research and development vocational and technical 007 214 ... · problems of training, production...

DOCI'MF T RF StIMF

ED 023 890 08 VT 007 128

By Thomas, Rober t W.Research and Development in Vocational and Technical Edocation, Non -Metropolitan Areas, Area Development

and Iowa Area Maps.Final Report, Appendix Four,Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, Ames.Spons Agency-Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D C Bureau of Research.

Bureau No -BR -5 -0045Pub Date Jun 68Contract -DEC -5 -85 -108Note-139p.EDRS Price MF -S0.75 HC -S705Descriptors -*Area Vocational Schools, ICommunity Colleges, Maps, Post Secondary Education, Rural Areas,

*School Districts, *Technical Education, *Vocational EducationIdentifiers -Iowa

This appendix to Research and Development in Vocational and TechnicalEducation for Non-Metropolitan Areas" (VT 007 214) develops a rationale for areadevelopment programs under a concept of total education for action, and shows the

16 merged educational areas developed in Iowa over the period 1966-68. To enhanceunderstanding of the composition of the 16 areas, maps of Iowa public schooldistricts by counties are included grouped by area school heading. Other documents inthis series related to vocational and technical education in non-metropolitan areasinclude ED 011 068,ED 011 069, and VT 007 129-VT 007 131. (DM)

FINAL REPORTProject No. ERD 255

Contract No. O. E. 5-85-108BR. No. 5-0045

PC

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION:

NON-METROPOLITAN AREA; AREA DEVELOPMENT AND

IOWA AREA MAPS

APPENDIX FOUR

June 1968

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Office of EducationBureau of Research

FINAL REPORTProject No. ERD 255

Contract No. O. E. 5-85-108BR. No. 5-0045

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE

OFFICE OF EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE

PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS

STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION

POSITION OR POLICY.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION:NON-METROPOLITAN AREA; AREA DEVELOPMENT

AND IOWA AREA MAPS

APPENDIX FOUR

June 1968

The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contractwith the Office of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education,and Welfare. Contractors undertaking such projects under Governmentsponsorship are encouraged to express freely their professionaljudgment in the conduct of the project. Points of view or opinionsstated do not, therefore, necessarily represent official Office ofEducation position or policy.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Office of EducationBureau of Research

PREFACE

Appendix four reports a meaning for area development programsunder a concept of total education for action, and shows the sixteenmerged educational areas as developed over the period 1966-'68.

To enhance understanding of the coliTosition of the sixteen areasas structured for Iowa, maps (drawn to scale) of Iowa public schooldistricts by counties have been included. These have been groupedunder the sixteen area headings. The boundary lines for the publicschool districts are for the 1963-'64 school year, the most recentboundary line data available for research.

John D. Hanson and Jane Fink prepared the school district maps,adapting material prepared previously by Professors Glenn E. Holmes(Education) and Robert W. Thomas (Economics).

Robert W. Thomas, Associate Professor of Economics, Departmentof Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; and Chairman,Strategic Intelligence Unit of the Project for Research and Developmentin Vocational and Technical Education: Non-metropolitan Areas.

AREA DEVELOPMENT: A NEW CAUSE FOR LAND-GRANT SCHOOLS?

I. INTRODUCTION

I have called area development a "cause," because the work has its

champions and its critics. Possibly, for some, the word "direction"

would be preferred. For purposes here, either term fits.

Now let me expose my hand before I play it. I propose to argue:

(1) that area development may get top billing in the near future from

land-grant schools; (2) that area development work is in keeping with

land-grant school philosophy; (3) that land-grant schools enjoy a com-

parative advantage, if they choose to work in area development, but

(4) that problems of organizing for effective area development certainly

exist and are not to be lightly regarded.

Yet, and in short, I propose to change the question mark in the title

to an exclamation point.

II. A NEW CAUSE OR DIRECTION FOR TODAY?

Current causes universities have chosen to champion include: (1) urban

development, (2) minority group problems, (3) under developed countries,

and (4) domestic area development. Of the four, probably in the last two

land-grant schools enjoy a comparative advantage. Of these two, if the U.S.

economy becomes less buoyant, possibly only the last one, domestic area

development, will receive public support at state and local levels.

If our "grass roots" schools of the people seek to serve future gen-

erations as past generations have been served, greater attention to area

development may be required.

III. AREA DEVELOPMENT AND LAND-GRANT PHILOSOPHY, DO THEY GO TOGETHER?

Is area development in keeping with land-grant school tradition?

I believe so.

Land-grant school philosophy calls for helping "the people" (which

meant, 100 years ago, "the rural people") solve "critical problems"

(which were, 100 years ago, "domestic food problems").

Over the past century the major problems attacked included problems

of training, problems of production, and problems of learning new ways

of doing old things. Principles contained in original land-grant school

philosophy provided the rationale to support attack on these three problems.

4 ;72-

Today, these same principles can justify a present day attack on

problems of training, production and learning. The only adjustment

needed in the philosophy being considered is to be explicit about basic

principles which have by now become implicit in land-grant school action.

Being explicit about basic principles makes re-examination of the role of

land-grant schools much easier. Today's critical problems of training,

production, and re-learning are really not vastly different from yesterday's.

IV. A COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE TO DO AREA DEVELOPMENT, DO LAND-GRANT

SCHOOLS HAVE THIS?

A. What is it?

Area development can be defined as dealing with a bit of geography

and its attached human and non-human attributes. Because the area approach

focuses on people not pastures, area development seeks to help people in an

area to a richer life. Land-grant schools, have been concerned for agri-

cultural people because these people have been both numerous and needy.

Within area development, concern now would be shown for people in their

environment and over their life span, instead of in their agricultural

economic sector and aver their agricultural production activities.

Under area development the pie of human problems would be cut into

geographic areas, not into economic sectors. By this suggested change,

one would examine and work with all relevant aspects of area inter-action,

not just economic activity or physical phenomena. Within an area approach

the impact on popular behavior of ethnic sub-cultures and their traditions

could be examined.

B. Can land-grant schools do it better?

Because of the kind of "going concern" that the land-grant system

is, a rather simple shift in emphasis is all that is needed for pursuit

of area development. Because this minor change is all that is needed,

this would appear to give the land-grant school a comparative advantage

over other universities when doing area development. Land-grant schools

already are accustomed to involvement with the rank and file of our people

and their problems. Land-grant schools currently have staff committed to

the philosophy of helping these people help themselves. The nation's

land-grant schools, because of their kinds of teaching, research and

extension, already have extensive off-campus activities, and have strong

support from people being served. All that is needed is inter-disciplinary

area concern instead of intra-disciplinary commodity or economic sector concern.

V. FOCUSING ON AREA DEVELOPMENT, CAN IT BE HANDLED IN THE LAND-GRANT

STRUCTURES?

A. The land-grant organization problem

One needs to be aware of problems and difficulties of university

re-direction. Staff and administrators face the same problems of any

large organization when re-direction of activity is suggested. Because

of the nature of present-day university organization,numerous problems

present themselves when staff and administrators contemplate developing

inter-disciplinary area studies and educational programs.

