resettlement plan (draft) ban: sasec second bangladesh ... · sasec second bangladesh–india...
TRANSCRIPT
SASEC Second Bangladesh–India Electrical Grid Interconnection Project (RRP BAN 44192)
i
Resettlement Plan (Draft)
July 2015
BAN: SASEC Second Bangladesh–India Electrical
Grid Interconnection Project
Prepared by Power Grid Company of Bangladesh (PGCB) for the Asian Development Bank
This Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country programme or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
i
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
ARIPO Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance
BPDB Bangladesh Power Development Board
CHT Chittagong Hill Tracts
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DC Deputy Commissioner
DESCO Dhaka Electricity Supply Company Ltd
DMS Detailed Measurement Survey
DP Displaced Person
DPDC Dhaka Power Distribution Company
EA Executing Agency
GAP Gender Action Plan
GRC Grievance Redress Committee
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
HIES Household Income and Expenditure Survey
IDB Islamic Development Bank
IOL Inventory of Losses
IP Indigenous People
JVT Joint Valuation Team
LILO Line In Line Out
MOPEMR Ministry of Power Energy and Mineral Resources
PGCB Power Grid Company of Bangladesh
PMU Project Management Unit
PVAT Property Valuation Advisory Team
ROW Right of way
RP Resettlement Plan
RU Resettlement Unit
SEC Small Ethnic Community
T/L Transmission Line
TABLE OFCONTENTS
Executive Summary
I. Introduction 1
II. Project Description 1
III. Objectives of the Resettlement Plan 2
IV. Scope of Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement Impact 4
V. Socio-Economic Information and Profile of the Area 9 Methodology of the Social Analysis 9 General Socio-Economic Profile of the Area 9 Review and Analysis of Socioeconomic Survey Data 10 Key Findings from Socio-economic Survey 10 Impact on Indigenous Peoples (IP): 11 Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure 11 Grievance Redress Mechanism 12
VI. Legal Framework 13
VII. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Principles 13 Gaps Between Laws of Bangladesh and the ADB Involuntary
Resettlement Policy 14
VIII. Compensation Framework 21
IX. Relocation of Housing and Settlements 25 X Income Livelihood Restoration and Rehabilitation 25 XI. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan 26
XII. Institutional Arrangements 28
XIII. Implementation Schedule 29
XIV. Monitoring and Reporting 30
Annex 1 Deed of land transfer from Bangladesh Railway to PGCB 32 Annex 2 Socio-economic profile of the project affected people 35 Annex 3 List of Stakeholders at Focus Group Discussions at Iswardee
and Bheramara 40
Annex 4 Guideline on internal Monitoring
43
List of Tables a. Assessment of the Temporary Impacts of Transmission Lines 8 b. Demographic Scenario of the Project Area 9 c. Grievance Redress Procedure 12 d. A compliance Review of the Bangladesh Laws and Regulations and
the Involuntary Resettlement Safeguard Principles of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement of 2009
16
e. Entitlement Matrix 21 f. Indicative Budget for Compensation 26 g. RP Implementation Schedule 29
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project description: In order to mitigate the power crisis and demand shortfall, an agreement was
signed between the governments of Bangladesh and India for procurement of additional 500
megawatts of power from India through back to back High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) system
which will be installed at the same premises of existing HVDC station at Bheramara, Kushtia. To
evacuate the additional power from said HVDC system, Power Grid Company of Bangladesh Limited
(PGCB) intends to construct Power Transmission Line from Bheramara 400/230kV sub-station1 at
Kushtia district, to Ishwardi 230/132 kV sub-station at Pabna district within the mid-western regions
of Bangladesh across the mighty river Padma. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the
Government of Bangladesh will provide financial assistance for the project.The total estimated cost
of the project is $198 million with financial contribution of $ 120 million from ADB. The Executing
Agency is PGCB.
Scope of land acquisition and involuntary resettlement impact: According to the feasibility study
of CEGIS2and focus group discussions (FGD) conducted during the socio-economicsurveys (SES),
construction of 500 MW back-to-back HVDC sub-station at Bheramarawill be done within the same
campus of the existing 500 MW HVDC sub-station (area of 113 acres) constructed under the
SASEC Bangladesh India Electric Grid interconnection Project, owned by PGCB. PGCB also has
enough land at Iswardi substation to erect the towers and other instrument inside the substation
required for receiving the incoming 230 kV line. So, there is no need of land acquisition (LA) for
the2substations and no people will be physically or economically displaced for this intervention. As a
result, the lengthy procedure of LA following the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property
Ordinance 1982 (ARIPO) will not be required.
A total of around 40 towers will be constructed along the proposed 12 km transmission line from
Bheramara400/230kV sub-stationto Ishwardi 230/132 KV sub-station. The right of way (ROW) for
230kV transmission line is 20 meters on each sides of the center line. This transmission line and the
transmission towers will have temporaryimpact on people, crop and trees of the project impact area.
Construction of high rise buildings, plantation of tall trees, etc. under the aerial lines will be restricted
upto a certain height. . The number of persons to be potentially affected by the temporary
economic displacement due to the construction works has been estimated at 281 people covering
44 acres of land.
According to the prevailing practice for all previous and ongoing power transmission projects, PGCB
will not acquire the land below the transmission towers, rather use the ROW after providing
adequate compensation and special assistance to the Affected Persons (APs) for re-establishing
theincome and livelihoodin accordance with the ElectricityAct 1910 and ADB’s Safeguards Policy
Statement (SPS) 2009, as well as by following ‘best practice’ in Bangladesh.
1 Bheramara substation has a 400 kV incoming from Indian side to HVDC and 230 kV outgoing side towards national grid. The new
transmission line will evacuate from 230 kV side. 2 Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services
Socio-economic profile of the project impact area. The transmission lines will run over 11
villages3 of Kushthia and Pabna district. The SES conducted in the project area shows that there are
32 affected households in the project area consisting 117 members. This includes 62 males and 55
females. Out of the 32 household surveyed, maximum16 are in village Char Gopalnagor and
minimum1 is in Christi. The sex ratio of male and female of this affected population is 53 % males
and 47% female. The average family size is 3.66 members per HH which is below the national
average.
Most of the households are functionally landless4 and 31.25% are marginal
5 to small
6 farm holders.
There is no household in the area with a large land holding group. Most of the landless and marginal
farmers are having their livelihood from neighboring government khas land. It is observed that the
size of khas land or leased land under cultivation of each farmer is usually bigger than what he
owns.About 21.9% of total population is engaged in business, where 37.5% are in service, 6% are
engaged in household work, and about 34.4% of population is working in other sector. There is no
idle work force in the locality. Although the economy of the broader area is based on agriculture as
mentioned in the BBS7 reports, the sample population surveyed along the ROW did not have any
APs completely living on agriculture. The agriculture products are secondary sources of income for
the APS. Most of the people’s annual income and expenditure varies from BDT60,000 to
BDT720,000.
There is no women-headed household in the project area that could be termed as vulnerable AP.
Poverty was measured through self-assessment in the study area. In this process the respondents
were asked to assess the overall condition of people living in the study area. Their responses are
assembled into three categories such as (i) deficit, (ii) breakeven and (iii) surplus. The SES reveals
that most of the people are in breakeven categories whereas only 10% households fall in surplus
category and 10% households fall indeficit categories.
Among the 32 affected HHs, 40.62% have sanitary toilet facilities with water-sealed arrangement,
and 46.87% have non water-sealed sanitary toilet. Remaining12.5% HHs has non-sanitary toilet
facility. About 96% people can collect drinking water from tube well, 2% from supply tap water and
remaining 2% can collect drinking water from other sources like ponds, river, ring well etc. The
percentage of tube-well coverage is significant.
Review and Analysis of Socio-economic Survey (SES) Data: The proposed project area is
characterized as high land prone to flash flood during rainy season and drought in the dry season.
The project area is also suffers from siltation of the rivers and overflow caused by flash flood water
onto the surrounding agricultural land. The project site is in rural area with the primary economy
based on agriculture. The current land use pattern is mixed growingthree crops per year. Major
agricultural production is from aman and bororiceas well as pulses, jute, wheat, maize, tobacco,
spices, vegetables, Banana,andLichi. Many peoples are involved in business, services and other
activities.
3Charmirkamari, Baghail, Saraghat, Chargolapnagor, Boraichora, BoraitolaJoynagar, Civilhat,Iswardi Municipality, Char Silimpur,
Bamannago, Mokarampur 4 those possessing less than 49 decimal of land
5 Marginal land holder-possessing 50 to 149 decimals of land
6 Small land holder-possessing 150 to 249 decimal of land
7 Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
v
Impact on indigenous Peoples (IP): In terms of the place of residence, the small ethnic
community (SEC) peoples can be grouped into two broad categories: (i) those living in hills,
predominantly residing in the Chittagong Hill Tract (CHT); and (ii) those living in plain lands. There
are no SEC people in the locality as SECs concentrate in other districts of Bangladesh.
Information disclosure, consultation and participation: The Resettlement Plan (RP) was
developed in consultation with several stakeholders who included officials of the Executing Agencies
(EAs), persons potentially to be displaced or affected, community members living around the project
area and poor and vulnerable groups. Consultations were conducted among 25 persons potentially
to be displaced and general public in 4 locations. Both men and women stakeholders were
consulted, who did not have any major issues on the proposed project since they did not have any
adverse impacts. The EA will continue to engage in consultations with the displaced communities
and the civil society organizations to disclose information included in the RP, entitlement matrix,
compensation payment procedures, progress of resettlement related activities, safeguard plans etc.
through both the resettlement and the monitoring units to be established under the Project
Management Unit (PMU).
Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) : Since the existing legal framework of Bangladesh
provides for grievance redress only in limited areas such as issues related to land acquisition
and requisition and payment of compensation and does not address resettlement related issues
that may arise from involuntary land acquisition, EA will establish a Grievance Redress
Mechanism with neutral Grievances Redress Committee (GRC) that is easily accessible and
immediately responsive to the grievances of the DPs. GRM will be made effective immediately after
disclosure of the updated RP, and will continue upto the end of the project.
