

.2% members

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

umangarh L

locks: 3

o be trained:

VHSC: 1775

s completed:

numangrah s

of the invited

5.3% ANMs,

s from MSS, 8

PRI (n=874) (n

12.20%

1775

5 : 157

uccessfully c

d participants

, 9.1% AWW

8.3 % SHG’s

Figure 56: C

ANM n=382)

AW(n=6

5.40%

9

ompleted 100

(7896) were

W’s, 8.9% Ash

, and 42.7% o

Category wise di

WW 661)

AS (n=646

9.30% 9.0

Category

N

SIHFW

0 % of the tar

trained in 157

ha Sahyogini

other membe

vison of particip

6)NGO

(n=671)

00%9.40%

y Of Participan

N=7140

W: an ISO:9001:

rgeted 1775 b

7 batches.

i’s, 9.4% me

rs, were train

pants

MSS (=290)

%

4.10%

nts

:2008certified ins

by March 201

mbers from

ned .

SHG (n=590)

O(n=

8.30%

stitution

48

12. A

NGO,

Others =3026)

42.40%

60fr

57pa

0.7 % participom <25 years

7.4% Femalarticipants

0

20

40

60

80

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pnats belonges age group w

e participant

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

<25 Y

ed to the age while only 16.

Figure

ts appeared

Figure 58: S

Years (n=1677)

22.80%

A

57.

group 25-455% participna

57: Age distribu

for the tra

Sex distribution

25‐45 Y(n=44

6

Age groups of

N=735

.4%

N=7350

SIHFW years, followats who belon

ution of particip

aining as co

n of participants

Years 460)

>4

0.70%

f Participants

50

42.6%

0

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 22.8 %nged to >45 y

ants

mpared to o

45 Years (n=12

16.50%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

% participantsyears age gro

only 42.6%

13)

%

es(n=3132)

ales(n=4218)

stitution

49

s were up

male

57tow

4ex

7.6% of the Oo ST categorywho belonged

1.9% of the pxpressed as t

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participay participants to SC and ge

participants wthe bar diagra

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illite(n=9

1

ants attended attended the

eneral catego

Figure

ith schooling am below:

Figure 6

(n=13) S

0.20%

rate 972)

1(n=

13.20%

the training strainings as c

ories.

59: Caste distri

upto 5-10th s

60: Level of Educ

SC (n=2315)

31.50%

Caste of the

N=735

1‐5th =1539) (

20.90%

Level

N=

SIHFWsessions whilecompared to

bution of partic

standard, the

cation of partici

OBC (n=423

57.60%

participants

50

5‐10th n=3076)

41.90%

Of Education

=7350

W: an ISO:9001:e 0.2 % partic31.5% and 10

cipants

educational l

pants

5) General (

%

10

11‐12th (n=908)

12.40%

:2008certified ins

cipants belong0.7% particip

evels of other

(n=787)

0.70%

>12th (n=855

11.60%

stitution

50

ged ants

rs are

)

%

DNTTTN

Ja2co

9

0

N

District: Jaipu

NGO: VISHAK


No of batches

aipur being a 161 VHSCs tovering 12063

.3% PRI’s, 5

.3% member

NGO.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

Percen

tage

Of P

artiicipan

ts

ur KHA

locks: 13

o be trained:

VHSC: 1947s completed:

big district is o be trained o3 (79.7%) par

.3% ANMs, 1

s from MSS,

PRI (n=1126)

9.30%

2177

7 : 286

divided into tof which only rticipants in 2

18.6% AWW’

3.9 % SHG’

Figure 61

ANM (n=642)

A(n=

5.30%

1

two i.e. Jaipu 1947 ( 89.6%

286 batches.

’s, 15.0% As

s, and 47.0%

1: Category wise

WW =2247)

AS(n=18

18.60%15

Categor

N=1

SIHFW

r I and II, hav% ) has been

sha Sahyogin

% were other

divison of parti

09)

NGO (n=66)

5.00%

0.50%

y Of Participan

2063

W: an ISO:9001:

ving a total of accomplishe

i’s, 0.5% me

members, th

icipants

MSS (=31)

% 0.30%

nts

:2008certified ins

13 blocks wited till March,

embers from

at were train

SHG (n=472)

O(n=

3.90%

stitution

51

th 2012

NGO,

ed by

Others =5670)

47.00%

Tye

F

he age distriears of age (1

emale particip

Percen

tage

atten

dance

bution of par14.3%).

pants (77.6%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

<2

rticipants is 2

Figure 62:

%) clearly outn

Figure 63: Se

5 Years (n=159

13.20%

77.6%

5-45 years (7

Age distributio

numbered the

ex distribution o

94) 25‐4(n=

%

Age groups

N=1

2

N=12063

SIHFW72.4 %) <25

n of participant

male particip

of participants

45 Years =8739)

72.40%

of Participant

2063

2.4%

3

W: an ISO:9001:years age g

s

pants (22.4%)

>45 Years (n=

14.

ts

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

roup (13.2%)

)

=1730)

30%

es(n=2707)

ales(n=9356)

stitution

52

), >45

Cge

22papa

Class specific eneral catego

2.3% of the articipants uparticipnats we

0.

5.

10.

15.

20.

25.

30.

35.

40.

45.

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

distribution shory.

participants pto11-12th stere illetrate.

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

ST (

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Illitera(n=135

11

hows 41.6% O

Figure

had schoolitandard and

Figure 65: Le

(n=1351)

11.20%

ate 58)

1‐5t(n=269

.30%

22.

OBC, 11.2 %

64: Caste distri

ng upto pri11.8% partic

evel of Educatio

SC (n=2177)

18.00%

Caste of t

N

h 93)

5‐10(n=55

30%

46

Level Of Ed

N=12

SIHFW ST, 18.0% S

bution of partic

imary level,cipants compl

on of participant

OBC (n=

%

4

the participan

N=12063

th 81)

11‐12(n=10

6.30%

8.

ducation

2063

W: an ISO:9001:SC and 29.2%

cipants

46.3%, upto leted their 12

ts

=5018) Gen

41.60%

nts

2th 007)

>12(n=14

30%11

:2008certified ins

% participants

secondary, 2th standard.1

eral (n=3517)

29.20%

2th 424)

1.80%

stitution

53

from

8.3% 11.3%

DNTTTNT

co

O

S

District: Tonk NGO: CECOE


No of batcheshe training at

onducted till M

Of the total t

ahyogini’s, 3.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

EDECON

locks: 6

o be trained:

VHSC: 1074s completed:t Tonk started

March 2012. 8

rained 12.9%

.3 % NGO’s,

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=779)

12.90%

1080

4 : 151 d in the first w

80.7% partici

% were PRI

1.5% MSS’s

Figure 6

ANM (n=358) (

%

5.90%

week of mont

pants were tr

members, 5

13.5% SHG’s

66: Category wis

AWW (n=815)

A(n=

13.40%

1

Catego

N=6

SIHFW

th of June, 20

rained of the i

5.9% ANMs,

s and 38.7% w

se divison of par

AS 660)

NGO(n=199

10.90%

3.30

ory of Particip

6062

W: an ISO:9001:

010. 151 batc

nvited 7512 p

13.4% AWW

were other m

rticipants

O 9)

MSS (n=89)

0%1.50%

ants

:2008certified ins

ches (99.4%)

participants.

W’s, 10.9% A

embers.

SHG (n=816)

O(n

13.50%

stitution

54

) were

ASHA

Others n=2346)

38.70%

70ag

63pa

0.5 % participge group whil

3.6% Femalearticipants

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pnats belongele only 12.3 %

es participan

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

<25

ed to the age % participants

Figure

nts appeared

Figure 68: S

5 (n=1044)

17.20%

A

63.6%

N

group 25-45 s were from a

e 67: Age distrib

d for the tra

Sex distribution

25‐45 (n=

7

Age group of P

N=60

36

N=6062

SIHFWyears, 17.2%ge group >45

bution of particip

aining as co

n of participants

=4274)

70.50%

Participants

062

6.4%

W: an ISO:9001:% participnats5 years.

pants

ompared to

>45 (n=747)

12.30%

M

Fe

:2008certified ins

were in <25

only 36.4%

%

ale (n=2209)

emale (n=3853

stitution

55

years

male

)

48pato

64an

8.1% of the articipants att

o SC and ST c

.5% participa1.4% who wend 13.0% par

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

Percen

tage

atten

dance

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

50.