As one of my colleagues says, "People have problems and colleges

have departments." In the environment of the present-day university,

a group of scholars trained in subject-matter disciplines and responsible

to given departments, find inter-departmental and inter-disciplinary

research, teaching and extension strange, to say the least. Launching

successful inter-disciplinary and inter-departmental studies for area

development is not easy. However, these studies can be developed for

they are being developed by several land-grant schools including South

Dakota State University.

B. The area delimiting problem

Assuming a University can organize a portion of its teaching,

research and extension programs for focus on area development problems,

for practical and operational purposes, how is an area to be defined for

study and for extension work?

In large part, the answer lies in the word, "homogeneity." Within

the chosen area, certain similarities among the people are needed. In-

cluded among needed similarities is an area focus on a central city or

trade center.

Because an area must be big enough to be "workable," that is to say,

capable of achieving objectives set for it, a central city is needed to

give economic focus. But how big an area around the city is needed?

Further, what are area objectives?

Practically speaking, a "workable" area is usually bigger than one

county, and smaller than a state. Area development is generally a group

of counties seeking common objectives of development focused on a central

city for economic activity.

C. The problem of development objectives

What, then are these "development objectives?"

- 4 -

Though I am an economist, note I have not said anywhere, so far,

that area development is equated to area economic development. Neither

have I said that the richer or fuller life to be sought for an area

equates to economic or materialistic objectives. I think that shows

remarkable restraint.

In our democratic society, a large dose of individualism is en-

couraged, and this individualism dictates a permissive kind of develop-

ment. In our democracy, "grass roots" development is sought. Therefore,

a large element of "permissive localism" would exist within the concept

of what are and what are not area development objectives.

Area development programs certainly include varying amounts of

cultural, social, religious, economic and educational development.

Therefore, development for a given area may have certain unique qualities

common to L;te culture and the people of the area. The development sought

is really a process of living, a process of expansion of interests.

Collective and individual achievements within the area which are in

keeping with the popular will of the area is workable area development.

Certainly in today's world, a significant portion of the interests,

concerns, and achievements within the area would be economic.

D. The functional economic area approach

The functional economic area approach may be desired. Such an

area for economic development needs a cluster of economic activities and

a mobile people within the area.

For 99 Iowa counties and three million Iowans, Karl Fox, Head,

Department of Economics, Iowa State University, has determined about

12 functional economic areas each having a "central city" and a sur-

rounding area running about 50 miles in each direction.

In these functional economic areas are contained home to work com-

muting patterns, as well as shopping patterns.

By studying these Iowa areas, each with a certain rural-urban

component, each with a certain set of internal homogeneties and consis-

tencies, one sees area socio-economic inter-action and hence one sees

the inter-dependencies of rural-urban groups within each area plus the

connective socio-economic tissue relating area to area.

E. How might a land-grant school organize for success in overcoming

problems of focusing on area development?

-5-

To conquer problems mentioned, staff and administrators might begin

by: (1) organizing groups of staff within the university to assess possi-

bilities for doing effective area development work, (2) seeking stable

and functioning areas so as to define terms like "workable areas and

n acceptable" areas for a given state, and (3) seeking to define area

objectives.

To date, no one has found this to come easily. Planning for area

programs requires involvement of numerous staff members and off-campus

leaders for both creative planning and for "legitimizing" focus on any

set of area problems.

The ground gained to date by most land-grant schools seems to be

secure. The foreseeable future course to follow appears clear.

VI. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, let me say I exposed my hand at the beginning. After

that opening exposure, I hope I played my cards clearly.

The main points to be made on the subject of area development work

by land-grant schools appear to be the following.

One,intra-state area development seems especially needed in the

sparsely populated non-metropolitan areas of the West North Central United

States. The land-grant schools by undertaking area development can perform

an effective service for people of the state. Because of this, these

land-grant schools will probably be giving area development work high

priority ratings in the future.

Two, area development work is in keeping with land-grant school

philosophy.

Three, land-grant schools probably have a comparative advantage

when it comes to doing effective area development.

Four, special care needs to be exercised in planning, "legitimizing,"

organizing, and delivering. The first area development program needs to

be a resounding success.

Merged Areas for Area Community Colleges (ACC)

and Area Vocational Schools (AVS)

OS

CE

OLA

OIC

cip

4501

4E

MM

ET

KO

SS

UT

HW

INN

ES

AZ

OM

ITC

HE

LLO

WA

ED

SIO

UX

O'S

EIE

NP

ALO

ALT

O

III

ACC

HA

NC

OC

K.

CE

RE

O G

OR

DO

II

ACC

FLO

YD

C 0

11C

t A

SA

W

FA

YE

TT

EC

LAY

TO

N

Y M

OU

T 1

1C

HE

RE

HA

ymy

PO

CA

HO

NT

AS

HU

MD

OF

RA

NK

LIN

512E

mE

R.

XII

AVS

WO

OO

DU

RY

LAV

YA

RE

CA

LHO

UN

HA

MIL

TO

NH

AE

DIN

VII

AVS

TA

MA

8T

ON

JON

ES

JAC

KS

ON

MO

NO

NA

CE

AW

FO

R.D

CA

RR

OLL

GR

EE

NE

ES

PIA

L!.

JAS

PE

RJO

HN

SO

N

5C.A

T1N

E

MA

DIS

ON

MA

MO

N

XIII

ACC

MIL

LST

60m

Eel

'U

NIO

NM

ON

RO

EW

AP

ELL

OJE

FF

ER

.50N

FR

EM

ON

TG

ET

AY

LOR

XIV

ACC

RIN

GG

OLD

AP

PA

N 0

0$ E

DA

VIS

I AVS

Howard, Winneshiek, AllamakeeChickasaw, Fayette, Clayton

HOWARD COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.

frw.".011"mr="111

1. Turkey Valley Comm.

2. New Hampton Comm.

3. Riceville Comm.

4. Howard-Winneshiek Coon.

3Cresco

4

VII

NN

E S

HIE

K C

OU

NT

YI

OW

A

scale: in = 1 mi.

Not in a High School District

as of August 30, 1963

1.

Turkey Valley Comm.

2.

Allamakee Como

3.

Postville Com.

4.

Howard.Winneshiek Comm.

5.

South Wianeshiek Coom.

6.

North Winneshiek Comm.

7.

Decorah Com.

3

2

AL

L A

M A

KE

EC

OU

NT

YIC

AN

A

scal

e :

" =

mi.


as of August 309 1963

kiau

Kor

t

1.

Eastern Allamakee Corm6

2,

Allamakee Com.

3.

Postville Comm.

4.

M F L Comm.

5.

South Winneshiek Comm6

CHICKASAW COUNTYI OWA

scale: t " = 1 mi.

or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Turkey Valley Comm.

2. New Hampton Comm.

3. Charles City Comm*

4, Sumner Ckmm.

5. Fredericksburg Can.

6. Nashua Comm.

7. Tripoli Comm,

8, Howardvanneshiek Camn.