Entitlements: The entitlements for the displaced persons (DP) have been finalized taking into
account the provisions made in the land acquisition laws of Bangladesh and the safeguard principles
of the ADB (2009). Provisions have been made to pay compensation at ‘replacement cost’ for the
private land to be acquired as well as for the loss of crops and trees, irrespective of the title that DPs
hold to such properties. DPs will also be provided with compensation for the temporary loss of their
standing crops over and above their market value.
Resettlement Plan implementation: Since this RP was prepared on the basis of preliminary
engineering design, The EA will review and update the RP after final engineering design, census,
detailed measurement surveys (DMS), and Inventory of Losses (IOL). The updated RP will be
disclosed to the DPs and the general public and obtain ADB’s approval prior to the commencement
of the project construction work by the contractor. The PMU will take the overall responsibility for
coordination and monitoring of the RP implementation and will set up a Resettlement Unit and a
Monitoring Unit with competent staff and required infrastructure to facilitate the effective
implementation of the RP.
Monitoring and reporting: The Monitoring Unit of the PMU will develop monitoring methodologies
inclusive of the relevant indicators and an elaborate monitoring plan for disclosure of monitoring
results well in advance of the project implementation. The monitoring system will adopt a
participatory approach and engage all the relevant stakeholders in the monitoring process. The
methodologies to be adopted for monitoring will include: focus group discussions, individual
interviews, rapid appraisals, sample surveys and studies. A set of verifiable indicators will be used to
measure the process, outcomes and impacts of RP implementation and its compliance with
safeguard plans. The Monitoring Unit will produce progress reports for the review and appraisal by
the EA and to provide updates in the quarterly progress reports. Semi-annual reports will be
submitted to ADB through the EA.
1
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Bangladesh faces a rapid growth in electricity demand as the economy expands and
liquid fuel based power generation while comparatively expensive can be rapidly installed to
meet this growth. In this context, the government has set an ambitious target of achieving
electricity for all by 2021 (i.e. 50 years from independence) and initiated a series of programs to
add new generating capacity to meet an expected 19 gigawatt (GW) power demand by 2021.
This includes rehabilitation of existing power plants to improve their efficiency and to better
utilize existing gas reserves, the development of a range of fuel sources including coal and
renewable energy, and finally, the creation on inter-country grid interconnections to draw power
from the south Asian region. In 2010, a joint communiqué on electrical grid connectivity was
signed between Bangladesh and India heralding a breakthrough in cooperation between the two
countries8 and in October 2013, the electricity grids of the two neighboring countries were
connected. This first inter-country electrical grid to electrical grid interconnection in south Asia
was supported under the ADB financed SASEC Bangladesh India Electricity Grid
Interconnection Project with 500 MW of power flows from India to Bangladesh in 2013.
Connecting the two grids resulted in a reduction of power interruptions, a reduction in
transmission losses and an improvement in the voltage profile particularly in Western
Bangladesh.
2. The proposed Project to expand interconnection capacity from 500 MW to 1000 MW was
examined by a joint technical team from both countries and considered viable to enhance
Bangladesh's power capacity, help to meet power deficits and to reduce dependence on small,
inefficient and expensive captive and rental generation facilities in Bangladesh that rely on liquid
fuel such as oil and diesel. The Power Grid Company of Bangladesh Ltd. (PGCB) has
constructed 27.17 km of 400 kV transmission lines between Indian border and Kushtia and a
500 MW HVDC9 back-to-back10 at Bheramara (Kushtia). To import additional 500 MW power
and evacuate the power to another 330 kVA substation at Pabna, new power transmission lines
are required to be constructed along with another back-to-back station. PGCB is planning to
construct the transmission lines and associated facilities under the project entitled “Second
SASEC Bangladesh-India Electrical Grid Interconnection Project” with a total cost of $198
million.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3. The Second SASEC Bangladesh-India Electrical Grid Interconnection Project comprises
of two physical components, viz., (i) Construction of one new 400/230kV HVDC back-to-back
sub-station (500 MW) at Bheramara, in Kushtia District and (ii) Erection of 12 kilometers of
230kV double circuit transmission line from Bheramara to Iswardi substation in Pabna District.
PGCB is the Executing Agency (EA) for the project.
8In 1997, ADB facilitated dialogue between Bangladesh and India to identify possibilities of exchange of power.
9 High Voltage Direct Current 10
Technical term ‘back to back station’ refers to substation
2
III. OBJECTIVE OF RESETTLEMENT PLAN
3. The Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) of the Asian Development Bank (2009) requires
the borrowers/clients to prepare a resettlement plan (RP) when involuntary resettlement impacts
of a project are significant and that it affects a large number of persons or their families.
Although the project is likely to be category B under involuntary resettlement safeguards, this
RP is prepared in compliance with the ADB safeguard policy to (i) screen and assess the
magnitude of the impacts of the proposed project, (ii) plan appropriate strategies and measures
to avoid, minimize, mitigate or compensate for the potential adverse impacts on displaced
persons, (iii) ensure that displaced persons are adequately informed and consulted during
project preparation and implementation, and (iv) disclose safeguard plans that secure the rights
of displaced persons.
4. This RP prepared Project and, proposed by PGCB, includes an assessment of the
involuntary resettlement impacts resulting from land requisition, a description of the socio-
economic profiles of persons to be displaced and project impact area, an entitlement matrix that
provides for compensation and other needed assistance for displaced persons, a strategy for
livelihood and income restoration, grievance redress processes, institutional arrangements for
the implementation of the RP, a time frame for RP implementation, a budget and a financial
plan, and a monitoring and reporting framework. Since this RP was prepared on the basis of
preliminary engineering design and other available information, the EA will review and update
the RP after detailed measurement surveys (DMS) and final engineering design. The
preparation of the RP was guided by the following principles:
a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be avoided
or minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project
designs and appropriate social, economic, operational and engineering solutions
that have the least impact on populations in the project area.
b. No site clearance will be given in anticipation or before being considered for
inclusion in the project site.
c. Displaced households residing, working, doing business, and/or cultivating land
within the impact area during the conduct of the census and in the detailed DMS,
are entitled to be compensated for their lost assets, incomes and businesses at
replacement cost, and will be provided with assistance to improve or at least
maintain their pre-project level living standards, income-earning capacity and
production levels.
d. Displaced households (HH) will be eligible for compensation and rehabilitation
assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing and any
such factors that may discriminate against achievement of the resettlement
3
objectives. Lack of legal rights to lost assets or tenure status and social or
economic status will not bar the displaced HHs from entitlements to
compensation and assistance.
e. Displaced HHs will be fully consulted and given the opportunity to participate in
matters that will affect their lives during the design, implementation and
operation. Moreover, plans for the acquisition and use of assets will be carried out
in consultation with the displaced households who will receive prior information of
the compensation and other assistance available to them.
f. Any acquisition of or restriction on access to resources owned or managed by the
displaced HHs as a common property, such as, pasture area will be mitigated by
arrangements that will ensure that they have access to equivalent resources.
g. There will benodeductionsincompensation payments for structures or other
affected assets for salvage value, depreciation, taxes, stamp duties, fees or
other payments.
h. There will be effective mechanisms for hearing and resolving grievances during
the planning and implementation of the project.
i. If ownership over any affected asset is under dispute, the case wills
behandledin accordance with the grievance redress mechanism (GRM) agreed
with the EA.
j. Temporarily affected land and structures will be restored to pre-project
conditions.
k. Existing social, cultural and religious practices will be respected.
l. Special measures will be incorporated in the RP to complement mitigation and
enhancement activities to protect socially and economically vulnerable groups at
high risk of impoverishment. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help them
improve their socio- economic status.
m. Adequate resources will be identified and committed during the preparation of the
RP. This includes adequate budgetary support fully committed and made
available to cover the costs of compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation
within the agreed implementation period for the project; and adequate human
resources for supervision, liaison and monitoring of land acquisition, resettlement
and rehabilitation activities.
4
n. Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified
and set in place as part of the resettlement management system.
o. The RP or its summary will be translated into local language and placed in district
and sub-district offices for the reference of displaced households and other
interested groups.
p. Civil works contractors will not be issued a notice of possession for any given
geographic location in accordance with the approved RP until (i) compensation
payment at replacement cost have been satisfactorily completed for that area; (ii)
agreed rehabilitation program is in place; and (iii) the area is free from all
encumbrances.
q. Cash compensation for displaced HHs losing commercial structures will be made
available well ahead of civil works to allow the displaced households sufficient
lead time for reconstruction and tore-establish the businesses. No demolition of
assets and /or entry to properties will be done until the displaced household is
fully compensated and relocated.
IV. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION ANDINVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT
5. The HVDC substation will be located within the premises of the Bheramara on 113 acres
of land which was previously acquired from the Government of Bangladesh under the 2010 grid
interconnection project. Figure 1 shows the existing boundary of the substation, while the land
was transferred from the Bangladesh Railway (BR)to PGCB, during the first phase. The transfer
document of the BR land is in attachment1. The red line parts within figure 1 shows the new
substation which would be built within the existing premise.So, no land acquisition will be
required for construction of the sub-station, and hence nobody will be affected for component 1.
However, component 2, i.e.the transmission line will traverse over five unions, two upzilas, viz.,
Iswardi and Bheramara, nine mouzas and one municipality. These are Sara, Iswardi
Municipality, Char Silimpur, Silimpur, Baghail, Bamannagor, Golapnagor, Char Glapnagor,
Mokarampur, and Char Mokarampur Mouza, as shown in figure 2.Erection of transmission
lineincluding the towers will affect281 people. The 3 types of impacts of the construction on the
affected peoples are: (i) crop loss and restricted land use for plantation of deep-rooted trees at
the foundation of towers, (ii) loss of standing crops and trees along the right of way during the
construction, and (iii) temporary loss of income during the construction.
