research leadership in the clinical environment
TRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH LEADERSHIP IN
THE CLINICAL ENVIRONMENT
A/Professor Margaret Fry
Director Research and Practice Development NSLHD
Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health
University of Technology, Sydney
The forces and drivers active currently
within Health Services and Practice
New Directives Guidelines GL2012_004
Perform in a clinical leadership role evidenced by participation in
practice development activities, including mentoring, education,
active participation in communities of practice, policy development,
research and quality improvement (point 5 pg 7)
2
The forces and drivers active currently
within Health Services and Practice
Understanding the context
External drivers
Government Policy, Government focus, population focus, new
models of care
Internal drivers
Clinical needs, performance targets, IIMS, workforce issues,
budget, service delivery
Staff behaviour drivers
Values, beliefs, attitudes, motivation
3
The forces and drivers active within
Health Services and Practice
4
Examining and Exploring Practice
Clinical Inquiry:
Do we have what we think we should have to deliver services?
(resources, staff, knowledge, skills…?)
Are we doing what we (know we) ought to be doing? (are our care
processes aligned with „best practice‟?)
Are our patient outcomes as good as the evidence shows they can
be? Peer benchmarking; research evidence?
5
Audits: Structure, Process, Outcome
Clinical audits are a quality improvement process that seeks to improve
patient care and outcomes through systematic review of care against
explicit criteria and the implementation of change.
Aspects of the structure, processes, and outcomes of care are selected
and systematically evaluated against explicit criteria.
Outcome of audit: changes are implemented at an individual, team, or
service level and further monitoring is used to confirm improvement in
healthcare delivery.
(National Institute for Clinical Excellence)
6
Audits: Structure, Process, Outcome
Structures/ resources:
Do clinicians have adequate knowledge/skills?
Processes:
Effective discharge screening systems? Care planning process?
Referral processes?
Outcomes:
Pain management, QoL, reduce LOS, reduce re-admission, staff
satisfaction
7
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
8
Surveys, Observation of practice, Interviews
Extraction from other forms of existing data – EMR, pharmacy,
pathology, imaging, PACE records, IIMS, any HIE data…
Documentation reviews – case notes, management plans, observation charts,
medication charts ……
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
What are your service targets/goals ?
Gap analysis:
Awareness
Knowledge
Implementation
Values and commitment
9
Research Leadership in Health Services and Practice
How is pain managed in our ED?
Fry, M.., Holdgate, A., Baird, L., Silk, J., & Ahern, M. 1999, "An emergency department's analysis of pain management patterns", Australian Emergency Nursing Journal, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 31-36.
Fry, M. Holdgate A. 2002; Nurse initiated intravenous morphine in the emergency department: efficacy, rate of adverse events and impact on time to analgesia. Emergency Medicine 14(3):249-254.
Fry, M. Ryan, J.; and Alexander N 2004 Prospective Study of Nurse Initiated Panadeine Forte: Expanding Pain Management in the ED. Accident & Emergency Nursing 12(3):136-140.
Fry, M. Arendts, G. 2006 Factors Associated with Delay to Narcotic Analgesia in Emergency Departments. The Journal of Pain, 7(9) pp 682-686.
Can nurses improve waiting times ?
Fry, M. & Rogers T. Fry, M. & Rogers T. 2009 The Emergency Transitional Nurse Practitioner role: implementation study and preliminary evaluation Australasian Emergency nursing Australasian Emergency nursing In Press
Fry, M. Borg, A., Jackson, S., & McAlpine, A. 1999, "The advanced clinical nurse a new model of practice: meeting the challenge of peak activity periods", Australian Emergency Nursing Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 26-28.
Fry, M. & Jones K 2005 The clinical initiative nurse: Extending the role of the emergency nurse, who benefits?, Australian Emergency Nursing Journal 8(1-2): 9-12.
Who are the patients leaving prior to medical assessment?