DllevHampton

4

,

f .11m

O.1

.1i

9

Ves

t tin

ur q-c

[1-;

eelu

min

JO

3FA

YE

TT

E C

OU

NT

YT

OW

A

scale: k

"= 1 ni.

or

Not in a High School

District as of August 30, 1963

1.

Turkey Valley Comm.

2.

North Fayette County Comm.

3.

Postville Comm,

4,

Sumner Comm.

5.

Valley Comm.

6.

Starmont Comm.

7.

Wapsie Valley Comm.

8.

Oelwein Comm.

9.

West Central Comm.

10.

Fayette Comm.

CLA

YT

ON

CO

UN

TY

IOW

A

scal

e :

"=

1 a

.ip

mE

mirm

wm

iww

ww

wm

ill

or .


as of August 30, 1963

1.

Mar-Nkc COIE6

2.

Garnavillo Ccem4

3.

Postville Comm.

4.

M F L Comm.

5.

Valley Comm.

6.Starmont Conn.

7.

Central Comm.

8.

Edgewood-Colesburg Comm.

9.

Guttenberg Comm.

II ACC

Winnebago, Worth, MitchellHancock, Cerro Gordo, Floyd

Wright, Franklin, Butler

WINNEBAGO COUNTYIOWA

scale.: to = l.mi.


1. Forest City Com.2. Woden-Crystal Lake Comm.

3. Buffalo Center Comm.

4. Thompson Comm.

5. Lake Mills Comm.6. Rake Comm.

orest City

WORTH COUNTYIOWA

Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. St. AnsgsrsGrafton Comm.2. Northwood-Kensett Comm.

3. North Central Comm.4. Nora Springs4tock Falls Comm5. Lake Mills Comm.6. Forest City CCUU6

"4.

2 LjNorthidooct .1\

MITCHELL COUNTY

scale I .14 mi.

or Not in a High School District as of August 309 1963

1. St. Ansgar.Grafton Coon.2. Osage C 011111.

3. Riceville Cam%4. Nora Springe-Rook Falls Comm.5. Rudd-Rockford-Marble Rock Com.

Osage

NANCOCK COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

In an Independent or Ccmsolidated High School District

1. Forest City-Leland Comm. 6. Klemme Comm.

2. Woden-Crystal Lake Comm. 7. Meeervey Thornton Com.

3. Britt Ccom6 8. Belmond Comm.

4. Garner-Hayfield Comm, 9. Kanawha Comm.

5. Ventura Comm. 10. Corwith Wesley Comm.

Lt

LA/KW

Luv

mT

I 01

A/A

scale: i'=1

i. 3

iff

441

or. Not in a High

School


In an Independent or Consolidated

High School District

1.

Ventura Ccum.

2.

Nbservey Thornton Comm.

3.

North Central Comm.

4.

Nora Springs-Rock:Falls Comm.

5.

Rudd...Rockford-Marble 11001C Cam,

6.

Forest City-Leland COM.

7.

Sheffield-Chapin Com,

8.

Rockwell-Zwaledale Comm,

9.

Clear Lake Comm.

10.

Nnson City Ind.

FL OYD COUNTYIOWA

scale: = 1 Ini


1. Charles City Comm.

2. Osage COU06

3. Nashua Comm4. Nora Springs-Rock:Falls Comm.

5. Rudd.Rockford-Marb1e Rock:Comm.

6. Greene Comm.

A2

WRIGHT COUNTYlotttom

scialv Aft= A giIn an Independent or

1. Eagle Grove Comm.2. Goldfield Comm.3. Boone Valley Comm.

4. Helmond Coma.5. N6servey Thornton Comm.

Consolated High School District6. Cal. Comm,7. Dove Conel.

8. Northeast Hamilton Comm.

9. Webster City Comm.

10. Clarion Ind.

FRANKLIN COUNTYI OWA

scale: -I. " = 1 mi.


1. Cal Comm.2. Meservey Thornton Comm.

3. Helmond Comm.

4. Dows Comm.5. Alden Comm.

6. Iowa Falls Comm.

7. Sheffield-Chapin Comm.8. Ackley Geneva Com.9. Hampton Comm.

10. Dumont Comm.

2

1

5 6

7

9

ampton

8

sa

BUTLER COUNTY

9,14:,°##!: l 4aNot in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

In an Independent or Consolidated High School District

1. Nashua Comm.2. Plainfield Comm3. Clarksville C.4. Waverly-Shell Rock Comm.5. Allison-Bristow Calm,

6. Aplington Coon.7. Aokley Um.8. Parkersburg Comm.9. Dumont Comm.

10. Greene Coal.U. New Hartford Con.

III ACC

Dickinson, Emmet, KossuthClay, Palo Alto

DICKI NSON COUNTYlOwA

scale: tlmi.4111=1111111MIg



1. Lakn Park COMM.

2. Spirit Lake Comm.

3. gstherville Conn'.

4. Terril Comm.

5. Milford Coon.

6. Everly Comm.

7. Arnolds Park Con.

EMMET COUNTYKMA

scale: " = 1 mi.

11111,11111rII

0 or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963


1. Armstrong Comm.

2. Lincoln Central Comm,

3. Estherville Comm.

4. Terril Comm.

5. Graettinger Comm.

6. Ringsted Ind.

KOSSOTH COUNTY

(NORTH)IOVVA

scale: " = 1 mi.



1. Armstrong Cam. 4. Buffalo Center Comm.

2. Svea City Comm. 5. Burt Comm.

3. Ledyard Comm. 6. Algona Comm.

MENNEN,

KOSSUTH COUNTY

(5004)IOWA

scale: " = Mi.

7. Sentra]. Com. 10. West Bend Comm.

8. CorwithWeeley C 11. Titonka Con,

9. Lu Verne C Olna 12. Lakota Con.

7--,

CLAY COUNTYOWA

scale: -;lin = 1 mi.irmrmrs111or Not in a High School District as

In an Independent or Consolidated1. Sioux Rapids Comm. 7.

2. South Clay Comm. 8

3. Ruthven Cons.

4. Terril Comm.

5. Milford Comm.6. Everly Comm.

of August 30, 1963

,-;11 School District

Hartley C.Spencer Comm.Royal Comm.Sutherland Comm.Sioux Valley Comm.Greenvelle.aossie Con.

Spencer

9

.10 1

Or

Rs:

PALO ALTO COUNTYOWA

scale: t" = 1 mi.


In an Independent or Consolidated High School District.

1. West Bend COMM.2. *lizard Comm.3. Ruthven Ccns.4. Terril Comm.

5. Graettinger Comm.

6. Emmetsburg CCON67. Sentral Comm8. Cylinder Con.9. Ayrshire Con.

Ertunetsbur

2

IV AVS

Lyon, OsceolaSioux, O'Brien

LYO

N C

OU

NT

YIO

WA

scale:

= 1

mi.

or

Not in a HighSchool District as

of August 30, 1963

1.

West Lyon Comm.

2.

