republic vs sebastian

4
G.R. No. L-35621 July 30, 1976 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, representeds by FRANCISCO F. SAGUIGUIT, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Agriculture Productivity Commission, petitioner, vs. HON. ALEJANDRO E. SEBASTIAN, Judge of the Court of HON. ALEJANDRO E. SEBASTIAN, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Davao del Norte, and MAYOR GELACIO GEMENTIZA and MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF TAGUM, Davao del Norte and all persons acting upon their orders, respondents. ANTONIO, J.: Appeal by cetiorari from the Order of respondent Judge dismissing Civil Case No. 288, of the Court of First Instance of Davao del Norte, ruling that the complaint therein is actually one of forcible entry and not an action for injunction (prohibition) with preliminary injunction, and consequently, the said court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action. On June 19, 1972, the petitioner filed with the lower court a complaint for injunction (preliminary and permanent) against the respondents Mayor and Municipal Council of Tagum, Davao del Norte. The complaint, aniong others, alleges: (1) That the plaintiff is a sovereign political entity with capacity to sue, represented by the Commissioner of the Agricultural Productivity Commission, an instrumentality of the national government under the executive branch created pursuant to Republic Act 3844, as amended, otherwise known as the Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines, with office address at Elliptical Road, Diliman, Quezon City, and which Commission by virtue of the reorganizational set up embodied in the Code has absorbed the functions of the Bureau of Agricultural Extension of the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources organized under Republic Act 680; the respondents Mayor and Municipal Council of the Municipality of Tagum, Davao del Norte; sued in their official capacity together with all Persons acting upon their orders, and may be served with summons at the Municipal Hall of Taguin, Davao del Norte; (2) That the national government is the owner of two (2) parcels of public land situated in Magugpo Tagum, Davao del Norte, Containing a total land area of approximately 74,527 square meters more particular, described as follows: ( Description of property ) (3) That since 1938, the alone parcels of land have been continuously used as demonstration station otherwise known as nursery, occupied openly, publicly, peacefully, adversely and uniterruptedly as such demonstration station first by the Bureau of Plant Industry, later by the Bureau of Agricultural Extension by virtue of Republic Act 680 and now by the Agricultural Productivity Commission under Republic Act 3844, as amended (Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines) serving its purpose as a demonstration center for the farm and rural population of the then undivided province of Davao; (4) That on March 2, 1972 the Municipal Council of Tagum, Davao del Norte, passed Resolution No. 78 approving the partition and segregation to different government offices for various purposes. Having been enacted without or in excess of jurisdiction of the

Upload: ravenfox

Post on 17-Aug-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

CJS

TRANSCRIPT

G.R. No. L-35621 July 30, 1976REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINE, !"#!"$"%&"'$ (yFR)NCICO F. )GUIGUIT, *% +*$ ,-#-,*&y -$ Co..*$$*o%"!o/ &+" )0!*,ul&u!" P!o'u,&*1*&y Co..*$$*o%, petitioner, vs.HON. )LEJ)N2RO E. EB)TI)N, Ju'0" o/ &+" Cou!& o/ HON.)LEJ)N2ROE. EB)TI)N, Ju'0" o/ &+" Cou!& o/ F*!$&I%$&-%," o/ 2-1-o '"l No!&", -%' 3)4OR GEL)CIOGE3ENTI5) -%' 3UNICIP)L COUNCIL OF T)GU3, 2-1-o '"lNo!&" -%' -ll #"!$o%$ -,&*%0 u#o% &+"*! o!'"!$, respondents. )NTONIO, J.:Appeal by cetiorari from the Order of respondent Judge dismissingCivil CaseNo. 288, of theCourt of First Instaneof !avaodelNorte, ruling that the omplaint therein is atually one of foribleentry and not an ation for in"untion #prohibition$ %ith preliminaryin"untion, and onse&uently, the said ourt has no "urisdition overthe sub"et matter of the ation. On June '(, '()2, the petitionerfiled%iththelo%er ourt aomplaint forin"untion#preliminaryand permanent$ against the respondents *ayor and *uniipalCounil of +agum, !avao del Norte. +he omplaint, aniong others,alleges,#'$+hat theplaintiff isasovereignpolitial entity%ith apaity to sue, represented by theCommissioner of the Agriultural -rodutivityCommission, an instrumentality of the nationalgovernment under the e.eutive branh reatedpursuant to /epubli At 0811, as amended,other%ise 2no%n as the Code of Agrarian /eforms ofthe -hilippines, %ith offie address at 3lliptial /oad,!iliman, 4ue5on City, and %hih Commission byvirtue of the reorgani5ational set up embodied in theCodehasabsorbedthefuntionsof the6ureauofAgriultural 3.tension of the !epartment ofAgriultureandNatural /esouresorgani5edunder/epubli At 7889 the respondents *ayor and*uniipal Counil of the *uniipality of +agum,!avao del Norte9 sued in their offiial apaitytogether%ithall -ersonsatingupontheirorders,and may be served %ith summons at the *uniipal:all of +aguin, !avao del Norte9#2$ +hat the national government is the o%ner of t%o#2$ parels of publi land situated in *agugpo+agum, !avao del Norte, Containing a total land areaof appro.imately )1,;2) s&uare meters morepartiular, desribed as follo%s, #Description ofproperty$#0$ +hat sine '(08, the alone parels of land havebeen ontinuously used as demonstration stationother%ise 2no%n as nursery, oupied openly,publily, peaefully, adversely and uniterruptedly assuhdemonstrationstationfirst bythe6ureauof-lant Industry,later bythe6ureauof Agriultural3.tension by virtue of /epubli At 788 and no% bythe Agriultural -rodutivity Commission under/epubliAt 0811, asamended#Codeof Agrarian/eforms of the -hilippines$ serving its purpose as ademonstration enter for the farm and ruralpopulation of the then undivided provine of !avao9#1$ +hat on *arh 2, '()2 the *uniipal Counil of+agum,!avaodelNorte, passedResolution No. 78approving the partition and segregation to differentgovernment offices for various purposes. Havingbeen enacted without or in excess of jurisdiction oftheunicipal !ouncil" theaforesaidresolutionisapatent nullity. Copy of said resolution is herebyattahed as Anne. out of the nursery ausing the%asteof asi5eableamount of government funds.+he efforts e.erted in the development of thepremises as a sho% %indo% and a seed propagationsite for the farmers in the provine %ill be negatedarid neessarily set at naught9#($ hat there is a ontinuing need for the operationof the nurseryinthe area, it beingasignifiantfator in the agriultural and eonomi developmentof the provine. +he nursery is needed to sho% anddisseminate information on thedifferent aspets ofagriultural andhomeativitiesandforsellinganddistributing planting materials to the people. +hus aontinuing publi need %ill be urtailed andfrustrated, most unfortunatelyat atime%hentheountryis inturmoil andurgentlyinneedofbasitool for agriultural development and eonomistability, if the ats of respondents are timelyabated9and prayed that pending determination of the petition, therespondents be en"oined from ontinuing %ith the ats omplainedof and after hearing ?to render "udgment declaring void the saidresolution of the *uniipal Counil of +agum, !avao del Norte, andto restore plaintiff