research seminar series 2009: access and success for all jamie thompson jamie harding karen...
TRANSCRIPT
Research Seminar Series 2009:
Access and Success for All
Jamie ThompsonJamie HardingKaren Williamson
Northumbria Bedfordshire and Manchester Universities
To illuminate and improve student retention (student progression, student success)
One of seven funded three year projects Building on previous work with ELLI ELLI? Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory
Learning Power
Curriculum and Assessment Practices
Pedagogy
Institutional Ethos
Worldviews andTraditions
Home, Family and Community
Cultural Tools
Peer Culture
Self-regulation
Goal Orientation
Interest
Sense of SelfAs Learner
Effort
DispositionsLocus ofControl
Self-efficacy
Skills and Capacities
AwarenessSelf Esteem
72 item questionnaire Tested and Validated Self-report Malleable and situational Statements of how think / feel / behave as a
learner 4 point Lickert scale Available online Instant feedback as a spider diagram Class / group profiles also produced
Changing and Learning Meaning Making Critical Curiosity Creativity Learning Relationships Strategic Awareness Resilience
Being Stuck and Static Data Accumulation Passivity Being Rule Bound Isolation & Dependence Being Robotic Fragility & Dependence
Do students’ dispositions change in the course of their academic programme
Does using ELLI in itself boost student retention and achievement?
Are there dispositions to learn that have an impact on student retention and achievement?
Can retention initiatives based on problematic dispositions be formulated and evaluated?
4 students who have withdrawn compared to 374 who have not
‘Withdrawers’ achieved higher mean scores on every dimension
Differences significant for Critical Curiosity and Strategic Awareness
PCAP students higher than other groups on Critical Curiosity, Meaning Making, Resilience and Strategic Awareness
Psychology students lower than journalism students on Creativity and Critical Curiosity
Educational Practice students higher than Journalism in Learning Relationships
Men scored significantly higher on Critical Curiosity, Resilience and Creativity
Woman had higher mean marks Men achieved significantly higher marks
when they scored higher on Critical Curiosity and Strategic Awareness
Women achieved significantly higher marks when they scored higher on resilience
Students from lower socio-economic groups scored lower on Learning Relationships
Non-British students scored higher in the area of Creativity and Strategic Awareness, but achieved lower mean marks (not sig.)
Chinese students had higher levels of Creativity than White students
3 focus groups: one academic staff on PCAP programme and two students on MAP
5 individual interviews: four ambassadors of MAP students and one academic staff at Manchester
Questionnaires from academic staff introducing ELLI to students
Triangulation in the areas of Critical Curiosity and Changing and Learning
Students perceived benefits of self-reflection for personal development
Students found the language of ELLI advantageous
Staff positive, some concerns over practical issues
How should we respond to higher scores on dimensions among students who withdraw?
Will negative correlation between marks and Learning Relationships and Creativity be reproduced more widely?
How do students dispositions change with time – can this be influenced by interventions?
Is there an appropriate response to gender differences?
Exploration of changes to learning dimensions with time
Larger datasets to examine further relationships between learning dispositions and marks
Exploration of the impact of combinations of different dispositions
More withdrawers to make comparisons in terms of learning dimensions
Exploration of learning dimensions with:
Students who have withdrawn from an academic programme
Students who have been referred in an academic programme
Students who have high scores in high dimensions