5
Figure 1: Existing boundary of substation at Bheramara
6
Figure 2: Proposed transmission line crossing 9 mouzas
6. The methodologies adopted for the due diligence included the following: Firstly, Center
for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), a consulting firm, carried out
asurvey in March 2015 to assess the initial environmental effects that could result due to
construction of the proposed transmission line. CEGIS also collected baseline data as part of its
survey. Subsequently, a team from PGCB, CEGIS and ADB’s Social Safeguards Specialist
conducted a joint walk through survey and video-filmed the proposed alignment on 14 April
2015 and this date have been adopted as the cut-off date for assessing the impacts and
eligibility of compensation. A socio-economic survey was carried out during 19 to 21 April 2015.
Three options were examined for the transmission lines and thereafter the option 2 for crossing
the Padma River through a char land was determined to have the least impact. Finally, another
route survey was conducted on 10 May 2015 to avoid two puccca houses that were located
within the previously planned ROW. As a result, the alignment has now been slightly shifted to
minimize the involuntary resettlement (IR).
7. The work of clearing of direct impacted area of the ROW to be carried out as early as
possible during the construction of transmission line.It is required for safe and reliable operation
of transmission line. Small bush growth, shrubs and trees, and semi-permanentstructure whose
height is not expected to growbeyond 3 meters may be allowed to remain. The trees above 3
7
meters (about 10 feet) are not allowed to grow below the high voltage transmission line as per
electrical engineering design principle. These types of trees will be removed from the right of
way and compensation for such trees is covered in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
of the Project, to avoid double counting.
8. The transmission line will have temporary impacts on standing crops (which are below 3
meter in height) during the construction. None of the transmission lines require any land
acquisition for their constructions but will have temporary impact on standing crops during the
installation of towers. The foundation of the tower legs will have pile caps with an average size
of 100 square feet, each. In such locations (tentatively 160 points), land will be returned back to
the farmers and perennial crop cultivation will be possible. However, since any deep rooted
trees will not be possible to grow, crop compensation will be given at higher rate than the
market rate in those small pockets of land.
8. Since the power transmission line will traverse mostly along agricultural land and low
lying areas, no major threat to perennial trees has been observed. However, there is a
considerable impact on rice cultivation for 1 to 3 seasons. In addition to the loss of cultivation,
the right of way consists a number of small structure, viz., 6 semi-permanent houses (Brick wall
and tin roof), 16 tin-shed houses, 4 rice processing mills; 3 ponds, and 580 big trees (above 3
meters). PGCB will not remove the structures as per their design principle but cut the big trees
and pay compensation through the EMP. For the perennial crops, sufficientcompensation and
relocation fund shall be provided as per the Entitlement Matrix of this RP.
9. The total length of the transmission line (T/L) is estimated as 12 kilometers (km).
According to the law and practice of Bangladesh, the width of the Direct Impact Area11 (DIA)is
20 meters for 230 kV and 400 kV T/Ls. So, an estimated area ofabout 60 acres12 will be
temporarily required for the right of way (ROW) of the line. The estimated number of towers is
40 of which 14 will be angle type and the remaining 26 will be suspension type that will be
installed approximately at 300 to 600 meters intervals, with each tower requiring a land area of
225 to 400 square meters13. Therefore, the total land to be temporarily affected by the tower
construction is estimated at 16,000 square meters14 (4 acres equivalent). It is also estimated
that about 32 HHs will be temporarily and economically displaced at the tower location with the
loss of their rice cultivations during the construction.
10. During the stringing, high tension power cables and machineries will be laid in the ROW,
damaging the standing crops, and trees. Excluding two rivers and high land areas, crops on 40
acres of land are anticipated to be affected for 2 harvesting cycles. These lands will not be
acquired by the project, but the damaged crops and trees are to be compensated by PGCB.
Both EA and its contractors will make efforts to schedule the construction work during off
11
as per IEE page no 16 of the project 12
1 acre= 4,046.85 square meter 13
Angle tower 20mx20 meter, suspension tower- 15mx15m 14
Since the number of tower type and the size will be finalized after detailed design, the maximum size of 20mX20m has been considered for all 40 towers, to remain in conservative side
8
seasons of the cultivations in order to minimize the adverse impacts on income livelihood of the
Affected Persons (AP). Cash compensation to the displaced farmers will be paid in full as per
the Entitlement Matrix and prior to the commencement of the construction work. Table 1 shows
the assessment of all temporary losses as described above.
Table 1: Assessment of the Temporary Impacts of Transmission Lines
Sl.
no.
proje
ct
comp
onent
T/L
Len
gth
(in
Km)
DIA(i
n
mete
rs)15
No.
To
we
rs16
Tota
l
affe
cted
Are
a(Ac
res)
Estimated
area for
temporary
crop
damage
due to
Towers
(Acres)17
Estimate
d no.
tempora
rily
affected
people
Name of
the villages
along
ROW as
per joint
walk
through
General profile
and cropping
pattern along
the ROW
1. Trans
missi
on
line
12 40 40 44 4 281 Charmirkamari, Baghail, Saraghat, Chargolapnagor, Boraichora, Boraitola, Joynagar, Civilhat, Iswardi Municipality, Char Silimpur, Bamannag, Mokarampur
Three crops
are grown
annually. Major
agricultural
production is
from aman and
boro paddy as
well as pulses,
Jute, wheat,
Maize,
tobacco,
spices
Vegetable and
Banana,
11. The objective of the Resettlement Plan (RP) is to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project on the project Affected Peoples (PAPs) in relation to their physical and economic displacement. The survey results for the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) carried out by CEGIS in March 2015 to facilitate the baseline information have been collected from the field to prepare the draft RP. In order to fully redress the resettlement impact and practically resolve of compensation mechanism to the DPs,the RP will be updated through 100% census, detail measurement survey and socioeconomic survey after the detail design.
15
According to the law and practice of Bangladesh, the width of the ROW is as follows; 30 meters for 132 kV T/L; 40 meters for 230 kV and 400 kV T/L and DIA of 20 meters 16
The towers along a T/L will be erected every 300 meters. 17
The land required for erecting a single tower is maximum 20 meters x 20 meters.
9
12. This RP is guided by the national law (Government of Bangladesh, the Electricity Act, 1910), and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).The implementation of RP is to be initiated by PGCB with the help of third party before the commencement of civil works, i.e. construction of the back to back sub-station and pilling/open foundation of the towers. 13. A social analysis has been carried out with the broad objectives of (a) establishing a baseline socio-economic profile of the displaced persons, as well as the people living in the surroundings of the proposed project; and b) identifying the impacts on communities potentially to be displaced by the implementation of the project. Data collected for the social analysis included socio demography of their communities, livelihood practices, incidence of poverty and unemployment, land ownership patterns, household energy usage, status of housing, education, health, water and sanitation, migration patterns, development interventions in the communities, roles of women etc. A summary of findings are presented in the following section.
V. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE OF THE AREA
A. Methodology Of The Social Analysis
14. Data for the social analysis was derived from both primary and secondary sources. The
secondary data was largely based on the Bangladesh National Census of 201118
and
Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) of 201119
and a selected number of
research studies and reports that was accessible. B. General Socio-economic Profile of the Area
15. Population: There are 32,322 households in the study area consisting of 141,590 people. This includes 71,274 (50.34%) males and 70,316 (49.66%) females. The key demographic data of the project is presented in Table 2.
Table: 2 Demographic scenario of the project area
Mouza Total Households
Population
Total Male Female
Sara 440 2,064 1,060 1,004
Pourashavas 16,411 70,920 35,773 35,147
Char Silimpur 1,486 6,641 3,353 3,288
Char Mirkamari 3,063 14,655 7,546 7,109
Baghail 3,073 13,970 7,189 6,781
Bamanagar - - - -
Golapnagar 3,277 13,652 6,684 6,968
Char Golapnagar 704 3,167 1,570 1,597
Mokarimpur 3,612 15,439 7,532 7,907
Char Mokarimpur 256 1,082 567 481
Total/Average 32,322 141,590 71,274 70,316
18
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2012) Population and Housing census 2011 Socio-Economic and Demographic Report National Series Vol.4
19 Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2010) Report of the Household Income and Expenditure Survey
10
1. (50.34%) (49.66%)
Source: Estimated Population 2015, Based on BBS, 2011.
16. Housing condition: In the study area the housing condition is moderate. About 50 % of houses are katcha, 30% houses are Semi Pucca and rest 10% houses are Pucca. General income of the people is changing which is reflected in the housing condition.
17. Access to Electricity: It is an important indicator for measuring improvement of an area. Iswardi is an industrial and municipal area where around 80% households (HH) are under electricity coverage. Therural area average 65 % HHs is under electricity coverage which is better than national average. During the SES it is learnt that load-shedding hasbeen decreased a lot after implementation of phase I of the project.
18. Drinking water: Drinking water is a major indicator of measuring social condition. It is
measured through self-assessment which shows that, 98% people can collect drinking water
from tube well, 2% from pipes supply water and rest of the 2% can collect drinking water from
other sources such as ponds, river etc. the data analysis shows the percentage of tube-well
coverage is significant. The primary data was derived from interviews conducted with 30
persons to be potentially displaced along the ROW.
C. Review and Analysis of Socioeconomic Survey Data
19. The project area covers Nine Mouza namely (i) Pourashava, (ii) Sara, (ii) CharSilimpur,
(iii) Char Mirkamari, (iv) Baghail, (v)Bamannagor, (vi)Golapnagor, (vii) Char Golapnagor (viii)
Mokarampur and ( ix) Char Mokarampur. The extent of the project’s impact varies by location.
The Mouzas are located along the back to back substation and the transmission line to be
constructed.
20. The proposed project area is characterized as high land prone to flash flood during rainy
season and drought in the dry season. The project area is also suffers from siltation of the rivers
and overflow caused by flash flood water onto the surrounding agricultural land.
21. The subproject site is a rural area with the primary economy based on agriculture. The
current land use pattern is mixed. This is a three cropped area. Major agricultural production is
from aman and boro paddy as well as pulses, jute, wheat, maize, tobacco, spices, vegetable
banana, litchi. Many peoples involved in business, services and other non-formal activities.