Central Lyon Comm.

3.

Little Rock Corm.

4.

Sheldon Comm.

5.

George Comm.

6.BoydenHull Comm.

7.

Rock Valley Coma.

1

Roc

k

Rap

1c16

,rr

i

NNW

05CEOL A COUNTYlay4A

scapar_14.41,14 mi.


1. Harris Comma

2. Ocheyedan Comm.

3. Little Rock Comm.

4. Sheldon Comm.

5. Melvin Comm.

6. Hartley Comm.

7. Sibley Ind.

S IO

UX

CO

UN

TY

IOW

A

j

or

Not in a High School District as of August 309 1963

1.

West liyon Comm.

6.

Boyden-Hull Comm'.

scale:

"= 1 mi.

2.

Mhurice-Orange City Comm.

7.

Rock Valley Come

3.

Floyd Valley Comm.

8,

Sioux Center Count.

1..1

.1,9

110

4.

Sheldon Com,,

9.

West Sioux Comm.

5.

Georg. Comm.

9

S)o

ux8

ICen

ter

Ora

nge

Eli)

Citt

i

4

VIIM

1111

1

O'BRI EN COUN TYOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.


1. Sutherland Comm.

2. Paullina Comm.

3. Floyd Valley Comm.

4, Sheldon Comm.5. Melvin Comm.

6. Hartley Comm.7. Sanborn Comm.

8. Primghar Comm.9. Lverly Comm.10. Royal Comm.

V ACC

Buena Vista, Pocahontas, HumboldtWright, Sac, Calhoun

Webster, Hamilton, Carroll, Greene

BUENA VISTA COUNTYI OWA

scale: " = 1 mi.


K1 In an Independent or Consolidated High School District1. Sioux Valley Comm.2. Sioux Rapids Comm.3. Albert City-Truesdale Comm.4. Newell-Providence Comm.5. Storm Lake Comm.6. Schaller Comm.

7. Aurelia Comm.8. Alta Comm.9. Galva Comm.

10. Marathon Com.11. Rembrandt Con.

POCAHONTAS COUNTYIOWA

seals: * = 1 mi.WIIIM11=11.12IplIpMi

or Not in a High School District as oft August 30, 1963

an Independent or Consolidated High School District

1. Laurens Comm.2. Havelock-Plover Comm.3. Rolfe COON6

4. West Bend Comm5. Gilmore City-Bradgate

6. Hinson Comm7. Fonda Comm.8. Pocahontas Comm.

9. Pomeroy Comm.10. Palmer Con.

P.IUM BOLDT COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.

1. Eagle Grove Comm.

2. Goldfield Comm.

3. Boone Valley Comm,

4, LuVerne Comm.

5, Twin Rivers Comm.

6. West Bend Comm.

7. Rolfe Comm.

8, Gilmore City-Bradgate

9. Humboldt Comm.

1.2.

3.

4.5.

WRIGHT COUNTYIOWA

setalV V= A vi

In an Independent or Consolated High School District

Eagle Grove Comm. 6. Cal. UM.Goldfield Comm. 7. Dove COMM.

Boone Valley Comm. 8. Northeast Hamilton Comm.

Helmond Comm. 9. Webster City Comm.

Meservey Thornton Com. 10. Clarion Ind.

t9

SAC COUNTYI OWA

scale: = 1 Mi.

1. Denison Cam, 7. Newell-Providence

2. OdebolUArthur COM. 8. Sac Comm.

3. Galva Comm. 9. Lytton Comm.

4. Schaller Ccusi. 10. Lake View-Auburn Comm.

5. Storm Lake Comm. 11. Wall Lake Comm.

6. Crestland Comm.

r-13

CALHOUN COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.

Or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1.2.

3.

4.


Lake City Comm.Lohrville Comm.Cedar Valley Comm.Manson Comm.

5. Pomeroy Comm.6. Rockwell City Comm.7. Lytton Comm.8. Fonda Comm.

1

RockwellCtiv

>Er Not in a High SchoolDayton C.Prairie Comm,Cedar Valley C.Northwest Webster Com.Gilmore CityHradgateHumboldt Comm.

WEBSTER COUNTYIOWA

scale: * = 1 mi.

District as of August 301 19637, Eagle Grove Comm.8. Fort Dodge Comm.9, Central Webster C.

10. Webster City Comm.U. Stratford CCUE6

4

9

1-IAMILTON COUNTYIOWA

scale: + 1 = 1 mi.

1. Webster City Comm.

2. Northeast Hamilton Comm.

3. Radcliffe Comm.

4. Roland Comm.

rmm'irmIp..mme5. Story City C00114

6. South Hamilton Comm.

7. Stratford Comm.

C ARROL L C OUN TYIONNA

scale: * = 1 mi.IIMfmarMIINIF11


In an Independent or, Consolidated High School District

1. GliddenAalstan COM.2. Coon Rapids Comm.

3. Nanning COM%

4. Ar-We-Ma Commi.

5. Carroll Ind.

GREENE COUNTYlovA

scale: t " = 1 mi.ip.m.1191111.1



1. Glidden-Ralston Coma.2. Chu Aan Conn.3. Jefferson Can.4. East Greene Com.

5. Yale-Jamaica-Bagley Cam.6. Bayard C.7. Coon Rapids Cam8. Scranton Con.

VI ACC

Hardin, Grundy, TamaMarshall, Jasper, Poweshiek

HARDIN COUNTYOWA

S5.alfp 7 1dai.

1. Nesco Comm. 7, Iowa Falls Comm.

2. New Providence Comm. 8. Owasa COU06

3. Union Whitten Comm, 9, Alden Comm.

4. Eldora Comm. 10. Radcliffe Ccum.

5. Steamboat Rock Comm. 11. Hubbard Comm.

6. Ackler-Geneva Comm. 12. Roland Comm.

10

9 I

)27 LI-T8

lavaFalls -FL

11

(

rEldoret

GRUNDY COUNTYOWA

scale: -tar.

Or Not in a High School District as of August 30; 1963


1. Grundy Center Comm,

2. Beaman-Conrad Comm.

3. Union-Whitten Comm.

4. Eldora Comm.

5. Wellsburg Comm.

6. Aplington COWL7. ACklerGeneVa COEM68. Parkersburg Comm.

9. Dike COMM10. Reinbeck Can.

r6 7

403

L11

IOW

A

scal

e: i

' = 1

mi.

......

......

.,or

. .N

ot in

a H

igh

Scho

olD

istr

ict a

s of

Aug

ust 3

0, 1

963

In=

Ind

epen

dent

or

Con

solid

ated

Hig

h Sc

hool

Dis

tric

t

1.So

uth

Tam

C.

2.B

ells

Pla

ine

C.

3.D

ysar

t C.

4. T

raer

-Clu

tier

Cal

m

5.H

einb

sok

Con

.

6.G

ladb

rook

C.

7.G

arvi

n C

osa,

8.L

D 1

P C

an.

9.G

ilman

C.

10.

Gru

ndy

Cen

ter

Com

.

