reporting results: apa style psych 231: research methods in psychology
Post on 20-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
Why present your research?
Purpose of presenting your research– To get the work out there– to spur further research– allow replication– allow testing/falsifaction of your theory
Why a structured format?
To ease communication of what was done– forces a minimal amount of information– Provides consistent format within a discipline
• people know what to expect• where to find the information in the article
– Allows readers to cross-reference your sources easily
The ultimate resource for APA style is the APA Publication manual, but also lots of websites to help too.
Chapter 15 of your textbook is good too.
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Major goal: Clarity
Communicate with clarity. – Using a consistent format helps your reader
understand your arguments and the sources they’re built on.
• It also helps you keep track of your sources as you build arguments
– Avoid jargon when possible, don’t be too creative, avoid slang and colloquialisms.
– Avoid sexist and biased language– Also try to be fairly concise – don’t use a whole
paragraph when two sentences will do
Writing style
Psychological writing tends to differ from other academic writings
• Try to avoid using direct quotes, restate things in your own words.
• Footnotes are rare, they’re used to elaborate/clarify a point. Try to do so in the text.
Parts of a research report Title Page Abstract
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Body
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
References Authors Notes Footnotes Tables Figure Captions Figures
Abstract
short summary of entire paper– 100 to 120 words – the problem/issue– the method– the results– the major conclusions
Body
Hourglass shape
– Statement of purpose– Specific hypotheses (at
least at operational level)
Narrow focus
Body
Introduction– Background– Literature Review– Statement of purpose– Specific hypotheses (at least at operational level)
Body Methods (in enough detail that the reader can
replicate the study)– Participants
• How many, where they were selected from, any special selection requirements, details about those who didn’t complete the experiment
– Design (optional) – suggested if you have a complex experimental design, often combined with Materials section
– Apparatus/Materials– Procedure – what did each participant do? Other
details, including the operational levels of your IV(s) and DV(s), counterbalancing, etc.
Body Results (state the results but don’t interpret
them here)– Verbal statement of results– Tables and figures – these get referred to in the
text, but actually get put into their own sections at the end of the manuscript
– Statistical Outcomes
Body Discussion (interpret the results)
– Relationship between purpose and results– Theoretical (or methodological) contribution– Implications– Future directions (optional)
The rest
References– Author’s name– Year– Title of work– Publication
information• Journal• Issue• pages
Shell Shock 12
References
Fussell, P. (1975). The Great War and modern memory. New
York: Oxford UP.
Marcus, J. (1989). The asylums of Antaeus: Women, war, and
madness—is there a feminist fetishism? In H. A. Veeser
(Ed.), The New Historicism (pp. 132-151). New Yo rk:
Routledge.
Mott, F. W. (1916). The effects of high explosives upon the
central nervous system. The Lancet, 55(2), 331-38.
Showalter, E. (1997). Hystories: Hysterical epidemics and modern
media. New Yor k: Columbia UP.
When something odd comes up, don’t guess. Look it up!
Figures and tables
These are used to supplement the text. To make a point clearer for the reader. Typically used for:
– The design– Examples of stimuli– Patterns of results
Checklist - things to watch for
Clarity Acknowledge the work of others (avoid
plagiarism) Active vs. passive voice
– Active: Seltzer and Wahlheim (2003) hypothesized that speakers use to much passive voice
– Passive: It was hypothesized by Seltzer and Wahlheim (2003) that speakers use to much passive voice
Checklist - things to watch for
Avoid biased language– APA guidelines:
• Accurate descriptions of individuals (e.g., Asian vs. Korean)
• Be sensitive to labels (e.g., “Oriental”)
Appropriate use of headings Correct citing and references Good grammar APA style checklist