research methodology 14062011
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Research MethodologyDaniela Lloyd-Williams 15th June 2011
Phase II: Research Questions
1.Where does CA occur in each SS & what form does it take?
2.What benefits do women gain from engaging in CA?
3.How do these benefits vary with type of CA & why?
4.How does CA, & the benefits that women derive from it, vary between SS
5.Why do the characteristics of CA vary between SS?
Phase II: Methodology
Main steps: • Literature Review including grey & informal literature • Key Informant Interviews• Qualitative field research using PRA techniques• Review and validation of findings through Stakeholder
Dialogues • Triangulation of results & analysis of findings within & across SS
Focus Group discussion in Shinyanga, Tanzania:
Phase II Methodology: Process
•Advisers produce initial guidance and share with country research teams•Advisers + country teams pilot field research element in Ethiopia & Tanzania•Advisers revise field research methodology on basis of pilots (discussions with country teams)•Researchers roll out field research•2/3 through field research hold ProjectTeam Meeting – adjustments
Benefit ranking Jimma, Ethiopia
Linking Research Questions, methods and results
Why do the characteristics of CA vary between
SS?
1. Review Literature
2. Analysis of secondary results
Comparative Gender Analysis of CA across SS and
Regions
How do CA,& benefits, vary between
SS?
1. Focus Groups
2. KI Interviews
1. Analysis of benefits and constraints
2. Gender Analysis
How do these benefits vary with the type of CA &
why?
1. Focus Groups
2. KI Interviews
1. Constraints
2. Analysis of benefits of CA
groups
What benefits do women gain from
CA?
1. Focus Groups 2. KI Interviews
3. SDs
1. Benefit ranking 2. Constraints
3. Gender analysis
Where Does CA occur in each SS, and
what form does it take?
1. SD; 2. Review Literature
3. KI Interviews
1.Gendered SS maps; 2. CA Typlogy;
3. Gender analysis
RQ Methods Key Results Area
Field Research
Focus Group Discussions in 4 communities per SS
• Set up with assistance from local resource person
• 2 FGD per community – these followed on from each other
• Participants for FGD2 were drawn from FGD1
PRA tools
• Matrix covering main CA groups in community
• Chapatti diagram – exploring linkages
• Constraints brainstorming
• Benefits brainstorming and ranking
Chapatti diagram, Jimma, Ethiopia
Applying the RM: Challenges
4 main types of challenges:
1. Literature Review
2. Selection of communities
3. Focus Group Discussions
4. Use of PRA tools in cross-
country research
Example of sub-sector map for sesame in Mali:
Literature Review
•Existing literature on CA limited, especially informal CA•Difficult to obtain ‘grey’ literature•Review of literature not prioritised by researchers
Focus group discussion, Shinyanga ,Tanzania
Selection of communities
Definition of community•Tanzania & Ethiopia similar size, Mali much larger
Selection•Difficult to obtain info on WCA•Key Informants not aware of informal CA•High reliance on a few key informants
Focus Group Discussions
Participants Facilitators
Representative of community? Communicate concepts effectively
Control Group? Probe
Dominance of 1-2 women Manage discussions
Inhibited by presence of resource person
Manage time
Illiteracy
PRA tools
Difficult to design tools to enable cross-country comparison: •Benefit ranking: SS scores influenced by number of CA groups covered
Inconsistent application of PRA tools across countries•Researchers understand & apply tools differently•Manage discussions & probe to different extents
Best Practice
Implications
Cross-country & cross-sector comparisons difficult: identify trends identify most common constraints indicate most significant benefits
X identify most critical constraints
X compare ranks of benefits
Thank you