There is no idle work force in the locality.
D. Key Findings from the Socio-economic Survey (SES)
22. The socio-economic information of the project area based on the SES of 32 affected
households (HH) in the tower area is summarized as follows: The average family size is 3.66
members per HH which is lower than the national average. About 68.8% of the sample
population is non-literate which is higher than the national average. Most of the affected peoples
(AP) are functionally land-less and 31.25% are marginal landowner20. Every affected person is
in possession of some Khas or lease land which is higher than what they own. There is no
20
land holder-possessing 50 to 149 decimals of land
11
female headed house hold among the affected persons. Although the BBS reports shows the
primary economy of the area to be based on agriculture, the APs of the survey area were found
mainly engaged in business, office work, house-hold works and other profession but not
depended on Agriculture. Most of the APs are poor, whose annual income varies from
Tk.60,000-72,000. The APs will loss standing crops and will be deprived of cultivable product.
But they will not lose any skill or occupation due to implementation of this project. The detailed
occupation survey could not be done due to time constraint, which will be completed after DMS,
during updating the RP.
Mitigation measure: The loss of standing crops of the APs will be compensated in full to recover
the loss as per entitle matrix and price will be fixed by PAVT. The project will generate jobs for
the APs during construction as a direct benefit. It will gear production capacity of the existing
industries and creation of new industries in western part of Bangladesh
A. Impact on Indigenous Peoples (IP):
23. According to Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh (2008) about 41% of the total ethnic
people of the country live in CHT in three districts namely Rangamati, Bandarban, and
Khagrachari. There is a high concentration of ethnic groups in North Bengal (Naogaon,
Dinajpur, Rajshahi, Rangpur and Joypurhat districts of Rajshahi division). However, since there
is no IP inhabitants recorded in the project locality, IP safeguards will not trigger, and the project
is categorized as C for IP safeguards.
B. Consultation, Participation, and Information Disclosure
24. Consultation and communication with APs and other stakeholders during the preparation
stage of the project is an integral part of gathering relevant data for impact assessment, and
facilities and development of appropriate options for resettlement of APs. The Resettlement
Plan (RP) was developed in consultation with several stakeholders who included officials of
PGCB, persons potentially identified to be displaced or affected, community members living
around the project area and poor and vulnerable groups. Consultations were conducted among
25 general public in 4 locations, whose list is attached as Annex 3. Both men and women
members were consulted, who did not have any major issues on the proposed project since
they did not envisageany major adverse impact. The EA will continue to engage in consultations
with the displaced communities and the community based organizations (CBO) to transparently
disclose information included in the RP, entitlement matrix, compensation payment procedures,
progress of resettlement related activities, safeguard plans etc. through both the resettlement
and the monitoring units, to be established under the Project Management Unit (PMU) of PGCB
25. The RP will be disclosed to the affected community in Bangla to obtain the views of APs
and other stakeholders on the compensation and resettlement provisions. Accordingly, the
contribution of APs and beneficiary groups will be included in the updated RP. Transparent
disclosure of all project related information, including all RP implementation related events will
be ensured by PGCB. Although consultation is a continuous process, PGCB will ensure one
consultation stage in between disclosure of revised RP and start payment of compensation to
the Entitle Persons.
12
C. Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)
26. PGCB will establish a mechanism to receive and facilitate the resolution of the concerns and grievances of PAPs about physical and economic displacement and other project related impacts. Fair and impartial Grievance Redress Committees (GRCs) will be established at grass root level to ensure stakeholder’s participation in the implementation process. The objective of the GRM is to resolve all the grievances amicably at filed level. GRCs will be formed at Union level for any grievances involving resettlement benefits, relocation, and other assistance. Prior to using the GRC, all efforts will be made at the project level to reach informal resolution of APs grievances. Only then will the GRC be approached by APs having grievances. Grievance cases from the APs will be received in the office of the GRC Chairperson. GRM will be made effective immediately after disclosure of the final RP and will continue upto the end of the project.
27. Upon receipt of grievances, the GRC will organize hearings and pass verdicts, which will be formally conveyed to the concerned APs. The GRC will settle the disputes within 15 days of receiving a grievance. Table 3 shows the steps of GRM in brief.
Table 3: Grievance Redress Procedure
Step 1 DPs will be informed about their losses and entitlements in writing and through personal contact by the PGCB through Resettlement Implementation Officer (RIO) with the help of civil contractor. If satisfied, the DP will claim resettlement payments from the PGCB. If confused, step 2 to be followed.
Step 2 The DP/AP will approach the RIO for clarification. The RIO will clarify any confusion with the DPs, and loss or entitlements as per the revised RP. If resolved, the DP/AP will claim resettlement payments from PGCB. If not resolved, step 3 to be followed.
Step 3 The DPs will approach the GRCs; the RIO will assist the DPs in producing the grievance and will organize a hearing within 15 days from receiving the grievance.
Step 4 GRC sessions will be held with the aggrieved DPs, and minutes recorded and duly circulated. If resolved, the Project Director (PD) of the PGCB will approve the minutes. The approved verdict will be communicated to the aggrieved DP. The DP will then claim resettlement payments from PGCB. If not resolved, step 5 to be followed
Step 5 The case will be referred to the court of law for settlement.
28. A gazette notification on the formation and scope of the GRCs will be required from the
ministry concerned (MOPEMR21). The GRC for each union will comprise of: `
Manager, Power Grid Company Limited-Bangladesh (PGCB) - Convener
Resettlement Implementation Officer (RIO), PGCB – Member Secretary.
Chairman Union Parishad - Member.
Local School Teacher- Member
Representative of DPs including women and members of vulnerable households- Member
29. The functions of the GRC will be to:
21
Ministry of Power Energy and Mineral Resources
13
a. Receive application of APs grievances within one month of the receipt of ID card or
from when APs are informed of their entitlements.
b. Hold open hearings in the office of the Chairperson and resolve the grievance within 15 days of receiving complaints from APs.
c. Inform aggrieved persons about GRC meetings and give them an opportunity to place their grievance before the GRC.
d. Keep meeting minutes and records of grievances. e. Refer the APs’ grievances to the DC or the concerned legal authority, if the
grievance relates to land acquisition or conventional law. f. Make decisions to resolve APs’ grievances following RP policy, if outside
conventional law and the grievance do not lend itself to arbitration. g. Amicably resolve issues quickly without resorting to expensive, time consuming legal
actions.
h. Ensure participation of concerned local people and be an advocate for the interests
of vulnerable APs
VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
30. The RP is based on the national law (Government of Bangladesh), the Electricity Act, 1910, and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). The RP will ensure that all APs – titled and non-titled – will be eligible for appropriate compensation packages under the Project.
VII. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Principles
31. Land requisition and resettlement of the APs, and providing special assistance to vulnerable and indirectly APs in re-establishing their livelihood and income will be conducted in accordance with the negotiated resettlement on willing seller willing buyer method and ADB's Policy on Involuntary Resettlement as well as by following ‘best practice’ followed in Bangladesh, viz: (i) avoiding involuntary resettlement where feasible, (ii) minimizing displacement by considering all alternatives where population displacement is unavoidable, and (iii) ensuring that displaced people receive assistance so that they would be at least as well off as they would have been in the absence of the project. The following are major elements of the policies/practices to be adopted by the Project:
Involuntary resettlement and loss of livelihood will be avoided where feasible;
Where population displacement is unavoidable, it will be minimized by exploring all viable project options;
People unavoidably displaced will be compensated and assisted, so that their economic and social future will be generally as favorable as it would have been without the Project;
Vulnerable APs will be provided with resettlement facilities or support to resettle in proximity to their social groups and good communication network with employment opportunities;
People affected will be informed fully and consulted on resettlement and compensation options;
Gender equity will be maintained in resettlement planning and implementation;
14
Existing social and cultural institutions of resettles and their hosts will be supported and used to the greatest extent possible, and resettles will be integrated economically and socially into host communities;
The absence of a formal title to land by some effected groups will not be a bar for compensation, particular attention should be paid to households headed by women and other vulnerable groups, such as indigenous people and ethnic minorities, elderly and disable persons and appropriate assistance provided to help them improve their status;
As far as possible involuntary resettlement will be conceived and executed as part of the project;
People who will be affected indirectly will be facilitated to regain their livelihood and socio-economic status
Participation of the local community will be ensured through incorporating them in different committees involved in planning throughout the RP implementation process.
32. The full cost of resettlement will be included in the Project costs. The Electricity Act was
enacted in 1910 to amend the laws relating to the supply and use of electrical energy. Under
this Act, any person can get a license to supply energy and to lie down or place electric supply
lines for the conveyance and transmission of energy. The licensee can open and break up the
soil and pavement of any street, railway or tramway and can lay down any line or do other work
near other utility services (like gas, T&T, water, sewer, etc.), provided prior permission is taken
from the respective authority, as stated in Section 12 – 18 of this Act.
a. According to Section 19 (1) of this Act, the licensee shall give full compensation
for any damage, detriment or inconvenience caused by him or by anyone
employed by him.
b. Sub- section (1) of Section 51 of the Electricity Rules, 1937 advise that the
licensee should take precautions in laying down electric supply lines near or
where any metallic substance or line crosses in order to avoid electrocution.
Gaps between laws of Bangladesh and the ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy 33. The Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance (ARIPO), 1982 and
other subsidiary laws in Bangladesh only provides compensation for acquired land, structures
and crops or the properties damaged due to construction of development projects. The
Ordinance provides compensation for acquired properties at market value, for injurious affection
and severance. Furthermore, the Electricity Act of 1910 also provides full compensation for
damaged properties and their restoration. Both the ARIPO and the Electricity Act also stipulate
provisions for grievance redress mechanisms particularly on issues related to acquisition and
compensation.