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participtended the tracategories, re

ants were illitere educated rticipants pas

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n

1

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illiter(n=3

6

pants attendeainings as coespectively.

Figure 69: C

terate. 29.1% upto 5-10th ssed 12th stan

Figure 70: Le

n=862)

14.20%

rate 95)

1‐5(n=17

6.50%

29

ed the traininompared to 14

Caste distributio

% of the partstandard, 10.dard.

evel of Educatio

SC (n=865)

14.30%

Caste of P

N=6

th 762)

5‐10(n=25

9.10%

4

Level of Ed

N=60

SIHFWng sessions w4.3% and 14.

on of participant

icipants were.0% participa

on of participant

OBC (n=29

48.1

Participants

062

0th 509)

11‐1(n=6

1.40%

1

ducation

062

W: an ISO:9001:while 23.4% .2 % participa

ts

e educated unts studied ti

ts

08) Gen (

10%

12th 608)

>12(n=7

10.00%13

:2008certified ins

General catants who belo

upto primary ill 11-12th sta

n=1407)

23.40%

2th 788)

3.00%

stitution

56

tegory onged

level, ndard

DNTTTNT

a

pa

in

T

S

District: Sawa

NGO: CECOE



total of 100

articipants tra

nvited particip

he distributio

ahyogini’s, 0.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

ai Madhopur EDECON

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 727 s completed:t Sawai Madh

0 batches we

ained was 92.

pants is still le

on of particip

.5% NGO’s, 0

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=531)

11.30%

754

: 100 hopur started

ere conducte

.0% of the inv

ft untrained.

pants is 11.

0.5% MSS’s,

Figure 71

ANM (n=322) (

%

6.90%

in the first w

ed completing

vited participa

3% PRI’s, 6

17.7% SHG’s

1: Category wise

AWW n=654)

A(n=5

14.00%1

Catego

N

SIHFW

week of month

g 96.4% of t

ants (5089). A

6.9% ANMs,

s and 37.2% w

e divison of part

AS 559)

NGO (n=24

11.90%

0.5

ory of Participa

N=4684

W: an ISO:9001:

h of July, 201

the training.

A backlog of 4

14.0% AWW

were other m

ticipants

)MSS (n=23)

0% 0.50%

ants

:2008certified ins

0. By March,

Actual numb

405 (8% of the

W’s, 11.9%

embers.

SHG (n=829)

O(n

17.70%

stitution

57

2012

ber of

e total

Asha

Others n=1742)

37.20%

79w

F

9.7 % participwho were <25

emale particip

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pnats belongeyears of age

pation (77.0%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

ed to the age. Only 8.8 %

Figure 72

%) was better

Figure 73

<25 (n=537)

11.50

7

e group 25-45participants w

2: Age distributio

compared to

3: Sex distributio

25‐4

0%

Age grou

N

7.5.%

N=4684

SIHFW5 years, followwere in age gr

on of participan

males (23.0%

on of participant

45 (n=3734)

79.70%

p of Participan

N=4684

22.5%

4

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 11.5%roup of >45 y

nts

%)

ts

>45 (n

nts

:2008certified ins

% participnatsyears

n=413)

8.80%

Male (n=1079

Female (n=36

stitution

58

s who

9)

605)

37fr

9atpa

7.6% of the Oom SC and 2

.6% participattended schoarticipants pa

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

Percen

tage

atten

dance

1

2

3

4

5

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC participa20.9 % from S

nts were illiteool from 5-10assed 12th sta

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

2

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Illi(n

ants attended ST category.

Figure

erate. 30.8% oth standard. 7

andard.

Figure 7

=980) SC

20.90%

iterate n=450) (

9.60%

the training, 2

74: Caste distrib

of the particip7.8% particip

75: Level of Educ

C (n=833)

17.80%

Caste of Par

N=468

1‐5th n=1441)

30.80%

Leve

N

SIHFW23.7% were f

bution of partici

pants were edpants studied

cation of partici

OBC (n=1761

37.60%

rticipants

84

5‐10th (n=1994)

42.60%

el of Education

N=4684

W: an ISO:9001:from General

ipants

ducated upto till 11-12th s

pants

) Gen (n=1

%

23

11‐12th (n=367)

7.80%

n

:2008certified ins

category, 17

1-5th grade, 4standard and

110)

3.70%

>12th (n=432)

9.20%

stitution

59

.8%

42.6% 9.2%

DNTTTNS

co

pa

1

14

District: Siroh

NGO: Vaatsaly


No of batchestarting in Jul

ompleted till

articipants (36

1.6% PRI’s,

4.4% SHG’s a

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

i ya

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 519 s completed:ly, 2010 with

March, 2012

677).

9.3% ANMs,

and 33.9% ot

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=404)

11.60%

526

: 74 h two blocks

2. Actual nu

14.9% AWW

ther members

Figure 7

ANM (n=323) (

%

9.30%

(Sheogang a

mber of part

W’s, 9.8% As

s, were traine

6: Category wis

AWW (n=518)

A(n=

14.90%

Catego

N=3

SIHFW

and Pindawa

ticipants train

sha Sahyogin

ed in 74 batch

e divison of par

AS 342)

NGO(n=6)

9.80%

0.20

ory of Particip

3488

W: an ISO:9001:

ara), 74 batc

ned was 94.

i’s, 0.2% NG

es.

rticipants

)

MSS (n=210)

0%

6.00%

ants

:2008certified ins

hes (98.7%)

9% of the in

GO’s, 6.0% M

SHG (n=504)

O(n

14.40%

stitution

60

were

nvited

MSS’s,

Others n=1181)

33.90%

68in

A

8.4 % participn age group o

Again the fem

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pnats belongeof <25 years.

male participat

Fig

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

<25

ed to the age

Figure 7

tion (70.4%) w

gure 78: Sex dis

5 (n=510)

14.60%

Ag

71.0%

N

e group 25-45

77: Age distribut

was more tha

stribution of par

25‐45 (n=2

68.

ge group of Pa

N=34

29.0

N=3488

SIHFW5 years and a

tion of participa

n that of male

rticipants

386) >

40%

articipants

488

0%

W: an ISO:9001:another 14.6%

ants

es (29.6%)

>45 (n=592)

17.00%

Male

Fema

:2008certified ins

% participants

e (n=1032)

ale (n=2456)

stitution

61

s were

32

27wpa

2.5% ST, 29.

7.8% participwere educated

articipants pa

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

5% OBC, 24.

ants were illitd upto 5-10th

assed 12th sta

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n=

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illitera(n=97

27.

.2% General a

Figure 79: C

terate. 24.5%h standard, 8andard.

Figure 80: Le

=1133) S

32.50%

ate 70)

1‐5t(n=85

.80%24.

and 13.8 % S

Caste distributio

% of the partic8.3% participa

evel of educatio

C (n=481)

13.80%

Caste of par

N=3488

th 56)

5‐10(n=11

.50%

33

Level of Ed

N=3488

SIHFWSC participant

on of Participant

ipants had scants studied

on of Participant

OBC (n=1030

29.50%

rticipants

8

0th 163)

11‐12(n=29

3.30%

8

ducation

8

W: an ISO:9001:ts were traine

ts

chooling uptotill 11-12th st

ts

) Gen (n=8

%24.2

2th 91)

>12(n=2

8.30%6.0

:2008certified ins

ed.

1-5th grade, 3tandard and

44)

20%

2th 08)

00%

stitution

62

33.3% 6.0%

DNTTTN T

M

of

1

5

District: Sikar NGO: BCT


No of batches

he training a

March, 2012 c

f the invited p

1.6% PRI’s, 9

.7% SHG’s an

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

locks: 8

o be trained:

VHSC: 1229

s completed:

at Sikar starte

ompleting 98

participants (6

9.0% ANMs,

nd 39.6% oth

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=633)

11.60%

1253

9 : 136

ed in the firs

.1% of the tra

6621).