11.

Gen

eseo

Can

.

MARSHALL COUNTYICAA0

seile) ".= mi.



1. Nesco Com. 5. Beaman-Conrad Comm. 9. Gilman Comm.2. New Providence Comm. 6. Gledbrook Com. 10. Collins Comm.3. Clemons Comm. 7. Marshalltown Coma. 11. West Ittrahan C.44 Iowa Falls Comm. 8. L D F Comm. 12. Green Mountain Ind.

42

10

11

JASP

ER

CO

OM

I O

WA

scsa

lr;I

ii=1

mi.

3.

1,M

ingo

Con

n.2,

Col

fax

Com

m.

or.

Not

in a

Hig

h Sc

hool

Sout

heas

t Pol

k C

4.Pr

airi

e C

ity C

am.

9.5.

New

140

=08

Con

.6.

Pella

Com

m.

11.

7.L

ynnv

ille-

Sully

Com

m.

12.a.

Dis

tric

t as

of A

ugus

t 30,

1963

Gri

nnel

l-N

ewbu

rg C

oin.

New

ton

Com

m.

Bax

ter

Com

m.

Col

lins

Com

a.B

ondu

rant

-Far

rar

Com

m.

POVESHIEK COUNTYIOWA

scale; + = I mi.

1. South Tama County Comm. 7. Montezuma Cam2. Belle Plaine Comm, 8. Lynnville-Sully Com,3. H L V Comm. 9, Gilman Comm,

4. Deep River-tellereburg 10. Grinnell-Newburg Cow.5, Tri County Comm. 11. Brooklyn-Guerneepaaloolm6. North 14zhailla Comm.

.10

Grmffe 11

8

--1 r

-

VII AVS

Bremer, Butler Black HawkGrundy, Buchanan, Tama

BRE MER COUNTYI OWA

01911911...","

scale: 1 mi. = "i41

(I) or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

In an Independent or Consolidated Hi7h School District

1. Waverly-Shell Rock Comm.

2, Plainfield Comm.

3. Nashua Comm.

4. Tripoli Comm.

5. Fredericksburg Comm.

6. Wapsie Valley Comm.

7. Denver Comm.

8. Janesville Con.

BUTLER COUNTYlowAr 14mi,


In an Indeperdent or Consolidated High School District

1. Nashua COUN62. Plainfield Cowin.

3. Clarksville Conn.

4. Waverly-Shell Rock Coon.5. Allison-Bristow Coim.

6. Aplington Comm.7. Ackley Coon.8. Parkersburg Comm.9. Dumont Comm.

10. Greene Com.U. New Hartford Con.

BLACK I-4/04K COUNTYIOWA

scale: * " = 1 mi.



61. Reinbeck C.2. Hudson Comm.

3. VAterloo4. La Porte City Comm.

5. Dunkerton Com.

Wapsie Valley Coimn.7. Denver Cosa.8. Cedar Falls Can.9. Dike Comm.

GRUNDY COUNTYOWA

scae: +11= 1 mi.



1. Grundy Center Comm.2. Heaman-Conrad Com.3. Union-Whitten Comm.

4. Eldora Comm.5. Wellsburg Comm.

6. Aplington Comm.7. Ackley.Geneva Calm.8. Parkersburg Comm.9. Dike Comm.

10. Reinbeck Comm.

BUCHANAN awryOWA

scale: i" = 1 mi.


1. Oelwein Comm.2. East Buchanan Comm.3. Starmont Comm,4. Jesup Comm.5. Wapsie Valley Comm.6. Independence Ind.

5

9

Tol

edo

ra

N.4

I O

WA

scal

e s

= 1

mi.

orN

ot in

a H

igh

Scho

olD

istr

ict a

s of

Aug

ust 3

0, 1

%3

In a

m I

ndep

ende

nt o

r C

onso

lidat

edH

igh

Scho

ol D

istr

ict

1.So

uth

Tan

a C

.

2.B

elle

Pla

ine

Cam

.

3.D

ysar

t C.

4. T

raer

.Clu

tier

Cam

.

5.R

einb

eck

Com

.

6.G

ladb

rook

Cam

.

7.G

arvi

n C

an.

N.

L D

?C

omm

.

9.G

ilman

Cal

m.

10.

Gru

ndy

Cen

ter

Cal

m

11.

Gen

oseo

Con

.

Delaware, Dubuque, Jackson

DEL AWA R E C OUNTYI OWA

scaltWITZ:71 ai.

Not in a High School District _a of August 30, 1963

1. Edgewood(Colesburg) Caw.2, Western Dubuque Coml.3. Monticello Com.4. Miquoketa Valley Coon.

5. Coggon Corn.6. West Delaware Conn.7. Starmont Comb

1.

nchaster

1111.

4

2

orN

ot in

a H

igh

Scho

olD

istr

ict a

s of

Aug

ust 3

09 1

963

1.D

ubuq

ue C

omm

.

2.W

este

rnDub live Count.

3.

Mon

ticel

lo C

om.

JAC

KS

ON

CO

UN

TY

low

A

scale:

i" = 1 mi.

Not in a High SchoolDistrict as of August 30, 1963

In an Independent orConsolidated High SchoolDistrict

1.

Bellevue Cammi.

2.

Western Dubuque laum

3.

Maquoketa Comm.

4.Andrew Coon.

5.

Preston Con.

6.

Miles Comm.

7.

Sabula Commt.

r

IX ACC

Clinton, Cedar, ScottMuscatine, Louisa

,1, ... .4.

CLI

NT

ON

CO

UN

TY

IOW

A

Bel

le?

".=

mi.

cs:1011600Not

in a High School

In an Independent or

1.

Lost Nation Comm.

2.

Delwood Comm.

3.

Northeast C.

44

Miles Comm.

5.

Sabula C.


Consolidated High School District

6.

Clinton Comm.

7.

Camanche Comm.

8.

Central Clinton Comm.

9.

Calamus C.

10.

Wheatland Comm.

CEDAR COUNTY

scaletC11! 1 mi.

0 or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963


1. Wilton Comm,

2. Durant Comm.

3. Bennett Com.4. Clarence Comm.

5. Lincoln Comm.

6. Tipton Comm.

7. West Branch Comm.

8. West Liberty Comm.

9. Lowden Comm.

SCOTT COUNTYIOWA

=.1 fa*


1. North Scott Comm.2. Bettendorf Conn.3. Davenport Comm.4. Bluegrass Comm.5. Walcott Comm.

6. Durant Conn.7. Bennett C onss.

8. Wheatland Conn.9. Le Claire Tic.

10. Pleasant Valley Tim.

2 Jo

efferui rf

MUSCATINE COUNTYIOWA

scale: * in. = 1 mi

or Not ia a High School District as of August 30, 1963

Columbus Ccum.

2. Loulsa-Mhscatine Comm.

3. Mhscatine Comm.

4. Bluegrass Comm.

5. Walcott Comm.

6. Durant C am.

7. Wilton Can.

8. West Liberty Com.

9. Area No. 6 Comm.

aseahne

LOUISA COUNTYIOWA

scale: I in. = 1 mi.