34. The current compensation and resettlement provisions in the Ordinance are however
inadequate. The statutory compensation prescribed in the Ordinance is based on ‘market value’
and not on ‘replacement cost’. The grievance redress mechanisms are empowered only to
15
address issues related to land acquisition and compensation but not the issues related to
resettlement. No clear provisions are made in the Ordinance for screening the suitability of the
property or exploring alternative properties prior to the publication of the intention of acquisition
under Section 3. However, there are administrative procedures that require the Deputy
Commissioner (DC) to undertake a field inspection visit to the proposed site, to verify its
suitability and get clearance from the District Land Allocation Committee (DLAC) and the
Central Land Allocation Committee (CLAC) before he proceeds with the acquisition process.
35. Legal provisions covering adequate compensation to the displaced persons, particularly
disadvantaged groups such as women and squatters and such other vulnerable groups are not
included in the Ordinance.
36. Furthermore, the legal framework in Bangladesh does not make provisions for the
project executing agencies to address the resettlement issues, such as, (a) exploring alternative
project options that avoid or minimize adverse impacts and risks on people; (c) compensation
for non-titled persons;(c) consulting displaced persons and their host communities on
resettlement issues and options; (d) providing for successful social and economic integration of
the displaced people and their host communities, and (e) full social and economic rehabilitation
of the displaced persons. Table 4 reviews the compliance of the laws and regulations of
Bangladesh with ADB Safeguard Policy of 2009 and recommends action to address the gaps.
37. In the absence of a comprehensive legal framework that meets the safeguard policy
requirements of ADB, the core involuntary resettlement safeguard principles have been
incorporated into the RP. They include (a) provisions for exploring alternative project sites to
minimize adverse impacts on people’s livelihoods; (b) payment of additional compensation to
the DPs by the EAs to bridge the gap between the ‘market value’ determined by the DC and the
‘replacement cost’; (c) consultation and information disclosure to DPs; (d) assistance for
livelihood restoration and improvement; (e) special assistance for vulnerable groups; (f)
assistance for non-titled displaced persons; (g) payment of compensation before displacement
and project implementation; (h) establishing a GRC that is easily accessible and immediately
responsive to the DPs; and (i) monitoring the implementation of the RP.
16
Table 4: A compliance review of the Bangladesh laws and regulations and the involuntary resettlement safeguard principles of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement of
2009
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
01 Avoid IR wherever possible
There is no legislative provision. EA will adopt suitable measures to minimizeIR
02 Minimize IR by exploring project and design alternatives.
There is no legislative provision. EA will adopt suitable measures to explore alternative options
03 Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future IR impacts and risks.
DC receives a proposal from the Requiring Agency justifying the need for land and other property on the basis of field surveys including detailed engineering designs.
DC issues the notice of
acquisition of an identified property for a public purpose. But excludes properties used for religious worship, graveyard and cremation ground [APIRPO22, section 3].
DC acquires property with
approval of the Government or the Divisional Commissioner when such property is needed permanently or temporarily for a public purpose. No such approval is needed in case of emergency [APIRPO section 18. (1)]
The Ordinance does not make provisions for project screening. However, administrative procedures require the DC to undertake a field inspection visit, estimate the number of families, trees and crops to be affected and get clearance from the DLAC and the CLAC before he publishes the acquisition notice. It is also assumed that DC screens the suitability of the property when objections are raised by interested parties after publishing the notice under Section 3. Or else, by the Divisional Commissioner or the Government when DC submits his report of
22
Acquisition and requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance, 1982
17
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
inquiry for lands exceeding 60 bighas. EA will assess resettlement impacts and risks.
04 Carry out meaningful consultations with affected persons, host communities, and concerned nongovernment Organizations.
There is no legislative provision. EA will initiate a consultation process.
05 Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the affected persons’ concerns.
Persons interested can object to the DC on proposed acquisition within 15 days of publishing the notice under section 3 [ARIPO, section 4. (1)]
DC holds an inquiry into the objections raised by the interested parties [ARIPO, section 2]
DC issues a notice
informing the interested parties to submit their claims for compensation after the final decision is made to acquire the land [ARIPO, section 6 (1)]
Any interested person not
satisfied with the compensation awarded by DC within forty-five days from the date of service of notice of the award, can make an application to the Arbitrator for revision of the award [ARIPO, section 8. (1)]
Claimants not satisfied with
the award of the Arbitrator
The ARIPO and Electricity Act provide a number of mechanisms for grievance redress in respect of individual interests in the property and issues related to compensation. But there is no provision to hear several other resettlement related grievances arising from loss of livelihoods, loss of access to public infrastructure, damages to property causing from acquisition and construction related impacts. EA will establish a grievance redress mechanism at local level which is easily accessible and immediately responsive.
18
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
can appeal to the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal whose decision is final [ARIPO, section 34. (1)]
Disputes arising from
compensation for damages causing from laying electricity lines will be determined by arbitration[Electricity Act. 1910, section 10 (2)
06 Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons
There is no legislative provision. EA will implement a livelihood restoration and improvement plan well in advance of displacement and resettlement.
07 Provide cash compensation at replacement value
Compensation is based on considerations of (a) ‘market value’ of the property at the date of the publication of the notice under section 3, [the average value of similar property during 12 months preceding the publication of such notice]; (b) damages to standing crops or trees; (c) severing of property from other property held by persons interested; (d) injurious affection to his other moveable/immoveable property and earnings; (e) compulsion to change his residence or business premises; and (f) diminution of his income from property [ARIPO, section 8 (1)]
In addition, a premium of
The ARIPO provides for compensation which includes compensation at market value, injurious affection and severance. In practice, compensation rates determined by the DC are far below the market rates. The RP to recommend additional compensation to bridge the gap between ‘market value’ and ‘replacement cost’, EA will establish a JVT to prepare an accurate record of all DPs and their losses and a PVAT to establish the replacement cost value.
19
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
15 percent (ARIPO 1982, section 8 (2)] and subsequently amended to 50% (1993) of the ‘market value is added to the compensation in view of the compulsory nature of the acquisition.
In temporary requisition,
compensation includes a) a recurrent payment equal to a monthly rent; b) expenses for vacating the requisitioned property c) cost of re-occupying the property after the release of the requisition; and d) damages caused to property including cost of their restoration [ARIPO, section 5]
Full compensation for any
damage, detriment or inconvenience caused by electricity lines laid by energy suppliers (licensee) or their duly authorized operators [Electricity Act, 1910, section 19(1)]
The Electricity Act (1910) places its emphasis on compensation for damages caused to public property such as streets, railways, tramways, pipe wires, sewers and telegraph lines and not much on the private properties. Also, the Electricity Rules prevent payment of compensation for land used for erecting transmission line towers and land under Right of Way. However, compensation will be paid only for the loss of or damages to crops.
08 Provide additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes
There is no legal provision. EA will ensure additional support for affected persons
09 Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed assistance
There is no legal provision. EA will ensure needed assistance for affected persons
10 Improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable
There is no legal provision. EA will ensure improvement of living standards of the
20
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards
displaced poor and vulnerable groups and the implementation of a GAP.
11 Ensure that displaced persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.
DC pays a portion of compensation in cash to persons who cultivate the land of another person on condition of delivering a share of produce from that land to that person (bargadar) for the value of standing crops on that land (ARIPO, section 10A.]
No
12 Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement
DC pays compensation to persons entitled within 60 days of depositing the required funds by the ‘requiring person/agency’. [ARIPO, section 10. (1)]
The Act stipulates a reasonable timeframe for payment of compensation. However, delays are reported in practice. EA will ensure payment of compensation before displacement.
13 Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an accessible place and a formal language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders.
There is no legal provision. EA will take necessary action for public disclosure of the RP.
14 Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of
There is no legal provision. EA will include full resettlement cost in the project’s costs.
21
Sl. No.
ADB Safeguard Policy Principles (2009)
Relevant Policies, Laws and Regulations in Bangladesh
Degree of compliance or gaps and proposed action to address gaps
resettlement in the presentation of project’s costs and benefits.
15 Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, the IR impacts on the standards of living of displaced persons
There is no legal provision. EA will implement a monitoring and reporting system to assess resettlement outcomes and impacts.
VIII. Compensation Framework
38. An entitlement matrix has been prepared on the basis of currently known impacts. It
identifies the categories of impact based on surveys carried out in the subproject area and
shows the entitlements for each type of loss. The entitlement matrix also incorporates potential
impacts as confirmed by the DMS (census and SES) after finalization and approval of the DD. If
l alignment changes during preparation of final RP, based on the DMS, then such losses will be
included in the entitlement matrix and the final RP will be revised accordingly. The date of the
census along the new alignment will be the cut-off date for resettlement benefits; and any
encroachers/informal settlers after that date will not be entitled to resettlement benefits. For land
title-holders, notification under section 3 by the DC under the LAA will constitute the cut-off date.
However, since this project does not have any land acquisition, this item has not been included
in the entitlement matrix. The compensation will be calculated based on prevailing market rate
and will be paid in Taka. If the time gap between the property valuation and payment of
compensation is more a 1 year, the Property Assessment and Valuation Team (PAVT) will
reassess the value as per the recent market rates.
Table 5: Entitlement Matrix
Item No.
Type of loss
Entitled Persons
(Beneficiaries)
Entitlement (Compensation
Package)
Implementing Agencies / Remarks
1. Loss of Structure
Legal owner(s) of structures, or Non-titled DPs occupying land of the Government (Khas Land)
i. Replacement value of structure determined by Property Assessment and Valuation Team (PAVT)
ii. Site Improvement Grant for Relocation of Structure @ 10% of the replacement value of
i.PAVT ii.PGCB/Contractor iii.PGCB/Contractor iv.PGCB/Contractor v. APs
22
Item No.
Type of loss
Entitled Persons
(Beneficiaries)
Entitlement (Compensation
Package)
Implementing Agencies / Remarks
structure iii. Transfer grant (TG) @
12.50 % of the replacement value of structure assessed by PVAT
iv. Reconstruction grant23 (RG) @ 12.50% of the replacement value of structure assessed by PVAT subject to minimum of Tk2,000.
v. Owners to take away all salvage materials free of cost.
i.