16.2% AWW

her members,

Figure 81

ANM (n=492)

A(n

%

9.00%

st week of Ju

aining. Actual

W’s, 17.3% As

participated.

1: Category wise

AWW n=889)

AS(n=9

16.20% 17

Categor

N=54

SIHFW

uly, 2010 .13

numbers of p

sha Sahyogin

divison of parti

S 948)

NGO (n=20)

7.30%

0.40%

ry of Participa

479

W: an ISO:9001:

36 batches w

participants tr

ni’s, 0.4% NG

icipants

MSS (n=11)

% 0.20%

nts

:2008certified ins

were conduct

rained were 8

GO’s, 0.2% M

SHG (n=314)

Ot(n=2

5.70%

3

stitution

63

ted till

82.8%

MSS’s,

thers 2172)

39.60%

Mbe

A

Maximum numelonged to th

As against 22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Percen

tage

atten

dance

mber of partice age group o

.2 % males th

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<

cipants (67.9of <25 years.

Figure 82: A

he group was

Figure 83: Sex d

<25 (n=860)

15.70%

77.8%

N

%) were from

Age distribution

s dominated b

distribution of Pa

25‐45 (

Age group of

N=547

22.2

N=5479

SIHFWm the age gr

n of Participants

by female (77

articipants

n=3718)

67.90%

f participants

79

2%

W: an ISO:9001:roup of 25-45

s

.8%) presenc

>45 (n=901

16.40

:2008certified ins

5 years and1

ce.

1)

0%

Male (n=1218

Female (n=42

stitution

64

15.7%

8)

261)

In

T

n line with tren

he education

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.

10.

20.

30.

40.

50.

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

nds observed

level wise dis

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=1

3.5

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illiter(n=3

6.2

d with other di

Figure 84: Ca

stribution of p

Figure 85: Le

193) SC (

0%

C

rate 37)

1‐5t(n=10

20%

19

stricts, the O

ste distribution

participants is

evel of educatio

n=854) OB

15.60%

Caste of Partic

N=5479

th 089)

5‐10(n=25

9.90%

46

Level of ed

N=54

SIHFWBC presence

of Participants

s depicted in t

on of Participant

BC (n=3314)

60.50%

cipants

0th 518)

11‐12(n=7

6.00%

13

ducation

79

W: an ISO:9001: was (60.5%)

the bar diagra

ts

Gen (n=1118)

20.40%

2th 29)

>12(n=80

3.30% 14

:2008certified ins

) well palpable

am below:

th 06)

4.70%

stitution

65

e.

DNTTTN T

20

in

T

S

O13

District: Pali NGO: Ambuja


No of batches

he training a

012 completin

nvited particip

he participatio

ahyogini’s, 1.

Once again the3.0 % particip

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

Cement Fou

locks: 10

o be trained:

VHSC: 888 s completed:

t Pali started

ng 84.7 % of

pants (6727).

on pattern ob

.8% NGO’s, 3

e maximum ppants from ag

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=671)

11.50%

ndation

1049

: 129

d in the last w

the training.

bserved was:

3.7% MSS’s,

Figure 86: Cat

participation wge group of <2

ANM (n=605)

AW(n=

10.40%

week of July,

Actual numbe

11.5% PRI’s,

3.6% SHG’s

tegory wise divis

was (68.3 %) 25 years.

WW =961)

AS (n=77

16.50%

13.

Category

N=

SIHFW

, 2010. 129 b

ers of particip

, 10.4% ANM

and 39.1% ot

son of participa

from the age

1)NGO

(n=104)

30%

1.80%

y of Participant

=5810

W: an ISO:9001:

batches were

pants trained

Ms, 16.5% AW

ther members

nts

e group of 25-

MSS (n=216) (n

3.70%

ts

:2008certified ins

e trained till M

were 86.4%

WW’s, 13.3% A

s.

-45 years, wit

SHG n=211)

Othe(n=22

3.60%

39.

stitution

66

March

of the

ASHA

th just

ers 71)

10%

70

0% Female m

2

4

6

8

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

Figu

members appe

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

<

ure 87: Percenta

eared for the

Figure 88

<25 (n=756)

13.00%

7

age of participan

training as co

8: Sex distributio

25‐45 (n

68

Age group of

N=58

70.0%

N=5810

SIHFW

nts based on Ag

ompared to o

on of Participant

=3966)

8.30%

Participants

810

30.0%

0

W: an ISO:9001:

ge Group

nly 30% male

ts

>45 (n=1088)

18.70%

:2008certified ins

e participants

Male (n=1737

Female (n=40

stitution

67

7)

073)

49

Tbe

9.2% OBC, 2

he participanelow, with pa

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

atten

dance

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

1.6% Genera

ts based on trticipants edu

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

ST (

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Illiterate(n=481

8.30%

al while 21.7%

Figure 89

he educationucated upto 5

Figure 90: Le

(n=436) SC

7.50%

e )

1‐5th (n=1400

%

24.10

% SC and 7.5

9: Caste distribut

al category a-10th standard

evel of educatio

C (n=1263)

21.70%

Caste of Par

N=5810

0)5‐10th (n=2570

0%

44.20

Level of Educ

N=5810

SIHFW% ST particip

tion of Participa

re distributedd (44.2%) dom

on of Participant

OBC (n=2857)

49.20%

rticipants

0

0)11‐12th(n=688)

0%

11.80

cation

0

W: an ISO:9001:pants were tra

ants

d as per the baminating the g

ts

Gen (n=125

21.6

h )

>12th (n=671)

0% 11.50

:2008certified ins

ained.

ar diagram plgroup.

54)

60%

)

0%

stitution

68

aced

DNTTTNTDag77

T

S

Nedfr

District: Naga

NGO: Rajastha



Deedwana, Degainst the tot7.6 % of the i

he total part

ahyogini’s, 0.

Note: Data oducation courom the total

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

aur an Mahila Ka

locks: 11

o be trained:

VHSC: 1565s completed:t Nagaur staregana, Parbatal of 1676 Vnvited particip

ticipants train

.6% NGO’s, 2

n bifurcatiould not be o cannot be p

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

PRI (n=1054)

11.90%

alyan Mandal

1676

5 : 204 rted in the lasatsar and MaVHSCs was cpants (11392

ned are: 11.

2.6 % MSS’s,

Figure 91: Cat

n of participobtained for presented.

ANM (n=902)

AW(n=1

10.20%16

st week of Junakrana startecompleted. A2).

9% PRI’s, 1

7.5% SHG’s

tegory wise divis

pants basedthe initial m

WW 1479)

AS (n=1516)

6.70% 17.10%

Category of

N=8843

SIHFW

ne, 2010 at 5ed.Till date traActual numbe

0.2% ANMs,

and 36.0% o

son of participa

d on age gromonths hence

)NGO (n=51)

M(n=

%

0.60%3

f Participants

3

W: an ISO:9001:

5 blocks nameaining of 204ers of particip

, 16.7% AW

other member

nts

oup, caste, e the percen

MSS =282)

SHG (n=373

3.20% 4.20%

:2008certified ins

ely Kuchaman4 batches (93pants trained

WW’s, 17.1%

rs.

sex and levntage distrib

)Others (n=3186)

%

36.00%

stitution

69

n city, 3.4%) were

Asha

vel of bution

DNTTTN

T

co

th

10

4

District: Kota NGO: Rajastha


No of batches

he training a

onducted, com

he invited part

0.8% PRI’s, 4

.8% SHG’s an

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

an Voluntary

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 802

s completed:

at Kota starte

mpleting 98.6

ticipants (556

4.7% ANMs,

nd 51.1% oth

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=554)

10.80%

Health Assoc

813

: 116

ed in the se

6% of the trai

65).