Fry, M. Thompson, J.; Chan, A. 2004,Patients Regularly Leave Emergency Departments Before Medical Assessment: A Study of Did Not Wait Patients, Medical Profile and Outcome Characteristics. AENJ 6(2): 21-26. 10
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice Do Nurse Practitioners make a difference? Fry, M. and T. Rogers (2009). "The Transitional Emergency Nurse Practitioner role: implementation study
and preliminary evaluation." Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 12(2): 32-37.
Fry, M., J. Fong, et al. (2011). "A 12-month evaluation of the impact of Transitional Emergency Nurse
Practitioners in one metropolitan Emergency Department." Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
14(1): 4-8.
Luttze, M., A. Ratchford, et al. (2011). "A review of the Transitional Emergency Nurse Practitioner."
Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 14: 226-231.
Fry M. A systematic review of the impact of afterhours care models on emergency departments,
ambulance and general practice services. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal. 2011;14:217-25.
Fry M. Literature Review of the Impact of Nurse Practitioners in Critical Care services Nursing in Critical
Care. 2011;16(2):58-66.
What is the best technique for venipuncture?Dwyer, D., Fry, M., Sommerville, A., & Holdgate, A. 2006 A randomised, single blinded control trial of haemolysis rate comparing two cannula aspiration techniques. Emergency Medicine, 18(5/6), pp. 484-487.
The need to develop knowledge in ventilator /airway management: what is the evidence?Fry, M. & Kenny, C. 2000, "Ventilators in the ED: the ABC", Australian emergency nursing journal, 3(1) 6-10.
Fry, M. & Ruperto K. A 12 month retrospective study of airway management practices International Emergency Nursing. 2009;17(2):108
11
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice Can triage nurses stream patients ?
Holdgate A, Morris J, Fry M, Zecevic M. 2007 Accuracy of Triage Nurses in predicting patient disposition. Emergency Medicine, 19, pp. 341-345.
How are mental health patients triaged in an ED?
Fry, M. Brunero, S. 2005 The characteristics and outcomes of mental health patients presenting to an emergency department over a twelve month period. Australian emergency nursing journal. 7(2): 21-25.
De Guio, A., Bolten, C., Fry, M., Hudson, B., Karooz, A., Mellick, N., O'Brien, B., & Scott, L. 1999, training manual for non mental health trained staff to work with mental health patients in hospital emergency departments, NSW Health, Sydney, 1.
How can we improve the time to thrombolysis?
Chan, A., Davidson, P., Scheaffe, S., Fry, M.., Holdgate, A., & Mather, A. The quality improvement process: A mechanism to decrease time delay to thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine 1[1], 1. 1998.
What was the mortality rate for one ED?
Fry, M. & Rhodes-Sutton, A. 2005 A retrospective review of adult mortality characteristics of patients presenting to a metropolitan tertiary emergency department. Accident & Emergency Nursing 13(2): 122-125.
How can we improve the ED experience for different multicultural groups?
Fry, M. Ajami, A. Borg A. 2004, Bringing relevant information to diverse groups about emergency department services: The “BRIDGE” Project. Australian Emergency Nursing Journal 7(1): 19-22.
12
Research Leaders in Health Services and Practice
We introduce new practices but don‟t think to write it up!
Publishing makes Nursing and Midwifery visible:
Profiles service outcomes
You can provide evidence for system change and debate
Clarifies thought and structure for project/study
Builds capacity and a program of research for your career
Research in teams multidisciplinary collaboration
Interests/disciplines/agenda of team
Builds mutual respect
Nursing and Midwifery transparent and understood
13
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
To build/ develop/ explore/ change service you need to
understand culture and social processes
What is the existing culture?
Shared basic assumptions:
beliefs, values, rules, procedures and habits,
and tacit knowledge
14
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
Leaders need to examine and understand everyday culture in
order to implement new ways of doing things, and engage with
old or new values.
As a research leader and change agent how do you manage
change?
15
Research Leadership in Health
Services and Practice
As leaders you can influence certain things
“circle of influence‟
In the Circle of Concern the focus is on what we need to have in
order to be happy or successful: “I will be happy when my budget is
increased”; “If my boss would change his attitude my team‟s morale
would improve”; “If we had more staff...”.