3. Loss of timber and fruit bearing trees
Legal owner and non-titled user of land as determined by DC
i. Cash compensation according to market value based on productivity and age of trees and value fruit bearing trees assessed by PAVT.
ii. Additional 30 % of assessed value of compensation for fruit bearing trees with timber for fruit bearing trees (without timber): if the tree is at or near fruit bearing stage estimated current market value of the fruits as determined by PVAT.
iii. For fruit bearing trees
(with timber): if the tree is at or near fruit bearing stage estimated current market value of
This item is included in the Environment Management Plan. To avoid double counting, this item will not be paid through RP, and hence not covered in the resettlement budget. However, to ensure the right entitlement, compensation package is described here. The item will also be included in the social monitoring report, referring the EMP provision
23
Reconstruction grant includes transport cost and some labor cost which is not included in replacement cost.
23
Item No.
Type of loss
Entitled Persons
(Beneficiaries)
Entitlement (Compensation
Package)
Implementing Agencies / Remarks
the timber and fruits as determined by PAVT.
iv. Owners will be allowed to fell and take away their trees, perennial crops free of cost without delaying the project works.
v. Tree loser will be encouraged to plant more trees by providing 10 sample costs 1000 for each sampling free of cost to each affected house.
i.
5. Loss of standing crops
Cultivator (person who planted the crops) whether title holder of the land/non- title holder of the land/sharecropper/ lessee/ unauthorized occupant of the land etc.
i. Cash grant for loss of crop and transition allowance equivalent to one (01) year income from the land for non-titled leaseholders or users as determined by PVAT.
ii. Crop loser will be allowed to harvest and take away their crops and residuals without delaying the project work.
i.PAVT, PGCB/Contractor ii. APs
6. Loss of standing crops in case of title-holders to the land to be used for construction of tower
Land owner i. Cash grant for loss of crop and transition allowance equivalent to 5 times of land used in different seasons for different purpose for construction of tower. The money for crop compensation is to be calculated based on equivalent to crop loss for each season by time of intervention which
i.PAVT, PGCB/Contractor ii. APs
24
Item No.
Type of loss
Entitled Persons
(Beneficiaries)
Entitlement (Compensation
Package)
Implementing Agencies / Remarks
will range from one to ten seasons (04 to 40months) for titled leaseholders or users as determined by PAVT.
ii. Crop loser will be allowed to harvest and take away their crops and residuals without delaying the project work.
7. Loss of Hand Tube Well(HTW)/ Shallow Tube Well (STW) and/or Toilets
Legal owner/Socially recognized owners as identified during census or joint verification
i. One time cash grant of Tk 10,000 for each HTW/STW
ii. One time cash grant of Tk 8,000 for each Toilet (slab latrine).
iii. The displaced person is
supposed to shift, carry and re-install the Tube-well/ structure on his/her own by using this compensation money
i.PGCB/Contractor ii.PGCB/Contractor iii.APs
2.
8 Impacts on vulnerable DPs
Vulnerable DPs, land less, female headed households24
i. APs who lose their livelihoods will be offered places on employee training program(s) and offered employment after successful completion;
ii. Vulnerable DPswill be prioritized in any employment required for the project.
i.PGCB/Contractor ii.PGCB/Contractor
9. Temporary/ unforeseen impact during
Community/ Individual
i. The contractor shall bear the cost of any impact on structure or land due to movement
i. Contractor ii.PGCB
24
Widow, female headed households, landless farmers who lives only on agriculture from the project affected land, and physically challenged people are classified as vulnerable
25
Item No.
Type of loss
Entitled Persons
(Beneficiaries)
Entitlement (Compensation
Package)
Implementing Agencies / Remarks
construction of machinery and in connection with transportation of construction materials.
ii. All temporary use of lands outside proposed ROW to be arranged through written approval of the landowners and contractor.
iii. Temporary
requisitioned land will be returned to owner rehabilitated to original or preferably better condition.
IX. Relocation of Housing and Settlements
39. Considering the scarcity of land and growing population, income restoration for land-
based families is a growing challenge in Bangladesh. Realizing this challenge income
restoration activities have been planned accordingly. PGCB in collaboration with local
administration will try to identifying government land (cultivable) to sublease it to the displaced
households as an income restoration measure.
40. GOB has launched a national level livelihood program. PGCB will proactively work
towards linking the affected HHs with this national scheme so as to ensure that the affected
HHs benefit from the same. Additional specific measures have also been planned and included
in the entitlement matrix for rebuilding the houses in new location.
41. The socio-economic survey initially identified 24 structures to be displaced from the
ROW. Later PGCB confirmed that structures below 3 meter height would not be displaced as
per the cable pulling design principle. However, if any HH is identified with structures above 3
meter along the ROW during the 100% census, those households shall be compensated with
replacement cost for only their affected structures and trees.
X Income Livelihood Restoration and Rehabilitation
42. The RP includes the following categories of affected households for income livelihood
restoration program (ILRP):
Vulnerable households to be relocated from the project’s right of way. Eligible
members of such families will be identified while planning the ILRP.
Vulnerable households having no adult male members to shoulder household
responsibilities (women headed households).
Vulnerable households completely losing access to agricultural land including
26
sharecroppers, and landowner/ leaseholders as well as those who would be
severely affected by the construction of towers on their land (losing more than
10% of their land asset or other sources of income).
43. For additional support to usual income restoration assistance as mentioned above, the
Resettlement Implementation Officer (RIO) of PGCB will undertake assessment of needs and
skill base of vulnerable DPs of the ages between 15 to 45 years. PGCB will recommend eligible
members of affected vulnerable households along with their relevant profile to the
ILRPimplementing organization, for fare judgment to the vulnerable.
XI. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan
44. The costs for resettlement activities, relocation and special assistance will be consistent with the resettlement policy. Other costs involving information disclosure, public consultations and focus group discussions, surveys, training, monitoring and evaluation, and ILRP has been included in the RP budget. Since the project does not have any scope to purchase land for the tower foundations, crop compensation with enhanced rate has been calculated for the land owners, whose land will be used for tower construction.A lump sum amount of contingency has also been kept to meet unforeseen items. The methodology for assessing unit compensation values of different items is as follows:
Table6: Indicative Budget for compensation`
Description Unit Quantity Rate (Tk)
Amount (Tk)
Compensation for crops for 40 acres of cultivable land 2 to 3 times as needed during stringing of cables
Acres 40.00 acres
Tk1,500 per decimal
6,000,000.00
Crop compensation for economic displacement due to construction of foundation at tower legs plus special assistance
Number
160 legs Tk6,250 per leg
1,000,000.00
Crop compensation at the base of the tower (20mx20m=400 Sqm)x 40, for one year
Acres 3.95 acres
Tk 1,500 per decimal
592,000.00
Subtotal 1 i. ii. iii. 7,592,000.00
Provision for Special Assistance to Vulnerable in the project area
iv. v. vi. 100,000.00
Administrative /Implementing Agency Operation Cost(costs involving information disclosure, public consultations and focus group discussions, surveys, training, monitoring)
vii. viii. mpsum
ix. 1,000,000.00
Provision for Social Development activities
3. 100,000.00
27
Description Unit Quantity Rate (Tk)
Amount (Tk)
Contingency x. xi. xii. 200,000.00
Subtotal 2 xiii. xiv. xv. 1,400,000.00
Total Cost (Taka) xvi. xvii. xviii. 8,992,000.00
28
XII. Institutional Arrangements
45. Power Grid Company Bangladesh Limited (PGCB) will establish, for the Project, a
Project Implementation Unit (PIU) headed by a Project Director, at the headquarters that will be
responsible for the overall execution of the Project. The PGCB will implement the RP through
setting a Resettlement Unit (RU) headed by Deputy Manager (Resettlement Implementation
Officer, RIO) within the PIU. The RIO, under the overall responsibility of the Project Director, will
undertake day-to-day activities. The PGCB official at the rank of Manager will play the role of
convener of Property Assessment & Valuation Team (PAVT) and convener of GRC.
46. The RU will coordinate land acquisition, manage resettlement and rehabilitation of the
DPs, disburse resettlement grants, and ensure DPs’ access to the development programs
adequately. The RU will carry out the following specific tasks relating to RP implementation:
Liaison with district administration to support land acquisition (if required) and RP
implementation activities;
Discharge overall responsibility of planning, management, monitoring and
implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation program;
Ensure availability of budget for all activities;
Synchronize resettlement activity and handover land with construction schedule;
Develop RP implementation tools and form necessary committees.
Monitor the effectiveness of entitlement packages
47. The RIO will supervise the works undertaken by his/her team in the field offices, carry
out information campaign and involve affected persons including women in the implementation
process from the very beginning. The team will collect, collate, computerize and process data
for identification of eligible persons correctly for resettlement benefits and assess their
entitlements as per RP policy. However, the RU will ensurethe payments after necessary
scrutiny. The RIO (at RU), in charge of the land acquisition and resettlement management, will
report to the Project Director. He/she will work in close coordination with the respective field-
based offices on the day-to-day activities of the resettlement implementation.
48. The RIO through the field offices will execute and monitor the progress of the RP
implementation work. He/she will ensure coordination between the relevant departments,
Implementing Agency, the GRC, PAVT and the project DPs. Apart from the GRC, Property
Assessment and Valuation Team (PAVT) will be formed by the Ministry of Power, Energy and
Mineral Resources (MOPEMR) for assessment of loss valuation of affected property and
resolution of disputes. The composition and formation of committees and mechanisms for
quantification and valuation of properties and grievance redress will be constituted through
government gazette. People's participation will be ensured through recruiting their
representatives in these committees.