12.7% AWW

her members,

Figure 92: Cat

ANM (n=242)

A(n

4.70%

1

ciation

econd week

ning. Actual n

W’s, 11.0% As

were trained

tegory wise divis

AWW =653)

AS (n=56

12.70% 11.0

Category

N=

SIHFW

of July, 201

number of pa

sha Sahyogin

.

son of participa

65)NGO (n=70)

00%

1.40%

y of Participan

=5141

W: an ISO:9001:

0. Total of 1

articipants tra

ni’s, 1.4% NG

nts

MSS (n=179) (n

3.50%

nts

:2008certified ins

116 batches

ined was 92.4

GO’s, 3.5% M

SHG n=249)

Othe(n=26

4.80%

51.1

stitution

70

were

4% of

MSS’s,

ers 29)

10%

74be

65

4.3 % particielonging to <2

5.1% Female

0

20

40

60

80

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pants belong25 years age

es were traine

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<2

ged to the ag group while

Figure 93: A

ed as compare

Figure 94: Se

25 (n=690)

13.40%

A

65.1

ge group of 212.2 % partic

Age distribution

ed to only 34.

ex distribution o

25‐45 (n=

7

Age group of P

N=5141

%

N=5141

SIHFW25-45 years, cipants were f

n of participants

.9% males

of Participants

=3822)

74.30%

Participants

34.9%

1

W: an ISO:9001:followed by 1from age grou

s

>45 (n=629)

12.20%

M

F

:2008certified ins

13.4% particiup >45 years.

Male (n=1792)

emale (n=3349

stitution

71

ipants

9)

46at

6(4

6.8% of the Ottended the tr

.8% participa47.9%) howev

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC, 18.8% rainings.

ants were illitever were educ

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=3

ST, 20.0% S

Figure 95

erate. 28.9% cated upto 5-

Figure 96: Le

n=968) SC

18.80%

erate 349)

1‐(n=

6.80%

2

C and 14.4 %

5: Caste distribut

of the partici10th standard

evel of educatio

C (n=1029)

20.00%

Caste of Par

N=5141

‐5th 1488)

5(n=

28.90%

Level of Educ

N=514

SIHFW% participants

tion of Participa

pants studiedd.

on of Participant

OBC (n=2405)

46.80%

rticipants

1

‐10th =2465)

1(

47.90%

cation

41

W: an ISO:9001:s General Ca

ants

d till 1-5th gra

ts

) Gen (n=7

%

14.4

11‐12th n=436)

8.50%

:2008certified ins

tegory partici

ade. The max

39)

40%

>12th (n=403)

7.80%

stitution

72

ipants

ximum

DNTTTNT

w

T

S

District: Karau

NGO: ECAT B



were trained. A

he participan

ahyogini’s, 0.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

uli Bodhgram

locks: 5

o be trained:

VHSC: 715 s completed:t Karauli start

Actual numbe

nts distributio

.6% NGO’s, 8

PRI (n=490)

13.30%

888

: 92 ed in the last

ers of participa

on was 13.3

8.0% MSS’s,

Figure 97:

ANM (n=336)

AW(n=

9.10%

20

week of July

ants trained w

3% PRI’s, 9

0.8% SHG’s

: Category wise

WW 773)

AS (n=724

0.90%19.6

Category of

N=36

SIHFW

y, 2010. By M

were 68.8% o

9.1% ANMs,

and 27.6% w

divison of parti

4)NGO (n=23)

60%

0.60%

f Participants

690

W: an ISO:9001:

arch, 2012, 9

f the invited p

20.9% AWW

were other me

cipants

MSS (n=296)

S(n

8.00%

:2008certified ins

92 batches (80

participants (5

W’s, 19.6%

mbers.

SHG =30)

Other(n=101

0.80%

27.60

stitution

73

0.5%)

5360).

Asha

rs 18)

0%

7be

72

1.0 % participelonged to >4

2.7% of Fema

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance


ales and 27.3

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

<25

ged to the agegroup while o

Figure 98

3% males atte

Figure 99: Se

(n=563)

15.30%

A

72.7%

e group 25-45only 15.3 % p

8: Age distrinutio

ended the trai

x distribution of

25‐45 (n=2

71

Age group of Pa

N=3690

%

N=3690

SIHFW5 years, followparticipants we

on of participan

ining.

f Participants

2621)

.00%

articipants

0

27.3%

0

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 13.7%ere from age

ts

>45 (n=506)

13.60%

:2008certified ins

% participantsgroup <25 ye

%

Male (n=1007

Female (n=26

stitution

74

s who ears.

7)

683)

3K

4

1.9% OBC, 3Karauli.

.6% participa

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

32.3% genera

nts were illite

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n=

2

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Illitera(n=17

4.60

al, 14.1% SC

Figure 10

rate while ma

Figure 101: L

=800) SC

21.70%

ate 0)

1‐5th(n=86

0%

23.6

C and 21.7 %

00: Caste distribu

ajority (49.5%

Level of educatio

(n=522) OB

14.10%

Caste of Partic

N=3690

h 69)

5‐10t(n=18

60%

49.

Level of Ed

N=369

SIHFW% ST were tra

ution of Particip

%) was educat

on of Participan

BC (n=1177)

31.90%

cipants

th 27)

11‐12(n=41

50%

11

ducation

90

W: an ISO:9001:ained during

pants

ted upto 5-10t

nts

Gen (n=1191)

32.30%

2th 14)

>12(n=4

1.20% 11.

:2008certified ins

VHSC trainin

th standard.

%

th 10)

.10%

stitution

75

ngs at

DNTTTNT

co

to

ac

pa

O

S

District: Jodhp

NGO: SURE, U


No of batcheshe training a

onducted till 3

o reallocate th

ccomplish the

articipants tra

Of the total (

ahyogini’s, 9.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pur URMUL

locks: 9

o be trained:

VHSC: 1588

s completed:at Jodhpur st

31st of Decem

he area and o

e feat. By the

ained was 88.

(10374), 8.9

.7% NGO’s, 8

PRI (n=919)

A(n

8.90%

1912

8 : 240

tarted in the

mber, 2010 wh

one more NG

e end of Marc

.4% of the inv

% were PR

8.3% MSS’s,

Figure 10

ANM =812)

AW(n=15

7.80%

1

second wee

hich left a bac

O (URMUL) w

ch, 2012, 83

vited participa

I members,

14.6% SHG’s

02: Category wis

WW 565)

AS (n=1017

5.10%

9.80

Category

N

SIHFW

ek of August,

cklog of 90.1

was barged i

.1% VHSCs w

ants (11739).

7.8% ANMs

s and 25.8% o

se divison of pa

7)NGO

(n=1002)

0% 9.70%

y of Participan

N=10374

W: an ISO:9001:

, 2010. Only

% which com

n, in Decemb

were trained

s, 15.1% AW

other membe

rticipants

MSS (n=865) (n

%8.30%

nts

:2008certified ins

26 batches

mpelled the sy

ber, 2010, to t

.Actual numb

WW’s, 9.8%

ers.

SHG n=1517)

Oth(n=2

14.60%

2

stitution

76

were

ystem

timely

ber of

Asha

hers 2677)

25.80%

65gr

T

5.1 % particiroup of >45 w

here were 75

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pants belonwhile 16.1%b

5.2% of Fema

Fi

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

<25

ged to the abelong to < 25

Figure 103

ales compared

igure 104: Sex d

(n=1674)

16.10%

Age

75.2%

N

age group 255 age group

: Age distributio

d to only 24.8

distribution of Pa

25‐45 (n=67

65.1

e group of Par

N=10374

24.8%

%

N=10374

SIHFW-45 years, 18

on of participan

8% male partic

articipants

757) >45

10%

rticipants

4

%

W: an ISO:9001:8.4% particip

ts

cipants.

5 (n=1943)

18.70%

:2008certified ins

pants were in

Male (n=2568

Female (n=78

stitution

77

n age

8)

806)

58wS

Tpa

8.8% of the was only 21.7

T category.

he educationarticipants we

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

OBC particip%, SC partic

nal level of ere illiterate.

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

ST (n

0.00%

5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

0.00%

Illite(n=2

2

pant’s attendecipation accou

Figure 1

participants

Figure 106: L

n=335) SC

3.20%

erate 2131)

1‐5(n=29

20.50%

2

ed the traininunted for 16.2

105: Caste distri

predominant

Level of educatio

C (n=1685)

16.20%

Caste of Par

N=10374

5th 990)

5‐10(n=36

8.80%

35.