Operating in the Circle of Influence focus on what they could be or
do: “I could be a better role model”; “I can be more organised”; “I
will take the boss a strategy for change”; “All our service will focus
on solutions rather than problems”.16
Circle of Concern
Circle of Influence
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
17
Leading Self
Leading
Upwards
Leading Sideways/ Peers
– internally
Leading Sideways/Peers
- externally
Leading
Downwards
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
1. Lead and manage yourself (50%)
The first and paramount responsibility is to manage self; one's own
integrity, character, ethics, knowledge, wisdom, temperament,
words, and acts.
Without management of self, no one is fit for authority, no matter
how much they acquire.
It is the management of self that should have half of our time and
the best of our ability. And when we do, the ethical, moral, and
spiritual elements of managing self are inescapable.
18
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
2. Lead and manage upwards (vertical) (25%)
The second responsibility is to manage those who have authority
over us: nurse managers, supervisors, medical directors, regulators,
ad infinitum.
Without their consent and support, how can we follow conviction,
exercise judgment, use creative ability, achieve constructive results,
or create conditions by which others can do the same?
Managing superiors is essential.
.
19
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
How do you manage superiors-bosses, regulators, associates, customers?
You can:
understand them
persuade them
motivate them
disturb them, influence them, forgive them
set them an example
20
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
3. Lead & manage your colleagues (horizontal - peers & those you are not in control of) (20%)
The third responsibility is to manage ones peers-those over whom
we have no authority and who have no authority over us -
associates, competitors, suppliers, customers - the entire
environment, if you will.
Without their support, respect, and confidence, little or nothing can
be accomplished.
Peers can make a small heaven or hell of our life.
21
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
4. Lead & manage your direct reports (downwards ) (5%)
The fourth responsibility is to manage those over whom we have
authority.
One need only introduce them to the concept, induce them to
practice it, and enjoy the process. If those over whom we have
authority properly manage themselves, manage us, manage their
peers, and replicate the process with those they employ, what is
there to do but see they are properly recognized, rewarded, and stay
out of their way? It is not making better people of others that
management is about. It's about making a better person of self
22
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
To achieve change within the existing culture you have:
Early adopters
Sit in the middle
Resisters
As leaders you must influence and manage change to achieve your
goals
23
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Everyone is different, with ways of thinking, family background,
priorities, drivers, personality structures, reactions to pressures
Strategies to consider
What drives individuals?
How do they like to take in and process information?
How do they behave under pressure or conflict?
How do you get the best out of them?
What behaviours should you avoid in dealing with them?
Who influences them?
24
UTS:NURSING, MIDWIFERY & HEALTH
Research Leadership in Health Services and Practice
Research Leaders in Health Services and
Practice
Be prepared to ask how are we doing ?
Can we do better?
Is there new evidence that can support practice change?
Look for opportunities to enhance practice. For example
Government funding –NP, EMU, CIN, aged care funding, chronic
disease, oncology, primary health care
Research Funding- AHW; partnership grants; ARC grants; NHMRC
grants
Identify problems of interest
Critically consider the data- how can we make it better for patients and
staff26
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice Review general data
Review of KPI benchmarks; Review complaints
Staff issues provide clues for change
Utilise existing resources
University nursing, midwifery and Medical students; Interested allied
and medical staff
Recruit senior staff ; mould junior clinicians
Present the evidence in different forums/ in different ways/
Profile discipline
Fry, M. (2007) Overview of Emergency Nursing in Australasia, in Emergency and
Trauma Nursing, Curtis, K. Ramsden C.,.Friendship, J. ed., Elsevier, Sydney, pp.
2-8.
Fry, M. (2007) Triage, in Emergency and Trauma Nursing, Curtis, K. Ramsden
C.,.Friendship, J, eds., Elsevier, Sydney, pp. 84-91.
Homer, C. & Fry, M. (2007) Gynecological emergencies, in Emergency and
Trauma Nursing, Curtis, K. Ramsden C.,Friendship, J eds., Elsevier Sydney, pp.