49. The MOPEMR will form PAVT for the project through a gazette notification for the
project. The PAVT will conduct a survey for determining compensation for the affected crops in
tower and transmission lines. Taking into account of the usage of land for the project
29
components, the PAVT will assess the loss and compensation in each of the time of occupying
the land by the project. The PAVT will consult prices of the crops of District/Upazila Agriculture
Extension office and Marketing office. The Implementing agency will process the entitlements of
the project-affected persons using the PAVT. The PAVT will be comprised as:
a. Manager, PGCB - Convener
b. Resettlement Implementation officer, PGCB – Member
c. Representative of concerned Local Government - Member
d. Upazila Agriculture officer - Member
e. Assistant Engineer LGED - Member
50. The Implementing agency will process the entitlements of the project-affected persons
using the PAVT. Based on the assessment of the PAVT, the RIO will instruct the contractor to
make payment as per agreement. The payment to be made through cheque in presence of RIO
and local government representative of the locality. Proper accounts to be recorded and
maintain and kept for audit. Compensation amounting less than Tk. 2,000 can be given on cash
following the above procedure.
XIII. Implementation Schedule
51. The said compensation mechanism should be implemented within five months before
the construction work starts. A typical semi-detailed sequence of activities to be pursued during
five months for the implementation of the compensation plan is given in table7.
Table 7: RP Implementation Schedule
Activities
2015 2016
May June July August Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
Request for Formation of Committees
xix. xx. xxi. xxii. xxiii. xxiv. xxv. xxvi.
Formation of PAVT/GRC xxvii. xxviii. xxix. xxx. xxxi. xxxii. xxxiii. xxxiv.
Draft Detailed Design (DD) completed
xxxv. xxxvi. xxxvii. xxxviii. xxxix. xl. xli. xlii.
PMO Consulting APs/Beneficiaries on DD
xliii. xliv. xlv. xlvi. xlvii. xlviii. xlix. l.
Finalizing DD li. lii. liii. liv. lv. lvi. lvii. lviii.
DMS/ Census/SES done by Resettlement Consultant/ PMO
lix. lx. lxi. lxii. lxiii. lxiv. lxv. lxvi.
Census/SES (DMS) Analysis by Resettlement Expert
lxvii. lxviii. lxix. lxx. lxxi. lxxii. lxxiii. lxxiv.
Video Filming of Right of the way
lxxv. lxxvi. lxxvii. lxxviii. lxxix. lxxx. lxxxi. lxxxii.
30
Overlay DD &Mauja Maps
lxxxiii. lxxxiv. lxxxv. lxxxvi. lxxxvii. lxxxviii. lxxxix. xc.
Hiring Contractor xci. xcii. xciii. xciv. xcv. xcvi. xcvii. xcviii.
RU reviews/Certifies Census/SES/Video
xcix. c. ci. cii. ciii. civ. cv. cvi.
Revision of RP based on DMS by Resettlement Expert
cvii. cviii. cix. cx. cxi. cxii. cxiii. cxiv.
ADB Clearance of Revised RP
cxv. cxvi. cxvii. cxviii. cxix. cxx. cxxi. cxxii.
Disclosure of Revised RP with APs/Beneficiaries
cxxiii. cxxiv. cxxv. cxxvi. cxxvii. cxxviii. cxxix. cxxx. cxxxi.
Consultation and GRM (Continuous)
cxxxii. cxxxiii. cxxxiv. cxxxv. cxxxvi. cxxxvii. cxxxviii. cxxxix. cxl. cxli.
Start payment of compensation to EPs by PMU/ RU
cxlii. cxliii. cxliv. cxlv. cxlvi. cxlvii. cxlviii. cxlix. cl.
Construction (18 months) 2016/17
cli. clii. cliii. cliv. clv. clvi. clvii. clviii. clix.
XIV. Monitoring and Reporting
52. PGCB as the EA will establish a monitoring system internally for collection, analysis,
reporting and use of information about the progress of resettlement based on the RP. The EA
will gather information on RP implementation covering relevant activities as per schedule. The
internal monitoring reports on RP implementation will be included in the quarterly Project
Progress Report (QPR). Quarterly reports of RP implementation will be prepared by the RIO
submitted to the director, PGCB. Besides, a semi-annual report stipulating all efforts and
outcomes will be sought by the ADB from the PGCB. The report of RU will contain: (i)
accomplishment to-date, (ii) objectives attained and not attained during the period, (iii)
challenges encountered, and (iv)targets for the next quarter. PGCB will collate the information of
QPR and submit semi-annual Social Monitoring Report (SMR) to ADB on January and July of
each year, until the completion of RP implementation. The basic indicators to be assessed in
the SMR are appended as Annex 2.
53. Compliance monitoring of RP implementation will cover (i) project compensation and
entitlement policies, (ii) adequacy of organizational mechanism for implementing the RP, (iii)
restoration of DPs’ incomes, (iv)settling complaints and grievances, and (v) provisions for
adequate budgetary support by the PGCB for implementing the RP. The EMA will assess if the
DPs: (a) have been paid proper compensation and resettlement grants before their
displacement; (b) have reestablished their structures; (c) have re-established their businesses;
and (d) were extended assistance to restore their incomes from pre-project levels. It will also
appraise the accounting documents used in recording the payments of compensation to DPs by
the EA.
31
32
Annex 1 Deed of land transfer from Bangladesh Railway to PGCB
33
34
35
Annex 2
Socio-economic profile of the project affected people
The socio-economic survey (SES) has been carried out in April 2015 to facilitate in preparing
the RP and baseline information have been collected from the affected households (32 HH)
through a structured questionnaire in the project area for construction of the Transmission line.
Property valuation survey has also been conducted to determine replacement value of the
properties at the time of preparation of the resettlement budget. The survey also covered
existing site of the back to back HVDC station. In addition to that all the private land loser,
structure losers, loss of trees and displaced persons on the ROW of the transmission line have
also been covered by the survey
Table-3: Affected Population by Sex and by Village
Sl. No
Name of Village
Sex-wise Population Number of Households Male % Female % Total %
1. Charmirkamari 4 2.48 6 3.30 10 11.7 3
2. Baraichara 5 3.10 4 2.20 9 10.53 4
3. Chreasta 1 0.62 - 4. 1 1.17 1
4. Bagail 8 4.96 6 3.30 14 16.38 3
5. 5 No Sagata 9 5.58 11 6.05 20 23.40 5
6. Chargolapnagar 35 21.70 28 15.40 63 73.71 16
Total
62 19.84 55 17.80 117 37.44 32
Survey result shows that there are 32 affected households in the project area consisting 117 members. This includes 62 males and 55 females. Out of 32 HHs, maximum16 will be affected in the village Char Gopalnagor and Minimum1 in Chreasta. The sex ratio of male and female of this affected area 53 % males and 47% female. The average family size is 3.66 members per HH which is below than the national average.
Table-4: Number of Affected Households and Location of Land (Dec) by Villages**
Sl. No
Name of Village Union
Affected Households
Percentage
Area of Affected Land (Dec)
Average per Household
1. Charmirkamari Chalimpur 3 9.375 35 11.66
2. Baraichara ,, 4 12.5 55 18.33
3. Chreasta pourasova 1 3.12 10 3.33
4. Bagail Pakshi 3 9.375 26 8.66
5. 5 No Sagata ,, 5 15.625 46 15.33
6. Chargolapnagar ,, 16 50 128 42.66
Total 06 03 32 100 300 100
36
Table 5 shows the land ownership pattern of the households. 32 households have 300 Decimal of own land. But their main source of income is business, service and other activities. They are not dependent on agricultural activities. Table-5: Households Land Holding
Sl. No
Name of Village
land less 0to 49 Decimal
Marginal 50to 149 Decimal
Small 150 to 249 Decimal
Medium 250 to 749
Big 750 above
Total
1. Charmirkamari
2 1 - - 3
2. Baraichara 2 1 1 - - 4
3. Chreasta 1 - - - - 1
4. Bagail 1 2 - - - 3
5. 5 No Sagata 5 - - - - 5
6. Chargolapnagar 13 2 1 - - 16
Total
06 22 7 3
32
To know the land holding size, the households are classified into five groups such as, (i) functionally landless (those who possess up to 49 decimal of land), (ii) marginal (50 to 149), (iii) small (150 to 249 decimal), (IV) medium (250 to 749 decimal), and (v) Large (750decimal and above). It is understood from the table that most of the households are functionally landless and 31.25% are marginal and small farm holders. There is no household in the area with a large land holding group. Table-6: Distribution of 32 Affected Households in Relation to Area of Khas Land to be lost by them
Sl. No Name of Village
Number of Affected Households in Relation to Area of Land to be Lost
Up to 10 Dec
Above 10 Dec Total
1. Charmirkamari 2 1 3
2. Baraichara 1 3 4
3. Chreasta 1 - 1
4. Bagail 3 - 3
5. 5 No Sagata 4 1 5
6. Chargolapnagar 13 3 16
Total 6 24 8 32
Percentage 75 25 100
It is seen that most of the landless and marginal farmers or farm holders and heads of HH are livingon and having livelihood from khas land. It is observed that the size of the operated land whetherkhas or leased land under cultivation, in some cases, is bigger than what they own. Table-7: Number of Affected Households in Relation to the Amount of Money to be Lost Due to Losing Access to Khas Land
37
Sl. No Name of Villages
Number of Households in Relation to Amount of Loss
Up to-2000
2001-3000
3001-4000
4001-5000
Above 5000
Total
1. Charmirkamari - - - - 3 3
2. Baraichara - - - 1 3 4
3. Chreasta - - - 1 - 1
4. Bagail - - 1 2 - 3
5. 5 No Sagata 1 1 1 2 - 5
6. Chargolapnagar 4 3 2 7 - 16
Total 6 5 4 4 13 6 32
Percentage 16 12.8 12.8 41.6 19.2 100
Table-8: Occupations of the Affected Household Heads by Village
Sl. No Name of Village
Number of Households by Occupations
Agriculture
Business
Service
Housewife Others Total
1. Charmirkamari - 2 1 - - 3
2. Baraichara - 1 2 - 1 4
3. Chreasta - 1
-
1
4. Bagail - 1 1 - 1 3
5. 5 No Sagata - 1 1 2 1 5
6. Chargolapnagar
- 1 7 - 8 16
Total 6 - 7 12 2 11 32
Percentage
21.9 37.5 6.3 34.4 100
It is found in the Table 8 about 21.875% of total population is in Business, where 37.5% are in service, 6% engaged in household work and about 34.375% of total affected population is working in other sector. There is no idle work force in the locality Table-9: Distribution of the Affected Households in Relation to Annual Income (Tk)
Sl. No
Name of Villages
Number of Households in Relation to Annual Income
Up to 60,000 (Very Poor)
60,001-72,000 (Poor)
Above 72,000 (Crossed Poor Level)
Total
1. Charmirkamari - 2 1 3
2. Baraichara - 3 1 4
38
3. Chreasta - 1 - 1
4. Bagail 1 2 - 3
5. 5 No Sagata 1 4 - 5
6. Chargolapnagar 1 14 1 16
Total 6 3 26 3 32
Percentage 9.6 81.3 9.8 100
Household income and expenditure is important indicator to measure the socio-economic condition of people. In the project area, it is found that most of the income and expenditure varies from Tk60,000 to Tk720,000 per year. The income and expenditure of the people in the range of over Tk2,000 per day was not found. There is land less, and marginal farmers but there are no women-headed household in the project area which can be termed as vulnerable affected people. Poverty is measured through self-assessment in the study area. This measurement is mainly based on monetary value. In this process the respondents were asked to assess the overall condition of people living in the study area. Their responses are assembled into three categories such as deficit, breakeven and surplus. According to respondents most of the people are in breakeven categories whereas only 10% households include in surplus categories. But rest of them (10%) households is in Deficit categories.