Level of Ed

N=103

SIHFWn sessions G2% and 3.2 %

bution of Partic

ly was from

on of Participan

OBC (n=6104)

58.80%

rticipants

4

0th 696)

11‐12(n=84

.60%

8

ducation

374

W: an ISO:9001:General categ% participant

cipants

5-10th stand

nts

Gen (n=225

22.7

2th 44)

>12t(n=71

.10% 6.9

:2008certified ins

ory represens belonged to

dard while 3

54)

0%

h 13)

90%

stitution

78

ntation o and

35.6%

DNTTTNT

C

A

1

an

District: Jhunj

NGO: SRKPS



Chirawa starte

Actual number

1.9% ANMs,

nd 32.4% oth

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

jhunu

locks: 8

o be trained:

VHSC: 1001

s completed:t Jhunjhunu s

ed. By March

r of participan

17.4% AWW

her members,

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=719)

12.30%

1001

: 131

started in the

2012, 131 ba

nts trained wa

W’s, 20.9% As

attended the

Figure 107

ANM (n=697)

A(n=

% 11.90%

last week of J

atches were c

as 91.3% of t

sha Sahyogin

e trainings.

7: Category wise

AWW =1021)

AS (n=12

17.40%

20

Category

N=58

SIHFW

July, 2010 at

onducted, co

the invited pa

ni’s, 0.6% NG

e divison of part

21)NGO (n=36)

0.90%

0.60%

y of Participan

855

W: an ISO:9001:

2 blocks nam

ompleting 10

articipants (64

GO’s, 1.7% M

ticipants

MSS (n=99) (n

%1.70%

nts

:2008certified ins

mely jhunjhun

0% of the trai

413). 12.3% P

SS’s, 2.8% S

SHG n=164)

Othe(n=18

2.80%

32

stitution

79

u and

ining.

PRI’s,

SHG’s

ers 898)

2.40%

74be

F


emale particip

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pants belonge45 years age

pants (85.6%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<

ed to the agegroup.Only 1

Figure 1

%) again outwi

Figure 10

25 (n=663)

11.30%

A

e group 25-451.3 % particip

108: Age distribu

tted the male

09: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=

7

Age group of P

N=5855

85.6%

N=5855

SIHFW5 years, followpants were fro

ution of particip

es (14.4%).

ion of Participan

=4386)

74.90%

Participants

5

14.4%

5

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 13.8%om age group

pants

nts

>45 (n=806)

13.80%

:2008certified ins

% participantsp <25 years.

Male (n=842)

Female (n=50

stitution

80

s who

)

013)

623

ofed13

2.9% of the O.7 % ST categ

f the 5855, ducation upto3.0% particip

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

atten

dance

1

2

3

4

5

6

Percen

tage

atten

dance

OBC participagory participa

3.1% were o 5-10th standants qualified

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Illit(n=

3

ant’s attendedants attended

Figure

illiterate, 14.4dard and anotd 12th standar

Figure 1

n=216) SC

3.70%

terate =181)

1‐(n=

3.10%

1

the training s.

e 110: Caste dist

4% were edther 16.6% pad.

111: Level of edu

C (n=1427)

24.40%

Caste of Pa

N=5

‐5th =841)

5‐1(n=3

14.40%

5

Level of

N=5

SIHFWsessions whil

tribution of Part

ucated upto articipants stu

ucation of Partic

OBC (n=3682

62.90%

articipants

5855

10th 3099)

11‐(n=

52.90%

1

Education

5855

W: an ISO:9001:e 24.4% SC,

ticipants

1-5th grade,udied till 11-1

cipants

2) Gen (n=5

%

9.1

‐12th =970)

>1(n=

16.60%1

:2008certified ins

9.1% Genera

, 52.9% had2th standard.

530)

10%

12th =764)

13.00%

stitution

81

al and

their Only

DNTTTNT

B

A

10

0

District: Jhala

NGO: IIRD



akani, Khanp

Actual number

0.5% of the t

.5% NGO’s, 6

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

awar

locks: 6

o be trained:

VHSC: 1492

s completed:t Jhalawar st

pur and M.tha

r of participan

trained were

6.4% MSS’s,

PRI (n=1027) (n

10.50%

1492

2 : 214 tarted in June

ana.214 batchnts trained wa

PRI members

3.7% SHG’s

Figure 11

ANM n=426)

AW(n=10

4.30%

10

e, 2010 at all

hes (100%) was 93.8% of th

s, 4.3% ANM

and 51.8% w

2: Category wis

WW 034)

AS (n=1199

0.60%12.20

Category o

N=

SIHFW

the 6 blocks

were complehe invited part

Ms, 10.6% AW

were other me

e divison of par

9)NGO (n=50)

0%

0.50%

of Participants

=9797

W: an ISO:9001:

s namely J.Pa

eted till 31st ticipants (104

WW’s, 12.2%

embers.

rticipants

MSS (n=624)

S(n=

6.40%3

s

:2008certified ins

atan, Pirawa,

of October,444).

Asha Sahyo

HG =361)

Other(n=507

3.70%

51.80

stitution

82

Dug,

2010.

gini’s,

rs 76)

0%

65ye

O

5.8 % participears of age w

Once again Fe

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

Percen

tage

atten

dance

pnats belongewhile only 15.7

Figu

emale (61.1%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

<25 (n

ed to the age 7 % participan

ure 113: Percent

%) outmaneuve

Figure 11

n=1804)

18.40%

Age

61.1%

group 25-45 nts were from

tage of participa

ered the male

14: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=645

65.80

group of Parti

N=9797

N=9797

SIHFWyears, 18.4%

m age group >

ants based on A

e’s participant

ion of Participan

50) >45

0%

icipants

38.9%

7

W: an ISO:9001:% participnats >45 years.

Age Group

ts (38.9%) in

nts

(n=1543)

15.70%

:2008certified ins

belonged to <

attendance.

Male (n=3811

Female (n=59

stitution

83

<25

1)

986)

CS

1gr10

Class specific C.

1.9% participrades, 33.9%0.2% particip

1

2

3

4

5

6

Percen

tage

atten

dance

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

distribution of

pants were ill% studied from

ants passed

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

ST (

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Illitera(n=116

11.9

f attendees w

Figure 11

literate. 34.1%m 5-10th stand

12th standard

Figure 116: L

(n=1298) SC

13.20%

ate 65)

1‐5th(n=333

90%

34.1

was 55.0% OB

15: Caste distribu

% of the parard, 10.0% w.

Level of educatio

C (n=1298) O

13.20%

Caste of Part

N=9797

h 37)

5‐10t(n=33

10% 33.

Level of Ed

N=9797

SIHFWBC, 18.5% Ge

ution of Particip

rticipants hadwere educated

on of Participan

OBC (n=5389)

55.00%

ticipants

th 18)

11‐12(n=97

.90%

10

ducation

7

W: an ISO:9001:eneral 13.2%

pants

d their educatd between 11

nts

Gen (n=1812)

18.50%

2th 78)

>12(n=99

0.00% 10

:2008certified ins

ST and 13.2

tion between-12th standar

)

th 99)

0.20%

stitution

84

%

n 1-5th rd and

DNTTTNTtitr

P

0

District: Jalore

NGO: Vaatsaly


No of batcheshe training all March, 201ained was 91

RI’s accounte

.1% NGO’s, 0

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

of P

articipa

nts

e ya

locks: 7

o be trained:

VHSC: 849 s completed:at Jalore sta12 completin.9% of the in

ed for 12.7%

0.8% MSS’s,

PRI (n=706) (

12.70%

840

: 121

rted in the fing 101.1 % ovited participa

% followed by

3.7% SHG’s

Figure 11

ANM (n=620)

AW(n=1

11.10%

18

irst week of of the total trants (6066).