502-515. 27
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice Many types of audits
• Telephone audit: Based on performance indicators DNW
We wanted to explore why patients were leaving the ED prior to treatment being completed
How could we make this work?
• What data collection tool do I need?
• What did I need to collect?
• How do I get the information from patients?
• What did we find?
• Nurses can safely manage and discharge certain patient conditions
• Paediatric area modification
• Pain management in the waiting room
Fry, M. Thompson, J.; Chan, A. 2004,Patients Regularly Leave Emergency Departments
Before Medical Assessment: A Study of Did Not Wait Patients, Medical Profile and
Outcome Characteristics. AENJ 6(2): 21-26.28
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice Knowledge builds a case for change – NI Panadeine Forte study
Serendipitous DNW findings: waiting room patients were leaving
due to pain
What about those patients that sit in the waiting room in pain?
Computer driven audits
We did an audit using the ED computer software program
How long; what to collect; inclusion and exclusion criteria ???
Developed the audit tool based on available evidence and expertise
Impact: waiting room patients could have NI Panadeine Forte
Nurse initiated pain management agents: now with evidence –Endone
Audit cycle continues
Fry, M. Ryan, J.; and Alexander,N 2004 Prospective Study of Nurse
Initiated Panadeine Forte: Expanding Pain Management in the ED.
Accident & Emergency Nursing 12(3):136-140.
29
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Audits help us to gauge the status of play: How are we doing?
How is pain management going in the ED in 2006?
Medical Records audit of patients that presented in pain
Data tool developed between authors
Manual search of medical records -both researchers reviewed the notes
Audit outcome
Described current practice and patients groups
Women were triaged lower and had a greater wait for analgesic administration
Change practices
Education changes for nurses and MO in the ED
Fry, M. Arendts, G. 2006 Factors Associated with Delay to Narcotic Analgesia in Emergency Departments. The Journal of Pain, 7(9) pp 682-686.
30
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
National Audits: National Study NICS –NHMRC
The audit tool was developed in collaboration with the ECoP (n=76)
Audit tool Pilot test in 3 EDs
36 hospitals across Australia
60 patients from each hospital
Change/support/ evidence of practice
Supported the need for all EDs to develop Nurses Initiated pain management
policies
Fry M, Bennetts S, Huckson S. 2011. An Australian Audit of ED Pain
Management Patterns. Journal of Emergency Nursing 37(3): 269-274
31
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Examining and exploring practice
• Timeline
• Work load for data collection?
• Who does it impact on?
• Consider as a pilot
Analysis considerations
• How will I analyse the audit?
• How can I get help?32
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
Project Management
Break the audit/project down
Estimate costs
Prepare a project plan/ Gantt Chart/proposal
Communication management
Informal / formal
Reports
Update for department/s
Wrap around a formal research study
33
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Often need evidence for change
or
Evidence demands change
Audits
Clarify , explore and articulate everyday practice
Develop research skills
Writing and analytical skills
Builds pride and visibility of work practices, colleagues and team members
Publishing of the audit shares knowledge
34
Research Leadership in Health Services
and Practice
35
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Find/present the evidence: Develop a line of argument in a proposal
Why is the topic an issue?
What are gaps?
Why is it a problem?
What is known about the problem?
What is uncertain or unknown?
What needs to be better understood or studied?
What does your idea, innovation, change add or contribute to?
What do you want to do?36
Research Leadership in Health Services and Practice
:Engagement of all staff and care areas
Staff involvement in selecting topics - concerns
about care can be raised and addressed, may
reduce resistance to change.
Priorities of patients and carers can be very
different to those of clinicians, involve users
where possible, e.g. in planning change.
Healthcare staff with the necessary skills37
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Audits can be a research tool
Rigorous, systematic and published
Multidisciplinary group
Increase understanding of everyday practice
identify potential research questions
ANMC Standard 3
Non-clinical time expectation of outcomes
38
Research Leadership in Health Services and
Practice
Nurses Practitioners are well placed to
evaluate services in terms of quality, safety,
effectiveness, appropriateness, consumer
participation, access, equity and efficiency.
39
Knowledge Changes Clinicians
Clinicians Change Practice