Table-10: Household in respect of education of the affected people
Sl. No Name of Village
Number of Households by Education
No literacy
1to 10 SSC HSC BA and
Above total
1. Charmirkamari -
2 1 3
2. Baraichara -
1 3 - 4
3. Chreasta 1
-
1
4. Bagail - 2
1-
3
5. 5 No Sagata 2 3
5
6. Chargolapnagar 7 7 1 - 1 16
Total 6 10 12 2 6 2 32
Percentage 31.3 37.5 6.3 18.9 6.3
100
It is seen that 32 households earningfrom the khas land will be affecteddue to intervention of the project. Table-11: Number of Affected Households in Relation to Latrine in Home
Sl. No Name of Villages
Number of Households in Relation to Latrine
39
Pucca Semi Pucca No Latrine Total
1. Charmirkamari 3 - - 3
2. Baraichara 2 2 - 4
3. Chreasta 1 - - 1
4. Bagail 2 1 - 3
5. 5 No Sagata 1 4 - 5
6. Chargolapnagar 4 8 4 16
Total 6 13 15 4 32
Percentage 4.16 4.8 1.28 100
In the project area, there are 32 affected HHs have sanitary toilet facilities, 40.62% with water-sealedand 46.88% with non-water-sealed sanitation system. 12.5% household has non-sanitary toilet facility.
.
Table-12: Membership of the Affected Households’ Family Members in NGOs
Sl. No Name of Villages
ASA BRAC GB Other NGOs
Non Member
Total
1. Charmirkamari - - 1 - 2 3
2. Baraichara - 1 - 1 2 4
3. Chreasta - - - 1 - 1
4. Bagail - 1 1 1 - 3
5. 5 no Sagata 1 1 2 1 - 5
6. Chargolapnagar 5 3 4 2 2 16
Total 6 6 6 8 6 6 32
Percentage 1.92 1.92 2.56 1.92 1.92 100
In the project area there are 32 affected house hold. Most of the affected people are member of NGO and some of them are members of more than one NGO. Maximum affected used to have the benefit either from Government or from NGO.
40
Annex 3 List of Stakeholders at Focus Group Discussions at Iswardee and Bheramara
SL No.
Name of HH Head
Father/ Husband's
Name Village Union Upazilla Zilla
1 MD SAMSUL
ALAM L/ABDUR RAHIM CHARMIKATARI CHALIMPUR ISWARDI PABNA
2 MD AKTER HOSSAIN
L/ABDUR RASHID MIAH
CHARMIKATARI CHALIMPUR ISWARDI PABNA
3
ABDUL HALIM BISSAH
AGAHAR LI CHARMIKATARI CHALIMPUR ISWARDI PABNA
4 MD ATIAR BISSAS AGAHAR BISSAS BARAITOLA CHALIMPUR ISWARDI PABNA
5 ABDUR RAHAMAN ALLEK PROBIN BARAITOLA POUROSABA ISWARDI PABNA
6 MD TURAF SARDAR
RAJB ALI SARDAR BARAI TOLA JOYNAGAR ISWARDI PABNA
7 MD TURAF SARDAR
,, ,, ,, ,, ,,
8 CHABIR L/DABIR UDDIN CHAR EASTA CHALIMPUR ISWARDI PABNA
9 MD ALIULLA ABUL HOSSAIN BAGAIL PAKSHI ISWARDI PABNA
10 MD RABIUL ALAM L/RUTTAM ALI UTTAR BAGAIL PAKSHI ISWARDI PABNA
11 MD JINNA L/RAHAMAN CIVIL HAT PAKSHI ISWARDI PABNA
12 MD RAJJAK MD KHABIR 5 NO SARAGHAT PAKSHI ISWARDI PABNA
41
SL No.
Name of HH Head
Father/ Husband's
Name Village Union Upazilla Zilla
MONDAL MONDAL
13 GIOUS CHOBED 5NO SARAGHAT PAKSHI ISWARDI PABNA
14 RAJJAK MUNSHI JABED 5NO SARAGHAT MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
15 REJON
CHOUDURY AHMED 5NO SARAGHAT MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
16 MD MASUD MARUF ALI CHARGOLAFNAGAR MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
17 MD NIJAM MULLA BISHA MULLA CHAR
GULAPNAGAR MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
18 MD TUFAJJAL MD TAUB ALI CHAR
GULAPNAGAR MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
19 EDRIS MULLA HOSSAIN MATABBR ,, ,, ,, KUSTIA
20 MD SIDDIK HOSSAINMATABBAR CHAR
GULAPNAGAR MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
21 MD MUJAN L/SUKUR CHAR
GULAPNAGAR MUKARAMPUR VHERAMARA KUSTIA
22 MOHSHIN REJA STTAR PRODAN ,, ,, ,, KUSTIA
23 MUSARAF MD SATTAR
PRODAN ,, ,, ,, KUSTIA
24
MD.SAFIKUR RAHMAN
AHAD ALI ,, ,, ,, ,,
42
SL No.
Name of HH Head
Father/ Husband's
Name Village Union Upazilla Zilla
25 RASUL BEPARI AMER ALI BEPARI
CHAR GULAPNAGAR
MUKARAMPUR
VHERAMARA
KUSTIA
43
Annex 4 Guideline on internal Monitoring The EA usually has full responsibility for internal monitoring. Monitoring takes place against the activities, entitlements, time frame and budget set out in the RP. The internal monitoring is often based upon a card system kept in the monitoring office recording the entitlements due to and received by each affected household. The card system can be manual or computerized. Some countries provide each entitled household or person with a resettlement card recording their entitlements due and received for their own records. The record system is supplemented by periodic survey designed to measure change against the baseline established during the initial census and survey work. The periodic survey focuses upon the receipt of entitlements by people affected and on the benefits indicators. The EA of the RP will develop a method for the monitoring work, including periodic surveys and achievement of progress against activities and entitlements that comprise the Plan. The method will specify the survey plan, sampling framework, frequency, resources, and responsibilities. Monitoring will normally continue throughout the life of the project, even after the period of intensive resettlement activity. Bank policy specifies that complete recovery from resettlement can be protracted and may require monitoring well after resettlement activities are completed, sometimes after project facilities are commissioned and Bank financing is complete. Monitoring indicators will be selected to address the specific contents of the activities and entitlements matrix. Sample monitoring indicators, from which specific indicators can be developed and refined according to the circumstances, are set out below.
Potential Monitoring Indicators
Type of Monitoring Basis for Indicators
Budget and Time Frame
· Have all land acquisition and resettlement staff been appointed and mobilized for the field and office work on schedule?
· Have capacity building and training activities been completed on schedule? · Are resettlement implementation activities being achieved against agreed
implementation plan? · Are funds for resettlement being allocated to resettlement agencies on time?
· Have resettlement offices received the scheduled funds? · Have funds been disbursed according to RP? · Has the social preparation phase taken place as scheduled? · Has all land been acquired and occupied in time for project implementation?
Delivery of AP Entitlements
· Have all APs received entitlements according to numbers and categories of loss set out in the entitlement matrix?
· Have APs received payments on time? · Have APs losing from temporary land borrow been compensated? · Have all APs received the agreed transport costs, relocation costs, income
substitution support and any resettlement allowances, according to schedule? · Have all replacement land plots or contracts been provided? Was the land
developed as specified? Are measures in train to provide land tittles to APs? · How many APs households have received land titles? · How many APs have received housing as per relocation options in the RP? · Does house quality meet the standards agreed? · Have relocation sites been selected and developed as per agreed standards? · Are the APs occupying the new houses? · Are assistance measures being implemented as planned for host communities? · Is restoration proceeding for social infrastructure and services?
44
· Are APs able to access schools, health services, cultural sites and activities? · Are income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in
the income restoration plan, for example utilizing replacement land, commencement of production, numbers of APs trained and provided with jobs, micro-credit disbursed, number of income generating activities assisted?
· Have affected businesses received entitlements including transfer and payments for net losses resulting from lost business and stoppage of production?
Consultation, Grievance and Special Issues
· Have consultations taken place as scheduled including meetings, groups, community activities? Have resettlement leaflets been prepared and distributed?
· How many APs know their entitlements? How many know if they have been received?
· Have any APs used the grievance redress procedures?What were the outcomes? Have conflicts been resolved?
· Was the social preparation phase implemented? · Were special measures for indigenous peoples implemented?
Benefit Monitoring · What changes have occurred in patterns of occupation, production and resource use compared to the pre-project situation?
· What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns compared to pre-project situation? What have been the changes in cost of living compared to pre-project situation? Have APs incomes kept pace with these changes?
· What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards?
· What changes have occurred for vulnerable groups?