11.1% ANM

and 42.1% ot

7: Category wis

WW 1012)

AS (n=636

8.20%

11.4

Category o

N=55

SIHFW

June, 2010. raining targe

s, 18.2% AW

ther members

e divison of par

)NGO (n=4)

0%

0.10%

of Participants

573

W: an ISO:9001:

121 batcheset. Actual num

WW’s, 11.4%

s.

rticipants

MSS (n=43)

S(n=

0.80%3

s

:2008certified ins

s were condumber of partici

Asha Sahyo

HG =208)

Other(n=234

.70%

42.10

stitution

85

ucted ipants

gini’s,

rs 44)

0%

72ye

M

2.9 % participears age grou

Male participat

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pants belongeup while but th

tion (31.8%) w

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

<2

ed to the age he youngster

Figure

was overreac

Figure 119:

25 (n=617)

11.10%

Ag

68.2

group 25-45 rs (>25 years

118: Age distrib

ched by Fema

Sex distribution

25‐45 (n=4

72

ge group of Pa

N=557

2%

N=5573

SIHFWyears, 16.1%of age) accou

bution of partici

ale participatio

n of Participants

4060) >4

.90%

articipants

73

31.8%

3

W: an ISO:9001:% participnats

unted for 11.1

ipants

on (68.2%).

s

45 (n=896)

16.10%

:2008certified ins

belonged to >1%.

Male (n=1774

Female (n=37

stitution

86

>45

4)

799)

5ca

Tgr12

1.7% OBC paategory cand

he educationrade 32.7% e2th standard.

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

articipants attidates out of t

nal distributioneducated upto

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

7.5

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

Illitera(n=17

31

ended the trathe total.

Figure 12

n of the partio 5-10th stand

Figure 121: L

418) SC (

50%

ate 60)

1‐5t(n=10

.60%

19

aining, only 7.

20: Caste distribu

cipants was: dard, 8.6% st

Level of educatio

(n=1313) O

23.60%

Caste of Parti

N=5573

th 064)

5‐10(n=18

.10%

32

Level of Ed

N=5573

SIHFW5 % attendan

ution of Particip

31.6% illiteratudied till 11-

on of Participan

OBC (n=2882)

51.70%

icipants

0th 824)

11‐12(n=48

2.70%

8.6

ducation

3

W: an ISO:9001:nce was obse

pants

ate, 19.1% e12th standard

nts

Gen (n=960

17.20

2th 81)

>12(n=4

60% 8

:2008certified ins

erved for ST

ducated upto and 8.0% pa

0)

0%

th 31)

8.00%

stitution

87

o 1-5th assed

DNTTTN T

8

nu

ye

T

7

72be

District: Jaisa

NGO: URMUL


No of batches

he training at

1 batches co

umber of par

et to be cover

he total train

.9% Asha Sa


0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

lmer L

locks: 3

o be trained:


t Jaisalmer s

ompleted till

rticipants train

red.

ed participan

hyogini’s, 5.6

pants from ag45 years age

PRI (n=648) (

17.30%

680

: 81

tarted concur

March, 2012

ned was 87.3

nts can be ca

6% NGO’s, 14

Figure 122

ge group of 25and only 11.1

ANM (n=283)

AW(n=

7.60%

1

rrently in 2 b

2 completing3% of the inv

ategorized as

4.9% MSS’s, 2

2: Category wise

5-45 years att1% participan

WW =428)

AS (n=295

11.50%

7.9

Category o

N=37

SIHFW

locks namely

g 100% of th

ited strength

: 17.3% PRI’

21.6% SHG’s

e divison of part

tended the trants were from

5)NGO

(n=211)

90%

5.60%

of Participants

736

W: an ISO:9001:

y Jaisalmer a

he VHSC to

4279 leaving

s, 7.6% ANM

s and 13.6% o

ticipants

anings, 16.1%age group of

MSS (n=558) (

14.90%

:2008certified ins

nd Sam. A to

be trained. A

g a backlog o

Ms, 11.5% AW

other membe

% participantsf <25 years

SHG n=80.6)

Oth(n=

21.60%

1

stitution

88

otal of

Actual

of 543

WW’s,

rs.

hers 507)

13.60%

65

52

5.5% Female

2.4% general

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

e participants

l, 24.6% OBC

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25

Figure 1

were trained

Figure 124

C, 17.9% SC a

(n=415)

11.10%

Ag

65.5%

123: Age distribu

compared to

4: Sex distributi

and 5.0 % ST

25‐45 (n=27

72.8

e group of Par

N=3736

N=3736

SIHFW

ution of Particip

only 34.5% m

on of Participan

T category pa

719) >4

0%

rticipants

6

34.5%

6

W: an ISO:9001:

ants

male.

nts

rticipants wer

45 (n=602)

16.10%

:2008certified ins

re trained.

Male (n=1288

Female (n=24

stitution

89

8)

448)

Tgr

he maximumrade while 21

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

m participation.0% participa

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=7

21

Figure

n (31.4%) waants were illite

Figure 126

=188) S

5.00%

rate 786)

1‐5(n=1

.00%

3

125: Caste distr

as from thoserate.

6: Level of educa

SC (n=669)

17.90%

Caste of Pa

N=3736

5th 172)

5‐10(n=8

1.40%

2

Level of E

N=3736

SIHFW

ribution of Part

e who had c

ation of Particip

OBC (n=920

24.60

articipants

6

0th 883)

11‐1(n=5

23.60%

1

ducation

6

W: an ISO:9001:

icipants

completed sc

pants

0) Gen (n=

%

5

12th 569)

12t(n=3

15.20%

9

:2008certified ins

chooling upto

=1959)

52.40%

th 48)

9.30%

stitution

90

o 1-5th

DNTTTN

T

w

tr

T

14

District: Rajsa

NGO: RVHA


No of batches

he training at

were conducte

ained was 78

he distributio

4.5% Asha S

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

amand

locks: 7

o be trained:


t Rajsamand

ed completin

8.2% of the in

on of the tota

ahyogini’s, 0.

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=728)

14.90%

969

: 153

started in No

g 98.9% of t

vited participa

al trained par

.3% NGO’s, 1

Figure 127

ANM (n=277)

A(n

5.70%

ovember, 201

the VHSC to

ants (6240).

rticipants is:

1.9% MSS’s, 2

7: Category wise

AWW n=803)

AS(n=70

16.50%

14

Category of P

N=4

SIHFW

10. By the en

o be trained.

14.9% PRI’s

2.8% SHG’s a

e divison of part

S 05)

NGO (n=14)

4.50%

0.30%

Participants

4878

W: an ISO:9001:

nd of March, 2

Actual numb

s, 5.7% ANM

and 43.5% ot

ticipants

MSS (n=92)

% 1.90%

:2008certified ins

2012, 153 ba

ber of partici

Ms, 16.5% AW

ther members

SHG (n=138)

Ot(n=2

2.80%

4

stitution

91

atches

ipants

WW’s,

s.

hers 2121)

3.50%

69be

A

9.2 % particielonged to >4

As against 77.

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance


6% Female p

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25

ged to age grgroup while o

Figure 128

participation th

Figure 129

(n=764)

15.70%

Ag

roup of 25-45only 15.7% pa

8: Age distributio

he male partic

9: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=33

69.2

e group of Par

N=4878

2

77.6%

N=4878

SIHFW5 years followarticipants we

on of participan

cipation was

on of Participan

378) >4

0%

rticipants

8

22.4%

8

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 15.1%ere from age g

nts

restricted to o

nts

45 (n=736)

15.10%

:2008certified ins

% participantsgroup <25 ye

only 22.4%.

Male (n=1094

Female (n=37

stitution

92

s who ars

4)

784)

32cabe

1mst

2.4% of the pategory particelonged to SC

1.3% participmaximum of 44tandard and 8

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

participants acipants attendC and ST cate

pants were ill4.0% had sch8.0% participa

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

7

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Illite(n=5

11

attending the ded the trainegory respec

Figure

iterate. 26.3%hooling from 5ants have pas

Figure 131: L

=345) S

7.10%

erate 550)

1‐5(n=1

1.30%

26

training beloings as comptively.