Not in a High School District us of August 30, 1963

1. Lone Tree Comm. 5. Kiediapolis Comm.

2. Columbus Comm. 6. Wapello Comm.

3, Winfield-Mt, Union Comm. 7. Louisa-Moscatine Comm.

4. Mbrning Sun CO0104

Benton, Linn, JonesCedar, Iowa, Johnson

Clinton, Keokuk, Washington

BE

NIR

I O

U/A

scal

e: *

in. =

1 a

i.

orN

ot in

a H

igh

Scho

olD

istr

ict a

s of

Aug

ust 3

0,19

63

In a

n In

depe

nden

t or

Con

soli-

date

d H

igh

Scho

ol D

istr

ict

1. V

into

n C

oma.

2. B

ells

Pla

ine

Cam

,

3. Urbana Con.

4,

Shel

lsbu

rg C

on.

5. N

ewha

ll C

on.

6. N

orw

ay C

on.

7. V

an H

orne

Con

.

8, K

eyst

one

Con

.

9. G

arri

son

Con

.

.

L IN

N C

OU

NT

YIOWA

scale

Not in a High SchoolDistrict

as of August 30,

1963

In an Independent orConsolidated

High SchoolDistrict

1.

Coggan Comm.

2. Alburnett Cenni.

3,

*trice Rural Comm.

4.

Cedar Rapids Comm.

5.

College Comm.

6.

Solon C.

7.

*rant Vernon Comm

8.

Springville Comm.

9,

Central City Comm.

10.

Anamosa Comn4

11.

Monticello C.

12.

Troy Male Con.

13.

Walker Con.

14.

Center Point Cons

15.

Nbrion Ind.

16.

Lisbon Con.

JONES COUNWIOWA

80411,424.*


5. Lincoln Comm.

6. Olin Con.

7. Oxford Minction Con.

1. Mimosa Com.

2. Monticello COM.

3. Midland Coma.

,

CEDAR COO) TY

scalel:ICV! 1 mi.



Tipton Comm .

West Branch Comm.West Liberty Comm

9, Lowden Comm.

1. Wilton Comm.2, Durant Comm.

3. Bennett Com.4e Clarence COM.5. Lincoln Comm.

6.

7.8.

IOWA COUNTYiowA

scale: * " = mi.111111111,,



1. H L V C. 4. Williamsburg Comm 7. English Valleys Comm.2. Belle Plaine Comm. 5. Clear Creek Coimn. 8. Tri County Coma.3. Iowa Valley Com. 6. Mid Prairie Comm. 9. Deep River-Millersburg

3

UI

It

1.L

one

Tre

e C

am.

2.Io

wa

City

C.

3.W

illia

msb

urg

C.

4.C

lear

Cre

ek C

omm

.5.

Col

lege

C.

6.So

lon

Cam

.7.

Wes

t Bra

nch

Cam

.8.

Wes

t Lib

erty

Cos

i.

-

CL

INT

ON

CO

UN

TY

IOW

A

ocia

n_42

1.,a

_lcs:2g5t3Not

in a High School

In an Independent or

1.

Loot Nation COMM.

2.

Delvood Comm.

3.

Northeast Comm.

4.

Miles Comm.

5.

Sabula C.



6.Clinton Cam.

7.

Comanche Comm.

8.

Central Clinton Comm.

9.

Galax= Comm.

10.

Wheatland Comm.

KEOKUK COOI OWA

scale: k=IllrI'IMENIMVEN10

eor Not in a High School District a

In an Independent or Consolid

1. Tri County Comm.2, English Valleys Comm.

3. Keota COUU6

s of August 30. 1963

ted High School District

4. Sigourney Comm.

5. Pekin COMM.6. Hedrick:Com.

WASHINGTON COUN TYI OWA

scale: " = 1 mi.


1. Soot& Com.2. 14id Prairie Comnu3. Washington Comm.4. Waoo Com.5. Highland Comm.

3viashi rtston

- . -

XI ACC

Boone, Story, GuthrieDallas, Polk, Jasper

Adair, Madison, WarrenMarion, Mahaska

4

A

BOONE COUNTYI OWA

scale: +" 1 mi.


In an Independent ord C.

2. Stratford Ccom.3, Story city Comm.

le. Gilbert Comm.

5. United Calm.6, Ballard C.

Consolidated High School District7. Woodward Comm,8. Ogden Comm.

9. Boone Comm.

10. East Greene Comm.11. Madrid Ind.

1. Ballard Coin.2, North Polk Ccars.3. Maxwell Como4, Conine C.5, West Marshall C.6. Colo Com.7. Nesse C.

S TORY COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 a.gIMINI.1.11111111

8. Roland COM%9. Story City Com.

10. Gilbert Cam11. United Conn.12. hues COM*13. Nevada Com.

9

ID

Ames12

1

DA4,4det

M

GUTHRIE COUNTYIOWA

scale: * in. = 1 mi.


1. Coon Rapids Comm.2. Bayard Comm.3. Yale-Jamaica-Bagley Comm.4. Panora-Linden Comm.5. Dexfield Comm.

10

117

1

6. Stuart Coimn.7. Menlo Comm.8. Adair-Casey Comm.9. Guthrie Center Comm.

10. Audubon Comm.11. Exira Cow.

IMP

DALLAS COUNTYiC4,444

scale: * in. = 1 mi.


1. Earlham Comm.2. Adel Comm.3. Van Meter Comm.44 West Des Moines Comm'.5. Waukee Comm,6. Dallas Center Cow.

7. Woodward Comm.Co Central Dallas COMM.9. Perry Cass.

10. Panora-Linden Com.11. De:field COMM'.

POLK COUNTYOWA

scales e = 1 mi.


1. Ballard Comm.2. North Polk Comm.

3. Nhxwell Gomm.

4. Bondurant4Parrar Can,

5. Ankeny Comm.6. Southeast Polk Comm.

7. Des Mbines Ind. Comm.8, West Des Moines Gomm.

9. Urbandale Comm.10. Johnston Con.11. Saydel Com.

7

JAS

PE

R C

OU

NT

YIO

WA

scal

7-1-

1 1e

mi.

1.M

ingo

C.

2.C

olfa

x C

oon.

or. N

ot in

a H

igh

Sch

ool

3.S

outh

east

Pol

k C

osa.

8.4.

Pra

irie

City

con

ga.

9.5.

New

Mon

roe

C.

10.

6.P

ella

Con

n.U

.7.

Lynn

ville

-Sul

ly C

asa

12.

Dis

tric

tas

of A

ugus

t 30,

196

3

Grin

nell-

New

burg

Com

mN

ewto

nC

am.

Bax

ter

CO

M.

Col

lins

Com

.B

ondu

rant

-Par

rar

Cam

p.

12

9

New

ton

rU

7

ADAIR COUNTYIOWA

Or Not in a High

1. Adair-Casey Comm.2. Mnlo COMM.3. Stuart Comm.

scale: " = 1 mi.

