research on beam size monitors s. csorna, vanderbilt u. lccom2, june 30, ’02, santa cruz proposal...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS
S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U.
LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz
• Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction Radiation. Feng/Gabella/Csorna (Vanderbilt U.)
• Laser Interferometry/Laser Wire Studies. Csorna/Ernst/Hartill(Vanderbilt,Albany,Cornell)
• Electro-Optic Technique for beam size measurements. Gabella/Feng (Vanderbilt U.)
• Bright Needle Electron Sources. Brau (Vanderbilt U.)
![Page 2: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
W. M. Keck-Vanderbilt Free Electron Laser
Center Facilities
College of Arts and Sciences
• College of Engineering• School of Medicine
W. Gabella, B. Feng, J. Kozub and D. Piston
BiOS 2002 – Biomedical Optics and Application, 4633B-31
![Page 3: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• FEL macropulse:– repetition rate: 1-30 Hz– electron duration 8 s– IR pulse duration ~ 3-5 s
• FEL micropulse:– pulse duration ~1 ps– pulse separation ~ 350 ps
(pulse-to-pulse thermal confinement)
FEL pulse structure (Mark-III)VANDERBILT UNIVERSITYVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
![Page 4: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Proposal for non-intercepting beam sizediagnosis using coherent diffraction radiation from a slit
![Page 5: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Advantages:
• Non-invasive (beam goes through a slit).
• Easy Extraction of signal since Diffraction Radiation (DR) directed perpendicular to beam if slit inclined at 45 degrees.
• Responds rapidly to changes in beam, inherently compact, could be installed in many locations.
• Intensity proportional to 2
• In the limit of zero slit width DRTR
Bunch length/bunch shape measurement:
I()= I1()[N+N(N-1)F()]
F() = Bunch Form Factor = S(z)exp[i /c z]dz2
Density Distribution:
In case of symmetric electron bunch:
S z d Fz
c
1
0
cos
![Page 6: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Asymmetric electron bunch
where is the wave number of radiation, () the phase calculated from the observed form factor by the Kramers-Kronig relation:
( ) ( / ) ln ( ) / ( ) / f t f t dt2 2
In case of asymmetric electron bunch:
S z f z d( ) cos/
21 2
2
![Page 7: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Angular distribution from DR
Parallel polarization Normal polarization
![Page 8: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Martin-Puplett Interferometer Electron Beam
Coherent Light
Beam Dump
Detector 2
Detector 1
mirror
Parabolic mirror
Movablemirror
Polarization Splitter
S1 S2
![Page 9: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Proposal Studies
• Radiator
• Longitudinal Bunch Length Experiments
• Transverse Beam Dimension Experiments
• Studies of Diffraction Radiation
![Page 10: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
BUDGET
1. Design, construction and deployment of target/slit 2000.002. Wire or graphite polarizer/beam splitter for interferometer 5000.003. Parabolic reflector (mirror) 1000.004. Stage for moving mirror in the interferometer 5000.005. 2 Golay Cell Detectors (@5000$ each) 10000.00 TOTAL 23,000.00
![Page 11: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Laser Interferometer/Laser Wire Studies
Transverse beam spot size is determined by using the laserinterference fringe as a physical scale. Scan the electronbeam through the fringes and measure the Comptonscattered rays from the photon target.
![Page 12: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
The Modulation Depth M =(Signal Max – Signal Avg)/Signal Maxof the ray flux is related to the transverse beam size:
MUncorrected=cos exp (-(1/2) (2y p)2)
= angle between laser beamsp=fringe pitch= /(2 sin(/2)= /ky
(adjust by changing or using higher harmonics)Corrections :1/ Gaussian laser profile2/ Power imbalance of laser beams can affect contrast3/ Beta Function of e beam + finite width of laser beam along beam direction, etc.Ref: See KEK preprint 96-81 by Tsumoru Shintake (tutorial)
(PRL 74,2479(95)) SLAC FFTB: 706 nm
![Page 13: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
WHAT ABOUT BUNCH LENGTH/BUNCH SHAPE ?
1/Don Hartill is studying the possibility of using timing information to determine bunch length/bunch shape.
2/ Longitudinal beam size can, in principle, be measured bylaser heterodyne techniques. This has not been realized experimentally…. Principle of Operation: Mix two lasers of different frequency to create an intensity modulation at the beat frequency. If the pitch of the beat wave is longer than the bunch length, large fluctuations will be seen in signal due to each pulse. If the pitch is shorter than the bunch length, the signal will be approximately constant. So you can determine a threshold, which is related to the bunch length.
![Page 14: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Scan through relevant beat frequencies, at each frequency measure the difference M. You get: M=(Nmax - Nmin)/( Nmax + Nmin) = (correction factor for laser radius and transverse bunch size) F(beat)/F(0)
Here F(beat) is the Fourier spectrum of the bunch and would look like:
![Page 17: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Conclusion: It is fairly clear that we need to use laser based techniques to measure nm size bunches; we hope to report a more detailed plan at next UCLC meeting.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![Page 18: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Electron-Beam Brightness is More Important than Current
by
Charles A. Brau
Department of Physics
Vanderbilt University
![Page 19: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Electric Field (1010 V/m)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Qua
ntum
Eff
icie
ncy
The quantum efficiency for 266-nm pulses increases sharply at low fields and
approaches unity for high fields
![Page 21: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
We have achieved several orders of magnitude improvement in normalized brightness
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
1.E+12
1.E+13
1.E+14
1.E+15
1.E+16
1.E+17
1.E-04 1.E-02 1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04Current (A)
Nor
mal
ize
d B
rig
htn
ess
(A/m
2-st
era
dia
n)
rf photoinjectors storage rings
field emission thermionic emission
photoelectric field emission
Applications• Far Infrared (100-500 m) FEL
• UV/Soft X-ray (10-400 nm) FEL
• Linear Collider
Observed currents ~ 100 mA from 0.5-m tips produce current densities ~ 1011 A/m2
with an estimated normalized brightness ~ 1016 A/m2-steradian
![Page 22: RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d535503460f94a2fd70/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Conclusion: Charley Brau is currently studying the possibility of getting polarized electrons from a needle source. A detailed research plan is to follow…