130: Caste distr

% of the part5-10th standarssed 12th stan

Level of educatio

SC (n=603)

12.40%

Caste of Pa

N=4878

5th 283)

5‐10(n=21

6.30%

4

Level of E

N=4878

SIHFWnged to genepared to 12.4

ribution of Part

ticipants wererd, 10.5% parndard.

on of Participan

OBC (n=235

48.90

articipants

8

0th 147)

11‐1(n=5

44.00%

10

ducation

8

W: an ISO:9001:eral category 4% and 7.1 %

icipants

e educated urticipants had

nts

1) Gen (n=

%

3

2th 10)

12t(n=38

0.50%8

:2008certified ins

while 48.2% % participants

upto primary d studied till 1

=1579)

32.40%

th 88)

.00%

stitution

93

OBC s who

while 1-12th

DNTTTNIn

A

15

4

District: Bhara

NGO: LUPIN


No of batchesn Bharatpur 1

Actual number

5.7% PRI’s, 5

.2% SHG’s an

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

atpur

locks: 9

o be trained:

VHSC: 1451

s completed:195 batches

r of participan

5.7% ANMs,

nd 43.7% oth

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

PRI (n=1468)

15.70%

1454

: 195

were conduc

nts trained wa

12.57% AWW

her members,

Figure 132

ANM (n=532)

A(n=

5.70%

cted till Marc

as 95.8% of th

W’s, 13.5% A

attended the

2: Category wise

AWW =1167)

AS (n=126

12.50% 13.

Category

N=93

SIHFW

ch, 2012 com

he invited part

Asha Sahyogin

e trainings.

e divison of part

67)NGO

(n=188)

50%

2.00%

y of Participan

353

W: an ISO:9001:

mpleting 99.8

ticipants (976

ni’s, 2.0% NG

ticipants

MSS (n=246) (n

%2.60%

nts

:2008certified ins

8% of the tra

68).

GO’s, 2.6% M

SHG n=396)

Othe(n=40

4.20%

43

stitution

94

aining.

MSS’s,

ers 089)

3.70%

70be

F


emale particip

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pants belonge45 years age

pants (62.4%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

<2

ed to the agegroup.Only 1

Figure 1

%) again outwi

Figure 13

25 (n=1186)

12.70%

A

62.

e group 25-452.7 % particip

133: Age distribu

tted the male

34: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=

7

Age group of P

N=9353

4%

N=9353

SIHFW5 years, followpants were fro

ution of particip

es (37.6%).

ion of Participan

=6562) >

70.20%

Participants

3

37.6%

W: an ISO:9001:wed by 17.2%om age group

pants

nts

>45 (n=1605)

17.20%

%

:2008certified ins

% participantsp <25 years.

Male (n=3521

Female (n=58

stitution

95

s who

1)

832)

60an

ofed10

0.3% of the Ond 3.5 % ST

f the 9353, ducation upto0.3% particip

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Percen

tage

atten

dance

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

atten

dance

OBC participacategory part

6.8% were o 5-10th standants qualified

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

00%

ST (n

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Illit(n=

6

ant’s attendeticipants atten

Figure

illiterate, 21.9dard and anotd 12th standar

Figure 1

n=324) SC

3.50%

terate =638)

1‐(n=

6.80%

2

d the trainingnded.

e 135: Caste dist

9% were edther 12.2% pad.

136: Level of edu

C (n=1574)

16.80%

Caste of Pa

N=9

‐5th 2046)

5‐(n=

21.90%

Level of

N=9

SIHFWg sessions w

tribution of Part

ucated upto articipants stu

ucation of Partic

OBC (n=5643

60.30%

articipants

9353

‐10th =4562)

11(n=

48.80%

f Education

9353

W: an ISO:9001:hile 16.8% S

ticipants

1-5th grade,udied till 11-1

cipants

3) Gen (n=1

%

19

‐12th =1139)

>1(n=

12.20%1

:2008certified ins

SC, 19.4% Ge

, 48.8% had2th standard.

812)

9.40%

12th =968)

10.30%

stitution

96

eneral

their Only

DNTTTN

T

tr

(8

T

16

District: Alwar

NGO: HPPI


No of batches

he training a

ained against

8385).

he total train

6.8% Asha S

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

r

locks: 14

o be trained:

VHSC: 1114

s completed:

t Alwar starte

t the target. A

ed participan

ahyogini’s, 0.

PRI (n=805) (

11.70%

2145

4 : 160

ed November

Actual numbe

nts can be ca

.9% NGO’s, 1

Figure 137

ANM (n=470)

AW(n=1

6.80%

1

r, 2010.Till M

er of participan

ategorized as

1.3% MSS’s, 6

7: Category wise

WW 1201)

AS (n=115

17.50%

16.8

Category o

N=686

SIHFW

March, 2012, O

nts trained wa

: 11.7% PRI’

6.2% SHG’s a

e divison of part

52)NGO (n=60)

80%

0.90%

of Participants

69

W: an ISO:9001:

Only 51.9% o

as 81.9% of t

s, 6.8% ANM

and 38.9% ot

ticipants

MSS (n=88) (

1.30%

:2008certified ins

of the VHSC

the invited str

Ms, 17.5% AW

ther members

SHG (n=423)

Oth(n=2

6.20%

3

stitution

97

were

rength

WW’s,

s.

hers 2670)

38.90%

76be

79


9.1% Female

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance


e participants

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25


Figure 1

were trained

Figure 139

(n=794)

11.60%

Ag

7


138: Age distribu

compared to

9: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=52

76.9

e group of Par

N=6869

20.

79.1%

N=6869

SIHFW

tended the trants were from

ution of Particip

only 21.1% m

on of Participan

279) >4

0%

rticipants

9

9%

9

W: an ISO:9001:

anings, 11.6%age group of

ants

male.

nts

45 (n=796)

11.60%

:2008certified ins


Male (n=1452

Female (n=54

stitution

98

2)

417)

18

Tgr

8% general, 5

he maximumrade while 9%

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

50.4% OBC, 2

m participation% participants

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=6

9.

25.6% SC an

Figure

n (52.7%) was were illiterat

Figure 141

=412) SC

6.00%

rate 621)

1‐5(n=1

.00%1

nd 6% ST cate

140: Caste distr

as from thosete.

1: Level of educa

C (n=1756)

25.60%

Caste of Pa

N=6869

5th 148)

5‐10(n=36

6.70%

5

Level of E

N=6869

SIHFWegory particip

ribution of Part

e who had co

ation of Particip

OBC (n=346

50.40

articipants

9

0th 619)

11‐1(n=7

52.70%

11

ducation

9

W: an ISO:9001:pants were tra

icipants

ompleted sch

pants

2) Gen (n=

0%

1

12th 784)

12t(n=6

1.40% 10

:2008certified ins

ained.

hooling upto

=1239)

18.00%

th 697)

0.10%

stitution

99

5-10th

DNTTTN

A

pr

M

ba

64

tr

T

14

District: Udaip

NGO: JJVS


No of batches

After much ad

roblems in fu

March 2012, th

atches.

4.1% particip

ainings were

he total train

4.9% Asha S

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

pur

locks: 11

o be trained:

VHSC: 458

s completed:

do the training

und transfer t

he NGO was

pants of the

done.

ed participan

ahyogini’s, 1.