School District as of August 30, 1963

I.. Greenfield Com5. Orient.aicksburg COMM.6. Bridgevater-Fontanelle

1 2

4Greenfteld

Qor

MADISON COUNTYIOWA

scale: ini= 1 mi.

k



1. Orient Hhcksburg COUE6

2. Winterset Comm.3, East Union Cam.

4. Interstate 35 Comm.

5. Nhrtensdale-St, Mnryle C.6. Van *ter C.70 Ear lhan C.8. Greenfield Conn.

WARREN COONTYIOWA

scale: * " = 1 mi.

..mmv....mgormilmj


1. Indianola Coma.

2. Pleasantville Coma.

South East Warren Co.

5. )41rtensdaleSt. Marys Cosal.

6. Des Moines Ind. Comm.

7. Norwalk Con.

8. Carlisle Con.

MARION COUNTYIOWA


1. HacheruDallas C.2. Pleasantville Comm.3, Southeast Polk Comm.4. Prairie City Com.

5. New Miro. Com.6. Pella Cosa,7. Knoxville Count.A. Twin Cedars Com.

Mir

MAHMKA COUNTYIOWA

scale: * " = 1 mi.

In an Independent

1. Oskaloosa Comm.2. Eddyville Comm.

3. Twin Cedars Comm.

4. Pella Comm.

or Consolidated High School District

5. Lynnville-Sully Comm.6. North Mahaska Comm.7. Tri County Comm.8. Fremont Ind.

XII AVS

Plymouth, Cherokee, WoodburyIda, Monona, Crawford

PLN mouTH couNnY(EAST)

IOWAscale: " = 1 mi.

5. Lawton Comm.6. Hinton Comm.7. Westfield Comm.

Le Mars

8. Akron Comm.

9. West Slow, Comm.

c2s

3

PLYMOUTH COUNTY(WEST)

IOWAscale: " = 1 mi.

emommmienrrmr

or Not in a High School District as jot August 30, 1963


1. Le Mars Comm. 3. *kraus Conn.4. Kingsley-Pierson Comm.2. Remsen-Union Comm.

8

CHEROKEE COUNTYIOWA

scale: i" = 1 mi.


an Independent or Consolidated High School District6. MbridenuCleghorn Comm.

7. Aurelia COML.8, klta C OM.9, Galva Comm.

10. Holstein Comm.

11. Cherokee Ind.

utherland Comm.2. Paullina Ccum.

3. Marcus Comm.

4. Kingsley.Pierson Comm.

5. Willow Cam.

1#

2

GNP

5.

6.7.8.

WOODBURY COUNTY(E AST)IOWA

scale: = 1 mi.

Battle Creek Comm. 9.

Mhple Valley Comm. 10.

Westwood Comm. 11.

Sergeant BluffLuton Comm. 12.

Bronson Comm.Sioux City Ind.Correctionville Ind.Cushing Con.

WOODBURY COUNTY(WEST)

I OWII4scale: = 1 mi.


In an Independent or Consolidated Nigh School District

1. Lawton Comm. 3. Kingsley-Pierson Comm.

2. Woodbury Central Comm. 4. Anthon-Cto COME6

IDA COUNTY1 OWA

scale: in = 1 mi.


1. Ida Grove Comm.Odebolt.Arthur Comm.

3. Galva Comm.

4. Schaller Comm.

5. Holstein Comm.

6. Willow Comm.

7. Battle Creek:Comm.

8. Mhple Valley Comm.

9. Schleswig Comm.

ickt Grove

4

MO

NO

NA

CO

UN

TY

lorm

ensc

etmi.

or


1.

East Monona Comm.

6.

Maple Valley Comm.

2,

Woodbine COMM.

7.

Westwood Comm.

3.

Dunlap CCUO6

8.

Whiting Comm.

4,

Charter Oak Comm.

9.

West Nbnona Commi.

5.

Castana Comm.

10.

West Harrison Comm.

7

Ona

took

9

5

Bade

=1

id.

e.

INI4or

Not in a High School District as of Augunt 30, 13

Lila an Independent or


1.A

r-W

e-V

a C

oma.

5.D

ow C

ity-A

rlon

C.

2,

Nhnning Com,

6.

Charter OakpAte C.

3.

Manilla C.

7.

Schleswig Cam.

4,

Denison C.

8.

Battle Creek C.

Der

ooD

XIII ACC

Harrison, Shelby, AudubonGuthrie, Pottawattamie, Cass

Mills, Fremont, Page

v

or.

"n"

6su

lOW

° 11

%A

.0%

.1

IOW

Asc

ale:

*11

= 1

mi.

Not

in a

Hig

h Sc

hool

Dis

tric

t as

of A

ugus

t 30,

196

3

In a

n In

depe

nden

t or

Con

solid

ated

Hig

h Sc

hool

Dis

tric

t

1.D

unla

p C

am.

2.W

oodb

ine

C.

3.T

ri C

ente

r C

oma.

4.L

ogan

-Mag

nolia

Coo

n.

5.W

est H

arri

son

CO

MM

.

6.M

isso

uri V

alle

y In

d.

SHELBY COUNTYIOWA

scale: " 1 mi.


1. Elk HornAimballton Cosa.

2, Irwin Come3. Manning Cal01.

4. Manilla C00111.

5. Dow Citparion Comm.

6 Harlan Comm.

7, Shelby COUNI.

8. Avdha Comm.9, Walnut COMM.

AUDUBON COUNTYIOWA

scale: I " = 1 mi.


1. Nanning Com

2. Audubon Ccin.

3. Coon Rapids Comm

44 Exira Corn.

5. Anita Ccuat.

6. Elk HornpKimba llton Ovum

Audubon

d_us. I

IMP

or.

GUTHRIE COUNTYI OWA

scale: * in. = 1 mi.Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Coon Rapids Comm.2. Bayard Coon.3. Yale-Jamaica-Bagley Conn.4. Panora-Linden Comm.5. Dexfield Conn.

6. Stuart Com.7. Menlo COMO.8. Adair-Casey Comm.9. Guthrie Center Comm.

10. Audubon Comm.U. Exira Com.

61110...

POTTAWATTAMIE COUN1N(WEST)IOW A

scale: -in = 1 mi.1111111WMIrMIrpIN.

or. Not in a High School District as of August 309 1963


1. Walnut C.2. Avoha Comm.

3. Tri Center Comm.

4. Underwood Conan.

5, Lewis Central Comm.

6. Treynor Comm.

POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY(EAST)IOWA

scale: in = 1 mi.irm19,071111Mg

7. Carson-awedonia Coma. 10. Atlantic Comm.8. Red Oak COMM. 11. Oakland Ind,9. Griswold Comm. 12, Council Bluffs Ind.

ts

CASS COUNTYIOWA

scale: = i mi.



1. Anita Calm

2. C and M Coma.

3. Griswold Comm.

4

Atioentic.

4. Atlantic Com,

5. Walnut Comm.

2

MILLS COUNTYIOWA

scale: = 1 mi.