PRI (n=226)

12.20%

2465

: 47

g at Udaipur

to the NGO c

s able to com

total invited

nts can be ca

.2% NGO’s, 3

Figure 142

ANM (n=167)

AW(n=

9.00%

started June

concerned, th

mplete only 18

strength (289

ategorized as

3.7% MSS’s, 3

2: Category wise

WW =343)

AS (n=277

18.50%

14.9

Category o

N=18

SIHFW

in all the 11

he trainings w

8.6% of the to

93) were trai

: 12.2% PRI’

3.5% SHG’s a

e divison of part

7)NGO (n=22)

90%

1.20%

of Participants

853

W: an ISO:9001:

blocks simu

were put at h

otal target to

ined. Further

s, 6.0% ANM

and 37.0% ot

ticipants

MSS (n=69)

3.70%

:2008certified ins

ltaneously. D

halt. As a res

be achieved

r in Septemb

Ms, 18.5% AW

ther members

SHG (n=64)

Oth(n=6

3.50%

37

stitution

100

Due to

ult by

in 47

ber no

WW’s,

s.

hers 685)

7.00%

72be

70


0.6% Female

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance


e participants

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25

ge group of 25and only 9.8%

Figure 1

were trained

Figure 144

(n=182)

9.80%

Ag

70.6%

5-45 years att% participants

143: Age distribu

compared to

4: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=13

72.6

e group of Par

N=185

%

N=1853

SIHFWtended the tras were from a

ution of Particip

only 29.4% m

on of Participan

346) >4

0%

rticipants

53

29.4%

3

W: an ISO:9001:anings, 17.5%age group of <

ants

male.

nts

45 (n=325)

17.50%

:2008certified ins

% participants<25 years

Male (n=545)

Female (n=13

stitution

101

)

308)

23

Tgr

3.0% general

he maximumrade while 4.5

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

l, 19.2% OBC

m participation5% participan

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=

4.

C, 5.8% SC an

Figure

n (43.1%) wants were illiter

Figure 146

=964) S

52.00%

rate 74)

1‐5(n=6

.50%

3

nd 52.0% ST

145: Caste distr

as from thoserate.

6: Level of educa

SC (n=107)

5.80%

Caste of Pa

N=1853

5th 624)

5‐10(n=7

33.70%

4

Level of E

N=1853

SIHFWcategory par

ribution of Part

e who had co

ation of Particip

OBC (n=355

19.20

articipants

3

0th 798)

11‐1(n=1

43.10%

10

ducation

3

W: an ISO:9001:rticipants were

icipants

ompleted sch

pants

5) Gen (n

0% 2

12th 185)

12t(n=1

0.00% 8

:2008certified ins

e trained.

hooling upto

=427)

23.00%

th 62)

8.70%

stitution

102

5-10th

DNTTTN

A

co

st

T

12

m

District: Chitto

NGO: CUTS


No of batches

After much d

oncuurrently

trength of 107

he total train

2.3% Asha S

member partic

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

orgrah

locks: 11

o be trained:

VHSC: 1541s completed:

delay the tra

in all the 11

749 participan

ed participan

Sahyogini’s, 0

cipated.

PRI (n=891) (

10.80%

1564

: 199

aining at chi

1 blocks. Till

nts.

nts can be ca

.4% NGO’s, 2

Figure 147

ANM (n=457)

AW(n=1

5.60%

1

ttorgarh dist

January, 20

ategorized as

2.1% SHG’s

7: Category wise

WW 1363)

AS (n=101

16.60%

12.3

Category o

N=82

SIHFW

trict started

012, 76.5% w

: 10.8% PRI’

and 51.5 % o

e divison of part

13)NGO (n=33)

30%

0.40%

of Participants

220

W: an ISO:9001:

in the mont

were trained

s, 5.6% ANM

other membe

ticipants

MSS (n=52) (

0.60%

:2008certified ins

th of June,

out of the in

Ms, 16.6% AW

rs.Only 0.6 %

SHG (n=176)

Oth(n=4

2.10%

5

stitution

103

2011

nvited

WW’s,

%MSS

hers 4235)

51.50%

74be

59


9.5% Female

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance


e participants

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25


Figure 1

were trained

Figure 149

(n=1163)

14.10%

Ag

59.5


148: Age distribu

compared to

9: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=61

74.2

e group of Par

N=822

N=8220

SIHFWtended the trants were from

ution of Particip

only 40.5% m

on of Participan

100) >4

0%

rticipants

20

40.5%

0

W: an ISO:9001:anings, 11.6%age group of

ants

male.

nts

45 (n=957)

11.60%

:2008certified ins


Male (n=3327

Female (n=48

stitution

104

7)

893)

27

Tgr

7.0% general

he maximumrade while 9.6

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

l, 44.7% OBC

m participation6% participan

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

1

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=7

9.

C, 13.7% SC a

Figure

n (45.1%) wants were illiter

Figure 151

1205) SC

14.70%

rate 786)

1‐5(n=2

.60%

2

and 14.7% ST

150: Caste distr

as from thoserate.

1: Level of educa

C (n=1123)

13.70%

Caste of Pa

N=8220

5th 134)

5‐10(n=37

26.00%

4

Level of E

N=8220

SIHFWT category pa

ribution of Part

e who had co

ation of Particip

OBC (n=367

44.70

articipants

0

0th 705)

11‐1(n=8

45.10%

10

ducation

0

W: an ISO:9001:articipants we

icipants

ompleted sch

pants

5) Gen (n=

0%

2

12th 875)

12t(n=7

0.60%8

:2008certified ins

ere trained.

hooling upto

=2217)

27.00%

th 20)

8.80%

stitution

105

5-10th

DNTTTN

C

in

ta

be

O

S

tr

District: Prata

NGO: CUTS


No of batches

CUTS: The no

n the month o

artgeted 934 V

een successf

Out of the tota

ahyogini’s, 1

ained.

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

apgarh

locks: 5

o be trained:


odal NGO for

of June, 2011

VHSC to be c

fully trained.

al 4838 traine

.0% NGO’s,

PRI (n=567) (

11.70%

934

: 108

VHSC trainin

and by Mar

covered in th

d participants

4.1% MSS’s

Figure 152

ANM (n=252)

AW(n=

5.20%

1

ngs at Pratap

ch 2012, the

e whole distr

s: 11.7% PRI

s, 16.0% SH

2: Category wise

WW =727)

AS (n=735

5.00% 15.2

Category o

N=48

SIHFW

garh initiated

total achieve

rict. 81.1% of

’s, 5.2% ANM

G’s and 31.7

e divison of part

5)NGO (n=48)

20%

1.00%

of Participants

838

W: an ISO:9001:

the block lev

ement amoun

the invited s

Ms, 15.0% AW

7% other me

ticipants

MSS (n=199) (

4.10%

:2008certified ins

vel VHSC trai

nts to 84.3% o

trength (5965

WW’s, 15.2%

embers have

SHG (n=775)

Oth(n=1

16.00%

3

stitution

106

inings

of the

5) has

Asha

been

hers 1535)

31.70%

70be

70

0.9% participelonged to >4

0.6% Female

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

ants from age45 years age

e participants

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

<25

e group of 25and only 16.5

Figure 1

were trained

Figure 154

(n=799)

16.50%

Ag

67.9%

-45 years atte5% participan

153: Age distribu

compared to

4: Sex distributi

25‐45 (n=34

70.9

e group of Par

N=483

N=4838

SIHFWended the trants were from

ution of Particip

only 29.4% m

on of Participan

428) >4

0%

rticipants

38

32.1%

8

W: an ISO:9001:nings, 12.6%age group of

ants

male.

nts

45 (n=611)

12.60%

:2008certified ins

% participants f <25 years

Male (n=1422

Female (n=34

stitution

107

2)

416)

13

Tgr

3.3% general

he maximumrade while 11

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00Pe

rcen

tage

Atten

dance

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percen

tage

Atten

dance

l, 17.3% OBC

m participation.1% participa

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ST (n=

6

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

.00%

Illite(n=5

1

C, 6.9% SC an

Figure

n (43.0%) waants were illite

Figure 156

3020) S

62.40%

rate 538)

1‐5(n=15

1.10%

3

nd 62.4% ST

155: Caste distr

as from thoseerate.

6: Level of educa

SC (n=335)

6.90%

Caste of Pa

N=4838

5th 530)

5‐10(n=20

1.60%

43

Level of E

N=4838

SIHFWcategory par

ribution of Part

e who had co

ation of Particip

OBC (n=838

17.30

articipants

8

0th 082)

11‐1(n=4

3.00%

8

ducation

8

W: an ISO:9001:rticipants were

icipants

ompleted sch

pants

8) Gen (n

0%

1

12th 406)

12t(n=2

.40% 5

:2008certified ins

e trained.

hooling upto

=645)

13.30%

th 82)

.80%

stitution

108

5-10th

report vhsc monitoring (may 2010 – march 2012)sihfwrajasthan.com/vhsc consolidated report.pdf ·...

Documents