1. Lewis Central Comm,

2. Glenwood Comm.

3. Malvern Comm.

4. Niehna Valley Comm.

5. Shenandoah Comm.

6. Fremont Mille Comm,

MIC.1%71:474.7II7ReAa

2

EDGIenwood

FREMONT COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.

and/or Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Hamburg Comm.

2. Farragut Comm.

3, Shenandoah Comm.

44 Fremont Mills Comm'.

5. Sidney Camm.

4.

5 Sidne4

1.

11.

PAGE COUNTYI OWA

scale: * in. = 1 al.



Villieft COU06

2. Clarinda COM,

Shenandoah COM.3.

4. South Page C.

5. New Hirket Comm.

6. Essex Ind.

XIV ACC

Adair, Adams, UnionClarke, Montgomery, Taylor

Ringgold, Decatur

Or

ADAIR COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = RioIPmTr.19

Not in a Nigh School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Adair-Casy Can 4. Greenfield Coma.

2. tbnlo C. 5. 0rient.NacksbusgCCON4

3. Stuart Coma. 6. Bridgewater-Fontanelle

Clenfiefild

ADAMS COUNTYIOWA

Beale: i " = 1 mj .fmmimir""m11

or Not in a High Sohool District as of August 30, 1963

1. Villisca Comm,

2. Griswold Comm.

3. Corning Comm.

4. Prescott Comm.

5. Orient-Mhcksburg Comm.

6. Lenta: Comm.

UNION COUNTYIOWA

scale : 1 " = 1 mi.

.--.--.--7-1

Not in a High Sohool District as of August 30, 1963

1. Orient.Macksburg Capin.

2. Creston Cam.

3. East Union Comm,

4. Murray Com,

5. Lenox Come

CLARKE COONTYIov/A

scale: " = 1 mi.

or 'Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. East Union C. 4. Grand Valley Comm.

2. Interstate 35 Com. 5. Clarke Comm,

3. Murray Carol 6. Mormon Trail Com.

MONTGOMERY COUNTYI OWA

scale: =



4. Nishna Valley Coma.

5. Stanton Ind.

1. Villisoa Com.

2. Griswold Comm.

3. Red Oak Comm.

TAYLOR COUNVIOWA

scale: " = 1 mile


1. Villisca COUEL

2, New Mhrket Comm.

3. Corning COUE6

44 Lenox Cam

5. Clearfield Comm.

6. Bedford Comn.

MM.

L-

RINGGOLD COUNTYIOWA

scale: -1- " = 1 mi.,............,

1. Grand Valley Comm.

2. East Union Comm.

3. Diagonal Comm.

4. Lenox Comm.

5. Clearfield Comm.

6. Bedford Comm.

7. Mount Ayr Comm.

8. Lamoni Comm.

4,2J,

2 Lr-1-1

citlooni Ayr

7

i8

DEC ATUR COONITYI ()WA

scale: " = 1 mi.

IIrMir9111=M11

or Not in a Nigh School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Lamoni Comm. 4. Clarke Comm.

2. Grand Valley Coma.

3. Central Decatur C.

5. Mormon Trail Com.

6. A C L Can.

XV ACC

Mahaska, Keokuk, LucasMonroe, Wapello, Jefferson

Wayne, Appanoose, Davis, Van Buren

MAHMKA COUNTYIOWA

la an Independent

1. Oskaloosa Comm.2. Eddyville Comm.

3. Twin Cedars Comm.4. Pella Comm.

scale: * = 1 mi.

or Consolidated High School District

5. Lynnville-Sully Comm.6. North Mehaska Comm.7. Tri County Comm.8. Fremont Ind.

KEOKUK COUNTYIOWA

scale: 1 " = 1 mi.

Oor Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

NAN In an Independent or Consolidated High School District

1. Tri County Comm.2. English Valleys Comm.

3, Keota Coma.

44 Sigourney Comm.

5. Pekin Conn.6. Hedrick Con.

LUCAS COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.


1. Marmon Trail C.

2. Chariton Comm.

3 Russell C.

44 South East Warren

1

DChariton

sr)

MONROE COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.


1. Russell Comm.

2. Albia Comm.

3. Mbravia Comm.

4. Blakesburg Comm.

5. Eddyville Comm.

OAlbra

WA PEL LO COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.



1, Blakesburg Comm.

2. Ottumwa COMM.

3. Cardinal Comm.

4. Pekin COMM.

5. Sddyville Comm.

6. Fairfield Comm.

JEFFERSON COUNT(I OWA

scale: " = 1 mi.

rIIIIMMII:JE.11=1FM111

or. Not in a High School District as of August 30, 1963

1. Cardinal COMIL

2. Pekin C omm.

3. Fairfield Conn.

44 Van Buren COMM.

2

EL3Fatrfte

WAYNE COUNTYIOWA

scale: " = 1 mi.I IIMMM9 IMINNIFEEMMIrMI,


1. ACLComm.

2. Ssymour Cam.

3. Cambria-Corydon Comm.

4. Russell Comm.

5. Mrmon Trail Com.

rOkU

0

1. .15r

APPANOOSE COUNTYIOWA

scale: -.I. " = 1 mi.


1. Seymour Comm.2. Albia Comm.3, Moravia Comm.

4. MbultonUdell Comm.5, Centerville Ind.

DAVIS COUNWIOWA

scale: " = mi.


1. Davis Comm.

2. Hbultonadell Comm.

3. Moravia Como

4. Blakssburg COM.

5. Cardinal Comm.

6. Fox Valley Comm.

SNP

VAN BUREN COUNTYlomm

scale: " in 1 ale

111=11.111IrMINIM.IOM


1. Davis CCM.

2, Fox Valley COUIA.

3. Van Duren CO0116

4, Harmony Comm.

5. Fairfield Comm.

6. Cardinal Comm.

0

XVI ACC

Henry, Des Moines, Lee

HENRY COUNTYIOWA

scale: I in. = 1 mi.

Not in a High School District as of

August 30, 1963.

le Mt. Pleasant Com.2. Ulm Comm.

3. Winfield.M. Union Com.44 New Loudon Comm.

5, Danville Com.

ri MountPleasant

.3

DES MOINES COUNTYOWA

scale: + " = 1 si.

or Not in a High School District as of Augu2t 30, 1963In an Independent or Consolidated High School District

1. Burlington Comm. 6. Niediapolis C.2. Danville Comm. 7. Wapello Comm.

3. New London Comm. 8. Yarmouth Con.

4. Winfield-Mt. Union Comm. 9. West Burlington Ind.

5. Mbrning Sun Comm.4.

LEE

CO

UN

TY

1 O

WA

Beale:

*= 1 mi.

Not in a High School Districtas of

August 30, 1963

In an Independent or Consolidated

High

School District

1.

Fort Nhdison COMM

2. Central Lee COME6

3.

Keo

kuk

Com

m.

4.Van

Bur

enComm.

research and development vocational and technical 007 214 ... · problems of training, production...

Documents